i would like to start a team to port the webOS on to this phone
i would like to do this with webOS 3.0.5 and it is opensource
http://opensource.palm.com/3.0.5/index.html
i just dont have all of the knowledge to do this by myself and i would to have people help me with it.
i know android is better but every other OS get android ported to it so why not port something to an android phone???
HP is now slowly but surely making webOS opensource; when HP bought webOS from palm they made it closed source and now are slowly but surely making it open sourced. open webOS 1.0 comes out in sept. 2012. but i cant tell if it's releasing the source code to webOS 1.0 ( palm released it when they controlled i) or a new version of webOS that will be open source.
i'd love to help, but am unavailable until late may. i'll check back with you then. in the meantime good luck, i think it would be great.
i firmly believe webOS was the better mobile OS, it just had poor marketing and hence no sales; couldn't compete with apple and google.
it'd be fun to see it on the phone, if for no other reason than just to play with it for a little bit
I love webOS, in fact it was the only thing about my Pre then Pixi that I loved. lol If I had even an ounce of developing knowledge I'd be thrilled to help, as it is I'll be anxiously awaiting the results of your endeavor. Good luck!
tshile said:
i'd love to help, but am unavailable until late may. i'll check back with you then. in the meantime good luck, i think it would be great.
i firmly believe webOS was the better mobile OS, it just had poor marketing and hence no sales; couldn't compete with apple and google.
it'd be fun to see it on the phone, if for no other reason than just to play with it for a little bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that is fine, when HP bought webOS from palm they made it closed source and now are slowly but surely making it open sourced. open webOS 1.0 comes out in sept. 2012. but i cant tell if it's releasing the source code to webOS 1.0 ( palm released it when they controlled i) or a new version of webOS that will be open source.
While I doubt I would use it as a daily, I would love to see this done.
Would be a great thing to play with, and I believe that offering choices like this can only benefit our little E4GT community. The more roms, the better. (and it would look darn pretty on this screen...)
Sent from my calculator watch.
WebOS was the ****. My Pre was the bomb. Too bad it flopped ;_;
I honestly still miss my pre till this day! Too bad web os didn't survive
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
RayTrue04 said:
I honestly still miss my pre till this day! Too bad web os didn't survive
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I still have my piece of chit pre flashed web OS 2 wifi only the stupid thing is almost as good as a iPod ....oh it's better cause you don't have to use itunes
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
I would LOVE to have my old Pre to mess around with: When I upgraded to an Evo, I didn't know at the time that you got to keep your old phone: so I WAS gonna keep it, but they gave me like 36 bucks for it (come to think of it, it was borked anyway), but I do miss that little feller once in a while.
The other thing I wish I had was that charging stone thing: you can totally hack those to work with SGS2's.
yourbrotherrex said:
I would LOVE to have my old Pre to mess around with: When I upgraded to an Evo, I didn't know at the time that you got to keep your old phone: so I WAS gonna keep it, but they gave me like 36 bucks for it (come to think of it, it was borked anyway), but I do miss that little feller once in a while.
The other thing I wish I had was that charging stone thing: you can totally hack those to work with SGS2's.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One of the rumors of the sgs3 is it will have some type of inductive charging like the pre
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
yokken said:
WebOS was the ****. My Pre was the bomb. Too bad it flopped ;_;
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had the original Pre as well, still do in fact. Makes for a nice paperweight. The reason the Pre flopped was because the hardware was too weak for the OS, the phone quality was lacking big time, and the OS itself was severely unfinished at time fo release. In fact, I would consider it still in the alpha stage. Hell, some alpha builds of CyanogenMod are more capable than WebOS at it's release. I mean seriously, no video recording, no scrub bar in the music player, no APIs that allow apps to access the microphone or the camera, and bugs out the wazoo. And no voice dialing. Hell, even my old Moto Q running Windows Mobile 5 had voice dialing. Performance was sluggish at best, and boot times could be measured with an hourglass. Then the promise that every webOS device would be getting at least version 2.0, and the reneging on that promise shortly thereafter. Even overclocked at 1 Ghz, the iphone 3GS would smoke the damn thing, and it's clocked at 500 Mhz. WebOS 3.0 should have been the initial release.
However, the concept was great, and some of the features are great as well. Now that it is open source, I'm hoping that some of it's features make it into Android.
sputnik767 said:
I had the original Pre as well, still do in fact. Makes for a nice paperweight. The reason the Pre flopped was because the hardware was too weak for the OS, the phone quality was lacking big time, and the OS itself was severely unfinished at time fo release. In fact, I would consider it still in the alpha stage. Hell, some alpha builds of CyanogenMod are more capable than WebOS at it's release. I mean seriously, no video recording, no scrub bar in the music player, no APIs that allow apps to access the microphone or the camera, and bugs out the wazoo. And no voice dialing. Hell, even my old Moto Q running Windows Mobile 5 had voice dialing. Performance was sluggish at best, and boot times could be measured with an hourglass. Then the promise that every webOS device would be getting at least version 2.0, and the reneging on that promise shortly thereafter. Even overclocked at 1 Ghz, the iphone 3GS would smoke the damn thing, and it's clocked at 500 Mhz. WebOS 3.0 should have been the initial release.
However, the concept was great, and some of the features are great as well. Now that it is open source, I'm hoping that some of it's features make it into Android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will certainly be remembered as an OS that was ahead of it's time. The iPhone was originally going to be all based on web technologies but Apple released pretty dang quickly that they couldn't muster the hardware to render the graphics without breaking the bank. Eventually, the hardware and battery technology will catch up to WebOS and it will make sense -- then the community will be able to focus on adding features. HP/Palm was just too bogged down trying to make it do every day things that they never could compete on the API or feature-sets. It was a damn shame.
I'm hoping that the opensource project will gain the same legs that linux, apache, firefox, wordpress and others have enjoyed. I think that the only thing holding it back will be a "reference" hardware design but (fingers crossed) HP may just come out with one.
I would LOVE to see this happen! I miss my Pre from time to time I had the original. WebOS was such a beauty, too bad the dev support for it was lacking (on the app development side, anyway). Kudos and donations to whomever gets this going!
wotan2525 said:
It will certainly be remembered as an OS that was ahead of it's time. The iPhone was originally going to be all based on web technologies but Apple released pretty dang quickly that they couldn't muster the hardware to render the graphics without breaking the bank. Eventually, the hardware and battery technology will catch up to WebOS and it will make sense -- then the community will be able to focus on adding features. HP/Palm was just too bogged down trying to make it do every day things that they never could compete on the API or feature-sets. It was a damn shame.
I'm hoping that the opensource project will gain the same legs that linux, apache, firefox, wordpress and others have enjoyed. I think that the only thing holding it back will be a "reference" hardware design but (fingers crossed) HP may just come out with one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, definitely ahead of it's time. I wish I got my hands on a TouchPad (or 5) during the fire sale, but I had a med school exam coming up and had to miss it. It seemed pretty nice though, when I played with it. Definitely came a long way from my original Palm Pre.
This thread gave me such a feeling of nostalgia I actually found myself on ebay perusing the Palm Pre listings. lol
Overclocked to 1ghz my pre scores better in sun spider than my epic touch stock in GB. I bought a really good iTunes remote app that I still use on that thing. I sold my of epic when I upgraded, but I still have and love my pre. I am not a dev by any stretch, but when you get to testing phases, I'm a pretty good beta tester.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Esoteric68 said:
This thread gave me such a feeling of nostalgia I actually found myself on ebay perusing the Palm Pre listings. lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you really want one look in craigslist for around 50 bucks should be able to get one ....not that I think its worth that
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Related
Anyone knw when android might be ported to be used on WP7? I plan on getting a Samsung Focus instead of The Captivate so i can get the best of both world, WP7 and Android (if it happens)
Not happening anytime soon.
1. No unlock yet
2. Brand new coding that has to be deciphered
3. Most people buying this phone don't want android
Buy a bloody android phone if you want android!!!!
Good luck getting the device drivers.from MS.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
What's the point? Aren't WP7 phones and Android phones based on the same hardware ?
android on sd is never going to happen .
and nand maybe when there are phones with way better hardware ( what is the point to port android to a phone with same hardware as hd2)
personally I hope android is never coming to a wp7 phone .
Are you kidding me? if you want android go buy an android phone...... thats like, buying an iphone and hoping someone ports WP7 to it. go buy an android phone.....seriously.....
For information ...
Is in the correct section as this is a question about Android on a device WP7
ShadowLegion said:
Anyone knw when android might be ported to be used on WP7? I plan on getting a Samsung Focus instead of The Captivate so i can get the best of both world, WP7 and Android (if it happens)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see any reason for Android on a WP7 device. That would be like a downgrade.
I think it would be great for apps that have not been released. I would be lost w/o out logmein. There are prob some people out there like me that would love to run wm7 and jump to the android os form time to time to do things like that.
I've decided to abandon Android on my HD2 altogether now. There's just too many problems or bugginess with it that it just isn't as good as a nice Energy build of WinMo. All of the work they've done with Android over the months and there's still just not fit for use. Currently the best one I've found is the eVo Carbon Remix build by motoman234. But it's a Sense build and I prefer the more convenient Nexus-based builds. However, ALL of the Nexus-based builds are unusable with the number of widgets I use. And the ONLY Nexus-based build that stayed smooth scrolling with all of my widgets in place was NexusHD2. It has a touchscreen problem where the touch is intermittent.
I just can't see Android being of any use for the WP7 devices. It would never be as usable as WP7.
Quality is perception and experience, not fact.
They are not the same other than they can use the same hardware. They should not be combined. Port the program, not the os.
Sent from my DROID2 using XDA App
I work for a company developing/testing s/w for all mobile devices. I have access to all OS's and I can honestly say that IMO Windows Phone has the nicest user experience and all its lacking are features. Its only been out a week or two so give it time for the bugs to be fixed, features added and the App store to mature and it will be a cracking OS.
Done cleaning on a thread.
All provocative commentary of lqaddict and responses to it have been erased.
I'm leaving this notice as a last attempt to leave this topic open.
Offtopic's provocations or next, I'll close it.
mmelo76 said:
Done cleaning on a thread.
All provocative commentary of lqaddict and responses to it have been erased.
I'm leaving this notice as a last attempt to leave this topic open.
Offtopic's provocations or next, I'll close it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you
MartyLK said:
I've decided to abandon Android on my HD2 altogether now. There's just too many problems or bugginess with it that it just isn't as good as a nice Energy build of WinMo. All of the work they've done with Android over the months and there's still just not fit for use. Currently the best one I've found is the eVo Carbon Remix build by motoman234. But it's a Sense build and I prefer the more convenient Nexus-based builds. However, ALL of the Nexus-based builds are unusable with the number of widgets I use. And the ONLY Nexus-based build that stayed smooth scrolling with all of my widgets in place was NexusHD2. It has a touchscreen problem where the touch is intermittent.
I just can't see Android being of any use for the WP7 devices. It would never be as usable as WP7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I gave up on custom roms altogether two years ago for the same reason. WinMo or Android, there was always at least a handful of huge bugs and/or unacceptable instability and/or limitations and/or stuff that didn't work. I wouldn't say there will NEVER be some alternative OS on these phones and I certainly wouldn't be so pompous to say that there shouldn't be some alternative OS available for those who might want it, but personally, given the speed and flexibility of these devices even now and all the afforementioned problems, I don't think I could really care less. Frankly, if I wanted an Android phone I'd have gotten one but after being spoiled by the iPhone for two years and given all the problems I've had with HTC devices in the past, I have zero interest. Fortunately, everyone is different.
markgamber said:
Thank you
I gave up on custom roms altogether two years ago for the same reason. WinMo or Android, there was always at least a handful of huge bugs and/or unacceptable instability and/or limitations and/or stuff that didn't work. I wouldn't say there will NEVER be some alternative OS on these phones and I certainly wouldn't be so pompous to say that there shouldn't be some alternative OS available for those who might want it, but personally, given the speed and flexibility of these devices even now and all the afforementioned problems, I don't think I could really care less. Frankly, if I wanted an Android phone I'd have gotten one but after being spoiled by the iPhone for two years and given all the problems I've had with HTC devices in the past, I have zero interest. Fortunately, everyone is different.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The custom winmo ROMs are a different story to me. There are a lot of varieties available, and I have used a few, but by far the most reliable, stable and interesting of them are the Energy ROMs. I have zero problems using the one I use and it is fast, nimble and efficient. It doesn't require the constant maintenance the OEM ROM required in order to stay smooth and useful.
Before I flashed my first custom winmo on my HD2, I didn't believe guys sitting at their PCs doing these as a hobby could match or exceed a corporation who's workers were doing it for a living. But this one has shown me differently.
Android just doesn't interest me any longer, ever since using an actual Android phone for a few days. I just lost all drive to mess with it now that I have WP7. WP7 isn't any kind of a customizer's system but it is a system that is clean, smooth and exudes quality from every circuit. Android is like a mid-grade Ford sedan compared to WP7, which is more akin to a high-end Lexus or Infiniti.
MartyLK said:
The custom winmo ROMs are a different story to me. There are a lot of varieties available, and I have used a few, but by far the most reliable, stable and interesting of them are the Energy ROMs. I have zero problems using the one I use and it is fast, nimble and efficient. It doesn't require the constant maintenance the OEM ROM required in order to stay smooth and useful.
Before I flashed my first custom winmo on my HD2, I didn't believe guys sitting at their PCs doing these as a hobby could match or exceed a corporation who's workers were doing it for a living. But this one has shown me differently.
Android just doesn't interest me any longer, ever since using an actual Android phone for a few days. I just lost all drive to mess with it now that I have WP7. WP7 isn't any kind of a customizer's system but it is a system that is clean, smooth and exudes quality from every circuit. Android is like a mid-grade Ford sedan compared to WP7, which is more akin to a high-end Lexus or Infiniti.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
car analogies + ford using windows = lol
the lexus steers itself into a parking spot, so you don't have to think. or learn. or try new things. ;-)
anyway....
i think you would be much better off to use an android device, or iphone for taht matter when trying things with android. the wp7 devices will likely be very, very closed, very locked down, and very not fun to develop on. we're talking about developing anything other than wp7 here, so if someone flames that comment, you didn't read the entire bit.
the wp7 phone i played with @ bestbuy was very smooth (no multi-tasking) and did the very few things it did very well. only hung up when i tried to sms myself, and a reboot (i think this might be standard) fixed it quickly.
the hardware of the wp7 phones isn't going to be exactly like Android devices, and some bits will just never have drivers. unfortunately, this is a similar fate that we've been suffereing from with carriers in the US for a long time. they sell a phone, locked to their service, locked to their GSM bands, locked (no root) to their rom, and then when things go sour they expect you to just buy ANOTHER phone from them.
i'm casting a vote for open hardware, open OS's, and open information. wp7 is still very immature, and will gain some speed with enough time. hopefully some Android centric device manufacturers will release specs and drivers for anyone to play with. i'll bet it takes another 4-5 years before people realize just how much better things can be by allowing instead of limiting themselves.
give it time, you'll be able to emulate iphone hardware on the 3rd core of your wp8 device, or Android on the 2nd, all whiel playing a game AND facetime'ing your vbff.
hell, we didn't htink we'd be shooting HD video on phones not long ago ;-)
See, here's the problem; you assume we're just ignorant end users who haven't seen the light about android and open software and all that and it's an incorrect assumption. As a developer I've worked with tons of devices over the years and I know exactly what I want in a phone and Android isn't it. iPhone filled the position for a while but that's not it any longer, also. WP7 looks to be exactly what I want in a phone and it's going to get better. Oh...and I might also add that while I haven't had a lot of experience with it as a developer yet, it's been a blast to work with. Probably more so than the iPhone where I constantly had problems with certs and having to make sure I had the right version of OS, iTunes, XCode and iOS target and whatever other hoops needed to be jumped. It's as much fun as your imagination allows and my wife says I have a pretty good imagination.
markgamber said:
See, here's the problem; you assume we're just ignorant end users who haven't seen the light about android and open software and all that and it's an incorrect assumption. As a developer I've worked with tons of devices over the years and I know exactly what I want in a phone and Android isn't it. iPhone filled the position for a while but that's not it any longer, also. WP7 looks to be exactly what I want in a phone and it's going to get better. Oh...and I might also add that while I haven't had a lot of experience with it as a developer yet, it's been a blast to work with. Probably more so than the iPhone where I constantly had problems with certs and having to make sure I had the right version of OS, iTunes, XCode and iOS target and whatever other hoops needed to be jumped. It's as much fun as your imagination allows and my wife says I have a pretty good imagination.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look at WP7 market now, there is even a thread here started - it is already filled with junk.
Anyway, since you are a developer reach out to MS and suggest what you would like to see in the market, and what you would like them to offer to the users.
Happy anniversary, btw.
ohgood said:
car analogies + ford using windows = lol
the lexus steers itself into a parking spot, so you don't have to think. or learn. or try new things. ;-)
anyway....
i think you would be much better off to use an android device, or iphone for taht matter when trying things with android. the wp7 devices will likely be very, very closed, very locked down, and very not fun to develop on. we're talking about developing anything other than wp7 here, so if someone flames that comment, you didn't read the entire bit.
the wp7 phone i played with @ bestbuy was very smooth (no multi-tasking) and did the very few things it did very well. only hung up when i tried to sms myself, and a reboot (i think this might be standard) fixed it quickly.
the hardware of the wp7 phones isn't going to be exactly like Android devices, and some bits will just never have drivers. unfortunately, this is a similar fate that we've been suffereing from with carriers in the US for a long time. they sell a phone, locked to their service, locked to their GSM bands, locked (no root) to their rom, and then when things go sour they expect you to just buy ANOTHER phone from them.
i'm casting a vote for open hardware, open OS's, and open information. wp7 is still very immature, and will gain some speed with enough time. hopefully some Android centric device manufacturers will release specs and drivers for anyone to play with. i'll bet it takes another 4-5 years before people realize just how much better things can be by allowing instead of limiting themselves.
give it time, you'll be able to emulate iphone hardware on the 3rd core of your wp8 device, or Android on the 2nd, all whiel playing a game AND facetime'ing your vbff.
hell, we didn't htink we'd be shooting HD video on phones not long ago ;-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here's the thing...from my perspective...I like closed systems. Simple as that. But WP7 is a closed system with high-end quality. I love the iPhone and will grow even fonder of WP7 as it matures, providing MS stays with a closed system and maintains the emphasis on quality over quantity.
I've had my fill of Android and all it offers. I just...erm...it's...boring, to me. It gives me the feel of a used up hooker. It's been in every bed known to humanity.
Just wanted to see what type of user MS is attracting. i suspect the other colum will be quite low, which of course would not be good for microsoft.
I will follow this thread!
A poll until it interesting.
But I warn that any flame, I will not even post anything, I just delete the comment.
One suggestion:
Just vote, please!
I Have been a long time user of wm and recently palm and android, I just got to the point where I wanted a straightforward uncontested smartphone that gives me the info I need on the move, wp7 meets my needs perfectly
I would consider trying out WP7 (even with all its deficiencies) but the ones being offered by AT&T are garbage. Just look at HTC Surround. Was this phone a inside joke by HTC? Slap on a some cheap, useless and bulky speakers on a phone and see how many people would rush to buy one just because it is different. Amazing how a bunch of designers came together and agreed on this model as one of their flagships.
The one phone that does interest me is the 7 Pro. But there is no word on when it will be out on US soil, it has only 8gb internal memory, and by the time the phone does come out it will be too little too late. Looks like I will be on my Tilt 2 for a while.
I was on Symbian, then wm6.5 then Symbian then WP7 with my HD7.
Coming from my Tilt2, which I loved dearly, but spent way too much time trying to tweak. The effortless speed of WP7 is a breath of fresh air.
I voted as an average user because technically this is my first smart phone w/ any type of data plan. I spent @ 10 hours playing with phones and reading forums before picking WP7. Didn't want iOS simply becuase I didn't want what masses already have. Considered Android because of all you can do to it and enjoyned playing with my wifes Aria. However every time I went to ATT I gravitated to the WP7 devices. I really liked the fresh new UE and the HTC Surround. I just like how it felt in my hands over the Focus and personally I think the speakers are neat and rock when compaired to any other "noise" you get from any other device. 100% pleased with my choice.
Average users dont visit xda and most of the other categories listed dont like WP7.
efjay said:
Average users dont visit xda and most of the other categories listed dont like WP7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe so. But like I said this is my first smart phone and although I have been too xda before I never really read much of the content on the page or forums. What should I have selected then?
Focus is superb
deeken said:
I would consider trying out WP7 (even with all its deficiencies) but the ones being offered by AT&T are garbage.
Looks like I will be on my Tilt 2 for a while.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Focus is FAR superior to my HTC phones that I owned and loved. Didn't think I could do without a hardware keyboard, as I can't type on my wife's iPhone (after hours of trying). I still make a lot of mistakes, but, this phone corrects my typos accurately 99% of the time.
I don't miss the lag and drag of my Tilt2, which I overclocked to 748 mHz. Hopefully this phone won't fall apart like my HTCs.
I've been an Android user since the very beginning. I preordered a G1...and still own it, a MyTouch 3G, and a Vibrant. I was also impressed enough by the HD2 hardware to give WM a shot. Stock WM on the TMOUS HD2 was a mess...but that was nothing that a nice custom rom wasn't able to fix. I still enjoy using my HD2 on occasion. I also own an iTouch...which, of course, runs iOS (beautiful hardware, but mine is best at collecting dust). And, although it's a bit of an afterthought now, I also owned three Blackberries.
I really like Android. Nothing can touch it when it comes to customization. But, the inherent stuttering and occasional lag does get old...even though it's gotten much better in both departments and is now fairly smooth on most new phones. It's also not the prettiest thing in the world, in my opinion (I also think iOS is hidious looking...although nothing is smoother, but WP7 is nipping on its heels in that department).
I've owned my HD7 for nearly a week. I bought it with the full intention of returning it prior to the end of my 14 grace period...unless it totally blew my mind. Well, consider my mind blown. I now believe that it's a keeper. Keeping in mind that WP7 is currently just at v1.0, I believe that MS has done a better job than both Apple and Google. Yes, there are a few features missing....but there's good reason for that...and the upcoming update is very likely to address those deficiencies.
For v1.0, MS focused on the UI, and it shows. My HD7 is incredibly smooth and blazing fast. The UI is intuitive, efficient, beautiful, and fun. The few issues with it are also things that were lacking in both iOS and Android initially...and it took both Apple and Google substantually longer to address them than what it's taken MS. Many people are saying that these things should've been included from the get go. I say that MS has created a masterpiece, and that...as long as the missing features are addressed in a timely manner....whatever they had to do to get the rest right was ok in my book.
MS was down...and all the haters thought that they were out. I never felt that way, but I was skeptical that they were going to be able to deliver something that would truly rival the offerings from Google and Apple. I was wrong....and so were/are all the haters.
I am as unbiased as it gets. I own devices that run all 4 major mobile OS'...and know their strengths, and weaknesses, inside out. I now consider WP7 to be my favorite. MS has laid a foundation that surpasses the foundations that both Google and Apple initially laid. Things are only going to get better from here on out...and I'm excited to see how far MS can take this.
Does this refer to what platform I was JUST on before making the jump to WP7? Because I have owned iPhone, Android, AND Symbian based phones as my past Smartphones. Also, how come Symbian or BlackBerry is not included in the poll? That is a glaring omission....
Also missing is Blackberry.
I came from android but I ticked other as I think that would be the main target for MS most android users love its openness iPhone users are to loyal even though ots hardly changed and old MS users want the buseness features more than the play. As I said I came from android but I always planned to change before I bought my desire so I don't think it counts.
have been a long time htc user first the tilt then the tilt 2. loved my tilt2, got the surround and returned it due to battery life.... never thought id like a samsung device, seeing how my girlfriend went through about five instincts, and four or five various other sprint samsung phones,,, but i must say i love my Samsung Focus...........
Windows Mobile User Tried and True
Ive been a Windows Mobile User since its inception and I have to say Microsoft has out done themselves. Just need to bring on the Business access like remote desktop and ICS. Still have my HP IPaq 1945, Tilt, and Tilt 2. I know own the Samsung Focus. We also need a XDA App for Windows Mobile 7.
davidebanks said:
Just wanted to see what type of user MS is attracting. i suspect the other colum will be quite low, which of course would not be good for microsoft.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have used most of the modern smartphone OS's (see signature), just waiting for a good Android tablet now that Honeycomb is almost here ...
rexian said:
I have used most of the modern smartphone OS's (see signature), just waiting for a good Android tablet now that Honeycomb is almost here ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You haven't tried the Samsung Galaxy Tab? Outstanding smaller tablet. Has 16GB built-in and a slot for up to 32GB extra. Has front and rear cameras and can be used as a phone....with the install of a specific app.
What do I vote as? I moved from an HD2 which was running Android but I also have an iPod Touch and iPad :S
DavidC1980 said:
What do I vote as? I moved from an HD2 which was running Android but I also have an iPod Touch and iPad :S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm being only 1 of those is a phone and the topic is "Who is buying windows phone 7" key word phone. That narrows it down to which one of the 3 to consider IMO. And since your using Android on your HD2 I would think you should vote as an Android user.
iPhone 3g - 3gs - Android (Galaxy S) user here.
How do you like Wp7? I'm genuinely interested to hear.
How is it compared to ios? Android? Is it "too" simple?
Do you see it as a viable contender in the near future? (Ive been thinking about wanting to give MW7 a whirl.)
Will Wp7 be favored by the business community considering it has "word" and "office"?
How do you feel about the Nokia/MS joint venture?
Will these 2 company's together be able to make something truly great and not just be a competitor? Could they bring new innovations to the market?
Wp7 not wm7. As far as I'm concerned IOS and Android are dated by comparison and have nothing new to offer. Neither of them has had anything updated worth speaking about since 3.0 on IOS or eclair on Android. Wp7 is refreshing after seeing phone oses get sold solely by hardware or advertisements. Gingerbread was essentially a glorified pallet swap and 4.0 pretty much just created fragmentation and added face time. They're out of ideas, Android relies solely on OEM business and IOS will just steal any idea from the next competitor and act as though its innovation.
There is no more WM, WP7 is a new system.
Although it's not bug free and missing some important features, I do love my Windows Phone
It's as smooth as iOS while more vivid (Dynamic Desktop).
Also three hard keys is more comfortable to me.
Not sure how you feel about the endless ROM update of Galaxy S, at least you dont have to deals with lag or fragile system files. No battery drain or GPS tweak. All features work fine on stock.
Cannot predict the future but turn to WP7 is a good move of Nokia, hope their device come out soon.
j3ffmcl34n said:
(Ive been thinking about wanting to give MW7 a whirl.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea I cant wait to play Modern Warfare 7 too
j3ffmcl34n said:
iPhone 3g - 3gs - Android (Galaxy S) user here.
How do you like WP7? I'm genuinely interested to hear.
How is it compared to ios? Android? Is it "too" simple?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not too simple. iOS is too simple. I came from BB to iPhone to Android and now on wp7. And as somebody already stated, Android & iPhone feel somehow....primitive? Its a wierd concept, and I have to give MS a lot of credit here. Always liked their zune/metro UI and the phone is quite the breath of fresh air. The way you interact [through] the interface is untouchable by anything else to me. Its a very simple design, but it feels very engaging and satisfying, while remaining very quick to accomplish tasks ect. It really is like the commercials say: a phone to save us from our phones. Although you could easily get lost in the Xbox Live/games integration
Do you see it as a viable contender in the near future? (Ive been thinking about wanting to give MW7 a whirl.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As a techie/geek, I like to always look at what else is out there, and have tried most platforms at least for awhile (including webOS ect). I don't think it will overtake anything in the near future, but I do think over the next 12-18 months it will no longer be easy to ignore (kind of like what happened to android). After the Nokia announcement especially I think that it will grow quite rapidly. The OS is the first released OS that has felt more solid/responsive than the iOS. The tiles didn't appeal to me at first glance but you just gotta play with it once, and yer hooked.
Android is really nice and powerful, and fun to tinker with, but it still feels sort of half baked, and glued together. Even on the highest end devices it never quite felt professional. And I'm still a big fan of it just because I like to tinker and play with my UI's sometimes. However, after using wp7 for only a few days, its really hard to go back and play with my nexus one.
I also think you will see more professional looking & functioning apps compared to Android. This is something only controlled OS platforms can really benefit from, and why iOS has so many great looking apps, and why they all seem to function so well within the OS. Its easier for developers to create high functioning apps with a great UI when the phones aren't all over the place in skins, UI versions, Hardware types, API's used ect. I have apps on my wp7 that look better than anything I've seen on any other platform already (check out Cocktail Flow if you get a wp7 phone). There are some EXCELLENT apps on android, but for every one of those, there are 5,000 crappy ones that look and feel like they were designed by a couple of real life monkeys, and only serve to add to the ever-so-slight lag of the non-graphic accelerated OS.
Because it will be better for developers, I think that will also make it better for consumers.
Will WP7 be favored by the business community considering it has "word" and "office"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not "favored" in the near term as most power windows users will stick to WM6.5 as it is more feature laden. wp7 is brand new, and as such is missing quite a few more in depth features. Many of these will be addressed over 2011. Once wp7 has been out for awhile and has the power WM has, then I would say yes it will be very attractive to business/power users. The Office integration is very good although still with a few issues.
Although the current implementation is still more powerful than what iOS and Android have for MS documents. And the One Note integration is tops.
How do you feel about the Nokia/MS joint venture?
Will these 2 company's together be able to make something truly great and not just be a competitor? Could they bring new innovations to the market?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I personally was very happy about this. I think HTC, Samsung, LG ect all make good handsets, but Nokia has a great track record of creating very high quality and reliable handsets; and their integrated services (ovi maps ect) are extremely powerful and accurate, and will be a HUGE asset for anybody wanting a wp7 phone. Nokias huge global reach will help wp7 grow quickly, and also force the other manufacturers to start taking their wp7 arms seriously, instead of forcing all their attention on their Android lineups.
Once they announced this partnership, in the wp7 world, **** basically got real. A lot of people were mad, but I see this as a huge benefit to both companies, and especially the potential and current customers of wp7. The other manufacturers will also need to up their game on their wp7 handsets if they don't want to look like a bargain basement alternative to what Nokia can produce.
j3ffmcl34n said:
iPhone 3g - 3gs - Android (Galaxy S) user here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Happy iPhone 4 user here - also an HTC HD7 and HTC HD2
How do you like Wp7? I'm genuinely interested to hear.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I love WP7. It's so refined. It's so refined that it feels luxurious. The keyboard...at least on my HD7...is second to none. The screen transitions and animations are second to none. The auto-rotation is the best there is. I especially love IE.
WP7 is just a pure pleasure to use. I'm glad to have it.
How is it compared to ios? Android? Is it "too" simple?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WP7 doesn't yet have all of the features those others have, but it does have a solid and perfectly function core system. I love my new iPhone, It's probably the best system ever created. It exudes quality through and through. But I feel WP7 is smoother and cleaner in general operation of the core system. Right now, the apps can't yet compare to what the iPhone offers.
As for Android...It's a perfectly fine system that lacks the refinement of either the iPhone or WP7. I use Android on my HD2 and love it in that context. I don't believe I could bring myself to actually buy an Android phone, though, over iPhone or WP7. I was considering the new and unreleased Motorola Atrix 4G for all the new tech and power. But having Android, I was like...meh...and went for the older tech iPhone 4. That's how I feel about Android. It's just not impressive enough to warrant a phone purchase. But I do love it on my HD2.
Do you see it as a viable contender in the near future? (Ive been thinking about wanting to give MW7 a whirl.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see WP7 as serious challenger to iPhone. Its core system already outshines iOS in general user experience and quality of operation. That isn't to say WP7 is perfect. Right now it has a few glaring bugs. If MS deals with the bugs and adds the features, it has the potential to dethrone iPhone for best phone. That is, if MS can keep up the system quality and tightly control provider hardware quality.
Will Wp7 be favored by the business community considering it has "word" and "office"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no view on this.
How do you feel about the Nokia/MS joint venture?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a genuinely positive sign for good things to come for WP7. I'm a little concerned about the freedom Nokia has with WP7; what they will do. But hardware-wise, I think MS hit the jackpot.
Will these 2 company's together be able to make something truly great and not just be a competitor? Could they bring new innovations to the market?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Time will tell. The potential is there, but what Nokia does with its freedom of customization with WP7 is the key.
WP7 is definately a contender. I think it will take the smartphone scne by storm here in the next two years. Microsoft have finally caught on and know what they have to do. They seem to be sticking to it, we just have to sit back and watch. OS seems very solid. A few bugs but thats expected. As far as iOS and Android is concerned, they are abou the same Android is just more open than iOS.
But WP7 is only going forward not to say the other OS' arent. But im sure WP will excel past the competitors once they work out the bugs.
So an OS can be dated when it offers more? When it's already more refined and feature friendly as opposed to flashy and user friendly?
WP7 has potential ... but it amazes me how some folks ignore the obvious and talk up something while talking down something more proven.
To suggest that iOS and Android is, somehow, more "primitive" is sort of laughable. WP7 still has hope .. its been lackluster and unimpressive so far, however. The masses have spoken. I still think 2011 could he huge for the platform ... but a lot has to happen. Directly with WP7 and with not .... speficially outside factors. People don't seem to be letting up on Android ... iOS still the defacto end result .... but WP7 is sorta like the Wii ... the idea is there ... it might even end up outselling everyone .... but it's just different. Honestly feels like a last gen experience ... and not somethng catered to adults. No matter how smooth things can be at times. The Live business is really nothing more than a selling point ... and not a good one at that. Hype, for the kids.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Microsoft have laid an impressive foundation stone with WP7, the UI oozes quality and professionalism, I am only waiting for one more feature (skydrive document sync) which I will get this year. Beyond that, my HD7 fully meets my own particular needs fully right now. I have used Android and always thought it was very similar to WM6.5, my HTC Desire was very laggy and bombed out on me twice with corrupt SD card problems, losing all my data (despite using the best quality 16Gb cards I could find). I also found that over time, the Desire got very laggy unless you really kept on top of what was running in the background meaning frequent soft resets, in comparison, I never feel the need to reset my HD7 (it has reset itself a couple of times, but hey WP7 is brand new!!).
I have not used Iphones much but I do have an Ipad, which is OK but iOS just feels a little dated to me. As for the Nokia thing, I am hoping for some really top of the line industrial design from them, all being well I fully expect to be using a Microkia WP7 phone this time next year!
Not quite ready for prime time...
I think it's half-baked. Not quite ready for prime time. I've been using Windows Mobile or whatever iteration it was in 2002 for a long time and I feel like they've taken one step forward and two steps back with this OS.
Cartoonish, is a good way of putting it. Hopefully, some d**k doesn't tell me to piss-off because of my dissent, as happened to me here earlier this week!
my2cents.
edved said:
I think it's half-baked. Not quite ready for prime time. I've been using Windows Mobile or whatever iteration it was in 2002 for a long time and I feel like they've taken one step forward and two steps back with this OS.
Cartoonish, is a good way of putting it. Hopefully, some d**k doesn't tell me to piss-off because of my dissent, as happened to me here earlier this week!
my2cents.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, and Microsoft's glacial pace of development doesn't help things, nor does their backpedaling on the update process. After I got screwed on yet another trash WM device that was never going to see bug fixes or updates I vowed I'd never again waste my money on WM and I didn't, getting several other devices instead. The biggest selling point for WP7 was that Microsoft would push updates and any user could get them. Then it's no, that's not entirely true. The carrier can block an update if they want to but Microsoft will push the next one through whether the carrier likes it or not. Which we all know will never fly because the carriers have, can and will make stuff up to achieve their aims and since Microsoft has already caved once, they'll cave again and again until, just like bad old days, every device gets one update that may or may not do anything relevant and we all get to sit around and wonder if we should wait or cut our losses and get something else that actually works. Being a Focus owner and given that Microsoft has annouced that there won't be any updates worth talking about until at least the 2nd half of 2011, I wonder that now. Think the Focus will be relevant by the time multitasking is available or will it be "incapable of running the latest system"? I'd say it's about 50/50 given the track records of everyone involved, including Samsung who has an even WORSE record for updates than Microsoft. This isn't some two-bit mom & pop dev shop located above the pizza place on the boardwalk, it's freaking Microsoft and they have what, 4 guys working on this on the days when two of them aren't working on Foxpro? Sure seems that way and I'm tired of reading all the half baked excuses from anyone and everyone who thinks they have a clue about what Microsoft does. This is a company with some of the best minds in the industry and billions of dollars and they're utterly incapable of doing anything that matters in a timely fashion because "they've been burned in the past so they're planning their steps carefully"? Give me a break! WM died years ago, if this system is "just a couple months old" like I keep reading, what were they doing for the past, oh, 3 or 4 years? You know, while iPhone and Android utterly consumed the entire smartphone market and Android became, and remains for the foreseeable future, the best heir to Windows Mobile? That's right, nothing. "Microsoft: Think Nothing"
What some 6.5 advocates fail to realize is that WP7 allows all its features (even if you consider it to be lacking) to be functional. WM6.x was so unreliable, and unresponsive at times, that sure, it had the features... But you couldn't run most of them without the OS crashing... You had to flash a ROM just to fix a feature... Yeah we got to the point of automating the cab installs, but the OS was far behind in terms of usage. So, I think WP7 is the definite step in the right direction, not two steps back, but leaps forward.
I think it would fun if m$ ran with that line for a little while. What do you think?
hardcoreplur said:
I think it would fun if m$ ran with that line for a little while. What do you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
next is fungo than lango the next i dont know
They take everything away,then sell it back to you in pieces. I finally figured it out,MS took all the stuff away so it could monetise the process of bringing it back with banner ads,selling usage stats,etc.
Sent from my 7 Trophy using XDA Windows Phone 7 App
I like : gingerkid
They already stated that WP8 is called "Apollo". (They all end in 'o')
They all end with 'o' indeed. Would have been cooler to name them all after fruits.
Sent from my Samsung Omnia 7 using XDA Windows Phone 7 App
ronalgps said:
next is fungo than lango the next i dont know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
then,it'll be Rango.....lol
It'll be Jingo Jango.
Blamo Whamo ? ?
Vukile said:
They take everything away,then sell it back to you in pieces. I finally figured it out,MS took all the stuff away so it could monetise the process of bringing it back with banner ads,selling usage stats,etc.
Sent from my 7 Trophy using XDA Windows Phone 7 App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sell it back? Free updates are for sell? I think someone is ripping you off. Windows phone is a brand new OS, if they design it with every feature that was in windows mobile and all the new and smooth ui interface, we would still be waiting. Just think about the poor chumps who took up iPhones and android phone at release... iOS users waited 3 year for multitasking, android users don't get updates unless they do it themselves. Window phones users have the best of both worlds, freedom of hardware and updates straight from Microsoft (with some testing by the manufacturer and carrier). Love your phone and support its development, and maybe your ideas will become a part of it.
hardcoreplur said:
Sell it back? Free updates are for sell? I think someone is ripping you off. Windows phone is a brand new OS, if they design it with every feature that was in windows mobile and all the new and smooth ui interface, we would still be waiting. Just think about the poor chumps who took up iPhones and android phone at release... iOS users waited 3 year for multitasking, android users don't get updates unless they do it themselves. Window phones users have the best of both worlds, freedom of hardware and updates straight from Microsoft (with some testing by the manufacturer and carrier). Love your phone and support its development, and maybe your ideas will become a part of it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eh...I was an early adopter of the first iPhone and loved it. It was the best phone I ever owned. I didn't miss any of the things it now has. Mainly because I never had them prior to my iPhone. But I did miss them in WP7 when it was released because I already had all of those features on the previous Windows phone, the HD2 with WinMo.
I'm just glad the car companies don't have to reinvent the wheel, A/C, power steering or and of the modern conveniences we all are accustomed to when they make a new car. I'm also glad the TV makers don't have to reinvent the remote control or any of its other conveniences when they make a new kind of TV.
It seems MS is the only company who feels the need to reinvent common features when they make a new phone OS.
MartyLK said:
Eh...I was an early adopter of the first iPhone and loved it. It was the best phone I ever owned. I didn't miss any of the things it now has. Mainly because I never had them prior to my iPhone. But I did miss them in WP7 when it was released because I already had all of those features on the previous Windows phone, the HD2 with WinMo.
I'm just glad the car companies don't have to reinvent the wheel, A/C, power steering or and of the modern conveniences we all are accustomed to when they make a new car. I'm also glad the TV makers don't have to reinvent the remote control or any of its other conveniences when they make a new kind of TV.
It seems MS is the only company who feels the need to reinvent common features when they make a new phone OS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You seem to miss the fact that WP7 was rushed out the door. They only worked on it about 1 yr before releasing it after scrapping the WM7 project. This is why so much was/is missing. Considering it usually takes 3-4 yrs to develop an OS, I am pleasantly surprised what they did in only a yr.
drkfngthdragnlrd said:
You seem to miss the fact that WP7 was rushed out the door. They only worked on it about 1 yr before releasing it after scrapping the WM7 project. This is why so much was/is missing. Considering it usually takes 3-4 yrs to develop an OS, I am pleasantly surprised what they did in only a yr.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh no, I do know MS released WP7 too early. But even then I still believe it's better than iOS. Don't get me wrong, I love WP7. But it was featureless and some people seem to suggest that common features have to be reinvented with each new system. In the case of Bing navigation, it was a beloved feature of WinMo 6.5 and I felt it was the best free nav ever created. All it needed was recoding for WP7. It didn't have to be reinvented from the ground up. And then release it for WP7 as quickly as possible.
MartyLK said:
Oh no, I do know MS released WP7 too early. But even then I still believe it's better than iOS. Don't get me wrong, I love WP7. But it was featureless and some people seem to suggest that common features have to be reinvented with each new system. In the case of Bing navigation, it was a beloved feature of WinMo 6.5 and I felt it was the best free nav ever created. All it needed was recoding for WP7. It didn't have to be reinvented from the ground up. And then release it for WP7 as quickly as possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, miss understood what you were saying. Also, it's not just a simple re-coding for WP7. WP7 uses mostly DLL's for it's apps. There are very few EXE's, everything else runs through taskhost.exe. Granted it is a MS product, so there's always the argument they could make it run as an EXE.
I've been doing this windows thing since 2003,if you're not sideloading apps you'll basically end up paying for something you once had for free
Sent from my 7 Trophy using XDA Windows Phone 7 App
Tango
Tango has probably Adobe Flash Player 10.3
Well after Google's Ice Cream Sandwich name they can come up with any fancy name, like Orange Crush
its MS NOT M$!!! carajo!!
So, after three loyal years with android. I've become bored.
I just made the leap and ordered a lumia 800.
I... I think i made the right choice.
Also, discussion on coming from android to WP7.
things you miss, things you don't.
You get the drift.
Well same here,three years on android(HTC Hero,HTC Legend and late Samsung galaxy S).
Wp7 feels fresh smooth and trusty,spared me a lot of restarts, factory resets, force close etc.etc.
If only Viber and Skype make their way to wp7.Hope you will like your Nokia and new OS
Skype's coming, and will likely be announced at MWC on the 29th or so.
To the OP, welcome aboard and hope you enjoy it as much as I have. I came from Android (and iPhone, BB, WebOS before....I had a disease that WP seemed to cure).
Do a quick search to see the multiple threads I've probably posted in about the subject. Should keep ya busy for awhile lol.
welcome
Miss the app selection from both Android and iOS
Don't miss the lag and random reboots on my SGS2
Welcome to Windows Phone!
I've made a leap few months ago but only lasted about a month before running back to Android. WP7 is an excellent OS, fluid and consistent. That said, it lacks more then it has, at this time. I look forward to Apollo and will not hesitate to jump back in once it works out my gripes.
Bienvenido a WP7
Yes WP7 rocks. I like it a lot.
Having used WinMo, Android, iOS and WebOS in the last few years: Windows Phone is the best. Very smooth and stable, you're going to love it.
The only downside is the app side at the moment. Don't get me wrong, it has great day-to-day apps minus Skype - for now - but the Marketplace is yet to gain the interest of a lot of devs on Android/iOS. I think that will happen this year.
pLUSpISTOL said:
Having used WinMo, Android, iOS and WebOS in the last few years: Windows Phone is the best. Very smooth and stable, you're going to love it.
The only downside is the app side at the moment. Don't get me wrong, it has great day-to-day apps minus Skype - for now - but the Marketplace is yet to gain the interest of a lot of devs on Android/iOS. I think that will happen this year.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's hope so! The only apps I ever used on Android/webos were tools to over clock the phone because tho OS's were so damn laggy at times. And its my understanding that wp7 has great social networking apps, so that won't be a problem can't wait for this damn phone to arrive now... u guys have made me crave it.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
good choice m8, i too made the jump from android which i utterly started to hate after 6 months having it
Welcome into WP's world
Yeah, I've been really impressed with how responsive and intuitive the WP7 OS is