Benchmark Scores - Samsung Galaxy Nexus

This thread is for people to post their benchmark scores.
Please explain:
1.) What ROM/Kernel you are using
2.) What app you used for Benchmarking e.g. CF-Bench / Antutu / Quadrant etc.
3.) What OC/UV settings are in use if any.
Also post a screenshot if possible
Curious to see what scores people are hitting on different ROM/kernel combo's.

I am on Bigxie's v8 rom and his apex kernel with no additional performance settings, here are the results without a fresh reboot;
CF - Bench :
Native: 10895 , Java : 3234 , Overall : 6298
Antutu :
5838
Quadrant :
2057
I rebooted the phone and ran Quadrant again, the score was 1849, then ran again and the score was 2066, Quadrant is a joke I guess Antutu was 5843 after reboot, so, I guess it is more reliable.

Sweet. I am using Android Revolution HD 2.1.3 with Jame Bond kernel at 1.4GHz.
CF Bench total is 7336
Antutu total was 6660
And I don't bother with Quadrant
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

1) AOKP & franco.kernel
2) Quadrant: 2657
3) NO OV & UV
Greets!

I'm on stock rom at the moment.
Antutu : 6095
Quadrant : 1653

Take up enough space or what?
mDroidd said:
1) AOKP & franco.kernel
2) Quadrant: 2657
3) NO OV & UV
Greets!
​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Without a doubt the most ridiculous signature Ive seen on this site. Wow.​

Hi,
Rom:AOKP http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1402341
Kernel:Franco.kernel http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1367341
Running at 350Mhz-1.35Ghz/Ondemand/No other special settings:

Villain ROM with Franco Kernel (no reboot) - not touched any settings
Antutu: 6317
Quadrant : 2443
but i know these mean nothing really.

1-) Stock.
2-)
CF- Bench: 6360
Antutu: 5783
Quadrant: 1417
IFLATLINEI said:
Without a doubt the most ridiculous signature Ive seen on this site. Wow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol me 2.

Agreed on the rediculous signature...must be an attention whore!

Gummy rom with imoseyon's kernel @ 1350mhz gives me ~6700 antutu and 27.7fps in nenamark2

Re,
Brake my own score :
General:
Rom:AOKP
Kernel:Franco Kernel
For both benchs,i killed some apps running in background (not specified in my previous benchs)
Running at 350Mhz-1.35Ghz/Ondemand/No reboot:
Second bench after reboot/Same settings...
I know,i know nothing reliable...Just playing
Nothing else to do
About user UI with this configerfect,no issues,no overheating,no random reboot or SOD...
Benchs aren't says anything but very bad benchs,in general,for the phone i've haded:bad UI,bad games,etc...So in general higher is the bench,higher is the UI for most phones
In any case with that i've posted above always is perfect:smooth,speed,reactive,flyin and...What else

Hi,
Bump
Rom:AOKP build #19
Kernel:franciscofranco nightly #13
Other:governor Ondemand/350Mhz-1350Ghz/No Undervolt/No reboot...
PS:yes i like benchs ,battery drain is good for me so I test the perfs

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
rom stock 402
kernel stock
no uv no oc

1) OAKP rom and Leankernel 1.7.1
2) CF Bench - 6467 Antutu - 6527 Quadrant - 2111
3) No o/c or uv to my knowledge unless it's defaulted in the kernel/rom

I am on stock 4.0.2
Antutu - 6157
CF-Bench - 6636

Hi,
Re bump :
Rom:AOKP build #20
Kernel:Fransico Franco nightly #14.2
Other:Conservative governor/350Mhz-1.35Ghz/No undervolt/No other tweaks/After reboot.

God knows how you get 6000+. Best I ever get it 4500 on aokp and lean kernal!!!!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Quadrant: 2408
AnTuTu: 6437
Franco 14.1 nightly, no oc or uv
Gummy Nex 0.6.6

GR36 said:
God knows how you get 6000+. Best I ever get it 4500 on aokp and lean kernal!!!!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
It depends on many things...
The kernel first (i never tested the Leankernel,by Imoseyon i suppose)...So the cpu freq/gpu overclock,for me everything is notified,details in kernel/rom threads specified...
Then the rom,the rom does not always the job but...
The governor choice,the min cpu frequence...
The conditions:after reboot,apps running in background (killed/not killed) and the most important i think (exept the kernel) is the cpu temperature...
If you run multiple benchs one after the other ->the cpu heats ->thermal protection->lower scores...
Thats all...For me...Just test,reboot,wait for lower cpu temperature,change min cpu frequence,governor,etc...
In any case this thread is just for benchs...
If your Gnex runs well with your settings (rom+kernel),all is smooth and fast and good battery life for you,whatever the benchs scores...You do not care about this.
It's just a "game" i think
As i always said,for me,all is perfect in term of UI (smooth and fast) and battery life...So i test something else ... the benchmarks

Related

[KERNEL][GB] Pershoot-OC-UV-NEON-FP-SWAP-GOVS-1.708ghz

Admin Edit: Links removed at OP request. I believe they will be available elsewhere. I have always ben very anti-setcpu, but profiles with this kernel really are a must if you want a smooth experience without constant freezing.
This is pershoots source code as of 04/25/2011 with added overclocking patches, all governors available, swap (requested) with a max scaling frequency of 1.708ghz (1708800) YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE THE USB MOUNT ISSUES present in flippy's kernel.
YMMV - Overclocking seems pretty unstable above 1.708 with the current state of the kernel (trust me i tried MANY different voltage variables, different schedulers etc..) that's why 1.8 and 1.9 are not supported, and will not be until they are stable for me again.
DO NOT SCALE ABOVE 1.516 without setting scaling governor to performance, or raising the min cpu frequency as you will experience lockups, setcpu profiles are useful in this situation. screen off profiles should have a MAX frequency of above 768 (this way when the screen goes back on it will ramp to the higher freqency THEN ramp back to the oc'd 1.708 without the jump from 245 causing a freeze) if you want to go with ondemand scaling and want the max at 1.708, you will have the most luck with min at 806 (even then it can and likely will freeze)
Edit: testing screen off profiles, it looks like you can pick whatever you want, currently mine us set to 245 min 368 max. No issues yet.
I have my device set for 368 min 1.708 max performance governor on boot and it hasnt frozen in the last two days. scaling through frequencies, or if the delta between min and max is too high, you may get a kernel panic and a battery pull will be required.
My particular setup (recommended):
on boot - 368 min, 1.708 max performance
screen off - 245 min 806 max ondemand (allows idle speed at 245)
battery < 50% 245 min 806 max ondemand
The same rules basically apply with this OC kernel that applied to flippy's. I'm not responsible for any damage that may result from your use of this kernel. yada yada yada.
you should retain wifi, gps, etc.. if not, flash it again, you did something wrong.
freezes? lockups? lower your clock speed, they shouldnt happen with any more frequency than with pershoots kernel if you stay at 1.516 and below. above that, if you experience a freeze, a last_kmsg wont help, the kernel failed to sync and panicked, there is nothing i can do about that. sorry.
wake-lag? i've gone over that, but here we go again:
generally with oc kernels:
oc+screen on/off animations+brightness > 50% = no wake lag
oc+screen on/off animations+brightness < 50% = wake lag
it isnt ideal, but get a program called screen filter from the market to apply a lesser brightness when above 50% so you dont experience the wake lag.
Enjoy.
There is weirdness with benchmarks, if you've oc'd and you know it should be higher, reset the scaling options in cm settings and try again. It's very weird and i havent put together a full list of what causes the behavior, more as it develops i guess.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Awesome thanks. Seems to be pretty stable for me at 1600 ondemand.
Sent from my HTC Desire Z/G2 using XDA App
The benchmark screenie is at 1.7 Ghz?
And thatnkyou for the kernel ..will be checking it out in a while
Works good using your recomended settings
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
It's a stable as I could get it. Been using for a couple days without issue to make sure before I posted it.
Any chance of adding the smartass governor ?
I've read many things about that and nobody never included it in a kernel.
Only in roms.
Your kernel is really good so was wondering
This is awsome! Kernel is running fast and stable. Although i don't clock it all the way up to 1700 i love that i finally can use pershoot kernel with interactive governor.
Thanks very much!
will be adding to my rom on next version
xboarder56 said:
will be adding to my rom on next version
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here if you don't mind
Don't mind at all, for the person who asked, there is source for the smartass governor, I just need to locate it and merge. I'll look into it today.
Will flash tonight with the latest CM nightly. Thanks
This show promise and potential. Love, love love. Did you ever find the source for the smartass governor?
Found the this on github. It's the smartass source from a kernel for the HTC Shift, should be the same mostly.
Also this governor look interesting, maybe give an alpha release with this one in it for testing? Scary just sounds like a bada$$ name for a governor. It's from Scaryghoul btw, just to give credit.
Thanks for this amazinglarry. I'm gonna test this out for a few days before I can give you some useful feedback.
In the meantime, can I refer you to a kernel in the MT4G section that seems to try to accomplish exactly what you are doing (all available kernels, high overclock, etc.). It has all the source readily available. The link is here. http://forum.xda-developers.com/member.php?u=2491887
I'll take a look. Gracias.
Please forgive my ignorance but what might this offer over pershoots kernal? His newest kernal fixed a huge headache I had with wifi and I don't want that headache back. Is it just the addition of higher oc and the added govenators or is there more added as well?
No, just, swap, governors, and overclocking a bit more.
I'm getting instability with the camera and gallery. It either locks up or saves pictures as a black square. Gallery FC's when I try to delete pictures. As far as I recall, this didn't happen with pershoots or stock CM. I'm running 7.0.2 with no profiles, clocked at 245-979 on demand with CM settings, no setcpu. When I can get in front of a computer with adb ill post some logs.
mejorguille said:
I'm getting instability with the camera and gallery. It either locks up or saves pictures as a black square. Gallery FC's when I try to delete pictures. As far as I recall, this didn't happen with pershoots or stock CM. I'm running 7.0.2 with no profiles, clocked at 245-979 on demand with CM settings, no setcpu. When I can get in front of a computer with adb ill post some logs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not able to reproduce, camera and gallery are working st 806 and 1.708 on my device, clear pictures, no force closes.
Grab some logs, there should be very little difference in functionality (if any) between this version and the official version of pershoot's kernel, unless he does some magic that isn't in his git, which I highly suspect, seeing as how quadrant scores are a little lower at the same clock speeds with my version and his.
But as far as functions and drivers, you shouldn't have issues.
I'm thinking its something wrong with my setup. I reflashed pershoots kernel, cleared caches, and ran a fix_permission. I no longer have force closes but my camera isn't saving? Ill have to look into it.
mejorguille said:
I'm thinking its something wrong with my setup. I reflashed pershoots kernel, cleared caches, and ran a fix_permission. I no longer have force closes but my camera isn't saving? Ill have to look into it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me know if you can pinpoint the issue, and need some possible help.

[KERNEL] Bullet v2.9b [11/30/2011][OC,UV,BLN,OTG][FauxClock v0.9][Team Kang]

Team Kang Presents​
Bullet​
Standard Disclaimer - We are in no way responsible for what you do to your phone. If you destroy your $500 device and try and blame us we will laugh at you. Always read and ensure you know what you are doing before attempting anything***​
Features
OC up to 1.83GHz
BLN
Lagfree
OTG USB Support
OC 2d and 3d
BFQ
UV
init.d support
much more inside
Change Log
v2.9b
Ported JRCU (Joe's RCU)
Patched up to 2.6.35.14 from kernel.org
More general code updates and clean up
v2.7b
Back ported CFS Autogroup v2 (Thanks to faux123 for the help when I had a duh moment)
Removed CIQ
A few bug fixes and code updates
Clock speed and governor defaults are 384-1.67 lagfree and screen off 384-540
v2.2b
Added some UV across the entire Freq range
Tuned lagfree a little more for better battery life screen on and off
Tuned ondemand governor for better battery life screen on and off
NOTE
Please see the second post for a new Fauxclock built for Team Kang kernels. It's the only currently supported CPU settings app for this kernel.​
Voltage Control
You can control it via shell/init.d scripts as follows
[ to over volt ALL frequencies by 25000 uv (microvolts) ]
Code:
echo "+25000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/vdd_table/vdd_levels
[ to under volt ALL frequencies by 25000 uv (microvolts) ]
Code:
echo "-25000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/vdd_table/vdd_levels
[ to set a specific frequency (ie 1.18 GHz) with a specific voltage (ie 1.0875 volts) ]
Code:
echo "1188000 1087500" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/vdd_table/vdd_levels
Clock Control
Just about any OC app will work just fine(except system tuner). By default, the kernel sets the max frequency to the highest frequency available. You can change this by adding a few lines to an init.d script (or run commands in a shell).
For instance, setting stock freqs would look like this
Code:
(su if in shell)
echo 1836000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
Info
This kernel will boot to 1.67GHz with lagfree governor enabled. While there is the ability to run up to 1.83GHz in my opinion it's really not needed. With the changes made this kernel is smooth and fast. Battery life has proven to very close to stock with my usage time in the 20+ hour range. I hope you enjoy it!!
Thanks
These are great folks who work hard to better the Android experience!!
romanbb
Whitehawkx
faux123
morfic
Download
Download, Flash, and have fun!!
Bullet 1.8Ghz v2.9b
Bullet 1.8Ghz v2.7b
Bullet 1.8Ghz v2.2b
FauxClock v0.9
Thanks to romanbb for creating this great app!​
Now we can have out cake and eat it too. This app let's you set clock speed and overall VDD voltages. The really cool part is that the processor now works like it's supposed too. You'll notice in FauxClock that the second processor says offline. Well it's supposed to. Now the second cpu only gets powered on when load is high. Once load has stabilized the second cpu goes back offline. Now we can have speed and decent battery life. You'll notice that some bench mark apps will be lower ie CF-Bench. That's because it runs that benchmark with only one core active. Who really cares when your phone is smooth, fast, and lasts all day on a charge!
Download
FauxClock v0.9
System Tuner FAQ​I've been meaning to put this up but haven't had a chance. This FAQ should hold true for any kernel compiled for our phones and the Skyrocket.
When using System Tuner the first thing to do is make sure you can see all running processes in it's task manager. See image below:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Now you're ready to start tweaking the kernel. You see anytime you make a change to the clock speed or governor that both core's come online and stay online. Go back to System Tuner's task manager and select "mpdecision" and kill it. See images below:
Now the second core should be offline and only come back online when needed. Using this method insures that both cores receive the changes you made. Now you won't have one core running lagfree and the other ondemand or a mix match of clock speeds. This really helps the stability of the kernel.
Also note that when you set anything in init.d or at boot to make changes to the kernel settings (ie. voltage, clock speed, or governor) you will have to open System Tuner and kill "mpdecision" to offline the second core.
Voltages​Thought I would post the current voltages that I'm running on my phone. These may not work for you so don't set them at boot until you're sure your phone is stable.
Code:
192000: 812500
310500: 825000
384000: 825000
432000: 850000
486000: 875000
540000: 875000
594000: 875000
648000: 900000
702000: 900000
756000: 950000
810000: 950000
864000: 975000
918000: 975000
972000: 975000
1026000: 1000000
1080000: 1000000
1134000: 1025000
1188000: 1025000
1242000: 1050000
1296000: 1075000
1350000: 1100000
1404000: 1100000
1458000: 1100000
1512000: 1150000
1566000: 1175000
1620000: 1200000
1674000: 1200000
1728000: 1225000
1782000: 1250000
1836000: 1300000
This is where it's at!
Thank you for 2d and 3d overclock
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
The beast is here.
Killbynature said:
Thank you for 2d and 3d overclock
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Too bad it's still hardware locked at 60fps though. It does however seem to smooth out the UI.
You just made my day...Thank you
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
Wowwwwww yes
sent from my real Gs move in silence like lasagna
Is there a reason this is a separate kernel instead of Jugs 0.4?
Ok im still noob status with kernals. Im on Juggernaut 2.6 now. No mods. May I kindly ask where do I start? I wanna break the ice and try this. Do i just download and flash? Sorry i havent read every kernal thread as i never wanted to dive in yet. But I wanna give this a go. I want 20hrs of batt life too. Lol. Thanks ahead of time for any assistance.
Edit- Got assistance.. Thanks Jangst123
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Woot woot!!!
Sent from my HercuBEASTLY Thingy!!!
atrade said:
Is there a reason this is a separate kernel instead of Jugs 0.4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because it's not my kernel? This is cmenard's baby. He's 1000x better at kernels than I am
Romanbb said:
Because it's not my kernel? This is cmenard's baby. He's 1000x better at kernels than I am
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha okay my bad! The real question will be if it can beat the battery life on yours... It is just incredible jugs + juggernaut rom.
atrade said:
Haha okay my bad! The real question will be if it can beat the battery life on yours... It is just incredible jugs + juggernaut rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only one way to find out!
Smooth on lagfree..
Can we only UV via adb? Voltages don't come up in setcpu
Also is bfq or cfq recommended
sent from my real Gs move in silence like lasagna
Romanbb said:
Only one way to find out!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That must be why I just booted out of recovery...
Downloading now. This is getting better and better
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
Ty team kang this thing flies
Sent from my HercuBEASTLY Thingy!!!
is it safe to just slap this kernel on top of Synergy?
or do i have to flash back to Jugger 2.6, before flashing Bullet?
saweet !! DL now

[KERNEL] Jelly Bean IAP SAMURAI (UPDATE 10-10-2012) + Samurai Control App

IAP present Samurai Kernel For Jelly Bean
Samurai Kernel Control app now on google play,
please search google play with a search term such as Samurai Kernel Control to find this. Thank you all for your support.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
SOURCE: Samurai Git
DOWNLOAD: SAMURAI.AKIRA.G.NEX.10.10.20.10.GPU.512.zip Updated 10/10/2012 GPU 512
(compiled with Linaro toolchain 4.7 2012.09)
DOWNLOAD: SAMURAI.AKIRA.G.NEX.10.10.20.12.GPU.384.zip Updated 10/10/2012 GPU 384
(compiled with Linaro toolchain 4.7 2012.09)
DOWNLOAD: SAMURAI.AKIRA.G.NEX.10.07.07.45.GPU.512.zip Updated 10/07/2012 GPU 512
(compiled with Linaro toolchain 4.7 2012.09)
DOWNLOAD: SAMURAI.AKIRA.G.NEX.10.07.07.49.GPU.384.zip Updated 10/07/2012 GPU 384
(compiled with Linaro toolchain 4.7 2012.09)
DOWNLOAD: SAMURAI.AKIRA.G.NEX.10.01.16.56.GPU.512.zip Updated 10/01/2012 GPU 512
(compiled with Linaro toolchain 4.7 2012.09)
DOWNLOAD: SAMURAI.AKIRA.G.NEX.10.01.16.57.GPU.384.zip Updated 10/01/2012 GPU 384
(compiled with Linaro toolchain 4.7 2012.09)
DOWNLOAD: SAMURAI.AKIRA.G.NEX.10.01.05.41.zip Updated 10/01/2012
(compiled with Linaro toolchain 4.7 2012.09)
DOWNLOAD: SAMURAI.AKIRA.G.NEX.09.30.10.27.zip Updated 9/30/2012
DOWNLOAD: SAMURAI.AKIRA.G.NEX.07.18.16.4.zip <-- (BETTER TEMP CONTROL)
DOWNLOAD: SAMURAI.AKIRA.G.NEX.07.02.16.28 <-- (FIXED SLEEP FREQ RESET)
DOWNLOAD: SAMURAI.AKIRA.G.NEX.07.01.18.56
.:CHANGE LOG:.
~ Added in charging animation from samurai aokp rom when power is off...
~ Imoseyon fix for sleep freq reset....
~ misc fixes....
All the Ezekeel tweaks included including:
~ Sound Control
~ Color Control
~ FSYNC <-- (removed due to bricking)
~ Vibrator Control
Trinity Contrast Control Support to correct purple tint (trinity app only)
230mhz-1.8GHz
Pegasus, Samurai Governors included
VR I/O scheduler included
.:WARNING:.
You all know the risks I don't think we have to go through this once again but just in case, I am in no way responsible for any damage to your device that you may cause with this kernel. I in no way recommend overclocking, undervolting, or overvolting in any way, but it is fun isn't it ? ? ?
First
Thank you sir
Again Reserved for Future Use....
Awesome
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Been running this beast since last nite. Not a problem to be found! Colors are great and the battery life seems to be really good so far running @1500 mhz. Thanks for another masterpiece EB!!
No problem as usual, I would like one thing from everyone around here that undervolts... I need some good voltage settings that don't reboot... I would like to lower the voltages but I'm always to busy working on stuff to mess with the voltages to find the sweet spot... I want it to run, no reboots, and still maintain it's overall freq integrity... ANY HELP IN THIS AREA IS GREATLY APPRECIATED.
Told you mine already they are pretty darn low... and work great
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
ÜBER™ said:
Told you mine already they are pretty darn low... and work great
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you send them to me ? and I'm also trying to get a general area of the sweet spot on a bunch of g-nex's not just yours, then I will make the call on what to change the stock samurai voltage to.
earthbound[iap] said:
did you send them to me ? and I'm also trying to get a general area of the sweet spot on a bunch of g-nex's not just yours, then I will make the call on what to change the stock samurai voltage to.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From 230 up to 1500...750,850,1050,1125,1150,1200,1300 been running these with no problems. I will start lowering from here since you want some feedback, and let you know.
Low enough ?
Running it right now
Nice been waiting for this one
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
iSaint said:
Low enough ?
Running it right now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn! I dont think I can beat that!
Coycaine said:
Damn! I dont think I can beat that!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Neither can I
What's a good app to control the screen colors? I have nst tools but that doesn't do color settings
Gnex 4.1
Very nice
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Super smooth and stable. Appreciate the hard work :thumbup:
†††
Dammit I need to buy the trinity apk. The gladdos is not friendly. Why did I buy it.
I use them both and they both work well for me cept trinity always fc's when leaving the app
WARNING DO NOT USE THE FSYNC, JUST BRICKED THE **** OUT OF MY PHONE WITH IT(RECOVERED FROM IT THOUGH)...
I will remove fsync and post a new link to the kernel asap, for now just don't touch that button....
So to flash this I just flash rom then this over it?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
UPDATE: New Kernel Link Up In The OP... Removed fsync due to a bricking issue...

Performance governor

Anyone run this?
The only real reason to run performance governor is for benchmark testing. I wouldn't run it any more than that.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
g_ding84 said:
The only real reason to run performance governor is for benchmark testing. I wouldn't run it any more than that.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most use it that way, as for me i use to keep the high end freq set and to keep the cpu from cycling and wasting battery
Example.... i like to run at 800, i set to preformance so the phone will not cycle lower then 800 no matter what.
Unknown Zone said:
Most use it that way, as for me i use to keep the high end freq set and to keep the cpu from cycling and wasting battery
Example.... i like to run at 800, i set to preformance so the phone will not cycle lower then 800 no matter what.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery life difference?
donsh00tmesanta said:
Battery life difference?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it might be small but little things add up ........instead of bouncing/cycling up and down from low to high freqs cause it is monitoring the processes/work load even when the phone is not in use. Performance takes the cycling/monitoring of the processes out of the equation and just sets the cpu at the high end.
its weird in set CPU it shows it going to 800mhz instead of staying at 1200mhz
Bug? Glitch?
donsh00tmesanta said:
its weird in set CPU it shows it going to 800mhz instead of staying at 1200mhz
Bug? Glitch?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It could be, I use "System Tuner Pro" and when I select "Performance" it stays at 800, since 800 is what I have my high end set at.
Btw I am running EL29 GB with Gunslinger so that is also something to consider.
Edit: I tried different high end freq on performance 1k/1.2k/1.4k and they all were setting and not fluxing to other fregs.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I running rh13
interesting try the free version of system tuner and see if it will stick
Done I'll check in a bit
Same thing
weird, r u running stock? since i only saw 1200 on your high end. btw i am waiting for work that is why I am up.... lol
---------- Post added at 05:55 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:49 AM ----------
i was going to say try a ics overclock kernel but is there any? maybe the stock kernel does not have a performance governor built in
---------- Post added at 05:58 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:55 AM ----------
maybe the stock kernel does not have a performance governor built in
Try agats 4.5 or the kuban kernel. They have the over clocking steps built in.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
I'm stock but tried others
donsh00tmesanta said:
I'm stock but tried others
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try wiping the cache and dalvik before you try the kernels that g_ding stated.
agats or kuban should stick on performance if they still dont....I really dont know what to tell you any more to help.....
g_ding84 said:
Try agats 4.5 or the kuban kernel. They have the over clocking steps built in.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks I knew there were some ICS overclock kernels , I am on GB so I dont look/have ICS stuff.
Unknown Zone said:
Try wiping the cache and dalvik before you try the kernels that g_ding stated.
agats or kuban should stick on performance if they still dont....I really dont know what to tell you any more to help.....
Thanks I knew there were some ICS overclock kernels , I am on GB so I dont look/have ICS stuff.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I always wipe twice
They stick to performance but they down clock to 800mhz not stay at 1200
donsh00tmesanta said:
I always wipe twice
They stick to performance but they down clock to 800mhz not stay at 1200
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm on voltage control. And both kernels show proper scaling and on performance I have it stick to 1200mhz. Do you have CPU spy?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
donsh00tmesanta said:
I always wipe twice
They stick to performance but they down clock to 800mhz not stay at 1200
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You've been using SetCPU and now apparently System Tuner Pro. It's possible you may have EX Tweaks installed as well, ROM Toolbox Pro, or Tegrak.
The thing you want to remember, is that any and all of these utilities can set CPU performance and governors, so you want to be sure that if you are testing with any of them, that ALL of the others are disabled (at least the functions that would control CPU).
That said, I wouldn't be surprised if it's not a kernel issue. You might have Stock, but it may have been modified or not compatible w/OC/UC. Try one of Agat's kernels with confirmed working overclock/underclock (0.4.4) http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1767421
I've been using that with SetCPU and it works well.
Oh - one last point -- do you have any Profiles set up in SetCPU? Because if you do, one of them might be overriding your Performance governor setting on the Main SetCPU screen.
Capp5050 said:
You've been using SetCPU and now apparently System Tuner Pro. It's possible you may have EX Tweaks installed as well, ROM Toolbox Pro, or Tegrak.
The thing you want to remember, is that any and all of these utilities can set CPU performance and governors, so you want to be sure that if you are testing with any of them, that ALL of the others are disabled (at least the functions that would control CPU).
That said, I wouldn't be surprised if it's not a kernel issue. You might have Stock, but it may have been modified or not compatible w/OC/UC. Try one of Agat's kernels with confirmed working overclock/underclock (0.4.4) http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1767421
I've been using that with SetCPU and it works well.
Oh - one last point -- do you have any Profiles set up in SetCPU? Because if you do, one of them might be overriding your Performance governor setting on the Main SetCPU screen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i uninstalled set cpu before using system tuner
i have been using stock, kuban kernel and 4.0 to 4.4 of agats kernels all same issue
zero profiles

Result from My Experiences With CyanogenMod 10 Alpha6

Hey guys.. Maybe I'm new in Android platform. But Linux is my expert as a contributor of Backtrack 5 in Indonesia. It's been 3 months, since I have an Android phone. Yes, my first Android phone is Samsung Galaxy W. So let's see what are the results of my experiences on CyanogenMod.
1st Month:
1. Successfully rooted my device.
2. Successfully install CM Alpha2.
3. Hard Brick because using Swapper2
4. Successfully Revive My Phone by brought it to Service Center (It's free, since I never mention 'brick' and 'root' words)
2nd Month:
1. So I decide to install CM Alpha2 again.
2. Set amount of ZRam Compression will allow you to gain a swap file. Swap file space depend on how much you compress it.
3. Kernel 3.0 didn't support swap file anymore, anyway, changing ZRam compression will affect on antutu benchmark score. Disabling ZRam compression will make higher score.
3rd Month
1. Finally, I choose to pick CM 10 Alpha 4.1 Kernel 2.6. On fresh install, you'll get 62XX score on antutu benchmark. It pretty cool since using stock ROM will get 32XX score on antutu bencmark!
2. Today, I try to overclock my CPU using this patch
3. And Adrenaline Engine
4. Also Unlimited Boost and Seeder.
5. I set my phone using SmartAssV2 Governor with freq between 245 MHz - 1804 MHz, Deadline I/O Scheduler, also without ZRam Compression.
The result is.... I Got 6600 on Antutu Benchmark..
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
If you've got better result than mine, could you share with us?? Any question will be answered here..
:highfive:
Meh, Antutu -- and other synthetic benchmarks -- are meaningless numbers
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
yep,, i dont believe in that too,,, i only got 5500 in benchmarking,, yet i can play nba2k13 ,, six guns by gameloft,, temple run 2,, subway surfers,, gta vice city,, NFS MW, NFS HP, nba jam,riptide gp,, pes 11/12 without lags...
and its doesnt reboot
omegahanggara said:
Hey guys.. Maybe I'm new in Android platform. But Linux is my expert as a contributor of Backtrack 5 in Indonesia. It's been 3 months, since I have an Android phone. Yes, my first Android phone is Samsung Galaxy W. So let's see what are the results of my experiences on CyanogenMod.
1st Month:
1. Successfully rooted my device.
2. Successfully install CM Alpha2.
3. Hard Brick because using Swapper2
4. Successfully Revive My Phone by brought it to Service Center (It's free, since I never mention 'brick' and 'root' words)
2nd Month:
1. So I decide to install CM Alpha2 again.
2. Set amount of ZRam Compression will allow you to gain a swap file. Swap file space depend on how much you compress it.
3. Kernel 3.0 didn't support swap file anymore, anyway, changing ZRam compression will affect on antutu benchmark score. Disabling ZRam compression will make higher score.
3rd Month
1. Finally, I choose to pick CM 10 Alpha 4.1 Kernel 2.6. On fresh install, you'll get 62XX score on antutu benchmark. It pretty cool since using stock ROM will get 32XX score on antutu bencmark!
2. Today, I try to overclock my CPU using this patch
3. And Adrenaline Engine
4. Also Unlimited Boost and Seeder.
5. I set my phone using SmartAssV2 Governor with freq between 245 MHz - 1804 MHz, Deadline I/O Scheduler, also without ZRam Compression.
The result is.... I Got 6600 on Antutu Benchmark..
If you've got better result than mine, could you share with us?? Any question will be answered here..
:highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is there any other bugs for CM10,cause have a bad experience of using CM10 on my phone before..now choose to use CM9 rather than CM10.
1. Please, for the love of all things holy, DO NOT quote the whole OP, especially if it's lengthy like this one's.
2. For bugs & other discussions pertaining CM10, there's a thread for that.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
i did used CM10 before and tested relevant with benchmarking tools,never manage to get scores that more than 4k..don't know whats wrong,mine using sandisk 32gb UHS-1 memory card..so is the version of CM10 matters or what personally matters?
great story and partially it's so funny :laugh:

Categories

Resources