Develop Bugs

CM9 Nightly Build

CyanogenMod 9 nightly build have started for some phones. I don't know if I am allowed to put the link but its some thing like this download cyanogenmod com/?type=nightly. I hope they add T989 sooon.

intenman1 said:
CyanogenMod 9 nightly build have started for some phones. I don't know if I am allowed to put the link but its some thing like this download cyanogenmod com/?type=nightly. I hope they add T989 sooon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is indeed good news! Here is the link to the Mirror Network, I have bookmarked it and will keep monitoring it! CM9_Mirrors-No_SGH-T989_Yet

Those look like alll devices with current stable cm7 support

so is this to say we have ics or not? because if we dont then the world knows we've been waiting on it hence thread is taking up space. not tryna be rude but really look back and see all the ics threads and you'll understand

nighthawk626 said:
so is this to say we have ics or not? because if we dont then the world knows we've been waiting on it hence thread is taking up space. not tryna be rude but really look back and see all the ics threads and you'll understand
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can assure you if this was in ice release for t989 thread it'd be a lot more poppin and surely there would be a development thread.. sorry to hurts your bubble man :-/
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

What is nighty build??
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Its a compiled build everynight
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

I am new to cyanogenmod, sorry for my ignorance. What version if any, is supported for the T989? If supported does it have wifi calling?
Thanks.

datzstr8 said:
I am new to cyanogenmod, sorry for my ignorance. What version if any, is supported for the T989? If supported does it have wifi calling?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im pretty sure that there is no CM support for the T989 as of yet

datzstr8 said:
I am new to cyanogenmod, sorry for my ignorance. What version if any, is supported for the T989? If supported does it have wifi calling?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM9 will most likely come once ICS OTA update is released for the T989.

chlehqls said:
CM9 will most likely come once ICS OTA update is released for the T989.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In most cases this is right but doesn't necessarily need to happen. Look at the g2x..... They will most likely never get ics from lg and cm arcee compiled a just about stable ics rom that is beautiful and works great. And thats with tegra being closed source to so drivers had to be a pain also. So we could see nightlys soon who knows we have no clue they could come out this week for all we know

I am sitting with a Skyrocket CM7 rom that isn't quite finished and isn't ever going to be finished just because I can't stand anything but...
CM9 will come...its only a matter of time, many talented people are working on ICS.

zander21510 said:
I am sitting with a Skyrocket CM7 rom that isn't quite finished and isn't ever going to be finished just because I can't stand anything but...
CM9 will come...its only a matter of time, many talented people are working on ICS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I doubt that CM7 will ever be released in more than alpha. The CM team decided to go straight to CM9 with this device which means they will not do CM7 and it doesnt seem like anyone outside of CM team would bother since nobody has up til now and I am pretty sure the chances of a proper CM7 build will only go down when CM9 is released. All you can do is hold tight.

Ya this was pretty cruel. Thought it was gonna say it was up and running ugh.

...............

H8
sent from my real Gs move in silence like lasagna

How many threads can we make about the same **** ?

KillaHurtz said:
How many threads can we make about the same **** ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+20
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Samsung Source + Jelly Bean Source = E4GT 4.1 Roms?

Sorry if this is a retarded question, but since Samsung dropped the 4.0 source for our phone, and JB 4.1 source code was released, does this mean that people can start compiling fully functional Jelly Bean roms for the epic 4g touch?
If so, is anyone working on one?

You've got it wrong. The samsung source that was released is ICS kernel source. That doesn't really mean much for jelly bean.
There is work being done to try to port it nonetheless.

revamper said:
You've got it wrong. The samsung source that was released is ICS kernel source. That doesn't really mean much for jelly bean.
There is work being done to try to port it nonetheless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought that you can run roms on older kernels...for example, CM9 is currently running on a GB kernel. Since 4.0 and 4.1 don't have as big of a coding jump, couldn't you run 4.1 on a 4.0 kernel?

alexthearmo said:
I thought that you can run roms on older kernels...for example, CM9 is currently running on a GB kernel. Since 4.0 and 4.1 don't have as big of a coding jump, couldn't you run 4.1 on a 4.0 kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Um, CM9 is running on an ICS kernel. FF18 to be exact.

sai5o4 said:
Um, CM9 is running on an ICS kernel. FF18 to be exact.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh...I thought the first few CM9's for our E4GT were running on a GB kernel, which is why people kept having soft brick issues. I guess i'm just uninformed. Sorry.

alexthearmo said:
Oh...I thought the first few CM9's for our E4GT were running on a GB kernel, which is why people kept having soft brick issues. I guess i'm just uninformed. Sorry.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol cm9 is ics.. your thinking of an older cm version.. cm10 is jelly bean
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app

the first couple of ICS ALPHA builds i think was running a hacked together GB kernel, then when the first leaks of ICS drop for our phones thats when the devs started using the pre build kernels that came in the leak ROMs. ICS and JB still uses a 3.0 kernel so from the source that was release devs can make JB ROMs for our phone from it, thats what CM devs have been doing to get preview builds of JB/CM10 on some phones. anyone can correct me if am wrong because am still learning about these stuff lol....but i think thats it.

well team hacksung just released a preview of JB for the international gs2. So that means that they are making progress on it and it must'nt be all that much of a change from cm9 to cm10. as JB has been out for what, almost a month now. and some people are getting cm10 previews, alphas and betas. so it must not be that big of a change in kernels. Of course i could be completely wrong in all of this, just IMO. well probably have cm10 sooner than we all think. our devs are awesome.

phpracing said:
well team hacksung just released a preview of JB for the international gs2. So that means that they are making progress on it and it must'nt be all that much of a change from cm9 to cm10. as JB has been out for what, almost a month now. and some people are getting cm10 previews, alphas and betas. so it must not be that big of a change in kernels. Of course i could be completely wrong in all of this, just IMO. well probably have cm10 sooner than we all think. our devs are awesome.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope your right. It seems like ICS are devs main priority right now.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

Once our device becomes officially supported by CM we will be on the natural progression towards Jelly Bean.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app

alexthearmo said:
Sorry if this is a retarded question, but since Samsung dropped the 4.0 source for our phone, and JB 4.1 source code was released, does this mean that people can start compiling fully functional Jelly Bean roms for the epic 4g touch?
If so, is anyone working on one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After all this time....CM7 and CM9.....we still aren't "officially supported"???? What is stopping us?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Edit: I just looked up differences.... the only differences are .22 inches larger and 4 capacitive keys. I'm not understanding why it seems so difficult... please someone enlighten me.

Qwallace70129 said:
After all this time....CM7 and CM9.....we still aren't "officially supported"???? What is stopping us?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source built kernel, which is what they are working on stabilizing.

Qwallace70129 said:
After all this time....CM7 and CM9.....we still aren't "officially supported"???? What is stopping us?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Edit: I just looked up differences.... the only differences are .22 inches larger and 4 capacitive keys. I'm not understanding why it seems so difficult... please someone enlighten me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 Well there is a difference of radios but I also dont understand how minor differences can make it so difficult to port from. You would think with the exception of radios & different key mapping that the architecture of both phones are exact, but then again I'm not a dev so there's probably some factor in there I'm missing.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

Chew DZ said:
+1 Well there is a difference of radios but I also dont understand how minor differences can make it so difficult to port from. You would think with the exception of radios & different key mapping that the architecture of both phones are exact, but then again I'm not a dev so there's probably some factor in there I'm missing.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The screen size is a minor difference. But, cdma and GSM radio is the big issue when it comes to porting anything from the international to us. At least that's the impression I get from the many threads I read.

Chew DZ said:
I hope your right. It seems like ICS are devs main priority right now.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ive been wrong before. i was wrong 3 times before lunch. im just speculating. whenever we get it is good for me. its ready when its ready.

Lets not forget half of our AOSP Developers do not even have this phone or acquired/reacquired the phone after the fact and do not have service on the device. Darchstar is no longer with Sprint and bought another E4GT with donations. Chris41G does not have the phone at all apparently.

Wheres everyone at

I have had this phone for a couple days and have tried every rom in the dev section, when nothing is extraordinary from stock.
Wheres everyone at? I know this phone is pretty popular, but we dont have alot of devs. The dev section is damn near dead. Not many selections
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app

fateownzyou3 said:
I have had this phone for a couple days and have tried every rom in the dev section, when nothing is extraordinary from stock.
Wheres everyone at? I know this phone is pretty popular, but we dont have alot of devs. The dev section is damn near dead. Not many selections
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What? You have stock, CM9, AOKP, and CM10. That's all you need.
Sent from my SGH-T999

joshnichols189 said:
What? You have stock, CM9, AOKP, and CM10. That's all you need.
Sent from my SGH-T999
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Besides, the roms we have are awesome and are constantly developed and improved.
We have some fantastic devs here!
Not sure what you're looking for op, but a good deal of the mods I can think of are already incorporated into many of the roms.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app

I can kinda see where the OP is coming from. On the G2X forums the stock roms were very very customized. These are all "tweaked" stock roms with little difference between the many... based off different bases, and have "build prop" tweaks and "init.d" tweaks, animations and so on. The att section has truly optimized and custom stock roms.
I don't mean to sound like I'm complaining cause I use aokp and cm10 mostly. But it'd be nice to have the extremely custom stock options like att users got.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium

With JellyBean around the corner, it will kinda slim for awhile, like the above post, all are stable that are there, and well maintained. I agree good devs here....

mt3g said:
I can kinda see where the OP is coming from. On the G2X forums the stock roms were very very customized. These are all "tweaked" stock roms with little difference between the many... based off different bases, and have "build prop" tweaks and "init.d" tweaks, animations and so on. The att section has truly optimized and custom stock roms.
I don't mean to sound like I'm complaining cause I use aokp and cm10 mostly. But it'd be nice to have the extremely custom stock options like att users got.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You and I both know a ton of customization was required to make the G2x usable. That is not the case with the GS3.

jcbofkc said:
You and I both know a ton of customization was required to make the G2x usable. That is not the case with the GS3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True. I'm also coming from the G2x and even tho we did I tend to stay closer to stock because I actually like tw. I will occasionally flash cm nightly just for ****s and giggles.
Sent from my SGH-T999

I don't mean customization for stability. I mean like whitehawkX edt tweaks and such. ATT roms have skipping tracks via long press on volume rocker and such. We have good stuff but it'd be awesome to have more options then different color stock roms. Most of the stuff I want is flashable any ways. Just a little rant... I'm just happy this thing is stable no matter what haha.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium

I wasn't trying to complain a lot. It was mainly what the above poster said. Just not a lot of variety like some phones have. Don't get me wrong, we have some of the best devs on the sgs3. I just like more options though
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app

In my opinion OP Android is maturing and the devices are much more usable than they once were with now just minor annoyances now.. There will be more development soon but the GS3 is enjoyable stock with tweaks for now... Such was the case with the OG Vibrant when Team Whiskey and Eugene tweaked and enhanced stock Twiz and the dev scene for that device took off and is still prevalent with the Vibrant being one of the first devices to run a stable JB... As a matter of fact because of devices like the Vibrant we have many of the staple dev names we see amongst many threads amongst many forums and for several devices including this one, for example Whitehawkx, Annex and others..
Stay tuned as I suspect it is going to be fun..

Those devs aren't focusing on TW at all. They have cm10 and variants to do and kernels to work on. Things are especially going to die down for a little with JellyBeen coming around the corner.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium

joshnichols189 said:
What? You have stock, CM9, AOKP, and CM10. That's all you need.
Sent from my SGH-T999
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't forget miui!. And op this is only a few months old. Dude our cm based ROMs 9/10 jb are stable As hell its crazy previous phones I had like s2 for instance had the echo bug data problems just crazy ****. The ROMs here are dd its crazy it will get way better when we get official jb and that should be soon. And we have some of the best devs in the game right now.....I love my s3

mt3g said:
I don't mean customization for stability. I mean like whitehawkX edt tweaks and such. ATT roms have skipping tracks via long press on volume rocker and such. We have good stuff but it'd be awesome to have more options then different color stock roms. Most of the stuff I want is flashable any ways. Just a little rant... I'm just happy this thing is stable no matter what haha.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want features of an AT&T ROM flash an AT&T ROM.. what's stopping you? They work fine if you set up the APNs correctly. I mean look at the i9100 forums. There's so many ROMs there but all of the touchwiz ROMs differ in what, a few build.prop lines and a theme? I'm not trying to attack you I just am not understanding what exactly you or OP are asking for. I understand some features aren't in our ROMs but like I said, flash an AT&T one if you want that feature. Or flash CM10, we have that feature

joshnichols189 said:
If you want features of an AT&T ROM flash an AT&T ROM.. what's stopping you? They work fine if you set up the APNs correctly. I mean look at the i9100 forums. There's so many ROMs there but all of the touchwiz ROMs differ in what, a few build.prop lines and a theme? I'm not trying to attack you I just am not understanding what exactly you or OP are asking for. I understand some features aren't in our ROMs but like I said, flash an AT&T one if you want that feature. Or flash CM10, we have that feature
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're stating exactly what I stated.
Only reason I flash stock based roms are for WiFi calling cause of some locations I work at... which isn't on any of the AT&T roms.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium

mt3g said:
You're stating exactly what I stated.
Only reason I flash stock based roms are for WiFi calling cause of some locations I work at... which isn't on any of the AT&T roms.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You said you mostly use CM10/AOKP but you won't flash an AT&T ROM because of no WiFi calling? You can set up WiFi calling on any ROM you want. I do it on CM10. Sure it is roundabout and not T-Mobile WiFi calling but it's still free and still WiFi calling.
Sent from my SGH-T999

joshnichols189 said:
You said you mostly use CM10/AOKP but you won't flash an AT&T ROM because of no WiFi calling? You can set up WiFi calling on any ROM you want. I do it on CM10. Sure it is roundabout and not T-Mobile WiFi calling but it's still free and still WiFi calling.
Sent from my SGH-T999
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not that big of a deal I prefer AOKP over all and I only work at those sites for a couple days a month so I just nandroid an old stock rom... not that big of a deal to me. I was just stating that I understand where the OP was coming from. I don't like setting up other forms of WiFi calling through third party apps.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium

joshnichols189 said:
If you want features of an AT&T ROM flash an AT&T ROM.. what's stopping you? They work fine if you set up the APNs correctly. I mean look at the i9100 forums. There's so many ROMs there but all of the touchwiz ROMs differ in what, a few build.prop lines and a theme? I'm not trying to attack you I just am not understanding what exactly you or OP are asking for. I understand some features aren't in our ROMs but like I said, flash an AT&T one if you want that feature. Or flash CM10, we have that feature
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good answer. Seriously. All of the stocks only differ by a color here and a icon there. Running the Cm10 nightlies, and seeing the new additions and fixes is what I'm impressed with. I am sure soon, we will see more roms being done with the cm10 base and others. My daily, is CM10 period. Seen enough of the stock stuff. HTC MyTouch took awhile, but was flooded later with some good roms.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium

TheAxman said:
Good answer. Seriously. All of the stocks only differ by a color here and a icon there. Running the Cm10 nightlies, and seeing the new additions and fixes is what I'm impressed with. I am sure soon, we will see more roms being done with the cm10 base and others. My daily, is CM10 period. Seen enough of the stock stuff. HTC MyTouch took awhile, but was flooded later with some good roms.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Man all I know is the cowgirls are going down this year. Watch out for them birds baby!

sarni84 said:
Man all I know is the cowgirls are going down this year. Watch out for them birds baby!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now why did ya have to jinx my boys?
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium

sarni84 said:
Man all I know is the cowgirls are going down this year. Watch out for them birds baby!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm a die hard Cowboys fan. Care to make a signature wager? Maybe adding logos of the winning team?

What the best rom to flash to with jb

I want to know who has the best rom with jb n the easys to put on s3 im already running jb on my phone but looking for some mods on faster cpu n undervolting anybody got any ideas
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app

galaxys3man30 said:
I want to know who has the best rom with jb n the easys to put on s3 im already running jb on my phone but looking for some mods on faster cpu n undervolting anybody got any ideas
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tw or aosp?
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app

That has got to be one of the most poorly written questions I've ever seen. With a mastery of English like that (did you mean "easiest" when you said "easys"???), how on earth do you hold a job that allows you to afford a smartphone? Holy crap. That seriously makes me sick. What's wrong with our schools...
And it's not even a real question... 'best' isn't an "at everything" thing, or there would only be one ROM, because the rest would all be 'worse'. You need a specific question if you are looking for any kind of meaningful answer.
I'm sad to say I'm interested in the answers to this topic, which is why I read it myself... let me try wording it better so that you don't simply get pummeled by people making fun of you:
Of the Jellybean ROMs out there:
What's the most stable ROM?
What's the ROM closest to stock Google Jellybean?
What's the most built-out, tweak-able Jellybean ROM (including features not in stock Google JB), and how does it compare in stability to the most stable ROM?
How do the new Sprint/Samsung leaks compare to these?

My bad I didnt proof read everything I sent it out but you say whatever you want not going to hut my feeling any I got other thing to do besides pick ob people instead of trying to help someone isnt that what this site is for to help people and pick on people and im running tw jb now but either doesnt matter to me just looking for a better rom
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app

There is only two sprint tw jellybean rom the leak one and then joshbeach came out with a jelly bomb touchwiz hybrid of the sprint tw leaks.
On the other hand original dev jb roms my fav is panadroid and then second fav cm10!
*
Rooted Evo dead.
Rooted Evo shift dead.
Rooted Galaxy s3 alive and well!

joshtycobb said:
There is only two sprint tw jellybean rom the leak one and then joshbeach came out with a jelly bomb touchwiz hybrid of the sprint tw leaks.
On the other hand original dev jb roms my fav is panadroid and then second fav cm10!
*
Rooted Evo dead.
Rooted Evo shift dead.
Rooted Galaxy s3 alive and well!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok where can find the panadriod? Thx for the info thou
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app

galaxys3man30 said:
Ok where can find the panadriod? Thx for the info thou
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1818793
[JB:CM10:HYBRD][GS3] PARANOIDANDROID [2.17, True HybridMode][10/04/12]
Just hit that thank u button haha but ur welcome!
*
Rooted Evo dead.
Rooted Evo shift dead.
Rooted Galaxy s3 alive and well!

galaxys3man30 said:
My bad I didnt proof read everything I sent it out but you say whatever you want not going to hut my feeling any I got other thing to do besides pick ob people instead of trying to help someone isnt that what this site is for to help people and pick on people and im running tw jb now but either doesnt matter to me just looking for a better rom
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Simply stunning. Man.
I did help - I reworded your question into something that people can respond to with meaningful help for you (and me):
geolemon said:
Of the Jellybean ROMs out there:
What's the most stable ROM?
What's the ROM closest to stock Google Jellybean?
What's the most built-out, tweak-able Jellybean ROM (including features not in stock Google JB), and how does it compare in stability to the most stable ROM?
How do the new Sprint/Samsung leaks compare to these?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Note the Sprint leaks are Touchwiz - should indicate a JB OTA update coming soon if you didn't want to install one custom. The latest ROMS are pretty clean - cleaner than the ICS final release leak for the Epic 4G Touch was, so that may be forthcoming soon.

Asop/Aokp vs Miui

I have used almost every single AOKP/asop ROM for this phone and have seen the good, bad and ugly. I prefer Xylon and XenonHD more that the rest. I have never used a Miui rom, not sure why.
Could someone that does use Miui give me a pitch as to why I should switch?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

miui is gross...
like a lame ios wannabe

crixley said:
miui is gross...
like a lame ios wannabe
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, yeah that's what I thought.
I wish sudo commands worked in real life...I'd never get banned from the pub again!

Im downloading latest MIUI right now to give it a go. Will post back with impressions in a while.

djluis48 said:
Im downloading latest MIUI right now to give it a go. Will post back with impressions in a while.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea def let us know!
Im honestly tired of everything out right now...just waiting for ubuntu now

insane08 said:
Yea def let us know!
Im honestly tired of everything out right now...just waiting for ubuntu now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure thing! Im on the same boat...everything is AOSP based right now...kind of boring. At least for flash-aholics like me.

I use aokp solely because of the nav bar mods. If cm offered that, I'd be back in a heartbeat.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

tokuzumi said:
I use aokp solely because of the nav bar mods. If cm offered that, I'd be back in a heartbeat.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. This is exactly why I prefer aokp over cm. I really wish that rom control could be integrated into miui. I would probably overlook the problems with miui if this feature was implemented.
Sent from my Google GSM Gnex using Tapatalk 2

Back with news:
Good news is that the interface looks really nice and its not as sluggish as i remember it. Bad news, it have an annoying bug in which the home button doesn't work, stock browser also won't work. Couldn't test much more because the home button bug was annoying, but everything else seemed to be fine.

Hello I recently rooted my phone and wanted to install a custom ROM but I don't want to brick my phone but someone told me its really hard to brick the galaxy nexus is that true?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

Android4Life2013 said:
Hello I recently rooted my phone and wanted to install a custom ROM but I don't want to brick my phone but someone told me its really hard to brick the galaxy nexus is that true?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes its true but make sure u read and re read how to root so you know how everything works. Not hard to do at all tho.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

DelTree© said:
I have used almost every single AOKP/asop ROM for this phone and have seen the good, bad and ugly. I prefer Xylon and XenonHD more that the rest. I have never used a Miui rom, not sure why.
Could someone that does use Miui give me a pitch as to why I should switch?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just try it out. Why would some random people on the internet need to pitch it to you. You are just inviting the trolls. Instead of being lazy, just try it and see what you think.

It's spelled Aesop. He deserves to have his name spelled right.

djluis48 said:
Back with news:
Good news is that the interface looks really nice and its not as sluggish as i remember it. Bad news, it have an annoying bug in which the home button doesn't work, stock browser also won't work. Couldn't test much more because the home button bug was annoying, but everything else seemed to be fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? Are you using the most recent OFFICIAL release of miui?
Wait.. if u have an lte gnex, this could be your issue since the sprint and verison versions get 3rd party ports of the i9250 version.
Anyways, I use miui and, while there is some interface lag compared with aosp, its still a great ROM. Aosp is hideous IMHO, especially since 4.2 came out.
Miui is very nice, even the stock icons look better than aosp.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

What's an asop ROM?
[email protected] hideous 4.2
Sent from my i9250

jordanishere said:
Really? Are you using the most recent OFFICIAL release of miui?
Wait.. if u have an lte gnex, this could be your issue since the sprint and verison versions get 3rd party ports of the i9250 version.
Anyways, I use miui and, while there is some interface lag compared with aosp, its still a great ROM. Aosp is hideous IMHO, especially since 4.2 came out.
Miui is very nice, even the stock icons look better than aosp.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you should own an iPhone

crixley said:
you should own an iPhone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah sure, just because somebody likes the graphic interface it means automatically he/she should get an icrap with all its disadvantages and ....wait pay at least twice as much for them. Brilliant!

jordanishere said:
Really? Are you using the most recent OFFICIAL release of miui?
Wait.. if u have an lte gnex, this could be your issue since the sprint and verison versions get 3rd party ports of the i9250 version.
Anyways, I use miui and, while there is some interface lag compared with aosp, its still a great ROM. Aosp is hideous IMHO, especially since 4.2 came out.
Miui is very nice, even the stock icons look better than aosp.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Noup. Im using the OFFICIAL for Gnex MAGURO, build by Xiaomi (The one found HERE). Im flashing 3.1.11, which is the latest according to that site. Using TWRP to flash. Might been a bad download, if you insist that its working fine for you, but i did a little research, and some people were complaining about the same bug, so i thought that it was the rom, not me.
EDIT: Just checked, and i highly doubt its a bad download because MD5 matchs with the one posted on the site.
bk201doesntexist said:
What's an asop ROM?
[email protected] hideous 4.2
Sent from my i9250
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its AOSP, and it means Android Open Source Project, in other words, stock Android, how Google thinks Android should be done.

bk201doesntexist said:
What's an asop ROM?
[email protected] hideous 4.2
Sent from my i9250
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The ignorance is strong on this one.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Ok, got MIUI to work. Seems like its not a good idea to flash the ROM and GAPPs on the same go. I had to flash rom, boot the phone, set it up, go to recovery again, and flash gapps, after that, everything seems to be working fine. Even the browser. Seems like that was the key.