Develop Bugs

Custom Kernel for Stock

How many of you are running stock? Would you like a custom kernel with optimizations, governors, schedulers and overclocking/undervolting? Would anyone use it if I released one? If so, what governors and schedulers would you like to see?
Thanks!

Personally, I love running stock. I would definitely like to see a kernel that focuses on battery saving.

Please release the kernel. This phone needs some overclock

I'm going to wait until Nougat source is released to build a stock kernel since I was accepted into the Beta.

A custom kernel for Nougat would push me even closer to the already close edge that is my wallet.
This phone seriously looks attractive for the ~$160 asking price on Newegg/Amazon. Coming from a Nexus 5/Spare GS4, I'm used to really poor battery life and average performance.
I'm currently eyeing the Moto G4 and the Robin. The Robin is much more powerful, but doesn't have a replaceable battery and has a much smaller battery (technically the G4's battery isn't replaceable but it can be done fairly easily). There's also this business with Razer, which isn't too big of an issue as I normally stick with custom ROMs (and stock is getting quite a few updates in the future).
Both are in the high ~$160-200 range. Any input? If the Robin's battery is somehow replaceable that would be amazing, and I'd like an OEM supplier.

negusp said:
A custom kernel for Nougat would push me even closer to the already close edge that is my wallet.
This phone seriously looks attractive for the ~$160 asking price on Newegg/Amazon. Coming from a Nexus 5/Spare GS4, I'm used to really poor battery life and average performance.
I'm currently eyeing the Moto G4 and the Robin. The Robin is much more powerful, but doesn't have a replaceable battery and has a much smaller battery (technically the G4's battery isn't replaceable but it can be done fairly easily). There's also this business with Razer, which isn't too big of an issue as I normally stick with custom ROMs (and stock is getting quite a few updates in the future).
Both are in the high ~$160-200 range. Any input? If the Robin's battery is somehow replaceable that would be amazing, and I'd like an OEM supplier.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would also be amazing to see some voltage control to control the beast of an 808.

There will be a custom kernel available in the near future for AOSP/Omni on the Robin. It is currently being tested ? and so far it's showing quite a bit of promise.
Some features it'll include are efficient hotplugging, optimized CPU governors, a new I/O scheduler and much more.. Based on Electron Kernel for the Nexus 6p by @frap129

nexbit robin has volte support any one test ??????

variravitejareddy said:
nexbit robin has volte support any one test ??????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know for T-Mobile US yes but idk for where you are at.

Saythis said:
There will be a custom kernel available in the near future for AOSP/Omni on the Robin. It is currently being tested and so far it's showing quite a bit of promise.
Some features it'll include are efficient hotplugging, optimized CPU governors, a new I/O scheduler and much more.. Based on Electron Kernel for the Nexus 6p by @frap129
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you need a tester, I would love to help.

Saythis said:
There will be a custom kernel available in the near future for AOSP/Omni on the Robin. It is currently being tested ? and so far it's showing quite a bit of promise.
Some features it'll include are efficient hotplugging, optimized CPU governors, a new I/O scheduler and much more.. Based on Electron Kernel for the Nexus 6p by @frap129
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any news on the electron kernel?

Saythis said:
There will be a custom kernel available in the near future for AOSP/Omni on the Robin. It is currently being tested ? and so far it's showing quite a bit of promise.
Some features it'll include are efficient hotplugging, optimized CPU governors, a new I/O scheduler and much more.. Based on Electron Kernel for the Nexus 6p by @frap129
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Updates?

xBane_ said:
Updates?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems to be dead

Nope not dead. You can get weekly builds from here https://github.com/frap129/ether-weeklies

sykomaniac said:
Nope not dead. You can get weekly builds from here https://github.com/frap129/ether-weeklies
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the kernel only compatible with Omni?

crian said:
Is the kernel only compatible with Omni?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The latest weekly build doesn't boot with Omni 7.1.2, so I'm not sure.

I believe the kernel is meant for Nextbit OS 7.0, not for custom roms. Not sure though.
Sent from my Robin using XDA

bmccoy11 said:
The latest weekly build doesn't boot with Omni 7.1.2, so I'm not sure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So dirty flashing back to the latest Omni 7.1.1 build and then flashing the kernel should allow get the phone to boot?

Working on trying to get it to boot don't worry guys

sykomaniac said:
Working on trying to get it to boot don't worry guys
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried going back to the latest 7.1.1 build and couldn't get it to boot, so I gave up. Can you give updates in the future?

What is a good custom ROM for Lenovo Z2 Plus?

I'm looking for a Nougat based ROM for this phone. I have a score of 156K on Antutu V7.0.4 on stock ZUI 2 Android 6.0.1, which I think is fairly decent. I don't care about customisations. All I want is a ROM that does not gimp the SoC's performance or reduce battery life/efficiency or have too high resource comsumption (RAM, CPU). Which ones would be the best? I mostly use this device to play games, browse the internet using Chrome and that's all. TIA
Edit: What I basically need from a ROM
1) Shouldn't degrade my SoC performance, only pump the benchmark numbers up
2) Doesn't have to have the latest security patch, as I've had no issues running August 2016 security patch since I got this phone
3) Shouldn't have connectivity issues with LTE/VOLTE, Wifi, Hitspot, Bluetooth
4) Shouldn't degrade the battery life
I know it's too much, but could you type your Antutu V7.0.4 scores in your comments? Does your custom ROM on your Z2+ really support Vulkan? Use Aida64 and lemme know.
TYVM.

Try Ressurection Remix
Sent from my Moto G Play using Tapatalk

Pixel experience rom ....quite stable rom ..loved it

I got about 164k antutu and about 8-9hrs of sot on resurrection remix 6.0 ie 8.1 oreo the best rom I've used till now

Chin_hebbar said:
I got about 164k antutu and about 8-9hrs of sot on resurrection remix 6.0 ie 8.1 oreo the best rom I've used till now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Link please

Miui 9
8 9 hour sot with 168k antutu

Best Performing Rom

Just wandering which ROM provides the highest performance (forget battery life lol), which scores highest on benchmark etc...

+1 Pure Nexus

meciu99 said:
+1 Pure Nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, haven't used ressurection remix yet though

PN development is dead on Nexus 5X

g90814 said:
PN development is dead on Nexus 5X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still a good stabled ROM that has better performance than stock android

DeadFox-xda said:
Still a good stabled ROM that has better performance than stock android
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and has not been updated since last July. No security updates, etc. Time to move on.
LineageOS is pretty good, I'm running the latest 15.1 and it works fine.

g90814 said:
and has not been updated since last July. No security updates, etc. Time to move on.
LineageOS is pretty good, I'm running the latest 15.1 and it works fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Los 15.1 is good but the performance isn't as great, for gaming i see a difference on PN is performs a whole lot better. That's for me anyway, it varies on people's opinion

No complaints about Validus' performance. The ROM is a bit hidden (not in device specific dev forums, GZR have their own subforum), I recommend to try it. Link for quick access is in my sig.
PN doesn't provide Oreo goodies for us anymore, so I'd skip that if you want latest features and security patches.

manpildo said:
No complaints about Validus' performance. The ROM is a bit hidden (not in device specific dev forums, GZR have their own subforum), I recommend to try it. Link for quick access is in my sig.
PN doesn't provide Oreo goodies for us anymore, so I'd skip that if you want latest features and security patches.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you do the geekbench 4 test . Highest I got was about 1100 for single and 3000 for multi that's on PN rom.

DeadFox-xda said:
Can you do the geekbench 4 test . Highest I got was about 1100 for single and 3000 for multi that's on PN rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here you go, screenshot attached. Not that I care about those benchmarks at all, I use my own eyes to benchmark stuff. I was a long-time user of PN on Nougat, but really it became slow and sluggish if I didn't clean flash like once a month or so. Haven't cleaned Validus for months since moving and it's still as snappy as ever. I think it has a lot to do with Oreo's superior memory management, but still even if PN might have produced better benchmark scores (I don't know, I got over this fad years ago so I didn't benchmark it), then that means absolutely nothing to me as it isn't representative of real-world usage.

manpildo said:
Here you go, screenshot attached. Not that I care about those benchmarks at all, I use my own eyes to benchmark stuff. I was a long-time user of PN on Nougat, but really it became slow and sluggish if I didn't clean flash like once a month or so. Haven't cleaned Validus for months since moving and it's still as snappy as ever. I think it has a lot to do with Oreo's superior memory management, but still even if PN might have produced better benchmark scores (I don't know, I got over this fad years ago so I didn't benchmark it), then that means absolutely nothing to me as it isn't representative of real-world usage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The reason why I'm looking for a best performing ROM is for gaming, I wanna play pubg and the coming Fortnite without too much of performance issue

DeadFox-xda said:
The reason why I'm looking for a best performing ROM is for gaming, I wanna play pubg and the coming Fortnite without too much of performance issue
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Off-topic, but I recommend playing PUBG through MEmu. It's an Android emulator for PC. Basically you play it on your computer with mouse and keyboard like any other game, while easily pwning those on mobile because obviously it's a lot harder for them to aim and move at the same time on their small screens with inferior controls. It's funny, feels almost like cheating.

manpildo said:
Off-topic, but I recommend playing PUBG through MEmu. It's an Android emulator for PC. Basically you play it on your computer with mouse and keyboard like any other game, while easily pwning those on mobile because obviously it's a lot harder for them to aim and move at the same time on their small screens with inferior controls. It's funny, feels almost like cheating.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, I don't play games to beat people I play it to have fun. Its not fun to have an advantage . But thanks tho

DeadFox-xda said:
Lol, I don't play games to beat people I play it to have fun. Its not fun to have an advantage . But thanks tho
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair enough mate, I don't like mobile controls in general for this type of games. Hopefully we meet one day in game. :laugh:

manpildo said:
Fair enough mate, I don't like mobile controls in general for this type of games. Hopefully we meet one day in game. :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Add me up if you're in Europe my name tag is TTareq

I love my OP5T, but want to improve battery life

Bought the phone on launch day, 2.5 years later I still love it dearly and can't think of replacing it. Not with all the new flagships being heavier and bulkier, and not having headphone jacks either (where has the world come to?)
There's only one aspect of my OnePlus 5T that I want to improve. And that's battery life.
What are my best options? I'm looking for
- underclocking the CPU and GPU
- undervolting
- anything else software based?
I'm on stock Android 10 rom, locked bootloader etc. Never flashed anything on this device except official OTA update files.
Long live OP5T

You could check your battery health with accubattery or OnePlus diagnostic APK. If it is around or below 80% you could buy a new battery and replace it, it is quite easy. Software based solutions will not have a significant impact. Don't bother with undervolting, but underclocking is an option if you are that desperate and want to unlock the bootloader. If you have never had a factory reset you could give that a go, and start fresh.

banana_bender said:
You could check your battery health with accubattery or OnePlus diagnostic APK. If it is around or below 80% you could buy a new battery and replace it, it is quite easy. Software based solutions will not have a significant impact. Don't bother with undervolting, but underclocking is an option if you are that desperate and want to unlock the bootloader. If you have never had a factory reset you could give that a go, and start fresh.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. Mine is 2.25 years old .
But I rooted my device last year.
Now it's bootloader unlocked.
Installed new A10 OOS . .
Blue Spark recovery and blue spark kernel .
Under clocked with FKM .
My battery capacity according to OnePlus diagnosis is 79%
But yesterday when I checked am getting 6+ hours SOT in 24 hrs last charge .
I usually don't charge my device beyond 80%
It degrades the battery.

Oos 10 and xceed kernel.

gsser said:
Oos 10 and xceed kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it good , this xceed kernel ?
I don't see it here.
I saw it in telegram . And it's also said I need to flash their magsik modules for better results .
Tell me everything you know about this xceed kernel .

rohithksaj said:
Is it good , this xceed kernel ?
I don't see it here.
I saw it in telegram . And it's also said I need to flash their magsik modules for better results .
Tell me everything you know about this xceed kernel .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As it is non gpl compliant it is far better than kanged kernels.
Basically, no bloated things, no kanged stuff. Pure performance and battery life. As (not to be racist) many indian kernel devs just kang each other you almost get the same experience with every kernel and this is why i dont like "open source". It doesnt help anyone. Kanging is easy and if they kang, they dont educate theirselves. Xceed does the opposite. I have used it on my galaxy note 8, it was the best. Now im using it on my 5t. Still the best.

gsser said:
As it is non gpl compliant it is far better than kanged kernels.
Basically, no bloated things, no kanged stuff. Pure performance and battery life. As (not to be racist) many indian kernel devs just kang each other you almost get the same experience with every kernel and this is why i dont like "open source". It doesnt help anyone. Kanging is easy and if they kang, they dont educate theirselves. Xceed does the opposite. I have used it on my galaxy note 8, it was the best. Now im using it on my 5t. Still the best.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Give the kernel file . I found one in telegram .
It is released in Early July . Initial Android Q .
And also there is one magisk module isn't it ?

rohithksaj said:
Give the kernel file . I found one in telegram .
It is released in Early July . Initial Android Q .
And also there is one magisk module isn't it ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It should support paranoid android rom (but no f2fs) someone on pa tried it and said it is working. Since xceed doesnt have "many" features, you dont need to use any kernel manager app(dev said apps lock up userspace. Idk what that means) i just use my phone daily and it gets me around 7-9 hours sot with a %78 battery health

gsser said:
It should support paranoid android rom (but no f2fs)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup that's the one I was talking about . Released in July 1.
But I am not on PA . Am on OOS

rohithksaj said:
Yup that's the one I was talking about . Released in July 1.
But I am not on PA . Am on OOS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here this is my heavy usage compared to my last screenshot

gsser said:
Here this is my heavy usage compared to my last screenshot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good . Excellent
I will flash this when the next stable built of OOS Comes.

Development [KERNEL] [ALIOTH] The 90s Kernel 🔥 Balanced Kernel Alioth / Aliothin

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The 90s kernel for Pocof3 / Redmi k40 and Mi 11x
Be careful if you have any damage to your device I would not be the cause because it is your choice to install my kernel on your device.
For your reassure, each release of this kernel is verified and tested to be the most stable possible
Kratos Edition​*First initial build
*upstream to 5.15.1
*optimized for Corvus and Xdroid
*Alpha build
*fix Fastcharging
*Don’t with A12 ROMs – Until Next Update
2.0 Changelogs:
*Upstreamed LTS to: 4.19.215
*Focused on Battery and Performance
*fixed Miui not showing up kernel version
*Fixed Low brightness
*Replaced touch drivers (thanks to @Dawfuk)
*Thanks To All My Testers
*Credits :
@Dawfuk
Eclipsia kernel
Optimus Drunk Kernel
1.0 Changelogs:
-----------------
*Initial build
*Based on Quantic
*Added support for A12
*Added CASANOVA Thermals
*Added new efficient frequencies
* compiled using proton clang 13.0.0
*Upstreamed LTS to: 4.19.214
*Upstreamed CAF to LA.UM.9.12.r1-13300-SMxx50.QSSI12.0
*Added a kernel space blocker to don't allow execution of magisk root optimizers such as LawRun, FDE.AI, etc.
Installation :
Backup Boot.img and Dtbo.img
Flash the kernel
Reinstall the recovery
Clean cache and dalvik
reboot
Credits :
*Casanova for Thermal
* Quantic kernel
* Immensity kernel
* Ram potagani
* Shreyansh (the 90s guy yt (Admin))
Download link: https://sourceforge.net/projects/the-90s-kernel/
Source of my kernel: https://github.com/Xtu-Fuszx/The_90s_Kernel
Donate: https://telegra.ph/Donate-to-90s-Guy-09-07

Great job! Seems good so far

Added a kernel space blocker to don't allow execution of magisk root optimizers such as LawRun
What does that mean you can't root with magisk? That's ironic because yesterday I was talking to someone who said the makers of hentai OS don't like root or twrp.
To that I say you guys do understand most of us would rather be rooted stock than on some nonstock rom without root?
It's actually sad when open source coders make a rom and want to say you can't root because it messes it up and we can't fix it so no root. That is what we do at XDA.

Thread open again
strongst
XDA staff

Techguy777 said:
Added a kernel space blocker to don't allow execution of magisk root optimizers such as LawRun
What does that mean you can't root with magisk? That's ironic because yesterday I was talking to someone who said the makers of hentai OS don't like root or twrp.
To that I say you guys do understand most of us would rather be rooted stock than on some nonstock rom without root?
It's actually sad when open source coders make a rom and want to say you can't root because it messes it up and we can't fix it so no root. That is what we do at XDA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those are not "optimizers" they are doing worse for your device. Then you are the one that complains "x kernel its bad" just because you used one of those "optimizers" that made it bad. However no one forces you to flash anything .

EmanuelCN said:
Those are not "optimizers" they are doing worse for your device. Then you are the one that complains "x kernel its bad" just because you used one of those "optimizers" that made it bad. However no one forces you to flash anything .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't need to flash custom kernels it's built with stock source code, so it's stock kernel with a gesture or something added but generally speaking they don't perform better or have better battery life. They certainly don't do both battery and performance better than the guys that wrote the stock kernel source could do.
You guys get carried away on Xda. We appreciate anything to contribute but most developers don't do it for free they make money with donations I've seen them get thousands of dollars. That is their hope to it's only I do it for me and no one else when things don't work right.

If someone can produce a kernel that can beat a benchmark score of 713000 on AnTuTu I will be more than happy to try it.

Techguy777 said:
If someone can produce a kernel that can beat a benchmark score of 713000 on AnTuTu I will be more than happy to try it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you think antutu benchmark matters or any other score in any benchmark it means you don't really know much. The only benchmark to ever matter is UIBENCH jitter test. Where's stock kernel its garbage at as well as any other stock kernel by any manufacture not just xiaomi. The smoothness its not even comparable. Benchmark scores do not matter at all your phone can perform much better including gaming while having a lower score in benchmarks.

EmanuelCN said:
If you think antutu benchmark matters or any other score in any benchmark it means you don't really know much. The only benchmark to ever matter is UIBENCH jitter test. Where's stock kernel its garbage at as well as any other stock kernel by any manufacture not just xiaomi. The smoothness its not even comparable. Benchmark scores do not matter at all your phone can perform much better including gaming while having a lower score in benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand that Benchmarks aren't everything but it does give us a guide to go by. For example I have a S10 lite ultra and it has SD 855 gets about 489k and the Poco f3 got 713k and it does work a slight bit faster side by side opening apps and doing stuff. It's only on XDA that you hear people talking about it means nothing.
Let's not get carried away if people on Xda could build a better kernel than xiaomi or Samsung or whoever they would have to know how to write code and they don't. Xiaomi isn't waiting for their kernel source it's the other way around. You can't use Xiaomis kernel source code and than claim you have made it better performance and battery. Because I've been flashing roms and kernels now on like 20 different devices for 4 years and it never makes a big difference. The best thing a developer can do is make permissive for Samsung kernel. That truly adds something that isn't there already.
No the truth is if there are ways to say something is better or not on Android phones that doesn't show favorable results to whatever someone has built than it's looked at like crap because we don't like the results. You guys try to speak down to people like you don't know crap about anything if you think that matters. Really, I see Amd, Samsung, Google, Intel, pretty much everyone using benchmarks to show their products being 30 percent better. They probably don't know real development.
I'll tell you what what does that jitter test for and you give me your best custom kernel to show it? I'm on EU rom.
It's like best rom? Everyone is different and it depends. No everyone wants the same thing.
Stability, performance, battery there's really nothing different. The only thing that is different is if someone wants pixel rom to mimic pixel devices or OnePlus rom or Samsung one ui rom. Don't get me wrong I enjoy tweaking my devices but is anyone with A/B slots and super partition able to restore device with twrp?

Just today I seen casnova post a screenshot of Geekbench which is weird because he probably didn't realize it doesn't matter Benchmarks. But his was 900s single core and 3300 multiple core so I quickly ran Geekbench to and I scored almost the exact same thing.
Here's why I say this stuff because the so call developers on XDA have took all the fun out of it. Your not developers you take other people's work and slap your name on it while changing as little as 1 thing or sometimes nothing. Your compliers or something like that not developers. You guys belittle noobs because xda allows people that complie code to talk down to newbies who want to ask questions but the truth is that actually makes them look bad because they don't know the answer most of the time. ETAs aren't allowed because developers don't actually know if they can fix anything or if they can build again.
All of the rules are stupid and make no sense unless you make it so people have to act like developers aka compliers are someone special. Who's so smart and just does things to be nice and the donation link.
It's to the point where I just want to see all the new members stop kissing ass and tell the developers your not a developer unless you have a degree or work for a software company but if you did you wouldn't be on Xda.

The xda developers have gone to far, you guys have gotten big heads puffed up chest and think your hot stuff. It's ruined xda completely and it's not a helpful website anymore it's thousands of threads of it's already been answered search the post, nice rom dev even before they flash it. Now if you ask about a feature the doesn't work they just blow you off. That means threads are pointless for information on the software.

Guys, would it work on ArrowOS 12? Can it be flashed via sideload?

Techguy777 said:
I understand that Benchmarks aren't everything but it does give us a guide to go by. For example I have a S10 lite ultra and it has SD 855 gets about 489k and the Poco f3 got 713k and it does work a slight bit faster side by side opening apps and doing stuff. It's only on XDA that you hear people talking about it means nothing.
Let's not get carried away if people on Xda could build a better kernel than xiaomi or Samsung or whoever they would have to know how to write code and they don't. Xiaomi isn't waiting for their kernel source it's the other way around. You can't use Xiaomis kernel source code and than claim you have made it better performance and battery. Because I've been flashing roms and kernels now on like 20 different devices for 4 years and it never makes a big difference. The best thing a developer can do is make permissive for Samsung kernel. That truly adds something that isn't there already.
No the truth is if there are ways to say something is better or not on Android phones that doesn't show favorable results to whatever someone has built than it's looked at like crap because we don't like the results. You guys try to speak down to people like you don't know crap about anything if you think that matters. Really, I see Amd, Samsung, Google, Intel, pretty much everyone using benchmarks to show their products being 30 percent better. They probably don't know real development.
I'll tell you what what does that jitter test for and you give me your best custom kernel to show it? I'm on EU rom.
It's like best rom? Everyone is different and it depends. No everyone wants the same thing.
Stability, performance, battery there's really nothing different. The only thing that is different is if someone wants pixel rom to mimic pixel devices or OnePlus rom or Samsung one ui rom. Don't get me wrong I enjoy tweaking my devices but is anyone with A/B slots and super partition able to restore device with twrp?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all you have literally no clue on how a kernel works and what those modules do. There is no such thing as "building a better kernel than xiaomi, samsung, etc", no one would be ever able to make a kernel from scratch. The kernel itself firstly comes from Linux where's for our case on snapdragon Qualcomm modifies it and releases sources for each SOC then it goes to the specific manufacture that wants to create their phone and has to add the necessary code in order for their phone to work with the components they chose and usually they try to "tweak" the kernel which is literally doing worse 90% of the time. Qualcomm has a lot of stupid implementations baked into the kernel such as pl, hispeed, WALT, which are the reason the jitter its horrible with stock kernel, instead following mainline which is the best thing to be done. Benchmarks are useless because they are made to run on based on what usually the phones ship with, they are not designed to measure properly the performance of a phone therefore i have a lower score with my kernel but surprisngly jitter its 10 times better on "my' kernel, as well as normal usage and gaming too. I don't care what other devs posted about benchmakrs, i dont think my name is "casnova" or whatever, i dont talk for them i'm letting you know how it work. Also regarding "Your not developers you take other people's work and slap your name on it while changing as little as 1 thing or sometimes nothing", why dont you check github? why do you even talk without knowing what its really happening? its funny how people complain about dumb stuff, as i explained you that blocker its meant for people like you to not use x,y,z modules then to complain that the kernel is bad just because you used some random "tweaking" module and it underperforms. I don't think anyone forces you to donate, as well as barely there are any people donating, also i dont see where i ever asked on my kernel donations or anything, he's free to have a donation link in case everyone likes his work. Regarding using other's work, ever wondered why there is a thing called open source?, why wouldn't i use someone's great work in order to improve the kernel? i should do everything myself because you say so LOL. Please stop being delusional, before you ever write something on xda or anywhere else think twice. Im not here to beef with anyone i was explaining you why they block those "optimisers" that you are talking about, however you started talking about a lot of totally different things than what i said. Also if its that easy why don't you do it yourself and make your own kernel, by your analogy those "optimisers" would be bad too because how they can make a better job than qualcomm, samsung,oneplus blablabla LOL? You dont even know what they actually do. You share a lot of missinformation and you should stop. Have a nice day, i don't even know why i'm even arguing with someone like you, i wont reply to any of your answers after this.

EmanuelCN said:
First of all you have literally no clue on how a kernel works and what those modules do. There is no such thing as "building a better kernel than xiaomi, samsung, etc", no one would be ever able to make a kernel from scratch. The kernel itself firstly comes from Linux where's for our case on snapdragon Qualcomm modifies it and releases sources for each SOC then it goes to the specific manufacture that wants to create their phone and has to add the necessary code in order for their phone to work with the components they chose and usually they try to "tweak" the kernel which is literally doing worse 90% of the time. Qualcomm has a lot of stupid implementations baked into the kernel such as pl, hispeed, WALT, which are the reason the jitter its horrible with stock kernel, instead following mainline which is the best thing to be done. Benchmarks are useless because they are made to run on based on what usually the phones ship with, they are not designed to measure properly the performance of a phone therefore i have a lower score with my kernel but surprisngly jitter its 10 times better on "my' kernel, as well as normal usage and gaming too. I don't care what other devs posted about benchmakrs, i dont think my name is "casnova" or whatever, i dont talk for them i'm letting you know how it work. Also regarding "Your not developers you take other people's work and slap your name on it while changing as little as 1 thing or sometimes nothing", why dont you check github? why do you even talk without knowing what its really happening? its funny how people complain about dumb stuff, as i explained you that blocker its meant for people like you to not use x,y,z modules then to complain that the kernel is bad just because you used some random "tweaking" module and it underperforms. I don't think anyone forces you to donate, as well as barely there are any people donating, also i dont see where i ever asked on my kernel donations or anything, he's free to have a donation link in case everyone likes his work. Regarding using other's work, ever wondered why there is a thing called open source?, why wouldn't i use someone's great work in order to improve the kernel? i should do everything myself because you say so LOL. Please stop being delusional, before you ever write something on xda or anywhere else think twice. Im not here to beef with anyone i was explaining you why they block those "optimisers" that you are talking about, however you started talking about a lot of totally different things than what i said. Also if its that easy why don't you do it yourself and make your own kernel, by your analogy those "optimisers" would be bad too because how they can make a better job than qualcomm, samsung,oneplus blablabla LOL? You dont even know what they actually do. You share a lot of missinformation and you should stop. Have a nice day, i don't even know why i'm even arguing with someone like you, i wont reply to any of your answers after this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First off I have made a couple of custom roms , twrp, and no I haven't made a kernel because it doesn't matter. For instances overclocking used to be a huge deal and now you don't see that ever. It's because it never did anything you could over clock it and if you watch your CPU in a kernel app like kernel auditor or Ex manager it would run at the stock frequencies much like the CPU does now if you try to lower clock speed or max it out. I'm aware that a kernel makes the hardware on the device work mainly the CPU and GPU and every OEM has to add their source to fit it. Here's how I know it's bull crap, now developers are saying kernel is enforcing and made with this tool chain as if the kernel isn't built with enforcing from the get go on stock like that's some feature they added. Me personally not worried about security I still prefer Permissive and yes I know it weakens security but in 5 years of doing this I have never heard of anyone hacking an Android phone. Even with the source code provided it's still difficult to make changes so I don't think people who could do it are going to waste their time. The monthly security patch is not a big deal it's funny that everyone thinks that is great when next month they will tell you last months security patch has security flaws like every month before it. So basically no patch has ever been secure.
If real features were added like double tap to sleep gesture
Color display RGB control
Sound modification so you can add gain on speakers, ear piece or headphones
Those days are gone because no one knows how to do it anymore on new software. Also most kernels say better performance and battery but neither the performance is any better nor does the battery last longer so I don't see how those claims are made. Wait I know because on Xda you can claim anything and everyone just says buttery smooth and long battery life thanks Dev. Before they even flash it.

EmanuelCN said:
First of all you have literally no clue on how a kernel works and what those modules do. There is no such thing as "building a better kernel than xiaomi, samsung, etc", no one would be ever able to make a kernel from scratch. The kernel itself firstly comes from Linux where's for our case on snapdragon Qualcomm modifies it and releases sources for each SOC then it goes to the specific manufacture that wants to create their phone and has to add the necessary code in order for their phone to work with the components they chose and usually they try to "tweak" the kernel which is literally doing worse 90% of the time. Qualcomm has a lot of stupid implementations baked into the kernel such as pl, hispeed, WALT, which are the reason the jitter its horrible with stock kernel, instead following mainline which is the best thing to be done. Benchmarks are useless because they are made to run on based on what usually the phones ship with, they are not designed to measure properly the performance of a phone therefore i have a lower score with my kernel but surprisngly jitter its 10 times better on "my' kernel, as well as normal usage and gaming too. I don't care what other devs posted about benchmakrs, i dont think my name is "casnova" or whatever, i dont talk for them i'm letting you know how it work. Also regarding "Your not developers you take other people's work and slap your name on it while changing as little as 1 thing or sometimes nothing", why dont you check github? why do you even talk without knowing what its really happening? its funny how people complain about dumb stuff, as i explained you that blocker its meant for people like you to not use x,y,z modules then to complain that the kernel is bad just because you used some random "tweaking" module and it underperforms. I don't think anyone forces you to donate, as well as barely there are any people donating, also i dont see where i ever asked on my kernel donations or anything, he's free to have a donation link in case everyone likes his work. Regarding using other's work, ever wondered why there is a thing called open source?, why wouldn't i use someone's great work in order to improve the kernel? i should do everything myself because you say so LOL. Please stop being delusional, before you ever write something on xda or anywhere else think twice. Im not here to beef with anyone i was explaining you why they block those "optimisers" that you are talking about, however you started talking about a lot of totally different things than what i said. Also if its that easy why don't you do it yourself and make your own kernel, by your analogy those "optimisers" would be bad too because how they can make a better job than qualcomm, samsung,oneplus blablabla LOL? You dont even know what they actually do. You share a lot of missinformation and you should stop. Have a nice day, i don't even know why i'm even arguing with someone like you, i wont reply to any of your answers after this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I built 3 roms for 3 of my devices and I didn't start calling myself a developer because I had to get the vendor blob, kernel source, and lineage files from someone. I really think everyone just builds something or makes a flash able zip with a shell or script in it and immediately starts calling themselves a developer. I have owned the Poco f3 for a couple of weeks now and the TWRP thread is a waste of time. In the opening post it says backup and restore because they just copied and pasted the Normal twrp page. But than you search and almost nothing is being said about restore and you ask and no one will answer you and it's because it doesn't work and no one wants the devs feelings to be hurt. Well that's lovely but the point of a help thread is to discuss problems and solutions but it's became pointless the only thing threads are for is to say thanks for the software and to tell everyone that they don't spoon feed noobs to look it up and thats just stupid again that is why the Google search takes you to xda and that thread because you looked it up. Twrp would be able to backup and restore if xiaomi or Samsung made it because they would know how to make it backup slot a or active slot and restore it to inactive slot or whatever slot it needs to be because that's real development. I'm not trying to be a **** but it's gotten stupid I don't even bother looking through threads anymore because it's a serious waste of time because no one can say anything that might upset the person who made it. Well than don't make it I don't really care

a good kernel, I use it for Xiaomi.eu stable

Techguy777 said:
**** but it's gotten stupid I don't even bother looking through threads anymore because it's a serious waste of time because no one can say anything that might upset the person who made it. Well than don't make it I don't really care
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You taught me something today. I "was" addicted to that, not any more...

shreyanshwithu said:
View attachment 5448595
The 90s kernel for Pocof3 / Redmi k40 and Mi 11x
Be careful if you have any damage to your device I would not be the cause because it is your choice to install my kernel on your device.
For your reassure, each release of this kernel is verified and tested to be the most stable possible
Kratos Edition​*First initial build
*upstream to 5.15.1
*optimized for Corvus and Xdroid
*Alpha build
*fix Fastcharging
*Don’t with A12 ROMs – Until Next Update
2.0 Changelogs:
*Upstreamed LTS to: 4.19.215
*Focused on Battery and Performance
*fixed Miui not showing up kernel version
*Fixed Low brightness
*Replaced touch drivers (thanks to @Dawfuk)
*Thanks To All My Testers
*Credits :
@Dawfuk
Eclipsia kernel
Optimus Drunk Kernel
1.0 Changelogs:
-----------------
*Initial build
*Based on Quantic
*Added support for A12
*Added CASANOVA Thermals
*Added new efficient frequencies
* compiled using proton clang 13.0.0
*Upstreamed LTS to: 4.19.214
*Upstreamed CAF to LA.UM.9.12.r1-13300-SMxx50.QSSI12.0
*Added a kernel space blocker to don't allow execution of magisk root optimizers such as LawRun, FDE.AI, etc.
Installation :
Backup Boot.img and Dtbo.img
Flash the kernel
Reinstall the recovery
Clean cache and dalvik
reboot
Credits :
*Casanova for Thermal
* Quantic kernel
* Immensity kernel
* Ram potagani
* Shreyansh (the 90s guy yt (Admin))
Download link: https://sourceforge.net/projects/the-90s-kernel/
Source of my kernel: https://github.com/Xtu-Fuszx/The_90s_Kernel
Donate: https://telegra.ph/Donate-to-90s-Guy-09-07
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bro im following you on youtube. can you make your videos english or put some subtitles please. thanks

shreyanshwithu said:
View attachment 5448595
The 90s kernel for Pocof3 / Redmi k40 and Mi 11x
Be careful if you have any damage to your device I would not be the cause because it is your choice to install my kernel on your device.
For your reassure, each release of this kernel is verified and tested to be the most stable possible
Kratos Edition​*First initial build
*upstream to 5.15.1
*optimized for Corvus and Xdroid
*Alpha build
*fix Fastcharging
*Don’t with A12 ROMs – Until Next Update
2.0 Changelogs:
*Upstreamed LTS to: 4.19.215
*Focused on Battery and Performance
*fixed Miui not showing up kernel version
*Fixed Low brightness
*Replaced touch drivers (thanks to @Dawfuk)
*Thanks To All My Testers
*Credits :
@Dawfuk
Eclipsia kernel
Optimus Drunk Kernel
1.0 Changelogs:
-----------------
*Initial build
*Based on Quantic
*Added support for A12
*Added CASANOVA Thermals
*Added new efficient frequencies
* compiled using proton clang 13.0.0
*Upstreamed LTS to: 4.19.214
*Upstreamed CAF to LA.UM.9.12.r1-13300-SMxx50.QSSI12.0
*Added a kernel space blocker to don't allow execution of magisk root optimizers such as LawRun, FDE.AI, etc.
Installation :
Backup Boot.img and Dtbo.img
Flash the kernel
Reinstall the recovery
Clean cache and dalvik
reboot
Credits :
*Casanova for Thermal
* Quantic kernel
* Immensity kernel
* Ram potagani
* Shreyansh (the 90s guy yt (Admin))
Download link: https://sourceforge.net/projects/the-90s-kernel/
Source of my kernel: https://github.com/Xtu-Fuszx/The_90s_Kernel
Donate: https://telegra.ph/Donate-to-90s-Guy-09-07
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can i use this kernel for gaming ?

When I install stock miui, next LOS and my apps , every time I have different results with kernels. I do not understand how it is possible to have always different results for the same software for next tries.
It is third installation of all in my poco f3 and after testing some kernels, this one is a winner and consumes only 0.15% battery every hour during the night. Thank you for the kernel v2.
Edit.
The installation of this kernel reinstalled default LOS recovery. When I installed TWRP and again rooted the result was killed. I see 0.56% during night and this is worse result than own LOS kernel has. I lost a time for this kernel I afraid.