I'm really sorry to be starting a new thread, but I've been racking my brains over this problem and haven't got anywhere yet. I know it's not the application so it must be something I've done, just not sure what!
Until today I have been able to use the BuildOS.exe in both Pandora and Core's kitchens without problem. Haven't tried using it for a few weeks, but with the new OS build today tried Pandora. Unfortunately, when I try to open BuildOS, it reports it has encountered a problem and needs to close. It offers the choice of reporting to Microsoft or not (reporting produces no suggested fixes).
Have uninstalled .NET Framework 3, 2, 1.1 and 1 and then re-installed them from Microsoft Update but at each stage the error message has been the same. I've also tried Googling for problems with BuildOS, but each just suggests installing .NET Framework 2. Searching for the error message codes didn't producing anything either.
I'm attaching the first screen of the error message but cannot work out how to copy and paste the actual error (it's unselectable).
If anyone has any ideas at all, I'd really appreciate them as I'm out. Thanks for reading this post and please don't flame unless they're REALLY funny!
The attachment doesnt really give much information..
Try print-screening the error and paste it into paint then cut out just the error and post it.. though im guessing it just says something lke unhandled exception or something like that..
You can also try looking around the system error logs in Control Panel\Administrative Tools\Event Log where you might find some details of the error.
have you installed or uninstalled anything in those few weeks?
the only thing I get from that log file is the mscorelib - .NET Framework...
Maybe try MS .NET Compact FW? I have 1.0 SP3 and 2.0 SP1...
Step by step
Lets try to isolate the problem:
Step 1: Try to use an older version of pandora, if its working something is wrong with your download of the latest version.
Step 2: You said that you haven't use the kitchen for some weeks. What have you installed and/or deinstalled since the last use of the kitchen? Maybe another program on your desktop computer is in conflict with .net or the kitchen.
Problem located, just got to fix it now!
Thanks for the suggestions guys, should've thought of the event viewer myself! D'oh!
The report viewer shows the problem is in my .NET 2 installation, so at least I know where to concentrate now.
Time for the big stick with the nail in it, I think!
Thanks again Sam and matt. I know you're both very busy and really do appreciate you taking the time to help.
EDIT: Sorry Gerald, your post showed up while I was typing. Thank you very much for the suggestion and bringing me back to sanity! Will try an older version first, just in case, and then going to play around with my .NET installations.
mattk_r said:
Maybe try MS .NET Compact FW? I have 1.0 SP3 and 2.0 SP1...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uhh, in my world .NET CF runs on a device.
The problem continues...
Bugger - tried a shortcut and it didn't work! Copied the Pandora setup files and installed them on my laptop, only for that to come up with the same error message!
The laptop has very little installed on it and has only been up and running from a fresh install for two weeks. I've got basic drivers, AVG Anti-virus, Spybot and MS Office 2003 installed and that's about it. It's also completely up to date on MS Updates (I'm anal like that) so has .NETs up to 3.0 installed.
I also tried downloading Core's kitchen onto the laptop but again the BuildOS in that reports the same error.
The error shows under Event Viewer > Application as:
Event Type: Error
Event Source: .NET Runtime 2.0 Error Reporting
Event Category: None
Event ID: 5000
Date: 14/08/2007
Time: 21:07:36
User: N/A
Computer: MINI-LAPTOP
Description:
EventType clr20r3, P1 buildos.exe, P2 0.0.0.0, P3 45fef3bf, P4 mscorlib, P5 2.0.0.0, P6 461eee3d, P7 331e, P8 119, P9 system.io.directorynotfound, P10 NIL.
For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
Data:
0000: 63 00 6c 00 72 00 32 00 c.l.r.2.
0008: 30 00 72 00 33 00 2c 00 0.r.3.,.
0010: 20 00 62 00 75 00 69 00 .b.u.i.
0018: 6c 00 64 00 6f 00 73 00 l.d.o.s.
0020: 2e 00 65 00 78 00 65 00 ..e.x.e.
0028: 2c 00 20 00 30 00 2e 00 ,. .0...
0030: 30 00 2e 00 30 00 2e 00 0...0...
0038: 30 00 2c 00 20 00 34 00 0.,. .4.
0040: 35 00 66 00 65 00 66 00 5.f.e.f.
0048: 33 00 62 00 66 00 2c 00 3.b.f.,.
0050: 20 00 6d 00 73 00 63 00 .m.s.c.
0058: 6f 00 72 00 6c 00 69 00 o.r.l.i.
0060: 62 00 2c 00 20 00 32 00 b.,. .2.
0068: 2e 00 30 00 2e 00 30 00 ..0...0.
0070: 2e 00 30 00 2c 00 20 00 ..0.,. .
0078: 34 00 36 00 31 00 65 00 4.6.1.e.
0080: 65 00 65 00 33 00 64 00 e.e.3.d.
0088: 2c 00 20 00 33 00 33 00 ,. .3.3.
0090: 31 00 65 00 2c 00 20 00 1.e.,. .
0098: 31 00 31 00 39 00 2c 00 1.1.9.,.
00a0: 20 00 73 00 79 00 73 00 .s.y.s.
00a8: 74 00 65 00 6d 00 2e 00 t.e.m...
00b0: 69 00 6f 00 2e 00 64 00 i.o...d.
00b8: 69 00 72 00 65 00 63 00 i.r.e.c.
00c0: 74 00 6f 00 72 00 79 00 t.o.r.y.
00c8: 6e 00 6f 00 74 00 66 00 n.o.t.f.
00d0: 6f 00 75 00 6e 00 64 00 o.u.n.d.
00d8: 20 00 4e 00 49 00 4c 00 .N.I.L.
00e0: 0d 00 0a 00 ....
I know this now definitely isn't a WM6 problem but I'm adding this info in case one of the great XDA Dev minds knows the solution, and in case another user like me experiences the same problem - you're not alone and I'll update the thread when I find the solution!
Here's a stab at it (albeit a simple one). When using Pandora, do you have everything in the proper folder structure? The following applies:
(in this example, everything is thrown into a main folder "Pandora")
- Pandora (parent folder)
- BuildOS.exe (file)
- CreateROM.bat (file)
- pkgcommon.dll (file)
- OEM (sub folder)
- ROM (sub folder)
- SYS (sub folder)
- TOOLS (sub folder)
If you don't follow this hierarchy, Windows will shoot an error out at you.
Good luck!
Thanks Taurus, good suggestion. I've also got an inconsequential Readme.txt file in there too, but other than that - all present and correct!
Again, thanks for all your suggestions guys and once I find the solution I'll be sure to post it up.
You run buildOS from the command line, make sure you cd to the folder containing OEM/SYS/ROM and TOOLS .... THEN run buildOS from wherever it is by typing the full path into cmd, or even better add buildOS to the PATH variable .
so you need to follow this kind of procedure:
Code:
cd c:\ROMFOLDER (ENTER)
then...
c:\ROMTOOLSFOLDER\BuildOS (ENTER)
remember ROMFOLDER and ROMTOOLSFOLDER should be replaced by the paths you use.....its a PITA but thats how it runs.
Confused Stu said:
Thanks Taurus, good suggestion. I've also got an inconsequential Readme.txt file in there too, but other than that - all present and correct!
Again, thanks for all your suggestions guys and once I find the solution I'll be sure to post it up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem. I just wanted to clarify what I meant, as I don't know if I was that clear.
I've attached a shot of everything the way it should look. Anyhow, it sounds like you have it right already, but I thought I'd just float that your way.
vp3G said:
Uhh, in my world .NET CF runs on a device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It gets installed with VS Team Suite 2k5, probably since it has the CE mobile device emulators included.
Confused Stu - if you're still having trouble with .NET, let me know. I supported this stuff for M$, and know a few tricks to getting it cleaned up and installed.
Only common factor - interface between keyboard and chair!
OK, I've spent this evening wiping and rebuilding my laptop. It's got XP SP2 on it, then added the laptop drivers, the Kitchen and ran all the Microsoft Updates until only the .NETs were left.
Tried running BuildOS with no .NETs installed, and it came up with a message telling me the application wasn't in the correct state and re-installing it might help.
Installed .NET 1 (same message on trying to open BuildOS), then installed the updates for .NET 1 - same message. Installed .NET 2 and immediately got the original error I was getting on my home PC and other laptop! Went on to install the updates for .NET 2 and finally .NET 3 - but the same error kept coming up.
I've now got this same error coming up my Home PC (self-built), my Dell laptop, and my newly rebuilt Medion one! I've got no common files besides the MS Updates and no common components. Beginning to think maybe it's just plain personal!
Matt - if you can help at all with my .NET problems, I'd be ridiculously grateful. Alternatively, if anyone can suggest another avenue I can try please post it up - I'm almost out of ideas!
I've got another fresh install going on at work (Dell desktop this time) so tomorrow I'm going to try installing only .NET 1 and .NET 2 - not even any other MS Updates. Then if i install the updates one at a time I might be able to work out the problem one. Still not sure why I'm the only person affected by this though?
First of all, you are not alone, have a look at:
http://www.google.at/search?hl=de&q...time+2.0+Error+Reporting+Event+ID:+5000&meta=
Now for the bad news: I checked the first ten posts or so, they recommend to debug the code. But as its running on other machines without any problems it must be something within your .net installion.
man, this is strange.
I had a similar problem with BuildOS but with me it happened anytime I tried to add a package to the OEM folder.
Have you made any changes to anything from the Kitchen?
Matt said that you can't just add a package because its signed ( or something).
FIXED!!!!
Allan1 - you're a star!!!!
I've just deleted out the OEM (and SYS) folders, unzipped the v6 kitchen again and it's worked perfectly! Looks like my problem was I was unzipping the v6.1 (beta) OEM over the top of the existing OEM and that was causing my problems.
Don't I feel like a complete doughnut!
Sorry for wasting everyone's time, and THANK YOU very, very, very much for everyone's help and suggestions on this. It's really touching that so many people were willing to try to help me out.
Now commence the "what an idiot" flaming if anyone wants to - it's justified!
No probs!!
allan1 said:
I had a similar problem with BuildOS but with me it happened anytime I tried to add a package to the OEM folder.
Have you made any changes to anything from the Kitchen?
Matt said that you can't just add a package because its signed ( or something).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good looking out...just encountered this problem in HYPERCORE....driving me insane why it wasn't working cuz I just built 3 .nb's in the last few hours.
thanks alot
Any idea how Kies identify model? It seems not via AT Commands...
Or I am dumb...
AT+DEVCONINFO
I have used portmon to sniff communication...
Maybe it is the name, what Explorer shows?...
So the mass thingie USB driver...
How for instance S8600 answers in Explorer?
Best Regards
May be it?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=11286021&postcount=78
amss.bin I have checked... maybe not.
I have tried MANY combinations... maybe I have something not seen.
Maybe much easier.
Little example how bada Version is checked... Attention, high protection...
extreme hardcoded to prevent change...
2 parts needed...
Part 1:
SystemFS\User\OspSys\registry\buildnumber.ini
Part 2:
SystemFS/User/OspSys/registry/systeminfo.ini
Compare with latest Firmware and you know how to prepare your bada 1.x device for bada 3.0 Apps.
Anyway, I'm blind to manage Kies to work as S8600...
Best Regards
Okay, I've found Original Screenshot of S8600...
But I know where this Text String is stored...
But I can remember, I've tried this... and was not enough...
Maybe I'll try again.
Best Regards
It can be usb device description string in USB driver on phone or PC side (if it's PC side, description is paired with certain PID and VID), try to connect phone to linux in kies mode and use lsusb -a (aint sure if it's -a, anyway the thing is to get verbose info about device)
Hi, I think stune reads the same data that the kies when connected to the terminal.
I mean:
STUNE when you start telling us the firmware version terminal model of our product code, even our imei
Not fully correct
There is something in the PC driver that needs to be changed
You can see this in the driver details
Best Regards
Maybe Kies via Wi-Fi easier...
Not tested yet.
Best Regards
Bus reported device description is sent from device during USB enumeration. So model id is stored in Bada USB module. I'm nearly sure it's unicode string.
Maybe my fault...
AT+PROF="Device
Leads to file device.xml...
Will compare Wave 1, 2, 3 device.xml ...
Best Regards
Edit 1...
Code:
<ModelName value="GT-S8500"/>
<BaseModelName value="GT-S8500"/>
<ProjectName value="Lismore"/>
<FriendlyName value="Lismore"/>
<ProductLineup value="HHP"/>
Code:
<ModelName value="Wave 3"/>
<BaseModelName value="GT-S7250"/>
<ProjectName value="Wave3"/>
<FriendlyName value="Wave3"/>
<ProductLineup value="HHP"/>
Kies now shows other Error
Please, maybe someone can post from S8600 under Explorer...
Remember to remove IMEI...
I think this is MTP device... USB blabla portable Device Driver under Device Manager in Windows...
PS...
Text Samsung... in white Background is editable...
Edit 1.
Hmmm... Wave 2 can't edit ... grey colored...
Screenshot from S8600 would be nice.
Thanx in advance.
why do you think AT+DEVCONINFO is wrong? whole infos including imei in one packet
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=20497198&postcount=15
Because I've found all files and positions to make 1:1 clone... including IMEI...
But this is not working for Kies.
Kies shows Error, that unsupported device is attached.
Best Regards
error it is kind of progress
what about these ones
Code:
Request: m-obex/connection_packet
82 00 23 CB 00 00 00 01 42 00 1B 6D 2D 6F 62 65 78 2F 63 6F 6E 6E 65 63 74 69 6F 6E 5F 70 61 63 6B 65 74
Answer:
A0 00 03
Request: m-obex/security/privacylock
83 00 27 CB 00 00 00 00 42 00 1F 6D 2D 6F 62 65 78 2F 73 65 63 75 72 69 74 79 2F 70 72 69 76 61 63 79 6C 6F 63 6B 00
Answer:
A0 00 12 C3 00 00 00 02 4C 00 05 00 00 49 00 05 00 00
Request: m-obex/fs/privacy_lock
83 00 22 CB 00 00 00 00 42 00 1A 6D 2D 6F 62 65 78 2F 66 73 2F 70 72 69 76 61 63 79 5F 6C 6F 63 6B 00
Answer:
A0 00 0D C3 00 00 00 02 49 00 05 4E 4F *
Request: m-obex/application/count
83 00 27 CB 00 00 00 00 42 00 1C 6D 2D 6F 62 65 78 2F 61 70 70 6C 69 63 61 74 69 6F 6E 2F 63 6F 75 6E 74 00 4C 00 03
Answer:
A0 00 14 C3 00 00 00 04 4C 00 05 00 00 49 00 07 2C 00 00 00
Request: m-obex/system/imsi
83 00 21 CB 00 00 00 00 42 00 16 6D 2D 6F 62 65 78 2F 73 79 73 74 65 6D 2F 69 6D 73 69 00 4C 00 03
Answer: IMSI ;)
A0 00 1F .....
Request: ƒm-obex/system/mnc
83 00 20 CB 00 00 00 00 42 00 15 6D 2D 6F 62 65 78 2F 73 79 73 74 65 6D 2F 6D 6E 63 00 4C 00 03
Answer: 02
A0 00 12 C3 00 00 00 02 4C 00 05 00 00 49 00 05 30 32
Request: ƒm-obex/system/csc
83 00 20 CB 00 00 00 00 42 00 15 6D 2D 6F 62 65 78 2F 73 79 73 74 65 6D 2F 63 73 63 00 4C 00 03
Answer: S8500OXAJID
A0 00 1B C3 00 00 00 0B 4C 00 05 00 00 49 00 0E 53 38 35 30 30 4F 58 41 4A 49 44
Request: m-obex/system/openapiversion
83 00 2B CB 00 00 00 00 42 00 20 6D 2D 6F 62 65 78 2F 73 79 73 74 65 6D 2F 6F 70 65 6E 61 70 69 76 65 72 73 69 6F 6E 00 4C 00 03
Answer: 1.2.0_1009152352_LIS_S8500XXJID_XEO
A0 00 33 C3 00 00 00 23 4C 00 05 00 00 49 00 26 31 2E 32 2E 30 5F 31 30 30 39 31 35 32 33 35 32 5F 4C 49 53 5F 53 38 35 30 30 58 58 4A 49 44 5F 58 45 4F
Request: m-obex/application/getinstallsetting
83 00 33 CB 00 00 00 00 42 00 28 6D 2D 6F 62 65 78 2F 61 70 70 6C 69 63 61 74 69 6F 6E 2F 67 65 74 69 6E 73 74 61 6C 6C 73 65 74 74 69 6E 67 00 4C 00 03
Answer:
A0 00 14 C3 00 00 00 04 4C 00 05 00 00 49 00 07 01 00 00 00
m-obex/system/csc and
m-obex/system/openapiversion ?
Thank you.
m-obex I have no success because also not enough knowledge.
See here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=20954943&postcount=3
Best Regards
I've somewhere correct sequence to start obex on wave. I will post later
Good afternoon if it will not for anything in this case but I found this on apps_compressed:
x40BF86FF 'kDHd:! eNULL: @ STRENGTH'
0x40BF8765 'eNULL:! ANULL: @ STRENGTH'
0x40BF8784:'/../ cx / source / Xsupplicant / src / auth_methods / eapfast / eapfast.c '
0x40BF889C:'/../ cx / source / Xsupplicant / src / auth_methods / eapfast / eapfast_key.c '
0x40BFAE8C '/ www.openssl.org / support / faq.html'
0x40BFB506: '23456789ABCDEF '
0x40BFC610 '] VOHyrkd'
0x40BFD099: '56789.: AbcdefABCDEF '
ferrloz said:
Good afternoon if it will not for anything in this case but I found this on apps_compressed:
x40BF86FF 'kDHd:! eNULL: @ STRENGTH'
0x40BF8765 'eNULL:! ANULL: @ STRENGTH'
0x40BF8784:'/../ cx / source / Xsupplicant / src / auth_methods / eapfast / eapfast.c '
0x40BF889C:'/../ cx / source / Xsupplicant / src / auth_methods / eapfast / eapfast_key.c '
0x40BFAE8C '/ www.openssl.org / support / faq.html'
0x40BFB506: '23456789ABCDEF '
0x40BFC610 '] VOHyrkd'
0x40BFD099: '56789.: AbcdefABCDEF '
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Umm, sorry, it's not helping anything in that case. FYI there are literally tenths of thousands such char strings in apps_compressed. Good you're looking tho. ;P
Maybe my goal is not clear enough...
Most of us have NO S8600...
But S8600 has few nice NEW Apps.
You can download without attached handset EVERY App you can find via Kies.
BUT not install if attached handset is not valid...
My goal is to make S8500 valid to install S8600 Apps via Kies.
Solution 1 is wait...
Maybe Samsung will offer these Apps like Tintin before Christmas 2012...
Really realistic...
I think minimum 2-3 months not available for S8500/S8530 to be exclusive for S8600...
Solution...
Move your bu ehm brain.
This mission is NOT impossible.
Best Regards
Sorry for them to lose the time, now I will focus more on the subject.
ferrloz thanks.
While looking for a way on linux to update my bootloader to use a real recovery partition, I found this little gem:
munjeni said:
Here is aditional trick to install openbootloader without needs for emma:
Code:
//===========================================================
// Rhine S1 Boot Config Data
//
// Config Data Description: http://metadoc.sonyericsson.net/?DOCS=1/15935-5/FCP1191274 PA2
// Honami
//
//
//
// Created: 20150417 1730
// Author: Magnus Strandh, 23048553
//
// Specification document: 8/159 35-LXE 108 010, Rev PA4
// Format:
// [TAPartition<HEX8>]{1}
// [UnitID<HEX32> UnitSize<HEX16> Data<HEX8>{UnitSize}]{n}
//===========================================================
02
// this enables recovery mode (aka installs openbootloader)
0000084f 0054 1A CE 28 00 01 00 06 05 00 02 02 51 00 10 03 00 02 04 02 05 00 01 03 02 00 10 05 00 03 03 05 00 10 05 00 05 83 02 00 10 02 00 05 85 0A 00 02 00 A9 09 BE BA A9 09 00 00 04 00 03 00 02 00 04 00 04 00 B0 04 0E 00 06 00 B8 0B 01 4B 00 00 00 03 96 00 2C 01
000008fd 0001 00
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would like to understand more about this protocol. Was it created by Qualcomm? Sony/Ericsson?
What tools use this protocol? I understand that Androxyde's FlashTool is supposed to do the right thing when it finds this in a .ta file packed within an .ftf file, but FlashTool is huge, and I don't like the idea of reading all of its source code just to find the parts that relate to this protocol.
The Config Data Description URL above is broken; metadoc.sonyericsson.net no longer exists. Is the referenced document still available somewhere? Is there any other documentation?
I just tried my luck googling Markus Strandh at Ericsson and found this profile at LinkedIn. Job desription says
Senior Sw Architect at Sony Mobile Communications
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
. So he might as well be the author of the document. And if he is he might know where to find that file you're looking for.
In case you don't have a LinkedIn account let me know
Thanks. I don't do LinkedIn, but I might try to find his contact info once I know a little more.
I'm hoping someone here (@munjeni? @Androxyde?) can chime in with which programs are known to apply these files.
I found munjeni's newflasher today. The source code is far easier to understand than Flashtool, and although it doesn't answer all my questions, it does help reveal how these bootloader config files are supposed to be applied to a device. Nice.