Develop Bugs

Request for additional mod.

To xda team, can i request for an additional mod here? I feel that pg101 aint fair in deleting posts. Atleast if there were two mods, they will discuss it first before deleting. Thanks!
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium

Pg101 will delete this post
He he he he!!!!!
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA App

If he aint fair he will delete it before the xda answers.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium

I thought. Anant_6 is also a mod. I just thought
Sent from my GT-S5360

You're right dre,.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium

You should thank your stars. If I were a mod here many threads and posters would be out of here. He is more than fair.
Sent from my GT-I9100

rr2sd said:
To xda team, can i request for an additional mod here? I feel that pg101 aint fair in deleting posts. Atleast if there were two mods, they will discuss it first before deleting. Thanks!
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey rr2sd, don't forget I saw some of the posts that PG deleted and they were, how shall I put it "worthy of deletion". Not only that, I deleted a few more.
Even if we do add more mods as we do in forums from time to time, they simply don't have time to start disussing every deletion before acting.
Anyway, what's to discuss if there is trolling, flaming, or off-topic stuff being posted. Sometimes we might debate whether something is in the correct forum, but otherwise if a poster is neither contributing nor being helpful then they risk having posts deleted.
I fully expect that where a Mod is doing a good job, there will be a balance of folk saying he's too lenient and those saying he is too tough.
Mike
Forum Admin

How about this..before deleting any OP post,mod should warn members through PM
or thread 1st..If there is no action taken by the OP then mod can do his job.Fair enough
i think.

wow. got an infraction because of this. it was just disguised as a violation of the rule against personal attacks. lol.
EDIT: 2.4 Personal attacks, racial, political and/or religious discussions: XDA is a discussion forum about certain mobile phones. Mobile phones are not racial, political, religious or personally offensive, therefore none of these types of discussions are permitted on XDA. personal attack is stated but is not clearly not defined in your rules. as you have said (rule 2.1) what is ‘ok’ to say in your part of the world may not be ok in someone else’s part of the world. your rule goes back to you, what a mod may think is a personal attack may not necessarily mean it is a personal attack to the one writing it. for example, when i complain that i am personally attacked by someone, what are your criteria by which you decide that i am really personally attacked? is it a first come first serve/delete basis? ronnieryan complained first so that makes her right?
EDIT: 2.5 Courtesy towards other Members: Treat new members the way you would like to have been treated when you were a new member. When dealing with any member, provide them with guidance, advice and instruction when you can and always with respect and courtesy. Never post in a demanding, argumentative, disrespectful or self-righteous manner. I bet ronnieryan violates this rule in each and every post he makes, what have the mod done about this?
EDIT: i have read the rules over and over but i cant find something. just a question, wheres the rule against trolling mike?

MikeChannon said:
don't forget I saw some of the posts that PG deleted and they were, how shall I put it "worthy of deletion".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, the point of contention is, rather, that many feel that some deleted posts did not violate any rule.
as in the case of PG101 deleting a post on USB jig with technical info.
we should make sure to not get off THAT topic, specifically.
also PG101 appearantly deleted a very important post containing a SGY kernel bugfix wasting time of some devs.
kernel testing was severely delayed by PG101 killing that bugfix.
I rated this thread "5 stars" !

rr2sd said:
wow. got an infraction because of this. it was just disguised as a violation of the rule against personal attacks. lol.
EDIT: 2.4 Personal attacks, racial, political and/or religious discussions: XDA is a discussion forum about certain mobile phones. Mobile phones are not racial, political, religious or personally offensive, therefore none of these types of discussions are permitted on XDA. personal attack is stated but is not clearly not defined in your rules. as you have said (rule 2.1) what is ‘ok’ to say in your part of the world may not be ok in someone else’s part of the world. your rule goes back to you, what a mod may think is a personal attack may not necessarily mean it is a personal attack to the one writing it. for example, when i complain that i am personally attacked by someone, what are your criteria by which you decide that i am really personally attacked? is it a first come first serve/delete basis? ronnieryan complained first so that makes her right?
EDIT: 2.5 Courtesy towards other Members: Treat new members the way you would like to have been treated when you were a new member. When dealing with any member, provide them with guidance, advice and instruction when you can and always with respect and courtesy. Never post in a demanding, argumentative, disrespectful or self-righteous manner. I bet ronnieryan violates this rule in each and every post he makes, what have the mod done about this?
EDIT: i have read the rules over and over but i cant find something. just a question, wheres the rule against trolling mike?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ever your grudges against anyone mate (including mods), just a suggestion, try to resolve it via PM. .
In online forums, it best to ignore some people. What I have learnt by experience is I just state my point of view and leave it there. I don't go overboard to prove my point. Hence I never enter into an argument with anyone.
Happy XDA'ing. Cheers and apology if any of my comments hurt.

Princeomi said:
What ever your grudges against anyone mate (including mods), just a suggestion, try to resolve it via PM. .
In online forums, it best to ignore some people. What I have learnt by experience is I just state my point of view and leave it there. I don't go overboard to prove my point. Hence I never enter into an argument with anyone.
Happy XDA'ing. Cheers and apology if any of my comments hurt.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pm's arent transparent man. In this way they wont just ignore the issue. Pm's are one sided. I wouldnt want for anybody's post to just disappear when someone complains about it w/o having the oportunity to dispute said complaint.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium

rr2sd said:
wow. Got an infraction because of this. It was just disguised as a violation of the rule against personal attacks. Lol.:d:d:d
edit: 2.4 personal attacks, racial, political and/or religious discussions: Xda is a discussion forum about certain mobile phones. Mobile phones are not racial, political, religious or personally offensive, therefore none of these types of discussions are permitted on xda. personal attack is stated but is not clearly not defined in your rules. As you have said (rule 2.1) what is ‘ok’ to say in your part of the world may not be ok in someone else’s part of the world. your rule goes back to you, what a mod may think is a personal attack may not necessarily mean it is a personal attack to the one writing it. for example, when i complain that i am personally attacked by someone, what are your criteria by which you decide that i am really personally attacked? Is it a first come first serve/delete basis? Ronnieryan complained first so that makes her right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Watch your words and look after your posts and tell me if the deleted posts are not against me? Even now you shouted my name here?
Edit: 2.5 courtesy towards other members: Treat new members the way you would like to have been treated when you were a new member. When dealing with any member, provide them with guidance, advice and instruction when you can and always with respect and courtesy. Never post in a demanding, argumentative, disrespectful or self-righteous manner. i bet ronnieryan violates this rule in each and every post he makes, what have the mod done about this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you have evidence against me about what you are talking about. Go and report it.
Edit: I have read the rules over and over but i cant find something. Just a question, wheres the rule against trolling mike?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
simple off topic is already trolling. It doesnt have to be included in the rules. Its a universal rule that applies in all forums
---------- Post added at 06:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:08 PM ----------
rr2sd said:
pm's arent transparent man. In this way they wont just ignore the issue. Pm's are one sided. I wouldnt want for anybody's post to just disappear when someone complains about it w/o having the oportunity to dispute said complaint.
Sent from my gt-s5360 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you basically want ur posts to be vulgar right? To show the world you are never wrong?
BTW IF YOU HAVE COMPLAINTS TO THE MODS DONT DRAG ME WITH YOU..DONT MENTION MY NAME, IF YOU DO, THEN THAT CAN BE CONSIDERED PERSONAL ATTACK. BECAUSE YOUR THREAD IS ASKING FOR AN ADDITIONAL MOD, WHY MENTION MY NAME?

the kernel bug fix has been killed...now how can we manage to tried the fix for the kernel ? we waited this for so long and now it has been killed for no reason

loss of time accident
z3ro00 said:
the kernel bug fix has been killed...now how can we manage to tried the fix for the kernel ? we waited this for so long and now it has been killed for no reason
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am gravely concerned that admin PG101 might possibly not know what he is doing when it comes to removal action in our SGY dev section. He seemingly caused a huge loss of time accident.

ronnieryan said:
Watch your words and look after your posts and tell me if the deleted posts are not against me? Even now you shouted my name here?
if you have evidence against me about what you are talking about. Go and report it.
simple off topic is already trolling. It doesnt have to be included in the rules. Its a universal rule that applies in all forums
---------- Post added at 06:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:08 PM ----------
you basically want ur posts to be vulgar right? To show the world you are never wrong?
BTW IF YOU HAVE COMPLAINTS TO THE MODS DONT DRAG ME WITH YOU..DONT MENTION MY NAME, IF YOU DO, THEN THAT CAN BE CONSIDERED PERSONAL ATTACK. BECAUSE YOUR THREAD IS ASKING FOR AN ADDITIONAL MOD, WHY MENTION MY NAME?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.The question is not whether it is against you or not. It must be whether it is WRONGLY AGAINST YOU or not. You dont want to be criticized? You want to be an untouchable here that i cant post something against you? Wow.
2.My evidences have just become "post deleted" after you had your crying fit like a child.
4.define vulgar. I may not be always right, but im never wrong regarding you ronnie.
3. Now when did you become mike channon? Are you mike channon?
5.wow. Am i allowed to ask if you are stupid ronnie? Come on, can someone please explain to ronnie in a way that he will understand why?
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium

Nyahahahah I thought he understand that's why he's reacting like that
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium

rr2sd said:
1.The question is not whether it is against you or not. It must be whether it is WRONGLY AGAINST YOU or not. You dont want to be criticized? You want to be an untouchable here that i cant post something against you? Wow.
2.My evidences have just become "post deleted" after you had your crying fit like a child.
3.define vulgar. I may not be always right, but im never wrong regarding you ronnie.
4.wow. Am i allowed to ask if you are stupid ronnie? Come on, can someone please explain to ronnie in the that he will understand why?
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're allowed dude
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium

rr2sd said:
1.The question is not whether it is against you or not. It must be whether it is WRONGLY AGAINST YOU or not. You dont want to be criticized? You want to be an untouchable here that i cant post something against you? Wow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, i want to be untouchable by the likes of you, that is why we have rules
2.My evidences have just become "post deleted" after you had your crying fit like a child.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
your evidence deleted?
BTW your posts were deleted, not mine..
4.define vulgar. I may not be always right, but im never wrong regarding you ronnie.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you are always wrong about me, you dont know me, and stop claiming like you do
3. Now when did you become mike channon? Are you mike channon?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did i say so that i am mike channon? you should learn to respect that, why cant u get that in your head?
5.wow. Am i allowed to ask if you are stupid ronnie? Come on, can someone please explain to ronnie in a way that he will understand why?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no you are not allowed, maybe you have forgotten that you have agreed to the rules of XDA before you registered?
---------- Post added at 08:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:27 PM ----------
blackjack1942 said:
You're allowed dude
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
get lost, if you have nothing to say

ronnieryan said:
yes, i want to be untouchable by the likes of you, that is why we have rules
your evidence deleted?
BTW your posts were deleted, not mine..
you are always wrong about me, you dont know me, and stop claiming like you do
did i say so that i am mike channon? you should learn to respect that, why cant u get that in your head?
no you are not allowed, maybe you have forgotten that you have agreed to the rules of XDA before you registered?
---------- Post added at 08:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:27 PM ----------
get lost, if you have nothing to say
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow. All i can say is wow. You really are. I wont argue anymore. You have just proven my point.
Now to xda, please fix the deletion of posts. I wont complain about ronnie anymore. The concerns of mai and the others regarding deleted technical stuff are valid. They are the ones really helping in the development of the kernels. Thank you.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium

What are Junior members?

Seriously, what are those guys?
Sent from my E10i using xda premium

new members...I think members without fifty posts
lol for some reason i said 501

xmc wildchild22 said:
new members...I think members without 501 posts
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have 501 posts and I'm just a member.
Sent from my E10i using xda premium

X10minimandude said:
I don't have 501 posts and I'm just a member.
Sent from my E10i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that was a typo, he meant 50 posts. Junior members are from 1-49 posts I believe as well, then members are from 50-99, then senior member after that.
Edit: I confirmed that it is actually junior member from 1-29 posts, then member from 30-99, then senior member after that.

Post count
Junior members are 0-9
Member 10 -99
Senior member - 100 +

the snr member one should be higher, I don't consider myself as a snr member

Should be more ranks.. like Veteran and Ol´Timer. Also, It shouldn't be based on post count entirely but also on how long you have been a member.

Sindroid said:
Should be more ranks.. like Veteran and Ol´Timer. Also, It shouldn't be based on post count entirely but also on how long you have been a member.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No because I reckon that's unfair. Somebody may have been member for like three years but barely done anything whereas somebody who is has been a member for smaller amount of time can have a higher post rate but I do agree with the more ranks idea
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using XDA

Ranks should be based on helpfulness and amount of time here both. 3 ranks. Leecher---u just creep around never helping and downloading everyone's work without ever giving helpful feedback or learning anything. Member---u contribute when u can and have tried to help other members in a respectful manner, as well as being a member of xda for at least 6 months. And finally, Jedi---u have donated, helped members at every turn, have been a member for at least 1 year, have a post count of 1000 +, and at least 10 people must be able to give positive feedback about you here.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2

Phalanx7621 said:
Ranks should be based on helpfulness and amount of time here both. 3 ranks. Leecher---u just creep around never helping and downloading everyone's work without ever giving helpful feedback or learning anything. Member---u contribute when u can and have tried to help other members in a respectful manner, as well as being a member of xda for at least 6 months. And finally, Jedi---u have donated, helped members at every turn, have been a member for at least 1 year, have a post count of 1000 +, and at least 10 people must be able to give positive feedback about you here.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Positive feedback is only for buying/selling devices through the market and not everyone does that. Edit: I knew I had seen this earlier.
juzz86 said:
I'll sum it up for you (or try, anyway!)
There are Junior Members, Members, Senior Members first. These make up the vast majority of XDAs userbase.
Recognised Contributors are nominated by other users and/or Mods/Developers. They are recognised for their contributions which are not specifically Development, such as detailed guides, one-click utilities and other tools/mods.
Recognised Themers are also nominated by users/Mods/Developers, for their work themeing custom ROMs and providing standalone themes for flashing.
Recognised Developers are nominated and approved by the Developer Committee, for their work in Development whether it be ROMs, Root methods, bootloader unlocks etc.
Elite Recognised Developers are again assessed by the Developer Committee, and are deemed to have gone above-and-beyond in providing knowledge/hacks/tools/apps/ROMs for the XDA community.
Forum Moderators are appointed by the Moderator Committee, after submitting an application (see the 'sticky' at the top of this forum - currently applications are not open). They are the first-line of keeping the forums tidy, friendly and orderly.
Senior Moderators are the next step up the ladder, providing site-wide support for Forum Mods and looking after the nitty-gritty issues, as well as areas of XDA not policed by FSMs, such as the Marketplace.
Administrators are next. There are several Admins - each look after a specific part of XDA such as the Portal, the Members and the User Experience of XDA as a whole.
At the top is Mike Channon, who is overall Forum Administrator.
Other titles you may come across:
Moderator Committee - sits on the Mod Committee
Developer Committee - as above, but for Developer Committee
XDA Newswriter - publishes articles for the Portal (front page)
Retired xxxx - have since officially 'left' their XDA position
Hopefully that clears most of them up for you
Contrary to what a lot of people expect, the thanks-meter does not figure at all in determining a users tag.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

I personally they should have a rank called "XDA's Aid" and it should be you need to have over 500+ posts, have 750+ thanks and has a good reputation spelling and someone what helps XDAs users out.
As soon as I am a senior member I am going to try and become a moderator.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA

That is basically recognized contributer status but RC dpesnt have a minimum requirement I believe
Sent from my HTC Sensation using XDA

I.AM.H3RO said:
I personally they should have a rank called "XDA's Aid" and it should be you need to have over 500+ posts, have 750+ thanks and has a good reputation spelling and someone what helps XDAs users out.
As soon as I am a senior member I am going to try and become a moderator.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was a senior member for the longest time, now I'm A mod, hope to see in the mods sections in the future.

RCs DO have a requirement.
and going by post aint fair... see this.....
PG101
Join Date: 12th August 2008
6,297
JohnCorleone
19th December 2010
11,685
The red one are the number of posts... see the difference in date joined and number of posts...

+1, We have many users with 10k+ posts and they all came from the OT area.
-Grift- said:
RCs DO have a requirement.
and going by post aint fair... see this.....
PG101
Join Date: 12th August 2008
6,297
JohnCorleone
19th December 2010
11,685
The red one are the number of posts... see the difference in date joined and number of posts...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

lol PG is a mod and John is a RC ;p

-Grift- said:
and going by post aint fair... see this.....
PG101
Join Date: 12th August 2008
6,297
JohnCorleone
19th December 2010
11,685
The red one are the number of posts... see the difference in date joined and number of posts...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I'm a junior member and I've been here for quite some time...

TheRomMistress said:
+1, We have many users with 10k+ posts and they all came from the OT area.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And your point is....??
Sent From My Fingers To Your Face.....

Phalanx7621 said:
Leecher---u just creep around never helping and downloading everyone's work without ever giving helpful feedback or learning anything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I disagree with this category. "Just creeping around" i.e. reading a lot, learning a lot and sure, downloading, is exactly what we want newbies to do rather than immediately posting questions that have been asked before. If it's possible to categorise to that extent based on forum browsing behaviour, then I suggest this group be called Noble Learners.

Lol if you're going for posts, you could add in where you actually post. Normal XDA members can't access what amounts to probably 80% of my posts because they're in the special boards where you can't read them.
*singing*
nany nany boo boo stick your head in doo doo

User titles

First, i was a junior member, then ti member,now, a senior member. So is senior member the last rank in relation to post count??
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda premium

DioXCodec said:
First, i was a junior member, then ti member,now, a senior member. So is senior member the last rank in relation to post count??
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, to get any other rank you have to apply or be granted it e.g recognised developer/themer/contributor etc etc

Moved to About XDA section.

Here are the user titles explained by one of our mods.
0 to 29 posts - Junior Member
30 to 99 posts - Member
100 + posts - Senior Member
Originally Posted by juzz86
I'll sum it up for you (or try, anyway!)
There are Junior Members, Members, Senior Members first. These make up the vast majority of XDAs userbase.
Recognised Contributors are nominated by other users and/or Mods/Developers. They are recognised for their contributions which are not specifically Development, such as detailed guides, one-click utilities and other tools/mods.
Recognised Themers are also nominated by users/Mods/Developers, for their work themeing custom ROMs and providing standalone themes for flashing.
Recognised Developers are nominated and approved by the Developer Committee, for their work in Development whether it be ROMs, Root methods, bootloader unlocks etc.
Elite Recognised Developers are again assessed by the Developer Committee, and are deemed to have gone above-and-beyond in providing knowledge/hacks/tools/apps/ROMs for the XDA community.
Forum Moderators are appointed by the Moderator Committee, after submitting an application (see the 'sticky' at the top of this forum - currently applications are not open). They are the first-line of keeping the forums tidy, friendly and orderly.
Senior Moderators are the next step up the ladder, providing site-wide support for Forum Mods and looking after the nitty-gritty issues, as well as areas of XDA not policed by FSMs, such as the Marketplace.
Administrators are next. There are several Admins - each look after a specific part of XDA such as the Portal, the Members and the User Experience of XDA as a whole.
At the top is Mike Channon, who is overall Forum Administrator.
Other titles you may come across:
Moderator Committee - sits on the Mod Committee
Developer Committee - as above, but for Developer Committee
XDA Newswriter - publishes articles for the Portal (front page)
Retired xxxx - have since officially 'left' their XDA position
Hopefully that clears most of them up for you
Contrary to what a lot of people expect, the thanks-meter does not figure at all in determining a users tag.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[GUIDE] XDA New User Guide
Just to clarify I do not mean to imply that you are a noob or a new user. I know that over the next few weeks and months, new users will find this thread and hopefully will follow the link to my guide. Senior Member is the last title by post count.

Thanks for clarifying ranks
Sent from my SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2

I was wondering about this today
Thanks.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium

Hi, i was searching for member ranks and this was my salvation xD ty.

Thanks for clearing this up

very informative thread.. i was too wondering about this members-ranking. thank u

mikef said:
Here are the user titles explained by one of our mods.
0 to 29 posts - Junior Member
30 to 99 posts - Member
100 + posts - Senior Member
[GUIDE] How to be a New User (and not a noob)
Just to clarify I do not mean to imply that you are a noob or a new user. I know that over the next few weeks and months, new users will find this thread and hopefully will follow the link to my guide. Senior Member is the last title by post count.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey! thanks a lot for that!

So the ranks are just based on how many posts you have made? And are there any benefits to these ranks? Or are they just kinda there?

wstruction said:
So the ranks are just based on how many posts you have made? And are there any benefits to these ranks? Or are they just kinda there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think some is based on post while other is base on your role on this forum (and it must be assign by admin)

visionerator said:
i think some is based on post while other is base on your role on this forum (and it must be assign by admin)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I'd say you're right on that one

Thanks!
So are there privileges to being senior member over normal member?

wacky.ddw said:
Thanks!
So are there privileges to being senior member over normal member?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do get a few...
* Larger pm inbox.
* Different title.
* Bragging rights

thanks a lot for the details

Anthrax forum

Just curious how many people here actually joined and have been able to download that kernal... I have been on it for 3 days and still haven't been approved. Even though I have made at least 10 post.. It is another site with interesting chit chat from other peoples point of view (which is why I have joined many forums) but the first forum my post can't even be seen yet by me or others..

You probably shouldn't have made this thread.
Check your PM
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Thanks for the heads up.

Thread cleaned and closed
I will not tolerate bashing of any developer
Especially if it will create drama here
Also Anthrax discussion is not allowed on XDA and should be taken to the site where it can be found
Please respect the developer's and XDA's wishes and seek support there.
It is OK to mention Anthrax and even add to your sig but no links or lengthy discussions
Thank you for your cooperation
Friendly Neighborhood Moderator

Change "Min.10 posts policy"

Hi
I am a junior member of XDA but I have a good experience of flashing ROMs. But the problem is that I cannot post any review/reply about that ROM due to this policy by which you should have minimum 10 posts. I understand that development-purpose threads are for developers but this policy restricts us to do any sort of development-related discussion even if we are capable of doing so. So I would request XDA to please remove the policy. Thanks.

Oh great. Another one of these threads...
It's only 10 posts. It's NOT 50, 100 or anything. It's ONLY 10. You're already half way there so go and help some people in your devices Q&A section to get your other 5 posts.
If your excuse is going to be that you haven't got the knowledge to help people out, then you have no need to post in development.
In fact, I pretty much guarantee you'll have nothing relevant to post in a development thread anyway.

KidCarter93 said:
Oh great. Another one of these threads...
It's only 10 posts. It's NOT 50, 100 or anything. It's ONLY 10. You're already half way there so go and help some people in your devices Q&A section to get your other 5 posts.
If your excuse is going to be that you haven't got the knowledge to help people out, then you have no need to post in development.
In fact, I pretty much guarantee you'll have nothing relevant to post in a development thread anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Amen...I mean I agree.

ruchirshah1401 said:
Hi
I am a junior member of XDA but I have a good experience of flashing ROMs. But the problem is that I cannot post any review/reply about that ROM due to this policy by which you should have minimum 10 posts. I understand that development-purpose threads are for developers but this policy restricts us to do any sort of development-related discussion even if we are capable of doing so. So I would request XDA to please remove the policy. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All the mods want to hunt you down and kill you, but they aren't allowed to acknowledge this in public

Re: It probably happened to you too.....
I was thinking for full form of xda...
Sent from my GT-S6102 using xda app-developers app

junaid90 said:
I was thinking for full form of xda...
Sent from my GT-S6102 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No full-form.
XDA was a HTC device back in the PDA days, and that device was responsible for the birth of this site. More Info.

ruchirshah1401 said:
Hi
I am a junior member of XDA but I have a good experience of flashing ROMs. But the problem is that I cannot post any review/reply about that ROM due to this policy by which you should have minimum 10 posts. I understand that development-purpose threads are for developers but this policy restricts us to do any sort of development-related discussion even if we are capable of doing so. So I would request XDA to please remove the policy. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you can contact an administrator or senior mod, they may be able to help lift your restrictions. But you have to be able to convince them that you are knowledgeable. This is not guaranteed. Easiest thing to do is to hang out in the General Forums and help other new members so as to attain your 10 posts.
I'm personally tired of threads like these. Funny, I don't see anyone anywhere complaining about lifes rules. What's the difference here? Everyone here had to adhere to this rule, why should you or anyone else be any different? I just don't get it...

Ohh!!
Sent from my GT-S6102 using xda app-developers app

Well, removing isn't really an option, that would allow idiots to spam noob questions after 1 day.
But I've been here since mid 2011, been reading a lot, just not posting anything.
And I still have to meet the 10 posts rule. Maybe it's an idea to have either 10 posts, or being on the forum for a certain amount of time and have an x amount of pageviews or something.
Nonetheless, rules are rules, and rules are not to be broken :good:

For all you 10 post whiners in this thread, have a look at this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2166989
A thread created by a new member. 4 of his 5 posts are uuseless threads ffor which answers can be easily found by a bit of searching, what would happen now if this Guy was let loose in the development forum? I am not saying that all of you are like this. I have also seen some members whose first post was an extremely informative thread, but that's at a minority. Rules are rules and they are there for a reason, i realized this after staying on xda for more than 1.5yrs

ruchirshah1401 said:
I would request XDA to please remove the policy. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No can do.
Sent From My Fingers To Your Face......