Related
i read something in the net while i was surfing yesterday, you can look here: http://www.androidcentral.com/motorola-atrix-hd-gets-official-cyanogenmod-support
and then reading these lines made me surprised(maybe getting official cyanogenmod support for ancora is impossible after this moment but who kowns?)
If an Android device has enough of a following, and there are developer(s) willing to commit (no pun intended) to maintaining the device in the official CyanogenMod source tree, this device becomes officially supported -- and receives official builds of the CyanogenMod ROM.
if someone be maintainer for our device can we get official support from CyanogenMod?
is this really possible?
ı mean our device source code are available in github(kernel source device source and vendor files)
maybe forking our device source into CyanogenMod source tree can make this possible or am ı wrong??
maybe this is a bulsh*it after this moment but just wondering
for example galaxy s is getting official support from Cyanogenmod still if im not mistaken mr. pawit is their maintainer and developer
ım waiting your answers brothers what do you think about that? @arco68 @arsradu @LeroViten @honeyx and all ancora devs
with my best regards :good:
The SGW was for more than 3 years without official CM support and we didn´t miss anything, so I don´t think this is that much important for the rest of it´s counted days.
honeyx said:
The SGW was for more than 3 years without official CM support and we didn´t miss anything, so I don´t think this is that much important for the rest of it´s counted days.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ı understood bro but is there any hope for galaxy w? return of ancora :good: and also ı understood that from your comment : technically this is possible,galaxy w can get official support from CM Team but this is unnecessary for this dead device isnt it?
I simply don´t think this will happen because you have to look from their point of view.
1. this device is a low activity device in Amercian terms. 2. So never was that popular to get their attention. 3. is already old and not up to date. 4. It´s hype time is almost over and many earlier SGW users are going to replace it. 5. CM is going a different route now and will be focusing on their "device" they are going to launch soon. And finally 6. Why should they change this now after already 3 years?
So if I were CM I would look for the future not looking back to the past with it´s outdated devices and not even waste a single tought about devices like the SGW.
Is this bad for the SGW owners? As long we are having Devs like Radu who are porting the latest ROMs to this device it really doesn´t matter CM is supporting it officially or not supporting it.
So what do you expect from being supported by CM? You only would be able to install the latest nightlys launched by the CM team with all the bugs in the CM code included and maybe some day fixed. A Dev who is porting their CM sources of course has to fight with these bugs too, but also cares to fix the most important ones.
I asked arco68 a while ago, and he said it's because of legacy camera drivers that we are unsupported.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
SGWUser said:
I asked arco68 a while ago, and he said it's because of legacy camera drivers that we are unsupported.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
auhh thats true sir arne is right as always anyway thanx man for informing us
regards :good:
I don't think so...anyway, we already have the stable n smooth ROM so far. Without Officail, it's does not matter at all.
Hello sir @arco68
First of all huge thanx for your great work on our Wonders
And secondly i wonder something
We are using s5k4ecgx sensor for back camera
And if we add the following patches and if we use v4l2 for camera driver, Can we use CAF based qcom cameraHAL?
-http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg50380.html
And probably if we use new qcom cameraHAL, then we wont need legacy stuff the CM doesnt like(MemoryHeapBase,Overlay)
Then maybe we can get cm nightlies
Maybe porting new camera Hal to our phone can be hard but we must not give up. We are so close to official CM after ION i think. We can do it and we can success :good:
Thanx
Regards
hack4er said:
Hello sir @arco68
First of all huge thanx for your great work on our Wonders
And secondly i wonder something
We are using s5k4ecgx sensor for back camera
And if we add the following patches and if we use v4l2 for camera driver, Can we use CAF based qcom cameraHAL?
-http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg50380.html
And probably if we use new qcom cameraHAL, then we wont need legacy stuff the CM doesnt like(MemoryHeapBase,Overlay)
Then maybe we can get cm nightlies
Maybe porting new camera Hal to our phone can be hard but we must not give up. We are so close to official CM after ION i think. We can do it and we can success :good:
Thanx
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would be so f... Awesome *-*
Please we need someone who knows how to do this
i post this in here as i currently have no permission to write in development forum. as our main guys, deedwar seems busy and bpaul broke his device, i'm trying to learn to fill the space.
note:
this is a port of billchen & mickybart's work, some of their works is specific to nozomi. and i haven't got the chance (and enough knowledge) to port it. so it bounds to have less features.
a lot were untested, as i currently broke my sdcard, lost my headset, and have no other device with hdmi or nfc capabilities.
but if you brave enough...
known issues:
bluetooth unusable, crash too much.
no fm radio, probably never will.
what's in there:
CM 12.1, still in staging, consider it pre-alpha quality
linux kernel 3.4.106, with billchen & mickybart's works
twrp 2.8.6.0
download:
cm-12.1 20150329: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8r29Ki1SF-dZjdaMVBhMVpMdmc&authuser=0
thank you..
sabcpj said:
i post this in here as i currently have no permission to write in development forum. as our main guys, deedwar seems busy and bpaul broke his device, i'm trying to learn to fill the space.
note:
this is a port of billchen & mickybart's work, some of their works is specific to nozomi. and i haven't got the chance (and enough knowledge) to port it. so it bounds to have less features.
a lot were untested, as i currently broke my sdcard, lost my headset, and have no other device with hdmi or nfc capabilities.
but if you brave enough...
known issues:
bluetooth unusable, crash too much.
no fm radio, probably never will.
what's in there:
CM 12.1, still in staging, consider it pre-alpha quality
linux kernel 3.4.106, with billchen & mickybart's works
twrp 2.8.6.0
download:
cm-12.1 20150329: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8r29Ki1SF-dZjdaMVBhMVpMdmc&authuser=0
thank you..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try get Bluetooth and FM Radio from 5.0.2 to try test if get work with it ... just substitute the modules and copy the fixes to Firmware and catch the logcat if don't work... deedwar normally understand better this type of problems... i don't remember any more how to get it running =# i know about they port some blobs from Nexus 4 (MAKO Blobs) because the SoC have compatibility to some drivers ;D
anyway is good to see someone take the lead to continue the developing process to this phone ;D
afaik every blob taken from outside of our own device, is always about display, gpu blob. yes, opensemc used to take from mako, billchen use htc one's blob. but it's only gpu, nothing related to bluetooth.
i think it's about cm's differences with aosp that creates the problem. my own build of 5.0.2 has the same problem. maybe next time i'll try to build aosp to know about it better.
thanks for your pointer though.
Charging doesn't work, both offline and online. thats the most thing that makes this rom can't be used as daily driver
Anyone working on this ROM anymore?
sabcpj said:
i post this in here as i currently have no permission to write in development forum. as our main guys, deedwar seems busy and bpaul broke his device, i'm trying to learn to fill the space.
note:
this is a port of billchen & mickybart's work, some of their works is specific to nozomi. and i haven't got the chance (and enough knowledge) to port it. so it bounds to have less features.
a lot were untested, as i currently broke my sdcard, lost my headset, and have no other device with hdmi or nfc capabilities.
but if you brave enough...
known issues:
bluetooth unusable, crash too much.
no fm radio, probably never will.
what's in there:
CM 12.1, still in staging, consider it pre-alpha quality
linux kernel 3.4.106, with billchen & mickybart's works
twrp 2.8.6.0
download:
cm-12.1 20150329: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8r29Ki1SF-dZjdaMVBhMVpMdmc&authuser=0
thank you..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When the bugs get fixed!
Tnx very much
Thanks!! is Bluetooth issue fixed ? any updates ?
Is there a way that someone can make a Lollipop ROM for SM-T210R? Preferably CM 12.1 or a stock ROM. I have seen multiple people on these forums ask when this will happen. I've seen the Galaxy Tab 2 AND the ORIGINAL Galaxy Tab get Lollipop before Tab 3. The Tab 4 already got it...
Thanks, and I hope that we will see a day where everyone will have the latest version of Android on their devices...
TrendingTech said:
Is there a way that someone can make a Lollipop ROM for SM-T210R? Preferably CM 12.1 or a stock ROM. I have seen multiple people on these forums ask when this will happen. I've seen the Galaxy Tab 2 AND the ORIGINAL Galaxy Tab get Lollipop before Tab 3. The Tab 4 already got it...
Thanks, and I hope that we will see a day where everyone will have the latest version of Android on their devices...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tab 3 has closed source I wouldnt expect any CM in the future
Sent from my white GT-I9305
why?
Minto107 said:
Tab 3 has closed source I wouldnt expect any CM in the future
Sent from my white GT-I9305
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How come, I don't understand, there are serveral other ROM's for KITKAT, why would it be impossible to build a Lollipop ROM? I have NO idea how to build a rom, otherwise I would give it a try.
What makes it so difficult?
We don't have drivers to build any custom ROM rather than Samsung based one. We probably can have MIUI based on Sammy but if you want custom ROMs you've chosen a wrong tablet. Tab 2 7 would do a job correctly
Sent from my white GT-I9305
Minto107 said:
We don't have drivers to build any custom ROM rather than Samsung based one. We probably can have MIUI based on Sammy but if you want custom ROMs you've chosen a wrong tablet. Tab 2 7 would do a job correctly
Sent from my white GT-I9305
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
isn't there a Galaxy Tab 3 Lite lollipop ROM that we can port over to SM-T210R?
TrendingTech said:
isn't there a Galaxy Tab 3 Lite lollipop ROM that we can port over to SM-T210R?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None of TAB 3 family devices got 5.x so there's nothing to port. Tab 3 7,8,10 won't be updated to 5.x
Wysłane z mojego Lenovo TAB S8-50L przy użyciu Tapatalka
Tab 3 8.0 has unofficial cm-12.1
Tab 3 8.0 has unofficial cm-12.1 and tab 3 10.1 also got it,
Grynot said:
Tab 3 8.0 has unofficial cm-12.1 and tab 3 10.1 also got it,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Omg but 8.0 uses Exynos 10.1 uses Intel and 7 uses ****ty Marvel CPU! You don't have source so no CM for you
Wysłane z mojego Lenovo TAB S8-50L przy użyciu Tapatalka
So, im just stuck with effin 4.2? Since i originally rooted over a year ago, i have then tried to go back to stock to update, but ii can never get an ota update.....im just frustrated with all this. Trying to teach myself and getting stuck, SUCKS!!! I KNOW I DONT USE it to its fullest potential.....ANY help would rock....oh and would help my brain hurt LESS!! Thanks! !
rheecollinskelley said:
So, im just stuck with effin 4.2? Since i originally rooted over a year ago, i have then tried to go back to stock to update, but ii can never get an ota update.....im just frustrated with all this. Trying to teach myself and getting stuck, SUCKS!!! I KNOW I DONT USE it to its fullest potential.....ANY help would rock....oh and would help my brain hurt LESS!! Thanks! !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know that Tab 3 8.0 is only 4.2.2 supported, not even close to KitKat, although you can find yourselves SM-T21x Kit Kat roms. Lollipop will not be supported by any chance, even for custom roms man!
It really depends on the amount of work you are willing to do.
Some parts are binary blob only *at this time*, but may change in the future.
For example, the Vivante GPU driver has some patches under review for the mainline Linux kernel and a open source driver in progress (look up etnaviv).
If you *really* want the Tab 3 7.0" to have Lollipop, you have to be willing to do some work. Maybe try to get some of the drivers that are used in the device into the mainline kernel. Maybe get basic functionality working.
In any case, it really is up to the community at this point, and we are part of the community.
vorpalblade77 said:
It really depends on the amount of work you are willing to do.
Some parts are binary blob only *at this time*, but may change in the future.
For example, the Vivante GPU driver has some patches under review for the mainline Linux kernel and a open source driver in progress (look up etnaviv).
If you *really* want the Tab 3 7.0" to have Lollipop, you have to be willing to do some work. Maybe try to get some of the drivers that are used in the device into the mainline kernel. Maybe get basic functionality working.
In any case, it really is up to the community at this point, and we are part of the community.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but XDA is full of noobs that only asks when, why it takes so long time... Bringing Lollipop to TAB 3 7inch is very hard work... This tablet wasn't a beast, since release date it was low end tablet with such tragic performance. For such noobs who just want and doesn't want to help I've got an advice. Get Nexus 7 2013... 6.0 on board, noob friendly
Wysłane z mojego Lenovo TAB S8-50L przy użyciu Tapatalka
As I know so far, Marvell didn't release source codes for Galaxy Tab 3, so it's impossible to build CM12 for this device.
DroidTwe4kz said:
As I know so far, Marvell didn't release source codes for Galaxy Tab 3, so it's impossible to build CM12 for this device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I *thought* everything that was necessary to build a working ROM was in Samsung's source dumps. Maybe not all the information required, but all the source code.
For that matter, I was under the impression that the unofficial Cyanogenmod port was working (Cyanogenmod 11) with an unofficial kernel.
Am I wrong?
If I am, then that might be why I have yet to successfully build a booting recovery, but other people have.
vorpalblade77 said:
I *thought* everything that was necessary to build a working ROM was in Samsung's source dumps. Maybe not all the information required, but all the source code.
For that matter, I was under the impression that the unofficial Cyanogenmod port was working (Cyanogenmod 11) with an unofficial kernel.
Am I wrong?
If I am, then that might be why I have yet to successfully build a booting recovery, but other people have.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@gr8nole built unofficial CM11 from his own source. He wrote device specific tree I think.
vorpalblade77 said:
I *thought* everything that was necessary to build a working ROM was in Samsung's source dumps. Maybe not all the information required, but all the source code.
For that matter, I was under the impression that the unofficial Cyanogenmod port was working (Cyanogenmod 11) with an unofficial kernel.
Am I wrong?
If I am, then that might be why I have yet to successfully build a booting recovery, but other people have.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only sources that Samsung provides is kernel sources. That is not nearly enough to build a completely working rom.
DroidTwe4kz said:
@gr8nole built unofficial CM11 from his own source. He wrote device specific tree I think.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I did build from my own device tree, but there were other devs that contributed a lot of the early work on that tree. I'm not going to try to mention all the names because I don't want to leave anyone out. But, suffice it to say, it wasn't just me. :good:
To wrap up this post, the reason I gave up on CM for that device is because the Marvel hardware was too difficult (for me) to get working properly. Things like Wifi and hardware acceleration never worked well (or at all) and I don't have the ability to get them working any better. With essentially no other Marvel based devices to use as a guide, it was beyond my capabilities.
gr8nole said:
The only sources that Samsung provides is kernel sources. That is not nearly enough to build a completely working rom.
Yes, I did build from my own device tree, but there were other devs that contributed a lot of the early work on that tree. I'm not going to try to mention all the names because I don't want to leave anyone out. But, suffice it to say, it wasn't just me. :good:
To wrap up this post, the reason I gave up on CM for that device is because the Marvel hardware was too difficult (for me) to get working properly. Things like Wifi and hardware acceleration never worked well (or at all) and I don't have the ability to get them working any better. With essentially no other Marvel based devices to use as a guide, it was beyond my capabilities.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You already did more than enough for our device and I'm thankful for that. Someone will continue to build CM based on your source.
gr8nole said:
To wrap up this post, the reason I gave up on CM for that device is because the Marvel hardware was too difficult (for me) to get working properly. Things like Wifi and hardware acceleration never worked well (or at all) and I don't have the ability to get them working any better. With essentially no other Marvel based devices to use as a guide, it was beyond my capabilities.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For hardware acceleration, did you ever look at the etnaviv project? I know that they are working on getting patches upstreamed for the GPU on the SM-T210 (Vivante GC 1000)?
For that matter, the Marvell SD8787 wifi chip has firmware mainlined (as of 2011, updated in 2015) and has driver support in "drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sdio.h" as of commit 4a7f5db1 (take a look at CONFIG_MWIFIEX). I don't know if its worth attempting to backport or not (some issues may have been fixed). Maybe look at the linux-firmware tree?
I'm pretty certain that at one point Marvell was looking at getting a device tree for the PXA986/PXA988 into the mainline kernel, but I don't think they succeeded.
Parts on the SM-T210R that I haven't found in the mainline kernel is the touchscreen. I haven't looked at everything else yet, and I'm not *absolutely* certain that the touchscreen isn't in the mainline kernel either (I might be looking at a config option and assuming the wrong thing from Samsung's sources).
EDIT1: I've been trying to build cyanogenmod on systems that aren't officially supported by AOSP, which is why I may have never been able to build it myself and *actually* contribute and check to see if etnaviv works, and if the mainline driver works better. Anyway, thanks for your work gr8nole (and everyone else's).
EDIT2: For SD8787 bluetooth support, look at CONFIG_BT_MRVL/CONFIG_BT_MRVL_SDIO
vorpalblade77 said:
For hardware acceleration, did you ever look at the etnaviv project? I know that they are working on getting patches upstreamed for the GPU on the SM-T210 (Vivante GC 1000)?
For that matter, the Marvell SD8787 wifi chip has firmware mainlined (as of 2011, updated in 2015) and has driver support in "drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sdio.h" as of commit 4a7f5db1 (take a look at CONFIG_MWIFIEX). I don't know if its worth attempting to backport or not (some issues may have been fixed). Maybe look at the linux-firmware tree?
I'm pretty certain that at one point Marvell was looking at getting a device tree for the PXA986/PXA988 into the mainline kernel, but I don't think they succeeded.
Parts on the SM-T210R that I haven't found in the mainline kernel is the touchscreen. I haven't looked at everything else yet, and I'm not *absolutely* certain that the touchscreen isn't in the mainline kernel either (I might be looking at a config option and assuming the wrong thing from Samsung's sources).
EDIT1: I've been trying to build cyanogenmod on systems that aren't officially supported by AOSP, which is why I may have never been able to build it myself and *actually* contribute and check to see if etnaviv works, and if the mainline driver works better. Anyway, thanks for your work gr8nole (and everyone else's).
EDIT2: For SD8787 bluetooth support, look at CONFIG_BT_MRVL/CONFIG_BT_MRVL_SDIO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't looked at any of this in a long time, and have no real desire to at this point.
gr8nole said:
I haven't looked at any of this in a long time, and have no real desire to at this point.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair enough. I'll probably look into once I know I have my build environment set up correctly. E.g., I can build a recovery and have it work correctly.
Hi Everyone,
I've built Cyanogenmod with CM made patches to include the latest kernel from Oppo's Project Spectrum, thereby supporting the new Find 7 LCD panels. Please make backups and let your fellow Android flashaholics know your results.
This build is for LVM storage only.
Known issues:
The standard CM updater will likely break this modified rom. Please only update by flashing builds from this thread.
Sources:
Cyanogenmod Github
Patch #1
Patch #2
Wuxianlin's LVM device tree
Download:
cm-13.0-20160303-UNOFFICIAL-find7s.zip - Current
cm-13.0-20160301-UNOFFICIAL-find7.zip
THIS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL AND POTENTIALLY UNSTABLE BUILD - ALWAYS BACKUP.
I'll keep uploading builds if there's enough interest. Please post feedback below.
So you have tested them or not?
maxwen said:
So you have tested them or not?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My results were that Cyanogenmod booted fine, but I'm on LVM so couldn't test properly. I haven't tested Nameless out yet but will next chance I get.
Slightly unrelated - Thank you for getting OmniRom on a kernel with the new LCD support so early, you've saved my Find7 for these past few months!
Pojiku said:
My results were that Cyanogenmod booted fine, but I'm on LVM so couldn't test properly. I haven't tested Nameless out yet but will next chance I get.
Slightly unrelated - Thank you for getting OmniRom on a kernel with the new LCD support so early, you've saved my Find7 for these past few months!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, install and boot works fine, display works fine, but not LVM supported
Anyway thanks for your work, i will wait for new build with lvm support.
Thanks :good:
Since Nameless had a few issues I don't have the time to fix, I've decided to focus on Cyanogenmod builds.
The latest CM build (2015-03-03) fixes screen gestures and switches to LVM storage.
Could you build for x9007/6?
Отправлено с моего Find7 через Tapatalk
Pojiku said:
Since Nameless had a few issues I don't have the time to fix, I've decided to focus on Cyanogenmod builds.
The latest CM build (2015-03-03) fixes screen gestures and switches to LVM storage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah it works! I have found only a serious bug: i have no sounds of any kind: no music, notifications, etc.
Everything else works or seems to works fine: 4g, wifi, calls, everything.
Thanks so much for the rom, long time waiting for this.
Pojiku said:
Slightly unrelated - Thank you for getting OmniRom on a kernel with the new LCD support so early, you've saved my Find7 for these past few months!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are welcome - if you have any more questions just contact me
I've flashed this rom and from my experience, the only real bug that is here is the fact that sound does not work at all unless using headphones. Could you by any chance port MaxxAudio from the original ColorOS onto this or the Camera?
Pojiku said:
...I'll keep uploading builds if there's enough interest. Please post feedback below.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Pojiku.
Good job man. Don't wait if there wiil be interest to upload builds. Go my friend because i'm sure many find 7's owners are waiting for this impatiently in particular those who own a find 7 with new lcd panel like me. I m on omni, it s a very good rom with a very good dev. Today due to an incompatibility, i m forced to stay on an old omni build and cannot update. So i think that your rom could be a solution for me. I will wait a new build fixing the sound issue and be sure i will flash your rom to test it.
Thank you for your invest and your time.
Good luck.
---------- Post added at 05:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:47 AM ----------
Thank you for getting OmniRom on a kernel with the new LCD support so early, you've saved my Find7 for these past few months!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that goes for me too. Without maxwen I'll still be on color os or spectrum both of which are bugged.
Thanks Max
Hi Pojiku
I ve tried the lastest build and i m vey exciting. Please continue your work and release a new build to fix the sound issue.
Can't wait lol.
Due to lack of Clear Kernel Source, this thread is in violation of GPL License as well as XDA Rules. Hence it is closed.
OP Check your PM and respond in order to get it reopened.
Hello everyone,
the question and disscussion is:
Do we get Lineage OS support in the Future? it does not matter if unofficial or official, but what do you think?
I saw the LeEco le Max 2 get some unofficial support, so it could be that some Devs will try it.
It would be awesome *_*
I think the problem is, that the community isn't that big like for the le Max 2, but maybe it will get bigger in the future.
What do you think? :good:
I'm running my own custom image of LineageOS 13.0. All is working as expected, but I don't have time to clean all the stuff to share it with public. I uploaded my sources that works in https://www.github.com/corvusmod, so if someone wants to build it, feel free
For L14 version, camera is not working already and will not work until Leeco release N for Pro3
I think, it's not discussion, but it is a question. So, it should be in "QUESTIONS & ANSWERS". Le Max 2 have bigger community, because this phone is cheaper and cheapest Le Max 2 was for 180-200$. This mobile is older. Our Le Pro 3 have few months and in future it could have more community and ROMs like this.
corvus said:
I'm running my own custom image of LineageOS 13.0. All is working as expected, but I don't have time to clean all the stuff to share it with public. I uploaded my sources that works in https://www.github.com/corvusmod, so if someone wants to build it, feel free
For L14 version, camera is not working already and will not work until Leeco release N for Pro3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wooow! Someone interested?
It would be awesome!
:fingers-crossed:
Who could we talk to in order to get official support?
I dont know, but to get official support there should be at first a stable unofficial lineage OS Version. I do not know much about creating ROMs but i hope someone does and will create a masterpiece for le pro 3
I hope so
I can continue cleaning of the LOS13. I have quite a bit of free time and want to get started on a project. If corvus doesn't mind, I'll make a thread on my progress and, eventually, some stable builds.
corvus said:
I'm running my own custom image of LineageOS 13.0. All is working as expected, but I don't have time to clean all the stuff to share it with public. I uploaded my sources that works in https://www.github.com/corvusmod, so if someone wants to build it, feel free
For L14 version, camera is not working already and will not work until Leeco release N for Pro3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Corvus,
I've been trying to build slim from the repo you forked, but it keeps telling me I have no recovery, and ends up erroring out. I tried on ubuntu 16.04 lts though, could be my issue. Gonna try your lineage 13 version.
jts2111 said:
I can continue cleaning of the LOS13. I have quite a bit of free time and want to get started on a project. If corvus doesn't mind, I'll make a thread on my progress and, eventually, some stable builds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would be awesome. I will try your build!
Good project looking forward to
manuelbvb said:
Would be awesome. I will try your build!
Good project looking forward to
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll edit a link to the thread I make with to-dos based off the source code I can see.
Here's where I'll post progress!: https://forum.xda-developers.com/le-pro3/development/progress-lineage-os-13-t3546126
jts2111 said:
I can continue cleaning of the LOS13. I have quite a bit of free time and want to get started on a project. If corvus doesn't mind, I'll make a thread on my progress and, eventually, some stable builds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi @jts2111,
No problem from my side. TS team shared with me the sources, I modified them for Lineage, and try to do some tweaks (already uploades) and have some more in local, but causes some problems, so I didn't upload them.
With this image I get more than 3 days of batt time and a sot of 8 hours, so it's good for me. My only concern is that I was not able to make Camera2 HAL working to get manual settings. But I have little time to test, so any help from this side is welcome.
Only one thing, please, share the code in a public repo so TS, me or any other developer can see it and work together.
Thanks
---------- Post added at 10:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:32 PM ----------
jts2111 said:
I can continue cleaning of the LOS13. I have quite a bit of free time and want to get started on a project. If corvus doesn't mind, I'll make a thread on my progress and, eventually, some stable builds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
robertzas said:
Hi Corvus,
I've been trying to build slim from the repo you forked, but it keeps telling me I have no recovery, and ends up erroring out. I tried on ubuntu 16.04 lts though, could be my issue. Gonna try your lineage 13 version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For Slim, please use the fork from where I get the code. See it in github. It's TS source, so it should work.
corvus said:
Hi @jts2111,
No problem from my side. TS team shared with me the sources, I modified them for Lineage, and try to do some tweaks (already uploades) and have some more in local, but causes some problems, so I didn't upload them.
With this image I get more than 3 days of batt time and a sot of 8 hours, so it's good for me. My only concern is that I was not able to make Camera2 HAL working to get manual settings. But I have little time to test, so any help from this side is welcome.
Only one thing, please, share the code in a public repo so TS, me or any other developer can see it and work together.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I forked your repo and shared it in my post. I'll work on what you mentioned. One of my top (long term) goals is complete CTS compatibility. With safetynet passed, there'd be nothing that would really pull you back to stock.
Definitely, I'm preparing the Kernel code after code to ensure we get a very clean and functional Kernel for the future, instead of just merging the one from LeEco with more than 80% of unneeded bits due to their other devices being at the same place (shameful).
This will get a ~30MB Kernel reduced to around 12MB and thus make custom ROMs perform a lot better and boot immensely faster after all.
I'd only need one sense of common attitude which is asking LeTV to keep the Kernel source up-to-date when they launch OTAs as well, I've seen some comments regarding their image stabilization fix at latest release (OTA) which is only possible at Kernel/blob level and thus if we want to have this feature working (at least partially) we need the source code "right off the bat" to get those fixes. Please, make pressure on their forums for 5.9 x720 Kernel source code and for nougat preview builds, I'd appreciate to even help with their own EUI for that matter, I'll see if I can get in touch with them concerning those points.
Do we have someone from China or someone with experience with Chinese so we can attach our discussions there?
I do hope they keep the open source up to date, but it seems they are doing the bare minimum to apply to Google's open source policy. I'm in the US, so I have the x727 with 1 SIM. We would need someone to test with a x720 as well.
@GalaticStryder, Leeco only will post the sources needed to avoid license problems with GPL, so dont wait much help from them. But we can ask...
@jts2111, I have a 720, so I can test your builds.
@jts2111
I received my X720 this week and I could also test your experimental build.
It would be nice to already start with a LineageOS custom ROM as first ROM to avoid a lot of reinstallation / reconfiguration of apps with other kind of custom ROMs.