Hello,
I am currently testing a particular custom rom on my Evo 4g and noticed a couple of bugs but I can't post in the development forum nor am I a developer. Where can I leave the developers feedback about their rom or do I have to be a developer in order to do so?
Thanks.
Who's Rom is it?
This is my signature.
death-by-soap said:
Who's Rom is it?
This is my signature.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's TroNit's and Swiperrat's BlackICE Kangorade.
internalrage said:
It's TroNit's and Swiperrat's BlackICE Kangorade.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First read through the thread to see if your issues have already been talked about, then if you still want to leave feedback, PM him.
You could also get your ten posts so you can post in the development threads...
This is my signature.
Your best bet is to lurk in Q and A and answer some questions. Once you get to ten posts you will be able to post in the developers thread.
koker93 said:
Your best bet is to lurk in Q and A and answer some questions. Once you get to ten posts you will be able to post in the developers thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He'll have to beat me to it
This is my signature.
Related
I guess my noobness on this forum prevents me from asking my question in the development thread, so I have no choice but to ask this here. I just installed the EvoNonsense4.3.1 ROM last night and I'm loving it! Very Cyanogen like but with some sense things still in there. Great combo, IMHO. Just curious as to why the Build Number for this ROM shows up as EvoNonsens4.2? I verified that I did DL the 4.3.1 zip file, so no sure why the proper version is not reflected in the Software Information section. Anywho, loving this ROM so far. Very fast and everything is working great!
cloak.n.dagger said:
I guess my noobness on this forum prevents me from asking my question in the development thread, so I have no choice but to ask this here. I just installed the EvoNonsense4.3.1 ROM last night and I'm loving it! Very Cyanogen like but with some sense things still in there. Great combo, IMHO. Just curious as to why the Build Number for this ROM shows up as EvoNonsens4.2? I verified that I did DL the 4.3.1 zip file, so no sure why the proper version is not reflected in the Software Information section. Anywho, loving this ROM so far. Very fast and everything is working great!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can be a veteran and still should not post questions in the development section.
What you should have done is post your question in the evo non sense thread or pm the developer.....
Now your question is simple. The developer forgot to rename his Rom to the new update. It still is the newest but with the old name/number.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
Thanks for the info. Why is it that I shouldn't make a post in the development thread for the ROM? I figured this would be something that the ROM developer would be interested in knowing so that he/she could fix it. Guess I don't know all the rules for XDA yet .
cloak.n.dagger said:
Thanks for the info. Why is it that I shouldn't make a post in the development thread for the ROM? I figured this would be something that the ROM developer would be interested in knowing so that he/she could fix it. Guess I don't know all the rules for XDA yet .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can post question of a Rom in its thread. You don't make a new thread to ask a question about a Rom. It will clutter the dev section.
Now if you have a non specific Rom question that question can go in this section=q&a
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
Yeah I won't flame you for posting in my thread, promise. I forgot to update the build.prop. Thanks
tjohnsonjr said:
Yeah I won't flame you for posting in my thread, promise. I forgot to update the build.prop. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool. Guess I need to make a few more posts before it will let me comment in a development thread though. By the way, your ROM is awesome!! Gonna stick with this one for a while. Trying to promote it as much as possible on the AC forums.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Problem solved--Couldn't get Paranoid Android to get past boot logo. What solved it was doing a flash of CM10, then a 'dirty flash' of PA on top of it...I'm guessing that worked because it's CM10 based, but I'm not sure. Either way, there's the solution. Also, CZ, it won't let me edit that title to say solved. Also--any idea on my other thread about why Android File Transfer doesn't work anymore? Skyler, the last thing I need to do is annoy people--I can't even post in dev threads yet!
dubbactrumpetmsu said:
Problem solved
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's considered forum etiquette to do two things here, since your thread is solved.
1) Edit your thread title to include the word "SOLVED" with brackets around it. Like this:
[SOLVED] or [FIXED] or [IGNORE] or something similar.
2) If you fixed your issue, then you might consider typing what you did to resolve the issue, so the next newb-in-need-of-help can read your post and do the same fix.
dubbactrumpetmsu said:
Problem solved
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't do what the above said. It'll annoy everyone if you don't and I think that's great.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
Glad you go this worked out, but it was a known issue that was discussed yesterday right after the rom was posted. Also, this doesn't belong in the Dev section anyway. I'm glad you couldn't post there. Why does everyone think they should post their questions in the dev section when we have a Q/A section? You should have posted it here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1819441
dubbactrumpetmsu said:
CZ, it won't let me edit that title to say solved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you click on the "Edit" and then you click the "Go Advanced" option? That's what lets you edit thread titles.
Sorry, I can't help with the other question.
I fixed the title---and I would have posted there if that thread existed when I posted...as far as I can tell, it came about a few minutes after I posted, and I was already gone. I'll post in Q&A next time then.
Hello,
Im a long time lurker, but never post because I dont know enough to help anyone.
Turns out I need some help now.
I just switched to Revolt jb unofficial 20130713 on my epic 4g touch and I have no data. I have flashed fl24 modem
And I have switched to a known apks-conf.
I honestly dont know what else to do.
Thanks in advance for any help
Anyone?
Or did I post this in the wrong section since I cant post on the dev areas?
jfkreload3d said:
Anyone?
Or did I post this in the wrong section since I cant post on the dev areas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup. Wrong section. There is a specific forum for the E4GT. I have asked the mods to move this post there.
immortalneo said:
Yup. Wrong section. There is a specific forum for the E4GT. I have asked the mods to move this post there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks so much. I tried to post in the revolt thread in the dev area and since I didnt have enough posts I figured, I couldnt post in the E4GT area either.
Thanks again
jfkreload3d said:
Thanks so much. I tried to post in the revolt thread in the dev area and since I didnt have enough posts I figured, I couldnt post in the E4GT area either.
Thanks again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should be able to post in all the E4GT threads except Development and Original Development. They are here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1281
Anyone have any ideas?
Try flashing back to a ICS rooted stock ROM once your modem is set update prl then try flashing revolt again.
Sent from my SCH-R760 using Tapatalk 4
Is there a thread or guide for liquid smooth 4.0 rom?
Benholder90 said:
Is there a thread or guide for liquid smooth 4.0 rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't be serious that you started a new thread in the development section to ask this question???
Ask the builders in their threads. This will probably get moved or deleted.
page 2 dude, search button all over the forum.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/lg-g3/development/rom-liquidsmooth-v4-0-t2955089
purian23 said:
You can't be serious that you started a new thread in the development section to ask this question???
Ask the builders in their threads. This will probably get moved or deleted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes i dont actually know why i did that dont really know where to ask i suppose. Sorry for being stupid
rhystagram said:
page 2 dude, search button all over the forum.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/lg-g3/development/rom-liquidsmooth-v4-0-t2955089
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you!
twrp-3.2.2-0 on Android 8.1.0 Oreo or Android Development Preview DP4. Is it better than twrp 3.2.1-2?
Wrong section
This thread is unnecessary. We really don't need a new thread for TWRP discussions, as there really isn't much to discuss. Dee_Troy's thread works fine if something needs to be brought up
Akomack said:
This thread is unnecessary. We really don't need a new thread for TWRP discussions, as there really isn't much to discuss. Dee_Troy's thread works fine if something needs to be brought up
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@Dees_Troy
The last "Dees_Troy" thread, I saw, was for twrp-3.2.1-2. After, reading several threads with comments about twrp-3.2.2-0.
I thought it would be nice to have a thread for it so all the members could go to one thread for twrp-3.2.2-0 information. I respect your right to disagree. Further, if Dees_Troy opens a thread for it or updates his thread to twrp-3.2.2-0. I will ask the moderators to close this thread.
*Delete
Akomack said:
Similar to your question on the Magisk thread not being updated, the TWRP thread doesn't need a new title every time an update is pushed. @Dees_Troy is the lead dev of TWRP, so regardless whether or not the title or OP of the thread had been updated, I would still consider that one to be the 'official' thread for TWRP.
I highly doubt he's going to spend the time going through the dozens of device specific threads just to update the title/OP.
I don't want to start a pissing match, but to have multiple threads about the same thing is bonkers and only serves to muddy up the thread list.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@Dees_Troy
No, not similar to my "question on the Magisk thread" I asked if the thread was "relevant". Why? No one was using it. I know who Dees_Troy is, I think he can speak for himself. He doesn't need a mouth piece. So, since you don't want to start a "pissing match." Keep your 'tude' to yourself and stop posting.
Further, Dees_Troy took the time to update his thread to twrp-3.2.1-2.
Does it work with encryption on dp4? 3.2.1-2 didn't work for me with encryption on dp3
bkkzak said:
Does it work with encryption on dp4? 3.2.1-2 didn't work for me with encryption on dp3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, you have to remove pin, or password and it works.
Wrong section...
liam_davenport said:
Wrong section
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong section
Homeboy76 said:
Wrong section
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no development being done here. You are not contributing anything. That's why we have a discussion section, where this should go.
stebomurkn420 said:
There is no development being done here. You are not contributing anything. That's why we have a discussion section, where this should go.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah you're right. Moderator please move this to the "Pixel XL Questions and Answers forum."
Homeboy76 said:
Yeah you're right. How do I get it there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure a mod will take care of it for you just read a little further into the rules before posting in the future, this will save everyone time and clutter. I appreciate your enthusiasm towards our device and I hope this doesn't discourage you from participating!
stebomurkn420 said:
I'm sure a mod will take care of it for you just read a little further into the rules before posting in the future, this will save everyone time and clutter. I appreciate your enthusiasm towards our device and I hope this doesn't discourage you from participating!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I edited my post and ask the moderator to move the thread to the "discussion section." Thanks for your assistance. I'm blind in one eye and can't see out of the other. I'll read the rules again, I promise. Not discouraged, just disappointed I missed this in the rules. Thanks for getting me pointed in the right direction.
Homeboy76 said:
Yeah, I edited my post and ask the moderator to move the thread to the "discussion section." Thanks for your assistance. I'm blind in one eye and can't see out of the other. I'll read the rules again, I promise. Not discouraged, just disappointed I missed this in the rules. Thanks for getting me pointed in the right direction.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome! Sounds great! As far as twrp 3.2.2-0 goes, I haven't flashed it yet, I've heard nothing but positive feedback so far though.
Just so much win.
Phalanx7621 said:
Just so much win.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Thread closed by request.