Can anyone port ICS to our defy from aosp??
Of course we can, and of course it will be ported...if you people read a bit before posting you would learn that the next version of CyanogenMod with ICS will be CM9. The SDK was just released yesterday so leave them time to work on it . Plus, with our bootloader locked, Quarkx will probably have to make a version of CM9 with the Defy+'s Gingerbread Kernel (our actual one being the Froyo kernel, but i guess it would be too old for an ICS port)
Voilaaa
Sent from my CM7 Defy
crakeron said:
Of course we can, and of course it will be ported...if you people read a bit before posting you would learn that the next version of CyanogenMod with ICS will be CM9. The SDK was just released yesterday so leave them time to work on it . Plus, with our bootloader locked, Quarkx will probably have to make a version of CM9 with the Defy+'s Gingerbread Kernel (our actual one being the Froyo kernel, but i guess it would be too old for an ICS port)
Voilaaa
Sent from my CM7 Defy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought that CM8 will come with ICS. Where I can find this information on cyanogenmod site?
crakeron said:
Of course we can, and of course it will be ported...if you people read a bit before posting you would learn that the next version of CyanogenMod with ICS will be CM9. The SDK was just released yesterday so leave them time to work on it . Plus, with our bootloader locked, Quarkx will probably have to make a version of CM9 with the Defy+'s Gingerbread Kernel (our actual one being the Froyo kernel, but i guess it would be too old for an ICS port)
Voilaaa
Sent from my CM7 Defy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ofcourse not!! As there will be no no SDK port of ICS on CM (source : CM team). We'll only get a port when the official ICS source is out.
Sent from Android 2.3.7
ryan8r said:
Ofcourse not!! As there will be no no SDK port of ICS on CM (source : CM team). We'll only get a port when the official ICS source is out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And right you are.
CM8 as intended for the honeycomb version but its source never released. Thus CM8 wont be there. Hope the same wont happen with ICS. According to an old statment by google ICS source should be released
Related
So there are 2 roms in the android dev section which are based on miui.
1. Galnet
2. DSJ
What are the differences between the two?
Also is anyone who's used this, blown their menu led? is there any way to get all four led's working?
pragund said:
So there are 2 roms in the android dev section which are based on miui.
1. Galnet
2. DSJ
What are the differences between the two?
Also is anyone who's used this, blown their menu led? is there any way to get all four led's working?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At first both roms are only ICS SDK ports and not complete ics roms and I think if you want to see the differences between both you will have to install them yourself.
Galnet is developed by a team of developers and DSJ I guess is developed by the user "davidsonsjesus". Correct me if I'm wrong.
would you have any idea about the led? I would not like to blow off my menu LED just to test the rom.
Thanks
No, sorry, i dont use MIUI. I only use Cyanogenmod... So if you want to try a ICS you could try the AOSP/CM9 rom. But please dont try it if you dont know what to do! Its not stable and there are a lot of things that dont work yet.
iRegistry said:
At first both roms are only ICS SDK ports and not complete ics roms and I think if you want to see the differences between both you will have to install them yourself.
Galnet is developed by a team of developers and DSJ I guess is developed by the user "davidsonsjesus". Correct me if I'm wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they only have framework integratesd and the build.prop that says is 4.0.1 but are gingerbread! and are not compatible with any ICS app
ICS uses sdk 14 apps and ginger bread uses 10 so in the galnet miui or DSJ build uses sdk 10 that are based on gingerbread!
blackwing182 said:
they only have framework integratesd and the build.prop that says is 4.0.1 but are gingerbread! and are not compatible with any ICS app
ICS uses sdk 14 apps and ginger bread uses 10 so in the galnet miui or DSJ build uses sdk 10 that are based on gingerbread!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so do we really get anything significant out of the added ics framework, or just for the name sake???
is it worth having it and risk getting more bugs from it?
where can I get MIUI stable ROM for Defy?
The official miuiandroid.com says that Stable 2.3.7a version is available . But when I try to download it using download page, it has 2.3.5a version.
popcorn1122 said:
where can I get MIUI stable ROM for Defy?
The official miuiandroid.com says that Stable 2.3.7a version is available . But when I try to download it using download page, it has 2.3.5a version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can download stable ROM in miui.com, but it's chinese forum , the latest stable download link: bigota.d.miui.com/2.3.7a/miui_Defy_2.3.7a_12640nfd59_2.3.zip
is that link for english stable miui 2.3.7a ?
popcorn1122 said:
is that link for english stable miui 2.3.7a ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you can changed into english in system config of the rom
pragund said:
So there are 2 roms in the android dev section which are based on miui.
1. Galnet
2. DSJ
What are the differences between the two?
Also is anyone who's used this, blown their menu led? is there any way to get all four led's working?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha.i complete my register,so that i can replay .in my opinion,miui is quite stable include 2.3.7a.wifi is also nice without any reason...
at last,i come from china,miui has chinese cod english you can set language in the system.enjoy 2.3.7a!
iRegistry said:
At first both roms are only ICS SDK ports and not complete ics roms and I think if you want to see the differences between both you will have to install them yourself.
Galnet is developed by a team of developers and DSJ I guess is developed by the user "davidsonsjesus". Correct me if I'm wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those are SDK ports, wouldn't be much different from stock MIUI. btw CM9 AOSP ROM is already out (thanks to epsylon3) and works well in my defy. You can check it out here
is awesome!
DSJ MIUI
Galnet MIUI
Wajk MIUI
lot of 2.3.7
Pikachu MIUI
DOMIUI (in hungarian)
MoZZ MIUI (in hungarian)
i'm waiting MIUI V4...
Wajk porting for Defy...the rom is coming soon
Yep, will it ever get CM 7.2? Are there any devs working on it? Just wondering.
I thought the unofficial builds by erwin and cobje are 7.2??
Officially though I doubt it now as arco and Jacob have moved on to better phones.
Sent from my Wildfire using xda premium
Wich android version is cm7.2?
101112 said:
Wich android version is cm7.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gingerbread 2.3.7
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium
But cm7.1 also haves 2.3.7? What adds cm7.2?
101112 said:
But cm7.1 also haves 2.3.7? What adds cm7.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As per the CM Blog, It was planned to have a final stable release of CM7 to incorporate all the changes that have gone through since the last stable came out, and also since the nightlies stopped. However, now that CM9 nightlies have started, (For some devices), I don't know whether this plan (To get 7.2 Stable) is still on or not.
Basically, if you are already on the local builds by cobje / Erwin, you won't get anything else, apart from a "Stable" in the file name, and the ability to file bug reports on the CM bug tracker (Which will not help, given that CM7 is almost dead)
Ok thank you. Its just like senseonfire beta 0.4 0.5 etc. And jokerdroid 4.2 and 4.3
Tought it was like cm6 cm7 cm9, for every version another android version.
I read in the cyanogenmod forums that that the ROM (the public alpha-1 version) made by arco68 is "unofficial" CM9 ROM. What can be the reason for this custom ROM being "unofficial?"
im sure your not a good of a reader arent you ?
well 1st of all its unofficial because samsung WILL not realease ICS on SGW
and what arco has made is still incomplete ... there is still known bug and unknown bug that hasnt been fix yet ...
and the the ics camera on cm9 for sgw still is not working that's why its not official
chocolemon said:
im sure your not a good of a reader arent you ?
well 1st of all its unofficial because samsung WILL not realease ICS on SGW
and what arco has made is still incomplete ... there is still known bug and unknown bug that hasnt been fix yet ...
and the the ics camera on cm9 for sgw still is not working that's why its not official
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see .
Before my next question, I wanted to clarify first that by "unofficial," I meant the "unofficial CM9" built by arco68. (I am also aware that Samsung will not release "official" stock ROM)
Now, if that's the case, then what is the difference between the nightly builds (which, I assume are the alpha builds, please correct me if wrong) in the cyanogenmod's device page and the build (Alpha-1) version of arco68's ROM?
it's considered unofficial because it's not being released by the core team from cyanogenmod. They don't and can't work on every single device.
Still, cyanogenmod announced recently that they will support and assist whenever possible independent developers (like arco) and make their ports official at some point and, of course, under certain criteria (QC probably).
AFAIK CM9 for the SGW will become an official CM9 release as soon as it gets finished.
If I'm not mistaken all releases of CM9 are still in alpha stage.
Hi guys, just have been wondering if anyone knows about whether there will be an official aokp rom for the phone once htc releases Android 4.0 for it, or not.
Maybe some insiders here?
Thanks
threepointfive said:
Hi guys, just have been wondering if anyone knows about whether there will be an official aokp rom for the phone once htc releases Android 4.0 for it, or not.
Maybe some insiders here?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Edit: sorry, read your question incorrectly.
Back on topic: I don't think they will
Why not?
threepointfive said:
Why not?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are custom AOKP rom running ICS right know and the developers are currently working the minor bugs out of them. I am sure that when the official ICS is released for the DHD the devs will have the final source codes to perfect their roms.
ice cold sandwish is Aokp and aosp and cm same time but yes when every thing is stable and an official android 4 from htc is release for our DHD then expect to see AOKP and CM9 and Sense 4, Sense 3.6 for our device lovely isnt it?
as a user of dhd we can only be patient waiting for a reply from the offical test
Well, it will have to be submitted to the team, and you will need some good maintainers...
Desire S • Fallout V2.0.0 • xda premium
Hello everyone,
now we have a really stable CM9 release and also nearly fully working CM10 builds, I'm wondering whats left to get official CM10 support. Epsylon postet that he an Quarx want to achieve this:
"So we are making a common repo for Defy and Defy+ also, and only this version will have official support..." (or isn't he talking about official CM support?)
CM team posted this diagramm a few month ago. It shows how high the chances are to get official CM9. Well, CM9 seems dead now, but we're still at the marked point I guess:
Now I have two questions: Do you think that even for CM10 a device with same chipset and manufacturer JB is required? Also whats the sense behind this requirement? If we meet Googles ICS/JB APIs and everything is working fine on our device, why do we need other OMAP3 devices with manufacturer ICS/JB?
Maybe we can discuss chances of getting official CM10 in this thread. For me Epsylon seems optimistic, even though he postet this last week:
Epsylon3 said:
Well hmm official will be difficult for the moment because there is not yet OMAP3 devices ....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers!
They need drivers from the same chipset!
Sent from my MB525 using xda app-developers app
ppero196 said:
They need drivers from the same chipset!
Sent from my MB525 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right now are hopes rest on L.G.
They are scheduled to release ICS for Optimus Black in Q3 2012.
It has the same chipset,GPU.
But drivers normaly are a part of the kernel. So manufactured ICS for LG P970 wouldn't bring advantages from my point. In addition we allready have latest GPU driver and all other parts are also working with ICS/JB (Camera, radio, wlan...).
G00fY2 said:
But drivers normaly are a part of the kernel. So manufactured ICS for LG P970 wouldn't bring advantages from my point. In addition we allready have latest GPU driver and all other parts are also working with ICS/JB (Camera, radio, wlan...).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You actually are making sense .
Maybe the only thing we'll need from it would be the omx decoders .(720)
kanpurite said:
You actually are making sense .
Maybe the only thing we'll need from it would be the omx decoders .(720)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hasn't that been donne allready? (See quarx's 11/07 changelog for CM9)
Motorola Defy, CM7 @ 1Ghz + CM9 multiboot
[Guide] Install double boot CM7 + CM9
[Guide][Root needed] Unsimlock your Defy
[Mod/Fix][APP]Messaging apps with ENTER button enabled!
crakeron said:
Hasn't that been donne allready? (See quarx's 11/07 changelog for CM9)
Motorola Defy, CM7 @ 1Ghz + CM9 multiboot
[Guide] Install double boot CM7 + CM9
[Guide][Root needed] Unsimlock your Defy
[Mod/Fix][APP]Messaging apps with ENTER button enabled!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He is talking about Jellybean..
S3nt fr0m my D3fy/w1u1 GB st4BL3
LG Optimus Black won't be getting the ICS upgrade (at least in Canada) : http://www.gsmarena.com/2011_xperia...no_ics_for_optimus_2x_and_black-news-4570.php
I guess there goes our hopes for official CM10.
Didn't we loose it at the "dedicated GPU" anyway? I thought it was our CPU who was also the GPU. Why would Motorola put a dedicated GPU if they never put an android version using HWA on it?
Anyway no biggie, developers versions released after the official 7.1 & 7.2 have always been better than official releases.
EDIT: my bad, specs on gsmarena says we got a PowerVR SGX530 GPU