any one working on fp gestures!? - Lenovo P2 Questions & Answers

Hi guys,
I and some of the other P2 users have been patiently waiting for fp gestures implemented on custom roms. I know this is not at all a simple task and will take time bcoz the implementation Lenovo had used for this feature is not 100% clear.
But still wanted to know if any developer is looking into this and trying to implement the feature for custom roms.
I am using the stock nouget ROM as my daily driver only because of this single reason. Would be great if some one could let us know the progress of any is going on.
If in case any testing is needed in case of a breakthrough, I'm ready to test the feature.

I am working on it. Currently I am preparing the Device tree. Need to extract vendor blobs as well. I just got boot loader unlocked today as I purchased this mobile 3 weeks back. I just had a look at key layouts in stock rom. Lenovo used some key layouts as I expected. But they lacked in kernel source. Need to implement on our own. I will try to implement and check whether it will work or not.

GSandeep said:
I am working on it. Currently I am preparing the Device tree. Need to extract vendor blobs as well. I just got boot loader unlocked today as I purchased this mobile 3 weeks back. I just had a look at key layouts in stock rom. Lenovo used some key layouts as I expected. But they lacked in kernel source. Need to implement on our own. I will try to implement and check whether it will work or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much for letting us know about this. Really appreciate your efforts. Best of luck. Do let us know about the progress once in a while just so that every one waiting knows work is in progress. Again thank you very much GSandeep.

GSandeep said:
I am working on it. Currently I am preparing the Device tree. Need to extract vendor blobs as well. I just got boot loader unlocked today as I purchased this mobile 3 weeks back. I just had a look at key layouts in stock rom. Lenovo used some key layouts as I expected. But they lacked in kernel source. Need to implement on our own. I will try to implement and check whether it will work or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi buddy,
Found a few entries in system navigation.apk which may help. Attaching ss.

Related

[Kernel] SEtweak

SEtweak kernel for Xperia S.
Intro:
I know I failed last time (with Play - it was stolen) and left development. But let's be serious this time.
Since it'll take a bit to set up everything again, I've taken DooM's ramdisk (hope you don't mind) for the first test.
Note: I don't have the device so I can't test it. If you want to, you can donate via Donate button on the left.
Sony finally published everything we need to build kernel.
Due to some possible bootloader problems, kernel might not work.
Features:
Codepage 852 (purely selfish reasons )
NLS UTF-8 (Native Language Support)
NTFS support
TUN/CIFS support
Default governor set to 'ondemand'
Prerooted
init.d support
Coming soon:
More governors
Recovery
Download: be patient
Best regards,
Blagus
Cool.
Ive unlocked my bootloader already so ill test it for you.
Im not rooted yet tho. I did have the rooted rom installed form another thread but i was having issues with app crashes so i flashed the stock .67
Hi there,
I hope the kernel wil be pre rooted and have some nice features....
I will try it
I need someone to send me kernel.sin of 6.0.A.3.62 firmware.
Hi there,
You can download it here : https://github.com/DooMLoRD/Xperia-2012-Official-Kernel-Sources and if its not there you can find it here http://eddy.uni-duisburg.de/bin4ry/L...1257-3921).ftf
Blagus said:
I need someone to send me kernel.sin of 6.0.A.3.62 firmware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im uploading it now for you
Edit:
Done
https://rapidshare.com/files/1187401250/kernel.sin
Don't bother Blagus. At this point, you can't really use a custom boot image due to a bootloader bug.
deovferreira said:
Don't bother Blagus. At this point, you can't really use a custom boot image due to a bootloader bug.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? Any more info on that?
It seems to affect some units at this point, I know of others which can boot just fine though using the instructions provided by Sony. This is the one thing preventing CM9 porting at this point.
deovferreira said:
It seems to affect some units at this point, I know of others which can boot just fine though using the instructions provided by Sony. This is the one thing preventing CM9 porting at this point.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi defer,
what is the bug exactly?
i faced some issues yesterday when testing out kernels on a users device...
whenever we tried hotbooting the kernel (fastboot boot kernel.elf) the bootloader always returned "Wrong range" even though i used exactly the same ranges as given by Sony....
the test kernels are posted here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=23868276#post23868276
if anyone wants to try them
I don't know the specifics of the bug, but it's in the bootloader it might be anything really, no way to know. However, what happens is that the bootloader is able to boot signed kernel.sin files but not the unsigned kernel.elf

[WIP][ROM][Verizon] CM10.1 for LG G2 (Verizon) looking for help!!

Howdy folks
I'd like to thank:
Dan Rosenberg (djrbliss) for Loki (the exploit that allows for custom boot images)
Dees_Troy (for TWRP)
Everybody who has contributed to the CyanogenMod Project
xiaolu for github tools used for unpacking and repacking boot images
I picked up my brand new LG G2 on Friday and I've been hard at work to get CM10.1 booting on it ever since yesterday; but a few hours ago I got my first boot -> http://imgur.com/a/1sZz2
I'm using a few proprietary files that I'd like to not use in the future (more than just the Adreno blobs)
But I'm looking to get a team together to get this working 100%
I will post device and vendor source as soon as I get back from cleaning gutters at my dad's house
What works:
Literally nothing, Android won't boot unless you have the necessary EGL libraries, so I just threw those in because I knew it would boot, and nothing else just to get a bare-bones (but booting) ROM. You can navigate throughout UI fine though (it's very smooth believe it or not).
I'll also upload a proof-of-concept build for those willing to see what CM10.1 will look like on our G2s. I'm currently unable to flash a zip in TWRP recovery, so I have to boot into recovery, wipe data, boot into fastboot, flash a system.img and a boot.img and reboot
If I were any person who likes to ROM but will like to remain stock until there's a stable ROM, I'd add a random "#" to any empty line in the file /system/build.prop which will throw off the sha1sum checker when the recovery goes to install an OTA update (this will block all OTAs from ever installing, thus keeping the current boot image exploit viable and it won't be patched up as the OTA won't be able to install. (root is required)
Edit: kernel, device and vendor sources are up!
https://github.com/JackpotClavin/android_device_lge_g2
https://github.com/JackpotClavin/android_kernel_lge_g2
https://github.com/JackpotClavin/android_vendor_lge_g2
10/17/13:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=46554268&postcount=271
10/12/13: alpha
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=46407049&postcount=138
10/3/13: Super alpha
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=46147336&postcount=74
I would love to help, but I admit I don't know much about Android development. I've got an AT&T G2 and I know C# and a bit of C++, so I'm sure I can figure out C. I think it's awesome that you're working on CM, if I can help out somehow I'd love to!
Not trying to be a **** because I can't wait for CM on this device, but why 10.1? Why not just go ahead to CM 10.2 and Android 4.3?
bose301s said:
Not trying to be a **** because I can't wait for CM on this device, but why 10.1? Why not just go ahead to CM 10.2 and Android 4.3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because our kernel, etc., are all set up for Android 4.2.2. Meaning, it is easier to get 4.2.2 running, and then move forward to get 10.2.
JackpotClavin: We already have a "few" devs prepping a device tree, though it still misses the proprietary blob references. You should take a look at them, all the device trees are on Github, under TeamLGOG.
fonix232 said:
Because our kernel, etc., are all set up for Android 4.2.2. Meaning, it is easier to get 4.2.2 running, and then move forward to get 10.2.
JackpotClavin: We already have a "few" devs prepping a device tree, though it still misses the proprietary blob references. You should take a look at them, all the device trees are on Github, under TeamLGOG.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, that is what I was thinking but I have never done any dev work or anything so I figured I would ask.
I cant help but I sure want to thank you folks for trying to get this up and running. This phone is an absolute BEAST! Coming from the gnex I'm excited about the G2's potential.
Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk 4
Thanks!
I just wanted to thank you very very much for working on this! I knew this was going to be a well developed phone and I bet before 4 months we will have a good amount of choice as far as roms go. Thanks again!
I've been trying to port beanstalk to the G2 but I need the same information you are trying for. I need device trees to sync with. I can PM you with what info I've came up with So far if you are interested.?
Edit: tress are up! Great work
Sent from my LG-D800 using xda app-developers app
If you lived in my town I'd probably help by cleaning the gutters for you hehe. Thanks for your work!
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
I am definitely willing to help in any way I can.
I am willing to beta test and report bugs, dont know much about development but I want CM i have been using it forever...
grandmasterlarry said:
I am willing to beta test and report bugs, dont know much about development but I want CM i have been using it forever...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same goes for me, I have the Korean version.
Does CyanogenMod get rid of features like KnockON? I have grown accustomed to it and don't know if I could do without it (my device sits in a vehicle dock a lot of the time where the buttons on the back are 100% inaccessible unless I disconnect the charger, remove phone from dock/holder and find the buttons on the back.)
Is KnockON a Snapdragon 800 feature, or an LG UI feature (I think so, as it doesn't seem to work except in the notif bar, the stock browser, and the stock lock screen)? Can it be added to the AOSP/CM code perhaps?
mrbig012 said:
Does CyanogenMod get rid of features like KnockON? I have grown accustomed to it and don't know if I could do without it (my device sits in a vehicle dock a lot of the time where the buttons on the back are 100% inaccessible unless I disconnect the charger, remove phone from dock/holder and find the buttons on the back.)
Is KnockON a Snapdragon 800 feature, or an LG UI feature (I think so, as it doesn't seem to work except in the notif bar, the stock browser, and the stock lock screen)? Can it be added to the AOSP/CM code perhaps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LG UI feature. I'm fairly sure it will be ported to an AOSP/CM10/LGUI hybrid ROM at some point. I believe part of the issue that devs are running into is that a lot of the custom LG software appears to be tied together.
Can you guys keep us updated on your progress, this is a make or break thing for me with this phone, CM is just so much better than any stock ROM that I don't know if I can deal with a phone that has no prospect of official support.
JackpotClavin said:
Howdy folks
I'd like to thank:
Dan Rosenberg (djrbliss) for Loki (the exploit that allows for custom boot images)
Dees_Troy (for TWRP)
Everybody who has contributed to the CyanogenMod Project
xiaolu for github tools used for unpacking and repacking boot images
I picked up my brand new LG G2 on Friday and I've been hard at work to get CM10.1 booting on it ever since yesterday; but a few hours ago I got my first boot -> http://imgur.com/a/1sZz2
I'm using a few proprietary files that I'd like to not use in the future (more than just the Adreno blobs)
But I'm looking to get a team together to get this working 100%
I will post device and vendor source as soon as I get back from cleaning gutters at my dad's house
What works:
Literally nothing, Android won't boot unless you have the necessary EGL libraries, so I just threw those in because I knew it would boot, and nothing else just to get a bare-bones (but booting) ROM. You can navigate throughout UI fine though (it's very smooth believe it or not).
I'll also upload a proof-of-concept build for those willing to see what CM10.1 will look like on our G2s. I'm currently unable to flash a zip in TWRP recovery, so I have to boot into recovery, wipe data, boot into fastboot, flash a system.img and a boot.img and reboot
If I were any person who likes to ROM but will like to remain stock until there's a stable ROM, I'd add a random "#" to any empty line in the file /system/build.prop which will throw off the sha1sum checker when the recovery goes to install an OTA update (this will block all OTAs from ever installing, thus keeping the current boot image exploit viable and it won't be patched up as the OTA won't be able to install. (root is required)
Edit: device and vendor sources are up!
https://github.com/JackpotClavin/android_device_lge_g2
https://github.com/JackpotClavin/android_vendor_lge_g2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are we going to try getting mobile network and wifi working first? Is adb working?
droid_<3er said:
Are we going to try getting mobile network and wifi working first? Is adb working?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First is audio. It's proving to be a big problem. I can't get anything working using either prebuilt binaries from stock, or building from source
JackpotClavin said:
First is audio. It's proving to be a big problem. I can't get anything working using either prebuilt binaries from stock, or building from source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am NOT a developer, but this could help perhaps?
http://opensource.wolfsonmicro.com/content/wm5110-linux-driver-released
Not sure if it really is open source or only available as binaries, but the WM5110 is the audio SoC in this phone... I am probably not helping.
Additionally, I think the S4 uses this SoC as well. It's a pretty new part but is gaining a lot of momentum.
Edit: My god that WM5110 is a hell of a part... quad-core, 600 MIPS... dayum!
Glad to hear an update, even if it's about issues. Seeing that there are people actively working on this to make it happen makes me much happier and less worried about keeping this phone vs. returning it tomorrow or Friday to see how the Nexus 5 plays out etc.
Have any of you tried talking to Ricardo Cerqueira? He is in fact the primary maintainer for all LG Devices with regards to Cyanogenmod. I am sure he is planning on supporting this device in the near future, I just don't know when. It will probably be when the device is more readily available since it was pretty much just released.

Cm-13.0 - development/discussion thread

Hi,
So, cm-13 is very unlikely on our device, but i'll take a look anyway (a slow look as my time is very limited).
Here you'll find my "work" and "help requests".
First, for sure i didn't "worked" on a lot of device, but it's the first one i have with a dedicated partition to the kernel dts.
Code:
/dev/block/platform/hi_mci.0/by-name/dts /dts emmc defaults recoveryonly
+/dev/block/platform/hi_mci.0/by-name/boot /boot emmc defaults recoveryonly
+/dev/block/platform/hi_mci.0/by-name/recovery /recovery emmc defaults recoveryonly
+/dev/block/platform/hi_mci.0/by-name/misc /misc emmc defaults recoveryonly
+/dev/block/platform/hi_mci.0/by-name/modem /modem emmc defaults recoveryonly
+/dev/block/platform/hi_mci.0/by-name/modem_dsp /modem_dsp emmc defaults recoveryonly
+/dev/block/platform/hi_mci.0/by-name/sensorhub /sensorhub emmc defaults recoveryonly
- I wonder if the dts, which is kernel dependent, could be the major problem to get a custom rom version (kk, jb, mm), or even a stock huawei rom, to work from any base rom. I'll try to make some experiment soon.
- I did sync cm-13, and "of course" have cwm recovery working. But whatever i'm trying i can't get screen output on twrp 3.0. Does someone have a clue on this?
- @gabry3795 , do you still have the device ? I would be happy to get your hangout/google nickname if you have any to sometime talk about this device. @codeworkx is of course also welcome for any advice. By the way your cm12.0 github repo (codeworkx) doesn't seem's to be up to date, even if i understand that's it's in a non-working state.
Cpasjuste said:
@codeworkx is of course also welcome for any advice. By the way your cm12.0 github repo (codeworkx) doesn't seem's to be up to date, even if i understand that's it's in a non-working state.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're looking at the wrong account.
https://github.com/honor6-dev
Start recovery and have a look at /tmp/recovery.log.
Hint:
https://github.com/honor6-dev/andro...common/blob/cm-12.1/BoardConfigCommon.mk#L150
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/andr...mmit/7273770a9fedff12ca80135356c52fee06c8aba0
Cpasjuste said:
- @gabry3795 , do you still have the device ? I would be happy to get your hangout/google nickname if you have any to sometime talk about this device. @codeworkx is of course also welcome for any advice. By the way your cm12.0 github repo (codeworkx) doesn't seem's to be up to date, even if i understand that's it's in a non-working state.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I still have this device! I'll write you via pm my nickname.
good luck you guys
i have really nothing to offer ..
but please make this happen ..
Unfortunately I really have no time to play with it this days, I'll try to take a look soon.
Envoyé de mon HUAWEI MT7-L09 en utilisant Tapatalk
Cpasjuste said:
Unfortunately I really have no time to play with it this days, I'll try to take a look soon.
Envoyé de mon HUAWEI MT7-L09 en utilisant Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pls we wait for a long time:good:
It would be great to se cm no this device. Good luck and hope you make it. I would help if knew anything about programming but unfortanatly i dont
Cm we want... thank you for your interest!! ?
Kzyw said:
Cm we want... thank you for your interest!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
why is there not one custom rom for this device?
Motawa88 said:
why is there not one custom rom for this device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because huawei refuses to share their kernel source. suffice it to say, im done with huawei. its a good thing that there are many new phones being released soon. from now on its snapdragon or nothing!
Motawa88 said:
why is there not one custom rom for this device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I understand there are some crucial files / source codes that Huawei is refusing to release to the public. This alone sounds super dodgy, because isn't Android supposed to be open source? Or can companies "own" a custom version of Android and do this sort of thing?
These files are crucial for creating custom kernels and ROMs, as they have to do with (once again, this is how I interpreted it) how the device handles the CPU and GPU.
Basically, while it is possible to install other ROMs on the device, they'll have to be based on EMUI and its kernels, because it is the only thing that contains these files necessary to make the device run, which makes the entire exercise pointless because EMUI is s*** no matter what form it takes.
I wonder if it wouldn't be possible to simply "extract" this necessary code from the stock kernels / ROMs and implement it in a custom one? I do not know even the slightest thing about programming, so I could just be sounding like an idiot.
Scruffykid said:
I wonder if it wouldn't be possible to simply "extract" this necessary code from the stock kernels / ROMs and implement it in a custom one? I do not know even the slightest thing about programming, so I could just be sounding like an idiot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i too have wondered about this. im sure its possible but it might be far to difficult an endeavor because if it weren't, someone would have attempted it by now. i really miss my nexus 5 with all its custom roms. i suggest that all mate 7 owners get in contact with huawei and demand they comply with the android user agreement. they are technically supposed to give up sources. we could fight, but not unless we unite.
Yes we can! Yes we can! Yes we can!
Scruffykid said:
As I understand there are some crucial files / source codes that Huawei is refusing to release to the public. This alone sounds super dodgy, because isn't Android supposed to be open source? Or can companies "own" a custom version of Android and do this sort of thing?
These files are crucial for creating custom kernels and ROMs, as they have to do with (once again, this is how I interpreted it) how the device handles the CPU and GPU.
Basically, while it is possible to install other ROMs on the device, they'll have to be based on EMUI and its kernels, because it is the only thing that contains these files necessary to make the device run, which makes the entire exercise pointless because EMUI is s*** no matter what form it takes.
I wonder if it wouldn't be possible to simply "extract" this necessary code from the stock kernels / ROMs and implement it in a custom one? I do not know even the slightest thing about programming, so I could just be sounding like an idiot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right, extracting stock binary files is an essential part of roms porting but some important files can't be inherited because they are strictly hardware-related, therefore you have to compile the original android source and then "patch" that files for the specific GPU/CPU (starting from android 5 lollipop) with other files given by the vendor of the phone.
gabry3795 said:
...then "patch" that files for the specific GPU/CPU (starting from android 5 lollipop) with other files given by the vendor of the phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But isn't that the entire problem, the "other files" that have to be supplied by the vendor? Huawei is refusing to release them, and therefore making it impossible to develop custom ROM's.
Or are you saying that it is possible, but there just isn't enough interest in the phone for anyone with the necessary skills to actually go through the trouble?
Scruffykid said:
But isn't that the entire problem, the "other files" that have to be supplied by the vendor? Huawei is refusing to release them, and therefore making it impossible to develop custom ROM's.
Or are you saying that it is possible, but there just isn't enough interest in the phone for anyone with the necessary skills to actually go through the trouble?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm saying that Huawei must provide that 'patches' (as Qualcomm did, for example) otherwise is impossibile to build a working ROM, this is the problem. We cannot do anything without them.
gabry3795 said:
I'm saying that Huawei must provide that 'patches' (as Qualcomm did, for example) otherwise is impossibile to build a working ROM, this is the problem. We cannot do anything without them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is why we should all come together so as to put pressure on huawei to release these files. i have been trying for months now but its getting very tiresome. im going to start a twitter account that will hopefully get their attention. i think the problem is that the general public dont know much/anything about custom roms. there should be a custom rom psa for all android users that point out the benefits of custom roms.
droidbot1337 said:
this is why we should all come together so as to put pressure on huawei to release these files. i have been trying for months now but its getting very tiresome. im going to start a twitter account that will hopefully get their attention. i think the problem is that the general public dont know much/anything about custom roms. there should be a custom rom psa for all android users that point out the benefits of custom roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. If you get that account running let us know here so that we can support it.
Cheers! :good:
---------- Post added at 12:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:32 AM ----------
droidbot1337 said:
because huawei refuses to share their kernel source. suffice it to say, im done with huawei. its a good thing that there are many new phones being released soon. from now on its snapdragon or nothing!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed.
Unfortunately I live in a place where just picking up a new phone is not as easy as 123, But I think I'll try and get my hands on a different phone this weekend. Huawei pisses me off.
No source release by Huawei.
No Kirin SOC support would be a huge problem to get it working I think.

[AOSP Tamien 8.1 with OpenGapps]

I was able to use https://github.com/anestisb/android-prepare-vendor to prepare the vendor images to correctly build AOSP.
I submitted some changes to make it work with Pixel2-XL and they have been merged into main branch.
You have to wipe everything.
I dont know how to make proper zip images for TWRP so use fastboot
I use the fastboot script included in the zip after a full wipe and im all good
Thanks:
anestisb on Github
opengapps
not working:
pixel squeeze
AOSP 8.1 with google apps:
V3:
https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=889964283620776051
AOSP 8.1 stock (no gapps):
https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=817906626617955840
changelog:
v3:
Jan security update
v2:
updated camera
pixel launcher
updated wallpaper that was causing errors
fixed google setup errors during startup and boot
archive:
v2: https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=817906626617955877
V1:
https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=745849072291697825
During first boot google setup crashes a bit and I just skip it ...then on reboot I get complaints about stuff. but everything works. so......
deeproot said:
I built AOSP with OpenGapps and all I got was this forum thread
You have to wipe everything.
I dont know how to make proper images so use fastboot
I use the fastboot script included after a full wipe and im all good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Link?
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
yea, link?
?????
Don't tease us like this, lol. I'll flash anything at this point!
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
uplodz complete.
Interesting :good:
I've been doing my best to get my own build running for a few weeks now, and while everything else seems to work perfectly, I can't seem to figure out a way to get it to connect to mobile data. I'd be really interested to hear if there's something in addition to the build instructions provided by Google that you had to do to get it working!
I would just use your build, but my goal is to avoid gapps altogether. Hopefully the trick isn't to have gapps installed
Thanks!
prurigro said:
I've been doing my best to get my own build running for a few weeks now, and while everything else seems to work perfectly, I can't seem to figure out a way to get it to connect to mobile data. I'd be really interested to hear if there's something in addition to the build instructions provided by Google that you had to do to get it working!
I would just use your build, but my goal is to avoid gapps altogether. Hopefully the trick isn't to have gapps installed
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought the whole point of gapps is Google *****es if you build a Rom with google apps installed already...
prurigro said:
I've been doing my best to get my own build running for a few weeks now, and while everything else seems to work perfectly, I can't seem to figure out a way to get it to connect to mobile data. I'd be really interested to hear if there's something in addition to the build instructions provided by Google that you had to do to get it working!
I would just use your build, but my goal is to avoid gapps altogether. Hopefully the trick isn't to have gapps installed
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u did add in the propietary drivers i assume before u started making ur build?
this build is running smooth! i almost wanna say u couldve left gapps out n let ppl choose which they want to use but of cpurse this is only the beginning.. first thing i did was remove all those google hotword apks that fc, not had any issues yet and u already stated squeeze isnt on here but i nvr used that anyways
I was building from source today but my env has a ways to go before its useable.. it literally took all day to make aosp arm64 eng lol.. started gettin low mem stops towards the end so gonna look at it tom... i actually need to change it up and tweak settings cuz i only got 6gb ram
my set up tho is ur aosp, flash kernel 2.05 and magisk 15.1.. butter.. or shall i say vanilla??
prurigro said:
I've been doing my best to get my own build running for a few weeks now, and while everything else seems to work perfectly, I can't seem to figure out a way to get it to connect to mobile data. I'd be really interested to hear if there's something in addition to the build instructions provided by Google that you had to do to get it working!
I would just use your build, but my goal is to avoid gapps altogether. Hopefully the trick isn't to have gapps installed
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
aosp i dont think includes automatocally.. its runnin android web view n all lol instead of chrome that is
Now, I'm relatively new to the rooting world of Android. Is AOSP essentially custom ROMs? I know this is sort of a "if you don't know, you likely shouldn't be messing with it." I just love tweaking my phone!
So far only the squeeze doesn't work? Should the less advance user hold off until it's been tested a bit? Regardless, thanks for distributing your work to everyone on here! I love this community. Being able to share in the glory that is altering literally almost every aspect of your phone's software.
jgreen077 said:
Now, I'm relatively new to the rooting world of Android. Is AOSP essentially custom ROMs? I know this is sort of a "if you don't know, you likely shouldn't be messing with it." I just love tweaking my phone!
So far only the squeeze doesn't work? Should the less advance user hold off until it's been tested a bit? Regardless, thanks for distributing your work to everyone on here! I love this community. Being able to share in the glory that is altering literally almost every aspect of your phone's software.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for u id say hold off.. it works fine for me but it technically is a userdebug build.. AOSP =Android Open Source Project, Its basically Android built from Android source so typically devs can pull the source and make their own roms how they want them. Normally doesnt even have google apps like play store for example.
Its a very clean low lvl android OS and the dev controls every aspect of the build process.. its also been called Vanilla
this technically is "custom" but this initial build doesnt have many tweaks or customizations.. its merely a glimpse as to the possibilities
but hey, try it out if u got the itch, it wont hurt u lol plus the only real way to know the difference is to try it for yourself
jgreen077 said:
Now, I'm relatively new to the rooting world of Android. Is AOSP essentially custom ROMs? I know this is sort of a "if you don't know, you likely shouldn't be messing with it." I just love tweaking my phone!
So far only the squeeze doesn't work? Should the less advance user hold off until it's been tested a bit? Regardless, thanks for distributing your work to everyone on here! I love this community. Being able to share in the glory that is altering literally almost every aspect of your phone's software.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for u id say hold off.. it works fine for me but it technically is a userdebug build.. AOSP =Android Open Source Project, Its basically Android built from Android source so typically devs can pull the source and make their own roms how they want them. Normally doesnt even have google apps like play store for example.
Its a very clean low lvl android OS and the dev controls every aspect of the build process.. its also been called Vanilla
this technically is "custom" but this initial build doesnt have many tweaks or customizations.. its merely a glimpse as to the possibilities
but hey, try it out if u got the itch, it wont hurt u lol plus the only real way to know the difference is to try it for yourself
elliwigy said:
for u id say hold off.. it works fine for me but it technically is a userdebug build.. AOSP =Android Open Source Project, Its basically Android built from Android source so typically devs can pull the source and make their own roms how they want them. Normally doesnt even have google apps like play store for example.
Its a very clean low lvl android OS and the dev controls every aspect of the build process.. its also been called Vanilla
this technically is "custom" but this initial build doesnt have many tweaks or customizations.. its merely a glimpse as to the possibilities
but hey, try it out if u got the itch, it wont hurt u lol plus the only real way to know the difference is to try it for yourself
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly, I'd normally listen and hold off. But since I have a day off I think I'm gonna attempt it just for the sake of learning!
As long as it has the Play Store so I can download the apps I want, I'm good. If I can get all the apps I need to than I'll be a happy camper.
Say later on it's decided I want to go to another AOSP rom, am I going to have to wipe again? If I can get all my apps, won't have to wipe my device every other week, and can get my modules installed I should be good to do some good old fashioned experimentation.
I am not a smart man, at times. I'm gonna try it out. I have a few hours before anyone else is awake. Might as well use that time (un)wisely.
Plus I believe these "vanilla" ROMs, being what they are, can be modded to an even greater extent than the already pretty modifiable "stock" Pixel ones. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
prurigro said:
I've been doing my best to get my own build running for a few weeks now, and while everything else seems to work perfectly, I can't seem to figure out a way to get it to connect to mobile data. I'd be really interested to hear if there's something in addition to the build instructions provided by Google that you had to do to get it working!
I would just use your build, but my goal is to avoid gapps altogether. Hopefully the trick isn't to have gapps installed
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I found this:
https://github.com/anestisb/android-prepare-vendor
I submitted my changes and they will update in a few days to the add tamien support.
I am going to hold off on this for now, as it's just a shell of what custom Android can be but just wanted to say thank you very much for getting the ball rolling. For giving us hope haha. I check the thread at least 4 times a day and my heart jumped when I saw this post! Good work!
Nice can we flash the Kernels that have been around here for a while on this rom?
patt2k said:
Nice can we flash the Kernels that have been around here for a while on this rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I flashed Elemental X and finger print stopped working.
deeproot said:
I found this:
https://github.com/anestisb/android-prepare-vendor
I submitted my changes and they will update in a few days to the add tamien support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@deeproot
have you uploaded your WIP android_prepare_vendor anywhere? I would like to clone your changed repo and run this script if possible.
I attempted to manually add your changes in the pull request, but the script is breaking with a debugfs error
Thanks,
Edit: Found it, still getting same debugfs error.
Code:
[*] Extracting '/tmp/android_prepare_vendor.jlQiR6/taimen/opm1.171019.011/taimen-opm1.171019.011-factory-2df1c1cb.zip'
[*] Unzipping 'image-taimen-opm1.171019.011.zip'
[-] Symlinks have not been properly processed from /tmp/android_img_extract.FRWAOM/taimen-opm1.171019.011-factory-2df1c1cb/images/vendor.img.raw
[!] If you don't have a compatible debugfs version, modify 'execute-all.sh' to disable 'USE_DEBUGFS' flag
[-] Factory images data extract failed
[email protected] ~/Desktop/android-prepare-vendor $

Question Is someone looking forward to custom ROM this phone?

I don't own this device, but I wanna port TWRP to it. I just wanted to know if anyone wants to custom ROM it/root because it would be a waste of time porting it if no one will use the custom recovery.
Also, I will need the device tree so it will take a few more days, as this phone is new and theres no sources available
ActuallyJammy said:
I don't own this device, but I wanna port TWRP to it. I just wanted to know if anyone wants to custom ROM it/root because it would be a waste of time porting it if no one will use the custom recovery.
Also, I will need the device tree so it will take a few more days, as this phone is new and theres no sources available
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello, be sure that I'm looking forward to have custom ROM on this phone. Till now I'm using my old phone with Alphadroid and my new A54 is still in the box.
I dont.....I love OneUI 5.1, so asbolutely no need.
Got the device tree. On my way to build TWRP
I wanted to buy this phone and i came here to check if a twrp was available. I wouldn't even know what to do with a phone without a custom recovery. Please someone make a custom rom too. Kudos!
YES Please!
You weirdos... searching for twrp and custom roms before buying a phone!
That's why I came here, too )
ActuallyJammy said:
Got the device tree. On my way to build TWRP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just bought this phone a week ago and I'm eager to flash TWRP or any other reputable custom recovery on this device for that matter. Hoping that it's still in the cards...
yessssss please, just ordered this phone and it pains me to see this forum empty from custom roms, and especially TWRP, how can a phone exists without one
Yes please! There's a thread on Samsung's EU community that has problems with GPS and Battery, I am on the latter one, the phone has awesome battery lige for like 4 days and then 20-30% battery drain overnight with no screen time and no user app usage, the first big (May) Update did not address it, there's no official comment about it, no fix, the usual factory reset it response from mods, just overall terrible... And there's no Custom ROMs available... So yes, please, can't wait to get rid of OneUI and all the unnecessary/spyware/bloatware of Samsung.

Categories

Resources