Hello all, I was testing the speeds of these roms using only the AnTuTu Benchmark v2.1 program just for myself. I figured I'd post them in the case that anyone was interested. These tests were done from scratch with an average microSD card.
Elelinux-6.2.0-Hero-Speedmachine-v4 (2011-05-28)
Android: 2.2
RAM: 77
CPU Int: 178
CPU float: 14
2D: 291
3D: 302
IO: 55
SD write: 81
SD read: 183
Score: 1181
CPU freq: 576 MHz
Elelinux-6.2.0-Hero-Speedmachine-v4 (2011-05-28)
Android: 2.2
RAM: 97
CPU Int: 232
CPU float: 19
2D: 290
3D: 325
IO: 65
SD write: 74
SD read: 183
Score: 1285
CPU freq: 710 MHz
Elelinux-7.1.0-RC1-Hero-v3.1 Android 2.3.5 (2011-07-25)
Android: 2.3.5
RAM: 114
CPU Int: 232
CPU float: 19
2D: 286
3D: 301
IO: 60
SD write: 88
SD read: 168
Score: 1268
CPU freq: 710 MHz
[12 MAR] VillainROM v13.0 Release * WWE * Android 2.1 *
RAM: 78
CPU Int: 181
CPU float: 15
2D: 304
3D: 297
IO: 50
SD write: 105
SD read: 167
Score: 1197
CPU freq: 576 MHz
[12 MAR] VillainROM v13.0 Release * WWE * Android 2.1 *
RAM: 97
CPU Int: 227
CPU float: 19
2D: 314
3D: 306
IO: 60
SD write: 79
SD read: 161
Score: 1263
CPU freq: 710 MHz
cool. doesn't explain why screen updates in some UI animations are still slower in gb... maybe overlay speed drawing or blob moving isn't checked in that testing app.
but still, very cool info and exciting to see how gb is speeding things up in many areas compared to 2.2.
sense has always had some different ways of doing things with different results across the board so I'm not surprised at vr's score.
sadly, the way that sd speeds fluctuate between tests shows that the sd speed can't be relied upon in this testing app and should be disregarded. unfortunately it also affects the total score...
I'm guessing higher values represent better performance?
Yeah, higher = better
but it's not good to set CPU OC to 710MHz....
I'm 614MHz now.
I thought the maximum you could safely overclock is 710, have had this as my Max for ages, no problems with battery etc
Sent from my HTC Hero using XDA App
max safe freq is 768+ if your device can handle it. Not all can though, mine can only run 729 stable.
it will be cool if u added salsasense benchmarks
kaizvn said:
but it's not good to set CPU OC to 710MHz....
I'm 614MHz now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm at 710mhz 24/24 for about a year now....
Hero Cronos Ginger X 2.3.3
Android 2.3.5
RAM: 114
CPU Int: 225
CPU float: 19
2D: 293
3D: 284
IO: 65
SD write: 81
SD read: 138
Score: 1219
CPU freq: 710 MHz
P.S. SD Card Patriot 16Gb Class 10.
Hi all
I saw that no one put a benchmark with salsa , so i made one with AnTuTu v2.3.1 .
[ROM][Sense 2.3.3] SalsaSense 4.0 - GB Sense is fast?
Android 2.3.3
Ram : 81
CPU integer: 189
CPU float-point :16
2D : 146
3D : 272
Database IO : 60
SD write : 22
SD read : 87
Score : 873
CPU frequency: 633
I don't made any overclock . Maybe that's why is the score so low . Or maybe its sense ?
[ROM]Elelinux-7.1.0-RC1-Hero-v3.5 Android 2.3.7
Ram : 97
CPU integer: 197
CPU float-point :17
2D : 289
3D : 296
Database IO : 55
SD write : 87
SD read : 170
Score : 1208
CPU frequency: 633
my own test
Elelinux 7.1.0 RC1 3.3 (2.3.5)
these are my 3 test
ram 82 103 108
cpu integer 178 217 220
cpu float 15 19 19
2d 146 292 289
3d 282 269 296
db io 50 55 60
sd wr 61 62 78
sd rd 170 167 155
total 984 1184 1225
frec 576 710 710
min frec 245
Elelinux 7.1.0 RC1 v3.2 light (2.3.5)
Kernel Las Venturas 0.5.0+
Ram : 103
CPU integer: 214
CPU float-point :19
2D : 289
3D : 283
Database IO : 55
SD write : 54
SD read : 155
Score : 1172
CPU frequency: 729 Mhz
Related
Post your results here!
DVP:
CPU time 21470 ms
CPU Sequential: 10900 ms
CPU Parallel: 10570 ms
Data:
time:20665 ms
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 2.45 MB/s
GPU:
Frames: 688
avg: 23 FPS
Samsung Focus:
CPU time: 21392 ms
CPU Sequential: 10900 ms
CPU Parallel: 10492 ms
Data:
time:15644 ms
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 3.27 MB/s
GPU:
Frames: 681
avg: 22 FPS
What's yours look like? Template below!
CPU time XXXXX ms
CPU Sequential: XXXXX ms
CPU Parallel: XXXXX ms
Data:
time:XXXXX ms
memory: XXXXX MB/s
storage: XXXXX MB/s
GPU:
Frames: XXXXX
avg: XXXXX FPS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Omnia 7 - Orange UK - Running NoDo and JJ6 Firmware.
CPU time 21417 ms
CPU Sequential: 10914 ms
CPU Parallel: 10503 ms
Data:
time:11130 ms
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 5.6 MB/s
GPU:
Frames: 680
avg: 22 FPS
That graphic test is a bit psychedelic!
CPU time 21437 ms
CPU Sequential: 10900 ms
CPU Parallel: 10537 ms
Data:
time:19176 ms
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 2.61 MB/s
GPU:
Frames: 687
avg: 23 FPS
AT&T Samsung Foucs NoDo
sifon187 said:
CPU time 21437 ms
CPU Sequential: 10900 ms
CPU Parallel: 10537 ms
Data:
time:19176 ms
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 2.61 MB/s
GPU:
Frames: 687
avg: 23 FPS
AT&T Samsung Foucs NoDo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
any external memory card there? That's very low storage transfers for a nand device...
LG Optimus 7 E900h [NoDo]
Average of 13 tests:
CPU time 21424 ms
CPU Sequential: 11018 ms
CPU Parallel: 10545 ms
Data:
time:15165 ms
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 3.07 MB/s
Storage had the biggest deviation: lowest was 0.13, while highest was 3.80...very odd.
GPU:
Frames: 668
avg: 22 FPS
HTC Arrive on Sprint
CPU Time: 21401ms
Sequential: 10972ms
parallel: 10429ms
Data time: 19190ms
memory:13.07MB/s
storage: 2.61MB/s
GPU:
695 frames
avg: 23fps
So, uh, what does all this mean?
Debranded Omnia 7 running NoDo
In flight mode to prevent network access:
CPU time 21375 ms
CPU Sequential: 10896ms
CPU Parallel: 10479ms
Data:
time:11202ms
memory: 13.07MB/s
storage: 5.6MB/s
GPU:
Frames: 682
avg: 22FPS
HTC Arrive
CPU time 21370 ms
CPU Sequential: 10926 ms
CPU Parallel: 10444 ms
Data:
time:15808 ms
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 3.27 MB/s
GPU:
Frames: 692
avg: 23 FPS
Nodo Samsung Focus
CPU time 21390 ms
CPU Sequential: 10913 ms
CPU Parallel: 10477 ms
Data:
time:17472 ms
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 3.02 MB/s (This was 3.2 the first time I ran the test)
GPU:
Frames: 683
avg: 22 FPS
I don't know how good of a test this is, since real world testing shows the Samsung Focus slightly faster than the HTC Arrive. So you can imagine my surprise when the HTC edged out the Samsung in each of these tests - specifically dealing with memory speeds.
HTC Arrive
CPU time: 21360 ms
CPU Sequential: 10893 ms
CPU Parallel: 10467 ms
Data:
time: 18203
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 2.8 MB/s
GPU:
Frames: 700
avg: 23 FPS
2nd time after turning off/on my phone and running wp bench
CPU time: 21303 ms
CPU Sequential: 10858 ms
CPU Parallel: 10445 ms
Data:
time: 15402
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 3.56 MB/s
GPU:
Frames: 698
avg: 23 FPS
Data storage times seems to deviate a bit for me. When I first ran the test, it was 2.6. Next time was above 5.
There's probably some caching involved that's affecting that benchmark.
Samsung Focus 7004
CPU time 21498 ms
CPU Sequential: 10974 ms
CPU Parallel: 10524 ms
Data:
time:13617 ms
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 4.36 MB/s
GPU:
Frames: 680
avg: 22 FPS
CPU time 24171 ms
CPU Sequential: 12814 ms
CPU Parallel: 11357 ms
Data:
time:16005 ms
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 3,27 MB/s
GPU:
Frames: 702
avg: 23 FPS
HTC 7 Trophy with NoDo
CPU time 21225 ms
CPU Sequential: 10861 ms
CPU Parallel: 10364 ms
Data:
time:19572 ms
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 2,8 MB/s
GPU:
Frames: 684
avg: 22 FPS
HTC HD7 with NoDo
z33dev33l said:
any external memory card there? That's very low storage transfers for a nand device...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Data:
time: 13736
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 3.92 MB/s
No memory card but I reran the data benchmark w/ airplane mode on, and got the above.
CPU time 24049 ms
CPU Sequential: 12753 ms
CPU Parallel: 11296 ms
Data: (5MB)
time:59566 ms
memory: 15,31 MB/s
storage: 5,83 MB/s
GPU:
Frames: 690
avg: 23 FPS
Samsung Omnia 7 NoDo
CPU time 21387 ms
CPU Sequential: 10900 ms
CPU Parallel: 10487 ms
Data: (5MB)
time:12671 ms
memory: 13,07 MB/s
storage: 5,06 MB/s
GPU:
Frames: 682
avg: 22 FPS
Samsung Omnia 7 NoDo
CPU time 21018 ms
CPU Sequential: 10933 ms
CPU Parallel: 10085 ms
Data:
time:16882 ms
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 3.98 MB/s
GPU:
Frames: 670
avg: 22 FPS
I'm getting diminishing storange speed on my phone... At first it was 5MB/s-ish, after about 6 runs it's 0.16MB/s now.
Samsung Focus on 7390
CPU time 21912 ms
CPU Sequential: 11016 ms
CPU Parallel: 10896 ms
Data:
time:18112 ms
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: Originally 4.2, now 2.8 MB/s
GPU:
Frames: 681
avg: 22 FPS
CPU time 21394 ms
CPU Sequential: 10938 ms
CPU Parallel: 10456 ms
Data:
time:14425 ms
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 3.92 MB/s
GPU:
Frames: 684
avg: 22 FPS
LG Optimus 7 with NoDo update.
CPU time 21393 ms
CPU Sequential: 10974 ms
CPU Parallel: 10419 ms
Data:
time: 20100ms
memory: 13.07 MB/s
storage: 2.45 MB/s
GPU:
Frames: 654
avg: 22 FPS
tmos hd7 with nodo
Dear Folks,
I'm inquisitive to your phone details and your score on AnTuTu Benchmark stuff.
I look for the fastest ROM for the Defy.
As i have seen, people has much better scores than me! They have arround 3500! How is it possible?
What is your score
ROM: WajkIUI 1.12.02 ICS - MULTiLanguage + RTL Fix
CPU: 1350 Mhz
SD: Class10 16Gb
Score: 3214
User: qsmyle
ROM: CyanogenMod 7.2 Nightly
CPU: ? Mhz
SD: ?
Score: 3200
User: nogoodusername
ROM: CyanogenMod 7.2 Nightly by Jordan
CPU: 1200 Mhz
SD: Class10 16Gb
Score: 2914
User: qsmyle
ROM: WajkIUI 1.12.02 ICS - MULTiLanguage + RTL Fix
CPU: 1200 Mhz
SD: Class10 16Gb
Score: 2821
User: qsmyle
ROM: MS2Ginger (07.12.2011) Android 2.3.4 (6)
CPU: 1200 Mhz
SD: Class4 8Gb
Score: 2734
User: NITRO_100
ROM: CyanogenMod 7.1.0 (Android 2.3.7)
CPU: 1000 Mhz
SD: Class4 16Gb
Score: 2608
User: Evil Slayer
ROM: CyanogenMod 7.1.0 (Android 2.3.7)
CPU: 1200 Mhz
SD: Class10 16Gb
Score: 2600
User: qsmyle
I post here only the significant scores. You can browse others in the whole thread. I'm glad for your assistance.
qsmyle said:
Dear Folks,
I'm inquisitive to your phone details and your score on AnTuTu Benchmark stuff.
I look for the fastest ROM for the Defy.
As i have seen, people has much better scores than me! They have arround 3500! How is it possible?
What is your score?
ROM: WajkIUI 1.12.02 ICS - MULTiLanguage + RTL Fix
CPU: 1200 Mhz
SD: Class10 16Gb
Score: 2821
User: qsmyle
ROM: MS2Ginger (07.12.2011) Android 2.3.4 (6)
CPU: 1200 Mhz
SD: Class10 16Gb
Score: 2731
User: qsmyle
ROM: CyanogenMod 7.1.0 (Android 2.3.7)
CPU: 1200 Mhz
SD: Class10 16Gb
Score: 2600
User: qsmyle
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow...That's Weird...i thought the cm7 is the fastest rom
may i ask you a question?do you think that the WajkIUI is the best rom for gaming and is it the fastest??i asked that since it has the best score of the 3 roms you tested
And My Test Results:
CM7 7.1.0
1Ghz CPU
Class 4 16GB SD Card
Score:
2481
EDIT: I did the test one more time right after the first one and i got 2608
and you are right...how the hell someone with 864mhz frequency got 3664 score(saw it from defy rankings in the app) and you and i got less scores?:S
Thank's your score. I bought my Defy two days ago. My previous droid was a Xperia X8. Thats why I don't know which ROM better for gaming. I hope we will got more answeres.
I get 3200 on cm7
Sent from my MB526 using xda premium
nogoodusername said:
I get 3200 on cm7
Sent from my MB526 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is your base ROM (SBF)? Is it Froyo 2.2? Could you share your ROM with us? Where can I download this nightly build?
MS2Ginger2.1, 1200 MHz, SD 8 gb class4, score 2734
2400
~2400 using a class 4 card and CM 7.1 @ 1 GHz. Haven't bothered with 1.3 GHz, as it overheats to 40+ deg C and is not really ideal.
I've installed ICS now, can't wait to try all the benchmark apps on it Will upload pics n stats when I'm done.
AnTuTu Benchmark - not working in ICS 09-dec
I get FC in latest build ..
MS2Ginger 3.0 (05.02.2012), 1000MHz, Class4 16GB, highest score 2490, lowest score 2357.
---------- Post added at 02:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:49 PM ----------
MS2Ginger 3.0 (05.02.2012), 1300MHz, Class4 16GB, highest score 2902, lowest score 2834.
2964 in CM 7 stable at 1200 mhz.
Sent from my MB525 using xda premium
ROM: MS2Ginger 3.0 (05.02.2012.) Android 2.3.4 (6)
CPU: 1000 MHz
SD: Transcend Class 4, 32Gb
Score: 2489
EDIT:
ROM: MS2Ginger 2.1
CPU: 1100 MHz
SD: Transcend Class 4, 32Gb
Score: 2603
My score using cm7.2.0.rco. kang
ROM: ICSMiuiDSJ 2.2.10
CPU: 1100 Mhz
SD: Class10 16Gb
Score: 2777
User: MrNiick
mystats, i had 8% of battery, don't know if that changes something :S
ROMs tested on my Defy:
ICS 1.12.16 > Score = 2100 @ 1.2 Ghz Battery temp hovers around 39 - 44 deg C
CM 7.1 RC Jordan > Score = 2200 @ 1Ghz Battery temp hovers around 39 - 44 deg C
Pikachu Edition > Score = 1980 @ 1 Ghz Battery temp under 40
Wakj 2.1.20 > Score = 18?? @ 1 Ghz Battery temp under 41
BTW - All the above using Quadrant Standard
3286 on cm9
ROM: CM7.2 20120127 Android 2.3.7
CPU: 1200 MHz
SD: Samsung class 10, 16Gb
Score: 3126
Sent from my MB526 using XDA App
ROM: Kang CM7.2 Cherry Picks
CPU: 1000 Mhz
SD: Class 10 Lexar 32Gb
Score: 2652
User: Searcher3
Doesn't look too hot!! The SD card write was bad at 2.6MB/s but read was okay at 15.6MB/s. It's the only ROM I've tried so far though.
A slight improvement on these older ROMs
ROM: Mokee 43.1
CPU: 1200Mhz
GPU: 266Mhz
SD card: Lexar Class 10 16Gb
Score: 5089
Some guys on Antutu are getting 10000+. I thought I was doing well - how the hell do they do it?!
Sent from my MB525 using Xda app
ROM: CyanogenMod 11
CPU: 1300 Mhz
SD: 8GB Class 4
Score: 5689
User: andreypiekas
This is a very cheap 5” Chinese Android tablet made especially for GPS-navigation purposes.
Here are the characteristics:
CPU: 60.0 - 1008.0 MHz ARMv7 VFPV3, NEON (sun5i)
RAM: 337.4 MB
ROM: 503.9
GPU: Mali-400 MP (OpenGL ES 2.0)
Internal storage: 6 GB
External micro SD-card: max. 32 GB
Capacitive 5-touch screen 5”
Screen resolution: 800×432
WiFi 802.11 b/g/n
Built-in GPS
Battery: 1400mA, 3.7V
Connectors: mini USB charger, micro SD-card, earphone
Operating system: Android 4.0.4
Build number: nuclear_jtda311-eng 4.0.4 JTDA311V1.0 20121220 test-keys
Kernel: Linux version 3.0.8+ ([email protected]) gcc version 4.5.1 (Sourcery G++ Lite 2010.09-50) #64 PREEMPT Thu Dec 13 13:36 CST 2012
Antutu test results:
CPU: 828; GPU: 1752
Total scores: 3536
RAM: 551
I/O: 405
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For 78 dollars it would be a reasonable GPS-solution, however the time-to-first-fix (TFF) of satellites signals is quite long.
The main problem with this device is its poor firmware. The screen flickers, probably due to the wrongly set refresh rate.
I wonder whether I could improve this by setting new values in build.prop.
I donʼt hope that there is any firmware update for this device, but who knows...
Quadrant score of only 1271, while the average is 1861.
CPU: 3093 (average = 2377)
Mem: 735 (average = 1080)
I/O: 648 (average = 4305)
2D: 580 (average = 393)
3D: 1298 (average = 1283)
Available space of 268MB for internal storage and 1.02GB for external storage.
Different I/O schedulers don't have a huge effect on the score.
What is the cause of the low I/O?
About phone:
Android 4.1.2 custom ROM Jelly Time R30 (stable)
CPU overclocked to 1.6 ghz
Transcend 16 GB class 4 MicroSD card
So I did this benchmark using Quadrant Standard.
Quadrant score of only 1706
CPU: 2202
Mem: 1168
I/O: 3578
2D: 321
3D: 1260
About phone:
I'm on Mike's ARHD 7.2 *works like a charm*
CPU not overclocked.
Running on Sandisk 8GB Class4 MicroSD card
*Don't think its due to the external card though*
So I ran quadrant aswell.
ROM: 4.2.2 Jellytime R7 (latest as of this post)
CPU: oc'd 1.6ghz
and probably the cheapest 4GB mSD card laying around...
Score: 2503
CPU: 3402
Mem: 814
I/O: 6592
2D: 327
3D: 1281
It could be your I/O scheduler...? I'm on noop if that helps.
Like IceFlam21 said, i think the I/O isn't dependent on the external card. It's like internal memory.
Scanlia said:
So I ran quadrant aswell.
ROM: 4.2.2 Jellytime R7 (latest as of this post)
CPU: oc'd 1.6ghz
and probably the cheapest 4GB mSD card laying around...
Score: 2503
CPU: 3402
Mem: 814
I/O: 6592
2D: 327
3D: 1281
It could be your I/O scheduler...? I'm on noop if that helps.
Like IceFlam21 said, i think the I/O isn't dependent on the external card. It's like internal memory.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tried different I/O schedulers, it seems that Deadline gives the highest score at 1314. Still very low though
My suggestion would be to take a quick nandroid of your phone, or, actually, just back up everything with titanium bkp, and then install the latest version of your ROM, R7, and see how that changes the results.
IO score seems to vary
Whats odd is that my IO score seems to vary hugely. I ran it 1st time and got 1800, then ran again and got 5760.
I seem to have problems with a low memory score
What I have is
Sabsa Prime V15 (android 4.0.4, sense 4.1) overclocked to 1.5gh.
Some of the scores are very promising
CPU 3002 (way above average but them I am overclocked)
3D 1653 (way above average)
2D 825 (more than double the average).
IO 2000-5700 depending on whats happening when I run it (? background processes slowing it down).
And oh dear
Memory 661 (way below average)
It does seem I'm short of RAM, sometimes it'll take 20 seconds to load the messaging app, other times less than 2!
Did a full wipe and installed Jelly Time 4.2 R7. Quadrant score is now 2805 :victory:
CPU: 3331
Mem: 1085
I/O: 7623
2D: 654
3D: 1331
About phone:
Android 4.2.2 custom ROM Jelly Time R7
CPU overclocked to 1.5 ghz, governor on 'aggressive', scheduler on 'bfq'
Transcend 16 GB class 4 MicroSD card
I need help porting this rom Samsung S7 Edge from Walton Primo GH6 to my device. :crying:
It has same kernel 3.18.19 with my device
Both running in stock Android 6.0
and same chipset Mediatek 6580 Processor
Please help me I really love the Touchwiz UI however i cannot afford to buy a Samsung phone so pls help me port it to my device :crying:
My Device Specs(Firefly Mobile Aurii Secret Lite)
SoC : MediaTek MT6580 Processor :ARM Cortex-A7, 1300 MHz, number of cores : 4
Graphics processor : ARM Mali-400 MP2, number of cores : 2
Main memory : 1 GB, 533 MHz
Internal memory : 8 GB Memory cards : microSD, microSDHC
Display : 5 in, IPS, 720 x 1280 pixels, 24 bit
Battery : 3450 mAh, Li-Polymer
Operating System : Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera : 3264 x 2448 pixels, 1280 x 720 pixels, 30 fps
SIM card : Micro SIM
Wi-Fi : B, g, n, Wi-Fi Hotspot USB 2.0, Micro USB
Bluetooth : 4.0 Localization / Navigation : GPS, A-GPS
The specs of the device i want to port(Walton Primo GH6)
SoC : MediaTek MT6580 Processor : ARM Cortex-A7, 1300 MHz, Number of cores : 4
Graphics processor : ARM Mali-400 MP2, Number of cores : 2
Main memory : 1 GB, 533 MHz Internal memory : 8 GB memory cards : microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC
Display : 5 in, IPS, 720 x 1280 pixels, 24-bit
Battery : 2000 mAh, Li-Ion
Operating system : Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera : 3264 x 2448 pixels, 1280 x 720 pixels, 30 fps
SIM card : Micro-SIM, mini-SIM
Wi-Fi : b, g, n,Wi-Fi Hotspot USB 2.0, Micro USB
Bluetooth : 4.0 Localization / Navigation : GPS, A-GPS
Please I have put to effort in creating this thread I hope someone would help me :crying::crying::crying: