Related
Is this one Tenker, 60W Adapter with PD/QC4.0 truly quick charge 4.0 certified or just QC 4.0 compatible?
What QC 4.0 chrager would you advice?
I'd prefer one with 3-4 USB ports, capable of charging 3 phones/tablets at once
I suggest you check out the Razer charger. They are a very trusted, high end company.
Razer Wall Charger for Phone https://www.amazon.com/dp/B077968S1F/
This phone supports QC 4.0? I looked on official LG site and it only says 3.0.
id3alistic said:
This phone supports QC 4.0? I looked on official LG site and it only says 3.0.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://www.qualcomm.com/media/documents/files/quick-charge-device-list.pdf
id3alistic said:
This phone supports QC 4.0? I looked on official LG site and it only says 3.0.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct, but it supports QC4.0 (as confirmed by others). May be two possible reasons 1) Bad marketing 2) The included charger is only QC3.0 (Why LG, why...its you flagship phone, show some respect and love)
It says
"These devices contain the hardware necessary to achieve Quick Charge 4/4+. It is at the device manufacturer’s
discretion to fully enable this feature."
I do hope it's enabled by default.
aerowild said:
Correct, but it supports QC4.0 (as confirmed by others). May be two possible reasons 1) Bad marketing 2) The included charger is only QC3.0 (Why LG, why...its you flagship phone, show some respect and love)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well QC4.0 chargers are almost none existant, that's why
A better QC 3.0 charger than the original (with more amps / 12 volt) can decrease charging time?
Hi
Has anyone tried this charger ?
I did not find any Videos on Youtube or orther sites selling it
What got me Interested in this charger was it has 2 Usb ports
1 of QC 3.0 & orther of QC 4.0
do not know if it works
See it here -
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/USB...e946-4a73-b356-c931053a86c8&priceBeautifyAB=0
Cheaper at Amazon
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07BS8LXW9/ref=s9_acsd_hps_bw_c_x_1_w?th=1
Found One more -
https://www.amazon.com/Charger-Deli...fkmr1&keywords=Huawei+QC+4.0+Charger+60w+dual
Seems by Next year we will have QC 4.0
Usb Quick Charge 4 ports
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07BNG29CG/ref=pd_luc_rh_sspa_dk_huc_pt_sub_1?psc=1
Please Share if you get any Info on this or any Similar DUAL Quick Charger like this
Thanks
mikimay said:
It says
"These devices contain the hardware necessary to achieve Quick Charge 4/4+. It is at the device manufacturer’s
discretion to fully enable this feature."
I do hope it's enabled by default.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah the 845 supports it but i dont think LG has enabled it in firmware.
Im just excited we have fast wireless charging thats useable.
Kind of like bands, the radio will do them all but most are firmware specific.
Sent from my LM-G710 using Tapatalk
before buy qc 4.0 charger i think the first step is create a mod that enable quickcharge when screen is on and possibility of increase max charging current to 3 amp
notice that when screen is on max current is around 1A and when is off is around 2.2A
so i think is useless buy an expensive charger when the firmware is limited to these values
darix96 said:
before buy qc 4.0 charger i think the first step is create a mod that enable quickcharge when screen is on and possibility of increase max charging current to 3 amp
notice that when screen is on max current is around 1A and when is off is around 2.2A
so i think is useless buy an expensive charger when the firmware is limited to these values
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly, we need a custom kernel to have the charging amperes to be changed manually which is really cool. If we have a really cool custom kernel, the CPU governors should preset customisable governors (for smooth performance) and for the charge values, just look for a 3A charger, with the Kernel Adiutor change the values. Meaning the benefits of rooting gives us the complete freedom of our Android! If a 4A charger is detected by the kernel manager app, the charge values should show as "upto 4A even with the screen on! Then no need to be jealous of Dash Charging of One Plus!
so... if u bought a quick charge 4.0 brick... will it charge the g7 faster than QC 3.0?
akshaythakor said:
so... if u bought a quick charge 4.0 brick... will it charge the g7 faster than QC 3.0?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
BTT....I'd like to know this too.
darix96 said:
before buy qc 4.0 charger i think the first step is create a mod that enable quickcharge when screen is on and possibility of increase max charging current to 3 amp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why? So G7 could pave the ways of Galaxy Note 7 and if not burn in flames then at least loose 50% of battery capacity in half a year? Sorry I'm not enlisting to shoot myself in the foot and throw expensive $700 phone in half a year to garbage can just because
Quick Charge 4.0 doesn't bump currents to 3A, it's not working that way. It bumps voltages to 20V instead
Billy Madison said:
Why? So G7 could pave the ways of Galaxy Note 7 and if not burn in flames then at least loose 50% of battery capacity in half a year? Sorry I'm not enlisting to shoot myself in the foot and throw expensive $700 phone in half a year to garbage can just because
Quick Charge 4.0 doesn't bump currents to 3A, it's not working that way. It bumps voltages to 20V instead
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, and no, i think the only one "problem" (or protection?) is the limit at 1 amp when the screen is unlocked, 20 volt i think isn't so useful if we use a good usb cable
darix96 said:
Yes, and no, i think the only one "problem" (or protection?) is the limit at 1 amp when the screen is unlocked, 20 volt i think isn't so useful if we use a good usb cable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But, even Samsung said and officially stated that after Note 7 fiasco they made same limit of 1A when screen is unlocked to prevent fast battery degrading. Samsung knows better then XDA uses, I think
Billy Madison said:
Why? So G7 could pave the ways of Galaxy Note 7 and if not burn in flames then at least loose 50% of battery capacity in half a year? Sorry I'm not enlisting to shoot myself in the foot and throw expensive $700 phone in half a year to garbage can just because
Quick Charge 4.0 doesn't bump currents to 3A, it's not working that way. It bumps voltages to 20V instead
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not 20 volts. That's way too much for a battery. It's actually 9v + 2 amps. 20v it's mostly for Tables i think.
LameMonster82 said:
It's not 20 volts. That's way too much for a battery. It's actually 9v + 2 amps. 20v it's mostly for Tables i think.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
9 Volts isn't even Quick Charge 3.0, it's legacy QC 2.0.
QC 3.0 & 4.0 compatible phones can get charged from 20V, 12V, 9V and 5V
This is the one I use:
https://www.aukey.com/products/quick-charge-3-0-wall-charger-pa-t9
But if I plan ahead, I try not to use it very often. It works well, it's just that the long-term health of my battery benefits from slower charging.
Hello guys .
Need to know about the charging info cause my note 5 pro is charging at a speed of 970 ma on quick charge 3.0
As I don't know how much are the charging rates of QC 3.0 and the normal charging rate of the normal stock charger .
Thanks in advance
QC 3 uses lower power, but higher current to charge devices.
Sent from my Redmi Note 5 using Tapatalk
I know the phone hasn't hit the streets yet, HOWEVER, does anyone know of any cheap 45W chargers that will be compatible with the Note 10+?? I know probably any 45W charger would do, but are any better than the others?
The is the one I was looking at...
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B071911MG5/ref=sspa_dk_detail_3?psc=1&pd_rd_i=B071911MG5&pd_rd_w=MVY9A&pf_rd_p=8dbd62ec-d8d3-48e5-b85d-16f701719d81&pd_rd_wg=iEfBW&pf_rd_r=S5BV307RMXWYY7Y4JVYK&pd_rd_r=1b671bb1-6734-47bb-aa06-9d2159dac970
Saw this recommended on AP
https://www.amazon.com/Nekteck-Cert...y-MacBook/dp/B071Z959VX/?tag=androidpolice-20
I have one that i just got. But its a multi voltage one. Goes up to 15v.
I just dont know if it will do the super fast charging or jist fast charging.
I will find out when the phone comes
i need a 45w charging power bank.
Does 45W destroy the battery over time?
Personally, i'm looking for a charger with at least two and preferably three 45w+ Type-C PD ports, with a couple of 18w USB-A ports as well.
Anker have the Atom PD4, but it seems to be as rare as rocking horse poop at the moment.
I have the Huawei MateBook X Pro laptop and it has a 65w intelligent charger.
It fast charges my S10+ perfectly so I'm going to try it once I get my Note 10+ before buying a new one.
stakan said:
Does 45W destroy the battery over time?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no.
Before I switched back to the iPhone, this is what I loved about my Note 9, being able to use my 87w Apple MacBook Pro charger to charge my Note.
Is the Samsung official 45w charger that will be coming out soon special in some way to trigger this fast charging mode? Or do any 45w or higher chargers work?
Also, does anybody know if the Note 10+ supports the smart charging logic that Apple has in iOS 13, where it doesn't top off the phone every time (to prolong overall battery health)?
I have a 40W charger from my old huawei mate20 pro however it outputs 10V 4A max which isn't a standard thing. Will the note10+ utilize that kind of rating or will I be stuck with the charger's lower rating which is 18W (9V, 2A).
Edit: Guess no one would actually be able to answer this right now, I'll just have to try it myself when the phone arrives.
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
As soon as I get my phone I'll try the power adaptater from my dual wireless charger. This is a 45w brick....
Update on the 45w power brick..
https://www.androidpolice.com/2019/08/13/galaxy-note10-plus-45w-charging/
Guys, I bought this Wireless Charger Pad Slim EP-P1100T, to use on my Note 10 Plus, the information says it has a fast charge, but when I put my device on it, fast charge information does not appear even though it is enabled on the cell phone, is it really so? Android 10 does not show the message?
I think you should use Quick charge 3.0 charging head not the samsung 25w head with it , anyway even if you use the suitable charger with it Note 10 plus automatically shut off fast wireless charging when using slim pad for more that 20% of fast charging because of heat issues since slim charging pads don't have cooling fans and they heat up very quickly
I have one of these also, the only fast charger that enables fast charge with that wireless charger is my old Note 9 charger, it provides the 18w QC2.0 the wireless charger needs.
willhemmens said:
I have one of these also, the only fast charger that enables fast charge with that wireless charger is my old Note 9 charger, it provides the 18w QC2.0 the wireless charger needs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using the charger that came with Note 10 + ...
Is that why the phone doesn't charge fast charge with the pad?
Hades said:
I'm using the charger that came with Note 10 + ...
Is that why the phone doesn't charge fast charge with the pad?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, this charger was designed for the previous generation of phones (S9, Note9 ect) which included a compatible charger. Samsung confirms this here: https://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/m...nes/wireless-charger-pad-slim-ep-p1100bbegww/
Samsung doesn't use Quick Charge technology since it's a Qualcomm only feature and Samsung uses its own chipset which isn't Snapdragon.
Instead, it uses Power Delivery which is a standard and better in all aspects.
Nastrahl said:
Samsung doesn't use Quick Charge technology since it's a Qualcomm only feature and Samsung uses its own chipset which isn't Snapdragon.
Instead, it uses Power Delivery which is a standard and better in all aspects.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not entirely true, Samsung definitely do sell phones with the Qualcomm Snapdragon SOC and the 15W charging on most of their previous phones (S6, S7, S8 and S9 generations) was QC2.0 or QC2.0 compatible. This is why I am able to fast charge my Exynos Note 9 at full 15W with a QC3.0 charger.
USB Power Delivery is good but it's just another charging protocol, later versions of Qualcomm Quick Charge are also USB-PD compatible.
willhemmens said:
That's not entirely true, Samsung definitely do sell phones with the Qualcomm Snapdragon SOC and the 15W charging on most of their previous phones (S6, S7, S8 and S9 generations) was QC2.0 or QC2.0 compatible. This is why I am able to fast charge my Exynos Note 9 at full 15W with a QC3.0 charger.
USB Power Delivery is good but it's just another charging protocol, later versions of Qualcomm Quick Charge are also USB-PD compatible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's right it is, but there's more.
It's not just an other charging protocol, it's an USB standard, that's means all USB ports will have it by default.
Quick charge is proprietary licensed and will be dead soon because there's no use of paying licence for nothing.
And it's not the same at all. Power Delivery is made for dynamically adjusting current intensity and tension depending of the device you plug in and battery level, for them to take only what it needs.
Quick charge isn't, that's why you need dedicated QC ports on chargers.
It's easy for QC to be "compliant" if it shares one similar spec, but it's useless since all next USB ports will use USB-PD.
And that how it worked before, with fast charging, you only had to take in consideration that the output specs and the chargers is equal or higher to the input specs of the battery to get fast charge, but it's risky for the battery.
It may appear silly, but for efficiency and durability, lithium ion battery should not be charged at the same current and intensity at all levels and that's at least one reason why it's important.
Nastrahl said:
That's right it is, but there's more.
It's not just an other charging protocol, it's an USB standard, that's means all USB ports will have it by default.
Quick charge is proprietary licensed and will be dead soon because there's no use of paying licence for nothing.
And it's not the same at all. Power Delivery is made for dynamically adjusting current intensity and tension depending of the device you plug in and battery level, for them to take only what it needs.
Quick charge isn't, that's why you need dedicated QC ports on chargers.
It's easy for QC to be "compliant" if it shares one similar spec, but it's useless since all next USB ports will use USB-PD.
And that how it worked before, with fast charging, you only had to take in consideration that the output specs and the chargers is equal or higher to the input specs of the battery to get fast charge, but it's risky for the battery.
It may appear silly, but for efficiency and durability, lithium ion battery should not be charged at the same current and intensity at all levels and that's at least one reason why it's important.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I disagree but there doesn't seem to be any point in telling you that you're wrong.
Does anyone know if the charger poco f3 comes with supports quick charge 3+ that the phone also supports?
Not sure I follow your question.
The stock charger support quick charge 3.0+, the chipset support quick charge 5, but the phone charging is limited to 33w.
Nemix77 said:
Not sure I follow your question.
The stock charger support quick charge 3.0+, the chipset support quick charge 5, but the phone charging is limited to 33w.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The phone comes as 33w quick charge 3+. My question was whether the 33w charger in the phone box charges with the quick charge 3+ protocol. I cant say it more simply than that.
When checked via CIT hardware test, it shows PD protocol.
Nemix77 said:
When checked via CIT hardware test, it shows PD protocol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whats PD?
Pd is power delivery
I think the charger attached is using everything poco f3 is capable. Very fast charging speed.
From what I heard from another thread the Poco F3 has a usb 2 port with extra pinout for 33W PD communication with the charger
Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I just found it through a search. From what I read, the QC system pays a royalty to Qualcomm because it is their proprietary technology, while PD is royalty free. The F3 has QC instead of PD. QC is much more efficient and produces less heat when charging a battery from what I read.
In the long run, try to use the QC charger that comes with the F3 to prolong the battery life (i.e. less heat generation while charging - heat's the real battery killer)
Hope this helps someone . . .
qu4k3r said:
Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I just found it through a search. From what I read, the QC system pays a royalty to Qualcomm because it is their proprietary technology, while PD is royalty free. The F3 has QC instead of PD. QC is much more efficient and produces less heat when charging a battery from what I read.
In the long run, try to use the QC charger that comes with the F3 to prolong the battery life (i.e. less heat generation while charging - heat's the real battery killer)
Hope this helps someone . . .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I only QC charge my Poco F3 and confirm that is cooler than PD.