Develop Bugs

[REQUEST] CM10 File Manager

http://androidcommunity.com/cm-file...genmod-10-root-access-mode-included-20121101/
Anyone willing to extract the apk?

TONY206 said:
http://androidcommunity.com/cm-file...genmod-10-root-access-mode-included-20121101/
Anyone willing to extract the apk?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here you go. I just pulled the apk, no promises it works.

=_= damn it I downloaded the nightly version and someone else posted it... 9_9
G1→N1→NS→GN→N⁴

im unable to go into the root folder .. only able to see the "sd-card" partition .. anyone ?
nvm solved

-Jesco- said:
im unable to go into the root folder .. only able to see the "sd-card" partition .. anyone ?
nvm solved
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol how?
G1→N1→NS→GN→N⁴

iGoogleNexus said:
Lol how?
G1→N1→NS→GN→N⁴
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you go to Settings, then General, you can set the Access mode to Root Access mode or Prompt User mode... both of those will allow you to browse the root directory.

tehgeekguy said:
Here you go. I just pulled the apk, no promises it works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! It works!

nice overall UI, but I don't like that it does't display app icons or pic thumbnails

druhaul said:
nice overall UI, but I don't like that it does't display app icons or pic thumbnails
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that, as a basic file manager, it does a really nice job and looks good. I personally prefer Solid Explorer, especially the dual panes and drag/drop ability, but to each his own.

[USERSTYLE/SCRIPT] XDA Forum Sidepanel Hider

What Is This?
New XDA 2015 theme is great and I love it. Too bad, my screen is not that big. This is a huge problem for me. Every post, every thread, every forum, you name it, all the contents are squashed to 30%-40% smaller due to the sidepanel on the right. So I look out for the right css ( yes only css ) to hide the sidepanel. And it works for both Light and Dark XDA2015 theme.
Screenshots
Download
I posted it on my Github. Simply click Raw to install if you have Greasemonkey or Tampermonkey installed on your browser.
Changelog
10-17-17 - Fixed wrong match pattern causing some wont be able to run the script on xda. Credit @tgp1994.
01-01-17 - Fixed script matching condition cannot find the right xda forum url. Thanks for the report @No1VIPER.
06-17-16 - Fixed script not working on recent tampermonkey/greasemonkey updates. Thanks for the report @Salty Wagyu.
12-01-14 - Fixed script not working on FireFox. Just remove the old script and reclick the Raw link above. Thanks @Gabriel51 for reporting.
FAQ
Q: Is this working for other theme?
A: I made this for both light and dark xda2015 theme. 2010 and 2013 doesn't need this.
Q: I found a page with sidepanel is still there!
A: Let me know, post a link to the page and I'll try to fix it.
Q: Are the ads removed?
A: No, but my script is for sidepanel, there's one or two ads on sidepanel. I tuned off adblock for XDA, that's my way supporting XDA.
Q: Can I check the source code?
A: It's available on my Github.
Q: Are there any risks?
A: You can always check the code to make sure it's clean.
Thanks to : @GermainZ for the original XDA Dark script. It took me a few minutes to make my own script yet it's not working so well. With his script, I just need 10 seconds to edit the css part.

This is fantastic, thanks so much!
P.S. I see you're enjoying my XDA Devs avatar template & fonts, eh?

thenookieforlife3 said:
This is fantastic, thanks so much!
P.S. I see you're enjoying my XDA Devs avatar template & fonts, eh?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hah! small screen? [emoji23]
No problem bro, thanks to you too for the avatar. [emoji16]

anazhd said:
Hah! small screen? [emoji23]
No problem bro, thanks to you too for the avatar. [emoji16]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Small screen indeed.

Very nice. Tried and it works fine!

How do you install this script and where?
I'm glad the dark theme was mentioned, I was getting a tan off this 32" monitor while on xda.

@Gabriel51,
To use the script, install either Greasemonkey or Tampermonkey on your web browser; then, click here to install the script.
Enjoy! :good:

thenookieforlife3 said:
@Gabriel51,
To use the script, install either Greasemonkey or Tampermonkey on your weh browser; then, click here to install the script.
Enjoy! :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I assume your talking about Firefox?
I assume there is a place in the program Greasemonkey or Tampermonkey to install the script?
I see it's automatic with Greasemonkey, Thanks
It did remove the column at the right, but this part of the page stayed the same. Is there a way to expand this area?

Gabriel51 said:
I assume your talking about Firefox?
I assume there is a place in the program Greasemonkey or Tampermonkey to install the script?
I see it's automatic with Greasemonkey, Thanks
It did remove the column at the right, but this part of the page stayed the same. Is there a way to expand this area?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did a test on firefox and yeah it's broken now. chrome is still working fine tho. I will fix it if I can. :good:
edit : fixed. easy one, i forgot to force it using !important

Yep that did it.
Thanks...

Gabriel51 said:
Yep that did it.
Thanks...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
glad it works. thanks for pointing that out :good:

Does it work with Scriptish? I've installed, disabled all blockers, No-scripts ect but still panel is no hidden.
I made quick test and in Scriptish i won't work, but in Greasemonkey yes.

Tried it in Tampermonkey but it doesn't remove the side panel. Does the script need updating, or is there any newer alternatives?

Salty Wagyu said:
Tried it in Tampermonkey but it doesn't remove the side panel. Does the script need updating, or is there any newer alternatives?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tampermonkey/greasemonkey must have changed something, I will have a quick look and will update later.
edit: Okay I pushed a small update on the script. It's working fine on me now.

@anazhd It's not working again. Can you take a look at when you get a chance please?

No1VIPER said:
@anazhd It's not working again. Can you take a look at when you get a chance please?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright. I'll check it as soon as I'm free.

Fixed, thanks for the report @No1VIPER

No problem. Thanks for the quick fix.

When I click on RAW, I get an error message "Impossible to analyze the script" ?

ChefChaudart said:
When I click on RAW, I get an error message "Impossible to analyze the script" ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's odd. Anyway, just head on to my gist and try clicking raw from there.

[WIP][XPOSED]Trying to find a Lollipop FIX

Hi guys, like you know xposed for Android 5 on our device break some system app like LGCover and LGWeather. This because the new Xposed use some binary built from the AOSP source that don't work with the above apks that contain an encrypted classes.dex ( AES128-CBC ).
Since decrypt that classes is quite impossible i started a different approach. So i looked inside the dalvik-cache where all the dex built by the compiler are stored.
Theese classes contains also the original classes.dex code.
example: /data/dalvik-cache/arm/[email protected] @....dex
Structure:
USELESS CODE
CLASSES.DEX ( that start with the magic dex.035 )
USELESS CODE
Header of the classes.dex
Offset.............Size...........Description
0x0................8................'Magic' value: "dex\n009\0"
0x8................4................Checksum
0xC...............20...............SHA-1 Signature
0x20..............4................Length of file in bytes ( in Little endian and hex value )
....
Getting that class is quite simple when you know how the dex header is formatted so i cut off the useless code and got the original classes.dex that can be decompiled with baksmali and used inside the apk.
Unfortunately this method doesn't work for the dex that were encrypted. Or at least, I'm missing the last step because there's something wrong with the code in this extrapolated class since the SHA1 signature appears to be wrong and consecutively also the Checksum are incorrect.
So, from my point of view we have 2 possible scenario:
1- the length of the classes that we can find in the header is wrong; ( most probable for me )
2- the code of the dex has been changed by the system.
Wish you can suggest me some ideas.
@suljo94 @P_Toti pls check this and tell me what you think. Tnx.

Skin1980 said:
methode 1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
could you check if an system service is activated when the lgcover apk is called(to decrypt), if not the key might be saved in the app source code (might be obfuscated)

suljo94 said:
could you check if an system service is activated when the lgcover apk is called(to decrypt), if not the key might be saved in the app source code (might be obfuscated)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes probably the code is obfuscated... might try with Ida pro and a dedicated plugin
Sent from my SM-N910F using XDA Free mobile app

Skin1980 said:
Yes probably the code is obfuscated... might try with Ida pro and a dedicated plugin
Sent from my SM-N910F using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am sorry that I can't help(ffor now), this week is an vacation and I as a poor student have to work to pay off those expensive books
ontopic: @jcase said he would look into it in the other thread, maybe he found something intressting in the meanwhile

suljo94 said:
I am sorry that I can't help(ffor now), this week is an vacation and I as a poor student have to work to pay off those expensive books
ontopic: @jcase said he would look into it in the other thread, maybe he found something intressting in the meanwhile
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well... with @jcase all is possible !
Sent from my SM-N910F using XDA Free mobile app

Skin1980 said:
Well... with @jcase all is possible !
Sent from my SM-N910F using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so I found a system service that gets called when the lgsmartcover app crashes to many times. the system restarts it together with lgcover. it is part of lgcover so I am hopping lg was so stupid to save the key in the same file as the encrypted container

suljo94 said:
I am sorry that I can't help(ffor now), this week is an vacation and I as a poor student have to work to pay off those expensive books
ontopic: @jcase said he would look into it in the other thread, maybe he found something intressting in the meanwhile
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Skin1980 said:
Well... with @jcase all is possible !
Sent from my SM-N910F using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its just encrypted, easiest route is to snag from the cache and deodex as someone said above, if yall really need something to decrypt it ill look at again when i have time

jcase said:
Its just encrypted, easiest route is to snag from the cache and deodex as someone said above, if yall really need something to decrypt it ill look at again when i have time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would be great... tnx a lot!
Sent from my SM-N910F using XDA Free mobile app

jcase said:
Its just encrypted, easiest route is to snag from the cache and deodex as someone said above, if yall really need something to decrypt it ill look at again when i have time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you tell us why the SHA1 signature is incorrect?

suljo94 said:
Could you tell us why the SHA1 signature is incorrect?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
incorrect? Which sha1? in the siguatre, or in the dex header?

jcase said:
incorrect? Which sha1? in the siguatre, or in the dex header?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dex header(see op)

suljo94 said:
Dex header(see op)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
meh who cares, the sha1 doesnt matter, just fix the alder32 checksum, or correct them both.

suljo94 said:
Dex header(see op)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably the sha1 is added before the obfuscation method.
Sent from my SM-N910F using XDA Free mobile app

Skin1980 said:
Probably the sha1 is added before the obfuscation method.
Sent from my SM-N910F using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you salvage th whole classes.dex or just partially?
and is recalculating the sha1 and alder32 an option (if you salavaged it completely)
can we use dexguard for deobfuscation?
how did you open the file? I can't dex2jar it because it keeps saying that it isn't a dex file.
so many questions......

suljo94 said:
did you salvage th whole classes.dex or just partially?
and is recalculating the sha1 and alder32 an option (if you salavaged it completely)
can we use dexguard for deobfuscation?
how did you open the file? I can't dex2jar it because it keeps saying that it isn't a dex file.
so many questions......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try to look into the classes dex with an hex editor, it's encrypted and that's why you can't use tool like that on the original dex.
If you want play, this is the dex i extracted from the dalvik-cache of the LGweather apk:
https://mega.co.nz/#!DsRHQaBL!YInp8fsaRpzZ3dbHogbNytWZfzedF9Le_PndvnmhSQs
The software i tryed fail to decompile it but maybe you are more lucky

Skin1980 said:
try to look into the classes dex with an hex editor, it's encrypted and that's why you can't use tool like that on the original dex.
If you want play, this is the dex i extracted from the dalvik-cache of the LGweather apk:
https://mega.co.nz/#!DsRHQaBL!YInp8fsaRpzZ3dbHogbNytWZfzedF9Le_PndvnmhSQs
The software i tryed fail to decompile it but maybe you are more lucky
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
some surfing aroud caused me to find which file decrypts lgcover it is the libgalmond.so file
the colprit it contains some interesting code "adler inflation"
@jcase it has been 2 months and I tried a few things but since you know more about this could you please tell me how to get the correct adler32 checksum? maybe for lets say 1 of those cheap wines you like

suljo94 said:
some surfing aroud caused me to find which file decrypts lgcover it is the libgalmond.so file
the colprit it contains some interesting code "adler inflation"
@jcase it has been 2 months and I tried a few things but since you know more about this could you please tell me how to get the correct adler32 checksum? maybe for lets say 1 of those cheap wines you like
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tim Strazzere and I may be talking about it at qualcom next week, wait and see if our slides cover it.

jcase said:
Tim Strazzere and I may be talking about it at qualcom next week, wait and see if our slides cover it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so I got the slides and I am starting to think that the problem could be that xposed links app_process32 to app_process32_xposed and that the shared library gets injected into the wrong file (app_process32)

how to change hardware device name

hey guys,
this might be a more broader android question, but either way: is there a way to change the hardware device name of a device?
i.e. my issue is the following - i use the "good for work" application for my work emails. My company basically has every manufacturer added to their approved list (HTC, Samsung, even Nexus devices work no problem). Now that I have my sweet OP3, I get the below error message (pic attached)
"the device hardware version is 'oneplus a3000 android 6.0.1' and is not permitted. Install the application on a permitted device."
now - before you tell me to go to my network admins and have the device added - I can't do that for reasons I won't go into here. Basically i want to understand if there's a way to change certain files on the phone that will make this application think it's a nexus device and clear it.
I tried editing the build.prop file (using twrp and adb - since I don't have root) to remove all mention of oneplus, etc. and replacing with "nexus" or something else (used the build.prop file from my 5x for reference). But the app still does not work and the OP3 still shows the model as One Plus 3 in the "about phone" section. This is really fascinating to me. What is driving this device's identity?
Appreciate any thoughts/suggestions you might have.

Try xposed mods... I think it is possible

Wrong forum.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3000 using XDA-Developers mobile app

wrong section.
post this in Q&A

@piotrus22, If you correctly modified your build prop then it's almost impossible to come as Oneplus name in about section of setting.
as far as I know the name in about section is read from build prop.
can you provide link to your modified build.prop file so i can see what's a problem.
Have you applied correct permissions (rw-r--r-- or 0644) to build prop after side loading

Go to your Bluetooth settings, select the menu, and Rename this device.

JumboMan said:
@piotrus22, If you correctly modified your build prop then it's almost impossible to come as Oneplus name in about section of setting.
as far as I know the name in about section is read from build prop.
can you provide link to your modified build.prop file so i can see what's a problem.
Have you applied correct permissions (rw-r--r-- or 0644) to build prop after side loading
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks @JumboMan. attached are both build.props (edited and non-edited). I ran the command "adb shell chmod 644 /system/build.prop" after I pushed the file onto the phone. I believe it worked because I added the line about LCD density (ro.sf.lcd_density=420) and the density did indeed change. Also - I am able to view the updated build.prop in a file browser when I open the phone with the changes I've made.
...still confused...

piotrus22 said:
thanks @JumboMan. attached are both build.props (edited and non-edited). I ran the command "adb shell chmod 644 /system/build.prop" after I pushed the file onto the phone. I believe it worked because I added the line about LCD density (ro.sf.lcd_density=420) and the density did indeed change. Also - I am able to view the updated build.prop in a file browser when I open the phone with the changes I've made.
...still confused...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have carefully inspected build.prop file and i found that build.prop doesn't have "ro.product.model" line . That's why you are not able to change device name.
So if you have to change device name you have to manually add above line with whatever device name you want and push file to phone and apply proper permissions
e.g ro.product.model=device name you want
In your case above line will look like ro.product.model=Nexus 5x
Though not required,change lines containing OnePlus to your custom device name

JumboMan said:
I have carefully inspected build.prop file and i found that build.prop doesn't have "ro.product.model" line . That's why you are not able to change device name.
So if you have to change device name you have to manually add above line with whatever device name you want and push file to phone and apply proper permissions
e.g ro.product.model=device name you want
In your case above line will look like ro.product.model=Nexus 5x
Though not required,change lines containing OnePlus to your custom device name
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok - making progress here. the model name now shows up as Nexus 5x, but when the computer recognizes the phone it still shows up as ONEPLUS A3000... and what about the build? I've tweaked everything I can think of but still can't change the build number from "ONEPLUS A3000_16_0705"
any ideas?

piotrus22 said:
ok - making progress here. the model name now shows up as Nexus 5x, but when the computer recognizes the phone it still shows up as ONEPLUS A3000... and what about the build? I've tweaked everything I can think of but still can't change the build number from "ONEPLUS A3000_16_0705"
any ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
now I think I'm going out of ideas.
I think you have to ask some experienced dev

JumboMan said:
now I think I'm going out of ideas.
I think you have to ask some experienced dev
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how do I do that? just hope one of them sees this post? LOL

piotrus22 said:
how do I do that? just hope one of them sees this post? LOL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yesterday I researched a lot about your question but I only found half answer.
Now Today I'm back with more build prop lines that will 100% solve your question.
This time I tested myself first before posting to confirm the changes
So here is a Trick
=====
1.To change Model Number
ro.product.model=Nexus 5x
2.To Change Build Number
ro.build.display.id=Nexus 5x
ro.build.display.full_id=Nexus 5x
ro.build.id.hardware=Nexus 5x
=====
Note - value "Nexus 5x" is used just as an example.
You change this value to anything you want.

JumboMan said:
Yesterday I researched a lot about your question but I only found half answer.
Now Today I'm back with more build prop lines that will 100% solve your question.
This time I tested myself first before posting to confirm the changes
So here is a Trick
=====
1.To change Model Number
ro.product.model=Nexus 5x
2.To Change Build Number
ro.build.display.id=Nexus 5x
ro.build.display.full_id=Nexus 5x
ro.build.id.hardware=Nexus 5x
=====
Note - value "Nexus 5x" is used just as an example.
You change this value to anything you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you sir are amazing. just tried it and it worked. will test it out to see if it causes other issues. may I buy you a beer?

piotrus22 said:
may I buy you a beer?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me Thanks=Beer, so thanks are sufficient

JumboMan said:
For me Thanks=Beer, so thanks are sufficient
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok @JumboMan, so now my phone won't save video. Basically when I try to take a video with the camera app, it hangs up on the "saving" section. Then the only way to get the camera running again is to reboot. I can't believe this is related to what I did in the build.prop files right?

The driver names will ever be the real device name. So...
:thumbup:
Sent from my XT320 using xda premium

piotrus22 said:
Ok @JumboMan, so now my phone won't save video. Basically when I try to take a video with the camera app, it hangs up on the "saving" section. Then the only way to get the camera running again is to reboot. I can't believe this is related to what I did in the build.prop files right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It may be due to build prop changes but I'm not sure. can you use 3rd party camera app check for your problem. or it only occurs with stock camera.

JumboMan said:
It may be due to build prop changes but I'm not sure. can you use 3rd party camera app check for your problem. or it only occurs with stock camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Third party camera app has the same problem. Will revert to original build prop and see if that fixes the issue. Will report back.

JumboMan said:
For me Thanks=Beer, so thanks are sufficient
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dethfull said:
The driver names will ever be the real device name. So...
:thumbup:
Sent from my XT320 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@Dethfull do you know which items in the build prop coordinate to the drivers for the camera?

ok so I think I fixed it. I played around with the build.prop file and it appears changing the ro.product.manufacturer =OnePlus back from Nexus5 did the trick. Camera seems to be much faster than before and videos can save now, and the Good app still works.
Will update if things change but hopefully not!

File Request

Can anyone share '/system/etc/fonts.xml'? It would be greatly appreciated!

Here ya go ...

stevemw said:
Here ya go ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you so much!

elmkzgirxp said:
Thank you so much!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem. Did you somehow unintentionally change the file?

stevemw said:
No problem. Did you somehow unintentionally change the file?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah, I needed it to port Google Sans for the Pixel Launcher 'At A Glance' widget. And now it's working!
I don't have a Pixel 2 btw, hence the request. Thanks again!

elmkzgirxp said:
Nah, I needed it to port Google Sans for the Pixel Launcher 'At A Glance' widget. And now it's working!
I don't have a Pixel 2 btw, hence the request. Thanks again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem Glad to help.

stevemw said:
No problem Glad to help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you mind if I request another file? If I could get the files in /system/vendor/overlay, that would be wonderful!

How are you getting these files without root?
If you have root, how did you obtain it?
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk

abuttino said:
How are you getting these files without root?
If you have root, how did you obtain it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Extracting system files doesn't require root as long as the permissions are rw-r-r (0644). To extract it, you can use any file manager that lets you browse the root folder. From there you can copy the files to the internal storage.

elmkzgirxp said:
Do you mind if I request another file? If I could get the files in /system/vendor/overlay, that would be wonderful!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here you go...

stevemw said:
Here you go...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You never fail to deliver. Thanks a lot!

abuttino said:
How are you getting these files without root?
If you have root, how did you obtain it?
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
elmkzgirxp said:
Extracting system files doesn't require root as long as the permissions are rw-r-r (0644). To extract it, you can use any file manager that lets you browse the root folder. From there you can copy the files to the internal storage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These files are world-readable. (0xx4) -- I've never rooted my Google phones and tablets.
---------- Post added at 05:22 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:11 AM ----------
elmkzgirxp said:
You never fail to deliver. Thanks a lot!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any time!

stevemw said:
Any time!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On that note, can I request the SystemUIGoogle in /system/priv-app too? It seems that the quick settings icons' edges are rounded compared to AOSP's sharp edges.

The directory is too large to upload, even after breaking the zip file into 4 pieces. Do you have an account (Dropbox, Google Drive, etc.) I can send them to? Or a system I could ftp the zip file?

stevemw said:
The directory is too large to upload, even after breaking the zip file into 4 pieces. Do you have an account (Dropbox, Google Drive, etc.) I can send them to? Or a system I could ftp the zip file?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then just the apk should do. I only need the resources anyway.

elmkzgirxp said:
On that note, can I request the SystemUIGoogle in /system/priv-app too? It seems that the quick settings icons' edges are rounded compared to AOSP's sharp edges.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I misread your message (must be more tired than I realized). You didn't ask for the entire /system/priv-app!!

stevemw said:
I misread your message (must be more tired than I realized). You didn't ask for the entire /system/priv-app!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha that's insane. If I asked for the priv-app folder then I should've just asked for a complete system dump instead lol.

Here it is (I hope -- it didn't attach to the last response).

stevemw said:
Here it is (I hope -- it didn't attach to the last response).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! I also wanted to ask you something. I don't need the apk for it, but can you see any folder named SoundPicker in app or priv-app? If not, how about Sounds?

stevemw said:
Here it is (I hope -- it didn't attach to the last response).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The zip file seems to be corrupted.