[Q] GN II Sunspider Score? - Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Can somebody who already has their phone post a score from the sunspider benchmark?
Phonearena gave a score of 10xx in their review which is fantastic if confirmed. I know it's a rather meaningless score but it does goes to show Samsung are really spending resources optimizing the software over and above what Google has already done.

I got 1008...

1012.7

With Chrome = 1192.7
With default browser 1025,5

Thanks guys! Those are some great scores. The S3 in comparison gets 14xx with the CPU running 200 mhz slower.

1053 in the stock browser
1133 in the popup browser
Not as good as ifruit 5 but still really good
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app

1042.2 with stock brower
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app

Mine is 577 with stock and 495 with chrome.Overclocked to 2ghz tho.
With default 1.6 ghz is 587 with chrome.I didnt test it with stock but i guess it will be around 600 or so..

Yea, I'm resurrecting the thread, but this would be the only place to post my SunSpider results for a Galaxy Note II. I got 832.

Related

[ReF} ALL IN ONE BENCHMARK FOR I747!

As the thread says post your benchmark here! I will post mine once i pick up my siii from store:d!
5987 on AnTuTu. Kinda lame... Can't wait for custom Roms and kernels.
Here's mine
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium

			
				
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
...and after seeing that Quad core score I am all the sudden at least 5% less excited to get my ATT version...
Got 5K quadrant on I747 StoCK.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Ok I'm going to try to get all my CWM scripts and see if they work like they did for the SII. Here is my bench mark from my i777 and here is my current one for the i747:
This is complete stock scores for the i747 i've yet to start speeding it up.
I'm seriously thinking we need siyah kernel or something, dual boot aokp and touchwiz...I've still not figured the ' max OC we could even do to this thing per core...
This is all mine can do, running Ultimatum S3 1.0.1.1

[Q] Lemon Processor? [Solved]

After owning the Galaxy S3 for 2 months and doing lots of flashing of roms and kernels, I've decided that I have a lemon CPU. So my GSIII can't score over 6000 in Antutu, even at 2Ghz/Performance (it actually scored 4800 @ that speed), because the processor score is so low. The highest I've scored in Quadrant is ~5800, @ 2Ghz/Performance. I can't undervolt below 1050/1075 mv @ 384 because I get crackling when listening to music. It runs all smooth though. I had some performance issues in NOVA 3, but I think that was a rom issue. So, what do you guys think?
The rom you use will drastically change your benchmarking scores. For instance. I used to always get under 6000 in Antutu on every TW rom. OCd to 2 GHz as well. Now I am running JB CM10 and am getting well over 8000. No crackling in music while undervolt etc.
Your CPU is fine
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
g2tegg said:
The rom you use will drastically change your benchmarking scores. For instance. I used to always get under 6000 in Antutu on every TW rom. OCd to 2 GHz as well. Now I am running JB CM10 and am getting well over 8000. No crackling in music while undervolt etc.
Your CPU is fine
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried CM10 too though... About a month ago. Same 4900ish score. I got like 6000 one time on a TW rom.
Edit: I retract that. I tried the new JB TW rom and got 6000... with power saver... on Antutu. Maybe I just have a finicky CPU! Looks like for the first time ever, with the JB TW Rom, I hit a few points of 8000 in Antutu and 6000 in Quadrant... I don't know what the deal is. I have been trying different roms since the beginning of August and then today I tried a new one that worked for me. I guess I retract my question. Thanks!
Anytime! Remember those benchmarks can vary drastically even between test. A reboot could give you an extra 1000. Use them with a grain of salt.
Don't forget to use sunspider! Its a web based benchmark that tests your browsers speed.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app

One X - Lower Quadrant score / Android Rev. HD 9.7.2

Hi there,
It seems like everyone has 6000 in Quadrant on his One X , using Android Revolution HD, wich is stock.
I don't seem to get higher then 5350 in Quadrant, same thing happens for Antutu benchmark where I get around 12500,
and else get like 13000. I did a quick comparison and the cpu scores somehow looks lower then others.
I have a variant 1, stock boot.img android revolution HD 9. Anyone got an explanation / fix for this?
Thanks
Well, i heard that people say that Quadrant is not stable and chaining score all the time. I tested it and it's true Quadrant is not the best benchmark app. I can recommend you AnTuTu it's much more accurate and better!
It seems that my I/O score is half the score of someone else, I get around 5k instead of 10k
chmuts said:
Well, i heard that people say that Quadrant is not stable and chaining score all the time. I tested it and it's true Quadrant is not the best benchmark app. I can recommend you AnTuTu it's much more accurate and better!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not only that but scores are higher in the paid than free version, antutu is a better test as said, you should score between 10 and 12 k.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda app-developers app
treebill said:
Not only that but scores are higher in the paid than free version, antutu is a better test as said, you should score between 10 and 12 k.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Antutu should 'always' be higher than 12k since the 4.0.4 update.
It will only ever be less if battery is running low.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

Post your Sunspider benchmark results

Hello All, just wondering what everyone is getting
your Sunspider benchmark results. Here's mine @1.6 Ghz and 1.8 Ghz
Btw, I've been running @1.8 Ghz for awhile now with great battery life! Couldn't be happier with this phone 969 and 873
Sorry guys.. How do you attach your screen shots here?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using xda app-developers app
Already threads for benchmarks.
Post there.

[Q] Undervolting my HTC One X makes it slow as hell!

Hello!
I am playing arround with XM Kernel #235 and Black Pearl 5.0.1 ROM.
With stock values @ 1200MHZ AnTuTu scores arround 16000 but when i UV it - my phone gets uber slow (only on benchmark, not UI) and scores only 2500.
Even Subway Surfer seems to be strugling abit.
Another thing, I tried OverClocking to the limits.
This is what happened:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=39069291&postcount=3693
Hello
I have some questions regarding #235.
I am using it on Black Pearl v5.0.1
I tried to overclock as much as possible
3D at 766mhz
2D at 620mhz
EMC at 900mhz
CPU at 1500mhz
yet I don't see any difference on any benchmark except my phone is hot as hell =)
Is it possible those values don't stack?
I am not getting any reboot or lag or anything. Stable as rock.
Thank you for your answers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If anyone could help me, please do!
Thanks!
What is your CPU variant and how much did you UV?
Sent from my One X using xda premium
I have variant 2 using 1500MHz @ 1100mV.
Hm, what was the original value? I can't check right now...
Sent from my One X using xda premium
1237mV stock.
Try a milder UV.
Even -100mV is considered heavy UV so you should stick with values not much higher than that.
Sent from my One X using xda premium

Categories

Resources