Related
http://www.sendspace.com/file/zdq9uo
Working:About everything
Broken:Camera works for some people.
Tweaks:What comes with flexreaper, nothing special added in this version. Next version will have build.prop tweaks and hopefully working camera.
If anyone wants to help with development of roms for the iconia a100 just PM me.
Yesterday, I downloaded both Tabooyay and flexreaper from posts found in the Rom Thread in the General section.
Just curious if the two you have posted here in Development are the same or if you have made modifications within the last 24 hours?
I haven't flashed either yet so I'm just curious. Perhaps you could give each a version number or some other identifier.
The MD5's I get are:
Taboonay_A100.zip >> d16775ad627af91e43045d5a686a976a
Flexreaper_A100.zip >> 6b463663fc008ac2cb7a802c960e195b
MD5's are your friend. First thing to tell people to check if they experience issues.
Land Master said:
Yesterday, I downloaded both Tabooyay and flexreaper from posts found in the Rom Thread in the General section.
Just curious if the two you have posted here in Development are the same or if you have made modifications within the last 24 hours?
I haven't flashed either yet so I'm just curious. Perhaps you could give each a version number or some other identifier.
The MD5's I get are:
Taboonay_A100.zip >> d16775ad627af91e43045d5a686a976a
Flexreaper_A100.zip >> 6b463663fc008ac2cb7a802c960e195b
MD5's are your friend. First thing to tell people to check if they experience issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are both the latest version as the ones on the a500 forum
Thanks
Installed it yesterday, works great. Much appreciated.
Does the gold edition work on this ROM
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk
Thanks guys, broken camera is front or back or both? i am using the A500 version of Flex and the front camera is upside down even during chat and Wifi dies after inactivity (already turned it in settings to not do it)
I will try to push a full compatible build for the a100 based on the a100 ICS leak.
Give me some time and I need testers as I don't have a a100.
civato said:
I will try to push a full compatible build for the a100 based on the a100 ICS leak.
Give me some time and I need testers as I don't have a a100.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am very much looking forward to your A100 release. I'm running Flexreaper now using Zeronulls boot.img. If you need me to test anything, I am willing to do so.
Gibson.Dubs said:
I am very much looking forward to your A100 release. I'm running Flexreaper now using Zeronulls boot.img. If you need me to test anything, I am willing to do so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where do I get that boot.img , because from what I hear the stock boot.img doesn't got full root ?
civato said:
Where do I get that boot.img , because from what I hear the stock boot.img doesn't got full root ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The stock boot.img is usable. You may just need to re-root the rom when you flash it.
Will upload first release today
EDIT
To the OP , credit to the original rom builder would be great.
I could care less you changing build.prop , but I do care not being recognized.
It takes many hours to build a good custom rom and to mod.
Thanks , civ.
civato said:
Will upload first release today
EDIT
To the OP , credit to the original rom builder would be great.
I could care less you changing build.prop , but I do care not being recognized.
It takes many hours to build a good custom rom and to mod.
Thanks , civ.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry about that, noone else had took any offense and I appologize for not giving you credit.
blmvxer said:
Sorry about that, noone else had took any offense and I appologize for not giving you credit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem but understand it is all free and for the community so respect is needed.
So again please in your OP you need to refer to the base of the rom , it is even a XDA rule to point to the source.
Thanks.
as for tabooyay not care "[MOD] 2 MicroSD Internal Memory Swap".
otherwise very good ROM prometeur.
good job thanks
Thread closed.
OP was asked to give credit, none was given. If you make a new thread, do so ONLY with giving full credit as to the source of the code..
Download link: http://get.cm/get/jenkins/4629/cm-9.0.0-RC2-galaxysmtd.zip
135.99 MB
2012-07-19 08:03:24
Please close the thread since here already have original thread d...thanks
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1592131
I made this thread because that one specifically states NIGHTLY in the title, and this isn't a nightly like the rest of the ROMs in that thread.
Create a thread only for a link... facepalm
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
vinay427 said:
I made this thread because that one specifically states NIGHTLY in the title, and this isn't a nightly like the rest of the ROMs in that thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should know here is dev ,dun simply put the links only...what is the changelog?can you give a support on it?
If pawitp feels in need of such a thread, he will create it. If not, he won't. Not every worm is allowed to create a dev thread to a ROM he didn't build.
dark_knight35 said:
If pawitp feels in need of such a thread, he will create it. If not, he won't. Not every worm is allowed to create a dev thread to a ROM he didn't build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wasn't trying to offend anybody here, including any of the CM/SGS devs. If I did, I apologise. I just noticed the link posted on get.cm and decided to create a thread to share the news that it was released, seeing as the other thread (judging from its title) seemingly did not apply to this update. I didn't claim anywhere that I had anything to do with the making of this file, as I obviously didn't, and I don't think your calling me a "worm" is in any way necessary or helpful.
EDIT: Also, someone can close this thread, seeing as it didn't fullfill the purpose I made it for.
vinay427 said:
I wasn't trying to offend anybody here, including any of the CM/SGS devs. If I did, I apologise. I just noticed the link posted on get.cm and decided to create a thread to share the news that it was released, seeing as the other thread (judging from its title) seemingly did not apply to this update. I didn't claim anywhere that I had anything to do with the making of this file, as I obviously didn't, and I don't think your calling me a "worm" is in any way necessary or helpful.
EDIT: Also, someone can close this thread, seeing as it didn't fullfill the purpose I made it for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You *might* post such a topic in the discussion thread. If you don't have something useful in developers' viewpoint, don't post it here, for your safety )
dark_knight35 said:
If pawitp feels in need of such a thread, he will create it. If not, he won't. Not every worm is allowed to create a dev thread to a ROM he didn't build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pawitp will not make the thread i guess. There is a particular 'cyanogenMOD' named account from which all RC build threads are made for all devices.
This is really unnecessary. Any fool knows that in the CM9 toppic also indicated when a release comes out. Close this mess!!!!
Verstuurd van mijn GT-I9000
Thanks. For some reason I was unable to find RC2, even though it was being mentioned in the dev thread. One quick Google brought me here.
Might've been better off posting in General.... this is not dev related.
edit: didn't refresh get.cm, had some old stuff cached It appeared
jelle2503 said:
Thanks. For some reason I was unable to find RC2, even though it was being mentioned in the dev thread. One quick Google brought me here.
Might've been better off posting in General.... this is not dev related.
edit: didn't refresh get.cm, had some old stuff cached It appeared
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wonder why nobody posted in dev section as RC1 came out....
dark_knight35 said:
I wonder why nobody posted in dev section as RC1 came out....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe because RC1 has never came out?
Thread closed as original thread exists
Problem solved--Couldn't get Paranoid Android to get past boot logo. What solved it was doing a flash of CM10, then a 'dirty flash' of PA on top of it...I'm guessing that worked because it's CM10 based, but I'm not sure. Either way, there's the solution. Also, CZ, it won't let me edit that title to say solved. Also--any idea on my other thread about why Android File Transfer doesn't work anymore? Skyler, the last thing I need to do is annoy people--I can't even post in dev threads yet!
dubbactrumpetmsu said:
Problem solved
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's considered forum etiquette to do two things here, since your thread is solved.
1) Edit your thread title to include the word "SOLVED" with brackets around it. Like this:
[SOLVED] or [FIXED] or [IGNORE] or something similar.
2) If you fixed your issue, then you might consider typing what you did to resolve the issue, so the next newb-in-need-of-help can read your post and do the same fix.
dubbactrumpetmsu said:
Problem solved
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't do what the above said. It'll annoy everyone if you don't and I think that's great.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
Glad you go this worked out, but it was a known issue that was discussed yesterday right after the rom was posted. Also, this doesn't belong in the Dev section anyway. I'm glad you couldn't post there. Why does everyone think they should post their questions in the dev section when we have a Q/A section? You should have posted it here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1819441
dubbactrumpetmsu said:
CZ, it won't let me edit that title to say solved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you click on the "Edit" and then you click the "Go Advanced" option? That's what lets you edit thread titles.
Sorry, I can't help with the other question.
I fixed the title---and I would have posted there if that thread existed when I posted...as far as I can tell, it came about a few minutes after I posted, and I was already gone. I'll post in Q&A next time then.
i have upgraded to FXP201, but my wifi doens't work, can anyone help???? it was working with FXP 151 beforeeee
demo_demo said:
i have upgraded to FXP201, but my wifi doens't work, can anyone help???? it was working with FXP 151 beforeeee
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same problem... :crying:
Did you flash the new kernel?
Also, wrong section.
Someguyfromhell said:
Did you flash the new kernel?
Also, wrong section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i couldn't post in the android development board, so i thougth i should post here
no, didn't flash the new kernel...do i have to?? cos i didn't for some of the other versions~ will i lose my apps once flashed the new kernal??
thanks
You won't lose your apps if you flash a new kernel
NO wifi...
demo_demo said:
i have upgraded to FXP201, but my wifi doens't work, can anyone help???? it was working with FXP 151 beforeeee
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just on the wifi.. ofcourse it wont on.. just on it . and reboot it... then wifi works.. click thanks if i helped ..
demo_demo said:
no, didn't flash the new kernel...do i have to??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should actually READ the instructions before flashing anything or applying any mods to your Phone, if more People did xda wouldn't be filled with pointless posts like this reporting things have absolutely nothing to do with the ROM/kernel/mod or whatever.
XperienceD said:
You should actually READ the instructions before flashing anything or applying any mods to your Phone, if more People did xda wouldn't be filled with pointless posts like this reporting things have absolutely nothing to do with the ROM/kernel/mod or whatever.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trouble with that is, the original post makes no mention of a new kernel. And there's nothing on the FXP Google site, either about a new kernel for 201.
I would've thought a problem with wifi would definitely be a problem with the ROM/kernel/mod. Trouble with this site is there are far too many posts knocking people down - and with a thread that's only 7 posts long prior to this, a little patience and a point in the right direction to the kernel sources - as you appear to know everything there is to know - wouldn't have gone amiss.
TheHurf said:
Trouble with that is, the original post makes no mention of a new kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
demo_demo said:
no, didn't flash the new kernel...do i have to??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
TheHurf said:
And there's nothing on the FXP Google site, either about a new kernel for 201.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's in the instructions for flashing....
FXP said:
HOWTO
Install instructions:
1. Install a Recovery (there are some around this forum)
2. Flash Rom
3. Flash gapps
4. Wipe (only required 1st time)
5. Flash kernel (fastboot flash boot boot.img)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...which is pretty much a condensed version of what's posted at the CM Wiki - http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/index.php?title=Install_CM_for_anzu
TheHurf said:
Trouble with this site is there are far too many posts knocking people down - and with a thread that's only 7 posts long prior to this, a little patience and a point in the right direction to the kernel sources - as you appear to know everything there is to know - wouldn't have gone amiss.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've replied to a post in the exact same manner I would of with someone who had made 50,000 posts, should you read the instructions before flashing anything, YES as I've stated, and if you or anyone else doesn't like my opinion in response to a user who's started a thread to report an issue then gone on to state they haven't followed all the instructions, tough, you either understand my methods or you don't.
The kernel is in the zip they downloaded which they should already know as they've been running 151.
XperienceD said:
What's in the instructions for flashing....
I've replied to a post in the exact same manner I would of with someone who had made 50,000 posts, should you read the instructions before flashing anything, YES as I've stated, and if you or anyone else doesn't like my opinion in response to a user who's started a thread to report an issue then gone on to state they haven't followed all the instructions, tough, you either understand my methods or you don't.
The kernel is in the zip they downloaded which they should already know as they've been running 151.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for your help, because i have been upgrading from 147 to 151 without flashing the boot.img in the zip file, so i would assume that i dont have to flash it, because the wifi was working all along when i upgraded to the different versions
now that i have flashed the new kernal, it works all fine now!! thanks for everyone who has helped though!
demo_demo said:
thanks for your help, because i have been upgrading from 147 to 151 without flashing the boot.img in the zip file
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ALWAYS update the kernel, then if you do run in to issues like this you know it's something else.
Hello friends
i am uploading the boot.img of stock kernel 2.6.35 i want the other files which are required to make a flashable .zip kernel
please provide requried files and make a zip and post to me
please i request u all
You don't order devs to make something for you.
Also please stop spammimg the development thread, your topics are not development related rather q/a threads
This post is in compliance with the national potato safety regulation.
[Galaxy S 4 LTE]
abhishekr700 said:
Hello friends
i am uploading the boot.img of stock kernel 2.6.35 i want the other files which are required to make a flashable .zip kernel
please provide requried files and make a zip and post to me
please i request u all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:highfive:
ronnieryan said:
You are a JOKE:highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And you're an RC who should be trying to help people, not make fun of them.
Edit: OP, link to source code is needed if you upload a kernel
Jonny said:
And you're an RC who should be trying to help people, not make fun of them.
Edit: OP, link to source code is needed if you upload a kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry for that, im just not in a good mood today, things happened, anyhow what he uploaded is stock kernel pulled from stock rom and he is ordering people around to test the flashable zip that he made if it works
deathnotice01 said:
You don't order devs to make something for you.
Also please stop spammimg the development thread, your topics are not development related rather q/a threads
This post is in compliance with the national potato safety regulation.
[Galaxy S 4 LTE]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
come on i am not ordering
i think u did not read the please word read the post again
abhishekr700 said:
come on i am not ordering
i think u did not read the please word read the post again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is again so rude...
abhishekr700 said:
come on i am not ordering
i think u did not read the please word read the post again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you need to post the source code... #justsayin
Jonny said:
I think you need to post the source code... #justsayin
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He dint done anything i think
He had backed up a stock kernel and posted
Sent from my GT-S5360
fifa2151 said:
He dint done anything i think
He had backed up a stock kernel and posted
Sent from my GT-S5360
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
definitely and Jonny asking for a source code is awkward, since the source is from samsung website and sammys source cannot even boot when not modded
ronnieryan said:
sorry for that, im just not in a good mood today, things happened, anyhow what he uploaded is stock kernel pulled from stock rom and he is ordering people around to test the flashable zip that he made if it works
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but i am not forcing you to test that okk
agosain7 said:
This is again so rude...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no it isnt
fifa2151 said:
He dint done anything i think
He had backed up a stock kernel and posted
Sent from my GT-S5360
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes i wrote it in description that this is just stock kernel which was backuped mby a method i got from a website
and i am asking someone to test it
I am exhausted closing the thread
Hello everyone
because of all the negative replies i have got in here i am closing the thread
abhishekr700 said:
yes i wrote it in description that this is just stock kernel which was backuped mby a method i got from a website
and i am asking someone to test it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
abhishekr700 said:
Hello everyone
because of all the negative replies i have got in here i am closing the thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
let me explain to you why u got so many negative feedback,
1. you posted on development section a backup of a stock kernel (what were u developing?)
2. you want devs to test a stock kernel? (what for?) you have stock kernel when u bought the phone?
3. if you want anyone to test a kernel, you should also upload the source(if it was a custom kernel)
4. You spammed development section by posting a thread which only contains boot.img and the other with your so called flashable zip
5. you act so RUDE, as if you are ordering people around here(what you are trying to do is very3 ancient news, use search button?)
6. you should have searched before doing all the actions above..there were kernel flashers by mai77 method or by faqbly method, and you can get stock boot.img by going to dokys stock ROMs to be flashed via odin,
7. DONT SPAM every reply, there is a button called multi quote
(DONT FEEL BAD, XDA IS A VERY WELCOMING PLACE)
[JUST KNOW YOUR PLACE AND DONT ACT SO RUDE]
ronnieryan said:
let me explain to you why u got so many negative feedback,
1. you posted on development section a backup of a stock kernel (what were u developing?)
2. you want devs to test a stock kernel? (what for?) you have stock kernel when u bought the phone?
3. if you want anyone to test a kernel, you should also upload the source(if it was a custom kernel)
4. You spammed development section by posting a thread which only contains boot.img and the other with your so called flashable zip
5. you act so RUDE, as if you are ordering people around here(what you are trying to do is very3 ancient news, use search button?)
6. you should have searched before doing all the actions above..there were kernel flashers by mai77 method or by faqbly method, and you can get stock boot.img by going to dokys stock ROMs to be flashed via odin,
7. DONT SPAM every reply, there is a button called multi quote
(DONT FEEL BAD, XDA IS A VERY WELCOMING PLACE)
[JUST KNOW YOUR PLACE AND DONT ACT SO RUDE]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey ronnie iam sorry
thanx for telling me about my mistakes
i will remember these in future
Even if you post a stock kernel binary, still needs source or a link to the source (ie, opensource.samsung)...
As for it not booting, that's Samsung's problem
Jonny said:
Even if you post a stock kernel binary, still needs source or a link to the source (ie, opensource.samsung)...
As for it not booting, that's Samsung's problem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Man you are high these days!! Leave the kernel devs here
Go loiter somewhere else