Related
What ROM from Original Android Development do you reccomend ? How about CM 10.1.5\CM 10.2 ? Are them good for everyday using ?
dragon_chris97 said:
What ROM from Original Android Development do you reccomend ? How about CM 10.1.5\CM 10.2 ? Are them good for everyday using ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cm9 from mmb, with link2sd and odexed
using right now without any problem. smooth, battery friendly
CM 10
dragon_chris97 said:
What ROM from Original Android Development do you reccomend ? How about CM 10.1.5\CM 10.2 ? Are them good for everyday using ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi dragon_chris97,
I'm currently using CM 10.1.5 nightly-20131005 by Mardon for my daily use.
It's good since you do not install many apps there to keep the RAM and free space enough for the system.
I don't link frequent use apps to SD-Card since it will impact the performance, but for some not important apps, I link them including dex file.
Hi guys
I have this galaxy w which I had the stock rom with gingerbread.
I was searching for a custom rom for the phone and saw that there were cm9 cm10 and cm11.
I installed the new cm11 by arco68 but I'm having problems with the battery with greenify already installed.
During the night when I was asleep in 3 hours used 10% of my battery.
I'm new in roms and android development, so can anyone help me and tell me the differences between each cm version?
Any version is more lighter with the battery?
What can I do improve the battery use?
Thanks in advance
Try CM9
Sent from my GT-I9082 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
kap19 said:
Hi guys
I have this galaxy w which I had the stock rom with gingerbread.
I was searching for a custom rom for the phone and saw that there were cm9 cm10 and cm11.
I installed the new cm11 by arco68 but I'm having problems with the battery with greenify already installed.
During the night when I was asleep in 3 hours used 10% of my battery.
I'm new in roms and android development, so can anyone help me and tell me the differences between each cm version?
Any version is more lighter with the battery?
What can I do improve the battery use?
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can try [ROM][ICS][4.0.4][IMM76L] CyanogenMod 9 Final Release (EOL) by Arco68
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1576874
cm9 has the best battery life
dont expect long battery lifes from custom roms as stock rom.
but if u wanna use a custom rom choese the one that suits you.
kap19 said:
Hi guys
I have this galaxy w which I had the stock rom with gingerbread.
I was searching for a custom rom for the phone and saw that there were cm9 cm10 and cm11.
I installed the new cm11 by arco68 but I'm having problems with the battery with greenify already installed.
During the night when I was asleep in 3 hours used 10% of my battery.
I'm new in roms and android development, so can anyone help me and tell me the differences between each cm version?
Any version is more lighter with the battery?
What can I do improve the battery use?
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently Google claimed that 4.4 KitKat is designed for low-end phones. So use CM11
Smack that Thanks button if I helped!
XDAing from a N7105 powered by Illusion ROM.
Sent from a small country called Singapore.
P.S. Time for school, not much time for XDA
for me its cm9 or cm11
For me now the best battery saving ROM + kernel is CM 9 and hurtsky's kernel, it is just awesome, if you need battery then this is the right combination for you
CyanogenMod 9 + Hurtsky's Kernel.
and update Playstore Service 4.1.32
iwjosi said:
cm9 has the best battery life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can someone tell me which one of the CM9 Asradu posted kernels is the best for battery life? Thanks in advance!
Just wondering, since Kitkat is optimise for low RAM, does cm9 consume large amount of ram?
Irwenzhao said:
Apparently Google claimed that 4.4 KitKat is designed for low-end phones. So use CM11
P.S. Time for school, not much time for XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me DarkCM11 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2618851 works pretty good. I use KhaN Kernel v1.5 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2593327 and its runs pretty fluently + battery life is good
Irwenzhao said:
Apparently Google claimed that 4.4 KitKat is designed for low-end phones. So use CM11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im confused, I still see many reports indicating high battery drain on CM11.
btw, currently using "CM09 (EOL final) + Hurtsky's Kernel REV10" but want to know if I would have better options for extended battery performance.
thanks in advance, regards
Problem with installing khan kernel
LS.xD said:
For me DarkCM11 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2618851 works pretty good. I use KhaN Kernel v1.5 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2593327 and its runs pretty fluently + battery life is good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I am new to installing ROM, I have study about 3 days and decided to apply darkCM11 with khan kernel, as you mentioned,
I installed CM11 and it worked, but The device was warm and battery drained fast, I installed it again with following tuterials and format sdcard0 this time, it get better but the main problem is to install/flash another kernel or update like khan kernel or philz touch, they are failed with status 7 ,
I tried to removed assert line from updater_script but it didn't work, It seems the os is now heavier than these works and I am confused right now,
please help me :
1- what to do first, should I install CM11 from scratch ?
2- for istalling khan kernel should I install Philz touch? and if so, what I should to do with the status 7 problem
I have installed CMR 6.0.4.5 and it works,
Sirvanparaste said:
Hi, I am new to installing ROM, I have study about 3 days and decided to apply darkCM11 with khan kernel, as you mentioned,
I installed CM11 and it worked, but The device was warm and battery drained fast, I installed it again with following tuterials and format sdcard0 this time, it get better but the main problem is to install/flash another kernel or update like khan kernel or philz touch, they are failed with status 7 ,
I tried to removed assert line from updater_script but it didn't work, It seems the os is now heavier than these works and I am confused right now,
please help me :
1- what to do first, should I install CM11 from scratch ?
2- for istalling khan kernel should I install Philz touch? and if so, what I should to do with the status 7 problem
I have installed CMR 6.0.4.5 and it works,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still got issues?
I can send you instructions via pm. Just tell me if you need...
Anypne can suggest me good ROM and kernel for battery life?
I dont need features, just battery life..
Thanks before
Stock.
http://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Stock.
http://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really?
I planned to flash slimkat ROM..
What do you think?
Kaka88 said:
Really?
I planned to flash slimkat ROM..
What do you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you want to flash any other custom ROM if you don't need any features, only a good battery?
I really don't understand this.
Kaka88 said:
I dont need features, just battery life..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Why you want to flash any other custom ROM if you don't need any features, only a good battery?
I really don't understand this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because i think some of custom ROM has bettwr battery life than stock
Kaka88 said:
Because i think some of custom ROM has bettwr battery life than stock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you debloated and make knox-free, stock rom will have good battery life, better camera, and samsung framework features (things you lost in custom rom)
if you want to try a custom rom, i recommend you try Mokee (stable) with last Fak Kernel, mokee has an amazing saving power feature and is the more stable rom (in my opinion), with fak kernel with right settings and undervolt (see in fak thread, or pm me) you will get the best battery life, my goals are the same as yours (battery life), and i already try almost every rom here (right now iam trying LiquidSmooth, but i did not like it...will try next the S5 proyect, and wait for official 4.4.4 to test, but until now, mokee is my prefered rom
Dont know if last fak kernel is working with mokee, when a try it some time ago it give me FC, but i think last version works, cause iam using it with liquismooth right now, but even with the stock mokee kernel, it has amazing battery life.
pedromms86 said:
if you debloated and make knox-free, stock rom will have good battery life, better camera, and samsung framework features (things you lost in custom rom)
if you want to try a custom rom, i recommend you try Mokee (stable) with last Fak Kernel, mokee has an amazing saving power feature and is the more stable rom (in my opinion), with fak kernel with right settings and undervolt (see in fak thread, or pm me) you will get the best battery life, my goals are the same as yours (battery life), and i already try almost every rom here (right now iam trying LiquidSmooth, but i did not like it...will try next the S5 proyect, and wait for official 4.4.4 to test, but until now, mokee is my prefered rom
Dont know if last fak kernel is working with mokee, when a try it some time ago it give me FC, but i think last version works, cause iam using it with liquismooth right now, but even with the stock mokee kernel, it has amazing battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wooow..
Thank you very much!
I will try mokee ROM and Fak Kernel..
Doea the ROM comes with its custom kernel?
I will root my device first before flashin custom ROM and Kernel..
LiquidSmooth ???
last v3.2 milestone , it's a full stable rom ...... and with a very good baterry life !
why you don't like it ?!
Loulou-13 said:
LiquidSmooth ???
last v3.2 milestone , it's a full stable rom ...... and with a very good baterry life !
why you don't like it ?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'am using last version, get some random reboots (i think its because of fak kernel and undervolt...) i miss some launcher options like mokee have (i know i can change launcher...) i found the rom a little confusing, the way the settings are in config options, and there are too much thinks i dont use and dont like like (side app bar, pie control...etc) .
The rom is good, its just my PERSONAL taste, i like it clean,iam a big fan of mokee, and stock rom, just go to a custom rom for 4.4.4 and better battery like i like i say, just waiting for official 4.4.4 - the quality of camera we loss in custom rom its a big point for me to go back when its released
I will stick with stock ROM first with custom kernel..
Do you mean f4ction kernel?
Because i cant fink fak kernel everywhere
Kaka88 said:
I will stick with stock ROM first with custom kernel..
Do you mean f4ction kernel?
Because i cant fink fak kernel everywhere
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What did I tell you in my first replies? :angel:
Here is F4k kernel for stock: [KERNEL]-[TW]-[ML1] f4ktion 1.3.0 [LTE] - [OC/UC/UV/OTG]
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Stock.
http://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Why you want to flash any other custom ROM if you don't need any features, only a good battery?
I really don't understand this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
What did I tell you in my first replies? :angel:
Here is F4k kernel for stock: [KERNEL]-[TW]-[ML1] f4ktion 1.3.0 [LTE] - [OC/UC/UV/OTG]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much then
Kaka88 said:
I will stick with stock ROM first with custom kernel..
Do you mean f4ction kernel?
Because i cant fink fak kernel everywhere
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He means f4ktion kernel yes
Sent from my unknown using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I'm using the Spirit Rom and battery life is without f4ction kernel very good it's better than with f4k kernel.
Flatric said:
I'm using the Spirit Rom and battery life is without f4ction kernel very good it's better than with f4k kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will see that ROM then
F4k kernel for aosp roms:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2568479
Rackell said:
F4k kernel for aosp roms:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2568479
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
But i accidentally brick my device and i have downloaded SLIM Rom, so i flashed it..
And i cant find AOSP ver in your link..
I want to use fak kernel with Slim Rom..
Stock ROM just too big to download
Kaka88 said:
Thanks!
But i accidentally brick my device and i have downloaded SLIM Rom, so i flashed it..
And i cant find AOSP ver in your link..
I want to use fak kernel with Slim Rom..
Stock ROM just too big to download
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to download f4k kernel for aosp Roms to use it with Slim Rom
Flatric said:
You have to download f4k kernel for aosp Roms to use it with Slim Rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
Sent from my GT-I9190 using Tapatalk 2
Update question
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Stock.
sammobile dot com/firmwares
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi guys, first of all let me apologize up front for posting this question without knowing whether it has been answered billion times before. It's my first Samsung phone after having Motorola for a long time and the transition to the new apps and vocabulary is not that straightforward.
I've got an I-9190 running 4.2.2 from a carrier and they still haven't upgraded to 4.4. But when I entered to the website above, there's a 4.4.2 firmware for my country and my device. The upgrade seems rather easy, but I'm not sure whether it will run or not. I would really like to upgrade to 4.4.2 and I'm quite confident I'd be able to do it using Odin, but my question is if that firmware could run on my device. Any tips are welcome.
Thanks!
Aicp vs crdroid ???
In my opinion CrDroid ROM. Both ROMs are good for daily drivers though.
HighwayStar's Los 14.1
Crdroid rom is best rom ......but November patch only last update........aicp rom have December patch little bit bug and freeze. Problem
:good:stock MM
Wouldn't trade the battery life and the simplicity of stock N for another rom.
Out of topic : Cosmic OS
Any ROM without Dark screen video recording ?
(Only stock) is there any other ROM without this bug?
Stock Android 7 is the best and without any bugs.
Best is los - HighwayStar. Beautifull is ViperOs (black theme)!
for me after stock rom Mokee is the best...but the developer droped this rom with no reason
eried1 said:
Wouldn't trade the battery life and the simplicity of stock N for another rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
alirazaagha said:
Stock Android 7 is the best and without any bugs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me Stock MM is good in both terms performance and battery
i feel the battery drains faster in Nougat
What's your experience?
YoYoRishi said:
For me Stock MM is good in both terms performance and battery
i feel the battery drains faster in Nougat
What's your experience?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock M was good in battery life and N is also good. I can't really comment on the battery life after the update because I've got 130+ apps which can affect the battery life in the background. But, the real thing is that Android 7 has got some really cool features like; reply from notification, double tap for switching apps, multi apps, improved third party app features and so on. Hence, decision of updating OS for me was easier because I always strive for better user experience and battery of P2 is just too good to be worried about battery life.
Coltos 1.4 is best naught rom for p2... currently using this and no intention of changing untill stable oreo..
YoYoRishi said:
For me Stock MM is good in both terms performance and battery
i feel the battery drains faster in Nougat
What's your experience?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see no difference at all. Initially it might have been a bit worse, but I'm now using S244 and it seems as good as ever.
I read some discouring posts of S251 (not battery related though) so I passed that upgrade.
Sohit5s said:
Aicp vs crdroid ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro stay stock rom
Shuvamilu said:
Bro stay stock rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
M on dotos. on stock i have that ****ty lag while playing videos on Facebook or Instagram...thats why i installed custom rom.
Sohit5s said:
M on dotos. on stock i have that ****ty lag while playing videos on Facebook or Instagram...thats why i installed custom rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro i know that some bug on stock rom but I tested all of custom ROM but stock way better than custom ROM .....my opinion
Shuvamilu said:
Bro i know that some bug on stock rom but I tested all of custom ROM but stock way better than custom ROM .....my opinion
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know bro ? stock rom is best for any device...i just easily get bored ? that's why..and i want customisation...
Sohit5s said:
I know bro ? stock rom is best for any device...i just easily get bored ? that's why..and i want customisation...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One question does linage 14.1 support substram theme engine
Shuvamilu said:
One question does linage 14.1 support substram theme engine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
? Not sure but i think i should support..
Hello,
i new user of Redmi Note 5 pro, so i want to start using this shiny phone
Im looking for most smooth kernel for our phone
I heard a lot of Kernels like icecold, kirks
but half of opinions was bad about them
So im asking what kernel is most stable and smooth? just to flash and forgot about him with keep in mind that this kernel is better than stock
make a twrp backup and (boot) and test some kernels.
muhviehstarr said:
make a twrp backup and (boot) and test some kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bad for me, i dont have too much time for this ( you know, work, family )
Thaths why in asking
test InsigniuX , its miui compatible.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/redmi-note-5-pro/development/insigniux-kernel-t3835939
i had forked the Version x8.1 Source in the past as a base to build a kali nethunter compatible kernel (the version was fast, stable + good battery runtime). The Dev also uses good Toolchains to build the Kernel.
after you flash a kernel, you should wipe the cache/dalvik and you have to reflash magisk if used.
test this kernel (non EAS Version)
https://forum.xda-developers.com/redmi-note-5-pro/development/kernel-purecoffee-kernel-t3913130
Best performance for a custom Kernel i have tested on the Note 5 yet
greets
muhviehstarr said:
test this kernel (non EAS Version)
https://forum.xda-developers.com/redmi-note-5-pro/development/kernel-purecoffee-kernel-t3913130
Best performance for a custom Kernel i have tested on the Note 5 yet
greets
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can confirm, purecoffee is awesome on MIUI, Sadly not compatible with MIUI Pie
the non EAS Version works well on MIUI pie
use the latest TWRP to install, redfox and co have Problems with the device detection in the updater-script
with the EAS Version the device booted to fastboot prompt.
muhviehstarr said:
the non EAS Version works well on MIUI pie
use the latest TWRP to install, redfox and co have Problems with the device detection in the updater-script
with the EAS Version the device booted to fastboot prompt.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you, i'll try with TWRP
N1ck474 said:
I can confirm, purecoffee is awesome on MIUI, Sadly not compatible with MIUI Pie
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How does it perform compared to stock kernel? I have no complaints on performance but better battery life is always welcome.
donkyshot said:
How does it perform compared to stock kernel? I have no complaints on performance but better battery life is always welcome.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's like faster, smoother with a Better battery life, try it
N1ck474 said:
It's like faster, smoother with a Better battery life, try it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, testing.
donkyshot said:
Thanks, testing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Returned to stock kernel, better battery stats to my phone. Curious about eas version, but reported here to boot to fastboot. Thanks anyway.
donkyshot said:
Returned to stock kernel, better battery stats to my phone. Curious about eas version, but reported here to boot to fastboot. Thanks anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
EAS doesn't work on MIUI, i can achieve 8/10h of SoT with pureCoffee, maybe it was just luck
N1ck474 said:
It's like faster, smoother with a Better battery life, try it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i can cornfirm a very good battery life
Stock is best Sir, custom kernel are only better in performance but thats all, battery life only derp on aosip is amazing, rest not that good in battery life in my testing. For normal man stock miui kernel best
latest EAS Version is working on xiaomi.eu miui 10 latest dev
its working great. till now. great standby power usage.
Version used:
https://cloud.it-kraut.net/s/QqfiFxnFdCCS99a/download
muhviehstarr said:
latest EAS Version is working on xiaomi.eu miui 10 latest dev
its working great. till now. great standby power usage.
Version used:
https://cloud.it-kraut.net/s/QqfiFxnFdCCS99a/download
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup it's work, previous version didn't work on xiaomi.eu PIE