Does using setCPU with the Tegra 3 and it's 5th core muck up the Tegra 3's native power saving capability (ie. using the fifth core as a low energy solution for minimal activities)?
Has anyone seen tests of battery use with and without?
What I have seen from my use over the past week or so with SetCPU is that you can set the governor and the minimum clock both of which have an effect (although minimum clock is not strictly adhered to).
I don't believe the 5th core is exposed to the android OS so SetCPU shouldn't effect that at all.
I'm testing the beta and no it does not effect the max 100% of the time the tegra power management seems to kick in. I have informed mike (setcpu author) about this issue he is looking in to it.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
I guess set cpu is not supported quad core yet
As James pointed out, the 5th Slave core is Transparent and not visible to Android, so it 'shouldn't' be effected by SetCpu
nibbleart said:
I guess set cpu is not supported quad core yet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It supports quad core CPU scaling, the question is about the 5th core.
That the 5th core is invisible does make it seem like it wouldn't effect this issue, however I would like to understand a bit more about how it works to be sure.
From what I understand, when processor use is low and the CPU is scaled below 500mhz(?) then the 5th core alone is used, whereas at higher frequencies the other 4 cores are fully engaged.
I would just be worried that setting the CPU speed through methods other than whatever method HTC/nvidia had arranged for might negate this benefit. It'd be good to know from the setCPU guy what's going on, since he likely understands a lot about how CPU scaling works...
Here's my Feedback on using SetCPU with HOX:
When trying to underclock my phone
Max: 1000 Min:51
Result: rebooted within 5 minutes and then kept on doing this untill I reset the SetCpu settings to phone defaults and uninstalled
similar user experience here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1596992&highlight=setcpu
I have seen that there is an app created for the HOX:
CoreControl: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1652136
I want to give this a go and I feel this a relevant topic to be stickied maybe under a different Topic Title ie. Custom CPU settings
Will install CoreControl and revert...
BTW: what settings have you tried using with SetCPU to underclock that doesnt result in a random reboot and that works, also what version of setCpu are you using
system tuner will allow to set the clocks for T3 properly
CoreControl is for enable/disable cores, not for overclock/underclock, I've been using it for a while, at least my HOX doesn't heat up much
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Man it would be nice top have core control on the thrill
Sent from my LG-P920 using XDA
CoreControl Feedback
vegasphinx said:
CoreControl is for enable/disable cores, not for overclock/underclock, I've been using it for a while, at least my HOX doesn't heat up much
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can now concur with @vegasphinx it doesn't heat up as much and I dont notice the difference besides the toastie popping up every so often saying CoreControl has been granted SU
can any of you give me an idea how to setup the Battery Stats within CoreControl
It crashes because there's no kernal that supports overclock/underclock.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Related
NOTE: Title should say Sonic 4 Episode 2 THD!
Bring on the fun!
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sega.sonic4ep2thd&feature=search_result#?t=W251bGwsMSwxLDEsImNvbS5zZWdhLnNvbmljNGVwMnRoZCJd
There's a LITE version too!
I feel some lag. not enough 60fps , it about 25~30 i think.
Some lag, yes. Also the virtual joystick is to small for me, so I struggle with the movement.
Seems like they rushed the release of THD version, it really needs some optimization.
The joystick is balls, it's laggy as sin!
I can barely move!
Try enabling GPU rendering in developer options, it seems to work a lot better for me. Not sure if its just a placebo effect yet though lol.
Cant Find any lite version mate
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
Rolando88 said:
Cant Find any lite version mate
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are u using a Sensation to search the game? If that's the case it won't work it's Tegra 3 only for now.
Sent from my Quad Core Monster the HTC One X using Tapatalk v 2
Should I get episode 1 first?
Is it needed, or recommended?
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk 2
use tegrastats and you will see its not requesting full performance mode
when you play S4E2 you will see the game is running between 640mhz and 1000mhz most of the time with only two cores!
run glowball and it immediately ask full performance quad mode @ 1200mhz
using setcpu and changing governors is no good since its unpredictable, performance gov never uses over 2 cores and interactive well its mostly using three cores
the best trick to play S4E2 for root users and counter the lag, use system tuner instead of SetCPU
leave it OnDemand and set the minmum to 1200mhz and max 1500mhz, if you want less heat 1200mhz min and max 1200mhz
this will force it to never drop clocks and hence never stutter, it will run mostly on three cores and sometimes asks for the 4th core
ofcourse remember to set back the minimum speed when you are done
Hi there, thinking about getting SetCPU - I have some questions before I do because I hear it can be dangerous?
- I've heard it can brick your phone?
- What if you set it too high?
- Do you personally have to monitor it?
- What are the benefits?
- Use alot of battery?
- Is it really worth using?
- Is it optimized for different phones - example the One X?
Thanks guys!
JDBurnie said:
Hi there, thinking about getting SetCPU - I have some questions before I do because I hear it can be dangerous?
- I've heard it can brick your phone?
- What if you set it too high?
- Do you personally have to monitor it?
- What are the benefits?
- Use alot of battery?
- Is it really worth using?
- Is it optimized for different phones - example the One X?
Thanks guys!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, i have read that SetCPU cannot view all the cores i have read alot saying that System Tuner works fine you might want to try that.
I used to use SetCPU on my sensation and never hand any issues with it i did not monitor the app at all
Benefits allows overclocking if available in kernel
it can be overclocked and cause some issues such as overheating but if set correctly will be fine doesnt use much battery if any
and no i dont think you can brick your phone
if you set it too high i believe i had to reflash rom nothing major
BTW this is based on my own knowledge and usage
Hope this helps
Thanks man
JDBurnie said:
Thanks man
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How much battery life can you save using setCPU?
lamenramen said:
How much battery life can you save using setCPU?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None in theory, if the CPU is slower it takes longer to go from
idle - process - idle
Faster speeds allow it to get it over and done with faster and get back to idle.
Of course it will at times stop the CPU going higher than it needs too which could save battery.
Under volting will save more batter then underclocking ever will.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
SetCPU can not see Tegra 3 yet
Use System Tuner and its free
hamdir said:
SetCPU can not see Tegra 3 yet
Use System Tuner and its free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I have system tuner, but what do I need to do in order to improve battery life?
I have set the governor to powersave. Is there anything else? How would I undervolt using this app?
lamenramen said:
Thanks. I have system tuner, but what do I need to do in order to improve battery life?
I have set the governor to powersave. Is there anything else? How would I undervolt using this app?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
undervolting requires your phones kernel to support it, currently on these forums there is only one that does but i haven't tested it, sticking firm to the "stock kernel is best" and will do untill the kernels have more time to mature.
you could limit your max speed to 1 GHz, if you are rooted you can use Core control to turn off cores and run your phone as a dual core.
treebill said:
undervolting requires your phones kernel to support it, currently on these forums there is only one that does but i haven't tested it, sticking firm to the "stock kernel is best" and will do untill the kernels have more time to mature.
you could limit your max speed to 1 GHz, if you are rooted you can use Core control to turn off cores and run your phone as a dual core.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to be lazy, but would running the phone as dual core and limiting it to 1 ghz result in a perceptible battery savings? I'm trying to get a feel for how much I should expect custom ROMs to make my One X perform up to par. Thus far, I've installed two custom ROMs and felt like the improvements were all safely in the minor category.
I did install cyanogenmod 7 on a phone last year wow, that resulted in major benefits.
lamenramen said:
Not to be lazy, but would running the phone as dual core and limiting it to 1 ghz result in a perceptible battery savings? I'm trying to get a feel for how much I should expect custom ROMs to make my One X perform up to par. Thus far, I've installed two custom ROMs and felt like the improvements were all safely in the minor category.
I did install cyanogenmod 7 on a phone last year wow, that resulted in major benefits.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Running on 2 cores stops the phone from using and 2 cores uses less power then 4, playing games and using all cores is over kill 2 cores will run the game without lag use less power and make less heat.
You'll maybe get 10% from doing that but I haven't tested.
Really the only time any of this saves battery is during demanding programs, tegrea has a super low power companion core, for all your power saving needs.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
I tried conservative governor while downloading sd files for Nova3 gave execllent results
I strongly advice not to undervolt tegra3
t3 is not like any other chip and UV or OC should not be attempted
OC because the chip is already at the max of its thermals
UV for the same reason n might end up with problems like flicker
changing governors and UC should be enough
anyone got this overclocked
mox123 said:
anyone got this overclocked
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And instantly overheated? :cyclops:
Yes .
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Gpu overclock would be more useful than CPU.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
treebill said:
Gpu overclock would be more useful than CPU.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok gpu overclock then?
I would overclock my HOX...in a block of ice. Or...well, in real life i dont want to overclock it because it would smoke out in my hand
Overheating is a big problem even without overclocking, imagine it running on 1,6ghz...
Sent from my Renovated HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Can't really see why you would want to overclock the One X, the phone is blazing fast anyway, 4 cores at 1.5 is enough..
But like everybody else said, the phone would probably burn up..
I wouldnt overclock my device - at least not at the stage we reached now.
Why?
a) As long as there is no way to lower the voltage this might toast your device - its a unibody, keep that in mind!
b) 100 MHZ more would have literally no effect - its a 6 GHZ device, even if you boost it up to 6,4 - you wont notice, it will just drain your battery.
6 GHZ is WAY enough...this is smartphone...I mean...seriously...its got more power than my 4 years old 1K €uro notebook...
Illux said:
I wouldnt overclock my device - at least not at the stage we reached now.
Why?
a) As long as there is no way to lower the voltage this might toast your device - its a unibody, keep that in mind!
b) 100 MHZ more would have literally no effect - its a 6 GHZ device, even if you boost it up to 6,4 - you wont notice, it will just drain your battery.
6 GHZ is WAY enough...this is smartphone...I mean...seriously...its got more power than my 4 years old 1K €uro notebook...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well first of all you can't just multiply the frequency by the number of cores. I'd much prefer an actual 6Ghz single core processor over 4x1.5Ghz because it won't have any compatibility and efficiency issues. Assuming they are of the same architecture and power usage of course.
Also the ARM low power SOCs probably don't have comparable number of commands per clock cycle as an x86 high performance CPU, even if it's 4 years old.
jacobgong said:
well first of all you can't just multiply the frequency by the number of cores. I'd much prefer an actual 6Ghz single core processor over 4x1.5Ghz because it won't have any compatibility and efficiency issues. Assuming they are of the same architecture and power usage of course.
Also the ARM low power SOCs probably don't have comparable number of commands per clock cycle as an x86 high performance CPU, even if it's 4 years old.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i agree.. when the multi-core CPUs first came out intel said doubling the core number would give as 47% boost in total performance (not x2 like apple says as they do not know it) lets assume that to be %50 to make the math a little bit easier..
so basically we can make the math here as; 4 cores at 1.2Ghz (when the all 4 active the clock is 1.2Ghz) gives us 1.2 x 3/2 x 3/2= 2.7 Ghz single core performance.. this value for SGS3 is; 1.4 x 3/2 x 3/2= 3.15Ghz
and here we can say dual core at (X) Ghz gives us (X) x 3/2=2.7 thus the (X) = 1.8 Ghz.. so, if you overclock any arm9 based Dual CPU to 1.8 Ghz you get the same performance "on paper".. if you want to catch up with SGS3 we need to OC it to 2.1 Ghz which is impossible at the moment i guess..
what makes the difference here is the lower loads or multiple loads on the CPU.. corecontrol users probably would have noticed; sometimes when the all 4 core are active the clock is only 480 or 640 Mhz (even 320 sometimes if i remember correctly) .. the same amount of load could be taken care of by a dual core at about 720 or 960Mhz.. but here the quad core system stays cooler with a little less energy consumed (or wasted) (as long as all the cores are in one uni-body structure, putting 2 or 4 single cores phsically together is not the case for our smartphones) this is how apple made sure about the smoothness of the ipad 2, new ipad and the iphone 4s.. they used lower clocked 2 power vr 543 GPUs.. when the load is little they can clock down to very low speeds and share the load..
and also you can always find an emtpy core waiting for new task when the others are busy..
so, long story for short; if we were dealing with a little amount but hard processes, having a single core at 2.7Ghz would be good since the quad core design would not cut one task into 4 pieces... as long as we were not thinking about the battery life and the heat.. but since we are dealing with lots of tasks which all could be handled by 1.2Ghz power having 4 cores is better for battery saving and having an empty core for a new task to run parallel with the other running tasks in the background..
It is OC out of the box I think Nvidia OC them for us and it's already pushing itself at the very edge of what is possible for it to do based on temperature, I seem to remember Hamdir saying something along those lines once upon a time...
Why bother to OC it's fast enough as it is.
---EDIT---
hamdir said:
only faux kernel betas allow OC
big warning OC is bad for the HOX given the thermal envelope
you are risking both you battery and processor if you OC
i know you are used to OC from other devices but those had headroom, it is not the case this time, T3 is operating at its max thermal capabilities on the HOX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hamdir said:
the snapdragon 2 on the Arc had a lot of headroom
the chipset is rated @ 1.5ghz stable!
not the case with T3 its milking the very maximum of the 40nm process
in other words Nvidia is OCing its T3 out of box because their chips are designed to survive massive amount of heat (sadly it doesnt mean the battery or other components would survive)
it is already Overclocked lol
sometimes you have to listen to the "science" of it and surrender
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can someone tell me where I can find over-clock able kernel for my international One X? And what is the biggest clock speed on ONE X?
At present faux kernel can oc depending on what variant CPU you have but max at 1.6ghz
I have a v2 and can do 1.55 quad fine
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
Eternity Project has an OC version up to 1.7GHz single core and 1.6GHz quad core
ZeroInfinity said:
Eternity Project has an OC version up to 1.7GHz single core and 1.6GHz quad core
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you post link?
stefan063 said:
Can you post link?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1640532
Be careful of OC, always remember, not all chips are made equal
About last Repacked Eternity Project for ARHD 9.x.x
Hello,
I try the Last repacked eternity project kernel for ARHD 9.x.x the Kernel: 3.4 v0.38 (Overclocked) at :
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1654982
But the module file was repacked for CMW ROM.
Who find good repacked module corresponding to this kernel ?
Thank you for jour help.
Underclock
As this thread is about setting CPU speeds, can somebody help me with my problem as no one is responding?
Its about underclocking..
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1868011
Thanks in advance!
how does the OC work? i mean then running all our core it is limited to 1.2 ghz and is 1.5 on a single core.
does that men all cores run at the OC value or just the single core?
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda app-developers app
I suggest you flash faux's kernel.
It can oc to 1.6GHZ for most user~
and it support s2W!
I expect many users will be aware of this information, but just in case you aren't.
Anyone overclocking should be aware that this will usually lead to higher power consumption which leads to more heat produced and lower battery life.
Especially if it is necessary to overvolt to acheive higher clock frequencies with stability.
Power consumption is proportional to Voltage squared, so small increases in core coltage can result in larger increases in power consumption than mught be thought.
Needless to say this can have negative impacts on battery discharge time and overall life (due to higher temperatures).
Plus there may be some throttling back of frequency if high temperatures are reached. Also possible that frequency may be reduced to 1Ghz maximum when battery voltage is low (i.e when discharged)
Hope this is helpful (first post here)
paul_59 said:
I expect many users will be aware of this information, but just in case you aren't.
Anyone overclocking should be aware that this will usually lead to higher power consumption which leads to more heat produced and lower battery life.
Especially if it is necessary to overvolt to acheive higher clock frequencies with stability.
Power consumption is proportional to Voltage squared, so small increases in core coltage can result in larger increases in power consumption than mught be thought.
Needless to say this can have negative impacts on battery discharge time and overall life (due to higher temperatures).
Plus there may be some throttling back of frequency if high temperatures are reached. Also possible that frequency may be reduced to 1Ghz maximum when battery voltage is low (i.e when discharged)
Hope this is helpful (first post here)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CPU throttle starts at 85c with thermal TJ-max of 99c.
also there is many debates about this, higher speed need more power which drains battery, but that said it means work gets faster meaning it can idle faster saving power, same the other side slower speeds save power but take longer to get work done using more power.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda app-developers app
stefan063 said:
Can someone tell me where I can find over-clock able kernel for my international One X? And what is the biggest clock speed on ONE X?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go to Faux123 and read the opening post
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1647993
it will teach you about Tegra 3 variants.
Flash Faux123 latest kernel to know what variant you have.
You can have 1.5ghz quadcore minimum, except if you have the poor variant0 of the Tegra 3, and 1.6ghz quadcore max if you have variant 3
So the overclocking you can achieve depends on your Tegra 3 variant, whatever the kernel, don't trust the figures in kernel threads titles, they just give the max if you have variant 3. And the majority of people have variant 1 so limited to 1.5ghz quadcore and there's nothing to do about it, no future kernel can change the way your CPU was manufactured.
Just, SetCPU can display 1.6ghz or more, but if you have variant 0 or 1 it will never use it (CPUspy will say 1550 and 1600 are unused frequencies)
Variant 1 can go upt to 1550mhz but not for quadcore, so who cares....! Same for kernels claiming up to 1.7ghz, it's in single/dual core, so once more, who cares?
What is important is what max speed you can achieve in quadcore, nothing else, and the limits are clearly defined by your Tegra3 variant
"all chips are not created equal" was a silly bull**** invented more than one year ago as an easy answer to noobs claiming they couldn't overclock their dual core at their max. Now, on the One-X and because of Nvidia unstable quality"all chips are not created equal" is sadly the truth.
PS: wrong=> to say that overclocking means more voltage, undervolting a custom kernel a little can surprisingly reduce heat when you push your CPU to its max,I can have both 1500mhz quadcore and less voltage than stock, as well as less heat (I was surprised, really, on the Sensation I had always found undervolting kinda useless)
PPS: true=> thermal throttle will always come pretty soon and reduce your max speed......
i900frenchaddict said:
Go to Faux123 and read the opening post
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1647993
it will teach you about Tegra 3 variants.
Flash Faux123 latest kernel to know what variant you have.
You can have 1.5ghz quadcore minimum, except if you have the poor variant0 of the Tegra 3, and 1.6ghz quadcore max if you have variant 3
So the overclocking you can achieve depends on your Tegra 3 variant, whatever the kernel, don't trust the figures in kernel threads titles, they just give the max if you have variant 3. And the majority of people have variant 1 so limited to 1.5ghz quadcore and there's nothing to do about it, no future kernel can change the way your CPU was manufactured.
Just, SetCPU can display 1.6ghz or more, but if you have variant 0 or 1 it will never use it (CPUspy will say 1550 and 1600 are unused frequencies)
Variant 1 can go upt to 1550mhz but not for quadcore, so who cares....! Same for kernels claiming up to 1.7ghz, it's in single/dual core, so once more, who cares?
What is important is what max speed you can achieve in quadcore, nothing else, and the limits are clearly defined by your Tegra3 variant
"all chips are not created equal" was a silly bull**** invented more than one year ago as an easy answer to noobs claiming they couldn't overclock their dual core at their max. Now, on the One-X and because of Nvidia unstable quality"all chips are not created equal" is sadly the truth.
PS: wrong=> to say that overclocking means more voltage, undervolting a custom kernel a little can surprisingly reduce heat when you push your CPU to its max,I can have both 1500mhz quadcore and less voltage than stock, as well as less heat (I was surprised, really, on the Sensation I had always found undervolting kinda useless)
PPS: true=> thermal throttle will always come pretty soon and reduce your max speed......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice words and I just won't to add variant 1 can now go to 1.55ghz with faux 07vf I'm currently usein with the lowest most stable undervolt values and less heat than stock kernel and gameplay is amazing also on arhd 9.4
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
treebill said:
CPU throttle starts at 85c with thermal TJ-max of 99c.
also there is many debates about this, higher speed need more power which drains battery, but that said it means work gets faster meaning it can idle faster saving power, same the other side slower speeds save power but take longer to get work done using more power.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your argument makes sense, but unless the governor is very efficient at controlling the CPU speed very quickly, in most cases your argument doesn’t hold true. For example when playing a game or running a CPU intensive application (where overclocking has any use) the processor works at full speed for the duration of the application.
EDIT: Frankly I don’t see any point in overclocking a phone like One X. I don’t play many games, but the few games I have played ran very smoothly. And if people are overclocking because of the (barely noticeable) laggy UI then overclocking is not a real fix anyway. Installing a custom ROM (perhaps JB), a different launcher, tweaking background apps/services are some of the more sensible and effective things to do instead.
No disrespect to the devs who are working on overclocking, but IMO HTC and nVidia must have spent a considerable amount of time and effort designing the CPU and deciding the optimal operational parameters to maximize performance while minimizing battery drain. Therefore anything out of those parameters (in theory at least) should impact either stability, or battery life. Perhaps the values HTC has decided are not the maximum possible values , because I assume they would have designed the phone to handle few exceptional conditions (i.e: extremely hot weathers). But I think over clocking would probably cause more problems in the long run than whatever the little gains you experience in short term. Just my 2c.
joewong1991 said:
Nice words and I just won't to add variant 1 can now go to 1.55ghz with faux 07vf I'm currently usein with the lowest most stable undervolt values and less heat than stock kernel and gameplay is amazing also on arhd 9.4
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Late reply, I hope you'll read it anyway
I tried faux 007b5, so overclock free too, I had 1.55ghz indeed, but never for quadcore, just for single or dual. Sadly I wasn't able to reach 1.5ghz quadcore but 1.4
With 007u, I have 1.5ghz quadcore, but 1.55 is an unused frequency
Can you check, with tegrastats, if you reach 1.55ghz quadcore or only for 1,2 (or3??) cores?
i900frenchaddict said:
Late reply, I hope you'll read it anyway
I tried faux 007b5, so overclock free too, I had 1.55ghz indeed, but never for quadcore, just for single or dual. Sadly I wasn't able to reach 1.5ghz quadcore but 1.4
With 007u, I have 1.5ghz quadcore, but 1.55 is an unused frequency
Can you check, with tegrastats, if you reach 1.55ghz quadcore or only for 1,2 (or3??) cores?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried tegrastats and I got 1.55 4 cores for about 20 sec and then 2 shut of and then ran 2 at 1150 playin dead trigger and on cod zombies 2 cores at 1350 witch I find strange faux 0105b
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Well the title says it all ,my phone randomly restarts while i am using it since started using arhd so is there any solutions?
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Are you overclocking or undervolting?
Michealtbh said:
Are you overclocking or undervolting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think what i am doing is called underclocking , i am just making max clock speed 1 ghz
that sudden rebooting means you're doing something that crashes your phone... probably the underclocking that causes this.
bit weird though as the hox has many speeds at which it can run, 1ghz being one off them.
Are you sure you didn't also undervolt your hox and that you're using an app that is 100 percent compatible?
Try running the hox at standard speeds to make sure it's not a hardware problem and using an other app to make sure it's not the app causing problems.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
I am using set cpu ,but i tried to uninstall it and so far so good but whats awkward is i always use set cpu and this problm never happened .. and about the undervolting i dont even know how to do it.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
strange, but as your not experiencing any problems after uninstalling set CPU it probably has something to do with it... maybe it's a wrong setting / are you sure set CPU is compatible with hox?
Try contacting the programmer of set CPU about this, or try another tool.
undervolting means setting a lower voltage than standard for your hardware, in this case the CPU.
This makes it spend less energy and thus generate less heat. Undervolting can be used as a battery saver (use less energy) just as underclocking.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
TheJoker79 said:
strange, but as your not experiencing any problems after uninstalling set CPU it probably has something to do with it... maybe it's a wrong setting / are you sure set CPU is compatible with hox?
Try contacting the programmer of set CPU about this, or try another tool.
undervolting means setting a lower voltage than standard for your hardware, in this case the CPU.
This makes it spend less energy and thus generate less heat. Undervolting can be used as a battery saver (use less energy) just as underclocking.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Set CPU doesn't support the hox, system tuner does however.
@vorticalbox tweet me