Not sure what I am doing wrong but the converted video is slightly smaller than the screen leaving a small black border. I have set the size ay 800 x 480.
Tried several converters so I must be setting something wrong.
Picture quality is wonderful.
Help!!!
Related
3.6inches doesn't say much when you can stretch the Lengh and Width. Can someone tell me in inches how wide and tall is the 3.6 inche screen? I want to compare it to my Touch Pro screen.
Reason is I use Pocket Informant and when in calender mode it be comes almost unreadable with the small text. But yet on my old Pocket PC which had VGA 3.5in screen, the calender was readable where I would see the date and times in the calender view.
My TP= 1 and 3/4in wide by 2 and 1/4in tall.
my LOOX= 2in wide by 2 and 3/4in tall.
My TP2 screen is 1 and 7/8 inches wide by 3 and 7/8 inches tall
Joe
Hmm I wish it was a bit wider, but 1 and 7/8 is kinda close to 2inches.. I wonder if that's enough more to fit enough characters width wise to make it useable..
Well your TP screen resolution is 480 x 640, my TP2 is 480 x 800, so in effect it's a taller screen with pretty much the same width & same resolution, I dont think you'll notice the missing 1/8 of an inch!
Joe
Well the 480 doesn't mean it's the same width. You could have a wider screen wit less pixel density. Which is why I wanted to know the exact screen size to measure. Yours is a little wider than mine. so I'm hoping the extra space will allow more characters to be filled on the calender screen. When reading left to right. I know up/down it'll have more space per date.
http://www.sizeasy.com/page/size_comparison/25899-Tilt2-vs-Loox2-vs-TP2
I did a screen compare. Unless I'm totally off on the screen size. I hate conversion from "in" to "mm".
I can see why Pocket inoformant calender view was so readable on the Loox. And so small on the TP(It's not a TP2, It renamed it to TP2). The Tilt2 is large in height, but just a little wider than my TP. I wonder if this means my calander would look really tall?
I was wondering...
Is there anyway to cut the resolution on the rhodium? I read somewhere that a separate device ran quicker because of its low resolution and screen size--that is, it ran quicker than larger screens with 1ghz processors. The rhodium specs aren't exactly designed to portray 800x600 resolutions >__>, there seems to be a noticeable lag in most shells (SPB, Sense).
Is there anyway to lower the resolution to 640 x 480? I wouldn't mind taking the resolution cut for a faster phone. and is 640 x 480 VGA?
I found this:
http://www.1800pocketpc.com/2010/01...-resolution-from-wvga-vga-and-wqvga-qvga.html
but all it does is crop the screen--theres still a black box. Now i'm wondering if we ran a stretched resolution if we could get performance gains. It wouldnt be as crisp as the natural resolution and things would be stretched out, but... would it even be possible or workable? anybody have any input?
Im sure others have noticed this in the past with pretty much all phones.
Why is it you always have to crop the pic when you make it a home screen wallpaper, even if its the same resloution as your display?
Example. the optimus screen res is 768x1280, why cant i have a wallpaper that size??
It crops the pic to a size around 600x800 , for arguments sake.
or for example , if you have on scrolling wallpaper why not a pic thats 5376x1280. This would be one full size 768x1280 pic for each of the seven home screens.
are there any apps/hacks to fix this.
just doesnt make sense, maybe im missing something.....
side note - i dont have any paint programs on my pc at the moment so i cant verify what dpi the images im using are. nor have i checked in the past, now that i think about it. it may or may not have anything to do with the issue
Thoughts?
I put in my own wallpaper - the image needs to be 1440 x 1280 for this phone. Are you talking about adding wallpaper for each of your home screens? If that's the case, check out MultiPicture Live Wallpaper. Yeah, the 1440 x 1280 image is cropped a little bit all around, no clue why. Same with my PC monitor - if I size wallpaper exactly to its dimensions it never comes out precisely right. Always have to compensate for that, depending on which sides gets screwed up.
After getting access to the factory wallpapers, I have found they are sized at 1536 x 1280 from LG . Odd size I know.
That is what I have created mine at and they work perfect without any cropping.
sanity29 said:
After getting access to the factory wallpapers, I have found they are sized at 1536 x 1280 from LG . Odd size I know.
That is what I have created mine at and they work perfect without any cropping.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's 1536 x 1280 probably because it's 1280 tall, and 2x 768 wide to account for wallpaper scrolling
If it's 1536 x 1280 then why does my 1440 x 1280 on the phone end up being cropped shorter on every side?
Like I said, that's the size of the factory wallpapers. Give it a try. 1536 x 1280. This is the home screen size. You will crop the sides for the lock screen.
Nah, 1536 x 1280 still crops off both sides and the top. Bottom is fine. Also tried multiple sizes to well below the given screen size and they still don't come out exact.
I really don't care, just wonder why this is.
Odd as that doesn't crop for me. Gives me the option to crop, but doesn't actually crop anything.
After going through a bunch of resolutions and aspect ratio wallpapers found here
http://topwalls.net/category/abstract/page/3/
Ive decided that the aspect ratio seems to be close to 5:4. It does still crop the edges but only slightly.
Resolution seems not to matter only the ratio. I've tried pics greater than 5000 x whatever and they work fine.
At the moment I'm using the Fullscreen 5:4 @ 2560 x 2048 and they look great.
Got my PC and paint programs back up and running.gonna see if I can find the exact aspect ratio and resolution size
In Photoshop I started to figure out what the precise figures were, but even when I loaded up goofball ratios and/or dimensions much smaller than the screen's 1280 x 786 (like 400 x 300) and then on the phone chose full width, the sides were still truncated. At that point I said - screw it.
Recently got this tab for the high resolution screen but have been disappointed by the Facebook app the pictures are pixelated and videos any way to load them higher resolution ???
bilalrashid said:
Recently got this tab for the high resolution screen but have been disappointed by the Facebook app the pictures are pixelated and videos any way to load them higher resolution ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Facebook app is actually designed for phones. They haven't created a tablet style version of the app yet, so you're better of viewing things in portrait mode on Facebook or try and use the website rather than the app.
Pictures are automatically compressed and loose quality when they've been uploaded to Facebook so that maybe a factor although it pretty much comes down to what the other user (who you're viewing the media from) is using to take pictures or video's and how they're uploading them. It looks perfectly fine on my Tab S.
Just because your screen is a resolution of 2560 x 1600 this doesn't mean that when a person takes a 1920 x 1080 video it will look any better than on a 2560 x 1600 screen. It should actually look a bit worse as it's 2x the pixels of 1920 x 1080 and thus your tablet is having to use 4 pixels for every one pixel that would be used on 1920 x 1080 native screen. This makes images look slightly more blocky when they're not the native resolution of the screen, though this problem is harder to see on a tablet screen due to the size of them. It's hard to describe but I've done my best.
The main area's of advantage you'll get out of a high pixel screen and the AMOLED is from better colour reproductions, clearer UI and better looking webpages/books when reading.
Hope this helps If it does give me a thanks!
And here I thought I was the only one with Facebook video problems. I am glad to know it was not my tablet acting up.
I got my US unlocked Note 10+ yesterday and loving it so far but I can't seem to figure out how to change the resolution of pictures. I found the aspect ratio setting but not resolution.
I found a couple people with the same question about the S10+ when it came out and replies were that the aspect ratio IS the resolution... That can't be true can it?
I took pictures of various items with it and the file size was always between 3 and 4 MB. That can't be the max size of pictures from this phone right?
Could anyone point my in the right direction?
I am not sure about the Note 10+ but on my S10+, the option to change the resolution was removed. You can only change the aspect ratio. Don't know why Samsung removed it. Apparently because different lenses have different resolutions and it will be confusing to set resolution to each one. I think you get max resolution at 4:3.
I tested with a few phones because I always preferred "wide" pictures, but indeed the 8M pixels 16/9 ratio which got lower resolution, is just a cropped 12M pixels 4/3 ratio version with a higher resolution, so I better just crop the pictures myself if I want a 16/9 version of it.
I guess it kind of makes sense to not allow resolution changes when there are multiple camera lenses... I also should have looked at the actual resolution of the resulting file, not just the file size; the files are 12 MP. Just odd the file size is so small.
Thanks for the replies!
Jepod said:
I got my US unlocked Note 10+ yesterday and loving it so far but I can't seem to figure out how to change the resolution of pictures. I found the aspect ratio setting but not resolution.
I found a couple people with the same question about the S10+ when it came out and replies were that the aspect ratio IS the resolution... That can't be true can it?
I took pictures of various items with it and the file size was always between 3 and 4 MB. That can't be the max size of pictures from this phone right?
Could anyone point my in the right direction?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3-4 MB are about right for a 12MP pic. I just checked mine and they were at Max 4.5MB. But I think that was a super wide photo, which is a 16MP lense. Same size as my Note 9 pics.