Doc`s FROYO XXJPO with Dena Theme and new setting icons
here is docs froyo rom for xxjpo
integratet dena theme and new setting icons
i tested it and it works for me
http://www.multiupload.com/1LX2N9ZMJN
This is doc s rom 7.6.2 with dena theme in it an new setting icons
For all of the users it is only changed the theme and setting icons all other is the same how docs rom 7.6.2 xxjpo
have fun !!!!!!
photos please...
Poor Doc...
dupel said:
Poor Doc...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol.. This is insane..
why are you doing this?
kalpik said:
Lol.. This is insane..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doc ought to RIG his code for this NOT to happen.
Why are you reposting someone else's rom whose thread is like 5 links above yours?
What is wrong with you?
Yeah, just release the theme. Entire ROM is insane in the membrain ~P
USE THIS AT YOUR OWN RISK. THIS THEME OR ROM IS IN NO WAY CONNECTED TO DOCS OFFICIAL ROM.
THIS IS NOT TO BE TRUSTED, AND NO SUPPORT WILL BE GIVEN TO USERS OF THIS THREAD. THE END.
Sent live and direct from my SGS GT-I9000, England, UK
Well maybe it would be nice for beginners not to have to change the theme themselves.
On the other hand, maybe it would be a little bit dangerous for complete nOObs to be messing around with firmwares....
ragin said:
Doc ought to RIG his code for this NOT to happen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The whole point of open source is to share and improve, no?
It's not like he's saying this is his own work - his title even says Doc.
snapper.fishes said:
The whole point of open source is to share and improve, no?
It's not like he's saying this is his own work - his title even says Doc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I agree with the open source comment, but this is very misleading and unclear. There are no credits or any other important information to avoid confusion. For a start the title says DOC...therefore users would automatically think its directly from doc, when this is not the case. And secondly the paste should create a different title and then post the necessary details in the thread.
Sent live and direct from my SGS GT-I9000, England, UK
pele78 said:
Yes I agree with the open source comment, but this is very misleading and unclear. There are no credits or any other important information to avoid confusion. For a start the title says DOC...therefore users would automatically think its directly from doc, when this is not the case. And secondly the paste should create a different title and then post the necessary details in the thread.
Sent live and direct from my SGS GT-I9000, England, UK
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But that's a mistake, something that can be fixed easily by adding a few extra lines in the title. However, some member seems to have it wrapped around their head that no one else should be allowed to modify Doc's ROM and release a different version of it (Yes, I am pointing my finger at SOMEONE).
snapper.fishes said:
But that's a mistake, something that can be fixed easily by adding a few extra lines in the title. However, some member seems to have it wrapped around their head that no one else should be allowed to modify Doc's ROM and release a different version of it (Yes, I am pointing my finger at SOMEONE).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
then the poster should edit that asap. I am all for open source - Beauty comes with freedom.
But my main point is... if there is something wrong with this rom along with the title...is the poster going to accept responsibility and provide advice and assistance ? or will the users of this misleading thread rush across and spam for help.. and again who would help ? Cause i damn sure wont because for one..i dont even know what this rom consists of, what is inside, and features and so on..
that is my main argument... the poster should make it clear and not misleading... or its gonna cause problems mainly for users when supposedly phones start getting bricked etc..
where is all the break down of details in the first post... jesus!
snapper.fishes said:
But that's a mistake, something that can be fixed easily by adding a few extra lines in the title. However, some member seems to have it wrapped around their head that no one else should be allowed to modify Doc's ROM and release a different version of it (Yes, I am pointing my finger at SOMEONE).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The open source doesn't mean you can fix someone's effort without his permission. Maybe Pepi just want to make this ROM better, but please don't use the product number 7.6.2.1 , it was very easy to let user confusing the vendor of ROM.
please put more info, credit listing and all that in the first post.
also, please ask doc / kalpik and whoever is involved in your "remake" of the rom for permissions before proceeding, it's just good gesture.
snapper.fishes said:
But that's a mistake, something that can be fixed easily by adding a few extra lines in the title. However, some member seems to have it wrapped around their head that no one else should be allowed to modify Doc's ROM and release a different version of it (Yes, I am pointing my finger at SOMEONE).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're pointing at me, you don't know what my argument is.. I am all for opensource.. But creating 10000001 same ROMs just by changing theme and keyboards absolutely makes no sense, and serves to just fragment the users/help/issues/support/bugs etc.. Just because you *can* do something doesn't mean you *should*..
kalpik said:
If you're pointing at me, you don't know what my argument is.. I am all for opensource.. But creating 10000001 same ROMs just by changing theme and keyboards absolutely makes no sense, and serves to just fragment the users/help/issues/support/bugs etc.. Just because you *can* do something doesn't mean you *should*..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry Kalpik. I didn't mean you at all. My apologies if I caused any bad feelings.
I am just annoyed at some users who seem to have a habit of walking into every single thread that's about a modification of Doc's rom and telling the developer to basically stop whatever him/her is doing. Argue, yes, discuss yes, but don't just drop a line or two telling the developer to stop.
No need for sorry mate, basically no one wants anyone to have spent few hundred of whatever currency on a super dupa SGS, and just end up bricking there bundle of joy because of someones error, ignorance or whatever..
Related
What does the number of Referrals in user profile statistics mean?
vichet007 said:
What does the number of Referrals in user profile statistics mean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can either, create a referrals URL, so that you give this to your friends, and they join via the URL and you get a referral.
Or
When registering (I'm told) there is a field to enter the name of an existing member who referred you to this site.
Dave
I've wondered about that too.
Thanks for clearing it up.
DaveShaw said:
You can either, create a referrals URL, so that you give this to your friends, and they join via the URL and you get a referral.
Or
When registering (I'm told) there is a field to enter the name of an existing member who referred you to this site.
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I still have absolutely no idea as to how I have come to have four of them Don't suppose there's a way to see who I referred?
ben_duder said:
I still have absolutely no idea as to how I have come to have four of them Don't suppose there's a way to see who I referred?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not in the Mod CP, maybe your posts inspired someone to join, remember a lot of people only join to download attachments .
DaveShaw said:
Not in the Mod CP, maybe your posts inspired someone to join, remember a lot of people only join to download attachments .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha yeah, I doubt my contributions have encouraged them to though
ben_duder said:
Haha yeah, I doubt my contributions have encouraged them to though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Surely 1 of the 609 must be worth something...
Now time to scour my 7000 for something worth while
DaveShaw said:
Surely 1 of the 609 must be worth something...
Now time to scour my 7000 for something worth while
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'd be surprised I tend to be less helpful when I try to be, so maybe I should just flame my way to the big 1000
PS: If you're not too busy, can you mention to the powers that be the idea of having your phone, ROM and radio in your username bar (the thing to the left of each post - don't know what it's called...). It was mentioned in this thread as it went a little off topic in the second page, but it seems to have fizzled out a bit.
I think it would be a very useful idea as a lot of support threads ask for such information and quite a lot of users would rather not keep it in their signatures. It also standardises the layout of such things so you can quickly check which phone/ROM/whatever the user is talking about.
I suppose the issues would arise when someone has more than two or three phones as it would make the posts longer, but even then it wouldn't get so bad until it hit around five devices, as it's just two or three lines for each one. Maybe a drop-down box could be used for the device and we could recommend only including primary devices in that, while keeping older ones for your signature only.
ben_duder said:
You'd be surprised I tend to be less helpful when I try to be, so maybe I should just flame my way to the big 1000
PS: If you're not too busy, can you mention to the powers that be the idea of having your phone, ROM and radio in your username bar (the thing to the left of each post - don't know what it's called...). It was mentioned in this thread as it went a little off topic in the second page, but it seems to have fizzled out a bit.
I think it would be a very useful idea as a lot of support threads ask for such information and quite a lot of users would rather not keep it in their signatures. It also standardises the layout of such things so you can quickly check which phone/ROM/whatever the user is talking about.
I suppose the issues would arise when someone has more than two or three phones as it would make the posts longer, but even then it wouldn't get so bad until it hit around five devices, as it's just two or three lines for each one. Maybe a drop-down box could be used for the device and we could recommend only including primary devices in that, while keeping older ones for your signature only.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It has already been suggested by some other mods, I can't recall who .
Okay, cool. Thanks!
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
Thanks for explanation Dave. Got it now.
DaveShaw said:
You can either, create a referrals URL, so that you give this to your friends, and they join via the URL and you get a referral.
Or
When registering (I'm told) there is a field to enter the name of an existing member who referred you to this site.
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could have sworn that at one point I'd been able to see who my referred sign-ups were, but I can't for the life of me find it now.
I've got 24, and although that's not a lot I'm a bit stumped as to how!
Is there a way to see who has signed up due to my referrals?
johncmolyneux said:
I could have sworn that at one point I'd been able to see who my referred sign-ups were, but I can't for the life of me find it now.
I've got 24, and although that's not a lot I'm a bit stumped as to how!
Is there a way to see who has signed up due to my referrals?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think that is something you can see yourself.
pulser_g2 said:
I don't think that is something you can see yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Poo. Ah well, cheers mate
Old thread, but wanted to post the method for creating a referrals URL since Dave's link above did not work..
http://forum.xda-developers.com/register.php?referrerid=4238197 <- replace this number with your user ID number
To find your user ID number, click on your user name in the upper right hand corner and see the new URL change in your location bar. Here is mine. Note the u= on the end.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/member.php?u=4238197
Referrals doesn't seem to do anything, but it is nice to know that I inspired someone to join up and hopefully contribute.
Hi this rom has got a couple of sense apps but more vaniila i like this rom alot it took me a couple of hours of making it and i think its brilliant
FULLY WORKING
I am not responsible for you messing up your phone
MEDIAFIRE:http://www.mediafire.com/?yfmmayymnij
I dont take donations i do this for fun but donations will be nice =P can any one help me make one
if there is anything u need i can help u just send me a message
includes:
LAUNCHER PRO
MUSIC APP (SENSE) <-- u got to love it
HTC IME (HACKED) THX xda
WIRELESS TETHER
ITS TO FAST AND I MEAN IT
OMG I FORGOT THE REST
OH YEAH REMEMBER NANDROID BACKUP OR BART IS NECESSARY
INSTALL:
wipe everything
flash vanisense 1.0
reboot
reboot again
thx to xenoside (Awsome developer),Cyanogen (helping xenoside),feeyo (for cronas 2.0)
ddotpatel said:
Bruv, keep your head up, don't let the critics bomb you out.
To all the naysayers, give the guy a break... Looks like the OP made some mistakes and started off on the wrong foot, but he has complied with with Feeyo's original request hasn't he?
.... and its abit harsh to first say
...then switch to.....
... the poor guys doesn't know where the hell he stands. Give him some pointers,... let him know where to go next and what changes to make. I'm sure he'l appreciate constructive criticism.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THANK YOU !!!
thx i am a new developer and please give me some pointers
please rate thx
maxismaIM SORRY REALLY SORRY ITS JUST THAT I THOUGHT THATS HOW EVERYONE ELSE MAKES ROMS =(
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=667298
Mod Edit: Post removed, show respect to other members, take a note of: 2. Member conduct. take that as a warning.
asad510 said:
XXXX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reported. No need to be rude.
Your ROM is simply another ROM with added/removed APKs.
You don't need to spam this forum with a dozen of "ROM" threads, it's annoying.
Learn a bit more about Android and then try modifying sources etc.
Or if you desire, port a ROM from another device.
But don't just republish ROMs with just APKs removed or added.. That's just not useful as everybody can just download those APKs from the Market.
maxisma said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=667298
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 :$
Yeah, please stop spamming this forum... At least three threads about your (non-)ROM, this is just a mess.
Can you just stick to one thread for all your 'ROM' updates please. Thanks.
EDITED: BTW, what's an ultra ROM?
Supper rom? (Evening meal Rom) Nice!
really fast
Hi
I am new in this site. I am using HTC TP2 T7373 Window mobile 6.1. I would like to install android in my sd. What after what I have to do? What and from where I have to download? I will be greatfull if any one instruct me in details.
Thanks
Please read http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=980079
Or http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=951962
helicopter88 said:
Please read http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=980079
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That freakin thread is so confusing, I don't see how it's easier than mine...
[BUILD] **Complete Froyo Bundle!!** FRX06 - "Stable" - Minor Fixes - get it straight from the horses mouth!
That other thread covers a lot of other topics, which isn't bad... it's just kinda confusing IMHO!
arrrghhh said:
That freakin thread is so confusing, I don't see how it's easier than mine...
[BUILD] **Complete Froyo Bundle!!** FRX06 - "Stable" - Minor Fixes - get it straight from the horses mouth!
That other thread covers a lot of other topics, which isn't bad... it's just kinda confusing IMHO!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Confusing? heh ;P
It offers an introduction as well as install instructions and troubleshooting and basic pc connectivity.
ryannathans said:
Confusing? heh ;P
It offers an introduction as well as install instructions and troubleshooting and basic pc connectivity.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but my thread is very to-the-point. Not saying your thread is useless, just not the first thing a newbie should see IMHO. Once they work thru my thread, yours would be a good one to look at... assuming they actually read my thread or yours at all.
This isn't a thread battle,and Arrrghhh,i've not suggested your thread because your thread isn't for newbies and covers less topics
But i'll add it to my post
Is it possible to install a full blown rooted Android rom on the Rhodium? Thanks
arrrghhh said:
Yes, but my thread is very to-the-point. Not saying your thread is useless, just not the first thing a newbie should see IMHO. Once they work thru my thread, yours would be a good one to look at... assuming they actually read my thread or yours at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wasn't particularly eager to install xdandroid (even though I was excited about the concept) until I read ryannathans' thread. Granted it isn't organized well, but it doesn't assume knowledge that isn't there, which makes it ideal for the type of noob that will read.
Waynehead69 said:
Is it possible to install a full blown rooted Android rom on the Rhodium? Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both XDAndroid builds are rooted - do you mean replacing WinMo? It's possible, but not stable. Doesn't play nice at all with GSM devices, and it's not easy/simple on CDMA ones.
See
NAND Testing - 05-25 Update: New LK, Recovery.img, Kernel Updates through Recovery if you want to know moar.
fortunz said:
I wasn't particularly eager to install xdandroid (even though I was excited about the concept) until I read ryannathans' thread. Granted it isn't organized well, but it doesn't assume knowledge that isn't there, which makes it ideal for the type of noob that will read.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there something I should add to mine? I'm always open to suggestion, if you feel my first post is missing something that's essential, please do tell
arrrghhh said:
Is there something I should add to mine? I'm always open to suggestion, if you feel my first post is missing something that's essential, please do tell
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see the point, everything I needed was in ryan's thread. They serve different purposes. You seem to mostly be focused on FRX06, getting people onto that entry level stable build. You mention kernels and the new rootfs in your thread, leaving someone like me to wonder WTF is a rootfs and kernel? Ryan fills in the blanks and focuses on getting people who don't know squat to FRX6.5, and gives us just enough info to understand the threads he links to. There's no reason for you to duplicate that.
Hi guys,
Who can help me with a mod(pack) consist from: battery percentage(green circle with discontinued line)+crt effect+AOSP lockscreen+green notification+APM.
For several days i'm looking for such pack, a clean pack, not for i don't know which custom rom. This features could be also in different packages, it's not a must to be all in one. I need this things for deodexed KH3.
If somebody knows something, please let me know!
I had a look to JKay, but frankly speaking, when i was redirected to the download page, i didn't understood very well. No offense for the developers, but could be more organized. At least for the novices.
Also i've sought other mod's, but they use other fonts or icons, etc and i want something "clean" , only with this stuff's.
I know that out there, there are a lot of guys who has the same desire like me in which regard this mod's for SGS II
Thanks in advance!
"I had a look to JKay, but frankly speaking, when i was redirected to the download page, i didn't understood nothing."
So you understood everything on the developers website, thats the problem with double negatives, they kinda confuse things
yusuo said:
"I had a look to JKay, but frankly speaking, when i was redirected to the download page, i didn't understood nothing."
So you understood everything on the developers website, thats the problem with double negatives, they kinda confuse things
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok dude... I've corrected my phrase. English is not my native language and it can happen to have mistakes My bad. Anyway, wasn't necessary to be so ironic with me regarding that point. That was my remark, my point of view....
Hello dear Rom Cooks
Its just annoying that every ROM cook use different location for (as example) the bootanimation
So i want to make an appeal, that we make a standard for some things!
For bootanimation, why we don't use simply:
System/media/bootloader
So, please, use this Thread as a meeting place to make a standard. If anyone got more Ideas, just Post it.
i gonna make an answer, where i put in the results from the "meetings"
AND:
Please don't miss understand me: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=27689705&postcount=5
Greetings
aivilon
reserved
Reserved for the standards
just my opinion...but don't you think developers have enough issues to worry about when creating their roms? why add another thing to do on their list and create standards for them?
Not trying to cause an argument, but I think people who do this in their spare time shouldn't be confined to a "standard"
by the way htc's standard for boot animation is system/customize/resource.
so, that should be the standard. but I believe the user should just ask the dev what folder things are in in their forum if they cannot figure it out on their own.
kish3n said:
just my opinion...but don't you think developers have enough issues to worry about when creating their roms? why add another thing to do on their list and create standards for them?
Not trying to cause an argument, but I think people who do this in their spare time shouldn't be confined to a "standard"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't want to bind them on a standard. Just think it would be easyer. I agree that they have much other problems and i don't want to critizise their work.
Seems Like a Good Idea.Why don’t we give this a try?
maybe a cook find some other things, which would be able to standardize
toolhas4degrees said:
by the way htc's standard for boot animation is system/customize/resource.
so, that should be the standard. but I believe the user should just ask the dev what folder things are in in their forum if they cannot figure it out on their own.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course this is a possible variant. BUT:
I think every one would agree, that in a thread which is about 8000 sites, no one would read anything and find the correct path. And much people don't use the thread search bar. So with one ROM, many people would ask the same. And when it works, and we could create "a standard" for things like this, its possible to make a sticky, so everyone can go there and watch, where which datas are.
And by the way: i tried this phath wigh ARHD but the zip file (the bootanimation) don't works... i had to take a app.
There are just 2 place where you can find bootanimation.zip in HTC ROMs
/data/local/bootanimation.zip
/system/customize/resources/bootanimation.zip
So...2 places, not much I think. First place is common for custom ROMs, 2nd place is common for stock ROMs.
kish3n said:
just my opinion...but don't you think developers have enough issues to worry about when creating their roms? why add another thing to do on their list and create standards for them?
Not trying to cause an argument, but I think people who do this in their spare time shouldn't be confined to a "standard"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 I would rather the Devs focus more on increasing the performance etc... on our phones as they do already rather than messing around standardising the location of bootanimations. All Devs produce different work and if they were all the same it would be pointless much like this thread is.
EDIT: Also I understand the thinking behind posting this in the Development section however a discussion like this really belongs in General
mike1986. said:
There are just 2 place where you can find bootanimation.zip in HTC ROMs
/data/local/bootanimation.zip
/system/customize/resources/bootanimation.zip
So...2 places, not much I think. First place is common for custom ROMs, 2nd place is common for stock ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
If you previously had a HTC device and prefer running custom Sense ROMs, you would know what Mike has pointed out.
All you need do to find the bootanimation.zip is just open the ROM zip with your choice of archiver 7Zip or WinRAR and search the folders and replace it with your choice of bootanimation, that is if you wana change the animation.
As for your suggestion regarding where to place the bootanimation, why do you want to re-invent the wheel, if that is where you would prefer it, cook a ROM and put it there.
I'm happy where it is and know where to find it if i wana change it, i prefer to have my phone in a booted state, i mean c'mon how many times a day are you gona boot and reboot your phone?
dr9722 said:
standardising the location of bootanimations
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont think just about that!
dr9722 said:
EDIT: Also I understand the thinking behind posting this in the Development section however a discussion like this really belongs in General
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The idea to post it here was, because i reach here the devs more than in the genaral
dr9722 said:
All Devs produce different work and if they were all the same it would be pointless much like this thread is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nopa. I dont write about that all devs must make the same. a work is characterized by tweaks, gui, perfomance etc etc etc. not by the folders. so i I have to disagree with you
Moved to general, since the dev forum is not the right place for this.