The HTC desire has a 1ghz single core processor and the LG optimus 2x has a 1ghz dual core processor, so I can assume that the HTC desire is as fast as the LG optimus 2x right?
sebastianlow said:
The HTC desire has a 1ghz single core processor and the LG optimus 2x has a 1ghz dual core processor, so I can assume that the HTC desire is as fast as the LG optimus 2x right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you where running a app that is only built for single core then yes, but the dual is 2x faster if it was using a app built for it.
Even with an app optimized for dual core it won't be twice as fast as the CPU isn't the only factor there. You have things like memory and storage speed etc.
philje123 said:
Even with an app optimized for dual core it won't be twice as fast as the CPU isn't the only factor there. You have things like memory and storage speed etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True i'll be waitting till 2012 for my next phone, Desire still going super strong
So if the HTC flyer is running an app that is dual core supported, then it will be running at 3ghz, am I right?
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
sebastianlow said:
So if the HTC flyer is running an app that is dual core supported, then it will be running at 3ghz, am I right?
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it'll be running at 1.5ghz on two cores.
Yea it might be hard to imagine, but o2x is definitely faster even though the clock speed is the same, but it still runs at 1gHz just on 2 processores at the same time.
the 2x is better in all specs
reaper7881 said:
the 2x is better in all specs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agreed...more cores means it can calculate faster....so apps will run smother on the dual core no matter what even if it was built for single core..think of it this way.cores equal horsepower..
sebastianlow said:
So if the HTC flyer is running an app that is dual core supported, then it will be running at 3ghz, am I right?
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flyer isn't dual core anyway it runs on the same CPU as the DHD but clocked at 1.5 Ghz
LG 2X is very bad apparently. LG havent taken the advantage of the dual core in the phone and it is quite laggy. It also doesnt have alot of RAM to back up the dual-core cpu
olyloh6696 said:
LG 2X is very bad apparently. LG havent taken the advantage of the dual core in the phone and it is quite laggy. It also doesnt have alot of RAM to back up the dual-core cpu
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since when exactly did LG become a major cellphone manufacturer capable of making a device on the technological edge
Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk
Related
Play or XL. Getting a bit bored of the PLAY now
The Sensation XL has a hideous design, its dpi is so low it reminds you of a low end phone, and it's got nothing over any dual core phone out there. Save your cash for something else, because HTC has put out a lot of garbage and underwhelming hardware in 2011.
The same CPU with different clock frequency
Get a windows phone or iphone. You wont see a massive difference by just switching to another android
nabgangsta said:
Play or XL. Getting a bit bored of the PLAY now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you liked the controller, just wait for another play to be released. Or wait for a quad core phone
tkkyobaby1 said:
The same CPU with different clock frequency
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Sensation has a Dual Core CPU and Adreno 220. We have Single Core CPU and Adreno 205.
Sent from my R800i using Tapatalk
3dvo
Sent from The Transcended M.U.G.E.N God!
sgs2
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
AndroHero said:
The Sensation has a Dual Core CPU and Adreno 220. We have Single Core CPU and Adreno 205.
Sent from my R800i using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
we are talking about the sensatio xl wich does not have dual core.
Sensation XL is 1.5ghz SINGLE CORE with Adreno 205.
so hes correct, its basically a bit higher clocked than the play and thats it.
as far as a few web searches is able to tell me anyways.
IE-coRe said:
we are talking about the sensatio xl wich does not have dual core.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry i thought all sensations were dual core
Mael5trom said:
Sensation XL is 1.5ghz SINGLE CORE with Adreno 205.
so hes correct, its basically a bit higher clocked than the play and thats it.
as far as a few web searches is able to tell me anyways.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my R800i using Tapatalk
that would indeed be the logical train of thought.... HTC didn't agree apparently...
So its PLAY all the way
Why do they even make single core anymore?
Sent from The Transcended M.U.G.E.N God!
Why do they make apartments and not only mansions?
Sent from my R800i using XDA App
KaoMinerva said:
Why do they even make single core anymore?
Sent from The Transcended M.U.G.E.N God!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even still, a lot of PC software doesn't have complete support for dual core (much less quad core) processors... Why would cellphone software be any better than PC software... ?
Sent from my R800x using Tapatalk
Marketing for your money.
paxChristos said:
Even still, a lot of PC software doesn't have complete support for dual core (much less quad core) processors... Why would cellphone software be any better than PC software... ?
Sent from my R800x using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so the XL only has a higher clock speed? Who cares?
Sent from The Transcended M.U.G.E.N God!
it s sensation xe not xl
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
I had a samsung galaxy s 2 dual core and now i have the htc one x quad core, but i can't see the difference in speed, is it normal ?
out of curiosity: does it lag on live wallpapers? can u try?
It's perfectly normal, and something I've been warning people about for a long time now. SG2 had a dual core 1.5 GHz processor, One X has a quad core 1.5 GHz processor. Having 2 more cores does not mean that the One X is twice as fast, just that it's twice as strong. There's a big difference.
Read all the way through this thread discussing the positive/negatives of dual core vs quad core processors. I spent a lot of time there trying to dispel a lot of the ignorance surrounding the science behind what makes a processor faster/stronger than the next.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1557803
HTC One X should be a beast...
galaxys said:
HTC One X should be a beast...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, the techno-illiterate keep spreading this myth that more cores equals faster speeds. It's just not true.
It can do more things at once versus a dual core CPU, but if it's at the same Cortex class and clocked to the same speed, it's not going to be any faster.
+1 watch the video of the galaxy nexus vs the one x phone arena did, it is embarrassing how awesome the nexus looks compared to the one x.
Honestly the dual core versions with the s4 are better performers for the reason stated, better cortex and smaller nm. It also means for better battery efficiency.
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium
sreza said:
It's perfectly normal, and something I've been warning people about for a long time now. SG2 had a dual core 1.5 GHz processor, One X has a quad core 1.5 GHz processor. Having 2 more cores does not mean that the One X is twice as fast, just that it's twice as strong. There's a big difference.
Read all the way through this thread discussing the positive/negatives of dual core vs quad core processors. I spent a lot of time there trying to dispel a lot of the ignorance surrounding the science behind what makes a processor faster/stronger than the next.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1557803
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just to knit pick a tad, the SGS2 (international, ATT, T-Mobile versions) had a 1.2GHz dual core where the Skyrocket variant had the 1.5GHz
Koizuma said:
Just to knit pick a tad, the SGS2 (international, ATT, T-Mobile versions) had a 1.2GHz dual core where the Skyrocket variant had the 1.5GHz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, I'd assumed OP had the skyrocket, else he might've noticed a slight speed increase.
I don't think the OP has EITHER phone. He's making so many post on which to buy , which means he hasn't got it? He's also saying he has a Sensation and XL... he has that many phones?
Sent from my HTC Desire S using xda premium
sreza said:
It's perfectly normal, and something I've been warning people about for a long time now. SG2 had a dual core 1.5 GHz processor, One X has a quad core 1.5 GHz processor. Having 2 more cores does not mean that the One X is twice as fast, just that it's twice as strong. There's a big difference.
Read all the way through this thread discussing the positive/negatives of dual core vs quad core processors. I spent a lot of time there trying to dispel a lot of the ignorance surrounding the science behind what makes a processor faster/stronger than the next.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1557803
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Much like PCs, the move from single to dual core showed immense promise. However, the move from dual to quad can appear very, very underwhelming.
You really have to have applications that are programmed for the architecture of your processor. Otherwise, the benefit is bragging rights, and even then, who wants to be that guy...
The gs2's touchwiz is just better built software. While not absent lag, it's the least laggy android skin.
I prefer Galaxy S II because it is more powerful in my option.
I never had a HTC phone but i think i'll take a shot some day!
z33dev33l said:
The gs2's touchwiz is just better built software. While not absent lag, it's the least laggy android skin.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry but that's just your opinion, my missus has the s2 and many a times it lags and touchwiz is a horrible skin, I prefer sense 4 anyday. But that's just my opinion.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
imheroldman said:
+1 watch the video of the galaxy nexus vs the one x phone arena did, it is embarrassing how awesome the nexus looks compared to the one x.
Honestly the dual core versions with the s4 are better performers for the reason stated, better cortex and smaller nm. It also means for better battery efficiency.
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm...the dual core variant kind of looks like **** here when compared to the One X tegra 3:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qR7zfXL_RdA&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium HD app
nebsif said:
out of curiosity: does it lag on live wallpapers? can u try?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The lag is due to sence and not the hardware, I'm using nova launcher and live wallpapers are fine.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
treebill said:
The lag is due to sence and not the hardware, I'm using nova launcher and live wallpapers are fine.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
'Sense' spell it right!
Sent from my HTC Desire S using xda premium
Also, live wallpapers need to be optimized. There can be a 25 core A15 at 5GHz and if the software does not fully support the capabilities of the CPU, it's gonna lag.
Needless to say Im beyond pissed off when i read this article. Now its actually confirmed true.
Source:
Sprint's Galaxy S3 Pops Up In User Agent Profile - Packs Dual-Core Processor and 16GB of Storage http://phandroid.com/?p=94271
Dual A15 hopefully.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
I think A9
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
From what I read the dual core s4 processor is almost as powerful if not equal. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Sent from my Galaxy S2 Epic Touch
newalker91 said:
You posted the article yet didnt read it?
It clearly stated that it's going to be the MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 processor. I'm ok with this. Everyone was bashing the A9 quad core to begin with.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ehh...I want a quadcore before i blow my upgrade. Going from Dual core to Dual Core seems like a waste.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
ReActiveDisorder said:
I think A9
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could have sworn that I heard it was going to be A15.
newalker91 said:
So you're saying that going from an AMD Athlon 64 X2 1.9ghz to an AMD Phenom II X2 3.2ghz would be a waste of money?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your comparing apples to oranges...Going from our Exynos Dual core to a snapdragon Dual core just doesnt warrant a upgrade.
Single 1ghz > Dual 1.2ghz= Upgrade
Dual 1.2ghz > Quad 1.4ghz= Upgrade
Dual 1.2ghz > Dual 1.5ghz= No way
Why blow the cash??? The SGS3 is basically just the SGS2 with a somewhat faster dual core processor. Somewhat better screen (Still a Pentile) and a bigger battery (300mah bigger). And a few new software pieces.
This is equivent to going from iPhone 4 to the iPhone 4S. Total waste.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
newalker91 said:
So you're saying that going from an AMD Athlon 64 X2 1.9ghz to an AMD Phenom II X2 3.2ghz would be a waste of money?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No need for another dual core versus quad core thread. Everyone knows the S4 kicks ass...it's just initial benchmarks for the quad core exynos seems to kick more ass, especially where gpu is concerned. I personally don't care if the phone has a dual core or quad core...but if it has a slower chip than its international siblings, then that's lame...
ReActiveDisorder said:
Your comparing apples to oranges...Going from our Exynos Dual core to a snapdragon Dual core just doesnt warrant a upgrade.
Single 1ghz > Dual 1.2ghz= Upgrade
Dual 1.2ghz > Quad 1.4ghz= Upgrade
Dual 1.2ghz > Dual 1.5ghz= No way
Why blow the cash??? The SGS3 is basically just the SGS2 with a somewhat faster dual core processor. Somewhat better screen (Still a Pentile) and a bigger battery (300mah bigger). And a few new software pieces.
This is equivent to going from iPhone 4 to the iPhone 4S. Total waste.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This has been hotly debated lately. Please read the linked article.
S4 vs Quadcore Why S4 is better
The only place where the quad core wins at is the gpu. The processors are about equal.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
ReActiveDisorder said:
Your comparing apples to oranges...Going from our Exynos Dual core to a snapdragon Dual core just doesnt warrant a upgrade.
Single 1ghz > Dual 1.2ghz= Upgrade
Dual 1.2ghz > Quad 1.4ghz= Upgrade
Dual 1.2ghz > Dual 1.5ghz= No way
Why blow the cash??? The SGS3 is basically just the SGS2 with a somewhat faster dual core processor. Somewhat better screen (Still a Pentile) and a bigger battery (300mah bigger). And a few new software pieces.
This is equivent to going from iPhone 4 to the iPhone 4S. Total waste.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're just looking at clock speeds. You're not really looking at the processors themselves.
I will take a15 anyday but is it exynos a15 with Mali 604 gpu.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 Beta-6
batting1000 said:
You're just looking at clock speeds. You're not really looking at the processors themselves.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly. The Qualcomm S4 MSM8960 supports newer and better technologies than the Exynos processors. Overall, all tasks and functions will be the latest version and faster than Exynos.
Here's a list:
BT 4.0
802.11a/b/g/n (2.4/5GHz)
GSM (GPRS, EDGE)
W-CDMA/UMTS (HSDPA, HSUPA, HSPA+, DC-HSPA+ cat.28)
MBMS
LTE cat.3
CDMA2000 (1xRTT, 1xEV-DO Rel.0/Rev.A/Rev.B, 1xEV-DO MC Rev.A)
TD-SCDMA
There's a reason people who render large files chose Intel processors over AMD. It's not just about cores and clocks.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
ReActiveDisorder said:
Your comparing apples to oranges...Going from our Exynos Dual core to a snapdragon Dual core just doesnt warrant a upgrade.
Single 1ghz > Dual 1.2ghz= Upgrade
Dual 1.2ghz > Quad 1.4ghz= Upgrade
Dual 1.2ghz > Dual 1.5ghz= No way
Why blow the cash??? The SGS3 is basically just the SGS2 with a somewhat faster dual core processor. Somewhat better screen (Still a Pentile) and a bigger battery (300mah bigger). And a few new software pieces.
This is equivent to going from iPhone 4 to the iPhone 4S. Total waste.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isnt the quad core supposed to save like 30 more battery?or something along those lines?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
I welcome this change, maybe the radios will be better and AGPS will actually perform worth a damn.
seems like another reason to jump back to HTC
With all this debate over why the sgs3 should be quad-core, I have one question..
What benefits would every day users see from the extra cores? How many people run lets say 12+ apps, switching between and using all of them?
I am personally happy with the sgs3 containing the s4. Quad core doesnt make the cpu the greatest. My Amd phenom x2 3.0 ghz beats out a number of quad cores.. I know its not a mobile cpu, but the same would apply to mobile phones. Quality over quantity.
blackroseMD1 said:
I could have sworn that I heard it was going to be A15.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was also suppose to have a 4.6 super amoled plus hd screen at 1280 x 1080 2.0 ghz quadcore lte equipped with a unicorn ='( I read the fake specs so many times lol well maybe other variants than sprint get snapdragon and we get A15? I can pray!
With the A15 architecture and a better display lets hope it runs smoother then the 3D did. Well of course it will.
For me it doesnt matter if we will have dc instead qc..but pentile must be replaced by superamoled hd plus..
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
What do you think? Which processor is better for HTC one X? Which has the better gpu?
Quad-core or Dual-core?
Post your opinions and comments and we'll see which one is better!
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
So far my tegra is blazing fast. Running everything with ease. Now I've never had anything with a Snapdragon s4 in it so I can't really compare.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk 2
Follow me @arquason
Yup, that's what I think as well, I have tegra3 and it's amazingly fast with it's four cores.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
HRandev said:
Yup, that's what I think as well, I have tegra3 and it's amazingly fast with it's four cores.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it will get better and better with the next updates, newer/better kernel etc.. I think the One X isn't on it's best yet, due to software/kernel/drivers etc..
When I just had my One X, I had a score of 5000 @ Quadrant, at 2.05 I had 5500, with 2.15 I get ~5800.. I think the One X will reach the 6000 points too (whitout custom overclocking)
and not every app is optimized for 4 cores..
Super-Veloce said:
I think it will get better and better with the next updates, newer/better kernel etc.. I think the One X isn't on it's best yet, due to software/kernel/drivers etc..
When I just had my One X, I had a score of 5000 @ Quadrant, at 2.05 I had 5500, with 2.15 I get ~5800.. I think the One X will reach the 6000 points too (whitout custom overclocking)
and not every app is optimized for 4 cores..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you look at the X vs XL quadrant benchmark than you can see the X beats the XL in CPU but the XL really beats the X in memory, the other ratings are more or less similar BUT most apps don't even make use of the 2 cores on the desktop let alone 4 on a phone. In the real world the XL is faster and much more energy efficient.
Android is optimized for dual core phones not yet quad core optimized. Probably key lime pie will be quad core ready. We have to wait to see awesomeness on tegra 3. HTC One S wins in some 3d/2d benchmarks because resolution is lower than one x not because of snapdragon s4 is much better than one x
Tegra has the advantage of having games written specifically for it. I doubt the S4 variant will get the same treatment.
huwwatkins said:
Tegra has the advantage of having games written specifically for it. I doubt the S4 variant will get the same treatment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not that I have tried it but with chainfire3d you can play tegra games on non tegra devices
I have owned both and in my experience the s4 variant is slightly smoother in basic ui navigation but gaming is subpar compared to tegra 3 variant. Imo the tegra version isnt used to its fullest due to lack of up to date kernel and driver optimizations so with the right update it should win in all aspects. Perhaps with 4.1 mainly due to the Nexus 7 using the same chipset and JB is optimized for it
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
hi i want to imited cpu frequency and core
exp: use single cpu core and limit it speed under 1GHZ
Root your phone AND look for set CPU in market ,u can adjust doped as you want but it may affect performance if you go very or very low
Sent from my Desire HD using xda premium
i want to set only single core use and 3other off all the time
x_zarbat said:
i want to set only single core use and 3other off all the time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well you can do that but it will have a major blow to the phone performance ,the phone would become very laggy or even useless
atrako1973 said:
well you can do that but it will have a major blow to the phone performance ,the phone would become very laggy or even useless
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually you can't force it to use only one of the main cores it will always use 2 you can force it to use the power save core but that will make your phone basically unusable.
There is an app called core control made by meltus which let's you turn off cores.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
atrako1973 said:
well you can do that but it will have a major blow to the phone performance ,the phone would become very laggy or even useless
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it wont, single core is enough for simple tasks, ofc im not talking about gamin or similar stuff
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Out of interest, why would you want to turn off 3 cores permanently?
fore use less power
x_zarbat said:
fore use less power
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why didn't you get another phone if that's the case?
Sent from my fauxed HOX running ViperX
feis said:
No it wont, single core is enough for simple tasks, ofc im not talking about gamin or similar stuff
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HTC like all other companies design their software around the hardware,so it was designed with a QUADCORE in mind, gaming or other ,and NO! SIMPLE TASKS WONT RUN SMOOTH BECAUSE IT WAS DESIGNED TO RUN ON QUADCORE AS WELL!
atrako1973 said:
HTC like all other companies design their software around the hardware,so it was designed with a QUADCORE in mind, gaming or other ,and NO! SIMPLE TASKS WONT RUN SMOOTH BECAUSE IT WAS DESIGNED TO RUN ON QUADCORE AS WELL!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah right, but somehow my desire hd with single core @ 1ghz runs sense 4 just fine.. i have disabled 2 cores in my hox and could even play every game i tried without problems. So please educate a bit more before making these statements in capital letters, thanks.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
feis said:
Yeah right, but somehow my desire hd with single core @ 1ghz runs sense 4 just fine.. i have disabled 2 cores in my hox and could even play every game i tried without problems. So please educate a bit more before making these statements in capital letters, thanks.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That may be the case, but One X is not designed to only run on one core, hence its probably gonna lag.
Sent from my fauxed HOX running ParanoidAndroid JB
Tingelholm said:
That may be the case, but One X is not designed to only run on one core, hence its probably gonna lag.
Sent from my fauxed HOX running ParanoidAndroid JB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont think "it isnt designed to" is good argument here. It isnt designed to run cyanogen mod or miui or whatever either, but somehow its doing just fine. It wasnt designed to record videos @ 30fps, but look, now it does, i could go on and on about things it "isnt designed" to do but it does Either way you cant run 1core for now, minimum 2, and as i said earlier im doing it right now and no lags, even games are smooth.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
feis said:
Yeah right, but somehow my desire hd with single core @ 1ghz runs sense 4 just fine.. i have disabled 2 cores in my hox and could even play every game i tried without problems. So please educate a bit more before making these statements in capital letters, thanks.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. I use two cores for gaming, simple tasks, and it doesn't lag at all. On Dead trigger, I'm getting 30-40 fps on two cores. The battery is much better when using 2 cores than 4 cores.
Sent from XDA App using HTC One X.
VaderSKN said:
Same here. I use two cores for gaming, simple tasks, and it doesn't lag at all. On Dead trigger, I'm getting 30-40 fps on two cores. The battery is much better when using 2 cores than 4 cores.
Sent from XDA App using HTC One X.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well then you bought a quadcore for nothing then ,you should have gone for a dual core since it works well for you,this phone makers so stupid making quadcore phones , wonder what was HTC thinking when they made the one x with quadcore ,they could have gone for dual core its cheaper
Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio Z715e using xda premium
I've choosen my hox for design, big and beautiful screen, great camera, great software AND it has a quad-core. I never choose a phone by its technical specs alone, so disabling 2 cores is not such a pity in my case.
Inviato dal mio HTC One X con Tapatalk 2
feis said:
I dont think "it isnt designed to" is good argument here. It isnt designed to run cyanogen mod or miui or whatever either, but somehow its doing just fine. It wasnt designed to record videos @ 30fps, but look, now it does, i could go on and on about things it "isnt designed" to do but it does Either way you cant run 1core for now, minimum 2, and as i said earlier im doing it right now and no lags, even games are smooth.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been a little behind with recent HOX development but, are you implying that there is a mod available that improves camera recording? Can you point me to it please? As to your reasoning behind the voluntary limiting of CPU frequency I entirely agree.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Feregorn said:
I've been a little behind with recent HOX development but, are you implying that there is a mod available that improves camera recording? Can you point me to it please? As to your reasoning behind the voluntary limiting of CPU frequency I entirely agree.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes there is, it's in the development section and it removes JPEG compression and increases video bit rate.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using Tapatalk 2
atrako1973 said:
Well then you bought a quadcore for nothing then ,you should have gone for a dual core since it works well for you,this phone makers so stupid making quadcore phones , wonder what was HTC thinking when they made the one x with quadcore ,they could have gone for dual core its cheaper
Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio Z715e using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didnt buy hox just because its quad core, if u did, thats funny. And just because i turned off 2 cores now, doesnt mean i cant turn 2 back on when i need the power boost. It litterally takes 5 seconds. Answering to other queation, yes, there is such mod in development section, sense only though.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=28592636
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2