I will buy a note 7. I have 2 options to go for exynos or Qualcomm version. I would like your opinion about wich one has the best performance for games and wich one has the best possibility to receive a developer future Cyanogenmod 13 build. Thank you
Enviado de meu SM-N920G usando Tapatalk
Snapdragon beats exynos in terms of performance. Exynos beats snapdragon in terms of possibilities of cyanogenmod builds.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mix1987 said:
Snapdragon beats exynos in terms of performance. Exynos beats snapdragon in terms of possibilities of cyanogenmod builds.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But cyanogenmod roms have always been developed priority for Qualcomm snapdragon versions in story of Galaxy phones
Enviado do meu iPad usando Tapatalk
calj17 said:
But cyanogenmod roms have always been developed priority for Qualcomm snapdragon versions in story of Galaxy phones
Enviado do meu iPad usando Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, i'm going to have to say that is backwards. Qualcomm is good for custom roms and mods while Exynos is the better performer.
Not Qualcomm's fault actually. Whichever phone US winds up getting will be harder to root because of the customary locked bootloaders US Telco overlords has decreed. I suspect in this case, as with the case of S7, is that Qualcomm's chip is harder to root because of the additional bootloader. Not because of the chipset. But I guess I shd have said if you aren't staying in the US, this doesn't apply. : )
http://androidforums.com/threads/u-...ve-locked-bootloaders-and-no-rooting.1012785/
Edit 1: typo
Edit 2: included link.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So should I go for exynos variant of note 7 if I want a future Cyanogenmod build?
Enviado de meu SM-N920G usando Tapatalk
Correct me if I'm wrong guys, but either way, we don't get Cyanogen do we?
For Snapdragon the Bootloader is locked so the possibility of a custom Recovery and ROM are rather bleak to none, no? I mean what are the odds that another EngBoot leaks for the Note 7? And even with that, people seem to have had a nightmare after Rooting their phones? Plus no TWRP, yet, is there?
For Exynos the Bootloader is unlocked so that's great, however I hear that Samsung doesn't release the source to bake CM for those phones. I will take this option cause at least we could have stable Root and optimized TW ROMs for the phone like the S7 Edge?
Lastly, correct me if I am wrong again, but according to all benchmarks and video reviews isn't the Exynos battery and performance always better than SD? Except the SD GPU edges out?
You pretty much nailed it on all counts.
If you want Cyanogenmod, the Galaxy S7, S7 Edge, and Note 7 are not the phones for you.
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
Can't you unlock the bootloader if the phone is payed off?
I payed off my S7 and called and had them unlock my bootloader on my phone. Won't that make it easier to root and install custom ROMs?
I'm asking because SP seems like the more likely candidate for Cyanogenmod. I also like Note 7 out of all the other android phones currently on the market. I'm a bit tempted on the Pixel XL, but the MicroSD and waterproof have it edging over the Pixel XL. I would like to think I could get the Note 7 from T-Mobile and then pay it off and when its payed off be able to install CM.
you will never have a working cm build for the note 7 or for any samsung phones for that matter..the only phone that had google experience was the galaxy s5
But doesn't S6 and before have CM builds? As well as the older notes?
What makes the Note 7 so much harder to eventually develop for?
Spud37 said:
But doesn't S6 and before have CM builds? As well as the older notes?
What makes the Note 7 so much harder to eventually develop for?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it is not that..they are able to boot into cm but things that will never work are the camera, gps, 3d graphics and some other things..not enough to keep it as a daily driver
hello00 said:
it is not that..they are able to boot into cm but things that will never work are the camera, gps, 3d graphics and some other things..not enough to keep it as a daily driver
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know that Galaxy S4 had all of those working, and from what I've found is that Galaxy S6 also look like they have all of those working. What is it about samsung that would not allow that?
Spud37 said:
I know that Galaxy S4 had all of those working, and from what I've found is that Galaxy S6 also look like they have all of those working. What is it about samsung that would not allow that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
please show me the cm build thread that have all of these working without bugs? because samsung has not released the necessary tool and without it..those bugs will never be fix and thats why they end up abandoning their project
hello00 said:
please show me the cm build thread that have all of these working without bugs? because samsung has not released the necessary tool and without it..those bugs will never be fix and thats why they end up abandoning their project
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All of them have some bugs but no where near what you have said. For the Galaxy S4 its been a while but checking their forum on here I see that they even have Android 6 builds. including CM13 which is kinda neat given its age. Most of the other things I have seen by searching. I used the S4 as my daily driver for the longest time. Though you are right that some of the threads I have found for the S6 say not a daily driver. I am a bit curious about why, and if that will ever be overcome. As in, in a year will there be builds for CM for the Note 7.
On that note what is the best phone or company for CM?
Well that's just not true....
mrkhigh said:
Well that's just not true....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which Part?
Many Samsungs has cm. Just not many anymore.
I must have been reading a different page... Someone said cm Roms were only on one ssmsung device.
Note 5 doesn't exactly have it...because the video recording will probably never work..accessing camera from other apps not working...
sent from my N920C
mrkhigh said:
Many Samsungs has cm. Just not many anymore.
I must have been reading a different page... Someone said cm Roms were only on one ssmsung device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I guess before last year I thought that the samsung devices were all supported by CM. That the samsung devices were the best ones with the best support for CM.
Caius_Marius said:
Note 5 doesn't exactly have it...because the video recording will probably never work..accessing camera from other apps not working...
sent from my N920C
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I have since read that the S6, and Note 5, namely the devices that came out last year, don't seem to work well with Cyanogenmod.
Related
Well, the thread title says all.
I'm not a developer and don't know if will be easy or not.
I ask for the experts, it will be easy for we get Note2 updates from the Note 3 or it is a different hardware and cannot be used the software from it?
Thanks
No, the update isn't from anther model, it's from Samsung,I mean, if Samsung want give it for us, it will be very very quickly, but Samsung do not want, because if note 2 get 4.3 too quickly, some people well not to but the new one. All about marketing.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
The device it is the easiest to port from is the Note 8.0 I think. They are very similar. Almost identical.
Though its still hard..
why is mod locking up all Note 3 threads?
Because they don't have anything to do with the Note 2, what is also considered as "off-topic" in a section dedicated to the Note 2.
To OP. Why do you bother even think about this?! As soon as Note 3 comes out you'll get an update. These threads will get locked soon.
nitrous² said:
Because they don't have anything to do with the Note 2, what is also considered as "off-topic" in a section dedicated to the Note 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Note 3 have nothing to do with Note 2? What?
Note 2 has several variants but none of their roms can be ported/flashed to either device..so Note3 rom will no way be ported to Note2
Also Note2 will get update after months of launching note3(because of their marketing policy-no need to explain)
nitrous² said:
Because they don't have anything to do with the Note 2, what is also considered as "off-topic" in a section dedicated to the Note 2.
To OP. Why do you bother even think about this?! As soon as Note 3 comes out you'll get an update. These threads will get locked soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that my next phone will not be a Samsung. When i bought i choose it because Samsung said Note 2 was getting all the updates till Android 5.0, so i thought that they have good update policy (my previous phone was a motorola defy, and same thing there, no updates).
And about the "As soon as Note 3 comes out you'll get an update" citation, i think your wrong. Samsung is pushing everyone to buy a new device and not to make a good update policy for old devices
rafaelw said:
I think that my next phone will not be a Samsung. When i bought i choose it because Samsung said Note 2 was getting all the updates till Android 5.0, so i thought that they have good update policy (my previous phone was a motorola defy, and same thing there, no updates).
And about the "As soon as Note 3 comes out you'll get an update" citation, i think your wrong. Samsung is pushing everyone to buy a new device and not to make a good update policy for old devices
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, c'mon. Of course they wan't you to buy their newest device!! That's business 101!! What do you complain about? For companies doing marketing?! And we don't even need to discuss wether the Note 2 will get future updates or not. Given that even the S2 will get (or got?) 4.2.2 (delivered with 2.3 and got updated to 2.3.6>4.0>4.0.4>4.1.1>4.1.2) that's 6 updates including 4.2.2!!! Evene if it'll be late, im pretty sure it'll come.
what's wrong with buying new phone? You're getting both a hardware and software update.
FinancialWar said:
what's wrong with buying new phone? You're getting both a hardware and software update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, consumption is always a good thing. Says Mr. "FinancialWar". Pun intended? :laugh::laugh:
When S4/S3/s2 ROM can be ported in galaxy s i9000 then why not note 3 ROM/features ported in note 2
ancient galaxy s i9000(s1) has more 4.3 custom ROMs than our note 2
Rajaasim1980 said:
When S4/S3/s2 ROM can be ported in galaxy s i9000 then why not note 3 ROM/features ported in note 2
ancient galaxy s i9000(s1) has more 4.3 custom ROMs than our note 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kind of stupid comparison isn't it?
would you rather use i9000 with 4.3 rom or Note 2 with 4.1.1 rom??
FinancialWar said:
Kind of stupid comparison isn't it?
would you rather use i9000 with 4.3 rom or Note 2 with 4.1.1 rom??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, its not stupid comparison .
I am using boht of them
but you did not get the point. did you?
I was saying that when JB 4.3 can be ported in old galaxy s with limited hardware and RAM then we can expect 4.3 for our note 2
It's called software optimization. ..
Not easy. .
And the note 3 is getting new s pen features in 4.3. . So Samsung does not want to release those features to note 2 before note 3 is launched.. plain simple. .just got to wait .
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
www.muktware.com/2013/12/cyanogenmod-source-code-samsung-galaxy-note-3-now-available/18304
The sources are also available for various versions of Note 3. With similar hardware, would this make porting CM for our tablet any easier?
Srikar_NBK said:
www.muktware.com/2013/12/cyanogenmod-source-code-samsung-galaxy-note-3-now-available/18304
The sources are also available for various versions of Note 3. With similar hardware, would this make porting CM for our tablet any easier?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd love me some CM on this tablet.
Srikar_NBK said:
www.muktware.com/2013/12/cyanogenmod-source-code-samsung-galaxy-note-3-now-available/18304
The sources are also available for various versions of Note 3. With similar hardware, would this make porting CM for our tablet any easier?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would imagine so, but isn't the note a snapdragon device? I know ours uses both depending on the model, but a lot of the devs hate exynos.
tkoreaper said:
I would imagine so, but isn't the note a snapdragon device? I know ours uses both depending on the model, but a lot of the devs hate exynos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Note 3 international version uses Exynos 5420, the same as P600 and 601.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exynos#List_of_Exynos_SoCs
And from the Muktware article, CM supports Note 3 International version
Hey, I did a lot of searching but couldn't find anything about this (surprisingly) so..:
Is somebody already working on a Cyanogenmod version for the Tab S / will there ever be one?
Yes it's being worked on. If the Dev cracks it you'll see a thread in Development.
wollvieh said:
Hey, I did a lot of searching but couldn't find anything about this (surprisingly) so..:
Is somebody already working on a Cyanogenmod version for the Tab S / will there ever be one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would find it unlikely due to the fact that is hasn't happened on the Note 2014, Note Pro, or Galaxy Tab Pro, or the Tab S, which all feature the same Exynos 5 based SoC, and all have far more custom rom and development work.
Freakstyler said:
I would find it unlikely due to the fact that is hasn't happened on the Note 2014, Note Pro, or Galaxy Tab Pro, or the Tab S, which all feature the same Exynos 5 based SoC, and all have far more custom rom and development work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The sheer awesomeness of the prospect makes it metaphysically more likely. I call this Awesome Theory and I just made it up.
Hi,
I would be interested if we can expect Cyanogenmod for this device? Just asking, because I am very interested in it and could not find any hint.
Thank you!
Florian
+1 here, I think yes because hardware is very similar with the 8.4 inch edition !
haris-100 said:
+1 here, I think yes because hardware is very similar with the 8.4 inch edition !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's NOT.
8.4 is the only recent Samsung Tab to have a Qualcomm Snapdragon 800, which makes it way more similar to other Qualcomm-equipped phones, including the Nexus 5. This makes development more or less easier.
Other Tabs, including the T520, use Samsung's Exynos, which is neither friendly to devs nor well documented. Development for any Exynos device usually takes much longer than Qualcomm.
Rest assured that CM13 currently still isn't complete, and even if you upgraded chances are you will find bugs and removed functions you aren't satisfied with.
Sent from Google Nexus 6P @ CM13
[WARNING: XDA One have not implemented "mark forum as read" - do not use]
crpalmer, who we all owe for getting cm12 and12.1 onto our devices, has said he plans to do it when he gets time.
Just be patient, it's far more love than Samsung have shown.
b1g1an said:
crpalmer, who we all owe for getting cm12 and12.1 onto our devices, has said he plans to do it when he gets time.
Just be patient, it's far more love than Samsung have shown.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right :good:
AndyYan said:
It's NOT.
8.4 is the only recent Samsung Tab to have a Qualcomm Snapdragon 800, which makes it way more similar to other Qualcomm-equipped phones, including the Nexus 5. This makes development more or less easier.
Other Tabs, including the T520, use Samsung's Exynos, which is neither friendly to devs nor well documented. Development for any Exynos device usually takes much longer than Qualcomm.
Rest assured that CM13 currently still isn't complete, and even if you upgraded chances are you will find bugs and removed functions you aren't satisfied with.
Sent from Google Nexus 6P @ CM13
[WARNING: XDA One have not implemented "mark forum as read" - do not use]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, my mistake !
Is right
Very properly ! I agree with LOL...
[6.0.x|SM-T520|BETA] Unofficial CyanogenMod 13.0 for the Tab Pro 10.1 (picassowifi)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...-xsm-t520beta-unofficial-cyanogenmod-t3372507
1.I am in searching of a new phone, and i stopped here on the oneplus 3 forum. I saw there are more models (a3000, a3003 dont really know more) around , so i dont know which one to buy?
And i just want to know if i can flash anycustom rom i want on any model of the Oneplus3.
2.Is worth the extra $ for oneplus 3t?
3.Which one has better rom development on xda ONEPLUS 3 or 3T ?
A3000 is American/Chinese, A3003 is EU/worldwide.
All ROMs can be flashed on all model numbers.
Sent from my OnePlus 3 using Tapatalk
Explorer23 said:
A3 more000 is American/Chinese, A3003 is EU/worldwide.
All ROMs can be flashed on all model numbers.
Sent from my OnePlus 3 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about 2nd and 3rd questions. Any ideea?
RootNightmareX said:
What about 2nd and 3rd questions. Any ideea?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2. That comes down to personal choice. I'd say the original 3 has slightly better price/performance - 3T is indeed better on paper, but those differences are almost negligible in real life. That said, I may be a bit biased towards the 3 [emoji14]
Worth mentioning that 3 is not being produced any more so it may be hard to get now.
3. At the moment the OnePlus 3 has better dev support. But 3T is catching up. And in future they will probably have the same support - literally the same ROMs. We already know that kernels can be made to work on both models and AFAIK OnePlus is working on a unified ROM for both devices (which means that custom ROMs should also be able to work on both).
Sent from my OnePlus 3 using Tapatalk
Explorer23 said:
2. That comes down to personal choice. I'd say the original 3 has slightly better price/performance - 3T is indeed better on paper, but those differences are almost negligible in real life. That said, I may be a bit biased towards the 3 [emoji14]
Worth mentioning that 3 is not being produced any more so it may be hard wto get now.
3. At the moment the OnePlus 3 has better dev support. But 3T is catching up. And in future they will probably have the same support - literally the same ROMs. We already know that kernels can be made to work on both models and AFAIK OnePlus is working on a unified ROM for both devices (which means that custom ROMs should also be able to work on both).
Sent from my OnePlus 3 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How it is possible for a kernel/rom to work on 2 different chipsets 820/821
RootNightmareX said:
How it is possible for a kernel/rom to work on 2 different chipsets 820/821
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm way too lazy to look into it ... better ask some developer [emoji1]
I guess it detects the chipset and selects the profile accordingly.
Probably not possible to do with completely different chipsets, but 820 and 821 are practically the same, just have different clocks (and probably voltages).
Check out blu_spark kernel by eng.stk in 3T development thread. That one works on Marshmallow ROMs on both devices.
Sent from my OnePlus 3 using Tapatalk
RootNightmareX said:
How it is possible for a kernel/rom to work on 2 different chipsets 820/821
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://www.xda-developers.com/sult...rom-approach-on-the-oneplus-3-and-oneplus-3t/
Here u go
It's simple.
If you want big development you choose 3. For 3t development it's small. I don't think many users/developers will get rid of 3 to buy 3t.
Update: we already have unified ROMs also (for example Resurrection Remix 5.8.0). So that proves that in the future both devices will share development.
Sent from my OnePlus 3 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 12:38 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:37 PM ----------
null0seven said:
It's simple.
If you want big development you choose 3. For 3t development it's small. I don't think many users/developers will get rid of 3 to buy 3t.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check last few comments ... With unified ROMs and kernels the development is essentially the same.
Sent from my OnePlus 3 using Tapatalk