Develop Bugs

Some comments relative to the photon

I'm mostly posting this for feedback in case I missed something significant - I spent about two hours playing with the epic touch and photon at a sprint store and had these observations:
I had looked at the photon when it first came out and was very impressed (esp the screen quality outdoors - i know a lot of people think the screen on the photon is junk but I actually found it very good - almost as good as the samsung and light years better than the evo3d. It is bright and clear with decent saturation).
-
I spent about 2 hours playing with the photon and epic touch at the store this afternoon. It was not completely fair relative to if i own the phone esp given that they were harnessed but anyways this is what i observed:
Neither could lock on gps in the store (i disabled all location services but gps); with wifi location on they both locked quickly).
The epic touch screen was more vibrant but the photon was brighter and sharper.
the epic camera blows away the photon
(this one really bugs me) the on/off of the epic is in a bad place. I repeated hit it by accident trying to change volume
the epic is a bit wider than i want - had to stretch my hand a little
the photon is a bit denser/center of gravity is more annoying due to density and thickness
the photon is slightly louder than the epic but the epic was clearer and generally sounded a little bit better. Both sounded about the same as a phone but the epics sounded better for youtube videos
i managed to crash the photon playing with the doc (they had a doc with a terminal in the store)
-
I'm a little mixed between the two phones; the epic has the really silly location for the on/off switch and is a tad wider than i wnat else I would definitely go with that phone. The photon is brighter and probably a lot easier to read outdoors (not sure yet becuase they would not let me take the epic outside but i had played with a photon out doors a months ago and it was great out doors in very bright light; in doors the epic was definitely not super bright on max so bit concern it will fade outdoors).
-
For reading web and stuff i like the wider screen but for typing and holding with one hand i kind of wish it was 4 or 4.3 inch - the photon definitely fits better in the hand but it is easier to carry the epic in a pocket due to thinness (I can slip it into a back pocket easy)
-
I'm think i'm going to wait a week and see what sort of issues/complaints develop with the epic before deciding.

Btw; has anyone actually tried to use the touch outdoors in very bright but not direct sunlight (i.e, not in the shade) (that was how I tested the photon; which did amazingly well - where the evo3d completely faded out)

I have been using mine all day, including sunlight. Wasnt bad to me, i could read the text fine and see the pictures. It isnt gonna blow you away, but it seems decent to me.
I have never seen the Photon outdoors so i cant give a comparison.
Sent from my GS2 Epic 4G Touch

Photon switchers some questions

Im thinking bout getting one but was wondering hows the reception, ear piece and speaker quality compare to the photons.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium

The Photon trumps it on all 3.
The earpiece sounds okay but the speakerphone is no match for the Photon. It is loud but sound muffled and distorts at high volume. I hear it crackling when I call Best Buys and get their greeting message.
Reception the Photon win hands down. My Photon gets clear calls even in the fringes. The Epic Touch was choppy.
Still I might just keep the Epic Touch as I use my phone more as a multimedia device than a phone. If the Photon ever solve their problem of the black crush and overly reddish skin tones I will switch back to it.
If you do any decent of calling ( using the phone as a phone) keep the Photon.

Cool thanks probably will stick with the photon then......how's the battery compare?
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium

criptix said:
Cool thanks probably will stick with the photon then......how's the battery compare?
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seemingly better battery life on the E.T. for me. Avg about 2-3 hours more IMO.

I have better battery life with the Photon.
One more note is that my Epic Touch is much more prone to overheating under heavy internet/streaming usage than my Photon. I think that is the trade off of a thin phone. If you look at the Galaxy S2 forum you will see the same complaints of overheating. The reason I mention this is when the battery overheats, the battery life turns to crap.

I had and returned a photon, cheesy qhd display, thick body, it doesnt compare to the et4g. Speed or style or other hardware. Its a ferrari vs a corvette.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App

All i have to say is pentile is trash, i liked my evo's display better
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App

Well its a third more powerful stock and a third thinner, a trade off i'm willing to take
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App

This phone blows the photon out of the water.... PERIOD

The screen of the photon don't bother me its just the lack of devs we got some really good ones like yay, shabby and Sean but it looks like calkulin and some others have switched here. I look at my gfs vibrant screen and it looks horrible compared to the photon. My main concern was audio quality, reception ( my work is in a dip so even with my photon it eats battery due to poor signal) and battery. When im not at work photon is great so that was my reason for asking.....it seems photon has better reception than the epic can a few more photon users chime in with their opinion thanks.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium

I guess that's the other reason im on the fence the vibrant is garbage.....
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium

I have both phones. As much as the fanboys can sit here and talk about how great the ET4G is, they are mostly enamored with the speed and multimedia features of the phone. Shoot, I am enamored with them.
But, in my experience, the Photon gets reception in fringe areas where the ET4G just flat out craps out. The speaker is considerably clearer as are the calls, even on the earpiece and over BT.
I am going to keep both for now, but if I were looking for just an email/phone, the Photon would be my choice. Since my phone also doubles up as a camera and movie player... the ET4G may have to stay.
I think it all depends on what your priorities really are (as for everything else in life).

To answer the OG's questions first:
Reception - not as good out of the box as the Photons, BUT there is a fix available (I've posted it in another thread) that makes the reception almost identical. With the fix, I now get 4g in my apt even though the 4g map shows 4g stops a couple blocks away (however, with the Photon, I got 4g reception in my apt without having to change around any settings).
Earpiece - I STRONGLY prefer the E4GT here. The Photon was OK, but nothing to write home (or on a forum) about. The E4GT has been as close to a landline as I've come since originally using cellphones...
Speaker - about equal. Both sound pretty good on speaker and I haven't gotten any complaints from friends when I put them on speaker. That's the standard I usually apply for judging speakers. However, if we're talking about music speakers, I think the Photon edges out the E4GT here, if only because of the size of the speakers. The E4GT's speaker is small and it's easy to cover up accidentally with your finger.
Display - this isn't even a contest. Anyone telling you the Photon's qHD display is amazing is either stoned, blind, or lying (or possibly just wrong). It is easy to see the pixels when scrolling on that phone, and the colors aren't anywhere near as perfect as those on the E4GT.
Battery - really too soon for me to tell. I had issues the first couple of days with both phones' battery. My issues were resolved with the Photon when I exchanged the battery (which was a pleasant surprise) although they didn't stay away permenantly with the new battery. The E4GT I've had some overheating-while-charging problems, as well as some ridiculously fast drain, but as of yesterday (NO FIX APPLIED whatsoever, mind you) the thing is holding up very well. Been off the charger for 1.5 hrs today and I'm at 99% with two texts sent only. Noteworthy is that the phone's screen is sometimes imprecise if you are charging it via wall outlet. I never had this problem with the Photon. Still, the problem hasn't happened since yesterday, so I'm not sure if my battery and charging problems were just magically resolved on their own and moving forward all will be good. Can report back later...

whatsitsnamenow said:
The Photon trumps it on all 3.
The earpiece sounds okay but the speakerphone is no match for the Photon. It is loud but sound muffled and distorts at high volume. I hear it crackling when I call Best Buys and get their greeting message.
Reception the Photon win hands down. My Photon gets clear calls even in the fringes. The Epic Touch was choppy.
Still I might just keep the Epic Touch as I use my phone more as a multimedia device than a phone. If the Photon ever solve their problem of the black crush and overly reddish skin tones I will switch back to it.
If you do any decent of calling ( using the phone as a phone) keep the Photon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whatsitsnamenow said:
I have better battery life with the Photon.
One more note is that my Epic Touch is much more prone to overheating under heavy internet/streaming usage than my Photon. I think that is the trade off of a thin phone. If you look at the Galaxy S2 forum you will see the same complaints of overheating. The reason I mention this is when the battery overheats, the battery life turns to crap.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Give me a break.

AvatarOfFrost said:
Give me a break.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I bought the Epic 4g and it is a kick ass phone and I passed the Photon to my wife but after using the Epic i took my Photon back. The Epic fanboys are going to tell you that the phone came straight from the gods. The Epic does not have the call quality nor the reception nor the volume that the speaker or speakerphone that my photon has. As far as I'm concerned my Photon has a better build quality than the Epic. Don't get me wrong the Epic is a beautiful phone its just sad how people rag on the Photon when it is a great phone itself.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium

criptix said:
The screen of the photon don't bother me its just the lack of devs we got some really good ones like yay, shabby and Sean but it looks like calkulin and some others have switched here. I look at my gfs vibrant screen and it looks horrible compared to the photon. My main concern was audio quality, reception ( my work is in a dip so even with my photon it eats battery due to poor signal) and battery. When im not at work photon is great so that was my reason for asking.....it seems photon has better reception than the epic can a few more photon users chime in with their opinion thanks.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Calkulin is switching to E4GT? Where did you see that??

At the end of the day these are both top phones... I would say it depends on user preference and needs.

smoothone said:
I bought the Epic 4g and it is a kick ass phone and I passed the Photon to my wife but after using the Epic i took my Photon back. The Epic fanboys are going to tell you that the phone came straight from the gods. The Epic does not have the call quality nor the reception nor the volume that the speaker or speakerphone that my photon has. As far as I'm concerned my Photon has a better build quality than the Epic. Don't get me wrong the Epic is a beautiful phone its just sad how people rag on the Photon when it is a great phone itself.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. This describes my situation precisely. I've been using the E4GT side by side with the Photon (and a normal Epic 4G) since Friday. I was out of town over the weekend in an area with very weak Sprint service. The Photon was a clear winner on signal strength (call quality and data.)
I'm keeping all of the phones as they are all excellent choices, but I will be personally carrying the Photon.

Here are my initial impressions of how the ET4G compares with the Photon
* Reception - Photon is better (able to get consistent signal in fringe areas, though I have no real complaints about the Epic's reception)
* Battery life - Photon is marginally better (consistently able to get 18-24 hours on a single charge with moderate use on Photon: so far the ET4G, looking like 12-18 hours)
* Sound quality - Earpiece is a tie (no huge difference between the 2), but the Photon has a marginally better speakerphone (sounds better at loud volumes)
*Screen - ET4G wins hands down, no contest
* Camera - ET4G blows away every other camera I have ever used on a phone (except for the Nokia N8). If you plan on using your camera as a point and shoot camera, the ET4G is the only option. The ET4G's camera is fast enough to capture moving objects whereas the Photon had no shot whatsoever
* Everything else including performance/bugginess/etc: The ET4G wins pretty much every other category. The performance is absolutely amazing and unlike the Photon, it has no major bugs that I consider dealbreakers
Conclusion: If reception and battery life are the most important factors for you (as well as being able to do GSM internationally), the Photon might be the right choice. However, the E4GT wins in pretty much every other way, and I have to say that I'm quite happy I made the switch.

smoothone said:
As far as I'm concerned my Photon has a better build quality than the Epic.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In your hands it might feel like that because the photon is bigger, but samsung uses different type of plastic then most manufacturers which is a lot more shock resistant and doesn't bend/break.
I'd like to see you do that with the photon or even with an evo

Help sway me

Can someone please convince me that this phone Is better quality than the Amaze. I frigging want to buy this damn thing because you have development going on over here a LOT more than on the Amaze side. I run MIUI when at all possible, and you appear to be on the verge of that. I would just like someone to convince me that processor wise, and technically this Is the way to go. I REALy want to be a Samsung guy, I'm just genuinely trying to overcome my HTC brainwashing.

I came from a long line of HTC products since the g1. Something Samsung does just makes it different than HTC phones. It is way faster and the screen is brilliant. But to really experience the speed of everything about this phone, you have to use it. Specifically on a custom ROM. The entire experience is just flawless.
Swyped from my iPhone eater
-BeastMOD

There'a a reason why there is way more development for the SGS2 than the Amaze. Because the SGS2 is better! The only thing the Amaze has going for it is the camera.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

OLED is better than LCD in terms of color saturation and battery life. Should be your answer right there. Take into account the bigger screen, sleeker design and you have a winner. The Amaze is a fine piece of hardware, but not enough of an improvement from the Sensation to choose to pay more money for the Amaze. If you must go HTC, by a used Sensation and save your upgrade for the next actual HTC beast to be released on T-Mobile, whenever that may be. I personally came from the sensation and would never go back.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App

When I went to the store..I really had my heart set on a amaze because I heard soo much raves about it...and knew about the SGS2... so I had a chance to hold both side by side...compared speed and os side by side... build...screen... etc.
I never looked back. Now my friends who have the amaze keep trying to convince me to trade. NO WAY.
I love this phone.
Sent from my SGS2

Had the amaze, switched to s2. Amaze is great phone, fast, responsive, etc. Quality wise zero problems. Beautiful screen on amaze, liked the high resolution and whites look white (whites have a slight bluish tint on s2). gps on amaze is extremely accurate, best description for s2 gps is sloppy. No matter how I calibrate the s2 gps, it is just not that accurate. Amaze gps would start immediately and show my position within a couple of feet. The s2 gps lags on startup and is usually 15 - 30 feet wide of my location.
Why I switched. Amaze goes through battery way too fast. i was lucky to get five hours before needing a charge. My s2 goes two days. If the amaze was a car it got the equivalent of 8 miles per gallon where the s2 gets 30. Everybody on amaze forum suggesting turning everything of to get better battery life. With s2 I leave gps, 4g, wifi, etc. Always on on get great battery life. Why get a high end phone and not be able to use it. Sort of like buying a ferrari and driving it at 30 mph with lights, radio and heater/ac off so you get better mileage.
Scrolling, screen transistions are smoother on s2. Not a lot but when held side by side with amaze you can pick up difference.
I also did not like that the amaze had its antenna on the back cover. I figured one too many times removing the back cover woukd eventually mess up antena connections. Also, amaze battery was same shape as sensation but different voltage (3.8 vs 3.7). A lot of vendors show the sensation battery as replacement for amaze. However, these phones are a little bit sensitive to even that little bit of voltage diference.

I can sway you over to the sgs2 side by selling you 1

HEY YOU, YEAH YOU!
BUY THE SGS2!!
Why? CUZ IT'S A PLUCKIN AWESOME PHONE!!
There, does that help?
#Havingablast w/ my SGS2

Epic GS2 is epic.
Buy it.
____________________
Deebo took your bike too?

Hey Epic Touch owners I need your help

I had an Evo 3D and honestly didn't really like it. So I "downgraded" to the Nexus S 4G. I like it a lot more and am excited about getting ICS soon but truthfully the thing I really really miss is the bigger screen. I also missed the other core, as scrolling and pinch to zooming is pretty bad on Nexus S 4g. I am a bit of a display snob though, I dont like the WVGA resolution on the Nexus I prefer sharp text and sharper browser pictures like the Evo 3D had (but like the colors of Super Amoled). Anyway, is the Epic Touch 4G the way to go? The phone looks sexy and 4.52 inches of screen is awesome, I'm just concerned that the WVGA stretched out even more will look worse.
What is the difference between Super Amoled and Super Amoled+? The only Sprint store I have has the Epic Touch in the worst possible spot, right in front of a window and the glare makes it tough to compare.
-Phone is mainly for texting, listening to music/podcasts, web browsing, and youtube viewing.
Also, I plan on buying this off contract and I don't make a lot of money so this will be my phone until my upgrade is up in 2013.
Thanks for any input it is much much appreciated.

Personally I love the screen of my phone but I wish it was HD like the galaxy nexus or the iPhone.
Here is an article that may help u understand the differences between super amoled vs super amoled plus.
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Supe...AMOLED-to-the-PenTile-matrix-and-back_id18700
Sent from my Galaxy S Two Epic Four G Touch Becky Becky-Stan

I am running an ICS ROM with a custom kernel that has voodoo sound and color support on my NS4G. It greatly improves the sound and the colors on the screen. I have both phones and while the Nexus is nice, the ET4G is simply amazing! The speed, smoothness, battery life, camera, etc are definitely a step up on the Epic Touch. Here's a screenie of the NS4G with custom voodoo color settings. The colors are much more vibrant than on a stock setup
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium

Yes I love the voodoo sound quite a bit, it made me invest in a nice pair of headphones and its worth every penny. I actually like the stock colors just fine, I absolutely love the colors of super amoled what I don't like is the resolution. I would keep my Nexus S 4G as an MP3 player if i get an Epic Touch just cuz the sound chip with voodoo is so beast.
Thanks for the article an Super AMoled vs. Super Amoled Plus. Im gonna get to reading that, from what I understand Super Amoled + is sharper and less pixelated, that is my biggest problem with regular Amoled so that would be awesome. Those HD displays on the other carriers are so tempting, but if Super AMoled Plus fixes the pentile issues, the Epic Touch would be rocking a 4.5 inch screen exynos monster and that's just tough to beat.

I moved from the Evo3D to the E4GT. I am not looking back. I love that it has a larger, more vibrant display and that it's lighter. I DO miss the solid feel of the Evo3D, and the grippy back. Sometimes the slippery back of the E4GT makes me feel like I'm going to drop it, so I just have to remember to hold it tighter than I normally would. I know I could get a case, but that takes away from the sexiness of the device IMHO. I guess I'm not too worried about damaging it since I can get new phones anytime I want. I'd say, it's a no brainer. Go with the E4GT, you won't be disappointed.

My girlfriend and I are on a shared plan. I had been waiting on the GS2 to hit sprint ever since the phone first debuted internationally. Just recently I got her to trade her evo 4g for a Nexus.
I would agree with you about the sound DAC on the Nexus s, it's beast if you have voodoo sound. But the GS2 isn't half bad either. I stream google music every day at work and with a decent set of headphones (for reference I use altec lansing backbeat titaniums, they are out of production but pretty much the best in ear buds you can get for under $50) the sound is quite good. It doesn't get as loud as the nexus due to a weaker headphone amp, but it gets the job done. (haha I can't say enough good things about voodoo, if you turn that headphone amp all the way up with good earbuds, you could pretty much blow your eardrums...)
Also, the whole 720p screen deal is really overrated. I checked out the Galaxy Nexus at a verizon store and honestly I still prefer my ET4G. And don't even bother comparing the Evo 3d's screen the the GS2, that would be a straight up insult. After owning an ET4G for a few months, all of the HTC screens just look like garbage. I would easily sacrifice resolution for quality, and any GS2, ours included, really delivers on quality.
If you were gonna buy off contract, it doesn't really matter when you buy I suppose, but the sooner the better I suppose. By the time this phone is truly obsolete (it's hard to say when, because phone tech is really becoming more advanced overnight) I would imagine that LTE will start rolling out on sprint and you could step up to a good LTE phone.
Also, the white version hits sprint early next month. Might be worth waiting a week or two to see if the white version is your cup of tea.

Yeah Evo 3D screen had washed out colors and horrific viewing angles. People praise super lcd for color accuracy but on the evo 3D certain colors weren't very accurate. The lime green on the ANdroid Market looked awful, using my laptop as a reference. I did love it for its sharp text and resolution for video playback.
My original plan was to get an iphone 4 due to resolution while also keeping my NExus S 4G and switching back and forth periodically. And then buy the SG S III since that's gonna probably have an HD screen with Super Amoled, not to mention spec'd like crazy. But if the 4" screen of my Nexus gets on my nerves, the 3.5" on the iphone and looking at an app drawer all day would drive me crazy.
Epic Touch it is, im curious about the white one. I imagine it will look super slick. The white skyrocket is beautiful, im just worried that getting in white would be a bit girly.

HTC evo 4g lte vs GS2 e4gt

This is not a real review just an honest one from a real person cause i feel most of the time these phone makers pay these companies to make the phones just seem better during reviews like when iphones always get the better reviews on every much better android phone its only what i and 7 of my friends think that jumped boat from the gs2 e4gt feel about the new evo and i don't expect anyone but the gs2 e4gt owners to understand this:
Screen:
*CONS-I really like both of these phones but when i got my evo yesterday and compared it to my gs2 on youtube videos and pics i could not help but to notice that the gs2 still has much better colors and just looks better period i still like the evo screen until i see them side by side then the evo looks as if its color has been washed or faded.in my option the gs2 e4gt wins hands down but i still like the evo,i tried different brightnesses as well but still so so.
*PROS-The evo has a much sharper picture due to being HD and all but not always noticeable.
Camera:
*CONS-i have seen so many reviews and commercials on how this camera is so great not the case im not trying to be the one to spoil this but if you came from the gs2 e4gt you would notice it right away,i used my micro sd from my last phone and seen some of my older pics from the gs2 e4gt and they look amazing and then i took at least 20 pics with all types of high settings and lighting and these pics are grainy and just not as good when compared hands down.
*PROS-This camera i has pretty good quality for the speed it takes the photos in.
Overall Phone ui:
*CONS-None so far
*PROS-The ui is clean and fluid much more than the gs2 e4gt because it was real zippy but never fluid so the evo wins this.

Dude Evo LTE beats the GS2 in every department. Your also comparing last years flagship phone to a 2012 flagship phone. The only con I'd say would be the bootloader.

e4gt bettar

Every phones better in its own ways.. Also this depends on each person preferences..
Even flip phones can be better lol.. You can throw one of them damn things against a wall and get a chip or two.. You'd need an expensive case on ours to not shatter the screen or something.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

phatmanxxl said:
Dude Evo LTE beats the GS2 in every department. Your also comparing last years flagship phone to a 2012 flagship phone. The only con I'd say would be the bootloader.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the SGS2 still looks better than the Evo. And saturated colors on the E4GT are much more enjoyable to me. From everything I have seen comparing the screen of the Evo to the int'l SGS2 and the SGS3, I can say I much prefer saturation over "accurate colors". The SGS3 screen also looks sharper than the Evo's. Not to mention, holding the E4GT at a normal distance still leaves me unable to see pixels. Until I hold it closer, like 6 inches away, I can't see them.
You really can't say the Evo beats the SGS2 in every department. Your grammar doesn't lend any credibility to your statement either.
And for last year's flagship, the E4GT is still an amazing phone. The only ones that "beat" it are the One X and the SGS3, and they have yet to be widespread. I personally can't wait for the SGS3. The screen looks amazing, and that Exynos shreds everything in its path. Hopefully Sprint or AT&T come out with a sexier version.

I think you should get a replacement for your new EVO, your screen is defective. I have a E4GT and an iPhone 4s, buddy just got a HTC One X...You can't even put them in the same ball park. Seriously it looks like those paint on displays they put on phones at radio shack. Everything is so bright, crisp and clear it almost looks like the icons are above the glass. Best display I have ever seen on a phone hands down and pretty much every Android or technology review site agree (pocketnow Engadget slashvear theverge ect ect). S4 is vastly superior soc, VASTLY. Im sorry Im not trying to be a jerk but you might be a fanboy if...you get the rest.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA

If this is only about specs, then the new Evo definitely has our E4GT beat. Then again, what do you expect? Our Phone is significantly older than the new Evo. If the Evo wasn't beating old tech from last year, that'd be cause for serious concern.
My Wife Got her Evo in yesterday. I like it. I specifically like the screen size and that it is specifically a HD Screen.
Personally though, I would rather Touchwiz over Sense any day. For how lightweight the new sense is, I noticed a small amount of lag on occasion. It wasn't a significant issue, but enough to notice and think "I guess it is not as fast as they make it sound."
My biggest gripe though has to be that the USB/Charging port is on the wrong side if you are to using the kick stand! What were they thinking?
Besides that I really like how it feels in the hand and it seems significantly easier for me to type with. Although if it were dropped I definitely foresee dinging the nice metal that lines the perimeter.
That's just my initial impressions from playing with it for about an hour.

The kickstand can support the phone on either side in portrait mode. Flip it over.

I like this new evo but after coming from the gs2 i feel like my new evos screen has no soul and colors look so blan,someone would have to pay me to say this screen is better than the gs2 screen.

manny1983nyc said:
I like this new evo but after coming from the gs2 i feel like my new evos screen has no soul and colors look so blan,someone would have to pay me to say this screen is better than the gs2 screen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol no one needs to b/c everyone already says and agrees it is
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA

Agreed evo lte screen sucks compared to e4gt.
Source: i haz one
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

T.C.P said:
Agreed evo lte screen sucks compared to e4gt.
Source: i haz one
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rofl hilarious
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

My main prob W/the new evo iiiiis. It's an HTC.. NUFF SAID. I'M OUT.

phatmanxxl said:
Dude Evo LTE beats the GS2 in every department. Your also comparing last years flagship phone to a 2012 flagship phone. The only con I'd say would be the bootloader.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not the graphics
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

I won't be getting lte phone until I get lte in my area
Sent from my GS2 the next big thing

I couldn't find the evo LTE, but I saw the lg nitro HD with the IPS screen yesterday. The screen is nice. The pre loaded HD video content was unreal. Looked so good it looked fake, too good to be true. You can see the detail on the smallest of objects. But outside of that, it really lacks contrast and blacks. Overall makes the screen have no advantage over samoled.
How often are you going to watch highly optimized ultra HD content?
______
-1988 Mustang GT hatch
Trick Flow Specialties Stage 1 cam, Mac long tube headers, Mac prochamber, Spintech super pro street mufflers, gt40p heads/intake, Crane beehive springs, hardened pushrods, underdrive pulleys, no smog, electric fan, 70maf sensor, bbk 70mm throttle body, Hotchkis suspension CC plates, welded subframe connectors, dual friction clutch, 3.73 gears positraction, freezing cold AC

yokken said:
I think the SGS2 still looks better than the Evo. And saturated colors on the E4GT are much more enjoyable to me. From everything I have seen comparing the screen of the Evo to the int'l SGS2 and the SGS3, I can say I much prefer saturation over "accurate colors". The SGS3 screen also looks sharper than the Evo's. Not to mention, holding the E4GT at a normal distance still leaves me unable to see pixels. Until I hold it closer, like 6 inches away, I can't see them.
You really can't say the Evo beats the SGS2 in every department. Your grammar doesn't lend any credibility to your statement either.
And for last year's flagship, the E4GT is still an amazing phone. The only ones that "beat" it are the One X and the SGS3, and they have yet to be widespread. I personally can't wait for the SGS3. The screen looks amazing, and that Exynos shreds everything in its path. Hopefully Sprint or AT&T come out with a sexier version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK thanks I'll work on my grammar to add more credibility to my point. I didn't think we still had Grammar Nazis on XDA. The first thing I noticed when I first saw the one X was how much sharper the screen looks, my GN beats the ET4g screen hands down also. These phones made me realize how low resolution the Epic Touch screen really is. Also, you CAN still see the difference with the phones two feet from your face, its that obvious. I'm not talking about looking for pixels with a magnifying glass.
Oh and by the way, since I had my replacement phone for the past three months it already has discoloration where the status bar is. I took special care because the last phone had screen burn in as well. That doesn't sound like a superior screen to me. I was quite disappointed in that.
I do agree the S3 will kill the Evo LTE once its released.
---------- Post added at 12:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:24 PM ----------
.
T.C.P said:
Agreed evo lte screen sucks compared to e4gt.
Source: i haz one
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My friend has a One X, and yes the One X screen kills the ET4G. You cant hold both phones side by side and seriously tell me the Evo One will not have a better screen over the Epic Touch.
I haven't seen any lag either, trust me I'm one to notice lag and imperfections. I ditched the 3D because of the crooked screen and photon because of the lag. Y'all need to get your head out of your asses.

I took a Gnex and compared my epic to it, not much screen difference I liked my screen better even with brightness up on the nexus. However the One X just murdered my screen hands down, made me wanna switch to AT&T
Truthfully I even found at times my photon killed my epic's screen, I miss pentile and my photon. I couldn't see the pixels unless I facepalmed my phone lol
That being said everyone sees colours differently so its all in the eye of the beholder.

If you look at the galaxy s vs the s2,that was a huge generational leap. Going from the s2 to the evo or s3 will be much more incremental in my opinion.
After seeing what 2012 will hold for new high end phones I bought this epic touch off contract. I came from an og epic and this thing has a significantly better screen, is literally half as thick, WAY faster ui, much improved camera, etc. I just don't see this year's phones as killing the epic touch.
This way, when the next nexus or whatever killer phone comes out I'll be off contract and ready to go.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA

phatmanxxl said:
OK thanks I'll work on my grammar to add more credibility to my point. I didn't think we still had Grammar Nazis on XDA. The first thing I noticed when I first saw the one X was how much sharper the screen looks, my GN beats the ET4g screen hands down also. These phones made me realize how low resolution the Epic Touch screen really is. Also, you CAN still see the difference with the phones two feet from your face, its that obvious. I'm not talking about looking for pixels with a magnifying glass.
Oh and by the way, since I had my replacement phone for the past three months it already has discoloration where the status bar is. I took special care because the last phone had screen burn in as well. That doesn't sound like a superior screen to me. I was quite disappointed in that.
I do agree the S3 will kill the Evo LTE once its released.
---------- Post added at 12:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:24 PM ----------
.
My friend has a One X, and yes the One X screen kills the ET4G. You cant hold both phones side by side and seriously tell me the Evo One will not have a better screen over the Epic Touch.
I haven't seen any lag either, trust me I'm one to notice lag and imperfections. I ditched the 3D because of the crooked screen and photon because of the lag. Y'all need to get your head out of your asses.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed, not sure what these peeps are smoking lolz