Related
im ah noob but could we use the clrclad fix that tha hd2 guyz r using
Sent from my AOSP on XDANDROID MSM using the XDA mobile application powered by Tapatalk
I'm no dev or anything (at least not for our devices), but probably not. Could be wrong though.
Nope, the tp2 and hd2 are 2 different hardware so they got different things needed
is there any dev working on porting this?
Theres themes hopes this helps
Sent from my soon to be gingerbread evolution 4g
There are no Galaxy ROMs mostly because there is very little demand and very few developers willing to work on a port. It's general consensus that the UI is undesirable. However, I imagine a port would be possible.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Hello everyone, I'm associated with custom roms for sgy. Recently I met a person, who had successfully installed an sgy custom rom in galaxy ace. These two phones are more similar than we ever thought. So, why not the other way around??? Interested devs could actually modify ace ics roms and install it on y, instead of fiddling with galaxy mini????
Fantastic idea, I know, bit not improbable ...Coz I still have the Guy's pm ....
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
AvijitGhosh82 said:
Hello everyone, I'm associated with custom roms for sgy. Recently I met a person, who had successfully installed an sgy custom rom in galaxy ace. These two phones are more similar than we ever thought. So, why not the other way around??? Interested devs could actually modify ace ics roms and install it on y, instead of fiddling with galaxy mini????
Fantastic idea, I know, bit not improbable ...Coz I still have the Guy's pm ....
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy y roms can be installed on the galaxy ace i s5380i only by changing dpi and kernel but not on the original ace that uses the qualcomm processor and there is no ics for ace i
Enviado desde mi GT-S5360 usando Tapatalk 2
I wanna ask something....
How about safariking's CM9 Project???
Canceled? Aborted? Or Still in progress ?
Sent from my Phone !!!
Rikxzdjz said:
I wanna ask something....
How about safariking's CM9 Project???
Canceled? Aborted? Or Still in progress ?
Sent from my Phone !!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thread was closed but for now we should try to have a working CM7 instead of trying to build CM9
Enviado desde mi GT-S5360 usando Tapatalk 2
Porobu said:
The thread was closed but for now we should try to have a working CM7 instead of trying to build CM9
Enviado desde mi GT-S5360 usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah ... i'm just curious about the CM9... stopped suddenly...
How about CM7 Bugs ?? Bugs fixed list and bug list.... i was confused to the thread....
Sent from my Phone !!!
AvijitGhosh82 said:
Hello everyone, I'm associated with custom roms for sgy. Recently I met a person, who had successfully installed an sgy custom rom in galaxy ace. These two phones are more similar than we ever thought. So, why not the other way around??? Interested devs could actually modify ace ics roms and install it on y, instead of fiddling with galaxy mini????
Fantastic idea, I know, bit not improbable ...Coz I still have the Guy's pm ....
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no one ever try that but similar method has been done a long time ago for cm7. all running cm7 for sgy is ported from ace. wifi dead, bluetooth dead, graphic buggy, etc.
AvijitGhosh82 said:
Hello everyone, I'm associated with custom roms for sgy. Recently I met a person, who had successfully installed an sgy custom rom in galaxy ace. These two phones are more similar than we ever thought. So, why not the other way around??? Interested devs could actually modify ace ics roms and install it on y, instead of fiddling with galaxy mini????
Fantastic idea, I know, bit not improbable ...Coz I still have the Guy's pm ....
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As he said there are lot of bugs!! and by the efforts of devs it seems like fixing that is more tough than building a new one!!!
CM9 project Stopped! Sorry everyone can't get it to work whatever i did
Bad news.... :thumbdown:
Sent from my Phone !!!
safariking said:
CM9 project Stopped! Sorry everyone can't get it to work whatever i did
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No prob....u tried ur best....d main fact is that der can't be a CM9 for sgy....d best we can do is build a custom rom closest to it....btw, do u guys know if ace has CM9?
Sent from heaven!
anasdcool71 said:
No prob....u tried ur best....d main fact is that der can't be a CM9 for sgy....d best we can do is build a custom rom closest to it....btw, do u guys know if ace has CM9?
Sent from heaven!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree.... :thumbup:
At least we had a working CM7 is enough....
Sent from my Phone !!!
Rikxzdjz said:
Agree.... :thumbup:
At least we had a working CM7 is enough....
Sent from my Phone !!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ace have CM9
safariking said:
Ace have CM9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By galaxyics team ??
Sent from my Phone !!!
Rikxzdjz said:
By galaxyics team ??
Sent from my Phone !!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes! why?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1490867
Maybe he will try to port it beta 9 os the latest one from galaxyics
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Y don't those of you who are linked to the ace forum tell the devs about this???? I'm sure something IS possible ..
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Filip98 said:
Maybe he will try to port it beta 9 os the latest one from galaxyics
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It should be possible I will ask to maclaw
If ace has cm9, can't we port it to Y...both are arm v6 devices and d hardware is almost same too....
Sent from heaven!
anasdcool71 said:
If ace has cm9, can't we port it to Y...both are arm v6 devices and d hardware is almost same too....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you might be not aware the problem. here is the analogy. i have two notebook. both have x86 cpu, both have same lcd size and same resolution. my acer one use nvidia gpu and my asus one use ati. i can install windows 7 on both, but i need different set of driver to make both running without issue. and the problem not only for gpu, but almost for everything. the only one component where both can share same driver is cpu.
in phone world the situation event much worse. in pc world we have ibm-pc compatible. none in phone world. different type using different component and different soc. armv6 only cover cpu side. the other side completely different.
irfanbagus said:
you might be not aware the problem. here is the analogy. i have two notebook. both have x86 cpu, both have same lcd size and same resolution. my acer one use nvidia gpu and my asus one use ati. i can install windows 7 on both, but i need different set of driver to make both running without issue. and the problem not only for gpu, but almost for everything. the only one component where both can share same driver is cpu.
in phone world the situation event much worse. in pc world we have ibm-pc compatible. none in phone world. different type using different component and different soc. armv6 only cover cpu side. the other side completely different.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes but drivers are available for your ati gpu, your soundcard..
it will be something like a 'Frankalaxy' yes, but it would definitly be a start!
btw people must be aware of this but anyway here is an article on freeyourandroid/guide/porting-android .com [remove the space pls]
maybe this could help.
and yes the galaxy ace is closer to galaxy y due to generation of production
i.e mini/gio are old phones while ace and y are in the same generation.
Would request someone to try...
I'm from a pure symbian background and still learning android dev so....
would love if someone could lead to me some heads up article
[Google is my ally]
---------- Post added at 12:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:08 PM ----------
AvijitGhosh82 said:
Y don't those of you who are linked to the ace forum tell the devs about this???? I'm sure something IS possible ..
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using your next2ics rom and loving it
waiting for your next update
(you do have an experience in rom transgening so, why dont you try it?
would love have cm9 as d almostnext2ics update )
TBH this forum seems a bit lonely... and my EpicParts question was easily abandoned
Whatever, greetings and happy new year to every one out there!
Today I happen to dig out a Sense 4 ROM for our E4G which boots, doesn't reboot THAT often and is resized well (what, you want links? I think that's a private workspace and maybe I shouldn't tell). But what bugs me most is that SystemUI (statusbar) always FCs for no reason and I can't do anything with that.
So here I got a HTC Incredible S ("vivo", which is the port base for our Sense 2.1 ROM) with a fully-functional Sense 4.1 build. Everything's working and things are better sized for WVGA. And it's smooth. Considering it's a single core device, I think there is already no obstacle blocking the port (I know that Sense4All project paused because One X is a quad core device and gets all sorts of reboots. Correct me if I'm wrong).
Thus, I wanna ask, as a non-coding noob:
1) Is porting process the same as common tutorials (copying frameworks, libs, etc)?
2) If not, is this even possible (to have Sense 4.1 ported from vivo)?
3) If not, again, what can I do to improve my current build on hand (i.e. simply stopping the SystemUI FC and maybe adding more HWA)? I don't intend to use the ROM as a daily driver... Just a tool for showing off
So... Thanks again for reading the thread and hope you can offer some guidance
Sent from HTC Incredible S @ Sense 4.1
If there was a stable version of Sense 2.1 or 4.0, it would be my daily driver. I really hope this project isn't abandoned.
xDecapitator said:
If there was a stable version of Sense 2.1 or 4.0, it would be my daily driver. I really hope this project isn't abandoned.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2.1 is already very usable apart from BT (nah I don't use that), but many devs have already left or are silent. Must be with their new toys. That's why I'm trying to help. If I had time in winter vacation I'll try a bit, but hope not too high
And so I need some guidance and answers... Please. Even one answer will do.
Sent from HTC Incredible S @ Sense 4.1
AndyYan said:
2.1 is already very usable apart from BT (nah I don't use that), but many devs have already left or are silent. Must be with their new toys. That's why I'm trying to help. If I had time in winter vacation I'll try a bit, but hope not too high
And so I need some guidance and answers... Please. Even one answer will do.
Sent from HTC Incredible S @ Sense 4.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can try to pickup where our last dev left off,
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1717089&page=18
The issue last reported by xboxfanj was that he too, got many force-closes.
Shinydude100 said:
You can try to pickup where our last dev left off,
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1717089&page=18
The issue last reported by xboxfanj was that he too, got many force-closes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do want to, but I'm not a code dev and know almost nothing except that "brute-force" porting method, and I don't know whether that will work.
I mean, here I got a fully working Sense 4 build on a SINGLE-CORE device, so is this a proof that porting to us is also possible?
Sent from HTC Incredible S @ Sense 4.1
You ported sense 4 to an htc phpne which is much easier than porting it to something not even close to compatible with the hardware so it will be more difficult
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
phonehunter59 said:
You ported sense 4 to an htc phpne which is much easier than porting it to something not even close to compatible with the hardware so it will be more difficult
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But... I said
1) We HAD a now paused project that has ported Sense 4 and made it boot
2) I have a better Sense 4 base ROM (for our device, not HTC's) at hand with fewer random FCs
3) xboxfanj said that the port reboots because One X is quad core, and the ROM will keep searching for the extra cores. But IncS is single core and runs that beautifully (its port is based on One V and Desire X)
And that's why I'm seeking answers.
Sent from HTC Incredible S @ Sense 4.1
AndyYan said:
But... I said
1) We HAD a now paused project that has ported Sense 4 and made it boot
2) I have a better Sense 4 base ROM (for our device, not HTC's) at hand with fewer random FCs
3) xboxfanj said that the port reboots because One X is quad core, and the ROM will keep searching for the extra cores. But IncS is single core and runs that beautifully (its port is based on One V and Desire X)
And that's why I'm seeking answers.
Sent from HTC Incredible S @ Sense 4.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Part of the problem is that we couldn't port qualcomm roms which would be stable if they booted, but we never got it booting. Tegra is all intercoded into libs and looks for kernel files we don't have which causes it to reboot and be unstable.
Sent from my LG-LS970 using xda app-developers app
xboxfanj said:
Part of the problem is that we couldn't port qualcomm roms which would be stable if they booted, but we never got it booting.
Sent from my LG-LS970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...And why?
Sent from HTC Incredible S @ Sense 4.1
AndyYan said:
...And why?
Sent from HTC Incredible S @ Sense 4.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be honest, we never quite figured it out. We never got a proper logcat, since it only gave us unhelpful information, which means it doesn't even start to fully boot.
xboxfanj said:
To be honest, we never quite figured it out. We never got a proper logcat, since it only gave us unhelpful information, which means it doesn't even start to fully boot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And this means all my expectes efforts should be in vain, huh?
But check this, I got a Sense 4 ROM from marcusant's site and it's a port from Desire Z, based on One V seemingly. So far apart from all the hardware issues (wifi, cam, sensor), only thing that prevented me from sticking to it is that SystemUI often FCs. And I think that is another base to start on, since IT'S QUALCOMM.
Sent from HTC Incredible S @ Sense 4.1
AndyYan said:
And this means all my expectes efforts should be in vain, huh?
But check this, I got a Sense 4 ROM from marcusant's site and it's a port from Desire Z, based on One V seemingly. So far apart from all the hardware issues (wifi, cam, sensor), only thing that prevented me from sticking to it is that SystemUI often FCs. And I think that is another base to start on, since IT'S QUALCOMM.
Sent from HTC Incredible S @ Sense 4.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What it called? I must have made that but i don't remember
Sent from my LG-LS970 using xda app-developers app
xboxfanj said:
What it called? I must have made that but i don't remember
Sent from my LG-LS970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And I think that must be your ROM 'cuz I've never heard of Marcusant doing that...
It's SpiderSense.
Sent from HTC Incredible S @ Sense 4.1
AndyYan said:
And I think that must be your ROM 'cuz I've never heard of Marcusant doing that...
It's SpiderSense.
Sent from HTC Incredible S @ Sense 4.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that is just the original ROM but with modified app and framework.
xboxfanj said:
I think that is just the original ROM but with modified app and framework.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that so? There are two items in About Phone indicating phone model. One of them says "HTC One V", which I think is the port source, while the other says "HTC Desire Z", which is the device ported to I assume. I know that these can be modded, but why the hell does anyone take the trouble to mod it to Desire Z when we are Epic 4G? Thus I think it's a Qualcomm port.
Have you looked into it yet? Or maybe it's really your work and you know about it?
Sent from HTC Incredible S @ Sense 4.1
AndyYan said:
Is that so? There are two items in About Phone indicating phone model. One of them says "HTC One V", which I think is the port source, while the other says "HTC Desire Z", which is the device ported to I assume. I know that these can be modded, but why the hell does anyone take the trouble to mod it to Desire Z when we are Epic 4G? Thus I think it's a Qualcomm port.
Have you looked into it yet? Or maybe it's really your work and you know about it?
Sent from HTC Incredible S @ Sense 4.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had probably used the desire z build prop as well so it used some lines for our resolution. It's definitely my work. I remember making it..
Sent from my LG-LS970 using xda app-developers app
xboxfanj said:
I had probably used the desire z build prop as well so it used some lines for our resolution. It's definitely my work. I remember making it..
Sent from my LG-LS970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...So this means I should give up on that huh? Sigh.
Sent from HTC Incredible S @ Sense 4.1
You're only limited to the limits you place upon yourself, research, persevere, and you may get it working.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Shinydude100 said:
You're only limited to the limits you place upon yourself, research, persevere, and you may get it working.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the encouragement, dude, but Senior III is extremely stressful in China, so I don't have time to look into anything that serious for now.
Sent from HTC Incredible S @ CM10
I wonder anyone of devs thought of porting Ubuntu to our wfs, is there any one who tried if so share ur experienc.I m also interested in porting it. I reffered that porting section
Sent from my Wildfire S A510e using Tapatalk 2
There are 2 posts regarding this already....creating another would'nt help
So please,look around before you post
silly idea...
Sent from my HTC M7 using xda app-developers app
You're right. Ubuntu Touch's based on CM10.1, which isn't even stable. You can imagine that Ubuntu Touch would/will be even worse as far as performance, battery life and that stuff is concerned. But not only that... Don't forget that the WFS is a 2 year-old phone with 3,5 year-old hardware. Even if you managed to port it successfully, it would just be a... "nice-to-have", but not a daily driver.
we can't port or build ubuntu touch because we don't have sufficient NAND for it.
Guys lets not be too hostile towards poor Mahesh. He wanted to create a thread that would help us. No need to start offending his idea. I suggest that some of you apologize.
Really sorry to disappoint him,unless Ubuntu touch has the ability to boot like android on sd card,I think it would be able to work! I am not sure if Ubuntu touch will support that.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium