Multiloader 5.65 - Bada Software and Hacking General

New version of multiloader v5.65, this version is improved Test It
multiupload.com/SGCU73AT5W

... this version use in the win 7 ... because win 7 not visible screen with MTL 5.64 ... by psycoy ...

this program says: ----Interface was improved by Xenon----
its just a modification of MultiLoader 5.64 or its an official version?... or just the changelog its the GUI modification?
anyway... it looks so good!

xator91
ThankISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS _2_ You For This Useful Post

Attention.
Original.
5.62 and 5.64 are over 100 KB... also my 5.65.
Original 5.65 attached here.
@ xator91
Please tell us differences, what is improved?
Filesize?
Btw.:
I not use 5.65 at all.
As my 5.64 runs very stable at Win XP SP3 to flash S8500.
Best Regards

Adfree Hello, I also use version 5.64, this version 5.65 posted by
me, have only new GUI.
psycoy, is absolutely not true that 5.65 solves the problems with Windows 7, because I
I use the Windows 7 and 5.64.
Best Regards.

... for the reason of my answer I invite you to read here ... http://www.badanation.de/topic.php?t=2963&page=1 ...

adfree said:
Attention.
Original.
5.62 and 5.64 are over 100 KB... also my 5.65.
Original 5.65 attached here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's a big difference indeed:
V5.65 ~50KB: Virustotal.com online check reports some malware
V5.65 you posted (>100KB): no malware reported by Virustotal.com
Some doubts it's been filled with malware and compressed...

adfree can you post your version of 5.64 here? Thanks mate.
This modified version of 5.65 is nice. Looks like "Xenon" cleaned up the interface and the layout is nicer. For those interested, you can do this using Resource Hacker. As for containing viruses, modding a program doesn't inject anything. Often it's simply a packed .EXE file that the virus scanners detect as a virus. But in reality often it's a false positive and lazy scanning, as they detect it's been packed, and then just assume it's a virus/trojan.
As for this particular modded 5.65, as to whether it contains a virus, it came up clean when I scanned it at my end.

KrazyKong said:
As for containing viruses, modding a program doesn't inject anything. Often it's simply a packed .EXE file that the virus scanners detect as a virus. But in reality often it's a false positive and lazy scanning, as they detect it's been packed, and then just assume it's a virus/trojan.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Modern AVs can scan and even unpack compressed exe files without troubles, belive me. Since the other versions than that provided by adfree (clean) have been reported as suspicious by 6 AV engines (not just 1, though false positives are always possible) my advice is to not risk just for a nice looking GUI.
You can test the files by yourself with virus online check services like Jotti.org or Virustotal...

hexaae said:
Modern AVs can scan and even unpack compressed exe files without troubles, belive me. Since the other versions than that provided by adfree (clean) have been reported as suspicious by 6 AV engines (not just 1, though false positives are always possible) my advice is to not risk just for a nice looking GUI.
You can test the files by yourself with virus online check services like Jotti.org or Virustotal...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is true, come AV scanners do detect packed compressed exe files. But most take a lazy approach and dish out false positives. There are many packers other than UPX, and that seems to be the issue. I encounter false positives all the time, and even scanning them on Jotti or VT, they also give a false positive alot of the time.

I'm only change interface in resource editor, without any program code manipulations. This file UPX packed and don't contain viruses. Relax guys
P.S. I posted this mod on a Russian website, but now he is on xda-developers without my participation. Bada-community has no boundaries

Either way thanks for that mod, it makes the "boot" "master rom" "full flash" and so on buttons visible on my XP machine. (I haven't yet check for viruses, but I don't have anything else than multiloader on my XP, as it's just there for flashing (using Linux normally), so nothing could happen actually to me).

Hi guys , I am warning you for this program .. It is a virus for the computer
Please , Don't download it

It's not a virus. I checked it, once unpacked, it's clean. Don't rely on results for compressed stuff. One person even told me, that one of the applications I wrote is a virus (though it's been the anti-virus that couldn't handle Tar/XZ compression).

Setialpha said:
It's not a virus. I checked it, once unpacked, it's clean. Don't rely on results for compressed stuff. One person even told me, that one of the applications I wrote is a virus (though it's been the anti-virus that couldn't handle Tar/XZ compression).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have tested it and it was a maleware .. I am honest
Best regards..

The attached file has a virus!!!
The attached file has a virus, after executing it I got my computer locked with the police virus asking for 100 euros if I didn't want my hdd to be wiped.
adfree said:
Attention.
Original.
5.62 and 5.64 are over 100 KB... also my 5.65.
Original 5.65 attached here.
@ xator91
Please tell us differences, what is improved?
Filesize?
Btw.:
I not use 5.65 at all.
As my 5.64 runs very stable at Win XP SP3 to flash S8500.
Best Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Does it start in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS or Windows 8?
Mine doesn't work

MinorPro said:
Does it start in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS or Windows 8?
Mine doesn't work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'm tested ml 5.67 version on Win 8 and it is working perfectly

Related

Filesystem, Filemanager...

Known Filemanager.
Most popular is sTune.
PSAS 1.5 with TFS Browser (Samsung Modem)
PSAS can create folder.
BUT folder can't be delete.
Write protected. So maybe this is 1 reason why not possible in sTune...
TkFileExplorer_2.2.exe
Seems Original leaked Samsung stuff, but extreme old... 2001 or something.
Not really tested yet by me.
Maybe someone saw newer Version TkFileExplorer?
PSAS will soon offer few more features.
In PSAS 1.5 SD card is included, so not use Backup to Zip...
Best Regards
P.S.:
One dream is an Filemanager bada App on handset.
But at the moment it seems many restrictions, so no access to internal FS from handset...
gr8 information buddy
stune hangs a lot
still searching for the best file manager!
it wud be really helpful if u cud provide the download links..............for all these managers
THAKUR90
see section bada utilities u will get all these
sTune I used many times without problems.
PSAS 1.5 has few problems at the moment.
BUT will fix soon in new Version.
http://psas.revskills.de/
- Backup FS to Zip not work correctly
But you can create folders.
TkFileExplorer is attached. But not tested by me... maybe tooooo old.
Maybe someone could upload newer or complete TKTool.
Best Regards
adfree said:
Known Filemanager.
Most popular is sTune.
PSAS 1.5 with TFS Browser (Samsung Modem)
PSAS can create folder.
BUT folder can't be delete.
Write protected. So maybe this is 1 reason why not possible in sTune...
TkFileExplorer_2.2.exe
Seems Original leaked Samsung stuff, but extreme old... 2001 or something.
Not really tested yet by me.
Maybe someone saw newer Version TkFileExplorer?
PSAS will soon offer few more features.
In PSAS 1.5 SD card is included, so not use Backup to Zip...
Best Regards
P.S.:
One dream is an Filemanager bada App on handset.
But at the moment it seems many restrictions, so no access to internal FS from handset...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HI.
You can use mini commander on the phone to access all the internal files of the phone. its a java version..
mini commander sounds interessting.
Thanx for hint.
I will download and try and post later result.
Best Regards
Edit.
Now tested, seems nice. But not what I thought...
Anyway. Thanx.
Try MyExplorer. Its a native Bada app.
Today I tried MyExplorer.
http://www.samsungapps.com/topApps/topAppsDetail.as?productId=G00000248525
Also not exactly what I wish... But you have access to hidden folder on Memory Card.
[email protected]@[email protected]@__
Best Regards
I'm working on a FileExplorer for Samsung Wave, you can read about it in the other bada section (which i'm not allowed to post in):
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=958457
I had a good play with TkFileExplorer. It should be able to connect with the Wave, but I was not able to make a connection stick.
TkFileExplorer isn't very friendly in terms of how to set it up, but I was able to get it to at least try and connect to the phone. However it times out afterwhile, and you see there's a new drive letter P:. But it disappears from TkFileExplorer as soon as you click ok on the error message screen.
I tried connecting it in Kies mode and also usb debugging mode. Still not sure which one it's supposed to be set to. But I did find some posts for older Samsung phones where they connected in PC Studio mode.
I'm going to try again on another computer as I think the usb drivers and such might be conflicting.
It might help to know what the COM settings are that WaveBackup and sTune use to connect to the phone. I've been leaving all the settings at default but there might be some trickery that needs to occur.
About incoming WaveBackup Tool.
More and more progress, see Screenshot of Version 1.0.7
Fell free to test self. Here are the infos:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=958457
@ mortara
Thank you very much for developing hard.
@ KrazyKong
Thank you very much for testing and reporting.
@ all
Please help to improve stability. Test and report will help to make Wavebackup more stable.
Thanx.
Sorry for resized Screenshot. Limit seems 640 x 480... so look into attached
WaveBackup107.rar for full 1920 x 200 Pixel.
Best Regards
Hello,
Version 1.0.7 of WaveBackup can now be obtained by everyone from my homepage.
No registrattion the forum needed anymore.
Patrick
mortara said:
Hello,
Version 1.0.7 of WaveBackup can now be obtained by everyone from my homepage.
No registrattion the forum needed anymore.
Patrick
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks
i'll try it right now
mortara said:
Hello,
Version 1.0.7 of WaveBackup can now be obtained by everyone from my homepage.
No registrattion the forum needed anymore.
Patrick
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks man! you save me!
You're welcome! I just uploaded Version 1.0.10 to my homepage. It has an option to add files and folders to a 'blacklist' so that they won't be copied in file explorer operations anymore.
... Mortara hello I've been on your forum and I downloaded the application ... Unfortunately, the release is 1.0.9 ... where that next ... thanks by psycoy
Oh, sorry, you're right. Something must have gone wrong with the upload. I've fixed that now, so just download it again from my homepage (can't put external links here yet).
Version 1.0.12 of WaveBackup is up since a few days. I have done some smaller changes to stop annyoing owners of Wave II and 723 with that long error-message when connecting. Another change is that sizes of folders will be displayed now in explorer view, when the complete folder tree has been fetched. I've also fixed a few bugs.
Oh, and last but not least: Files can be copied now to the phone in explorer view (but still restricted to some special folders (<Appid>/Data for example)
I still can't post in the other bada board here, where the 'real' WaveBackup Thread can be found, so i hope everyone there sees this too!
@ All
I found a "new" version of TkFileExplorer - 2.4, it works fine with my Wave. TkFileExplorer is able to delete or rename folders and it is more stable than sTune.

[Q] How to edit .so files present in the ShpAPP Bada firmware file?

I need a disassembler to decompile and recompile .so files which I believe are Linux binaries coded in C or C++. I am on Windows Vista and I would appreciate it if anyone could help me find Linux binary decompliers for Windows. If we are able to edit these files, Cufirmwares will be a reality!
They are signed by RSA 1024...
Best Regards
We can try to research a little bit in these files... maybe we find usefull things.
But to replace or to edit them should be very tough...
Not tested by me. I've only seen files in data folder...
Anyway, you can try and report.
Best Regards
Edit 1.
Attached little overview... based on XXJL2:
Code:
SystemFS\Osp\AppControl.so
SystemFS\Osp\BluetoothAppControl.so
SystemFS\Osp\BrowserAppControl.so
SystemFS\Osp\CalendarAppControl.so
SystemFS\Osp\CameraAppControl.so
SystemFS\Osp\CommerceAppControl.so
SystemFS\Osp\ContactAppControl.so
SystemFS\Osp\data
SystemFS\Osp\FGraphicsEgl.so
SystemFS\Osp\FGraphicsOpengl.so
SystemFS\Osp\FMediaPiServer.so
SystemFS\Osp\FMessagingPiServer.so
SystemFS\Osp\FNetPiServer.so
SystemFS\Osp\FOsp.so
SystemFS\Osp\FOspPiClient.so
SystemFS\Osp\FSecurityPiServer.so
SystemFS\Osp\FSevenPiServer.so
SystemFS\Osp\FSocialPiServer.so
SystemFS\Osp\FSystemPi.so
SystemFS\Osp\FSystemPiServer.so
SystemFS\Osp\FUixPiServer.so
SystemFS\Osp\FWebPiServer.so
SystemFS\Osp\GenericAppControl.so
SystemFS\Osp\libc-newlib.so.0
SystemFS\Osp\libCurl.so
SystemFS\Osp\libeay32.so
SystemFS\Osp\libexpat.so
SystemFS\Osp\libgcc_s.so.1
SystemFS\Osp\libm-newlib.so.0
SystemFS\Osp\libstdc++.so.6
SystemFS\Osp\libwrapper.so
SystemFS\Osp\libwrapperS.so
SystemFS\Osp\libZlib.so
SystemFS\Osp\mappserver.so
SystemFS\Osp\matrix.so
SystemFS\Osp\mbase.so
SystemFS\Osp\mbaseio.so
SystemFS\Osp\mcontentS.so
SystemFS\Osp\mdevDataSyncManagerServer.so
SystemFS\Osp\MediaAppControl.so
SystemFS\Osp\MessageAppControl.so
SystemFS\Osp\mlocCommon.so
SystemFS\Osp\mlocLocationAgent.so
SystemFS\Osp\mlocS.so
SystemFS\Osp\mosp.so
SystemFS\Osp\msAccel.so
SystemFS\Osp\msclLifelogPi.so
SystemFS\Osp\msclSnsGateway.so
SystemFS\Osp\msecCredentialManagerServer.so
SystemFS\Osp\msecCryptoPi.so
SystemFS\Osp\msecPrivilegeManagerServer.so
SystemFS\Osp\msGps.so
SystemFS\Osp\msMagnetic.so
SystemFS\Osp\msProximity.so
SystemFS\Osp\msTilt.so
SystemFS\Osp\msvcConnectionManagerServer.so
SystemFS\Osp\msvcMessageAgentServer.so
SystemFS\Osp\msWeather.so
SystemFS\Osp\msysserver.so
SystemFS\Osp\MTAdaptor.so
SystemFS\Osp\newlibAdaptor.so
SystemFS\Osp\Osp.so
SystemFS\Osp\ospmemory.so
SystemFS\Osp\OspServer.so
SystemFS\Osp\SettingAppControl.so
SystemFS\Osp\ShpAppFrmwkClient.so
SystemFS\Osp\ShpGWESMEClient.so
SystemFS\Osp\ShpGWESWinSetClient.so
SystemFS\Osp\ShpScAdaptor.so
SystemFS\Osp\ShpScPushAdaptor.so
SystemFS\Osp\ShpWinServer.so
SystemFS\Osp\SignInAppControl.so
SystemFS\Osp\SnsAuthAppControl.so
SystemFS\Osp\sqlite360.so
SystemFS\Osp\ssleay32.so
SystemFS\Osp\StubDynCast.so
SystemFS\Osp\TestUtil.so
SystemFS\Osp\WidgetAppControl.so
astrotom said:
I need a disassembler to decompile and recompile .so files which I believe are Linux binaries coded in C or C++. I am on Windows Vista and I would appreciate it if anyone could help me find Linux binary decompliers for Windows. If we are able to edit these files, Cufirmwares will be a reality!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only one windows disassembler works fine with ARM Elf files - it is IDA pro. Hte can be used as a hex-editor, and is well recognize elf-header (this information may be usefull), but can not disassemble arm code.
is sharing pirated programs against the forum rules????
i found IDA pro but don't know for real how to deal with it
mylove90 said:
is sharing pirated programs against the forum rules????
i found IDA pro but don't know for real how to deal with it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you please share IDA Pro? It would be a great help!
ok it is a torrent file in fact
here you go
Mod edit: Removed link to pirated software.
We need to find a way to decrypt these RSA 1024bit encryptions somehow. Research shows that RSA 1024bit is not as secure as t seems.
mylove90 said:
ok it is a torrent file in fact
here you go
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for that! You have by no chance the latest IDA Pro 6.1? It supports ARM code debugging and Android bytecode (Dalvik) dissassembly.
made my research and it is obviously cracked before by 3 men
they used 81 Pentium 4 processors and it took from them 104 hours to make it happen
i don't see that easy at all
no i don't have 6.1
i looked for it too but i think that version supports arm processor too
don't know about other things but i'll keep looking for it
mylove90 said:
made my research and it is obviously cracked before by 3 men
they used 81 Pentium 4 processors and it took from them 104 hours to make it happen
i don't see that easy at all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I think 10-20 core i7 processors will more than surpass the 80 pentium 4's
mylove90 said:
made my research and it is obviously cracked before by 3 men
they used 81 Pentium 4 processors and it took from them 104 hours to make it happen
i don't see that easy at all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should read more carefully as you don't understand the nature of that attack. If you had the possibility to sign arbitrary data you wouldn't need to attack the private key in the first place.
Nice would be, we would known which Cert is used. Maybe in Security folder...
Or if only public key is somewhere in the NAND...
And btw... RSA 1024 private key to "generate" is tough. More then tough.
Simple example:
A-128 Byte is public key
B-128 Byte is the Signature
Signature contains Hash Value, depend on Settings in Cert... in other Words it is encrypted Hash.
MD5 or SHA1 is very often used...
Step 1.
If you know public key you can look into Signature.
You can decrypt...
Step 2.
Depend on your result... Maybe MD5 is in the Signature. Then you have 16 Byte.
Step 3.
You have to be sure, which part of Data is hashed ...
MD5 of full Data or not.
The private key is used to encrypt MD5 in my example...
So 16 Byte MD5 is encrypted by 128 Byte private key, result is the Signature:
128 Byte
Look here. This are 128 Byte:
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Okay. Looks not soooo big.
But hey, its HEX Value...
If you try to Brute Force then you have many, many MANY combinations to try.
The hardest part is to create Software for such RSA attacks...
To click 1 Button and wait maybe 3 years is not really problem.
But there is no such Software public to try it at home.
Some smart Hacker could start with RSA 32... I have forgotten which is smallest RSA allowed in Certs...
Best Regards
hahahaha
so funny the hex value code
imagine it as binary and yes it is like a nightmare to crack
astrotom said:
I need a disassembler to decompile and recompile .so files which I believe are Linux binaries coded in C or C++. I am on Windows Vista and I would appreciate it if anyone could help me find Linux binary decompliers for Windows. If we are able to edit these files, Cufirmwares will be a reality!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you describe what exactly you are planning to change there?
mijoma said:
Could you describe what exactly you are planning to change there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you dump the ShpApp file, you will find a lot of files in .so format. I thought we could dissassmble them just like any other normal binary so that I can explore into those files and see what I can change. But as adfree added, they are RSA 1024 bit encrypted files. All you will get in ASCII or unicode is non-human readable crap! *Disappointed*
astrotom said:
If you dump the ShpApp file, you will find a lot of files in .so format. I thought we could dissassmble them just like any other normal binary so that I can explore into those files and see what I can change. But as adfree added, they are RSA 1024 bit encrypted files. All you will get in ASCII or unicode is non-human readable crap! *Disappointed*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are SIGNED, not encrypted. We can disassemble them. What human-readable are you expecting to see? Is assembly human-readable enough?
adfree said:
Nice would be, we would known which Cert is used. Maybe in Security folder...
Or if only public key is somewhere in the NAND...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Under OSP/data for each .so file there are a .htb and a .sig file, maybe that could you help you to find what are looking for.
mijoma said:
They are SIGNED, not encrypted. We can disassemble them. What human-readable are you expecting to see? Is assembly human-readable enough?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried disassembling with IDA Pro but not much help since the disassembled code contains odd characters in some places where instead, codes should have been found.
If someone knows assembly codes, maybe he can help to rewrite the disassembled code in pure C/C++

[minnow for whale]USB Video Out Dev&Dig (Status:success)

We all remember at the MIX10 Joe Belfiore projects his phone onto the big screen. Even on the recent XBOX show he did that again.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IA28wRWAI8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCDXaJh4bwE
this kind of video out is through micro-usb, normal type one. You can find Joe is using a Lumia 800 in his hand in the XBOX video.
I asked him through twitter and received an answer of "Special Software build".
I did some research and dig into the register keys. Found something.
This is a special driver that only shared inside the MS and normally won't be out anytime soon.
...
(Deleted because they are no longer of any means)
...
----Update on 2012.Feb 9 China Time----
marsrogers said:
Big Step Forward, since the DFT Rom released, the exe can be run in WP7.
One thing I need now is if someone can build an app for me, which calls the changeusbprofile.exe under /windows
Things here is I'm using the Opera mini launcher to call it, but the path is under /application, not under /Windows, and the result is my computer can not detect the phone when the phone reboots. I think this may relates to the path I call.
I'm not a typical tech-man, so I need help here. Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
----Update on 2012.Feb 9 23:00 China Shanghai Time----
Today I really thank @GoodDayToDie and @ultrashot for helping so many.
@ultrashot sent me a xap app that does the job, calling the changusbprofile.exe in Windows folder. Although result is the same with yesterday, but now I am more sure that we are one more step closer to our destination. I'll wait my new micro usb cables to arrive and then I'll make a second try. Thank you again!!! Can't reach here without you kind people~~~
----Update on 2012.Feb 10 19:22 China Shanghai Time----
I removed the attachments because the project is now on special stage. I will put them back after the feature works, or after I can't make it work. Either way, I will put them back~~~Don't worry.
----Update on 2012.Feb 12 15:22 China Shanghai Time----
Complete failure....
New cable arrived and still my computer can't recognize the phone in usb video out mode...I changed a computer and till the same...
Will think about next steps...if I can't make figure it out next week, I shall put everything at present stage onto here.
----Update on 2012.Feb 14 10:22 China Shanghai Time----
Think it over, and think there is still a hill in front of us. The changeusbprofile.exe seems just to be a toggle, like a shortcut. But the real port of usb video out hasn't been enabled. On my samsung focus, I checked the *#7284# in Diagnosis Mode before and after I ran the changeusbprofile. The thing changes from Zun to Tethering, while it's not the real tethering mode. I think the changeusbprofile is just doing a job like changing usb mode from zune to tethering or to Diag mode. So that's to say, we haven't really seen the iceberg yet. I'll keep finding and hoping that anyone can get any help on this. This may requires me to dig some post in Windows Mobile age, since some parts between the two system are same.
And I contacted the kind secret person, and get the news that the usb cable doesn't really matters. Any short cables should serve the job. So our attention should move back onto the phone again.
----Update on 2012.Feb 15 15:13 China Shanghai Time----
I figured it out~The changeusbprofile changes the value in Registry Local_Machine/Drivers/USB/FunctionDrivers, DefaultClientDriver=CompositeFn to UFN_VIDSTREAM_CLASS. Every value change here points to a folder in FunctionDrivers.
in Samsung Focus, it is like below:
/CompositeFn;
/CompositeFn_QCOM;
/CompositeFn_SAMSUNG;(This is the one when we choose Diag Mode in Diagnosis App *#7284#)
/MtpClientDrvUsb;
/Samsung_USBSER_Modemlink;
/Serial_Class;
/Serial_Class_Diag_Qcom;
/Serial_Class_Nmea_Qcom;
/Serial_Class_Trace_Qcom;
/USBSER_Class;
/USBSER_Modemlink_Qcom;
There is no UFN_VIDSTREAM_CLASS folder here, so that explains why the changeusbprofile works well while it is no use at all...
Next step, I will try looking for the Setting in Asus E600, if I can find someone who has this device. Maybe Samsung Taylor will do the same.
If you can help, don't hesitate~~
----Update on 2012.Mar 3 15:13 China Shanghai Time----
marsrogers said:
Updated some info
I looked into the Key name, UFN_VIDSTREAM_CLASS, which is very unique way to name.
This belongs to a USB function Driver, and the only thing I saw similar is a UFN_PRINTER_CLASS, which is in Wince 6.0
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee483856(v=winembedded.60).aspx
And you may check this
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee485691(v=winembedded.60).aspx
So I'm still waiting for somebody who can offer any help on this. I talked with Mr. Yang Zhongke, who invented RecX prototype, fiinix optimized that, but not the inventor.
His way is not quite efficient and seems can't go further. But he will do some work for this in a foreseeable future.
Any one has a Asus E600, plz contact me, will keep your name secret.
Thanks!~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
----Update on 2012.Mar 6 1:02 China Shanghai Time----
Project suspended, cuz according to a source, WP8 will have Remote desktop support.
"The ability to take screenshots (via Remote Desktop, no less) will be a feature of Windows Phone 8. I don't see anything changing before that."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Only that you will be able to remote desktop into the Phone, which should allow you to create videos and/or screenshots from a PC."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The source is quite trustful, and I have no reason to doubt that.
So just be patient, and it will come. No need for this project to keep going.
At last, use my words in the email I talked with the source.
Me:Really puzzled why MS doesn't release such a cool and convenient feature. Haven't they realized that when people use this feature, they are promoting WP7 for free...(Actually I've promoted in this way for Android as a "side effect" in the company I work in for three months and as a result more than 20 Samsung Galaxy SII were added during this period. Google and Samsung should thank me...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
---Update on 2012.August 17 14:21 China Shanghai Time---
A very kind man has sent me the 7003 LG Panther ROM, which has the necessary file, and we successfully got them out. But I just lost my sell phone, so it may take some time to buy a new WP7 Samsung focus. Maybe next week. Very close to the final line. God bless us. Cheers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good luck!~
--Update on 2012.August 20 22:37 China Shanghai Time--
I tried to make it work while it still failed. The computer recognised my cellphone as WM7VIDSTREAM while the PC side app still does n't work.
I think this could be related to that the PC side app is for mango and the cellphone side is grabbed from 7003. I uploaded the VSD folder which contains what I think are the everything we need for now.
If anyone wants to build an rom, now it's the time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
--Update on 2012.August 23 17:42 China Shanghai Time--
One friend, who you will know someday later, gave me a home-make cab which includes the pkg file from Microsoft. Right now it is not for public for now. But it is successful.
Although I started this project, but as it always be, not a technique project but a sociology one. So there are many things and many people's benefit to consider. So just wait for some time, it is there when it is there.
For technique part, the pkg file includes as same as the VSD.rar in the attachment.
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
--Update on 2012.August 28 19:43 China Shanghai Time--
Check here, you have what you want. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1856509
This is a long story, and finally it ended beautifully.
"Always be closing"--Glengarry Glen Ross (1992)
To me? Yeah, this project closed.
Regards,
marsrogers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I can tell you a little about the thing you found (good investigation, by the way!)
First off, that's a module - it's kind of like a file (and shows up in the filesystem) but is baked into the ROM and can't be opened, much less modified, like a normal file.
There are tools that are supposed to be able to re-assemble modules, such as recmod. I haven't been able to get them to work, but maybe I'm just doing it wrong. In theory, it should be possible to create a "normal" DLL out of the components of a module.
The next trick is getting that rebuilt DLL onto the phone. This can be done pretty easily on Samsung, and is possible on interop-unlocked HTC, but on LG/Toshiba/Fujitsu/Dell/Nokia we don't currently have a way.
After that, you'll need to "install" the driver. Now, there's a registry entry for doing this. The problem is, I only know that the entry is required - I don't know if it's sufficient, or if there's also a database or something that must be updated. In any case, any phone where we can put a file into the Windows folder, we can also do registry editing.
Then there's the thing of actually getting the UI for this feature (the Settings "app" to control it). It's vaguely possible that the retail ROMs include it, but this is doubtful, so you'll probably need to pull it out of that old ROM. It's probably an EXE, so it's unlokely you can make a XAP for it - instead, you'll need to install it into the phone directly, including putting in the registry entried to launch it (this is a guess, I've never tried).
It's worth noting here that it's probably *WAY* easier to just pull that feature out of your old ROM and bake it into a custom ROM. This should be pretty straightforward, however, then it's only useful on custom ROMs, which in turn are only possible on HTC phones (right now).
GoodDayToDie said:
Well, I can tell you a little about the thing you found (good investigation, by the way!)
First off, that's a module - it's kind of like a file ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply. I did something with the recmod, but the dll it packed is only 1kb, apparently it's not useful. I guess it is because there is no imageinfo.bin inside the dll folder. I used some tools recommended by Da_G who started to try modding WP7 on the first day. Like nbsplit.exe to creat a IMGFS.bin, and use xidump to dump it. Just like what they have done before, I got the dll folders as same as I got at the beginning.
You may be right for the part that it's rather easier to build a new rom. There are tools to repack the whole IMGFS from files while I didn't find any good ways to pack a specific folder.
May ask more people all over the world (thx to the internet) cuz I just moved from android. In android, I use cygwin to pack the Odin Tar files, but it's totally different of course.
Anyway, doing this research is just for fun~ All is because MS is moving too slow...not to mention the NFC function I already have for a year on my Nexus S~~
Thank U again!~
This would be awesome good luck
Really a good find! Found that reg entry some time ago but I didn't care about it...Now that you bring up that thing again I also think that this could be very useful (even if you want it just for fun and not for business purposes). But note that the DLL file doesn't have to be in the /windows folder. It could be somewhere different, too.
@-WP7User-: That's an interesting idea, and might enable this to work on LG phones (where we have registry but not filesystem control). The registry value that speicies the path to the driver binary only ever gives the file name (example:
[HKLM\Drivers\Builtin\HTCFileUtility]
Dll="HTCFileUtility.dll")
However, it might work to specify a full path instead of just a relative one (relative to the \Windows folder, one must assume, since that's where the files in question are located).
However, there's still the issue of actually getting the phone to load the driver correctly. Just adding or editing the registry value for Drivers\Builtin didn't work for me - it did something (the driver stopped working when I chancged the value for an existing driver) - I wasn't able to make a user-added DLL work (even a different version of an official driver).
any news on this?
The old Recmod doesn't work on WP7 files. I believe there is a patched version for WP7 floating around XDA somewhere. Have to check my files, could of swore I downloaded it once.
EDIT: Here you go.
I have get the source code for creating the dcTNONE_ANALOGTV.dll, they are .c file and .def file.
My Problem is I don't know how to build them.
And I have got the changeusbmode.exe and the xml file with it. Figuring an idea to put them in.
marsrogers said:
I have get the source code for creating the dcTNONE_ANALOGTV.dll, they are .c file and .def file.
My Problem is I don't know how to build them.
And I have got the changeusbmode.exe and the xml file with it. Figuring an idea to put them in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download the FixRecMod.exe above I posted. Drag the dctNONE_analogtv.dll folder with the "s000 s001 s002 s003 s004" files in it over the exe. Now you'll find the actual DLL file inside the folder. Any problems, just upload the folder & I'll do it for you.
drkfngthdragnlrd said:
Download the FixRecMod.exe above I posted. Drag the dctNONE_analogtv.dll folder with the "s000 s001 s002 s003 s004" files in it over the exe. Now you'll find the actual DLL file inside the folder. Any problems, just upload the folder & I'll do it for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have made the dll successfully. But when I put the dll into the /Windows folder in my Samsung Focus, nothing happened even after a reboot.
And another interesting thing is in WP7 Root Tools, when exploring the /Windows folder, all single file has a "ROM Module" or "ROM File" written blew, but the files I moved in has nothing written under it.
I tried to check the usb mode in diagnosis *#7248#, still there are three options to choose, nothing new.
I personally don't see the future of this project for now.
However, You have done a lot to help, it's very kind of you, thank you so much!
marsrogers said:
I have made the dll successfully. But when I put the dll into the /Windows folder in my Samsung Focus, nothing happened even after a reboot.
And another interesting thing is in WP7 Root Tools, when exploring the /Windows folder, all single file has a "ROM Module" or "ROM File" written blew, but the files I moved in has nothing written under it.
I tried to check the usb mode in diagnosis *#7248#, still there are three options to choose, nothing new.
I personally don't see the future of this project for now.
However, You have done a lot to help, it's very kind of you, thank you so much!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It wouldn't have ROM FILE/MODULE under it as it wasn't cooked in. You probably need some registry for it to work. Also, try opening the DLL in PEexplorer & checking to see it it has a cert attached.
Example of a DLL/EXE with a cert;
Gonna cook it into my rom and try it out...Do you have an idea which reg entry it could need?
I think of something for the settings page. Because if you haven't got a settings page for it, how can you activate it?
And maybe another entry which points it to the DLL file...?
-WP7User- said:
Gonna cook it into my rom and try it out...Do you have an idea which reg entry it could need?
I think of something for the settings page. Because if you haven't got a settings page for it, how can you activate it?
And maybe another entry which points it to the DLL file...?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Next weekend I may upload the dcTNONE_ANALOGTV.dll folder which I found in the leaked ROM for HTC Surround even before the WP7 was officially to public, the source code which is .c and .def for it, which is to remove some limits for QSD8250 CPU, and the changeusbprofile.exe and changeusbprofile.xml from Asus E600 (the only dev phone has the display mirror feather in 7720 for now)someone Mr X, who I am very grateful to gave me.
I ain't major in this level of computing techs, so I think in order to make the project alive, it's better to share what I have to those who has the ability to do it. Let them holding in my hand is a great waste at present stage.
The QSD8250 is a very old cpu, so there should be no problem with NDA.
P.S
There should be a manual installed usb driver on PC and a client application on PC but I don't have them right now. If you have friends or friend's friend who is a dev, holding a e600 dev phone, try ask them to share something, appreciated.
drkfngthdragnlrd said:
It wouldn't have ROM FILE/MODULE under it as it wasn't cooked in. You probably need some registry for it to work. Also, try opening the DLL in PEexplorer & checking to see it it has a cert attached.
Example of a DLL/EXE with a cert;
http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m240/drkfngthdragnlrd/Untitled-31.png
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've uploaded all my files so you can make the check yourself.
After all I'm major in management not IT techniques so I don't want to pull the path down.
Thank You for the help you offered!~~~
Thanks for uploading your files. But it seems like I can't find the reg key...
There isn't a single reg entry which points to the uploaded .dll. At least not in the official Mango Update for the HD7.
But if you post the whole entry, I could try to cook the .dll into my rom and see what happens.
-WP7User- said:
Thanks for uploading your files. But it seems like I can't find the reg key...
There isn't a single reg entry which points to the uploaded .dll. At least not in the official Mango Update for the HD7.
But if you post the whole entry, I could try to cook the .dll into my rom and see what happens.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
has this registry something to do With that ? :
Local Machine\Drivers\Display\TV\
PanelDLL=string:"dcTNONE_ANALOGTV.dll"
-WP7User- said:
Thanks for uploading your files. But it seems like I can't find the reg key...
There isn't a single reg entry which points to the uploaded .dll. At least not in the official Mango Update for the HD7.
But if you post the whole entry, I could try to cook the .dll into my rom and see what happens.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just like @tessut posted. It's it. And I think you'd better try to build the dcTNONE_ANALOGTV.dll yourself from the source, it should be more reliable than using fixedRecmod. I can't do that cuz there seems to need many head files that do not exist in computer even I have vs2010...
Sent from my SGH-i937 using XDA Windows Phone 7 App
Okay, if someone wants to try that, too: The exact reg key (just copy and paste) is
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Drivers\Display\TV]
"PanelDLL"=string:"dcTNONE_ANALOGTV.dll"
Didn't flash the rom on my device yet, but that's soon going to happen
The dctNONE_analogtv.dll is in the windows folder, the changeusbprofile.exe and .xml are in there, too. I hope it works!
EDIT: Didn't work at all...The ChangeUSBProfile.exe didn't get installed (although I'm 100% sure that it is there and of course in the right folder). Wasn't there a license xml around or something? Because normally a Windows Phone 7 App needs a license file to get installed when starting the phone for the first time. Don't know if this applies to .exe files though.
Has someone got an idea?
-WP7User- said:
EDIT: Didn't work at all...The ChangeUSBProfile.exe didn't get installed (although I'm 100% sure that it is there and of course in the right folder). Wasn't there a license xml around or something? Because normally a Windows Phone 7 App needs a license file to get installed when starting the phone for the first time. Don't know if this applies to .exe files though.
Has someone got an idea?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the work! Is it possible if we extract the official .cab update file to get a licence and patch it to the exe?
I used a PE Explorer to open the changusbprofile.exe and found a license called"Windows Mobile TCB signing cert" in it.
Another thing is I used a way to open .exe in IE (use IE in WP7 to open this thread and download the usbvideoout.zip and you can have the chance to open changeusbprofile.exe directly) but it failed in Mango. Maybe we should try this in 7004 because this is really an old file. Or we should find a .cab file that contains a exe file in it and this .cab must be announced after mango update.

Node js on windows RT

I don't have permission to post thread in the development related forums. Hopes someone can add it to http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2092348
I have ported nodejs(0.9.7-pre) to windows RT.
And here are some issues which will affect the performance:
1.Snapshot hasn't been used.
2. V8 uses some assembly code for arm, but it's just for linux and gcc.
So currently simulator is used when executing javascript code.
Awesome - this will come in handy for testing JS code while I'm away from my main machine. I believe someone was requesting Node.js on page 11 of the Desktop apps ported to Windows RT thread, but I cannot yet post their either.
I posted it in there for you.
Very nice! I think it's actually possible to get V8 running on RT - I've been working on it as part of porting Chromium - but it might be easier to just use the interpreter for now anyhow.
Added to the first post.
This actually works better than I ever imagined.
Even the crazy HTTPS-Stuff works pretty well (Client authentication).
No Need for V8 for my 20 lines of code anyway...
How did you get it to work, or how did you install it?
domenukk said:
This actually works better than I ever imagined.
Even the crazy HTTPS-Stuff works pretty well (Client authentication).
No Need for V8 for my 20 lines of code anyway...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got a Windows RT 8.1 Surface for a trip I am taking, but in my down time, I would like to run Node.js.
I downloaded the Zip file above, unzipped it in a folder.
doubleClicking on it throws this error:
"Windows cannot verify the digital signature for this file. A recent hardware or software change might ahve installed a file that is signed incorrectly or damaged, or that might be malicious software from an unknown source".
When I run node.exe from a command line I get:
"The system cannot execute the specified program."
I have turned off UAC. What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Tim
tteller said:
I got a Windows RT 8.1 Surface
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Tim
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You answered it yourself. You require the jailbreak to run this. RT 8.1 doesnt have a jailbreak.
Could be possible to get latest Node.js release compiled please?
Thanks!
jesuslg123 said:
Could be possible to get latest Node.js release compiled please?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Posted it in the RT Hacking forum

[Q] jailbreak rt 8.1,possible?

still wondering how to jailbreak rt 8.1,seems that cdb no more works..
A jailbreak for 8.1 isn't possible yet.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app that has now replied to millions of stupid questions
hjc4869 said:
still wondering how to jailbreak rt 8.1,seems that cdb no more works..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*sigh*. Use search, or even just open your eyes and read through the development and hacking section which is basically full of this single statement: "8.1 does not have a jailbreak yet"
SixSixSevenSeven said:
*sigh*. Use search, or even just open your eyes and read through the development and hacking section which is basically full of this single statement: "8.1 does not have a jailbreak yet"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Making a jailbreak is a complicated task. I'm working on it...
Melissa
surface rt 8.1 jailbreak
Myriachan said:
Making a jailbreak is a complicated task. I'm working on it...
Melissa
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hello my name is mike clery I was wondering any info on a 8.1 jailbreak I really want to install legacy apps on my surface rt so if you can tell me anything its December 26 and still no info on it
Dude. Don't pester the devs. Don't post questions that have already been asked and answered over and over again. Don't, ever, ask for ETAs or similar concerning hacks like this. Leaving aside the simple fact that it's impossible to predict anything of that nature (and thus asking is simply useless and annoying spam), people on here are volunteers doing this stuff in our own time. You are not our boss, to ask for regular status reports or some such thing. It'll be posted when it's ready. No point asking for anything else.
There has been plenty of discussion regarding an 8.1 jailbreak. I get that you're new, but time was, new members of a community had the courtesy to observe, and emulate, the behavior of the older members of the community. At a minimum, check the forum rules... the very first of which is: Search before posting!
cameyo ? work with jailbreakoen surface rt ????
Have you guys heard about cameyo ?????
Its pre pacakge apps taht dont need to be installed to run.
download them and run them, wonder if we be able to use those apps after the RT is jailbroken? any idea ?
search for online . cameyo . com / public - (no spaces)
here is the link to hugh list of apps that can be downloaded as n exe file and run on any PC, offcourse not on rt . i tried. Anyone with a 8.0 surface RT jailbroken devce, wanna try and let us know if they are working ?
MrAsimOnline said:
Have you guys heard about cameyo ?????
Its pre pacakge apps taht dont need to be installed to run.
download them and run them, wonder if we be able to use those apps after the RT is jailbroken? any idea ?
search for online . cameyo . com / public - (no spaces)
here is the link to hugh list of apps that can be downloaded as n exe file and run on any PC, offcourse not on rt . i tried. Anyone with a 8.0 surface RT jailbroken devce, wanna try and let us know if they are working ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope. Cameyo is for x86 not ARM and would need porting, as it is not open source that is not possible.
Possible alternitve?
Is is possible to just get a developer license on an rt device and then use your own signing certificate to sign some application (like audacity) then import the certificate into the trusted root authority list using certmgr.msc? If that worked then we could get something going that would work with few risk of problems. Also for anyone else who might find this useful, you can download a windows rt debugger and it has a built In kernel debugger (maybe could be used to jailbreak???).
... And we come full circle. @johndc7, thanks for your suggestion but did you really think that wasn't among the very first things we tried?
The requirement isn't that the binaries are signed. It's that they're signed by Microsoft. Your suggestion does actually work if the tablet is in Testsigning mode - which means, basically, treat any trusted signature as if it's a MS signature - but putting the tablet in Testsigning mode requires editing the BCD (Boot Configuration Database) and the SecureBoot feature prevents any modification to the SecureBoot flag in the BCD. We even have tried complex steps like exporting the BCD, enabling Testsigning on it, marking it read-only, and re-importing it. No dice. Feel free to experiment more yourself, though...
Oh, and as for kernel debug, that's definitely another way to disable the signature enforcement... and it's just as unusable as your last suggestion. Secure Boot blocks the Debug flags in the BCD. You don't need any special software to perform kernel debugging of RT - any build of kdb or windbg from the last few years can do it - but you do need to be able to put the tablet in debug mode to begin with. Again, if you find a way to do *that*, then that would be very valuable.
Another idea........
Hopefully this is something that is actually somewhat realistic..... I have been wanting to run audacity (mainly) on windows rt. Does anyone know if it would be possible to recompile it to run full screen in metro? Even though this method isn't really ideal, it would be something to temporally use instead of having nothing until somebody finds a better way of doing it. I understand that it probably wouldn't be able to be released to the windows store but a developer license could be installed to run it.
Well, at a bare minimum, you would need to re-write the entire UI. Metro apps don't (can't) use the standard Windows GUI frameworks, so any graphical app that isn't completely DirectX-based (which is to say, pretty much anything except games and command-line apps) will need to have their interface re-written.
Then there's the issue of things like getting it to work within the sandbox (you can largely work around the API restrictions, but the privileges issue is a problem) and, unless it is already possible to compile it under modern versions of Visual Studio (a lot of open-source software isn't), you would need to fix it for MSVC compatibility too.
Short version: Not practically.
Possible Alternative
I did find a folder on my RT device called "CodeIntegrity". The path is "C:/Windows/System32/CodeIntegrity". It contains drivers and stl files that I assume prevent the use of unsigned exes. Permissions that are not normally granted on the Surface are needed to disable the files, but if we could somehow do it maybe it would solve the problem?
GoodDayToDie said:
The requirement isn't that the binaries are signed. It's that they're signed by Microsoft.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not exactly. They can be signed by any certificate listed in the kek or db and not listed in the dbx. So microsoft (though there are different signatures in rt 8.0 and rt 8.1) and the OEM, and any third party that made drivers that are used on the platform (at least in general). But those are just technical details and don't help find a solution all that much.

Categories

Resources