From what I can see this phone is identical to ours. It's the Korean sgs2 lte and has source code released for ICS on the Samsung open source center.
Could someone maybe confirm this to be true or tell me why I'm dumb.
Specs: http://www.xdareview.com/samsung-shv-e110s-galaxy-s-ii-lte/
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
You might want to release this in the Skyrocket Forum as well, mate--unless you already have.
Those chaps have the LTE SII.
Will do.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Someone the skyrocket forum says the link might contain a javascript exploit so here are screens of the specs.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
I'm no coder, but I don't see where you are getting ICS from. The screen grabs show gingerbread and an older version than ours at that.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
me_is_rushin said:
I'm no coder, but I don't see where you are getting ICS from. The screen grabs show gingerbread and an older version than ours at that.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It says above you in the pic samsung touchwiz 4.0 UI thats only on ics
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
me_is_rushin said:
I'm no coder, but I don't see where you are getting ICS from. The screen grabs show gingerbread and an older version than ours at that.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=reposi...10s_galaxy_s_ii_lte_android_4.0_os_ota_update
looks like it has be update to ics. the op was trying to show the specs and i believe the page was old so it showed gb as the current os
me_is_rushin said:
I'm no coder, but I don't see where you are getting ICS from. The screen grabs show gingerbread and an older version than ours at that.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks like this is just a spec sheet for the actual phone. Source code would be on Samsungs open source website think he's just trying to confirm that this phone and the t989 are the same. Which to me looks like it besides the different radios
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
me_is_rushin said:
I'm no coder, but I don't see where you are getting ICS from. The screen grabs show gingerbread and an older version than ours at that.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those screens are just for specs. Go to samsung open source center if you would like to download the source for ics. For this device.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
This guy accidently flashed a skyrocket on his Korean version and it worked minus the buttons.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1562299
I think we're in business. If now some one could mod the kernel for a nice aosp kernel.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
billydroid said:
This guy accidently flashed a skyrocket on his Korean version and it worked minus the buttons.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1562299
I think we're in business. If now some one could mod the kernel for a nice aosp kernel.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
given that the tmo and telus ics updates are just a week away, and the source will be out the same day im told as well. i will wait for proper source. there are more differences in it then just the button code.
well our phone bee like the hd2
just saying, but this look like it could have the dual boot cm7 and cm9 with get correct source for the ics kernel right?
casonswag said:
It says above you in the pic samsung touchwiz 4.0 UI thats only on ics
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Touchwiz 4 was for gingerbread.
Sent with my T989D using XDA premium
Just wait for the release .... really..
VoiD_Dweller said:
Just wait for the release .... really..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I guess he is saying. The time it would take to rework the source into a smooth kernel would be pointless. If source for our phone is actually released in 7 days. Makes sense.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
-Mr. X- said:
given that the tmo and telus ics updates are just a week away, and the source will be out the same day im told as well. i will wait for proper source. there are more differences in it then just the button code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you going to be unleashing a Synergy 2 kernel for ICS? Because I'll **** my pants if you do.
Related
Does anyone know anything bout the open source yet!!??? I want it badly <3
Sent From my Galaxy S II T-Mobile
Dude. WE Talked about this in that other thread. Source dropped the same week the phone came out. How do you think we have the overclock kernels?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
mikeyinid said:
Dude. WE Talked about this in that other thread. Source dropped the same week the phone came out. How do you think we have the overclock kernels?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he is talking about the ICS KERNEL open source. But is way too early for kernel source for a phone that is not out yet.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
I thought it had incorrect files to where the touch keys wouldnt lght up and had problems with signal.... And.. The ics souce would come out around the galaxy nexus tine right?
mikeyinid said:
Dude. WE Talked about this in that other thread. Source dropped the same week the phone came out. How do you think we have the overclock kernels?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent From my Galaxy S II T-Mobile
phreshjoker said:
I thought it had incorrect files to where the touch keys wouldnt lght up and had problems with signal.... And.. The ics souce would come out around the galaxy nexus tine right?
Sent From my Galaxy S II T-Mobile
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not for our phone. We won't get ics kernel source til we get Ics, probably like may or whenever they get around to it.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Darn... :/ ill guess itll be worth it
mikeyinid said:
Not for our phone. We won't get ics kernel source til we get Ics, probably like may or whenever they get around to it.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent From my Galaxy S II T-Mobile
Why we don't have enough kernel devs like galaxy nexus or even evo 4g?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 Beta-6
I don't believe that ICS kernel source has been released, so there is nothing to go by. GB kernels probably fell out of favor since most of us are probably on an ICS leak.
Ummmmmmmm Becuz those devs chose to go to those devices. and not this one.
What am I chopped liver??? Did you not see my repacked kernels???
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
because development for this phone sucks relative to other phones. Even the 3d had more people when I had it. Not saying that our devs suck, just that we don't have a lot of them.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
ReActiveDisorder said:
Ummmmmmmm Becuz those devs chose to go to those devices. and not this one.
What am I chopped liver??? Did you not see my repacked kernel???
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty sure he meant aosp kernels not repacks and to op..... don't worry u guys will c a couple new kernels soon
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Why can't we get more people that complain?
sent from my Epic Touch
ReActiveDisorder said:
Ummmmmmmm Becuz those devs chose to go to those devices. and not this one.
What am I chopped liver??? Did you not see my repacked kernels???
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When did u start repacking kernel for our phone? All we had was steady hawkin and he left for galaxy nexus .
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 Beta-6
coldblooded79 said:
Why can't we get more people that complain?
sent from my Epic Touch
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
<sarcasm> Ya darn it. All the freely given hard work given to us by them is just rediculous. </sarcasm> ;-p
Because the ones we do have are freaking spectacular, so we don't need any more.
-1
10char
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
blackroseMD1 said:
Because the ones we do have are freaking spectacular, so we don't need any more.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know but we need more I have GSM galaxy nexus too I wish we had Franco or glados on our phone.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 Beta-6
digweed4me said:
I know but we need more I have GSM galaxy nexus too I wish we had Franco or glados on our phone.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 Beta-6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You missed one....and MAYBE he will help
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
aimbdd said:
because development for this phone sucks relative to other phones. Even the 3d had more people when I had it. Not saying that our devs suck, just that we don't have a lot of them.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We have AOKP, Codenam, Gummy, CM9, Sprint Leaks, MIUI, Slim, RubiX ROM, Calkulins ROM, Blazer Rom, Venums ROM, Rujelus22 Rom, MIJJz's ROM, Agat's ROM, Venum's ROM, etc......These have all been without source, which is freaking spectacular if you ask me. Please tell me how the development for this phones sucks. Wtf does the 3d have that we dont? I came here from that peice of crap phone. In fact, I turned down a swap for a gnex from a sprint employee because of the development on this phone.
JohnCorleone said:
You missed one....and MAYBE he will help
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Missed who trinity or popcorn tried it all but Franco and glados are the top of my list.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 Beta-6
shiftr182 said:
We have AOKP, Codenam, Gummy, CM9, Sprint Leaks, MIUI, Slim, RubiX ROM, Calkulins ROM, Blazer Rom, Venums ROM, Rujelus22 Rom, MIJJz's ROM, Agat's ROM, Venum's ROM, etc......These have all been without source, which is freaking spectacular if you ask me. Please tell me how the development for this phones sucks. Wtf does the 3d have that we dont? I came here from that peice of crap phone. In fact, I turned down a swap for a gnex from a sprint employee because of the development on this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gummy? Where?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
digweed4me said:
Missed who trinity or popcorn tried it all but Franco and glados are the top of my list.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 Beta-6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One of those 4 may help when we get source but that's all I say because its not for sure and I don't want different teams bombing his inbox with PMs to give it to them first for personal glory. I asked for help for all of us. Hopefully it will happen.
As far as development for this phone...very touchy subject. We do have some great devs. I don't exactly know how many could build a ROM from the ground up. I think its the limitations of the code that's available. You can click on a Google page to get all of the source code for their phones. GNex got CM9, Euroskank, Miui, etc in a week. It doesn't mean their devs are necessarily better but the pieces are there for them to use
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
Dev for e4gt has been nothing ahort of spectacular. We have so many Rom choices, once source is released devs with have a lot more to work with
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
Rob4828 said:
Gummy? Where?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It looks like TCP is changing his file hosting, but here is proof, and I have the rom...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1557113&page=242
No access to settings from notification bar and different toggles..
Is the only reason HD2's ICS rom is better is because it's running CM9, is that what makes all the difference? Because it'd be convenient if we had the features this rom had
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1434860
Also what's better in your opinion? Does Instagram work on these roms?
Infamous T989 0.2
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1645985
or..
ROMChicago - ChicagoIL3.1
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1602332
Check out darkside for more toggles.
Ours is leaked and has tw... It's not the vanilla one. We would need source. Cm9 requires source, but they're working on it regardless. You're probably looking for aokp. Check that out
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Simple because our phones are not supposed to have ICS yet. The first ICS leak came FOR TMOBILE about 2 weeks ago until that time we were using AT&T so we now have a compatible version of ICS. The developers are great they made a OS from another phone work on ours, now that they have the correct structure for T-Mobile give them some time they have lives too ya know, Darkside has a good stable rom and constantly improving it. ICS is about 93% fully functional now on our phones, and remember roms cut much of the bloat out that we dont need, etc.otherwise buy a Nexus
robandcathy said:
Simple because our phones are not supposed to have ICS yet. The first ICS leak came FOR TMOBILE about 2 weeks ago until that time we were using AT&T so we now have a compatible version of ICS. The developers are great they made a OS from another phone work on ours, now that they have the correct structure for T-Mobile give them some time they have lives too ya know, Darkside has a good stable rom and constantly improving it. ICS is about 93% fully functional now on our phones, and remember roms cut much of the bloat out that we dont need, etc.otherwise buy a Nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Android_Monsters said:
+1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't understand why people "+1" posts....just hit the thanks button?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
iLeopard said:
I don't understand why people "+1" posts....just hit the thanks button?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA
hiz99 said:
+1
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its more of an "I agree" respoce than a thank you.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
http://www.cnet.com/8301-17918_1-57488091-85/samsung-working-on-android-4.1-update-for-galaxy-s-iii/
Hopefully this applies to the US variants as well.
http://www.androidauthority.com/t-mobile-galaxy-s3-sgh-t999-android-4-1-1-jelly-bean-leaks-110179/
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
corythug said:
Samsung working on Android 4.1 upda...rking-on-android-4.1-update-for-galaxy-s-iii/
Hopefully this applies to the US variants as well.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The link doesn't appear to work for me,
Oh, and nice 1000 posts
Its because he hyper linked too much if you delete everything before the http to the CNET website it will work
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
for pete's sake
somebody post proper link
corythug said:
Samsung working on Android 4.1 upda...rking-on-android-4.1-update-for-galaxy-s-iii/
Hopefully this applies to the US variants as well.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately it says the the report wasn't confirmed by Samsung, and it also says that its still gonna have to go through the carriers... dunno how att is because I'm new but I know vzw is a huge Hassel when it comes to pushing through any upgrades. Hopefully the code Samsung wrote form its handset gets leaked though because then we will have the capability to flash it without waiting for carrier approval.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
bravomail said:
somebody post proper link
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.cnet.com/8301-17918_1-57488091-85/samsung-working-on-android-4.1-update-for-galaxy-s-iii/
Sorry was on break at work didn't pay attention lol.
Thanks for the proper link.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Despite the fact that it's not really official (no Samsung confirmation) it's still good news. I doubt this would be an invented news, there's gotta be some truth behind it... now as for the carriers' part in this, that's another matter!
I'm waiting for two things, first, the inevitable leaks, and second, the kernel sauce.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
id10terrordfw said:
I'm waiting for two things, first, the inevitable leaks, and second, the kernel sauce.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep yep. I actually like sammys work on ics this time around so I'm pretty excited to see then incorporate jellybean into the mix.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
corythug said:
Yep yep. I actually like sammys work on ics this time around so I'm pretty excited to see then incorporate jellybean into the mix.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
I thought the source was already out. Isn't that how CMX is being developed??
Yes but not for touchwiz'd jellybean and it's kernel source(when developed)
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
http://www.androidauthority.com/t-mobile-galaxy-s3-sgh-t999-android-4-1-1-jelly-bean-leaks-110179/
Official jb leak for tmo...
Sent from my SGH-I747M using Tapatalk 2
Hopefully we'll see an AT&T leak in the coming weeks, as I don't really think anyone here wants to wait for them to actually approve anything..
mdg071191 said:
Hopefully we'll see an AT&T leak in the coming weeks, as I don't really think anyone here wants to wait for them to actually approve anything..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My theory is that the Jelly Bean leak since is actually a Sammy leak and is still being worked on by Tmobile and AT&T uses the almost the same kernel both d2 the devices. The new jelly bean leak has LTE settings in it meaning that you can set AT&T LTE/PTA APN settings and use 4G LTE in theory. Their are risk because the leak contains a new baseband, you can always reflash back to an older baseband though so this is not the biggest deal. The update does not include a new bootloader so no worries their. And you can always flash back to ICS. In my mind this may be worth fixing up a few files to see if it works. I'm going to give a try. I'll report back.
Looking forward to what you uncover drew
Sent from my SGH-I747M using Tapatalk 2
I'll take a look - I think it can be ported without a hitch to i747.
bravomail said:
I'll take a look - I think it can be ported without a hitch to i747.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The system and everthing seems to copy over fine, it's the kernel that's giving me trouble right now. I'm going to work on it some more and see what I can find out, but by that time I'm sure an AT&T version will be out.
I'm still working on it and will continue.
What about using ktoon's or faux' JB kernel in the meantime?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
Once Jellybean is released, I wonder how long it will take before Key Lime Pie to be released. Jellybean has great features and wanting to know what features KLP has to offer. KLP might be android 4.2 or 5.0.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Is it really going to call key lime pie? (source?) anyways it just depends on what features it offers my gs3 is stock at the moment only cause I really need a reliable device and flashing ain't my cup of tea at the moment (I used to be a flashaholic) but I got a nexus and I can't wait for jb to come to the gs3 later on this month, the notification part is the most wanted feature and gofle now
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Although I'm curious as well, I don't see this thread lasting long before being locked.. Good luck
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
It's too early to talk Key Lime Pie (Android 5.0), the norm for upgrades on Android phones has always been 1 major upgrade and that's normally it. Considering Galaxy S III is a great device I highly doubt we will see Key Lime Pie and they will save it for Galaxy S IV (or whatever their next Flagship device will be called)
That's not true. The Nexus S started with Gingerbread, then got the ICS update and now it has Jelly Bean
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
From the Galaxy track record the next flagship phone will come with JB with a future upgrade to KL.
S1- Froyo to GB
S2 - GB to ICS
S3 - ICS to JB
S4 - JB to KL
Just my 2¢..
Powered by the SGSIII
verboten said:
That's not true. The Nexus S started with Gingerbread, then got the ICS update and now it has Jelly Bean
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't that a google phone? Google phones get that kind of love.
We have just gotten 4.1 and your already waiting for key lime pie or whatever its gonna be called ? Useless thread.
Sent from my SGH-T999V using xda premium
If only I could slap you...
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
From the Galaxy track record the next flagship phone will come with JB with a future upgrade to KL.
S1- Froyo to GB
S2 - GB to ICS
S3 - ICS to JB
S4 - JB to KL
Just my 2¢..
Powered by the SGSIII
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm like 99% sure they said job was coming to the S2
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
werdna87 said:
I'm like 99% sure they said job was coming to the S2
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed, at least thats what the major news sources are reporting
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2
jmwils3 said:
Indeed, at least thats what the major news sources are reporting
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So i think it would make a lot of sense if the GS3 did get KLP...
Take time to smell the jelly beans!
verboten said:
That's not true. The Nexus S started with Gingerbread, then got the ICS update and now it has Jelly Bean
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's more the fact that the Nexus is sold through Google itself too.
I wonder how long it will take until samsung galaxy s 69 release.
lazarat said:
I wonder how long it will take until samsung galaxy s 69 release.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Smh
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
ThC23 said:
From the Galaxy track record the next flagship phone will come with JB with a future upgrade to KL.
S1- Froyo to GB
S2 - GB to ICS
S3 - ICS to JB
S4 - JB to KL
Just my 2¢..
Powered by the SGSIII
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to put another hole in your theory, but the S1 started with Eclair.
lazarat said:
I wonder how long it will take until samsung galaxy s 69 release.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Way after iPhone 225...
---------- Post added at 09:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:36 AM ----------
lostintime7 said:
Not to put another hole in your theory, but the S1 started with Eclair.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but the 2.3 upgrade was for Galaxy S 1 "spin-offs" if you will... With so many Galaxy S variants running around it's kinda
hard to keep track of em all..
werdna87 said:
I'm like 99% sure they said job was coming to the S2
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
jmwils3 said:
Indeed, at least thats what the major news sources are reporting
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I literally just heard this on an AndroidPolice podcast yesterday. All but SkyRockets are getting it.
joe75 said:
Take time to smell the jelly beans!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. We dont even have "Official" Jelly Bean. Sure we have leaks but nothing official has been released other than the rollout to some internationals last week.
Let's be more concerned with a working JB and all the probable incrementals that come out afterwards (like ICS 4.0/4.0.3/4.0.4), than about leap-frogging onto the next OS.
Thread Closed