Develop Bugs

AnTuTu Benchmark results

This is what I got
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA Premium App

Tried your app:
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Antutu benchmark results
Looks like the real samsung s2(9100) is almost on top.. What phone is sc-o2c?
Tmo Galaxy S2

The SC-02C is the Japanese version of the Galaxy S2, pretty similar to the international version, just with added 1seg receiver, and identical in peformance.
Would you mind doing a GLBenchmark test? Nenamark2? Electopia?

Im bout to post nenamark2
Tmo Galaxy S2

seems like there's no escaping it so might as well stick all the benchmark scores here and at least have them organized by app

I already posted them as a new topic sorry.
Tmo Galaxy S2

Here is mine.......

it's my

here are mines

I got a total score of 5583...

gdmlaz said:
here are mines
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How?
What's your set up?

Juggernaut V2, Synergy v0.02, interactive governor 1.83ghz

just completed

Juggernaut 2.0, bullet 1.8. I'm pleased.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Oops
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Here's mine. Juggernaut 3.7 1.8mHz with bullet 2.7 kernel = 6838. Beastmod is 100 less at the same frequency. With cm7 and synergy kernel at same frequency, I get 7111. Wow. Cm9 will probably be better. It may help the thread if we all use the same frequency. That way we can see which ROM and kernel produce the best results at that clock speed. All my tests were with the performance governer and min/max at 1.8GHz. All tests were done after a fresh reboot and all apps killed in memory.

these are mine
Running stock 2.3.5 and bullet 2.9

For some reason.... I get better results without OC my kernel to 1.83 weird.

I got around 6300~ Jugg 3.7 stock

Quadrant updated for multiple cores and ICS

Topics says it all. You should learn not to put much weight into these benchmarks, but the new update should give a clearer picture of our devices performance.
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.aurorasoftworks.quadrant.ui.standard
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

Thanks for the heads up!

Thanks. It's just like a dyno for cars. Just numbers.

Already a thread here, http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1495834

This is really strange. I have a similar setup as yours and get 3570.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
1350 max, francokernel. i used onDemand however in order to run the test.

franco 16.2 and AOKP 22
1350 ondemand ~2600

AOKP 23 with Trinity, 1350 max/min, performance - 3570 odd
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

chainfire only works if you have it enabled. Do you have a per-app profile for Quadrant? I get 3200ish with 700-1200 francoTurtle. I wasn't really expecting that much.

The two who posted the results .your 2d preference is massively different
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

Running CM9 with morfic's 1350 any kernel, got 3517
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

could you try with min 700mhz?

Scored 4039 with my Motorola Atrix 4G running CM7 and faux123's 1.45 Ghz kernal hack.

If you're curious as to how your results compare with stock (4.0.2):
A pitiful 1849

I got 2000 how do you get your I/O up? Mines bad/:
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

1350/700
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

italia0101 said:
The two who posted the results .your 2d preference is massively different
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I ran a lot of test and figured out the having "force gpu rendering" checked will increase your 2d score on quadrant.
I get 900-1000 with it enabled
I get 200-300 with it not checked.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

ericth18 said:
Scored 4039 with my Motorola Atrix 4G running CM7 and faux123's 1.45 Ghz kernal hack.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And we know how much garbage that phone was.
Goes to show you benchmarks are a joke.

Using CM9 with morfics 1536 any kernel
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Great, finally a proper way to compare our e-penises. Let's hope people still realize Quadrant scores are not a good way to compare roms... (or maybe I'm just saying this because my scores are rather low )

Your Benchmark on Quadrant Advance/Standard

I want you peeps with HTC Desire put a screenshot and/or write down your Benchmark on Quadrant Advance/Standard.
Write down your ROM and CPU clock too.
So please participate!
Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk

Here's mine:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I'm on BCM 3.7U0 ICS ROM and I had not overclocked the CPU so the clock as usual was 998 mhz.
Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk

And here's my Benchmark on the same ROM but with overclocked CPU:
This time my CPU was clocked at 1113 mhz (highest on the ROM) with performance governor.
Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk

I get in euroskank lastest rom, total score with ondemand governor and 998 mhz , 1034 score is that to low for cm7 rom ?
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda premium

Robi959 said:
I get in euroskank lastest rom, total score with ondemand governor and 998 mhz , 1034 score is that to low for cm7 rom ?
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to my benchmarks, your benchmark is toooo low but on Gb roms my benchmark was even worse!! It was 998!! That's why every developer is working hard to bring ICS on desire. You're seeing the difference yourself.
Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk

There is the diference in GB aosp and ICS ... very nice..
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda premium

GB ROM
But the actual speed its really good.
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda premium

vijendrahs said:
GB ROM
But the actual speed its really good.
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see you're on a sense ROM, which one is it?
Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk

ROM: IcS Beta_0.10.1 (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1355660)
Cpu overclocked to 1190MHz with governor: "performance".

My top score is with supernova ROM. It was around 2050, undervolted and underclocked.

tihimasmo said:
My top score is with supernova ROM. It was around 2050, undervolted and underclocked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean by underclocked? You've clocked so high that the system became unstable?
Sent from my HTC Desire with BCM 3.7U0 ICS ROM using Tapatalk

The opposite of overclocked

Alien2653 said:
I see you're on a sense ROM, which one is it?
Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Runnymede AIO 6.0.4
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda premium

Now using ICS beta 0.13.0
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda premium

Do you know that this doesn't have any sense at all?
Sent from my HTC Desire using flashes and thunders

[Q] CPU Way Lower that HTC One X on Quadrant Benchmark

This is my first Post, and i want to say thank you to all on this site. And thank you again.
I have the new CM posted 7/29. It's smooth and fast. Everything works fine except for youtube crashes when i press the volume button.
Does any body has the same issue? Any fix to this?
Also i ran a Quadrant Benchmark and i notice that the cpu reading is very low compared to HTC ONE X, That shows DOUBLE readings on CPU. Is it because the Quad Core of the ONE X?
Here are my readings:
Total: 4443
CPU: 5343
MEM:11200
I/O:3351
2D:273
3D:2046.
This is a great rom, i can't wait for the new release coming soon.

Lol. It's just numbers. Performance is different in the real world.
Sent from my T-Mobile Galaxy S III .

Quad core is nice but still useless I think on a phone. Dual core is getting every job done just fine. And like the previous guy just said... it's just numbers..

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hmm idk.. This is my score on free gs3 at 1.6ghz. Something to do with special dalvik sauce in stock roms.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

benefit14snake said:
Hmm idk.. This is my score on free gs3 at 1.6ghz. Something to do with special dalvik sauce in stock roms.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dalvik sauce??
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium

volcomguyaz said:
Dalvik sauce??
Meh ask the trinity kernel dev, I'm quoting him lol
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

...Classic!
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium

3DMark is on Google Play now!

One of the best computer benchmark app 3DMark is now available on Google Play:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.futuremark.dmandroid.application
Here is my scores:
(Faux123 Kernel 12tbu, Ondemand 1.7GHz mpdecision ON, GPU 487mhz, -137,5UV)
Ice Storm score: 8779
Graphics Score: 12826
Physics score: 4172
Graphics test 1: 55.9 FPS
Graphics test 2: 55.6 FPS
Physics test: 13.2 FPS
Demo: 60.5 FPS
Galaxy S4 (Exynos) and HTC One Scores:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
How is yours?

Sent from my Nexus 4

Overall score was 10058 for normal Ice Storm demo
4.2.2
Franco Kernel
Paranoid Android - latest version
no overlocks/undervolts.

[nexus⁴] [carbon1.6] [matr1x8] [twrp]

Stock Rooted :fingers-crossed:

CrazySpartan said:
Stock Rooted :fingers-crossed:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What so sorcery is this ?? I'm also stock everything, and rooted but scored only 9996 ?? any idea . Are you using some sort of app to increase performance ??

Mahalsk said:
What so sorcery is this ?? I'm also stock everything, and rooted but scored only 9996 ?? any idea . Are you using some sort of app to increase performance ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not using any app to increase performance. :angel:

R: 3DMark is on Google Play now!
My score is 10269
Inviato dal mio Nexus 4 con Tapatalk 2

Ice Storm Extreme on Stock Rooted :fingers-crossed:

CrazySpartan said:
Not using any app to increase performance. :angel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok second try I did a bit of an experiment and put the phone into the fridge for the test, killed all apps, set to airplane mod and vualla 11374 . :cyclops:
This is also stock rooted

XenonHD at 1.5ghz

One hell of a tool for computers. I've used it since its first versions.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2

Stock Paranoid Rom.

Stock 4.2.2
"Head&Pepsi"

Only got 4000 on my note 2
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium

Reading the Anandtech 3DMark performance review, it's awesome to see the N4 doing so well compared to the other devices.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6875/3dmark-for-android-performance-preview

Seems like the Nexus 4 is on the top charts across 3Dmark. Adreno 320 is still the fastest. Even the Snapdragon 600 uses Adreno 320.

My latest score with Faux Enhanced Stock

Oh yeah, 12017, i'm flying on top with Matr1x Gpu OC & Rootbox
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2

Sidneymac said:
Only got 4000 on my note 2
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cause it has the Mali and a9s.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app