The main reason I got this phone was for the pixel density. I felt I needed it when coming from the iPhone 4.
I know a lot of people here are praising it, but I'm somewhat disappointed.
When I watch videos on it with a fair amount of dark, I notice uneven lighting and streakiness. It also looks like there is a bit of light leaking round the edges of the screen.
Does anyone else notice these or maybe I have a crap phone?
Lots of light bleed and terrible blacks on these screens. I know its HD but I personally will never use anything other than Super AMOLED + ever again.
Its that good.
I can't imagine when Super AMOLED + HD comes out.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
My SGS2 preaches the SuperAMOLED love.
It's the wave of the future.
sean is here. said:
My SGS2 preaches the SuperAMOLED love.
It's the wave of the future.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can't even look at my i9100 after using the Nitro... Texts look like crap on the sgs2
karkas_ said:
Does anyone else notice these
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't, after watching several netflix videos and various youtubes and such. What video were you watching when this happened? I can watch it over here and compare.
karkas_ said:
When I watch videos on it with a fair amount of dark, I notice uneven lighting and streakiness.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What video player are you using? What resolution is the video? What bitrate is the video? You're leaving out some key components.
dalamchops said:
can't even look at my i9100 after using the Nitro... Texts look like crap on the sgs2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea? Hows those black levels and light bleed treatin ya?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Namuna said:
What video player are you using? What resolution is the video? What bitrate is the video? You're leaving out some key components.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree I'm watching HD videos.with no problem.
Sent from my LG Nitro HD
seh6183 said:
Yea? Hows those black levels and light bleed treatin ya?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No light bleed for me. And I don't look at blacks all the time. I do however look at text 100% of the time.
Sent from my LG-P930 using XDA App
I haven't seen any of these issues being stated, screen is one of the best I've ever seen and hd movies look great... I like it better than superAMOLED as the colors feel more real and not as over exaggerated. But amoled seems to have some better power efficiency while maintaining the extra brightness which is pretty impressive.
Sent from my LG-P930 using XDA App
dalamchops said:
No light bleed for me. And I don't look at blacks all the time. I do however look at text 100% of the time.
Sent from my LG-P930 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All of these diplays have light bleed, im sorry you dont know how to look for it. Black levels are extremely important when judging a quality display. This is why plasma has dominated LCD in the tv market for years.
---------- Post added at 04:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:59 PM ----------
akfritz said:
I haven't seen any of these issues being stated, screen is one of the best I've ever seen and hd movies look great... I like it better than superAMOLED as the colors feel more real and not as over exaggerated. But amoled seems to have some better power efficiency while maintaining the extra brightness which is pretty impressive.
Sent from my LG-P930 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats because they are able to turn black pixels completely off which saves power.
seh6183 said:
All of these diplays have light bleed, im sorry you dont know how to look for it. Black levels are extremely important when judging a quality display. This is why plasma has dominated LCD in the tv market for years.
---------- Post added at 04:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:59 PM ----------
lol thanks for your OPINION of what a good screen is. Plasmas has excellent blacks vs LCD, but back up your claims with some facts. Plasmas account for less than 10% market share.
I've seen plenty of good screens, and know what makes a screen good. It's just that Pixel density is more important to ME.
And as for your personal attack, i'll just choose not to retaliate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dalamchops said:
seh6183 said:
All of these diplays have light bleed, im sorry you dont know how to look for it. Black levels are extremely important when judging a quality display. This is why plasma has dominated LCD in the tv market for years.
---------- Post added at 04:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:59 PM ----------
lol thanks for your OPINION of what a good screen is. Plasmas has excellent blacks vs LCD, but back up your claims with some facts. Plasmas account for less than 10% market share.
I've seen plenty of good screens, and know what makes a screen good. It's just that Pixel density is more important to ME.
And as for your personal attack, i'll just choose not to retaliate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That wasn't a personal attack. A personal attack would be to say that statistic you just posted is completely retarded. Plasma has consistently dominated LCD in picture QUALITY not SALES. Since when were we talking about sales? We were talking about picture quality.
There is no opinion about it. The SGS2 screen dominates in that category. Pixel density is better on the Nitro screen, but that's where it stops. That's one category it beats the Amoled screen of about 5.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this screen handles white extremely well.
I read a lot off my phone with kindle and I can say the pure white background on this nitro HD screen, combined with liquid smooth font makes reading on this a joy. and i've yet to find a quibble with playing back netflix vids and streaming some vids I purchased at amazon the quality is as good as i was hoping for on a 4.5" device sporting 720p.
Namuna said:
What video player are you using? What resolution is the video? What bitrate is the video? You're leaving out some key components.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am playing back in the default player because it seems to have the best scrub bar I have found so far (open to alternate suggestions since I'm new ).
I am streaming video @ highest availible setting bitrate from my home server via RemotePotato API in the app called "Remote Media Center." The source is blu-ray riped at 18-20CQ. I don't know what resolution/bitrate it is re-encoded at, but the visual problems I mentioned are not compression artifacts. I do know what to look for.
I can do a side-by-side test with my iPhone 4 and the blacks & darks look considerably more even. Overall, it isn't glaringly obvious, but it annoys me personally.
I expect most non-videophiles probably wouldn't notice.
Ill try to take a picture and post up here to show
seh6183 said:
dalamchops said:
That wasn't a personal attack. A personal attack would be to say that statistic you just posted is completely retarded. Plasma has consistently dominated LCD in picture QUALITY not SALES. Since when were we talking about sales? We were talking about picture quality.
There is no opinion about it. The SGS2 screen dominates in that category. Pixel density is better on the Nitro screen, but that's where it stops. That's one category it beats the Amoled screen of about 5.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude you were talking about MARKET. What else would u be talking about lol.
Some of the highend led lcds has blacks that can match with plasmas while having much better whites, being thinner and more efficient.
Sent from my LG-P930 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
karkas_ said:
I am playing back in the default player because it seems to have the best scrub bar I have found so far (open to alternate suggestions since I'm new ).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AAAaaaah yes, that could indeed be the culprit right there. Until VLC player is finally ported to Android, I highly recommend giving MoboPlayer a try: https://market.android.com/details?id=com.clov4r.android.nil
I've personally tried at least half a dozen different players and Mobo was and still is my favorite (I watch mostly Divx/Xvid encoded AVI files).
Um... no? Please tell me which LCD TV's have black levels equal to a good plasma so I can return my 50" and get this magical LCD... oh and it would help if it had 600hz too.
Anyway the iPhone's screen is the best LCD on a phone in regards to color and contrast imo... sad that this screen can't match it since LG actually makes the iPhone's screen if I recall correctly...
dalamchops said:
Some of the highend led lcds has blacks that can match with plasmas
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LG's 47LW5600 measured .01cd/m2... which is pretty damn good.
Yeah a local dimming LCD, still not that great, response time is slower and it can only dim areas, not individual pixels. Also the algorithm produces artifacts.
"Its edge-lit local dimming LED scheme produces some artifacts and blooming; highlights were somewhat muted in dark scenes; and even from off-angle the picture loses contrast worse than most such TVs." - from the CNet review.
Anyway this is way off topic but there's a reason real home theater systems have a preference for plasma over LCD.
dalamchops said:
LG's 47LW5600 measured .01cd/m2... which is pretty damn good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Related
I'm a graduate student, and as a result I do a lot of pdf reading on my phone. When I first got the phone, I thought the screen looked amazing....a day later I think amazing doesn't even describe it.
A lot of the reviewers constantly state they are disappointed by the resolution. As a matter of principle, it is disappointing that samsung did not up the resolution....but in reality maybe samsung just realized there was not need to..and more functionality comes from this resolution (in terms of apps) and the trade off was not worth it.
I decided to run a side by side test of my epc touch and my evo 3d. I loaded several stem cell papers in the form of pdfs (us stem cell researchers love put pictures in our pdfs). Here is the breakdown.
PDF zoomed completely out, so that it displays the whole page: Winner, Evo 3d. The text is not blurry, but is slight on the epic touch. No one is going to read at this level of zoom....its too small.
Mid level zoom: Winner is epic touch. Both have real clear text, but the contrast on the touch wins out. One nice thing about the touch is, no matter what your brightness, the text looks great...which is nice. One can turn down the brightness, still have well defined text, and avoid eye fatigue.
100% Zoom: Winner again is epic touch. The 3d may have a better resolution, but I am not seeing the gain here. The contrast on the epic really makes for some percise text. The super amloed + screen really signs.
Amont of text on the screen: Wiiner 3d
Quality and readability of text: Epic touch
Quality of pictures and graphs: detail is everything (if you are like me and looking at pictures of flourescent cells in culture, the smallest detial matter). Winner, by far and wide is the epic touch 4g. Let's just put it this way...the detail on the epic touch screen is preferable over ink and paper.
That is my take on the screen. Honestly I don't know where the reviewers get the idea that the text looks pixelated. It just looks bigger....but in no way is it more pixelated than the other phones on the market.
Oh well, that is everything. I am off now. Being a graduate student has its perks....such as having season tickets to the football games.
CHEER CHEER THE FIGHTSING IRISH OF NOTRE DAME!!!
Sent rom my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
Thanks for the insight. I was getting a little scared after reading the reviews, even then they weren't that bad.
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk
Excellent review BlueGoldAce, I feel the same way.
I am just bumping this one time.
I feel it is useful for someone debating whether to get this or not (the more people we have the better).
Also, I typed this whole review on my epic touch, using the hp touchpad keyboard. The touchpad keyboard pairs flawlessly with the touch!
Thank you, I feel the resolution gets some negative reviews but i think you really have to be picky to have a problem with it.
I have tv projector that uses 480x800 and eliminating the pixelation comes down to the type of screen you use and the focus. Its called screen door effect, basically if you do it right it can still look nice and it sounds like samsung did a great job.
not being a schmuck.. just thought it was funny.. the misspelling of "detial".. in the context..
I agree with you about the screen as well.. and if people harass me about the screen res.. I'll just say.. "lets do a side by side with yours" ...... the sad fact is I am the only person I know that would even have a clue on the screen res of a cell phone.
tri0xinn said:
not being a schmuck.. just thought it was funny.. the misspelling of "detial".. in the context..
I agree with you about the screen as well.. and if people harass me about the screen res.. I'll just say.. "lets do a side by side with yours" ...... the sad fact is I am the only person I know that would even have a clue on the screen res of a cell phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol same here
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
This just makes me wonder how ICS will look on this phone.
grayshade said:
This just makes me wonder how ICS will look on this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
I mean the display resolution..
It will be on par with all currently available phones.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
No complaints here! I agree with your assessment.
Did your PDFs have a white background? how did the white compare on the two? My ET's screen has a blue tint when showing white compared to other devices
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
bspec said:
Did your PDFs have a white background? how did the white compare on the two? My ET's screen has a blue tint when showing white compared to other devices
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you change the color of the screen in the settings that should be fixed
drksilenc said:
if you change the color of the screen in the settings that should be fixed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. The whites are not as white, but screen adjustments can fix that. That is just the nature of this screen tec so far.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
So I'm wondering if the screen on the phone is actually nice? I've read mixed reviews but I'm just wondering if its exaggerated or if the screen is actually nice. How would current owners of the device rate it? Is it on par with the retina display? Are pixels actually noticeable? Any info would greatly be appreciated, thanks.
Sent from my SCH-I510 using XDA App
Gja88 said:
So I'm wondering if the screen on the phone is actually nice? I've read mixed reviews but I'm just wondering if its exaggerated or if the screen is actually nice. How would current owners of the device rate it? Is it on par with the retina display? Are pixels actually noticeable? Any info would greatly be appreciated, thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have spent around an hour with it and screen is CRAP compared to iPhone 4. Very very dark even on max brightness and AUTO off. There is no white shade, just grey. If you look closer, you can see individual pixels even they call it HD screen. Very dissapointed, such an amazing design with fresh Android, but terrible screen. Not even SAMLOED+.
iPhone 4 screen is unbeatable.
Really? In a way this wouldn't surprise me, though. My 4 and 4S have always been crisper than the other phones I see. I would've hoped the GN would be better though.
Can you comfortably load a desktop web page and see all the text without zooming?
wow. That sounds absolutely terrible. A nightmare. No white shade, just grey. wow. Just canceled order. Thanks for that.
the screen is brilliant, i love it.
Oh really, huh?
Funny, since usually people complain that AMOLED screens are too ****ing bright.
Crank the brightness up a bit and the GN is a decent screen, certainly better than my NS. Now I also have an iPhone 4s (work made me do it!) and I'd say the colours are a little more realistic on the iPhone. In the end the screen size is of greater benefit to me and fairly soon
Supercurio will have worked his voodoo magic and we will be able to choose whatever colour temperature we want.
Edit... the screen isn't dull in comparison with the iPhone, that's complete crap (sorry). And there are no pixels when zooming in on web pages.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
Tom Servo said:
Oh really, huh?
Funny, since usually people complain that AMOLED screens are too ****ing bright.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Take iPhone 4 and put next to Samsung(max brightness) and you will see HOW dark is sammy`s display and how "white" is white colour - just terrible. Samsung should have used some really premium display in their flagship superphone instead of this crap. I`m so used to superbright retina screen, looking at sammy`s screen felt like its $50 phone.
Hows it compare to QHD screens ((Amaze/Sensation)?
xManMythLegend said:
Hows it compare to QHD screens ((Amaze/Sensation)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had Sensation and its screen was pretty bright, I would say more brighter than GN.
All of you who are saying GN screen is woow/amazing - you haven`t seen iPhone 4 screen. Put both side to side and you`ll see yourself. If you had $20 Nokia, then of course it will be "mind blowing" screen for you.
rbs_uk said:
I had Sensation and its screen was pretty bright, I would say more brighter than GN.
All of you who are saying GN screen is woow/amazing - you haven`t seen iPhone 4 screen. Put both side to side and you`ll see yourself. If you had $20 Nokia, then of course it will be "mind blowing" screen for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Er - I have!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
There are some funny people out there.
IMHO the screen is fantastic. Side by side with the GS2 it blows it out of the water. Sharper, clearer AND bigger. The GS2 looks distinctly low res.
Sure the iphone screen is pretty but its tiny.
Im sure people will disagree with me but thats the great thing about opinions
Can anyone do a side by side screen comparison and post pictures?
rbs_uk said:
I had Sensation and its screen was pretty bright, I would say more brighter than GN.
All of you who are saying GN screen is woow/amazing - you haven`t seen iPhone 4 screen. Put both side to side and you`ll see yourself. If you had $20 Nokia, then of course it will be "mind blowing" screen for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have seen iPhone 4 screen.
I still prefer the Galaxy Nexus screen.
opinion is subjective. you cannot tell me that I am wrong for liking the Galaxy Nexus screen compared to the iPhone 4. you can only disagree with me.
wilbur-force said:
IMHO the screen is fantastic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kind of YES it is - because its huge and high res(it has to be, otherwise pixels will jump into your face)
Side by side with the GS2 it blows it out of the water. Sharper, clearer AND bigger. The GS2 looks distinctly low res.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree, GS2 screen is just junk.
Sure the iphone screen is pretty but its tiny.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
++++, but it doesn`t make GN screen WOOOW or AMAZING.
I had so much hope for GN screen, now its out and I`m struggling to make a decision, but I need larger screen.
It's not really surprising that the iPhone has a "better"screen. It uses a high density IPS panel. IPS is well known for its superior brightness, color accuracy, and viewing angles. There's a reason IPS monitors are so wildly popular in photo/graphic editing fields.
Some will disagree because of their ridiculous iPhone animosity, but they don't really matter.
That said, the GSII screen (the SAMOLED+) is not "junk". Anyone who says otherwise is a fool.
Sent from my Gummy Charged GBE 2.1 using XDA App
onthecouchagain said:
Can anyone do a side by side screen comparison and post pictures?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just google/youtube, quite few. But it doesn`t reflect real life situation because its recorded by camera and it does change colours etc. Go to mobile phone shop, take both and put side by side.
That's funny, I've owned every iPhone iteration except for this latest (4S) and I currently own a Galaxy S II. I took my S II to my friend, who imported a Galaxy Nexus, and is replacing his iPhone 4S (doesn't like it). We cranked the brightness to max on all 3 devices, and then to minimum on all 3.
The Galaxy Nexus had, arguably, the best screen of the bunch. We asked multiple people (5 or 6 of our friends were over) and they all agreed. Watching videos and looking at pictures shows a *WORLD* of difference. The screen on the iPhone is brilliant, but compared to the size and resolution of the Galaxy Nexus...you're kidding yourself if you think it's crap.
Disclaimer: The whites *are* more pure white on the iPhone, and the colors are more true to life; however, that's a common difference betwixt SUPERAMOLED screens and the screen in the iPhone. Some people prefer the higher contrast and color saturation in the AMOLED screens...and I'm starting to agree. After owning every iPhone I used to love them, but now I'm blown away every time I turn on my phone because of the way the colors pop.
Your opinion might be that the screen on the iPhone is better...but to say that the screen on the Galaxy Nexus is crap kind of tells me you've either never seen it in the same conditions as the iPhone or you're expressing your opinion through exaggeration.
rbs_uk said:
Kind of YES it is - because its huge and high res(it has to be, otherwise pixels will jump into your face)
Agree, GS2 screen is just junk.
++++, but it doesn`t make GN screen WOOOW or AMAZING.
I had so much hope for GN screen, now its out and I`m struggling to make a decision, but I need larger screen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok.... the screen did make me go wow ! As it has most people ive shown it to.
I dont agree with the apple corporate way of working so an iphone was never an optiom.
IMHO the GN is the best android screen ive seen.
rbs_uk said:
All of you who are saying GN screen is woow/amazing - you haven`t seen iPhone 4 screen. Put both side to side and you`ll see yourself. If you had $20 Nokia, then of course it will be "mind blowing" screen for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I have. I owned an iPhone 4 before this phone. I prefer the blacks and colours on the GN - much deeper blacks, much more vivid colours.
Whites/light greys, however, are a different story. On high brightness the GN wins, but anything lower and yes, they're grainy, bandy and greyey. Very poor, but I believe it's a symtom of Pentile displays unfortunately.
Those blacks though. Those blacks!
whos selling their s3? i'm willing to buy
oblad said:
whos selling their s3? i'm willing to buy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pm me what size and color you want and ill tell you the price
ionic7 said:
pm me what size and color you want and ill tell you the price
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you a dealer? hope youre not a swindler.
Didn't your last thread get closed?
Inb4lock
The_Biz said:
Didn't your last thread get closed?
Inb4lock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. This kid thinks XDA is like craigslist lol. Go to the Marketplace kid. C'mon kid atleast read the forum rules.
sent from my galaxy s3 using tapatalk 2
babymatteo said:
+1. This kid thinks xda is like craigslist lol. Go to the marketplace kid. C'mon kid atleast read the forum rules.
Sent from my galaxy s3 using tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1000 inb4lock
I have two S3's on mint condition. They're both pebble blue, CDMA Sprint. They're looking for a new owner. PM me if you're interested.
I have a white tmo gs3 in perfect condition comes with box all accessories and an otterbox only asking $450 because im upgrading to the OneX+
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 2
vdub804 said:
I have a white tmo gs3 in perfect condition comes with box all accessories and an otterbox only asking $450 because im upgrading to the OneX+
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You really mean downgrading, but hey it's your money to waste
Better screen better cpu/gpu yea I think that's a downgrade I'm willing to take
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 2
vdub804 said:
Better screen better cpu/gpu yea I think that's a downgrade I'm willing to take
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Htc phone doug. Be carefulll
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
vdub804 said:
Better screen better cpu/gpu yea I think that's a downgrade I'm willing to take
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is that a better screen? To each his own I guess. HTC is so against the development community its an insult.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
elracing21 said:
How is that a better screen? To each his own I guess. HTC is so against the development community its an insult.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I say that because Super LCD2 is better than Super Amoled hd period
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 2
bikrame said:
Htc phone doug. Be carefulll
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bikrame is ABSOLUTELY right bro, also take it from me, I used to be a DIE HARD HTC fan, however, after countless years and devices later I just got sick and tired of waiting for them (HTC) to get their **** together. One can only take so much disappointment before they lose all hope and walk away. I've owned only the latest and greatest of HTC phones on the market, and it was only a matter of inevitable time before the random reboots, crashes and frozen screens come into play, you just get fed up of having to constantly take out the battery to fix your phone... SAMSUNG definitely gets the everyday needs of real world use. Love my SGS3 !!!
Just take a quick look at the link below if you're still not convinced bro... In the end, the choice is totally yours to make... We here at XDA just try to help and inform each other the way family would. Best if luck though bud.
http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/minisite/memory/
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
vdub804 said:
I say that because Super LCD2 is better than Super Amoled hd period
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to my eyes. I prefer the samoled hd screen over the slcd2 any day. But maybe my eyes are messed up....
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
Super AMOLED HD
You’ve probably heard lots of press regarding this display as it’s been the frontman for Galaxy S phones for quite some time now. One of the best features about these display panels is that their black levels are*unparalleled–that is to say that when displaying black, the screen is practically off. This results in much richer detail in images (it’s black level, not white level that increases this quality). Combined with very high brightness and great viewing angles, the result is excellent contrast ratio which makes Super AMOLED displays perform valiantly in the outdoors. You may also hear people describe Super AMOLED colors being “vibrant” and/or “punchy,” which is also due to this great contrast ratio.There are some drawbacks however to this display tech. Due to the nature of how the colors are delivered, Super AMOLED tend to be blue/greenish in color repdouction, which can be unwanted for those preferring neutral color balance. In addition, although the display consumes little power when displaying black, web browsing–which predominantly uses a white background–saps battery life disproportionately quickly. Finally, the display of the Galaxy S III uses a PenTile grid, which decreases*the*actual number of subpixels used on the display (and thus the pixel density)–this is noticeable at high*magnifications, but for most users will go unnoticed.
Super LCD 2
Super LCD 2 is a great all around screen as well. Although it doesn’t have killer black levels or astounding brightness, it has great white balance and accurate color reproduction as well as a true RGB subpixel layout which renders the finest bit of detail. In Chris Ziegler’s review of the One X, he notes that the Super LCD 2 display “[has]*got a near-perfect 180 degree viewing angle and perhaps the most accurate color reproduction and color temperature available…” and furthermore, “At 720p, it falls well into ‘retina’ territory where the individual pixels become invisible to the naked eye.”ConclusionIf the Galaxy S III’s display was a Super AMOLED HD Plus with an RGB stripe display, this debate would simply be a matter of whether you prefer color accuracy or vibrancy of the display, with which the argument could be made that while important for computers, color accuracy is not [as] important on a phone and thus the Super AMOLED’s colors are more*aesthetically*favorable. However taking the PenTile arrangement into account, the rest of the factors can seem to be a moot point to many buyers, especially when they see images like this:
The truth is, unless you have microscopic vision or are purposely looking for image artifacts, there is no way you are going to notice a difference on the screen.
After all of that, it boils down to a matter of personal preference
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
dmarco said:
Super AMOLED HD
You’ve probably heard lots of press regarding this display as it’s been the frontman for Galaxy S phones for quite some time now. One of the best features about these display panels is that their black levels are*unparalleled–that is to say that when displaying black, the screen is practically off. This results in much richer detail in images (it’s black level, not white level that increases this quality). Combined with very high brightness and great viewing angles, the result is excellent contrast ratio which makes Super AMOLED displays perform valiantly in the outdoors. You may also hear people describe Super AMOLED colors being “vibrant” and/or “punchy,” which is also due to this great contrast ratio.There are some drawbacks however to this display tech. Due to the nature of how the colors are delivered, Super AMOLED tend to be blue/greenish in color repdouction, which can be unwanted for those preferring neutral color balance. In addition, although the display consumes little power when displaying black, web browsing–which predominantly uses a white background–saps battery life disproportionately quickly. Finally, the display of the Galaxy S III uses a PenTile grid, which decreases*the*actual number of subpixels used on the display (and thus the pixel density)–this is noticeable at high*magnifications, but for most users will go unnoticed.
Super LCD 2
Super LCD 2 is a great all around screen as well. Although it doesn’t have killer black levels or astounding brightness, it has great white balance and accurate color reproduction as well as a true RGB subpixel layout which renders the finest bit of detail. In Chris Ziegler’s review of the One X, he notes that the Super LCD 2 display “[has]*got a near-perfect 180 degree viewing angle and perhaps the most accurate color reproduction and color temperature available…” and furthermore, “At 720p, it falls well into ‘retina’ territory where the individual pixels become invisible to the naked eye.”ConclusionIf the Galaxy S III’s display was a Super AMOLED HD Plus with an RGB stripe display, this debate would simply be a matter of whether you prefer color accuracy or vibrancy of the display, with which the argument could be made that while important for computers, color accuracy is not [as] important on a phone and thus the Super AMOLED’s colors are more*aesthetically*favorable. However taking the PenTile arrangement into account, the rest of the factors can seem to be a moot point to many buyers, especially when they see images like this:
The truth is, unless you have microscopic vision or are purposely looking for image artifacts, there is no way you are going to notice a difference on the screen.
After all of that, it boils down to a matter of personal preference
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually do notice the difference though. Samoled hd has deeper blacks and whiter whites than the slCD2. So in the contrast category, Samsung wins imo. Although color reproduction, the slcd 2 had more natural tones.
sent from my galaxy s3 using tapatalk 2
Anyone in jersey or.ny can pm me. i got 2 blue 16gb and 1 white 32gb from my upgrades. All brand new never open and still sealed
Sent from my SGH-T999 using XDA App
oblad said:
didnt your last girlfriend leave you for a real man?
babymatteo thinks hes one of us. but look at his name.. sounds like an illegal. go get a social sec # barrito.. c/mon taco maker read the warning signs before entering the US.
sarni84 << +1000 ass kisser.,..and god knows what else connected to 'ass'
dont like blue
sure.. ill pm you.
price?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have reported you and I hope all real members will do the same. We don't need your ignorant, abusive, trash posts here.
And this thread is done as well as the OP
Thread closed
FNM
Which screen display mode do you use and why. I have been using auto but would like to play around with the different modes. I don't know which one gives best battery life or best picture etc
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda app-developers app
I've just been using auto as well. The movie one looks the best to me but I haven't made the switch to using that all the time just yet
Sent from my SM-N900T using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Dynamic. Because if I wanted a dull, lifeless display with subdued color i'd buy some junker with a conventional LCD and call it a day. Super AMOLED is half the reason i'm loyal to Samsung, but color me not happy with the new, less vibrant calibrations on the N3 and S4. They definitely listened to the folks who've moaned ad nauseum over the past few years about wanting more "natural" color, obviously those people do a lot of very important photo editing and web design on their phones.
Luckily there's still a good amount (relative to LCD) of color saturation in dynamic mode which is especially excellent for games, something people actually do on a device like the N3.
Professional photo. Colors on the screen look amazing now!
Sent from my SM-N900T using xda app-developers app
kgbeezr1 said:
Dynamic. Because if I wanted a dull, lifeless display with subdued color i'd buy some junker with a conventional LCD and call it a day. Super AMOLED is half the reason i'm loyal to Samsung, but color me not happy with the new, less vibrant calibrations on the N3 and S4. They definitely listened to the folks who've moaned ad nauseum over the past few years about wanting more "natural" color, obviously those people do a lot of very important photo editing and web design on their phones.
Luckily there's still a good amount (relative to LCD) of color saturation in dynamic mode which is especially excellent for games, something people actually do on a device like the N3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah AMD your screen is gonna look like crap from the psychedelic ad nauseum. Your oled sub pixels are going to burn out much quicker and then you're gonna wonder why your videos and games look like a washed out LCD. Not to mention your phone will use more juice for the extra saturation causing more heat and potential burnout of your CPU/GPU.
Btw, op it is best to use movie for accuracy and battery life. The professional photo mode is a second good option.
Sent from my SM900T.
Granted i'm not a electronics engineer, but i'm not sure if saturation plays a part in burn-out as much as brightness. It would be interesting to know though whether or not higher saturation actually draws more power and causes accelerated dimming of pixels given identical overall light output - Displaymate didn't cover that in their review.
@rbiter said:
Yeah AMD your screen is gonna look like crap from the psychedelic ad nauseum. Your oled sub pixels are going to burn out much quicker and then you're gonna wonder why your videos and games look like a washed out LCD. Not to mention your phone will use more juice for the extra saturation causing more heat and potential burnout of your CPU/GPU.
Btw, op it is best to use movie for accuracy and battery life. The professional photo mode is a second good option.
Sent from my SM900T.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dynamic, because thats the whole point of a SAMOLED screen.
Standard seems a happy medium. Prefer movie myself, do a lot reading and it doesnt strain my eyes in dark room.
I had it on auto mode, just changed to dynamic. Not worried too much about the screen burning. Jump program... N4!!! I never keep phones that long anyway, might as well get the most out of them while you have them.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
When I use my friends iPhones or any 720p phones they look very grainy to me. Is it just me or is it because I have gotten used to the QHD display on my G3? I used to think the iPhone screen size was ok...now when I use it it's like a toy, and I have a hard time navigating the screen ?
Also whenever I use the S4 it definitely feels a little more grainy after you get used to the QHD panel. Is anyone else seeing those sideffects. I think my perception quality expectations is out of the roof now...makes me wonder how people claim that a iPhone PPI is more than enough ?
Same here, every smartphone I am looking at looks kinda grainy, it's hard to describe...
The display of my mother in laws Galaxy core something with it's 800x480 4,3" display looks like a crossword puzzle ☺
Frankly even some 720P phones make the iPhone look grainy, the iPhone is one of the lowest DPI phones you can still buy, it doesn't qualify as HD by any definition.
Yup my other phone is iphone 5 and its sh*t compered to g3 my mother huawei g300 that is just ridiculous
Agreed, even the 1080 phones look quite quite grainy. The sharpening and variable quality screens ruin the G3 display though.
helikido said:
When I use my friends iPhones or any 720p phones they look very grainy to me. Is it just me or is it because I have gotten used to the QHD display on my G3? I used to think the iPhone screen size was ok...now when I use it it's like a toy, and I have a hard time navigating the screen ?
Also whenever I use the S4 it definitely feels a little more grainy after you get used to the QHD panel. Is anyone else seeing those sideffects. I think my perception quality expectations is out of the roof now...makes me wonder how people claim that a iPhone PPI is more than enough ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes my friend is like riding mule after horse.
My MotoG display still looks great though.
ChrisM75 said:
Frankly even some 720P phones make the iPhone look grainy, the iPhone is one of the lowest DPI phones you can still buy, it doesn't qualify as HD by any definition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know it makes me think what the hell are the iPhone fans thinking when they say that 300 PPI is more than enough or 1080p is unnecessary. Even the New iPhone 6 4.7 and 5.5 inch models won't have FHD. Totally will look grainy for sure.
Fir3blade said:
Same here, every smartphone I am looking at looks kinda grainy, it's hard to describe...
The display of my mother in laws Galaxy core something with it's 800x480 4,3" display looks like a crossword puzzle ☺
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol I could spot every pixel on my vibrant with ease. It has a 800×480 resolution too and it's super amoled to make it worse lol
trent999 said:
My MotoG display still looks great though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well yeah, I'm just talking about graininess
Not just you, I also have a Moto X and that screen just screams of pixelation.
I'm starting to see old image assets showing their true low definition in apps, live wallpapers, games ect. Luckyily this isnt a 4k phone or it might be more noticable, as is things will only improve for 2k and 4k as time progresses. I can really tell text has lost the jagged edges it had with my old 720p phone which is nice.
Wanted to add it will be strange seeing mobile devices pushing uhd more than most, remember the image quality android and ois started with?
You sure you're not looking at the S4 with one of those plastic screen protectors on?
Sent from my LG-F400K using XDA Free mobile app
jetsetwilly said:
You sure you're not looking at the S4 with one of those plastic screen protectors on?
Sent from my LG-F400K using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and by plastic are you refering to the anti-glare ones because they definately make a screen look grainy
jetsetwilly said:
You sure you're not looking at the S4 with one of those plastic screen protectors on?
Sent from my LG-F400K using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use tempered glass. So does my other friend. The pentile matrix makes it more noticible.
Sent from my LG Gangster 3
I have a g2 and an S4 in my framily and they both look okay when compared to my G3
grifter9931 said:
I have a g2 and an S4 in my framily and they both look okay when compared to my G3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah they look perfectly fine bro.
Now what has me tripping is how can LG put a qhd resolution on the LG Stylus. That is such a 2010 resolution. I can't imagine what kind of PPi and grainy experience one would have.
helikido said:
Yeah they look perfectly fine bro.
Now what has me tripping is how can LG put a qhd resolution on the LG Stylus. That is such a 2010 resolution. I can't imagine what kind of PPi and grainy experience one would have.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I say they look okay, I mean they look okay... Not fantastic or anything. I personally like the lg g3 display. It doesn't have that saturated look that Apple pushes with almost all of their displays.
It's more like a Eizo or Ben-q monitor. I guess you just have to work on them for period of time to appreciate it..
Some folks will dislike the output and some will make the necessary color adjustments to the device. I have colleagues who have looked at footage or hi res pictures on my device and they like the output..
YMMV
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
grifter9931 said:
When I say they look okay, I mean they look okay... Not fantastic or anything. I personally like the lg g3 display. It doesn't have that saturated look that Apple pushes with almost all of their displays.
It's more like a Eizo or Ben-q monitor. I guess you just have to work on them for period of time to appreciate it..
Some folks will dislike the output and some will make the necessary color adjustments to the device. I have colleagues who have looked at footage or hi res pictures on my device and they like the output..
YMMV
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The S4 and G2 displays are sti some very nice displays buddy. R2member they are still 1080p display.
With the galaxy s series phones you can calibrate the screen really good. On my issue is screen burn in.
The g2 to me is an okay display. The s4,wasn't something I cared for display wise. I still have my G2. I never noticed screen burn in with my g2
I tried using my calibrator on my g2 and I failed!!
When the new devices drop, it will be the same issues. The iPhone will have glue issues like they always. People will complain about the note 4 display until a few updates come out, and people will talk about the moto's radio more than anything else. The N6 will be buttery smooth , and that will be the sticking point for most with each particular device..
Power consumption concerning the higher end displays will be interesting with these devices..
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 07:06 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:00 AM ----------
What's also interesting will be if these displays actually change after being used for a while. My tv needed X amount of burn in time before the calibrator came out and to my place and did some adjustments to the tv.
If anyone can expound on if that is the case with these displays that would be interesting to get some source material on and read up on the subject.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
grifter9931 said:
The g2 to me is an okay display. The s4,wasn't something I cared for display wise. I still have my G2. I never noticed screen burn in with my g2
I tried using my calibrator on my g2 and I failed!!
When the new devices drop, it will be the same issues. The iPhone will have glue issues like they always. People will complain about the note 4 display until a few updates come out, and people will talk about the moto's radio more than anything else. The N6 will be buttery smooth , and that will be the sticking point for most with each particular device..
Power consumption concerning the higher end displays will be interesting with these devices..
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 07:06 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:00 AM ----------
What's also interesting will be if these displays actually change after being used for a while. My tv needed X amount of burn in time before the calibrator came out and to my place and did some adjustments to the tv.
If anyone can expound on if that is the case with these displays that would be interesting to get some source material on and read up on the subject.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LCD displays do in fact cure over time. They just like everything else typically take time to burn in.
helikido said:
Yeah they look perfectly fine bro.
Now what has me tripping is how can LG put a qhd resolution on the LG Stylus. That is such a 2010 resolution. I can't imagine what kind of PPi and grainy experience one would have.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cost, cost, cost.....