Develop Bugs

[Q] Not getting 5000+ quadrant scores with Beastmod II 4.2 like others are claiming

Not getting 5000+ quadrant scores with Beastmod II 4.2 like others are claiming... did i do something wrong?...some insight would be useful. The highest iv hit is 3300+

ejsorto said:
Not getting 5000+ quadrant scores with Beastmod II 4.2 like others are claiming... did i do something wrong?...some insight would be useful. The highest iv hit is 3300+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do not worry too much about it. Quadrant doesnt support dual core.

Use antutu benchmark..
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

Tnx guys...as far as antutu...what would be a good score?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App

ejsorto said:
Not getting 5000+ quadrant scores with Beastmod II 4.2 like others are claiming... did i do something wrong?...some insight would be useful. The highest iv hit is 3300+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most people who are getting 5000+ quadrant score are flashing it completely new, closing all programs, then running the quadrant test 3-4 times.

Yep...I got 5329 on antutu
sent from my T-mobile Galaxy S2 with Beastmod II v.4.2

reboot then try and run quadrant it runs best after a reboot when all the RAM and other services are refreshed.

Don't out too much stock into it. The scores can be made to look anyway someone wants with the right tweaks. I can show you a rom that scores over 9000 but lags like hell in real world use. Benchmark scores are pointless

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Just ran mine... 2764 on jug 4.1 ...just the fact that it's comparing it to a nexus one should tell you to maybe stop using quadrant?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App

talltexan said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahahahahahaha
Sent from my iPhone

accordex said:
Just ran mine... 2764 on jug 4.1 ...just the fact that it's comparing it to a nexus one should tell you to maybe stop using quadrant?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. The app maker doesn't seem to give a **** about their app anymore.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

talltexan said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome!
Also, I used Antutu Benchmark and my phone is not rooted and still running stock TMO.....my score was 6246. Not sure is Antutu is accurate.

I just flashed the new paradox rom and hit 5930...i dont think antutu is accurate considering im oc to 1.8 with synergy...and your stock
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App

Yeah, there is no way your rom can be doing worse then mine. Mine is not even rooted.

I tried to tell you guys. The scores can be affected by many things. The only real test is REAL world use.

hmmm...quadrant benchmark has always been a good ref for me.

synergeticink said:
hmmm...quadrant benchmark has always been a good ref for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant doesn't even support dual core so unfortunately its a **** reference.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

So why are people bragging about there benchmark speeds. Why does it matter if the quadrant scores ref dual core or not? Its still checking all the functions of your device and how your cpu performs those functions, so in away it does reflect the dual core but not specifically or completely. Until a better benchmark comes out this is what we have to work with, but using Quadrant I score around 3000 while the guys running the roms run about 5000....that makes alot more sense to me than this other bench mark app that says I am running at a faster benchmark than a completely rooted device with a rom.

Oh well...all i know is all is well...running silky smooth...i hate touch wiz...tnx for all the suggestions guys
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App

So I was using antutu bench and I saw this...

Who is this?!?
What's wrong but so right with this pic?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

ICS, interesting. Let's see how the rumor mill explains this.

Maybe it was from one of those Rev ROMS...
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

The clock speed is also 1.9ghz

Ics and almost 2ghz clocks is crazy
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Somebody's not sharing ICS with us

Went and checked it out to make sure it wasn't some photoshop voodoo and it is there
The question is how easy is it to fake submitted data? If you can't then I'd call it a great sign for the near future but closed in a shroud of unanswered questions.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Could just be an edited build prop.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Killbynature said:
Could just be an edited build prop.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair enough
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

avarize said:
Went and checked it out to make sure it wasn't some photoshop voodoo and it is there
The question is how easy is it to fake submitted data? If you can't then I'd call it a great sign for the near future but closed in a shroud of unanswered questions.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LoL. I knew somebody would think Photoshop made an appearance. I was seeing the effects of the updated v6 supercharger script and there it was.

ntellegence said:
LoL. I knew somebody would think Photoshop made an appearance. I was seeing the effects of the updated v6 supercharger script and there it was.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wasn't accusing but these days it has to be ruled out
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

It's a building prop edit I just edited mines to see if it would show up.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

jasontx said:
Maybe it was from one of those Rev ROMS...
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this, Never a fan of that since it led some people to believe ICS was available in our phone.
Someone should modify the build prop to 4.5 and benchmark their phone and time
how long for it to reach the rumor mill.

Killbynature said:
It's a building prop edit I just edited mines to see if it would show up.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it had to be a build prop edit because for ics to be oc at 1.9 and getting that kind of pathetic score would be 1 hell of a disappointment.. when i get over 7300 oc at 1.72 with faux..

foreverloco said:
it had to be a build prop edit because for ics to be oc at 1.9 and getting that kind of pathetic score would be 1 hell of a disappointment.. when i get over 7300 oc at 1.72 with faux..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A lower score with ics would actually make sense. Assuming its is really ics. ICS is much more a system hog itself than previous os. The only reason the transformer prime scores high is because it's a pentacore device so the test stresses all the cores.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

probably the CM9 team trying out stuff?

AllGamer said:
probably the CM9 team trying out stuff?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, I don't think anyone ever though of that.
Killbynature said:
A lower score with ics would actually make sense. Assuming its is really ics. ICS is much more a system hog itself than previous os. The only reason the transformer prime scores high is because it's a pentacore device so the test stresses all the cores.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very true, the Exynos is able to keep even with benchmarks, only because it's just a much better CPU, thanks to the Cortex A9 tech. The S3, which snappy, will lose some performance on ICS, most likely not noticeable, but you will lose it on benchmarks.

Remember Rev and his ics build and how much crap people gave him because his build prop was 4.0.3? It's gotta be that.
Message relayed from the dark side.

Longcat14 said:
Hmm, I don't think anyone ever though of that.
Very true, the Exynos is able to keep even with benchmarks, only because it's just a much better CPU, thanks to the Cortex A9 tech. The S3, which snappy, will lose some performance on ICS, most likely not noticeable, but you will lose it on benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wrong
ics brings performance improvements, the reason why gnexus scored badly is because its running 720p on a sgx540..

AznDud333 said:
wrong
ics brings performance improvements, the reason why gnexus scored badly is because its running 720p on a sgx540..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ICS is also more of a system hog, which will drop the benchmarks, but will increase real world performance dramatically.

Highest E4GT quadrant scores?

In just curious what kind of quadrant scores people have been getting with which setups? in running Blazer ROM with Hitman kernel. with setcpu I just hit a score of 6171.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App

cknuth said:
In just curious what kind of quadrant scores people have been getting with which setups? in running Blazer ROM with Hitman kernel. with setcpu I just hit a score of 6171.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pictures or it didn't happen...
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

There's at least two other threads that show scores. I've seen quads in the 6k, but I forgot what the setups were. My personal highest was 4932.

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
sent from the near past

I can't get over 1.5GHz without freezing sadly. I get high 4000s
Sent from my Epic™ 4G Touch

. Adjust your voltages maybe
sent from the near past

holy balls those are some high scores..... really dont look into the "epeen benchmarks" since last year... because all it takes to get a higher score is multiple runs and tweaks to the fps/ext4 system
but alot of you hope showing your quadrants/linpacs would get you laid...... lol just playing (i had to)
but damn man those SMOKE the evo 3d on its BEST day/kernel.... and to think... many have said (even my self) that they have the same performance.... (i owned a E4GT since launch and sold it a few weeks later) cant wait to get my white one tomorrow!!!!

blendz rom gunslinger kernel @1.6 set at performance but just started running really buggy after

Didn't do quite as good on this one. its fun to just play around and try and improve your score.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App

To the gentleman who some how broke 6500. How did you do it?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

nthornton1990 said:
To the gentleman who some how broke 6500. How did you do it?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With the setup I posted....cleared my ram....1.6 with on demand....setting to performance doesn't give me better preformance...and the low 6000 was on 1.5
sent from the near past

Danial723 said:
With the setup I posted....cleared my ram....1.6 with on demand....setting to performance doesn't give me better preformance...and the low 6000 was on 1.5
sent from the near past
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got the same set up and all I could muster was:
Using the lazy governor gives me higher scores than ondemand or performance.

I'm not too far behind and I have a single core hahaha 1.5ghz
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:

I got like 4850 or something like that without any OC. Just Blazer and Gunslinger.

SuperSwagSauce said:
I got like 4850 or something like that without any OC. Just Blazer and Gunslinger.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously though take into account the dualcore at 1.2...... its obvious your scores will be higher besides the point quadrant numbers mean nothing to me.... I was just saying for an almost EOL phone 4504 isn't bad
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:

Biggoron said:
Seriously though take into account the dualcore at 1.2...... its obvious your scores will be higher besides the point quadrant numbers mean nothing to me.... I was just saying for an almost EOL phone 4504 isn't bad
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not at all. I wasn't really aiming that at you anyway lol. I thought the quadrant benchmark only tested one core?

SuperSwagSauce said:
Not at all. I wasn't really aiming that at you anyway lol. I thought the quadrant benchmark only tested one core?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doubt it, your thinking of smartbench 2010 and 2011 which '10 is for single cores because it doesn't do multithreads whereas '11 does .
I would think quadrant would use as much as there is. I don't think it only uses one core
Sent From My SPH-D700 Running Android 4.0 :sly:

Blazer 3.8 odex hitman kernel
oc to 1504.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk

nthornton1990 said:
To the gentleman who some how broke 6500. How did you do it?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A good ROM and oc to 1.7ghz
Sent from my Epic™ 4G Touch

globalninja said:
A good ROM and oc to 1.7ghz
Sent from my Epic™ 4G Touch
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Man, Im overclocked to 1.7, cleared ram, and still cant pull 6000.

Lets see some AnTuTu Benchmark test's

Not that the benchmarks matter but will see who can score the best.
This is on CM10 nightly.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

But why do you care?

seksmeup said:
But why do you care?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you dont care, you dont need to answer.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app

Alarmmy said:
If you dont care, you dont need to answer.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see why developer forums need stupid e-peen threads like these.

seksmeup said:
I don't see why developer forums need stupid e-peen threads like these.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This isn't the developer forum. And I am asking just for chitchat, See "general" forum at the top^^^.

sswb27 said:
This isn't the developer forum. And I am asking just for chitchat, See "general" forum at the top^^^.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never said this subforum specifically was for development. Looks like you need to read better.

If you don't like op's thread than don't reply.
As much as you don't care for this thread their are many who don't care for your opinion.

couple of things...
seksmeup you are the epitome of whats wrong with these forums... stfu and don't post on here if you have issues with a subject...wtf do you do? troll around all day looking for things that annoy you? Clown!
my Antutu score was only 6700 on stock rom...which was very disappointing coming from my g2x which was rooted and i was getting 7200+
that being said I was interested in finding out what others are running at. I'm confused because in the comparison screen i see other s3's running 10k+ ...what gives?

majic12 said:
couple of things...
seksmeup you are the epitome of whats wrong with these forums... stfu and don't post on here if you have issues with a subject...wtf do you do? troll around all day looking for things that annoy you? Clown!
my Antutu score was only 6700 on stock rom...which was very disappointing coming from my g2x which was rooted and i was getting 7200+
that being said I was interested in finding out what others are running at. I'm confused because in the comparison screen i see other s3's running 10k+ ...what gives?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i believe the 10k+ scores are those with the quad core version, the i9300.
but my highest score was around 7250

Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium

I got 7700 running r6 and faux's kernel @1.83

Such benchmarks are useful from build to build for judging certain aspects of your rom ....not hardware but. ..I use antutu like crazy to find a sweet spot for say dirty cache settings and cache pressure. ...things like memory or database are not native. ..they go thru Linux and then the vm. ...this allows you to observe just that. ..the behavior of Linux young underlying the vm
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

seksmeup said:
I don't see why developer forums need stupid e-peen threads like these.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont see why a stupid guy like u was born in this Earth! Such a waste of oxygen!
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app

8000+ with no oc at 1.5
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium

Digging a bit dated thread. For those who might find it beneficial.
I had gotten lower 7000s on Stock everything.
My Score on AnTuTu is 11442. The SGH-T999 is running Liquidsmooth ROM JB v2.0 with its Stock Kernel (Lean Kernel) and TWRP Touch Recovery.
Screenshot attached.

how come i am getting like 16000 regularly with many roms, lowest was 10,000 but there was an issue with crap running in the background then, and i was playing with other stuff, mostly trying to check the cpu temp etc... but what gives? is no one else here using antutu 4?

asaqwert said:
how come i am getting like 16000 regularly with many roms, lowest was 10,000 but there was an issue with crap running in the background then, and i was playing with other stuff, mostly trying to check the cpu temp etc... but what gives? is no one else here using antutu 4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really old thread mate
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium

Crisisx1 said:
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It varies with each ROMs

LG Optimus G F180L vs HTC One X Quadrant

Hey guys
I just ran quadrant and here are results .. One X has bit more points..
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
If u have results u can post them (with SAME mobile)

HTC One X is smoked
I am running the leaked Jelly Bean firmware though so maybe improved the scores
Sent from my LG-F180L using xda premium

But this si mainly for gaming and I dont game..
Sent from my LG-F180L using xda app-developers app

iEthos said:
But this si mainly for gaming and I dont game..
Sent from my LG-F180L using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whats just for gaming? Not following you?
Sent from my LG-F180L using xda premium

This benchmark tests gpu mostly..
Sent from my LG-F180L using xda app-developers app

iEthos said:
This benchmark tests gpu mostly..
Sent from my LG-F180L using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it does benchmark graphics but my test shows cpu and memory higher than the One X, is your One X modified in any way?
The Optimus G is the fastest phone on the planet at present, until Samsung releases the GS4 with the new Exynos processor or the new Qualcomm chips announced at CES this week.
Sent from my LG-F180L using xda premium

I have both phones
Htc is rooted but rooted only nothing else..
Sent from my LG-F180L using xda app-developers app

iEthos said:
I have both phones
Htc is rooted but rooted only nothing else..
Sent from my LG-F180L using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just ran the tests for 3 consecutive runs in quadrant and the scores just get lower and lower, the first run is always the highest as the phone hasnt been used but as it gets warmer the scores get lower. Wasnt aware that the Optimus was throttled similar to the Nexus 4
Sent from my LG-F180L using xda premium

ianford10 said:
Just ran the tests for 3 consecutive runs in quadrant and the scores just get lower and lower, the first run is always the highest as the phone hasnt been used but as it gets warmer the scores get lower. Wasnt aware that the Optimus was throttled similar to the Nexus 4
Sent from my LG-F180L using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am NOT really fan of benchmarks cos this LG is fast as HELL websites loading flaming fast and apps too
Today I was measuring speed on H+ ( 3 network ) and I had max 11Mbps amazing unfortunately NOT in my hometowm different town..

Quadrant is not a good graphics performance benchmark. You want Nenamark or Antutu for that.
Sent from my LG-E971 using Tapatalk 2

My F180K got 8000-8200 points in quadrant and aprox 16000-17000 in antutu

How come i have 6300 only then?
Sent from my LG-F180L using xda app-developers app

I get around 7600.
Sent from my LG-E971 using Tapatalk 2

How come i have 6300 only then?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe:
1)Overheating
2)A lot of apps in background.
3)F180L software bug
8200 isnt really a lot, cause DNA makes near 8600 points (With full HD screen) and new Xperia even higher with full hd screen and same CPU.

Tim4 said:
Maybe:
1)Overheating
2)A lot of apps in background.
3)F180L software bug
8200 isnt really a lot, cause DNA makes near 8600 points (With full HD screen) and new Xperia even higher with full hd screen and same CPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's cause Quadrant is a bogus benchmark.
Sent from my LG-E971 using Tapatalk 2

Not really, cause in Antutu xperia reaches 20.000 points, which is far from 16.5k of my one.
And again, xperia has same cpu, 2gb ram and full hd resolution
And the DNA did, if i remember correctly, 18k points
Btw official JB is out, gonna bench again right now to check if there any difference
---
Hah, 5900 in quadrant. I want to shoot LG developers seriously
Now i understand how nexus4 did that low scores, unlike optimus g the stock was 4.1 and 3.4 kernel

Now I got this..
So it is NOT like fix score it is balancing depend of mobile status .. EXACTLY Tim4
You right!
[/URL][/IMG]
Sent from my LG-F180L using xda app-developers app

Tim4 said:
Not really, cause in Antutu xperia reaches 20.000 points, which is far from 16.5k of my one.
And again, xperia has same cpu, 2gb ram and full hd resolution
And the DNA did, if i remember correctly, 18k points
Btw official JB is out, gonna bench again right now to check if there any difference
---
Hah, 5900 in quadrant. I want to shoot LG developers seriously
Now i understand how nexus4 did that low scores, unlike optimus g the stock was 4.1 and 3.4 kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but i must disagree with this your post!
lg is great now E973 is the BEST !
And + when i will be updated to jelly it will be MEGA BEST

We will see
Anyway, on 4.0.4 my quadrant score was used to be 8000~ points
On todays JB update only 6000 points~
But visually, i see no difference in speed at all.

Exactly, benchmark and, even more, Quadrant specificaly is not a precise way to test between two devices.
You'd have to, at least, install a vanilla AOSP to compare, since even the customisation of every manifacturers can cause a lot of change.
Ironicaly, a GIU which utilise the GPU to optimise smoothness on the devices would get a lower score on benchmarking, since the hardware is partly utilised by the system. But the "lower score" would mean a more pleasant experience and more fluid navigation. And, since the processor is powerfull enough, this wouldn't cause any latency in other applications or games.
I think it's more important to look for lag in different applications than to bench and check for numbers. Like when browsing in the gallery, playing games, installing apps or browsing Play store, etc.
Benchmark is a good tool to check for optimisation on the same device, or to compare if certain changes can cause sludge, like adding an apps that stays in the background.