Hello! The rascream ROM is any good?
Depends what you're after. Its light, quick and close to stock, but lacks the customization of AOKP and the like. Only way you will REALLY know is if you try it.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
the best! especially when paired with trinity kernel.(of course its only an opinion considering every user has differing needs)
I have only heard of Rascream a few times. Is it full out AOSP or based on some other ROM? (AOKP/CM9/etc)
killyouridols said:
Depends what you're after. Its light, quick and close to stock, but lacks the customization of AOKP and the like. Only way you will REALLY know is if you try it.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just want speed and stability! The AOPK as to many things that I dont use... And battery life of course...
kompressorgpl said:
I just want speed and stability! The AOPK as to many things that I dont use... And battery life of course...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then RASCREAM is DEFINITELY what you are after! Pair it with the latest Trinity, and you'll see the goodness
Theshawty said:
I have only heard of Rascream a few times. Is it full out AOSP or based on some other ROM? (AOKP/CM9/etc)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its based completely on aosp, tweaked, with a few mods, and some light theming(black). its lightweight and fast!
btw, its for the gsm and verizon(toro) galaxy nexus(and nexus s too!) http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/rascream/
Thank´s guys! And about support?
kompressorgpl said:
Thank´s guys! And about support?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A solid D-Cup worth of support in the Trinity kernel thread
CMNein said:
A solid D-Cup worth of support in the Trinity kernel thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank´s! The Kenel i now that as a good backup. And the ROM?
kompressorgpl said:
Thank´s! The Kenel i now that as a good backup. And the ROM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's where most of the Rascream discussion is.
CMNein said:
That's where most of the Rascream discussion is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you so much!!!!
kompressorgpl said:
Thank´s guys! And about support?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
me, and some other trinity kernel users are rascreams support
I wish someone would port this rom to the sprint version.
simms22 said:
me, and some other trinity kernel users are rascreams support
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank's for the reply! Wheres is the official page of the ROM?
kompressorgpl said:
Thank's for the reply! Wheres is the official page of the ROM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/rascream/
crespo is nexus s, maguro is the gsm galaxy nexus, toro is the vetizon galaxy nexus. full is all languages, the other is english only.
simms22 said:
http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/rascream/
crespo is nexus s, maguro is the gsm galaxy nexus, toro is the vetizon galaxy nexus. full is all languages, the other is english only.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now this is what I call a GOOD ANSWER!!!!! Thanks!
It's a great ROM, before I switched to CM9, I had run it a few Days on without problems.
The ROM is just very minimalist and the like who, who is serving them well.
I've had AOKP, CM9, and RASCream.
So far, my best user experience has been with RASCream, as far as speed, stability, and battery life go.
I'm a DEVOUT CM user. But I also prefer to not use nightlies, as I use my phone for work. I'll more than likely jump over once it hits RC status.
in the meantime, I'm very happy with RASCream and Trinity combo.
Related
I need the best rom for my Galaxy Nexus. IF you can guide me to the best one, I would be very grateful. Thanks in advance. I need the download link.
www.Google.com
They got links to every rom
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
AOKP.... find it in the dev forums.
Lazure13 said:
I need the best rom for my Galaxy Nexus. IF you can guide me to the best one, I would be very grateful. Thanks in advance. I need the download link.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
honestly i think your rom will be the best and most awesome rom ever. Head over here to build it.
I have used ARHD and was very happy with it. I just switched to the Gummy ROM this afternoon and I like it as well.
The problem is no one has enough info from you. Different ROMs have different features. Because of this, "best" is largely opinionated. Read through the [ROM] threads in the development section. Try and get a feel for what features you want then ask around for which one people like the most.
My experience:
ARHD: Pretty much 4.0.2 stock. No visual changes, just performance enhancements. Nice and smooth ROM
Gummy: based on leaked 4.0.3 with major enhancements. Toggles in the drop down menu. Ability to over clock and under volt. I have not ran it very long, but so far really like it.
Hope this helps.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Nexus - Verizon 4G LTE.
k.electron said:
honestly i think your rom will be the best and most awesome rom ever. Head over here to build it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol
Sent from my SCH-I800 using xda premium
I was on ARHD 2.1.2 for a little while. It ran much better than stock. Then I tried bigxie's ROM and it felt much smoother than ARHD. I'm currently using it with Franco's kernel. While benchmarks don't really tell the whole story, bigxie's ROM with Franco's kernel is quite fast. I get over 3000 on Quandrant (vs 2200 stock, although I think it's an optimization issue) and over 6300 on Antutu (vs. 6000). I like it b/c it looks stock, but adds a few conveniences, like having the power widget in the dropdown notification menu for easy toggling.
From the research I have done AOKP seems to be a winner...I have no experience with it as Im waiting for the price on the gnex to come down before I pull the trigger. But its a very popular among the members I know who have switched to the gnex.
I've always know what AOSP is but what is AOKP. I hear that alot.
DammitCubs said:
I've always know what AOSP is but what is AOKP. I hear that alot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The answer is 3 clicks away
DammitCubs said:
I've always know what AOSP is but what is AOKP. I hear that alot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1428448
droidstyle said:
From the research I have done AOKP seems to be a winner...I have no experience with it as Im waiting for the price on the gnex to come down before I pull the trigger. But its a very popular among the members I know who have switched to the gnex.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Score one for the fellow Fascinate owner! If he can find one of the best ROMs available on the Gnex without even having one, the answer should be even more obvious to Gnex owners. I use the Toro version of AOKP myself and can confirm droidstyle's conclusion
Terminators run on Android
AOKP is simply the best one
Try the Milestone 2, its great!
Kang milestone 2, Franco kernel oc 1.35
Best I have used.
7000 antu score
120k browser mark.
Stable no issues great battery life.
Can't complain
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Using GummyNex and franco's kernel. Best combo I have tested so far.
I recommend AOKP as well Go to rootzwiki and get the latest build
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Android Revolution HD!!! great battery life, super smooth, but completely stock look - no bells and whistles
AOKP. Awesome extras, great battery life with Franco's kernel, and super stable.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
It's tough to say what is the 'best ROM' as different users want different things from a ROM, but personally, I really rate Bigxie and AOKP.
They are the only two ROMs I'd recommend for GSM Nexus.
Regards.
I know the OTA ROMs just started coming out, and want to know which kernel is the favorite/best for our new 4.1.1 Nexus'. Thanks!
Sent from my SGH-T989
bhowanidin said:
I know the OTA ROMs just started coming out, and want to know which kernel is the favorite/best for our new 4.1.1 Nexus'. Thanks!
Sent from my SGH-T989
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
all of them. try whats available, find which kernel your phone likes or that serves your purpose the best. there is no this is best answer. its different for everyone. personally, i use trinity kernel, and im a trinity pimp. but that doesnt mean that will be the best for your phone. try/use them all, make a decision then.
bhowanidin said:
I know the OTA ROMs just started coming out, and want to know which kernel is the favorite/best for our new 4.1.1 Nexus'. Thanks!
Sent from my SGH-T989
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Franco kernel for 4.1.1 and ICS
Sent from my Gnex {GSM}
spaceman860 said:
Franco kernel for 4.1.1 and ICS
Sent from my Gnex {GSM}
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Difference between Franco's and Trinity? (Beats looking through every page and post)
Sent from my SGH-T989
bhowanidin said:
Difference between Franco's and Trinity? (Beats looking through every page and post)
Sent from my SGH-T989
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
trinity is faster, better default screen color, smoother. but, again, every phone will have a different experience, thats why you should try them all out then decide.
simms22 said:
trinity is faster, better default screen color, smoother. but, again, every phone will have a different experience, thats why you should try them all out then decide.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know. Thanks for the info, guys.
Sent from my SGH-T989
I would like to know as well. Is there quite a bit of difference in battery life as well. I've been using LeanKernel for JB but haven't tested it much yet
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
What is the best ICS ROM for our galaxy w?
I've got a dilemma between flashing CM9, RemICS, Paranoidandroid and MIUI.
Can anyone give me a detail suggestions?
reddvilzz said:
What is the best ICS ROM for our galaxy w?
I've got a dilemma between flashing CM9, RemICS, Paranoidandroid and MIUI.
Can anyone give me a detail suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which of them is best is matter of preference. Each person will appreciate something different about any ROM, so the best advice is try all of them and pick which is best for you. At present they are all based on Arco's CM9, and I prefer that.
Sent From My Wonder on CyanogenMod 9
2g11 said:
Which of them is best is matter of preference. Each person will appreciate something different about any ROM, so the best advice is try all of them and pick which is best for you. At present they are all based on Arco's CM9, and I prefer that.
Sent From My Wonder on CyanogenMod 9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, okay.. I prefer to choose a ROM that's not much of bugs, could you suggest me which ROM?
Because when I read each of ICS ROM thread comment's it's confusing me to choose which is almost stable ROM because of the bugs
By the way thanks for answering
wrong section dude! you should ask in general section. not in development. btw, all others ICS rom will be updated according to arco cm9
I would pick CM9, its since the others just use CM9 as a base while the others are great I find using the pure CM9 much better.
No bugs? Go back to gingerbread. No ICS can give you that yet. Please do know that ICS development for Galaxy Wonder is still on alpha stage. And also post appropriately. This is development section.
Sorry I'm new on creating thread
And I don't mean with no bug, I said with not plenty of bugs
Okay thanks for the answers guys, just asking, sorry for posting in a wrong section
Just Another★Gamer said:
I would pick CM9, its since the others just use CM9 as a base while the others are great I find using the pure CM9 much better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah. pure CM9 is better. I have once tried Paranoid, it was pretty good too. it is more customizable than pure CM9 (I think you knew it). Im currently using CM9 build 6 which is pretty stable. the other ROM are based on CM9 build 5 anyway. so, you know the rule, build 6 is better than build 5 (literally), but in some case, it upside down. just flash any ROM. you will find your own answer.
azhiekurosaki said:
yeah. pure CM9 is better. I have once tried Paranoid, it was pretty good too. it is more customizable than pure CM9 (I think you knew it). Im currently using CM9 build 6 which is pretty stable. the other ROM are based on CM9 build 5 anyway. so, you know the rule, build 6 is better than build 5 (literally), but in some case, it upside down. just flash any ROM. you will find your own answer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Forgive a noob question, but...
what do you guys meanwE with "pure" CM9? Do you mean the CM9 as being developed by arco, or is there another source for CM9 on W?
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
pepoluan said:
Forgive a noob question, but...
what do you guys meanwE with "pure" CM9? Do you mean the CM9 as being developed by arco, or is there another source for CM9 on W?
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It means Arco's CM9. All the other ICS ROMs are modified versions of it.
Sent From My Wonder on CyanogenMod 9
^^,
CM9 Build 6.. I just installed it today and its working smooth and fast..:highfive:
UnicoIjo said:
CM9 Build 6.. I just installed it today and its working smooth and fast..:highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers mate!
Is your phone's camera working at all under this build?
yup!
itismeonline said:
Is your phone's camera working at all under this build?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup.. but a lil' bug on the VGA camera and the settings on the Camera other settings are not functioning.. Arco still great for this kind of development from the Build 1 to 6.. ^^,
just w8 for the next build.. and cheers!:highfive:
Wow! ARCO has a tough job! Kudos to him! We patiently await the results of his hard work.
As title.
Is it possible?
No, kernel must support this feature, but stock doesn't
Swyped on my Galaxy Nexus running AOKP with Franco Kernel, overclocked to 1.4GHz
kyokeun1234 said:
No, kernel must support this feature, but stock doesn't
Swyped on my Galaxy Nexus running AOKP with Franco Kernel, overclocked to 1.4GHz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bad news. are you sure that there is no way at all?
sblantipodi said:
bad news. are you sure that there is no way at all?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not that I know of.
sblantipodi said:
bad news. are you sure that there is no way at all?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not that bad. Flashing a kernel is easy as pie. Why not try it, if color control is that important to you?
sblantipodi said:
As title.
Is it possible?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes. build stock kernel from source, merge color control code from other kernel. it's gpl. dont claim it as your own of course, should you ever release it.
Sent from my i9250
bk201doesntexist said:
yes. build stock kernel from source, merge color control code from other kernel. it's gpl. dont claim it as your own of course, should you ever release it.
Sent from my i9250
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't call that a stock kernel any more though.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
i understood op wanted a stock kernel plus color control only. nothing else. no oc, normal gpu clock, etc. only way he can do that is to build.
but for sure, the most minimal of tweaking would consider such a kernel not stock anymore.
Sent from my i9250
Petrovski80 said:
Not that bad. Flashing a kernel is easy as pie. Why not try it, if color control is that important to you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because I want a stock experince.
Custom kernel's are often made by kids, generally they have features that I dislike and I loose the Google Experince that is the
reason why I have a nexus.
sblantipodi said:
Because I want a stock experince.
Custom kernel's are often made by kids, generally they have features that I dislike and I loose the Google Experince that is the
reason why I have a nexus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you feel that way, the method bk201doesntexist described is probably best for you.
btw, i dont feel that way. i think op is mistaken, and in fact being ungrateful.
Sent from my i9250
I like custom kernels. If glados is made by a child, Ezekeel must be a really smart one.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
sblantipodi said:
Because I want a stock experince.
Custom kernel's are often made by kids, generally they have features that I dislike and I loose the Google Experince that is the
reason why I have a nexus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a pure asinine statement. If you want Google experience then leave it completely stock. Adding color controls makes it not the Google experience any longer.
Not to mention you are badmouthing every hard working dev out there.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
Hey guys. I was wondering if anyone has thoroughly tested both Cyanogenmod 10 and AOKP with Jelly Bean. If you have, what are the performance differences, as well as the default theming, and most importantly, battery life. I'm currently on Bugless Beast which has no modifications, so I'm not really interested in which has more features, because I'm sure they're both full of them. Currently I get around 2 hours of screen on time (CDMA Nexus), which I consider good, so If you've experienced more than that on either of these roms, please let me know. I plan on switching to one of them when I receive some good reviews. Thanks
dsass600 said:
Hey guys. I was wondering if anyone has thoroughly tested both Cyanogenmod 10 and AOKP with Jelly Bean. If you have, what are the performance differences, as well as the default theming, and most importantly, battery life. I'm currently on Bugless Beast which has no modifications, so I'm not really interested in which has more features, because I'm sure they're both full of them. Currently I get around 2 hours of screen on time (CDMA Nexus), which I consider good, so If you've experienced more than that on either of these roms, please let me know. I plan on switching to one of them when I receive some good reviews. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1) Make a backup of your current ROM
2) Flash either AOKP or CM10
3) Try said ROM out for ~1 week
4) Make backup of that ROM
5) Flash next ROM and try it out
*** NO ONE can tell YOU what ROM is going to run best on YOUR phone. You use your phone different then other people and their experience may not be the same as yours***
This is not meant to be rude, but just the dead honest truth.
Seriously, if you're not into customizing, stock. Stock ROM, stock kernel, just stock. Unless you have Verizon since there's no JB update I don't think
If you really want either of them, here's my "short comparison"
AOKP: AOKP is probably one of the most customizable ROM out there. It has all the settings that I personally care for and use a lot. On top of that, faux kernel helps this ROM run like a boss! Not a smoothest ROM though to be honest. Also not all the features from ICS is in JB yet, so keep that in mind.
CM10: This also has a lot of customization, but not as customizable as AOKP. (That's only by few features though). CM is known for how stable it is. I personally had no issue with CM when running it on my GSM phone. However, there isn't stable version yet.
kyokeun1234 said:
Seriously, if you're not into customizing, stock. Stock ROM, stock kernel, just stock. Unless you have Verizon since there's no JB update I don't think
If you really want either of them, here's my "short comparison"
AOKP: AOKP is probably one of the most customizable ROM out there. It has all the settings that I personally care for and use a lot. On top of that, faux kernel helps this ROM run like a boss! Not a smoothest ROM though to be honest. Also not all the features from ICS is in JB yet, so keep that in mind.
CM10: This also has a lot of customization, but not as customizable as AOKP. (That's only by few features though). CM is known for how stable it is. I personally had no issue with CM when running it on my GSM phone. However, there isn't stable version yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What gives better battery life and a faster phone overall. Faux or Franco?
dsass600 said:
What gives better battery life and a faster phone overall. Faux or Franco?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That again you need to decide. Every device is different. I personally had better experience with Faux (Maybe because it is stock for AOKP? I dunno)
kyokeun1234 said:
Seriously, if you're not into customizing, stock. Stock ROM, stock kernel, just stock. Unless you have Verizon since there's no JB update I don't think
If you really want either of them, here's my "short comparison"
AOKP: AOKP is probably one of the most customizable ROM out there. It has all the settings that I personally care for and use a lot. On top of that, faux kernel helps this ROM run like a boss! Not a smoothest ROM though to be honest. Also not all the features from ICS is in JB yet, so keep that in mind.
CM10: This also has a lot of customization, but not as customizable as AOKP. (That's only by few features though). CM is known for how stable it is. I personally had no issue with CM when running it on my GSM phone. However, there isn't stable version yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What features has AOKP that CM9 doesnt? What kind of customizables? Thanks
dsass600 said:
What gives better battery life and a faster phone overall. Faux or Franco?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Faux, franco kernel makes my phone act up every now and then.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus on AOKP
CM10 for a stable, less buggy ROM. AOKP for customization. End of story.
Also, Faux kernel is my preferred kernel.
juanmaper said:
What features has AOKP that CM9 doesnt? What kind of customizables? Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never tried CM9, but if it's anything like CM10 M1, AOKP Jelly Bean latest build has a bit more features. But I could personally care less for. You should just backup your ROM and try AOKP if you ask me. If you don't like it, you can simply restore.
Cm10 to stable ROM and cleaner ROM aokp is a hacked rom
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
miketoasty said:
CM10 for a stable, less buggy ROM. AOKP for customization. End of story.
Also, Faux kernel is my preferred kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your joking right? Right?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Dsmforlife92 said:
Cm10 to stable ROM and cleaner ROM aokp is a hacked rom
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What kind of biased comment is this?
Swyped on my Galaxy Nexus running Black Bean with Franco Kernel
kyokeun1234 said:
What kind of biased comment is this?
Swyped on my Galaxy Nexus running Black Bean with Franco Kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its just not as clean as cm10 I don't mean it sucks. Its just the way they get all those custom settings are a little more dirty coding that's all I'm saying relax, people are too sensitive on this forum.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
I really like AOKP ICS. But I'm on CM10 and CNA now, the current builds from AOKP are too buggy and unstable for me.
Dsmforlife92 said:
Its just not as clean as cm10 I don't mean it sucks. Its just the way they get all those custom settings are a little more dirty coding that's all I'm saying relax, people are too sensitive on this forum.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At least explain your "findings".
Saying it's just hacked up and dirty coding is a little naive.
z7nz said:
I really like AOKP ICS. But I'm on CM10 and CNA now, the current builds from AOKP are too buggy and unstable for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't know what you're talking about. AOKP is very stable.
Sent from my Nexus 7 on AOKP, Trinity Kernel
JBSourcery - download it, flash it, mod it, like it, love it...
Both are great, although I'd recommend CNA. Now where's the lock?
Dsmforlife92 said:
Its just not as clean as cm10 I don't mean it sucks. Its just the way they get all those custom settings are a little more dirty coding that's all I'm saying relax, people are too sensitive on this forum.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, that's all I'm asking for. You shouldn't just put negative comment like this without any good reason. I really don't think it's necessarily to say AOKP is "hacked" you know?
---------- Post added at 06:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:15 PM ----------
Soldier-2Point0 said:
You don't know what you're talking about. AOKP is very stable.
Sent from my Nexus 7 on AOKP, Trinity Kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, but CM is a bit more stable in my taste. But nothing to write a book about AOKP is very stable, like you said.
You can't judge a rom if it isn't labeled as "stable" by the dev.
I am using AOKP since the
early ICS builds and i am using their JB versions now. They have tons of customization (and much more to come) and although they are considered nightlies (actually they are weeklies or so ) they are pretty stable and fast.
I have always used franco kernel with it and it is just great.
I currently use AOKP build 4 with franco r281, a black wallpaper, black theme and auto brightness. I get 4 hours of on screen time using the extended 2000mah battery. Besides the on screen time the rom is very battery friendly, with no random wakelocks.
Sent from my AOKP Nexus using xda Premium