Develop Bugs

[Q] What ROM is closest to stock (but with 4.0.3)?

Hi,
I want 4.0.3 but I don't want all the stuff chefs are adding. Unless that stuff is not noticeable at all. Basically I'm looking for battery improvement for my stock ROM.
What ROM is closest to stock ROM? Visually and functionally.
Thanks!!!

compile 4.0.3 from AOSP yourself and don't add anything.

zerozoneice said:
compile 4.0.3 from AOSP yourself and don't add anything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Compile" sounds very developerish and scary

bullka said:
"Compile" sounds very developerish and scary
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no pleasure without pain
official stock right now is 4.0.2, everything else related to 4.0.3 are AOSP based, meaning either take what's out there or compile own ROM.
simple

I will be making a GSM "stock" 4.0.3 build soon for somebody. You are welcome to it once I get it done.

Learn how to build, you'll love your phone more.

Best kernel to use with JB?

I'm running Jelly Bean on my Verizon GN with the kernel that came with it. Is there a better one I should be using?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

I was using Fanco 216 For a while and it ran great I just flashed trinity Alpha 28 and i have heard good things about it, try one of those

Stock? Havn't found a kernel yet which doesn't lag for me atleast =] i dont mean extreme lag just little stutters that i didn't noticed when using stock

I've been happy with the GlaDos 2.0RC on JB so far..

I'm happy with the stock one for now.

trinity kernel, the way google wanted jellybean to be ran. here, experimental tab http://www.derkernel.com/jbtuna.php#

Franco 216 is easily the best

Stock. Had issues with franco.

Loki047 said:
Stock. Had issues with franco.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where can I get the stock version. I'm running the sprint version are you jelling rc1
sent from my SAMSUNG GALAXY NEXUS with ANDROID 4.1 JELLY BEAN

Stock. I tried some and they were horrible. Franko was always nice but on jb it made it ten times slower, i have never ever experienced so much lag before. Stock is fast, does not lag, gets nice battery consumption so why would you even consider tinkering around.

Stock. its the smoothest for me so far

Can anybody give Me a link for the stock kernel thanks in advance
sent from my SAMSUNG GALAXY NEXUS with ANDROID 4.1 JELLY BEAN

Just like any 'what kernel should I use with _____' thread, answers will never be objective and will be based on individual results which will not necessarily be reproducible on every handset. There are already multiple threads asking what the best kernel is for 4.1.
Also:
1. Android 4.1 Jelly Bean has not been released. A developer preview does not count.
2. Android 4.1 Jelly Bean sources have not been released

edgargurrola01 said:
Can anybody give Me a link for the stock kernel thanks in advance
sent from my SAMSUNG GALAXY NEXUS with ANDROID 4.1 JELLY BEAN
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw a link to the stock kernel in this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1738018. It should work with any galaxy nexus variant, but as always, flash at your own risk and nandroid first.

JaiaV said:
Just like any 'what kernel should I use with _____' thread, answers will never be objective and will be based on individual results which will not necessarily be reproducible on every handset. There are already multiple threads asking what the best kernel is for 4.1.
Also:
1. Android 4.1 Jelly Bean has not been released. A developer preview does not count.
2. Android 4.1 Jelly Bean sources have not been released
3. Android 4.1 Jelly Bean kernel sources have not been released. Kernel mods are done on decompiled software which is never as reliable as modifying source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
think you're wrong on 3. google did release source for 4.1 kernel

ceejay83 said:
think you're wrong on 3. google did release source for 4.1 kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Edit: correct. 4.1 kernel source was released. I missed it.

been running Lean kernel, and its my first "non-stock" kernel since flashing jellybean last week. gotta say I love it so far. great battery life, and just as smooth as stock as far as my use goes. I got 4 1/2 hrs of screen on time tody with it. on WiFi all day, but still happy
dschoenike

molesarecoming said:
Stock. I tried some and they were horrible. Franko was always nice but on jb it made it ten times slower, i have never ever experienced so much lag before. Stock is fast, does not lag, gets nice battery consumption so why would you even consider tinkering around.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My feelings exactly... I have always been a Franko kernel user previously, but I found his JB kernel to be very choppy. I then went and reflashed the ROM(didn't know where to get the actual stock kernel from) so I could go back to the stock kernel and I am happy again! lol
But it really is a personal choice which depends a lot on what you individually want to do with your phone.

JaiaV said:
Just like any 'what kernel should I use with _____' thread, answers will never be objective and will be based on individual results which will not necessarily be reproducible on every handset. There are already multiple threads asking what the best kernel is for 4.1.
Also:
1. Android 4.1 Jelly Bean has not been released. A developer preview does not count.
2. Android 4.1 Jelly Bean sources have not been released
3. Android 4.1 Jelly Bean kernel sources have not been released. Kernel mods are done on decompiled software which is never as reliable as modifying source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JaiaV said:
Where?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kernel source was released the same day that the google io attendies received JellyBean. since google released it, they legally have to provide kernel source according to the GPL. our kernel devs here all follow GPL as well, thats one of the requirements of xda to allow them to post their custom kernels. btw, source is where it always is. please dont insult our wonderful kernel developers.
From: "Jean-Baptiste Queru" <[email protected]>
Date: Jun 27, 2012 4:29 PM
Subject: [android-building] GPL components for the Jelly Bean preview
To: <[email protected]>
As usual, Android 4.1 ("Jelly Bean") contains a few components
licensed under the GPL or similar licenses. For the preview that was
just announced at Google I/O, the source code of those components is
available in AOSP.
The JFN53F platform components are tagged android-4.1_pre1 in their
respective projects. That's the version that Nexus 7 has in the box.
The JRN84D platform components are tagged android-4.1_pre2 in their
resepctive projects. That's the automatic update for both Nexus 7 and
Galaxy Nexus.
The SDK platform components are tagged android-4.1-sdk_pre1 in their
resepctive projects.
They are available with full source history. They are fully merged
into the master branch (except webkit). They all build on top of the
current AOSP master.
The Nexus 7 kernels are in the kernel/tegra project, under SHA-1
8dd2eab (in the box) and 55edff4 (the update). The Galaxy Nexus kernel
is in the kernel/omap project, under SHA-1 e8de0e2. They all have full
source history.
JBQ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

simms22 said:
kernel source was released the same day that the google io attendies received JellyBean. since google released it, they legally have to provide kernel source according to the GPL. our kernel devs here all follow GPL as well, thats one of the requirements of xda to allow them to post their custom kernels. btw, source is where it always is. please dont insult our wonderful kernel developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah...sorry for the incorrect info. I've been checking since I was corrected, and my git was broken and not pulling the source for 4.1.
Thanks.

whats the most stable JB ROM?

hi,
i know asking what rom is better is not a good questions as it is different for different people. However, I just want to know what is the most stable, so once I flash it i dont need to keep re flashing.
I am ussualy a fan of CM and when they get stable releases I flash them and then dont need to think about it anymore. on my previous samsung galaxy S I used the CM9 RC for a long time until the stable CM9 came out and then used that.
currently there is not stable CM10 and when it comes out I will probaby use it perminently.
What JB rom can i install that will be stable to use for the next months until CM10 stable comes out?
im using stock JB right now.

stock.

Zepius said:
stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok i understand. but i guess the main things im lacking on stock is percent battery, ability to alter the navigation bar at the bottom, adding shortcuts to the lock screen slider, and themes.
is there any way to do that on stock? if not any other rams as clock to stable as stock

stock

BAMF has been great. Not a ton of updates as there aren't any issues.

tgyberg said:
BAMF has been great. Not a ton of updates as there aren't any issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, what the heck is BAMF i searched that in the android development and dont know what rom your talkign about

Bugless Beast, 9-27 has to new binaries and is JRO03R.
Sent from my Nexus 7

Rasbeanjelly. Its the cleanest rom ever. Fast, amazing battery life and the latest aosp source. Also the nee binaries from jro03R. You should try it. It has the power widget, lockscreen targets and some more mods. If you dont like all the blue of the icons, simply flash modstorms white mod. Flash the rom + trinity/franco. The outcome is awesome performance, no slowdowns, everything just works. No reboots and sh!t. I highly recommend it.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

thegtfusion said:
Rasbeanjelly. Its the cleanest rom ever. Fast, amazing battery life and the latest aosp source. Also the nee binaries from jro03R. You should try it. It has the power widget, lockscreen targets and some more mods. If you dont like all the blue of the icons, simply flash modstorms white mod. Flash the rom + trinity/franco. The outcome is awesome performance, no slowdowns, everything just works. No reboots and sh!t. I highly recommend it.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with this. Rasbeanjelly + trinity kernel. The rom is very clean. Here's the thread, but you should read the faq before doing anything: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1455874

i love watching these cute pandas slaughter themselves.. nothing but pleasure.

hshaikh said:
ok, what the heck is BAMF i searched that in the android development and dont know what rom your talkign about
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1548940

hshaikh said:
hi,
i know asking what rom is better is not a good questions as it is different for different people. However, I just want to know what is the most stable, so once I flash it i dont need to keep re flashing.
I am ussualy a fan of CM and when they get stable releases I flash them and then dont need to think about it anymore. on my previous samsung galaxy S I used the CM9 RC for a long time until the stable CM9 came out and then used that.
currently there is not stable CM10 and when it comes out I will probaby use it perminently.
What JB rom can i install that will be stable to use for the next months until CM10 stable comes out?
im using stock JB right now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using AndroidME with Stock Google Kernel, works perfect, stable, actually it's a stock rom with improvements. The only thing missing for me is T9 Dialer, but no problem to install MOD for it.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1774165

Keep waiting for stable versions of aokp or cm10.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

hshaikh said:
What JB rom can i install that will be stable to use for the next months until CM10 stable comes out?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im using stock JB right now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You've already got the most stable Jelly Bean software then

stock, are you jellin, cm10.
after those you get into roms with more features and and there tends to be little bugs that sometimes go along with them.
Nothing against the others Ive had good experiences on alot of roms but as for the MOST stable these in my opinion would be them.

Stock ROM.
Beamed from my Grouper.

ok looking into BAMF and rasbeanjelly.
another question that could help me dicide between the two. do either have the possibility to upgrade the rom on the device without a computer. so when i install it i can always have the latest version without having to keep resetting to factory settigns and wiping all the data and cache

hshaikh said:
another question that could help me dicide between the two. do either have the possibility to upgrade the rom on the device without a computer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
all roms do.. that's why you have custom recoveries.. i strongly suggest you read efrants stickies before you flash anything.
sent from my i9250

Yeah, you should read up on some stuff before continuing anything Rom related. Just look for stickied topics, read them, and you will have way less questions left.

bk201doesntexist said:
all roms do.. that's why you have custom recoveries.. i strongly suggest you read efrants stickies before you flash anything.
sent from my i9250
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you sure? becuase when i was running CM9 RC2 on my old captivate, then the CM9 stable came out. I kept checking for updates in the settings and it kept saying my software was upto date. I had to download the new file and flash it again in clockwork mod.

Found a possible option to create a MIUI rom for i927

Hi everyone,
I just bought an i927, and I'm really looking forward to installing some custom ROMs. Above all, I'd love to see a MIUI rom for this device. MIUI is hands down my favorite Android flavor. What do you think about these instructions for creating a "MIUI PatchROM"?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1483332​It looks to me like it should be possible to MIUI-ify an existing stable ROM for the i927 with this method. What do you think?
Thanks, cheers.

interesting if you will to do this I would recommend you use the "[07.06.12]Osimood v2.06.07" ROM as that one is based off of 2.35 and has all bloat removed. Will make for a good starting point for you. you can find it at this thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1462298 good luck and I hope you get it working MIUI is a nice looking ROM
JB

sb56637 said:
Hi everyone,
I just bought an i927, and I'm really looking forward to installing some custom ROMs. Above all, I'd love to see a MIUI rom for this device. MIUI is hands down my favorite Android flavor. What do you think about these instructions for creating a "MIUI PatchROM"?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1483332​It looks to me like it should be possible to MIUI-ify an existing stable ROM for the i927 with this method. What do you think?
Thanks, cheers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would be interesting, but it's dated february and based on GB.
I think we should consider basing it on ICS: CM9 is coming, it should be easier (assuming CM9 works well).

Hmm, I was also wondering if those instructions would work for ICS too. I know that MIUI is currently running with the ICS base on other devices.
As for me, I doubt I have the skills to pull this off.

Is this still stands? It would be really cool to have MIUI v4 on the glide!

Someone recently mentioned wanting to give it a try in the CM10 topic, so it seems it's on!

Gab1288 said:
Is this still stands? It would be really cool to have MIUI v4 on the glide!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately I think I'm too dumb to follow those sketchy instructions that I linked to, which assume a huge amount of knowledge of the Android base system and its frameworks. But, for those who have already created ROMs for the i927 or even other devices, I suspect it would be relatively easy.

I though I'd look into trying this! I'll need some help from some willing dev' s and Linux gurus!
So far I have followed the instructions from get hub, synced the patchrom. Following the command to adb pull "stockrom.zip" from my glide is getting errors and won't make the zip.
I'm currently running the new UCLJ3 ics update that is rooted, deodexed, and zipaligned, with litekernel v1.1. I'll have to redo the adb pull to get the error, can't remember what it was. It was at the end when it was about to make the zip.
If anyone is willing to help, I'll post the exact error later tonight after work!
Sent from my SGH-I927 using Tapatalk 2

[ROM Request] SlimROM for A100

I use a SlimROM (see http://slimroms.net/ for more info) version for my phone and was wondering if someone would be interested in building a version for the A100/A101. It is very fast and includes a lot of feature, 4.1.2 or 4.2.2 w/3.0.xx kernel. Please let me know, Thank you.

DJ_SpaRky said:
I use a SlimROM (see http://slimroms.net/ for more info) version for my phone and was wondering if someone would be interested in building a version for the A100/A101. It is very fast and includes a lot of feature, 4.1.2 or 4.2.2 w/3.0.xx kernel. Please let me know, Thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should get their permission before even asking someone to kang it for you. A100 runs a 2.6 kernel btw.
Tapatalked from my HTC DNA

There is a contact form for "Customized Projects" here: http://slimroms.net/index.php/contact/11-customized-projects but I don't believe that they are actively taking new projects, though I doubt that they would have issues with it since many other Kangs running their sources. I really wish that I had the time, patience and experience to try to build it myself. If it doesn't happen, oh well, I tried.