Develop Bugs

CyanogenMod 9 is coming...

Like many of you, I'm sure, I jump around XDA and browse different forums for anything interesting. This particular one... put a smile on my face. Happy to start seeing some public releases on this.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1356228

This has nothing to do with our device
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

defconoi said:
This has nothing to do with our device
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow. You're a genius.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

i already have CM9 installed on my old I9000
is fun to play around with, but not ready for prime time, because a lot of the Android Market apps that i use on a daily basis are not compatible yet with ICS
so it's going to be a long painful wait before being able to enjoy ICS fully, even if it becomes available for our T989

AllGamer said:
i already have CM9 installed on my old I9000
is fun to play around with, but not ready for prime time, because a lot of the Android Market apps that i use on a daily basis are not compatible yet with ICS
so it's going to be a long painful wait before being able to enjoy ICS fully, even if it becomes available for our T989
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i agree. prolly best to just get a new ICS device if you want that. but.. it's still good to see the evolution of software.

luckyduck69 said:
i agree. prolly best to just get a new ICS device if you want that. but.. it's still good to see the evolution of software.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
eehhhhhh... what does that has to do with getting a new hardware?
the current hardware are perfectly fine, just the programmers needs to get their things together and make sure their software are ICS compatible

There's quite a few devices with cm9 alphas already. We wont be waiting to long to see it on our phone.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

Even the g2x has a alpha version of cm9 working since Thanksgiving night so I'm sure this phone will have it soon. Also this is my first Samsung smartphone I am hoping Samsung does a little better than LG when it comes to updates and support for their phone. The g2x was a nightmare thank God I had one of the few g2x's that did not have all the bugs.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

I thought it was common knowledge that CM9 was being developed. No?

This thread is a fail. What does Nexus S development have anything to do with the GS2 ICS rom? They are entirely different chipsets.

johnston9234 said:
This thread is a fail. What does Nexus S development have anything to do with the GS2 ICS rom? They are entirely different chipsets.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
slayher said on twitter that CM9 for t989 is coming along smooth thanks to the new chipset and stuff...no ETAs tho

AznDud333 said:
slayher said on twitter that CM9 for t989 is coming along smooth thanks to the new chipset and stuff...no ETAs tho
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's great news. I can't wait to play with it.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

OuncE718 said:
That's great news. I can't wait to play with it.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats what she said......
+1

AznDud333 said:
slayher said on twitter that CM9 for t989 is coming along smooth thanks to the new chipset and stuff...no ETAs tho
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here is the URL to his G+ post talking about our device with a mention of ICS
https://plus.google.com/u/0/109781780227026386444/posts/ADMfb7WbFe5
like allgamer said until apps become more compatible gingerbread is probably better for everyday use right now. I don't really see the big deal and rush in getting ICS.

jessejames111981 said:
here is the URL to his G+ post talking about our device with a mention of ICS
https://plus.google.com/u/0/109781780227026386444/posts/ADMfb7WbFe5
like allgamer said until apps become more compatible gingerbread is probably better for everyday use right now. I don't really see the big deal and rush in getting ICS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. Added to my feed for updates.

It would be cool if/when it becomes possible for our phones to multi-boot or at least a savvy developer creates a VMWare-esque app or any other way for any other way for us to use multiple ROMs simultaneously without the need to backup, wipe, flash, repeat for each different ROM we wanna try. For example, this would be useful for us to try out a ROM that's not daily driver-ready without wiping our daily driver. Just a thought...

jaekidd1012 said:
It would be cool if/when it becomes possible for our phones to multi-boot or at least a savvy developer creates a VMWare-esque app or any other way for any other way for us to use multiple ROMs simultaneously without the need to backup, wipe, flash, repeat for each different ROM we wanna try. For example, this would be useful for us to try out a ROM that's not daily driver-ready without wiping our daily driver. Just a thought...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nandroid backup...?
VMWare-esque app is not feasible with the hardware limitations.

tweak. said:
Nandroid backup...?
VMWare-esque app is not feasible with the hardware limitations.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about boot manager compatibility? I used it with my mt4g and out was awesome!
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

Let me guess - bubby is bringing it...
[cricket chirping]
Sent from my Juggernaut SGSII or Galaxy Tab 10.1 now "In Paris"

bhowanidin said:
Let me guess - bubby is bringing it...
[cricket chirping]
Sent from my Juggernaut SGSII or Galaxy Tab 10.1 now "In Paris"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lmao
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

CM9 Nightly Build

CyanogenMod 9 nightly build have started for some phones. I don't know if I am allowed to put the link but its some thing like this download cyanogenmod com/?type=nightly. I hope they add T989 sooon.

intenman1 said:
CyanogenMod 9 nightly build have started for some phones. I don't know if I am allowed to put the link but its some thing like this download cyanogenmod com/?type=nightly. I hope they add T989 sooon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is indeed good news! Here is the link to the Mirror Network, I have bookmarked it and will keep monitoring it! CM9_Mirrors-No_SGH-T989_Yet

Those look like alll devices with current stable cm7 support

so is this to say we have ics or not? because if we dont then the world knows we've been waiting on it hence thread is taking up space. not tryna be rude but really look back and see all the ics threads and you'll understand

nighthawk626 said:
so is this to say we have ics or not? because if we dont then the world knows we've been waiting on it hence thread is taking up space. not tryna be rude but really look back and see all the ics threads and you'll understand
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can assure you if this was in ice release for t989 thread it'd be a lot more poppin and surely there would be a development thread.. sorry to hurts your bubble man :-/
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

What is nighty build??
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Its a compiled build everynight
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

I am new to cyanogenmod, sorry for my ignorance. What version if any, is supported for the T989? If supported does it have wifi calling?
Thanks.

datzstr8 said:
I am new to cyanogenmod, sorry for my ignorance. What version if any, is supported for the T989? If supported does it have wifi calling?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im pretty sure that there is no CM support for the T989 as of yet

datzstr8 said:
I am new to cyanogenmod, sorry for my ignorance. What version if any, is supported for the T989? If supported does it have wifi calling?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM9 will most likely come once ICS OTA update is released for the T989.

chlehqls said:
CM9 will most likely come once ICS OTA update is released for the T989.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In most cases this is right but doesn't necessarily need to happen. Look at the g2x..... They will most likely never get ics from lg and cm arcee compiled a just about stable ics rom that is beautiful and works great. And thats with tegra being closed source to so drivers had to be a pain also. So we could see nightlys soon who knows we have no clue they could come out this week for all we know

I am sitting with a Skyrocket CM7 rom that isn't quite finished and isn't ever going to be finished just because I can't stand anything but...
CM9 will come...its only a matter of time, many talented people are working on ICS.

zander21510 said:
I am sitting with a Skyrocket CM7 rom that isn't quite finished and isn't ever going to be finished just because I can't stand anything but...
CM9 will come...its only a matter of time, many talented people are working on ICS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I doubt that CM7 will ever be released in more than alpha. The CM team decided to go straight to CM9 with this device which means they will not do CM7 and it doesnt seem like anyone outside of CM team would bother since nobody has up til now and I am pretty sure the chances of a proper CM7 build will only go down when CM9 is released. All you can do is hold tight.

Ya this was pretty cruel. Thought it was gonna say it was up and running ugh.

...............

H8
sent from my real Gs move in silence like lasagna

How many threads can we make about the same **** ?

KillaHurtz said:
How many threads can we make about the same **** ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+20
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Whats your favorite A500 rom for A100

I know there is a "ROM" forum but that seems to be more about bugs/compatibility/how to. I thought i would start this to see what ur favorite rom is and any special tweaks you find make it better for our 7inch bundle of awesome.
Sent from my A100 using xda premium

I was wondering the same thing, flexreaper seems to b working very nice for me tho
Sent from my A100 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-4

I myself have also been enjoying using flexreaper with a modified acer ring that can be found in the roms thread that I modified.

Quick question about that ring, if I want to use it, I juss have to install ur file right? I don't have to reflash do I?
Sent from my A100 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-4

I manually replaced the stock ring with the modded one not as easy to do but I haven't gotten down making flashable zips yet.

Check my sig..... That's the rom I'm on.

Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but why would you want to install an a500 ROM on an a100 device? I've seen quite a few threads on this in a few forums. Simply wondering.
[Sent from my *voided* HTC EVO 4G running CM7 using Tapatalk]

iamdestruktor said:
Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but why would you want to install an a500 ROM on an a100 device? I've seen quite a few threads on this in a few forums. Simply wondering.
[Sent from my *voided* HTC EVO 4G running CM7 using Tapatalk]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. They work
2. The a500 has more custom roms than the a100
3. This is XDA

Theonew said:
1. They work
2. The a500 has more custom roms than the a100
3. This is XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol 1 and 3 are obvious but 2 makes sense!
[Sent from my *voided* HTC EVO 4G running CM7 using Tapatalk]

I honestly can't wait till someone tries to flash a ROM from the a500 and use the kernel (boot.img) for the a100 and find their device bricked. Just wait for ROMS to be made specifically for the a100. Right now the dev forum here is a joke. And not because of the lack of ROMS but because out of the 3 custom ROM's we have 2 of them are just a500 ROM's with a replaced boot img and build prop it seems, and no credit was given to the original devs who actually did the work in the a500 forums
Sent from my EVO 3D using XDA Premium

notsointeresting said:
I honestly can't wait till someone tries to flash a ROM from the a500 and use the kernel (boot.img) for the a100 and find their device bricked. Just wait for ROMS to be made specifically for the a100. Right now the dev forum here is a joke. And not because of the lack of ROMS but because out of the 3 custom ROM's we have 2 of them are just a500 ROM's with a replaced boot img and build prop it seems, and no credit was given to the original devs who actually did the work in the a500 forums
Sent from my EVO 3D using XDA Premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with what you say about giving credit. If they use something that was developed by others they need to not only ask for permission, but also state where their "source" has come from in the OP. They should give their "Mod" a version and they should provide MD5's for the file.
This said the "Rom's" you speak of while technically not being "developed", still fall under the above rules. Whether they belong in the Development Section or the General Section I don't really know. They DO however provide a benefit in that they save the end user from taking additional steps and doing the various flashes on their own. Kind of like a one-click.
True developed ROM's will eventually come but I can't agree with your first sentence. I would NEVER wish someone to brick their Tablet.

Land Master said:
I agree with what you say about giving credit. If they use something that was developed by others they need to not only ask for permission, but also state where their "source" has come from in the OP. They should give their "Mod" a version and they should provide MD5's for the file.
This said the "Rom's" you speak of while technically not being "developed", still fall under the above rules. Whether they belong in the Development Section or the General Section I don't really know. They DO however provide a benefit in that they save the end user from taking additional steps and doing the various flashes on their own. Kind of like a one-click.
True developed ROM's will eventually come but I can't agree with your first sentence. I would NEVER wish someone to brick their Tablet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well as long as they make a nandroid backup using CWM they shouldn't ever go through a permanent brick. If they don't make that...then I don't know what to tell them. lol.

notsointeresting said:
I honestly can't wait till someone tries to flash a ROM from the a500 and use the kernel (boot.img) for the a100 and find their device bricked. Just wait for ROMS to be made specifically for the a100. Right now the dev forum here is a joke. And not because of the lack of ROMS but because out of the 3 custom ROM's we have 2 of them are just a500 ROM's with a replaced boot img and build prop it seems, and no credit was given to the original devs who actually did the work in the a500 forums
Sent from my EVO 3D using XDA Premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How come it is such a big deal to you that people are using a500 roms? I really do not know why this makes you so upset and to say you can't wait for someone to brick their device is not classy at all. I do not see anyway that could brick our device anyway. Asking people who love to tinker to be patient is very unlikely to happen. With that said, the first thing I noticed when I saw the aforementioned roms posted was there was no link to the source or credit given.

Gibson.Dubs said:
How come it is such a big deal to you that people are using a500 roms? I really do not know why this makes you so upset and to say you can't wait for someone to brick their device is not classy at all. I do not see anyway that could brick our device anyway. Asking people who love to tinker to be patient is very unlikely to happen. With that said, the first thing I noticed when I saw the aforementioned roms posted was there was no link to the source or credit given.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
anything can happen when your flashing another devices rom lol. definetly waiting for a true custom a100 rom here.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium

ptesmoke said:
anything can happen when your flashing another devices rom lol. definetly waiting for a true custom a100 rom here.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With that argument anything could happen when you flash A100 roms too. Zeronull has one already in the development section if you haven't seen that.

So wait... You can flash A500 ROMs to the A100 with a boot.img from an A100 ROM? Or am I just not getting this

MusicManNick said:
So wait... You can flash A500 ROMs to the A100 with a boot.img from an A100 ROM? Or am I just not getting this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, you can.

Theonew said:
Yes, you can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well! I'm gonna try flashing AOKP Build 30 for the A500 with boot.img from ZN Custom Firmware for the A100!

I think the only reason why we aren't bricking our tab when flashing a a500 rom with a a100 boot.img is because they share near identical cpu an gpu chipsets.

Gibson.Dubs said:
With that argument anything could happen when you flash A100 roms too. Zeronull has one already in the development section if you haven't seen that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well if it was a bad flash or a bad download yes you could softbrick.
but running another devices modules...diff story
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium

[Q] CM9 - Explain it to me like I'm an idiot.

I was at Lifehacker the other day and there was a post about someones homescreen. Turns out the person was on a Galaxy S and running CM9. That just seems wrong to me.
Cyanogenmod seems to list the Galaxy SII without distinguishing between the models. I realize that the Hercules is different from other flavors of SGII.
Is Hercules the only odd model or are other SGII users left out in the cold?
What enables someone who has an Galaxy I to run CM9 and not us?
Thanks for walking me through it.

pairustwo said:
I was at Lifehacker the other day and there was a post about someones homescreen. Turns out the person was on a Galaxy S and running CM9. That just seems wrong to me.
Cyanogenmod seems to list the Galaxy SII without distinguishing between the models. I realize that the Hercules is different from other flavors of SGII.
Is Hercules the only odd model or are other SGII users left out in the cold?
What enables someone who has an Galaxy I to run CM9 and not us?
Thanks for walking me through it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It all has to do with having proprietary drivers which for that source is needed. CM9 is based on ICS and since we don't yet have an official release of ICS for the T989 we don't have CM9
Precautionary Troll Comment: I should actually teach you how to search, this topic has been covered many times before.

iLeopard said:
It all has to do with having proprietary drivers which for that source is needed. CM9 is based on ICS and since we don't yet have an official release of ICS for the T989 we don't have CM9
Precautionary Troll Comment: I should actually teach you how to search, this topic has been covered many times before.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the search tip; I've searched for CM9 in our threads but I still don't get it. What are we and cyanogen waiting for and who is responsible for producing it?
As I'm sure you know we have a skyrocket (T989) version of ICS out there but that isn't what we need. We need... an official release? These proprietary drivers have to come from T-Mobile? Thanks for being more specific.

pairustwo said:
Thanks for the search tip; I've searched for CM9 in our threads but I still don't get it. What are we and cyanogen waiting for and who is responsible for producing it?
As I'm sure you know we have a skyrocket (T989) version of ICS out there but that isn't what we need. We need... an official release? These proprietary drivers have to come from T-Mobile? Thanks for being more specific.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
XDA devs and Cyanogen are waiting for ICS to drop. Samsung and carriers are responsible for the hold up. Samsung could release source so devs could build a proper kernel and rom but carriers are obsessed with bloating OTA's,which is why we have to wait. Skyrocket's ICS is not from source rather a leak. From my understanding, its a leak precompiled rom that can be manipulated in ways but are limited in others (the details for that I am unsure).

CM9 is a..
Ok, that's it for today, we will cover more tomorrow
Sorry couldn't resist.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Towle said:
CM9 is a..
Ok, that's it for today, we will cover more tomorrow
Sorry couldn't resist.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ha -.-
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Nightly cynogenmod + googy-max kernal

The googy-max kernel says its for cynogenmod 10.2, but do not use on the samsung galaxy s3. It hard bricked my phone. I'm not new to flashing roms and kernels, so this wasn't a mistake on my behalf.

Boobteg4642 said:
The googy-max kernel says its for cynogenmod 10.2, but do not use on the samsung galaxy s3. It hard bricked my phone. I'm not new to flashing roms and kernels, so this wasn't a mistake on my behalf.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure you didn't make a mistake? I don't doubt that you're a veteran flasher, but you definitely messed up this time. We only use d2 kernels here.

I only see it as available for the international model S3, which we already know not to flash. Lots of veterans have made the exact same mistake. Just reinforces that no matter how much you think you know, you still should always read the stickied threads. Doesn't matter how much experience you have, every device is different.
Sent from my SGH-T999L using Tapatalk 4

DocHoliday77 said:
I only see it as available for the international model S3, which we already know not to flash. Lots of veterans have made the exact same mistake. Just reinforces that no matter how much you think you know, you still should always read the stickied threads. Doesn't matter how much experience you have, every device is different.
Sent from my SGH-T999L using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, i read it was ok to use with the dtmo t-mobile version of the cynogenmod nightly, here on this site. I'll try to find the forum again and reference to it.

Please do. I've never heard of any kernel, Rom, mod, or anything from the international S3 that was ok to flash to any US model.
Sent from my SGH-T999L using Tapatalk 4

Boobteg4642 said:
No, i read it was ok to use with the dtmo t-mobile version of the cynogenmod nightly, here on this site. I'll try to find the forum again and reference to it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even if you read it in one place, that is the kind of thing you confirm before flashing. There are lots of rumors and misinformation floating around.

I can tell you that ATT and T-Mobile kernels can be cross flashed but I wouldn't know about others.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 4