As many of you know the Samsung Galaxy S (Generation 1) family is growing larger and larger with new sub models variations with minor changes in either the screen from SAMOLED to SLCD or the way they are rooted, and or radio for different regions.
It will be in the best interest of everybody here in the forum to please TAG your messages Subject line with the model of your phone when you are posting a new message, in return that will get you quicker responses from other members that have the same phone model as you do.
Here's a list of the most popular models that are seen the most in this section of the forum:
[02B] = [SC-02B]
[i9000] = [GT-i9000]
[i9000b] = [GT-i9000B]
[i9000m] = [GT-i9000M]
[i9000t] = [GT-i9000T]
[i9003] = [GT-i9003SL]
[m240s] = [SHW-M240S]
other less common models in this section of the forum
[i9008] = [GT-i9008]
[i9088] = [GT-I9088]
[d700] = [SPH-D700]
[i897] = [SGH-I897]
[i500] = [SCH-i500]
[i896] = [SGH-I896]
[i909] = [SCH-I909]
[t959] = [SGH-T959]
[t959d] = [SGH-T959D]
[t959v] = [SGH-T959V]
Related
As many of you know the Samsung Galaxy S (Generation 1) family is growing larger and larger with new sub models variations with minor changes in either the screen from SAMOLED to SLCD or the way they are rooted, and or radio for different regions.
It will be in the best interest of everybody here in the forum to please TAG your messages Subject line with the model of your phone when you are posting a new message, in return that will get you quicker responses from other members that have the same phone model as you do.
Here's a list of the most popular models that are seen the most in this section of the forum:
[02B] = [SC-02B]
[i9000] = [GT-i9000]
[i9000b] = [GT-i9000B]
[i9000m] = [GT-i9000M]
[i9000t] = [GT-i9000T]
[i9003] = [GT-i9003SL]
[m240s] = [SHW-M240S]
other less common models in this section of the forum
[i9008] = [GT-i9008]
[i9088] = [GT-I9088]
[d700] = [SPH-D700]
[i897] = [SGH-I897]
[i500] = [SCH-i500]
[i896] = [SGH-I896]
[i909] = [SCH-I909]
[t959] = [SGH-T959]
[t959d] = [SGH-T959D]
[t959v] = [SGH-T959V]
Here are some images of the PCB inside the Galaxy Nexus Dock (Model EDD-D1F2BE)
Maybe someone finds them useful.
Note:
U9 is on the backside of the PCB
U6 on the backside connects the pogo-pins
U10 is an 8bit microcontroller whose inscription can't be read entirely.
According to the manufacturer's website it's one of three models.
CON3 on the parts-side of the PCB is not connected to anything.
This is a list of the parts I could identify:
Code:
PROXIMA_DESK DOCK_SPDIF
2011.12.02
REV1.0RF TECH
U2 - SSOP14
HDO4
1BK G4
A580
U4 - DFN8
B9E (or BSE)
209
5C7
U5 - QFN24
PULSUS
PSM702
G252 ??
U7, U8 - DFN10
BAI9
U9 - SOP10
0524P
U10 - SOIC16
??RERIVER (CORERIVER)
GC???10A0 (GC87C510A0, GC81C510A0, GC89C510A0)
SO??? J1145 (SO16IP)
O
GG80
144
JE8
Hi all, I need to buy with short supply only vodafone phone (20 € per month advance +49 = 649 €) the samsung galaxy note II LTE.
I would like some clarification before taking it so as not to throw money.
The price of 649 € is an adequate price for the Notes 2 lte?
It 'so much the difference between note II and S4 ? given the recent output and lower price with the current offer (S4 to advance 15 per month +99 = 549 €) say it is a mistake to take the notes II?
I would like to know if the note is easily rootabile on the stock rom, so without changing anything? Invalidates the warranty? there is a way to restore warranty?
However, there is a way to solve the hard brick (also a fee, do it yourself or jtag), or you may end up with a paperweight?
If anyone has had experience, how does the samsung pay to repair a hard brick without warranty?
Simply rooting the device there is a risk of brick it? You continue to receive updates even with root?
Sorry for the many questions, I would not create trouble but the price is quite high and it is a commitment for 30 months, I would like to know more to not regret it soon after.
Thanks in advance
- Worried of SDS/brick bug = S4
-Rooting = same.
-Features = note 2 ( spen beat S4 new features without doubt.
- Custom Rom of choices=S4
- Battery lasting performance= note2
- Camera= S4,
- Vibrant and vivid of screen = S4
- Larger screen= note2
- Hardware performance = S4
Summary: I love my note2 than any other phone. My next phone only will be Note 3. Not s4 , s5 or s6 and more....overall Note2 nothing to loose over S4.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
lee yun khong said:
- Worried of SDS/brick bug = S4
-Rooting = same.
-Features = note 2 ( spen beat S4 new features without doubt.
- Custom Rom of choices=S4
- Battery lasting performance= note2
- Camera= S4,
- Vibrant and vivid of screen = S4
- Larger screen= note2
- Hardware performance = S4
Summary: I love my note2 than any other phone. My next phone only will be Note 3. Not s4 , s5 or s6 and more....overall Note2 nothing to loose over S4.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hahahhah nice saying:laugh:
I'm looking to buy 8.4 inch tablet. From what I read, both are very good tablet. The difference of price here is about 70 AUD.
I don't really care about AMOLED vs LCD- both are fine.
I'll most probably run it on custom ROM. Tab Pro already has official CM support and established community. I'm not sure about Tab S, it's is too early to tell at this stage. I also notice Tab S is slightly thinner and lighter. Tab S runs on 3GB ram compared to 2GB of Tab Pro.
Probably you guys can give an opinion whether the price difference is worth it. Is there any other factor that makes one better than the other?
You have pretty much listed the differences, so it's just a matter of if you wish to save the $70.
Fingerprint scanner, thinner, lighter, AMOLED screen, extra Gb of Ram are the main differences.
If you plan to consume media, like watch TV/Movies/YouTube etc than the AMOLED screen is likely better for battery life, but if you mainly surf the web, than the LCD screen uses less battery.
As for CM11, the Tab Pro is only supported on the 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon version, technically the Exynos 5 Wifi version isn't supported officially.
The Tab S is currently getting a user made Exynos 5 version of CM11.
Good luck with you decision.
Freakstyler said:
You have pretty much listed the differences, so it's just a matter of if you wish to save the $70.
Fingerprint scanner, thinner, lighter, AMOLED screen, extra Gb of Ram are the main differences.
If you plan to consume media, like watch TV/Movies/YouTube etc than the AMOLED screen is likely better for battery life, but if you mainly surf the web, than the LCD screen uses less battery.
As for CM11, the Tab Pro is only supported on the 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon version, technically the Exynos 5 Wifi version isn't supported officially.
The Tab S is currently getting a user made Exynos 5 version of CM11.
Good luck with you decision.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which one can I make phone calls from the tablet itself? I know I will need the 4G version. But I heard a rumor that one of these you can use as an actual cell phone without sidesync
both got LTE version and can make call... how do i know? i owned both.
edan1979 said:
both got LTE version and can make call... how do i know? i owned both.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wonder if both have 1x antenna since United states (where I am) uses 1x to make voice calls. This is good info I will do more research.
Freakstyler said:
As for CM11, the Tab Pro is only supported on the 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon version, technically the Exynos 5 Wifi version isn't supported officially.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know how can I tell the difference (before I buy) between those two version? Do they have different version code? All I know is the one officially supported is the WiFi version
Does the Tab S 8.4 suffer from the same wifi singal issue as the Pro 8.4? If you hold the bottom left of tablet in portrait mode or bottom right in landscape mode, wifi signal drops down very low and may even disconnect.
I just got a Tab Pro 8.4 and it does this, there is a thread in that forum where many others have the same exact issues. If Tab S solves this problem that along may make it worth it.
Raistlin1 said:
Does the Tab S 8.4 suffer from the same wifi singal issue as the Pro 8.4? If you hold the bottom left of tablet in portrait mode or bottom right in landscape mode, wifi signal drops down very low and may even disconnect.
I just got a Tab Pro 8.4 and it does this, there is a thread in that forum where many others have the same exact issues. If Tab S solves this problem that along may make it worth it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had the pro 8.4 for a short while and I can confirm that the tab s 8.4 does not suffer with the same wifi problem. They have relocated the wifi antennae to a different part of the tab s.
Sent from my SM-T700 using Tapatalk
to me its simple. if i were a person that gets a new tablet every 6 months to 1 year then i get the whatever but if i am a person that is closer to 2+ years then i get the best i can afford at the time.
fletch33 said:
to me its simple. if i were a person that gets a new tablet every 6 months to 1 year then i get the whatever but if i am a person that is closer to 2+ years then i get the best i can afford at the time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thing is, no device absolutely best another
More expensive doesn't always mean better
I was leaning to Tab S but I'm reconsidering my decision upon hearing that Tab Pro 8.4 might get better dev support due to Qualcomm SOC.
Can anyone who have tried both device or @edan1979 give your opinion whether Tab S really feels better at hand? (smaller dimension & lighter). I cannot give Tab Pro 8.4 a try because it is not available on my local store (samsung decide not to sell it here).
Only LTE version of tab pro has the qualcomm SOC.
Orphee said:
Only LTE version of tab pro has the qualcomm SOC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had the non lte version of tab pro and mine had qualcomm soc.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Prokeke said:
The thing is, no device absolutely best another
More expensive doesn't always mean better
I was leaning to Tab S but I'm reconsidering my decision upon hearing that Tab Pro 8.4 might get better dev support due to Qualcomm SOC.
Can anyone who have tried both device or @edan1979 give your opinion whether Tab S really feels better at hand? (smaller dimension & lighter). I cannot give Tab Pro 8.4 a try because it is not available on my local store (samsung decide not to sell it here).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i agree and that is why i said "best i can afford" not most expensive.
i own the 10.1 Pro and 10.5 S because i bought the Pro when it came out and then m,ade the mistake of playing around with the Tab S. not surfe about the 8.4 but the overall feel, smoothness of OS, (big one here) USB port on side and not bottom, and 3GB ram made it a no brainer to move up to S and glad i did. so with 10.1 to 10.5 i dont regret the extra cash at all.
Prokeke said:
The thing is, no device absolutely best another
More expensive doesn't always mean better
I was leaning to Tab S but I'm reconsidering my decision upon hearing that Tab Pro 8.4 might get better dev support due to Qualcomm SOC.
Can anyone who have tried both device or @edan1979 give your opinion whether Tab S really feels better at hand? (smaller dimension & lighter). I cannot give Tab Pro 8.4 a try because it is not available on my local store (samsung decide not to sell it here).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does T705 (LTE version of tab s 8.4) have qualcom soc?
device info (samsung tab s 8.4 T705)
CCJ22 said:
Does T705 (LTE version of tab s 8.4) have qualcom soc?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this are the following info of my tab s 8.4 lte (T705)
Device information for samsung (SM-T705)
GENERAL INFORMATION
MANUFACTURER
samsung
MODEL
SM-T705
IMEI NUMBER
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PRODUCT
klimtltexx
HARDWARE INFORMATION
BOARD
universal5420
HARDWARE
universal5420
CPU_ABI
armeabi-v7a
CPU_ABI2
armeabi
ADVANCED CPU INFO
abi: armeabi-v7a
Processor : ARMv7 Processor rev 3 (v7l)
processor : 0
BogoMIPS : 1590.88
processor : 1
BogoMIPS : 1590.88
processor : 2
BogoMIPS : 1590.88
processor : 3
BogoMIPS : 1590.88
Features : swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp neon vfpv3 tls vfpv4 idiva idivt
CPU implementer : 0x41
CPU architecture: 7
CPU variant : 0x2
CPU part : 0xc0f
CPU revision : 3
Hardware : UNIVERSAL5420
Revision : 000a
Serial : 8c0f11b13204db12
STORAGE
External storage : 3,409MB / 11,834MB
OTHER INFO
Finger print : samsung/klimtltexx/klimtlte:4.4.2/KOT49H/T705XXU1ANF8:user/release-keys
Host : SWDD5909
Tags : release-keys
SOFTWARE INFORMATION
ANDROID VERSION NAME
KITKAT
ANDROID VERSION CODE
4.4.2
API LEVEL
19
BOOTLOADER
T705XXU1ANF8
ID
KOT49H
BUILD NUMBER
KOT49H.T705XXU1ANF8
NO OF INSTALLED APPS
355
NETWORK INFORMATION
NETWORK OPERATOR
I TIM
SIM OPERATOR
NETWORK TYPE
LTE
PHONE NUMBER
xxxxxxxxxxx
SIM SERIAL NUMBER
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
DISPLAY INFORMATION
SCREEN CLASS
X Large
SCREEN HEIGHT
2560 pixels
SCREEN WIDTH
1600 pixels
RESOLUTION
2560 * 1600
DENSITY CLASS
XHDPI
DENSITY (DPI)
320 dpi
BATTERY INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY
Li-ion
VOLTAGE
3755
TEMPERATURE
35° c
HEALTH
Good
CHARGING STATUS
Discharging
LAST CHARGING SOURCE
Usb
LEVEL
64
SENSORS INFORMATION
SENSORS
BMI055 Accelerometer Sensor
Type: TYPE_ACCELEROMETER
Vendor: Bosch Sensortec
Version: 1
Resolution: 0.038307227
Max Range: 19.6133
Power: 0.25
BMI055 Gyroscope Sensor
Type: TYPE_GYROSCOPE
Vendor: Bosch Sensortec
Version: 1
Resolution: 2.663161E-4
Max Range: 8.726646
Power: 6.1
AK09911C Magnetic field Sensor
Type: TYPE_MAGNETIC_FIELD
Vendor: Asahi Kasei Microdevices
Version: 1
Resolution: 0.06
Max Range: 2000.0
Power: 6.0
AK09911C Uncalibrated Magnetic field Sensor
Type: null
Vendor: Asahi Kasei Microdevices
Version: 1
Resolution: 0.06
Max Range: 2000.0
Power: 6.0
TMD3782 Proximity Sensor
Type: TYPE_PROXIMITY
Vendor: AMS, Inc.
Version: 1
Resolution: 8.0
Max Range: 8.0
Power: 0.75
TMD3782 Light Sensor
Type: TYPE_LIGHT
Vendor: AMS, Inc.
Version: 1
Resolution: 1.0
Max Range: 65535.0
Power: 0.75
SX9500 Grip Sensor
Type: null
Vendor: SEMTECH
Version: 1
Resolution: 5.0
Max Range: 5.0
Power: 0.75
Screen Orientation Sensor
Type: null
Vendor: Samsung Electronics
Version: 2
Resolution: 0.0
Max Range: 255.0
Power: 0.0
Rotation Vector Sensor
Type: TYPE_ROTATION_VECTOR
Vendor: AOSP
Version: 3
Resolution: 5.9604645E-8
Max Range: 1.0
Power: 12.35
Gravity Sensor
Type: TYPE_GRAVITY
Vendor: AOSP
Version: 3
Resolution: 0.038307227
Max Range: 19.6133
Power: 12.35
Linear Acceleration Sensor
Type: TYPE_LINEAR_ACCELERATION
Vendor: AOSP
Version: 3
Resolution: 0.038307227
Max Range: 19.6133
Power: 12.35
Game Rotation Vector Sensor
Type: null
Vendor: Samsung Electronics
Version: 3
Resolution: 5.9604645E-8
Max Range: 1.0
Power: 6.35
Uncalibrated Gyroscope Sensor
Type: null
Vendor: Samsung Electronics
Version: 1
Resolution: 2.663161E-4
Max Range: 8.726646
Power: 12.35
Orientation Sensor
Type: TYPE_ORIENTATION
Vendor: AOSP
Version: 1
Resolution: 0.00390625
Max Range: 360.0
Power: 12.35
Ah so ARMv7 / Exynos
Prokeke said:
The thing is, no device absolutely best another
More expensive doesn't always mean better
I was leaning to Tab S but I'm reconsidering my decision upon hearing that Tab Pro 8.4 might get better dev support due to Qualcomm SOC.
Can anyone who have tried both device or @edan1979 give your opinion whether Tab S really feels better at hand? (smaller dimension & lighter). I cannot give Tab Pro 8.4 a try because it is not available on my local store (samsung decide not to sell it here).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as for the support and my own development... yeah i love tab pro... lots of dev for it... in term of that device in general... it worth the money pay... it dont have that much different from tab s... and tab s... well this one... i got LTE exynos version but the screen blow me up since i miss my good old superamoled 7.7. sooner or later someone will take challenge to port cm or whatever to it... since i am more tw person so i dont really care... but tab s do feel better at hand... and i mostly bringing tab s with me.
Having recently purchased FYT type / 7862 - my experience here:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/teyes-cc3.4189041/post-85649157
Consider a Mekede/Navifly (FYT = 1 or FYT = 116)
I just brought two, having come from MTCD (JY and HA).
The Mekede/NAVIFLY (YIN) blows the MTCD PX5 I had out of the water
- Audio / True multiband EQ and DSP
- Screen quality/size
- Firmware quality
- Resume from power on consistency
- No MCU anomalies (such as loss of backing camera, or sudden loss of steering wheel controls)
- Factory Options built in that MTCD requires mods for (Adaptive volume, Backing lines configuration, and more)
- Bluetooth audio quality including calls
- OBD OBDLink LX paired instantly without fuss
- Ease of modifying / rooting / updating / recovering
- Competitive pricing
Above anything else, the audio quality is significantly better to my ears.
Note, I am NOT recommending the FYT reseller Teyes to those outside of Russia.
My opinion is a strong avoid (reseller) Teyes. Do not buy.
Update 3/10
Some additional experience;
Less buggy, fantastic audio, 4G built in, 5Ghz wifi, working BT, significantly snappier and doesn't require all of these mods and hacks (e.g. OBD) to just make things work.
Bonus is that If you want to mod/apply simple system changes, that can be done without root.
System / kernel updates without major refresh, no problem.
marchnz said:
Update 3/10
Some additional experience;
Less buggy, fantastic audio, 4G built in, 5Ghz wifi, working BT, significantly snappier and doesn't require all of these mods and hacks (e.g. OBD) to just make things work.
Bonus is that If you want to mod/apply simple system changes, that can be done without root.
System / kernel updates without major refresh, no problem.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello I’m in the US and looking to buy a new head unit, would you happen to know which seller uses these components
Plkyone said:
Hello I’m in the US and looking to buy a new head unit, would you happen to know which seller uses these components
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
The current list with thanks to 4pda/tyukhta
Ask seller for screenshot of system info to be sure. Also units of 3gb ram are OK.
FYT 116 (Mekede/Navifly) are popular. As are Joying.
List of manufacturer codes by serial number FYT (fytmanufacturer) and MCU
FYT = 0 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 0 JUNSUN
FYT = 1 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 1 MCU NOR Ekiy T900 T7, Isudar 72, NaviFly , MEKEDE , Funrover , XIMA XV6PRO
FYT = 15 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 15 (51); MCU KEQ EBILAEN
FYT = 31 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 31 MCU AYI IYING DATONG TECHNOLOGY ANTWING
FYT = 32 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 32
FYT = 43 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 43 MCU JY JOYING
FYT = 49 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 49 NONAME SMS
FYT = 51 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 51 MCU HYI ZWNAV Yulbro car multimedia Store
FYT = 53 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 53 MCU ZHAN WINCA FARCAR DAYSTAR UNISON
FYT = 62 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 62; MCU XHCN SINOSMART
FYT = 63 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 63 VAG
FYT = 94 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 94 VAG
FYT = 95 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 95 TEYES
FYT = 103 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 103 MCU YILT
FYT = 108 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 108 MCU CZY Idoing , ULLGO
FYT = 111 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 111 MEKEDE
FYT = 112 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 112 MCU YUF ATOTO
FYT = 116 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 116 MCU YIN = MEKEDE, NaviFly , Prelingcar YIN Runningway NIDYGR, Hengcheng, COHO YIN G23 6 * 128 Brand Name: YL
marchnz said:
Hi,
The current list with thanks to 4pda/tyukhta
Ask seller for screenshot of system info to be sure. Also units of 3gb ram are OK.
FYT 116 (Mekede/Navifly) are popular. As are Joying.
List of manufacturer codes by serial number FYT (fytmanufacturer) and MCU
FYT = 0 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 0 JUNSUN
FYT = 1 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 1 MCU NOR Ekiy T900 T7, Isudar 72, NaviFly , MEKEDE , Funrover , XIMA XV6PRO
FYT = 15 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 15 (51); MCU KEQ EBILAEN
FYT = 31 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 31 MCU AYI IYING DATONG TECHNOLOGY ANTWING
FYT = 32 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 32
FYT = 43 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 43 MCU JY JOYING
FYT = 49 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 49 NONAME SMS
FYT = 51 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 51 MCU HYI ZWNAV Yulbro car multimedia Store
FYT = 53 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 53 MCU ZHAN WINCA FARCAR DAYSTAR UNISON
FYT = 62 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 62; MCU XHCN SINOSMART
FYT = 63 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 63 VAG
FYT = 94 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 94 VAG
FYT = 95 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 95 TEYES
FYT = 103 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 103 MCU YILT
FYT = 108 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 108 MCU CZY Idoing , ULLGO
FYT = 111 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 111 MEKEDE
FYT = 112 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 112 MCU YUF ATOTO
FYT = 116 ro.build.fytmanufacturer = 116 MCU YIN = MEKEDE, NaviFly , Prelingcar YIN Runningway NIDYGR, Hengcheng, COHO YIN G23 6 * 128 Brand Name: YL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
I have been following some of your posts as I am very interested in buying a Joying unit using the UIS7862. I would like to use adaptive volume, is this functionality provided in the factory settings of every UIS7862 MCU or is it manufacturer specific? I am specifically asking for JY / Joying
Interesting. Both the Mekede and Navifly official stores have below average ratings while T'Eyes has above average. I've seen what you've said elsewhere about bugs and software lock in but I'd like to understand how this plays out in practice e.g. do either support loading of apps like vanced, how easy is it to mod the look of the interface (everything seems to be very purple these days and my wife hates purple ), is either platform hackable to support private cloud?