Related
I sent in my phone under warranty because it won't boot or even turn on. It was covered under warranty but because I have a I had a scratch on my screen they would not repair it unless the scratch was fixed. This was not covered under warranty. So in order to get my phone back I had to pay £120 to fix something I didn't want to get fixed in order for them to fix the original fault.
Just if your wondering my phone just died suddenly, I had the sat nav turned on, looked up and the phone was dead. Couldn't turn it on, wouldn't even charge . I was gutted to say the least. And now I have to pay £120 to get it fixed I am absolutely sickened. I won't be buying another HTC after this.
Anyone have any experiences with HTC returns?
Anyone know who I could complain to, because I feel abit hard done by.
That sounds absolutely unacceptable. There's no way they can force you to have a repair you don't want or need.
Make sure to speak to as many people as possible, taking their names each time so you know this is not one customer service agent getting their wires crossed. Try to speak to someone as high up as possible asking each time to be put through to whoever supervises the one you're talking to.
Sounds borderline illegal!
It's like being forced to pay for life support system when you are nearly dead from an incurable illness, and not having the option to terminate your own life. Maybe you should ask them what they would do in the above scenario.
I asked them a few times that I was ok with the scratch but If I didn't get the scratch repaired they wouldn't fix the phone at all.
I would have held out a bit longer on paying but I'm heading off on holiday soon and I want my phone back before then.
Not sure what I can do now though
bacchus_ben said:
I asked them a few times that I was ok with the scratch but If I didn't get the scratch repaired they wouldn't fix the phone at all.
I would have held out a bit longer on paying but I'm heading off on holiday soon and I want my phone back before then.
Not sure what I can do now though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very strange
but i guess it could be part of some type of quality control
i.e send in a faulty phone they have to fix everything
I know when i had a problem with my HP laptop It was sent in due to a problem with the motherboard but they ended up replacing the mobo, dvd rom and some other stuff.
I.e for them to fix the device they then need to do extra testing - but if the screen is broke or scratched it may mean testing would fail.... (just my take on it)
eeither way u shouldnt be forced into paying for a repair though - check terms again and then speak to trading standards u may have a claim u could make against them.
bacchus_ben said:
I asked them a few times that I was ok with the scratch but If I didn't get the scratch repaired they wouldn't fix the phone at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then this is obviously a policy. It should also be one YOU are fully aware of. Ask them to point you to the passage in the warranty documentation you received in the box where this policy is spelled out. If they can't tell them you'll be contacting trading standards. I'd buy myself a cheap £10 pay as you go mobile and use that for now and don't pay them off. You;d be better off not using your data on holiday anyway. Took my phone with me to Paris. Checked email once and used Maps to find my way once and it cost me a bomb
Think they are out of order they cant force u to fix ur screen unless it was completely trashed speak to trading standards asap
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
Aitese said:
Then this is obviously a policy. It should also be one YOU are fully aware of. Ask them to point you to the passage in the warranty documentation you received in the box where this policy is spelled out. If they can't tell them you'll be contacting trading standards. I'd buy myself a cheap £10 pay as you go mobile and use that for now and don't pay them off. You;d be better off not using your data on holiday anyway. Took my phone with me to Paris. Checked email once and used Maps to find my way once and it cost me a bomb
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've got navigon, co pilot and spotify all three don't need data. So I really want it for my road trip in europe. Thats why I paid but I know it does not leave me in a good bargaining position.
So I was thinking of waiting until I have my phone back before I start threatening HTC with trading standards.
What else could I do?
Try to speak to someone higher up in HTC customer service.
Sounds like extortion to me.
You mention Trading Standards, so I'm guessing you're in the UK.
First, things first, if you didn't buy direct from HTC (Can you even do tihs?) then you MUST deal with the vendor and they MUST (Absolutely, definitely, 100%) sort it out. You purchased it from someone, and the manufacturer is absolutely immaterial.
If you've paid already, you might be a bit screwed, because you probably shouldn't have dealt with HTC directly. If that's the case, then yeah, speak to Trading Standards next. Know your rights, and kick off. E-mail the CEO (Trust me, this helps get things moving) and threaten to take them to small claims. More to the point, mean it - give them time scales to respond and timescales to deal with you. Then, pay your £30 and have your day in court.
I can almost guarantee they won't bother with the hassle over £120 (Small to them, big to us) and you'll get "We'll pay, but we don't accept fault" type letter and a cheque.
Play the game! Companies try to screw us at every step of the way and they need to be told. The law is almost certainly on your side.
hermand said:
You mention Trading Standards, so I'm guessing you're in the UK.
First, things first, if you didn't buy direct from HTC (Can you even do tihs?) then you MUST deal with the vendor and they MUST (Absolutely, definitely, 100%) sort it out. You purchased it from someone, and the manufacturer is absolutely immaterial.
If you've paid already, you might be a bit screwed, because you probably shouldn't have dealt with HTC directly. If that's the case, then yeah, speak to Trading Standards next. Know your rights, and kick off. E-mail the CEO (Trust me, this helps get things moving) and threaten to take them to small claims. More to the point, mean it - give them time scales to respond and timescales to deal with you. Then, pay your £30 and have your day in court.
I can almost guarantee they won't bother with the hassle over £120 (Small to them, big to us) and you'll get "We'll pay, but we don't accept fault" type letter and a cheque.
Play the game! Companies try to screw us at every step of the way and they need to be told. The law is almost certainly on your side.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok I'm based in Ireland but I bought the phone from Clove.
I contacted them first but they said it would be quicker to deal with HTC directly as all they do is send it to them anyway. Either way I would have to send my phone to the UK. I've done returns with Sandisk and Lenovo before and had no issues.
I bet the reason they wanted you to get the screen repaired is because they will then send you a re-conditioned phone. Check those numbers!
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
My Tilt2 has developed a problem with the mic, very scratchy sounds, muffled sounding, pretty much useless as a phone without Bluetooth. Been paying the insurance on it since I got it more than a year ago.
According to at&t I'll be eligible for upgrades in Oct, but I'm wondering what a claim on the insurance would get me for the $50 deductible right now. Are they replacing Tilt2s with something else these days? Is it a choice or do they just pick something? I'd be happy with something in an Android phone maybe but I saw one thread here where someone said they got an HTC Surround to replace a Tilt2. I'm mostly running Xdandroid now so a Surround does not seem like a good replacement option if they stick me without a choice.
So, has anyone recently done an insurance claim on a Tilt2 and what did it get replaced with?
No one? Does anyone know a better place to ask the question maybe? Or should I just call in to Asurion and see what they have to say about it?
Best to just call, but they do have a site to file a claim. I used it to check what asurion was shipping as a replacement. However this was over a year ago, I don't know if this is true for AT&T.
(Sprint)
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
from my experience, as I've lost phones in the past; i found it easy to call them, tell the the phone is lost, and then ask what the replacement options are.
If your not satisfied with the options, you can always opt not to use the insurance...citing the fact that the deductible ($50) is too high in your opinion, and that you will just use an old phone until you can upgrade....... OR just happen to find your lost phone...
let me know what they present as options... i have a tilt 2 that is malfunctioning too!
kinda new at this thing, so i hope i'm replying correctly...anyways.
cliffs notes: they offered LG Quantum, HTC Surround, HTC freestyle, crappy blackberry. I ended up stringing them out for a week, and then they screwed up, and to make up for their mistake, they sent me a samsung focus. If you want the whole story, read on....
I ended up having mine replaced through asurion. I called them, they offered me in order:
-LG Quantum (they claim it is the most comparable, i kinda tend to agree after all my researching)
-HTC Surround
and if i wanted something different...
htc freestyle
or an old crappy blackberry (i didn't even write down the number)
I asked about the Samsung Focus, and was told that it wasn't available anymore, and that they were replacing the Focus with the LG Quantum. To this i was sincerely disappointed, because the focus seems to be the WP7 leader...
Anyways. I told them i needed to research the phones to decide. I dragged my feet for a week and called back, and finally got through to a supervisor, who told me that the max capacity of the TILT2 was a 16 GB microSD card. I was trying to argue that the Surround and Quantum didn't offer expandable memory like my tilt 2 did. After going over everything with him, he still wouldn't allow any other options.
I called back the next day, and decided just to get the Quantum.... I went through the process, and hung up....and waited for my confirmation email....that never came! I checked again the next morning, and still nothing!!! I called back, and spoke with another C/S agent who told me that my claim had never been completed!!! I was upset, and very disappointed.... I told he all about the process, and how i had wanted a focus, but was getting stuck with this.... and she was like, hold on. Let me see if that is available.... I'll have to get approval from my supervisor. So i'm on hold for a few mins...and she says YES! So i ended up getting the focus the next day, and so far its pretty sweet. Definitely a significant learning curve with WP7!!
So bottom line, i got a focus, and i'm happy cause i didn't have to renew my contract...
Thanks very much for the info! Too bad they don't seem to have an Android phone in the mix, and I'm not really sold on WP7 yet. In a perfect world they'd let me have a nice shiny new SGII and maybe a nice pony. At least now I can research a little. Thanks again.
Last offer from asurion was either a Status, or an LG quantum. Well they offered an HTC Freestyle but that hardly counts. I ended up spending $50 for the Samsung galaxy S II on a black Friday special. I guess this means I am done with the Rhodium, and I already miss that keyboard.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
My phone is out of warranty, because I have had it for a year and a half. A couple of weeks ago, lines appeared on my screen, and I couldn't use it. I sent it into HTC support for a repair diagnosis. Comes back that I need a touch panel replacement. They want me to pay freaking 200$ to replace it. What do you guys think?
Given how hard it is to replace the display, yes. You might be able to find it for less - a quick Google search found offers from $110 to $190, so I don't believe they are cheating you at the price quoted. Yes, the quote is a little higher than average, but it's also being done by HTC, not a high-school kid who has watched a lot of Youtube videos. I would imagine they are going to use genuine components and return the phone to like-new condition as well.
The real question is whether it is worth it or not. For the price of repair, you have a substantial percentage of the cost of a new device. I love my M8, but if I was looking down the barrel of an expensive repair, I'd be saving it for a new device instead.
I agree on all points in the previous response. You can probably find a lower price at a local repair shop, but might only be saving $50 or so. And I've seen some horror stories on these forums of some shops botching such screen replacements. Its not an easy repair to perform, and also easy to damage other components in the process. Its basically a gamble what kind of results a local repair shop will give you. Do they guarantee the phone is in perfect working condition after the repair? What happens if they scratch it up, or damage something in the process?
With HTC, you have a pretty good guarantee that they will do a good job (and with genuine parts, as mentioned).
$200 is a good chunk of cash, for sure. As also stated in the previous post, it might be better spent toward an upgrade. The M8 is a great phone, for sure. But its over 2 years old, and you may be looking for an upgrade soon, anyway.
What's going to happen to the million returned Note 7's ?
Landfill or refurbish?
It would be a massive job to open up the phones and replace the battery, and probably not worthwhile for used phones.
But there will be thousands of phones in the distribution channels that have not be sold and are in factory condition. How can someone buying a new Note 7 in say a month's time be sure it hasn't been opened up, battery replaced and repackaged? I wouldn't want one for sure.
Just think - if the battery was still removable like the Note 4 the whole thing would be so much simpler. Send out new batteries, job done.
scrapped for parts?
I'd think most of it would be in near mint condition. So a little bit of cleaning up and resold as new units or refurbished. They did just start this refurbished program very recently.
Seriously? Landfill? Do people think before posting? They are replacing the battery in the units. Then selling refurbished.
Sent from my iPaq hx2110
BozQ said:
I'd think most of it would be in near mint condition. So a little bit of cleaning up and resold as new units or refurbished. They did just start this refurbished program very recently.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The same refurbished program that has them selling a refurb T-Mobile S6 edge for $499, while T-Mobile themselves are selling new ones for $499.
Good luck with that, lol.
Selling as refurbished would be fine. But selling as new would not. How would you tell the difference?
Turns into note 8
The refurbished ones would show as such when checked with the proper app.
Player04 said:
Turns into note 8
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Note 8 sounds right for us, maybe not for them.
Fix battery problem, fix GG5 problem = the premium phone it is supposed to be.
I would think they'd examine their batteries to get a full picture of the problem for their own records. Probably they'll exchange the batteries and use them as refurbs after this.
Sent from my SM-N930F using Tapatalk
Depends who sold your phone to you.
I expect Carphone Warehouse will require customers to take their faulty phones to the heart of Mordor and there cast them down in to the fires of Mount Doom, before they'll consider providing a replacement.
And even then it'll be four weeks late.
if they send me a refurb after 3 days use before the recall was announced i'd expect a hefty refund for receipt of a second hand phone! h
I would assume they would come up with a way to read the serial and maker of the battery pack without opening up the phone, then replace only the needed ones.
I'm thinking if they had lot control of the batteries and which phones they were installed in or thought they could be identified via any means they would have done so already and then issued a recall for affected units rather than a global recall. At a guess I would venture that trying to figure out if they could do exactly that accounts for the delay between the global recall and the time it was first determined that batteries were going boom. And yes, they will become refurbs. I hadn't thought of the fact that they could be sent out as replacement units...
I'm wondering what happens to the phones you buy and then return them just cause you didn't like them, what do they do with them? Not just Note, but every phone. Do they resell them?
Travis Bickle said:
I'm wondering what happens to the phones you buy and then return them just cause you didn't like them, what do they do with them? Not just Note, but every phone. Do they resell them?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
most suppliers run their own refurb programs, so they will likely polish them up and sell them on as nearly new. (like when you buy a display model out of a shop)
as for the recalled units, chances are they will use them for parts or refurbish the phones and then use them for warranty claims and such also probably sell some on at a slight discount as certified refurbished phones.
there is just too much cost in the couple of million devices for them just to scrap them, probably way more than it will cost to debond the back replace the battery and rebond the back.
They go to heaven.
locate the faulty , remove
test and check all used recalled one then might just return back to original owner after fixing any issues such as a scratched glass
looking at other issues threads
there is a batch or bad battery
and another batch of a less bad battery since lots have reported lagging and reeboots
thoses will be replaced too
but total healthy units might just come back to you as the fixing process is taking place in each country locally
but yet each country has its trading law , so they work accordingly
thats just my guess coming out from my own overthinkful head ?
Easily refurbished and make money off of them. Samsung hasn't had profits in a bit since the s7 s7edge and the note 7 was doing well, it's a hickup but they are doing the right thing. I read a story from 2009 where a teen girl in uk had a iPhone explode and glass in her eye, Apple said not our fault. Since then tons of cases Apple does nothing. They lawyer up and keep profits.
Sent from my SM-N930V using XDA Free mobile app
I think Isis are going to buy them all
Sent from my SM-N910C using XDA-Developers mobile app
Have the Pixel 6 Pro here, noticed that when I open the camera sometimes it will just freeze up and reboot. Does this about 10 times a day. I tried reflashing the FULL OTA and Factory Images to no avail thinking it was software.
So after two hours last night of waiting to talk to customer service I tell them my issue and without hesitation she said "We will send you a new replacement phone." But it's gone be a minute and I said that's fine. I then ...and message her and go "Is it a refurbished phone a new one." She tells me they do not GIVE you a NEW phone even if it is DEFECTIVE they send you a REFURBISHED.
I told her absolutely NO thanks, in the kindest way possible, and asked if cancellation was an option, I explained I did NOT spend $1100 for a refurbished phone. Absolutely no way. She then goes on to tell me that she understands AND AGREES and that she will ask and get back to me in a few days if they can send me a NEW new one. I said if she has to jump through hoops it legit is olay to cancel it. I refuse to spend that much and have a frankenphone. You dig?
Buttt anywhooo, Just lettin y'all know...if your phone is bork, they gone sendja a refurb. You need to ASK for a new. Unless it's past the first 15 days or whatnot then you HAVE to get a refurb. But I can't live with that fact.
I would feel the same way. If using a credit card to buy a phone, some credit cards have rules which would give you options to get your money back as well, if it gets past the 15 days.
I'm really not surprised that they would do this, however. Just sucks every company would do the same thing.
roirraW edor ehT said:
I would feel the same way. If using a credit card to buy a phone, some credit cards have rules which would give you options to get your money back as well, if it gets past the 15 days.
I'm really not surprised that they would do this, however. Just sucks every company would do the same thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not mad? It's just kinda like really? I had two phones in the past that I bought new from Motorola and Oneplus that sent me brand new replacements. And my oneplus I owned for two MONTHS. I have had my 6 pro for 11 days I believe? It's just kinda like WOW. Haha my girlfriend and I were like no... we're not mad, but just cancel it.
Out of curiosity, for the sake of science, do you mind posting the logcat output capturing a few of these camera freeze up and reboot occurrences? Thanks
I'm surprised they would even have any refurbs at this time. When I did multiple replacements for my 2XL in a 2-3 month period from launch I was always sent a brand new retail package. Considering the supply issue and how popular the phone is. I would imagine they probably don't have many if any refurbs in stock to send out for warranty.
Or going by factory seconds where some did not make it out due to quality assurance checks, some phones are just born "frankenphones" at the factory itself.
zetsumeikuro said:
I'm surprised they would even have any refurbs at this time. When I did multiple replacements for my 2XL in a 2-3 month period from launch I was always sent a brand new retail package. Considering the supply issue and how popular the phone is. I would imagine they probably don't have many if any refurbs in stock to send out for warranty.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could have been as simple as already returned phones (for any reason, not even necessarily anything wrong with the phone) that the package was already opened / phone already removed from the packaging, etc, and needing minimal re-certification.
I still wouldn't want such a "refurb" so soon after buying the phone new, but there are lots of reasons why they might have phones they consider refurb in stock.
roirraW edor ehT said:
Could have been as simple as already returned phones (for any reason, not even necessarily anything wrong with the phone) that the package was already opened / phone already removed from the packaging, etc, and needing minimal re-certification.
I still wouldn't want such a "refurb" so soon after buying the phone new, but there are lots of reasons why they might have phones they consider refurb in stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, they do label those as "refurbs" as well. Would make sense they'd be mailing those out as they probably have little to no stock of brand new phones. I wouldn't care too much if I got someone's return as long as there's no cosmetic issues or mechanical issues on the device.
Exactly, I am not crying about the fact they're refurbs if I had the phone for like 6 months. But I have had this for 10 days. The phone ain't even a MONTH old. That's like a huge kick in the kahoonays for that much wallet spill...
The issue is the uncertainly on the degree of cosmetic/mechanical issues, making it a strict no from me at the retail price.
Ideal solution would be a $200 rebate on a certified refurb unit or a full refund for the inconvenience, stress, mental angst
Gytole said:
Exactly, I am not crying about the fact they're refurbs if I had the phone for like 6 months. But I have had this for 10 days. The phone ain't even a MONTH old. That's like a huge kick in the kahoonays for that much wallet spill...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't accept anything but new within the first 30 days. In your case they definitely should be giving you a brand new one. You probably got a crappy rep, I would try again with another one. Easier said than done with how nonexistent support has been since launch. Within the first 14 days they're supposed to give new devices as a replacement. Good luck man!
Depending on how much I love the product, I usually try to rule out user error first because no product is bug-free or perfect, else simply I return it since it is clearly not worth my time trying to beta test their product and buy a more reputable and reliable product.
In the Android world, Samsung has excellent brand loyalty for this reason and something Google should learn from if they wish to retain their customer base and build brand loyalty.
I mean no disrespect at all to any fans of Samsung - I loved my Galaxy S3 a long time ago. But the way Samsung's software doesn't work well for my usage, and how they make some things not work as well as they do on Pixels made my wife and I return to Pixels and sell our Note 10+ after only a year and a half - and I usually keep a phone for 3 years or at least until it's no longer updated.
The Note 10+ hardware was top-notch. Couldn't stand the software, though, and my P6P is already working much better for my wife and I than the Note 10+ was.
Low inventory could result in sending refurbished one's...
Gytole said:
Have the Pixel 6 Pro here, noticed that when I open the camera sometimes it will just freeze up and reboot. Does this about 10 times a day. I tried reflashing the FULL OTA and Factory Images to no avail thinking it was software.
So after two hours last night of waiting to talk to customer service I tell them my issue and without hesitation she said "We will send you a new replacement phone." But it's gone be a minute and I said that's fine. I then ...and message her and go "Is it a refurbished phone a new one." She tells me they do not GIVE you a NEW phone even if it is DEFECTIVE they send you a REFURBISHED.
I told her absolutely NO thanks, in the kindest way possible, and asked if cancellation was an option, I explained I did NOT spend $1100 for a refurbished phone. Absolutely no way. She then goes on to tell me that she understands AND AGREES and that she will ask and get back to me in a few days if they can send me a NEW new one. I said if she has to jump through hoops it legit is olay to cancel it. I refuse to spend that much and have a frankenphone. You dig?
Buttt anywhooo, Just lettin y'all know...if your phone is bork, they gone sendja a refurb. You need to ASK for a new. Unless it's past the first 15 days or whatnot then you HAVE to get a refurb. But I can't live with that fact.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I received my P6 Pro 2 days before launch, had a couple bugs, talked with a Customer Rep and got a replacement shipped on the 29.10 - the (replacement) phone arrived in new and pristine condition; phone was brand new, the packaging was new, nothing refurbished there. Mind though, that I was (ofc) still in return window.
Maybe what you say is true after a while when there are phones that have been refurbished, but as far as I can understand, not at launch. Also, as mentioned, return window might be a deciding factor.
Glad to see great customer service on Google's part. I also like that they're opening Pixel exclusive stores.
Could you elaborate on the two bugs that made it a deal breaker for you to hold on to your very first unit?
Morgrain said:
I received my P6 Pro 2 days before launch, had a couple bugs, talked with a Customer Rep and got a replacement shipped on the 29.10 - the phone arrived in new and pristine condition; phone was brand new, the packaging was new, nothing refurbished there. Mind though, that I was (ofc) still in return window.
Maybe what you say is true after a while when there are phones that have been refurbished, but as far as I can understand, not at launch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
miravision said:
Glad to see great customer service on Google's part. I also like that they're opening Pixel exclusive stores.
Could you elaborate on the two bugs that made it a deal breaker for you to hold on to your very first unit?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had a couple minor quirks, but the dealbreakers for me were
a) random reboots (didn't bother me the first 1 1/2 days because they only happened in idle, but then the phone randomly rebooted whilst I used it to navigate, that was unacceptable)
b) heavy lens flicker, even with clean glass (random rays of light whenever in 70% of shot pictures against/ with the sun)
Since using the replacement device, I neither had random reboots nor any more heavy lens flicker. Its possible ofc that these were software and not hardware isses, but since I set up my P6 Pro replacement the same way that I set up the "original" p6 pro one (cable backup transfer from my previous phone), it's hard to find that out.
Gytole said:
Exactly, I am not crying about the fact they're refurbs if I had the phone for like 6 months. But I have had this for 10 days. The phone ain't even a MONTH old. That's like a huge kick in the kahoonays for that much wallet spill...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally understand. It reminds me of my new iphone 5. I got it through the carrier by signing up. I take it home only got the camera to not work. I go back to the shop and they tell me Apple handles repairs and replacements. I'm fuming. So I immediately take the train to go to the Apple store. They tell me no appointment? no help. So I have to go home and try the next day. I ask the guy handing me the replacement if it's a new phone. He says it is. But as I'm riding the train back home I realize that in the language I asked him I was a little ambiguous with my phrasing and to this day I still wonder if it was a new phone.
Anyhow, it cost me over 20 dollars and 4 hours of my time because I was given a lemon. Thanks for letting me vent about something that was 9 years ago...
Gytole said:
Exactly, I am not crying about the fact they're refurbs if I had the phone for like 6 months. But I have had this for 10 days. The phone ain't even a MONTH old. That's like a huge kick in the kahoonays for that much wallet spill...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally understand. It reminds me of my new iphone 5. I got it through the carrier by signing up. I take it home only got the camera to not work. I go back to the shop and they tell me Apple handles repairs and replacements. I'm fuming. So I immediately take the train to go to the Apple store. They tell me no appointment? no help. So I have to go home and try the next day. I ask the guy handing me the replacement of it's a new phone. He says it is. But as I'm riding the train back home I realize that in the language I asked him it was a little ambiguous with my phrasing.
Anyhow, it cost me over 20 dollars and 4 hours of my time because I was given a lemon. Thanks for letting me vent about something that was 9 years ago
Google has been doing this for years, this is nothing new.