Related
Alright. I have been looking over some of the supposed fixes and features that are to come with 2.2. The thing is though, I have noticed that these things are already available on the Desire. Increased Ram, Flash 10.1, and a few other things. I know the Desire is running 2.1... but why does it seem to have the features 2.2 is said to bring? Has anyone else noticed this or found it a bit odd?
Whiterin said:
Alright. I have been looking over some of the supposed fixes and features that are to come with 2.2. The thing is though, I have noticed that these things are already available on the Desire. Increased Ram, Flash 10.1, and a few other things. I know the Desire is running 2.1... but why does it seem to have the features 2.2 is said to bring? Has anyone else noticed this or found it a bit odd?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the desire doesn't have very good flash implementation 10.1 is suppose to bring flawless flash which could possibly be GPU accelerated at the moment. at the moment flash on the desire and legend is flash lite and is 100% software based (ie no acceleration)
more ram i assume means more available as in 2.2 has a smaller memory imprint add that and JIT compiler and we are in for a big performance boost on all current 2.1 devices (provided an update is supplied)
the desire doesn't have flash 10.1, it has flash lite.
What I am talking about with the Ram is that supposedly when 2.2 comes out, the phones that currently have 512mb of Ram will have 576, the same as the Desire has. The Desire also has FM radio, and some other things 2.2 is meant to bring. That's why I thought maybe there were some 2.2 features on the Desire now. Since the Desire already has some of these features, what will 2.2 mean for it? Does the Desire have the extra ram because of the kernal/rom it uses, or because it physically has the extra Ram? If it physically has the extra, does that mean 2.2 will increase the Ram on the Desire as well?
noobdeagle said:
the desire doesn't have very good flash implementation 10.1 is suppose to bring flawless flash which could possibly be GPU accelerated at the moment. at the moment flash on the desire and legend is flash lite and is 100% software based (ie no acceleration)
more ram i assume means more available as in 2.2 has a smaller memory imprint add that and JIT compiler and we are in for a big performance boost on all current 2.1 devices (provided an update is supplied)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If not supplied, we will hack it
Say a phone running 2.1 , has 512mb of ram, not all of that ram is available as say 200mb is used by android 2.1,
the 2.2 basically means instead of using the 200mb that 2.1 uses, it will use 150mb, therefore freeing up 50mb of ram.
2.2 is also ment to have JIT (just in time), apparently apps will be 3x faster and use less battery
i hope that htc release their sense quite soon after the froyo is out cause i LOVE it. i wonder why some people are trying to vanish it off their phones. i didn't find something that the stock android can do better than the sense does. anyway i just hope froyo to be ported to desire soon!!!
Phil750123 said:
Say a phone running 2.1 , has 512mb of ram, not all of that ram is available as say 200mb is used by android 2.1,
the 2.2 basically means instead of using the 200mb that 2.1 uses, it will use 150mb, therefore freeing up 50mb of ram.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get that much, but I find it odd that the Desire has 576 while all the other new phone have 512, and with 2.2 the other phones are supposed to have the same amount of Ram as the Desire. Don't most of the new HTC phones have basically the same hardware and Android version? What it is about the Desire that makes it have more Ram then the other phones, and when 2.2 comes out, will the Desire also get a boost in Ram, or will it stay at 576?
Also, I may sound a little out of the loop here, but what exactly is JIT meant to do?
As for Sense UI. I really like some of the HTC Widgets, but I was looking forward to the new Drawer feature in 2.1 as well as the unlock screen... I love the Desire, and I am slowly getting used to the Launch bar at the bottom... but the lock screen on the Desire is awefull. I would really have preferred the normal 2.1 unlock screen. I know you can root it and change it, but I would rather not root my phone. I also know you can download Helix or whatever it is called and have the Drawer launcher, but my HTC Widgets don't work with it and Sense is still open in the background using up Ram.
Whiterin said:
I get that much, but I find it odd that the Desire has 576 while all the other new phone have 512, and with 2.2 the other phones are supposed to have the same amount of Ram as the Desire. Don't most of the new HTC phones have basically the same hardware and Android version? What it is about the Desire that makes it have more Ram then the other phones, and when 2.2 comes out, will the Desire also get a boost in Ram, or will it stay at 576?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you're getting a little bit confused here. RAM is the physical amount of memory the device has. The desire has 576MB on a chip. The Nexus One, for example, has 512MB, also on a chip.
No software update is going to change that. The only thing the software update can do is to make the RAM usage more efficient, meaning the device will have more available RAM, as mentioned above.
But they'll still have the exact same amount of total RAM as they did before the update.
tuatha said:
I think you're getting a little bit confused here. RAM is the physical amount of memory the device has. The desire has 576MB on a chip. The Nexus One, for example, has 512MB, also on a chip.
No software update is going to change that. The only thing the software update can do is to make the RAM usage more efficient, meaning the device will have more available RAM, as mentioned above.
But they'll still have the exact same amount of total RAM as they did before the update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know how Ram works. I am asking why is the amount of Ram on the Desire currently higher then other new phones. I mean the actual ram allotted and usable. Does the Desire physically have more Ram, or is there something about the Rom or Kernal version that is letting it have more usable memory? Seems like you're saying the actual physical RAM is higher. Which still leaves the question of whether or not the Desire will have more usable memory when 2.2 hits. From reading around on the internet, 2.2 is supposed to up the usable memory on some of the newer devices (Nexus One and possibly Incredible) because it is based off of a newer Kernal. So if the Desire has more physical memory then the other devices, and the new Kernal is able to free up more of it to be usable... it would be logical to assume that the Desire will get an increase of the usable memory. If there is something about the current Rom or Kernal on the Desire that allows for more usable memory, but it has the same amount of memory as say, the Nexus one... then they should be even when 2.2 hits. Which one of those will happen is what I am wondering if anyone knows.
Yes, it physically has more RAM than the Nexus One. A total of 576MB of physical RAM. So yes, it should logically follow that it will also have more available RAM after the update (provided both are running identical software versions).
But in all honesty, we don't even have a confirmed feature list for FroYo yet. It's 90% guess-work right now (albeit educated guesses).
Plus we don't know what HTC's updated Sense will be like or how much RAM it will require. It's completely impossible to answer that with any certainty.
tuatha said:
Yes, it physically has more RAM than the Nexus One. A total of 576MB of physical RAM. So yes, it should logically follow that it will also have more available RAM after the update (provided both are running identical software versions).
But in all honesty, we don't even have a confirmed feature list for FroYo yet. It's 90% guess-work right now (albeit educated guesses).
Plus we don't know what HTC's updated Sense will be like or how much RAM it will require. It's completely impossible to answer that with any certainty.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I have just seen a few places saying the Nexus One as well as other phones that currently have 512 RAM should have 576 available in 2.2. Like you said though, most of it is guess work, so hard to tell how accurate that is. Hopefully in 2.2 they will let you change the launch bar and the drawer to the 3D scrolling one. Also hope they change the lock screen. Anyways, thanks for the replies everyone.
Whiterin said:
Yeah, I have just seen a few places saying the Nexus One as well as other phones that currently have 512 RAM should have 576 available in 2.2. Like you said though, most of it is guess work, so hard to tell how accurate that is. Hopefully in 2.2 they will let you change the launch bar and the drawer to the 3D scrolling one. Also hope they change the lock screen. Anyways, thanks for the replies everyone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see how that's possible re: upping the N1's memory. Unless it already has 576MB of physical RAM, only 512MB of which is active. Which seems incredibly unlikely.
Unless somebody knows differently, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that whoever said that was either misinformed or a liar
I'm no expert though, so I could be wrong.
Whiterin said:
Yeah, I have just seen a few places saying the Nexus One as well as other phones that currently have 512 RAM should have 576 available in 2.2. Like you said though, most of it is guess work, so hard to tell how accurate that is. Hopefully in 2.2 they will let you change the launch bar and the drawer to the 3D scrolling one. Also hope they change the lock screen. Anyways, thanks for the replies everyone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's impossible. The Nexus One was released with 512MB and no update will increase that amount.
Hmm, perhaps it was a mistake from whoever wrote the article then.
is there a possibility that the nexus 1 does have a 576 chip in it? I understand on the spec sheet it says 512mb, but seeing how the desire and nexus are the same device packaged differently, it wouldn't surprise me if there is an extra 64mb of RAM not currently being used.
It would be great for some one who really knows to actually confirm that the nexus really only has 512mb inside.
Why would it not have 64mb less? It's not like the Desire has an actual extra mic. And it has an optical trackpad. There are differences, just like the RAM.
And most importantly, why wouldn't the specs say it has 64mb extra. And why not use those 64mb extra? It seems to me it would be quite stupid not to mention ánd use it when it's actually in the device.
Ramedge said:
is there a possibility that the nexus 1 does have a 576 chip in it? I understand on the spec sheet it says 512mb, but seeing how the desire and nexus are the same device packaged differently, it wouldn't surprise me if there is an extra 64mb of RAM not currently being used.
It would be great for some one who really knows to actually confirm that the nexus really only has 512mb inside.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it definitley only has 512MB of ram, why wouldn't they enable the extra 64MB? They are similar devices but by no means the exact same.
Why would it not have 64mb less? It's not like the Desire has an actual extra mic. And it has an optical trackpad. There are differences, just like the RAM.
And most importantly, why wouldn't the specs say it has 64mb extra. And why not use those 64mb extra? It seems to me it would be quite stupid not to mention ánd use it when it's actually in the device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well Google/HTC are stupid then aren't they. they didn't mention the nexus ones FM radio capability, HTC forgot to mention the Desires wireless N radio. from a production point of view its easier to keep the PCBs the same with the same chips, peripherals like track pads and microphones are easy to add/remove.
it honestly wouldn't surprise me, from experience. this is why I want some one to really confirm this.
Hello,
Why isnt it possible to use SDCRAM as sort of RAM in android? same as VISA/7 Using ReadyBoost to expand the ram with an USB disk on keys?
thanks!
Why would you want that?
since you only use flash based memory anyway: that's called swaping
And is Swap enabled in all froyo roms today?
rommark said:
And is Swap enabled in all froyo roms today?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But why would you need it? You have 512MB of RAM, with a clean boot you have around 200-220MB of it free for whatever you want to do with it. Not enough for you?
martino2k6 said:
But why would you need it? You have 512MB of RAM, with a clean boot you have around 200-220MB of it free for whatever you want to do with it. Not enough for you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
won't heavy 3d games eat that?
rommark said:
won't heavy 3d games eat that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Smartphones =/= PCs. And if you are really out of space for a short amount of time, unneeded processes get killed automatically. Swap was only really needed on the G1 but definitely not on the Desire.
rommark said:
won't heavy 3d games eat that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, that's a bit too much even for a game... unless the code has memory leaks. With so much RAM it'd make more sense to use ramdisk (but who knows for what good use)
martino2k6 said:
No, that's a bit too much even for a game... unless the code has memory leaks. With so much RAM it'd make more sense to use ramdisk (but who knows for what good use)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
RamDisk could be insane for 3d gaming as then the textures would have fast extraction means less delay in rendering....
What Readyboost is NOT
Hey folks. I've only recently discovered Readyboost as I'm primarily a Linux guy. I got all hot and bothered about it immediately as well as it is (despite Microsofts constant onslaught of horrific failures) an absolutely brilliant and elegant technology/idea.
HOWEVER!!!
Nearly everyone is confused about what RB actually does, so I thought I'd take a minute to explain.
ReadyBoost is NOT swap. NOT SWAP!, not swap.
Swap is not something to get excited about, it is a last resort for when you're out of RAM and it's excruciatingly slow. In the land of IT, one of the first things we check for when a server is experiencing horrible performance, is "IS THIS MACHINE SWAPPING". Everyone's gotta learn that swap, while it is more useful than "not enough memory" it is nor more useful than utilizing the memory you already have, and it will always result in poor performance.
ReadyBoost is an additional disc cache for small, non-sequential reads/writes. It works with your existing FS cache but is faster in some cases because FLASH has a much lower seek time. Most FLASH chips have a seek time of <1ms while most rotational discs have a seek time of around 8ms. This adds up on a large number of small non-sequential r/w.
ReadyBoost takes any caching operations which fit it's strength profile (small, non-sequential) and offloads them to your FLASH device. This can increase load speed of some files/application dramatically (2-20x faster).
So, when someone asks you if they can use Readyboost because they don't have enough memory, please, take a moment to explain that RB is not swap, but is in fact a supplementary disc cache for small, non-sequential reads and writes.
That said, I haven't had time to dig into the question of whether or not RB would benefit Linux FS's.
I know this is a really old thread but I just wanted to put my two cents in. Memory boosting apps like ReadyBoost do have a viable purpose. That is keeping older hardware viable as minimum specs increase. There is an Android app that is equivilant to ReadyBoost called Roehsoft RAM Expander. There are mixed reviews for its performance but that is to be expected. If this app helps my aging 8227_Demo head unit work well enough for me to not replace it I will update this post.
Hello I had read about the problem of stalling. In the OCLF thread, I read that this is due to the RFS used.
BTW anyone can verify if this is still the problem in Android 2.2 build.
Thanks.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
dplate07 said:
Hello I had read about the problem of stalling. In the OCLF thread, I read that this is due to the RFS used.
BTW anyone can verify if this is still the problem in Android 2.2 build.
Thanks.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still rfs in the leaked froyo builds; no one can verify what the official build will be like, because it hasn't been released yet.
Seems pretty unlikely that samsung would consider a change in fs for the i9000 at this stage in it's development. I think manufacturers like to stick to their own proprietary fs...
This is the 1st and the last time I purchase a Samsung Phone Android, no matter what we do, still crapy slow. I start to hate this phone.... Android is cool but I9000 phone have the best hardware but the software suck....
halabibk said:
I start to hate this phone.... Android is cool but I9000 phone have the best hardware but the software suck....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No device is perfect. Most problems are fixable, I think. If Samsung doesn't do it, I'm sure the talented developers in this forum will do something - that's the beauty of Android..
the voodoo kernel puts the phone to rights. with that fix, its the fastest thing on the market.
it's just a shame only a small minority of users will see the benefit and the phone will ultimately fail because of this.
are you reading this samsung?
chrissyg123 said:
the voodoo kernel puts the phone to rights. with that fix, its the fastest thing on the market.
it's just a shame only a small minority of users will see the benefit and the phone will ultimately fail because of this.
are you reading this samsung?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, may I know what is the voodoo kernel? Can you please provide us with a link to the forum. Cheers.
chrissyg123 said:
the voodoo kernel puts the phone to rights. with that fix, its the fastest thing on the market.
it's just a shame only a small minority of users will see the benefit and the phone will ultimately fail because of this.
are you reading this samsung?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry to say that even the voodoo kernel starts to lag after a while. I don't know whats wrong with this phone but I'm never ever buying Samsung again, no matter how nice the specs are.
cavinsoo said:
Hi, may I know what is the voodoo kernel? Can you please provide us with a link to the forum. Cheers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
public beta 2 should come online within short time
f samsung...this is the first time in my years and years of using a mobile phone that i have to learn about filesystems and mobile phones.....lol
Disagree
kmrdeva said:
No device is perfect. Most problems are fixable, I think. If Samsung doesn't do it, I'm sure the talented developers in this forum will do something - that's the beauty of Android..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True that no device is perfect, but for the money we pay to purchase such a device, we expect a product that works out-of-the-box, which is not the case for the Galaxy S.
Compared to the hardware Samsung put into it, its shockingly laggy and other phones in the market with half the hardware specs dont show such lag due to the tweaked software they have
A mobile phone is not just a piece of hardware, its the hardware with its software that enables the optimum use of the hardware and also the accompanying PC software where Samsung has yet failed through the horribel "Kies"
I am a big fan of android, but Samsung has tarnished android through this ****ty product
This will be clearly seen once a pure android 2.2 OS (with no samsung software on top) is available for the SGS with the proper file system and memory manager
There are 2 problems with the phone.
1. File System
2. Memory
File system can be fix by using lag fix. After you implement lag fix, you feel phone is snappy and fast and you start running and install tons of apps.
This started the 2nd problem, even though is 512MB ram, most you get is 200Meg usable, however with some background service it reduces to 130 on average. After few hours of apps used or longer time the available memory can drop down to 30Meg. This is when you feel the 2nd lag. Even with 80Meg ram available you will still feel lag, and swype start behaving funny.
This can only be solve or temp fix (some people say you shouldn't) if you use softwares like ATK, SystemPanel Apps. (Just KILL THEM ALL) when you feel your phone start to slow down and your phone will than be alive!!!
The real fix for the memory issue.. unfortunately.. i believe we need a phone with minimum 6 to 700MB free RAM. Than you should feel the phone responsive all the time until all the apps start clogging up the usable RAM.
I understand where you're coming from, regarding this. However, being somewhat of a tech freak, I am quite happy that so many tweaks have been developed by the experts here in this forum - my Galaxy S works well enough for me, rooted and sped up with the one-click-lagfix app.
My experience so far with Android on the Galaxy S (shortcomings and all) has generally been way better than my previous experiences with S60v5 on the Nokia 5800 and N97.
kmrdeva said:
I understand where you're coming from, regarding this. However, being somewhat of a tech freak, I am quite happy that so many tweaks have been developed by the experts here in this forum - my Galaxy S works well enough for me, rooted and sped up with the one-click-lagfix app.
My experience so far with Android on the Galaxy S (shortcomings and all) has generally been way better than my previous experiences with S60v5 on the Nokia 5800 and N97.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am so so so so so so AGREE WITH YOU!!!!
Maybe that's why we appreciate the problems that comes with Android and SGS.
xtrememorph said:
There are 2 problems with the phone.
1. File System
2. Memory
File system can be fix by using lag fix. After you implement lag fix, you feel phone is snappy and fast and you start running and install tons of apps.
This started the 2nd problem, even though is 512MB ram, most you get is 200Meg usable, however with some background service it reduces to 130 on average. After few hours of apps used or longer time the available memory can drop down to 30Meg. This is when you feel the 2nd lag. Even with 80Meg ram available you will still feel lag, and swype start behaving funny.
This can only be solve or temp fix (some people say you shouldn't) if you use softwares like ATK, SystemPanel Apps. (Just KILL THEM ALL) when you feel your phone start to slow down and your phone will than be alive!!!
The real fix for the memory issue.. unfortunately.. i believe we need a phone with minimum 6 to 700MB free RAM. Than you should feel the phone responsive all the time until all the apps start clogging up the usable RAM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't had these problems for a long time, actually using a taskkiller makes it slower for me. Since JM* it's not possible anymore to have only 30Megs free as the least low memory killer level starts at around 40 Megs which turns into having 50ish free all the time. The only time i get lags is when installing apps but otherwise never with loads of apps installed. I use the oneclick lagfix btw.
The filesystem choice is not wise from samsung, the hardware and software interaction are because samsung is using Hummingbird processor and that google developed android to improve it on snapdragon because the nexus one is running it and most of the andro phones. So samsung has to "fix" android for their processor.
For the memory "issues" like I said on another topic
http://geekfor.me/faq/you-shouldnt-be-using-a-task-killer-with-android/
Linux however isn’t generally affected by this. While I admit that I don’t know the architecture and reason for this… linux will run the same regardless of if you have 20mb free memory or 200mb.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was wondering if we can expect a ramhack in the future or if it looks like it will never happen.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
That would be awesome. I too am intrigued by this.
is a ram hack even necessary? it certainly was with my G1 but this phone has much more ram that anything we might be able to free would be irrelevant
Ramhack?
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 running Cyanogenmod.
Powers88 said:
is a ram hack even necessary? it certainly was with my G1 but this phone has much more ram that anything we might be able to free would be irrelevant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me, it's not even a matter of if it's necessary, but can it be done?
Where there's a will there's a way
More is better my old nexus got 400 MB usable via ramhacks, on less optimal conditions I miss those few bytes.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
Also interested in this. Anything to increase performance, Im all for it.
Definately worth looking in to.
Powers88 said:
is a ram hack even necessary? it certainly was with my G1 but this phone has much more ram that anything we might be able to free would be irrelevant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm with you. The reason I sold my mt3g and picked up the mt4g was mainly for the extra ram. The G2 has plenty, I don't really see the need.
If I recall correctly the extra ram came at the expense of graphics and 3d. Hardly a worthwhile trade off for a device that already has plenty of ram.
Phateless said:
I'm with you. The reason I sold my mt3g and picked up the mt4g was mainly for the extra ram. The G2 has plenty, I don't really see the need.
If I recall correctly the extra ram came at the expense of graphics and 3d. Hardly a worthwhile trade off for a device that already has plenty of ram.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya they had that ram hack and they had the one that was with the new radio which just allowed for 14 more megs to be freed without losing anything
Powers88 said:
Ya they had that ram hack and they had the one that was with the new radio which just allowed for 14 more megs to be freed without losing anything
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The new radio is different than the old ram hack.
If I'm wrong about this, someone please correct me.
The ram hack "stole" memory from gpu. (graphics)
The new radio/spl mapped memory that was previously unavailable in its entirety and gave us access to it.
Does that make more sense? The first is a hack/mod done by the devs here and the second is an upgrade from HTC/T-mobile.
Phateless said:
The new radio is different than the old ram hack.
If I'm wrong about this, someone please correct me.
The ram hack "stole" memory from gpu. (graphics)
The new radio/spl mapped memory that was previously unavailable in its entirety and gave us access to it.
Does that make more sense? The first is a hack/mod done by the devs here and the second is an upgrade from HTC/T-mobile.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your right, I already knew what it was I just didnt explain it
The nexus was able to increase the ram by repartitioning its usage. Why can't we? Does anybody have a partition map saying how much ram goes to every reasource? I know 371 is not the max we can pull out.
Sent from my CM7 G2
If I'm not mistaken I believe I saw something about memory partitions in the wiki.
Sent from my thumbs
I am an Eris user, soon to be DINC2 owner at the end of this week. I've been reading through the threads here getting ready for my purchase and it has been very informative.
I searched the DINC2 forums and did not see this mentioned. Has anyone tried zepplinrox' V6 Supercharger script on the DINC2? I'm not going to regurgitate his post verbatim, but it is a memory optimizer. It was introduced to me over on the Eris forums, in the GSB ROM thread. It really makes a difference on the Eris, but I'm not sure how much difference it would make on the DINC2.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=991276
He also has another script called 3G Turbocharger. This will probably make a difference on the DINC2. According to zepplinrox, "the 3g script reconfigures the build.prob and kernel to change the speed settings to a better enhanced setting. Think of it like a TCP optimizer on windows." On my phone I have noticed an increase in speed surfing the web, downloading apps and in other 3g activities. It may be placebo, but it does seem faster. If nothing else, I do plan to add this to my DINC2 when I get it.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=15948434#post15948434
There is also a Kernel Tweaks script on the above link as well. I am using it too, but not sure what performance gains I am getting.
Per zepplinrox' post, this should work on stock and rooted ROMS.
I am by no means an expert on this, so don't shoot me if this is in the wrong forum, not valid on the DINC2, or a repost. Just trying to pass along something that works well for me.
For now those scripts are useless for phone that came preloaded with GB 2.3.3.....no root no turbo.
This sounds interesting to me, I am rooted, would it work?
Sent from my ADR6350 using XDA App
This wouldn't really benefit the Inc2. The Eris was a very memory limited device designed to run Android 1.5. Upgrading beyond this was pushing the Eris to its limits, and in some cases, beyond. Running newer versions of Android would make memory management more difficult because of the higher memory requirements and the very limited memory.
The Inc2 has one of the bigger pools of memory available for Android devices. It has 768mb of total RAM when many current generation devices are getting 512mb (others are either getting 768mb or 1gb). Unless you are running a LOT of background apps, or somehow managed to find apps that require massive amounts of memory, this is plenty of room.
What does it do? It tunes memory settings and task manager. That's pretty much it. It could have an effect on the Inc2, but I wouldn't really consider it a necessity.
Edit: BTW, my previous device was an Eris.
Well, Desire HD users with 768mb of ram enjoy improvements.
It even improves performance of an Atrix with 1gb or ram...
So it probably will help.
So "It tunes memory settings and task manager" is an understatement.
It revamps the whole memory thing
ben805 said:
For now those scripts are useless for phone that came preloaded with GB 2.3.3.....no root no turbo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, I think these will work without root. I think the only drawback without root is the scripts do not stick on boot so you have to re-run on each boot/reboot.
nimdae said:
This wouldn't really benefit the Inc2. The Eris was a very memory limited device designed to run Android 1.5. Upgrading beyond this was pushing the Eris to its limits, and in some cases, beyond. Running newer versions of Android would make memory management more difficult because of the higher memory requirements and the very limited memory.
The Inc2 has one of the bigger pools of memory available for Android devices. It has 768mb of total RAM when many current generation devices are getting 512mb (others are either getting 768mb or 1gb). Unless you are running a LOT of background apps, or somehow managed to find apps that require massive amounts of memory, this is plenty of room.
What does it do? It tunes memory settings and task manager. That's pretty much it. It could have an effect on the Inc2, but I wouldn't really consider it a necessity.
Edit: BTW, my previous device was an Eris.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It may not, but zepplinrox posted above about the Desire HD with similar RAM and the Atrix with more that reported improvements.
Whether you use the Supercharger script or not, the 3G Turbo is definitely worth trying. Again, it may be placebo, but I think my up/download speeds are faster after the script. Here is a post with some info on speed improvements with the script.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=15959134&postcount=1139
I use the Mega memory option with the v6 script. I notice a huge difference in performance.
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA App
Has anyone tried it on Virtuous Unity?
Stam2000 said:
Has anyone tried it on Virtuous Unity?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I second this... I am intrigued...
Sent from my ADR6350 using Tapatalk
3g turbocharger didnt increase anything to my 3g speeds.
MJL99 said:
3g turbocharger didnt increase anything to my 3g speeds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same here. i've actually tried the v6 superchgarer and saw no improvements. actually, the only thing that happened was my battery life took a hit.
lol, well that's no good.