Related
How do you get kernal to overclock g2 to 1.9mhz
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
I thought at those it blows up!!!
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App
You need flippys g2 fast kernel, http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=839687
Why do you want to OC to 1.9?
Sent from an ice cream sandwich
For me the 1.9 ghz kernel is a bit unstable for every day use . But oc at 1.5cm kernel works much better and 100% sable and battery friendly if you use profile in setcpu.
stian230 said:
For me the 1.9 ghz kernel is a bit unstable for every day use . But oc at 1.5cm kernel works much better and 100% sable and battery friendly if you use profile in setcpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately, that varies by phone. Mine becomes unstable and 1.5GHZ
liltay53 said:
How do you get kernal to overclock g2 to 1.9mhz
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have to say. If you gotta ask dont do it! Make sure you setup good profiles for heat or you run a serious risk of frying your phone! Good luck some people got lucky and have no problems running 1.9. My phone has no problem with that speed until for some reason i have yet to discover somthing makes it heat up at random times. After that happened a few times i decided 1.5 is plenty.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA Premium App
I thinks it's underclocked @ 1.9Mhz
Root the phone
Install ROM Manager from the Android Market
In ROM Manager, flash Clockworkmod Recovery
Also in ROM Manager, backup ROM ("nandroid" backup)
Download the kernel and put it on the SD card.
Flash kernel from Recovery
Get SetCPU or CPU Tuner to set the CPU clock
As already mentioned, if you want to OC that high, SetCPU profiles with temp failsafes, etc. are a must. You might want to start with lower CPU clock speeds.
If you need more guides on how to get this done:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=916431
The Wiki guide is considered the safest way to root:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/wiki/index.php?title=HTC_Vision#Rooting_the_Vision_.28G2.2FDZ.29_and_DHD
kernel manager has it.
Yeah, it does. Unfortunately for me, it's stable for less than five blazingly-fast minutes Guess I'll stay at 1.5!
I think for a phone that was clocked at 800, 1.9 is far too risky. I have no factual basis to say that, just seems like common sense.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA Premium App
^I agree^ That doesn't seem logical....
I can't see OC our phones to 1.9 being good on any level. Seems like were trying to push the hardware a bit too far.
Is that how people are able to get Quadrant scores in the 2000+? I can't seem to get that high at all. I have been using pershoot's kernel with CM7...but now on nightly #91- using stock kernel now. I have been cautious on trying out this one...
liltay53 said:
How do you get kernal to overclock g2 to 1.9mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would you want to clock it down to 1.9 MHz when the stock speed is 800 MHz? Even an XT-8086 ran at 5-10 MHz. An 8080 (the year was 1974) ran at 2.0 MHz.....
dhkr234 said:
Why would you want to clock it down to 1.9 MHz when the stock speed is 800 MHz? Even an XT-8086 ran at 5-10 MHz. An 8080 (the year was 1974) ran at 2.0 MHz.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really think they meant GHz...at least I hope so...
dhkr234 said:
Why would you want to clock it down to 1.9 MHz when the stock speed is 800 MHz? Even an XT-8086 ran at 5-10 MHz. An 8080 (the year was 1974) ran at 2.0 MHz.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, i think he meant GHz, typo =P..
As for quadrant, my DZ easily hits an average of 2100+ when OCed to 1.3GHz using Virtuous G-Lite 1.0.2. I really don't trust those benchmarks though, as long as the battery lasts and the UI is smooth, I can't really complain.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
Well...ok, I was just trying to make sure I wasn't missing a step. I am happy with my phone's performance, so I will not be concerned about that anymore.
Tommebaas said:
I thinks it's underclocked @ 1.9Mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bravo! I can't believe nobody else caught that.
1.9Ghz will sometimes cause my phone to either overheat or crash. I have it set to 1.516Ghz on Pershoot's kernel.
Sent from a Western Union telegram.
Ok, I have search, but didn't find anything like this. I am wondering for those that can overclock, what speed do you use for your daily driver? I don't mean what speed you use just to play with benchmarks.
I know the faster you overclock you have more battery drain, so answer honestly!
I'll be first, I normally run at 1.3ghz, but am now trying 1.4ghz to see how much more battery drain I will have. I love my epic, it has always been fast and stable. What I run is in my signature.
If you feel like it, list your rom, kernel, and what you use to set it. It will be cool to see how fast you guys like to run on a daily diet!
I run at 1ghz... But when aosp roms come out probly 800mhz... My phone doesnt lag at all i see no need for overclocking other than banchmarks.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
I run at 1.2 whenever I can, it shouldn't drain your battery unless yur playing games and shhtuff.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
Same as deano, 100-800mhz conservative, 90% of the time, 100-1200 ondemand rare. I UV also so the 100-800mhz really gets great life.
I run at 1400/100 "on demand" all of the time when on Froyo. No undervolting. I have 2 stock batteries so battery life isn't my #1 priority...everything working and stability is and fortunately 1400 is totally stable for me. I saw a greater performance increase from 1300 to 1400 than I did from 1200 to 1300
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
JohnCorleone said:
I run at 1400/100 "on demand" all of the time when on Froyo. No undervolting. I have 2 stock batteries so battery life isn't my #1 priority...everything working and stability is and fortunately 1400 is totally stable for me. I saw a greater performance increase from 1300 to 1400 than I did from 1200 to 1300
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can almost echo your findings, except I have been running 1300. Out of curiosity how much more battery did you use when you jumped from 1300 to 1400 if you remember?.
I also undervolt a little more from 600 on down than 800 and up, but I rather have more stable than more undervolt. I can't believe how nice hte eipic is even against the current crop of phones. I love it!
Running "on demand" I have noticed very little difference going up to 1400 because its only there maybe 30 minutes per battery charge. It only uses that top setting when its needed. Keeping the undervolt away from those high states will ensure more stability since most of our phones require the voltage on those overclocked states like 1300 and 1400. If you get -25 or -50 stable on those high states, you are pretty lucky
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
I use CFQ and run -50 on 100 - 200 - 300 - 400 - 600 and -25 on 800 - 1000 - 1200 - 1400 and is rock solid thru all of those frequencies.
Do you know if it is better to run less steps, something like 100 - 300 - 600 - 1000 - 1400 rather than how I have it set as above?
Don't forget to vote!
My phone doesn't like 1.4 jiggawatts. I stay at 1.2GHz. I'm running stock ec05 rfs with genocide. 4 hours and 10 minutes in I'm at 68%. With moderate to heavy use. I've been in bed for 2 days with a corneal abrasion. My phones the only thing I can play with lol
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
mouseglider said:
I use CFQ and run -50 on 100 - 200 - 300 - 400 - 600 and -25 on 800 - 1000 - 1200 - 1400 and is rock solid thru all of those frequencies.
Do you know if it is better to run less steps, something like 100 - 300 - 600 - 1000 - 1400 rather than how I have it set as above?
Don't forget to vote!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I ise 100, 200,400,600,800,1000,1100 or 1120 (depends on kernel) and 1400. Its as smooth as can be so I don't try going with less frequencies
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
RushAOZ said:
...1.4 jiggawatts....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like that! If you don't mind, I like to use that in my sig if it works! LOL
Beasty!!!!!....EDIT...1.45 giggawatts...lol
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
mouseglider said:
I like that! If you don't mind, I like to use that in my sig if it works! LOL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lmao sure. Don't quote me though. I saw someone else use it and it made me rofl
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
1.4 jiggawatts!!! I'm surprised my phone didn't lock up. Usually does at 1.4 lol.
Ec05 stock rfs
3.1.0.1 rooted
Genocide yo
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
RushAOZ said:
1.4 jiggawatts!!! I'm surprised my phone didn't lock up. Usually does at 1.4 lol.
Ec05 stock rfs
3.1.0.1 rooted
Genocide yo
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The best way to test stability is to max out both sliders, delect "performance" DON'T SET ON BOOT, and run benchmarks. If it doesn't crash after a few minutes, you should be ok.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
I'm using voltage control. You mean to force the phone to stay at 1.4ghz?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
RushAOZ said:
I'm using voltage control. You mean to force the phone to stay at 1.4ghz?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup exaxtly. do that for a few benchmark tests and try YouTube, etc....pushing the envelope on this one...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
I'm at 1.3ghz. CM7 doesn't like 1.4 for whatever reason.
Not undervolted, but i'm getting 24 hours with 65% leftover.
I'm quite happy!
JohnCorleone said:
yup exaxtly. do that for a few benchmark tests and try YouTube, etc....pushing the envelope on this one...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trap lol got some lock ups during dungeon defenders. All's good at 1.3 though. Thanx for the heads up dood!
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
darkierawr said:
I'm at 1.3ghz. CM7 doesn't like 1.4 for whatever reason.
Not undervolted, but i'm getting 24 hours with 65% leftover.
I'm quite happy!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn darkie, you can't get much better than that!
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Hey guys Just got my hands on a dinc2. I'm coming from the evo shift, its great to see 3.5 roms. Looks like the incredible 2 has a strong community, I will contribute as much as possible.
What are you guys have your kernel OC'd to? How much undervolted can she take? Does anyone use tv-out?
hightech316 said:
Hey guys Just got my hands on a dinc2. I'm coming from the evo shift, its great to see 3.5 roms. Looks like the incredible 2 has a strong community, I will contribute as much as possible.
What are you guys have your kernel OC'd to? How much undervolted can she take? Does anyone use tv-out?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as OC and UV I don't bump it real high, as a matter of fact right now I'm running at 1 ghz (stock speed) if I do OC I'm usually running it at 1.3 ghz.
UV usually a decent is -50 under. Much under that and you could run into freezing up.
I don't remember if TV out works very well with this phone (or at all, I just don't remember lol)
Welcome to this awesome phone.
Sent from my Mikrunny'd Superphone using Forum Runner
I overclock to 1.1 GHz and undervolt -75.
Sent from my HTC_Flyer_P512_NA using xda premium
There is dlna, that's as close to tv out as we can get right now
Sent from my DINC2 in Yuma, AZ
1.3 overclock smartassv2 and 50 mv under
Sent from my ADR6350 using xda premium
I'm really enjoying this phone. I have it OC'd @ 1.2 undervolted 25-50 . Running real strong, and very snappy.
I'm diggn this ext4 touch recovery.
Sent from my ADR6350 using XDA App
hightech316 said:
I'm really enjoying this phone. I have it OC'd @ 1.2 undervolted 25-50 . Running real strong, and very snappy.
I'm diggn this ext4 touch recovery.
Sent from my ADR6350 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Touch Recovery is super slick, no way i can go back. Got mine oc'[email protected] and [email protected] across the board, on sense roms i [email protected] across but on these new ICS roms -25 works just fine, I get decent battery life and a fast phone.
dankblaze said:
Touch Recovery is super slick, no way i can go back. Got mine oc'[email protected] and [email protected] across the board, on sense roms i [email protected] across but on these new ICS roms -25 works just fine, I get decent battery life and a fast phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was going to get ICS a shot tonight, its an SDK build isn't it?
Sent from my ADR6350 using XDA App
hightech316 said:
I was going to get ICS a shot tonight, its an SDK build isn't it?
Sent from my ADR6350 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm9 based. Its built from source.
Sent from my Mikrunny'd Superphone using Forum Runner
hell, on CM7 with aeroevan's .7 cfs kerrnel i've gotten a stable 1800mhz overclock with no undervolting...this phone can take a beating
Welcome to the clan my friend
1.8 is a bit extreme. That's not something you won't wanna keep for long periods of time. I heard that can mess things up potentially.
Sent from my Mikrunny'd Superphone using Forum Runner
Ya be weary.. had the original dinc and I fried it.. its not fun at all.. I could only run skyraider and had to have an extremely uv'd kernel for it to just work normal. If I used GPS I had to have my AC on and my phone shoved in the vent or it would restart
Sent from my ADR6350 using xda premium
Zax_Was_Here said:
hell, on CM7 with aeroevan's .7 cfs kerrnel i've gotten a stable 1800mhz overclock with no undervolting...this phone can take a beating
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesn't heat up quick? What's the highest tempature these snap dragons will take before damaging ?
Sent from my ADR6350 using XDA App
Linch89 said:
Welcome to the clan my friend
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Glad to be here, EVO shift users were mostly rude....
Sorry for dbl post
Sent from my ADR6350 using XDA App
hightech316 said:
Doesn't heat up quick? What's the highest tempature these snap dragons will take before damaging ?
Sent from my ADR6350 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it got pretty warm, but i was careful to make sure i didnt melt a hole in my back cover xD.
I'm not too sure what the max temp these phones can handle is, i'm just giving an extreme example of what the phone can handle, i wouldnt reccomend more than 1.6, at the highest, 1.4 is fine for daily use
Zax_Was_Here said:
Yeah, it got pretty warm, but i was careful to make sure i didnt melt a hole in my back cover xD.
I'm not too sure what the max temp these phones can handle is, i'm just giving an extreme example of what the phone can handle, i wouldnt reccomend more than 1.6, at the highest, 1.4 is fine for daily use
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i've seen mine around 125 deg before
Zax_Was_Here said:
hell, on CM7 with aeroevan's .7 cfs kerrnel i've gotten a stable 1800mhz overclock with no undervolting...this phone can take a beating
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's always cool to do that just for testing purposes but oc'ing your phone to that level will only fry out your cpu faster as well as kill your battery life. not really necessary to oc this phone above 1.3ghz and if you want to save battery uv between -25 to -50.
I have been running 1.4 for a while now. I uv -25, except the top two voltages I leave stock. Might try -50 eventually. Battery life is pretty beasty with smartassv2
Sent from my mobile typewriter with tapatalk
Oh that reminds me actually, when i oc to 1.8 (or is it 1.9, forgot what aero's kernel maxes at) i CANNOT run it at smartassV2
Locks up for me past 1.5ish every time when i'm on smartassv2, i have to switch to smoothass for the phone to work well
However, i've had no problems with smartassv2 below 1.5, which is why i run it on my phone
just a little information/ competition to see which SGS2 is the best , i want to see how low of a voltage you can go. I am using Stability test to test out the voltage, 3 round of classic test at 1.73ghz at 1125mV, and it stable, a little scare to go down more but here some info on my SGS2
running
beastmod 4.2
kernel 2.3.6
Was running originally at 1175 but i undervolt to 1125 and running stable at a stable temp of 41-42..
what's yours
be careful with such drastic undervolting at those frequencies, could result in corrupt nand.
G1_enthusiast said:
just a little information/ competition to see which SGS2 is the best , i want to see how low of a voltage you can go. I am using Stability test to test out the voltage, 3 round of classic test at 1.73ghz at 1125mhz, and it stable, a little scare to go down more but here some info on my SGS2
running
beastmod 4.2
kernel 2.3.6
Was running originally at 1175 but i undervolt to 1125 and running stable at a stable temp of 41-42..
what's yours
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This isn't undrevolting..... this is underclocking.
Undervolting is pretty dangerous with trial and error. The lowest I'll go is -75.
And my frequencies at min 384 and mas 1350 ondemand
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
xxKamikazexx said:
This isn't undrevolting..... this is underclocking.
Undervolting is pretty dangerous with trial and error. The lowest I'll go is -75.
And my frequencies at min 384 and mas 1350 ondemand
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no underclocking meaning i would use less ghz than the stock, this is minimizing the voltage on the core.
what your doing is underclock, i put mine fixed on 1.73ghz at 1125mV of voltage
icenight89 said:
be careful with such drastic undervolting at those frequencies, could result in corrupt nand.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have never heard of such thing, i'm not doubting you but from over the years, i heard undervolting have positive affect on the CPU by lowering temp and give battery more juice.
where did you get those facts from?
G1_enthusiast said:
no underclocking meaning i would use less ghz than the stock, this is minimizing the voltage on the core.
what your doing is underclock, i put mine fixed on 1.73ghz at 1125mV of voltage
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ohhhh my mistake, I didn't catch the mv after the 1125 lol that's why I thought you were only messing with ghz ha ha ha
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
xxKamikazexx said:
This isn't undrevolting..... this is underclocking.
Undervolting is pretty dangerous with trial and error. The lowest I'll go is -75.
And my frequencies at min 384 and mas 1350 ondemand
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I know, there are no dangers associated with undervolting. I run at those frequencies too at -112.5 and have never had a problem of any sort.
I run about 1ghz. No under volt with this ics kernel but with my old gb kernel I undervilted with faux -100 at 1ghz...ran cool even with games and video, great battery life. And honestly 1ghz is plenty for snappy fast speed
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using XDA
i also run 1ghz, runs super smooth across the board
zander21510 said:
I run about 1ghz. No under volt with this ics kernel but with my old gb kernel I undervilted with faux -100 at 1ghz...ran cool even with games and video, great battery life. And honestly 1ghz is plenty for snappy fast speed
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did you undervolt by -100?
yoft1 said:
As far as I know, there are no dangers associated with undervolting. I run at those frequencies too at -112.5 and have never had a problem of any sort.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if you're familiar with overclocking, but the same type of stability issues can occur. When you're undervolting you can think of your stock speed as an "overclock" and you're just trying to minimize the voltage necessary for stability. If you undervolt too much you can experience freezing, corruption, bad lag, etc. It's all the same process for desktop computers, laptops, and anything else you can play with the voltage.
Personally I'm at -62.5, but after seeing how low people are going I might be a bit more adventurous. Don't use the "Set at Boot" option when you're experimenting.
SupaKid said:
How did you undervolt by -100?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did it gradually...and the fact that I was at 1ghz might have also made it possible. Started at -50 since most had said it was safe...then tried 60 then 75 then 90 then maxed at 100...worked beautifully.
I have heard and it is true that phones are made very different. Some exact same models can't oc or UV as high or low as others...I got lucky with a really good model...my old nexus S couldn't oc to 1.4 without freezing while others could.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using XDA
Nice!
Could I try your script?
SupaKid said:
Nice!
Could I try your script?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My bet is he used romanbb's FauxClock (which maxes out at -100mv).
What's the best app to under volt with?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA
asting said:
I don't know if you're familiar with overclocking, but the same type of stability issues can occur. When you're undervolting you can think of your stock speed as an "overclock" and you're just trying to minimize the voltage necessary for stability. If you undervolt too much you can experience freezing, corruption, bad lag, etc. It's all the same process for desktop computers, laptops, and anything else you can play with the voltage.
Personally I'm at -62.5, but after seeing how low people are going I might be a bit more adventurous. Don't use the "Set at Boot" option when you're experimenting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right, I meant that there are no risks to undervolting in terms of physical damage to your phone, only stability issues which is fixed with a reboot, assuming you didn't set at boot. Overclocking is a bit different in that the risk overclocking presents in addition to stability issues is the risk of overheating which can permanently damage your phone. Undervolting can compensate for this somewhat by letting the power supplied to the processor and thus reducing the risk of overheat.
hiz99 said:
What's the best app to under volt with?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use system tuner, you can also look for Gideons script that is flashable in cwm to undervolt.
Im undervolted to -75mv for quite some time running a script clocked at 1.518min384
Sent from MY Juggernaut!!!:thumbup:
I have Gideon's OC/UV script. How could I edit it to undervolt by -100?
SupaKid said:
Nice!
Could I try your script?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup that's what I used lol.
How much can you overclock HTC Desire HD without damaging the hardware?
And how much do you have your Desire HD overclocked right now?
Sent from my mind.
I'm running the HTC Inspire, which is just the DHD +4g radio, keep that in mind though. It shouldn't affect CPU speeds, but who knows.
I've overclocked to 2.1ghz, but the most you'll ever need is 1.5. Past that you get stability issues and no speed increase, at all. It might even slow you down because of random glitches. Oh, and it gets really, really hot.
I usually stay around 1.2 ghz if I expect heavy usage (gaming, HD video), 700mhz for normal usage (web browsing, ebook reading, music)
I dunno about a safe zone, I've heard 1.5ghz and 1.6ghz, but nothing to back either up.
Thank you for your answer
And anyone else?
Sent from my mind.
Constantly on 1.25, I get glitches if I go higher, have to increase voltage in that case, works great for me this way though...
Depends on the rom. I'm using cm7.2 stable at 1.5 ghz and it's fast with no freezes or crashes
Sent from my laser emitting mammary glands.
It also depends on the hardware. Not all devices can OC to the same amount even if on the same set up
Sent from my Inspire 4G using Tapatalk 2
1.3 on interactive governor is my usual. Works flawlessly
As Zelendel points out there is no "safe" overclock, anything over 1ghz is outside the manufacturers stated performance and therefore at your own risk.
Yes I know there is a risk, but I know there is a point where the device starts to lag or glitch. Like more than 1.5 GHz
Sent from my Desire HD using xda premium
Muikkuman said:
Yes I know there is a risk, but I know there is a point where the device starts to lag or glitch. Like more than 1.5 GHz
Sent from my Desire HD using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'd have to test your own hardware, I know of people who can run 2ghz all day and others who struggle with anything over 1.2ghz. Even if you'll run stable at xghz it doesn't guarantee that it's not over stressing your device.
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2
ghostofcain said:
You'd have to test your own hardware, I know of people who can run 2ghz all day and others who struggle with anything over 1.2ghz. Even if you'll run stable at xghz it doesn't guarantee that it's not over stressing your device.
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there anyway to see if your current overclock is stressing your device?
Sent from my Desire HD using xda premium
I can't imagine if you don't touch voltages and only overclock the CPU much can go wrong. In worst case scenario your phone will force reboot if it's OC'ed too high.
I been running my phone on +- 1.5GHz for months now and never had a problem (and definitely higher scores in benchmarks), higher seems useless because in benchmarks you see no more improval.
Anything til around 1.5/1.6GHz should be fine.
I'm currently on rcmixed rom as you can see in my signature, and I'm using daemon controller with andrev_oc using daemon controller standard voltages for overclocking.
what voltage do you use at 1.5 GHz?
Sent from my Desire HD using xda premium
Muikkuman said:
what voltage do you use at 1.5 GHz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my Desire HD using xda premium
It really depends
Hi. It really depends how much your device can be overclocked without losing stability. But I don't think overclocking is really necessary on DHD. With the right ROM, it runs pretty smooth on 1 GHz.
I've installed ARHD 6.3.3. with a couple of its scripts, and it runs extremely smooth on my device and there is no lag whatsoever.
Overclocking really can lower the life of your device.
blinkash said:
Hi. It really depends how much your device can be overclocked without losing stability. But I don't think overclocking is really necessary on DHD. With the right ROM, it runs pretty smooth on 1 GHz.
I've installed ARHD 6.3.3. with a couple of its scripts, and it runs extremely smooth on my device and there is no lag whatsoever.
Overclocking really can lower the life of your device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah that's true =\
Sent from my Desire HD using xda premium
setcpu
can you uninstall setcpu after your dont over clocking?
I can go up to 1.3Ghz, anything higher just freezes the device after some time and I have to pull battery out.
Muikkuman said:
How much can you overclock HTC Desire HD without damaging the hardware?
And how much do you have your Desire HD overclocked right now?
Sent from my mind.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't try to Overclock more then 1.5Ghz.
Hehe I did overclock to 1.8 GHz once and my mobile froze. But I pulled the battery and now I'm running stock speed.
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using xda premium