Samsung Pay Beta Review - T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

http://www.reddit.com/r/GalaxyS6/comments/3eghcv/ive_been_using_samsungpay_for_about_10_days_now/
Can't wait...

See Portal, Samsung Pay won't work on Knox tripped devices.
Pp.

Well that's a real shame, but unfortunately completely expected. You either get all the bloatware and poorly tuned stock software with working Samsung Pay or you get to customize everything with custom ROMs and kernels. I'll take the custom ROMs and kernels. Too bad, Samsung, you're not getting my purchase history to monetize.
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk

Malnilion said:
Well that's a real shame, but unfortunately completely expected. You either get all the bloatware and poorly tuned stock software with working Samsung Pay or you get to customize everything with custom ROMs and kernels. I'll take the custom ROMs and kernels. Too bad, Samsung, you're not getting my purchase history to monetize.
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
with the of8 leak and package disabler, it's really not anywhere nearly as bad as you make it sound.

tofu- said:
with the of8 leak and package disabler, it's really not anywhere nearly as bad as you make it sound.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't seem as bad until you've tried a recent Unikernel build and experience the unrivaled smoothness that this device should have had from the beginning. I've been running OF8 since the day after Sunderwear put up the sideloadable update.zip and while it's much better than OF6, it just is a whole new level with Unikernel.
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk

I'm tired of paying for features that I'll never get to use due to my need to tinker with stuff...

shoresteve626 said:
I'm tired of paying for features that I'll never get to use due to my need to tinker with stuff...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Makes you want a Nexus doesn't it...
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk

cvsolidx17 said:
Makes you want a Nexus doesn't it...
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really. Nexus doesn't offer anything to lose out on such as Samsung Pay, etc. Either way, you don't get to use Samsung Pay .

cvsolidx17 said:
Makes you want a Nexus doesn't it...
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just got my nexus and loving it....

Xperia?

whittikins said:
Not really. Nexus doesn't offer anything to lose out on such as Samsung Pay, etc. Either way, you don't get to use Samsung Pay .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My thoughts exactly....

Related

Samsung is locking out root at the kernel level

It appears that Samsung has disabled root at the kernel level on new kernels for the 9500 and 9505. It looks like Samsung is going back on developer community support in favor of enterprise security.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2263788
I hope they don't do that to us in the states - originally I thought it was because of the Exynos exploits but the 9505 is a Snapdragon 600 device.
Sent from my SGH-T999
EtherealRemnant said:
It appears that Samsung has disabled root at the kernel level on new kernels for the 9500 and 9505. It looks like Samsung is going back on developer community support in favor of enterprise security.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2263788
I hope they don't do that to us in the states - originally I thought it was because of the Exynos exploits but the 9505 is a Snapdragon 600 device.
Sent from my SGH-T999
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How can I get this phone, but I do not know if I like it very much
not have enough money to
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EY3B5qG-hg&feature=youtu.be
What??
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
EtherealRemnant said:
It appears that Samsung has disabled root at the kernel level on new kernels for the 9500 and 9505. It looks like Samsung is going back on developer community support in favor of enterprise security.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2263788
I hope they don't do that to us in the states - originally I thought it was because of the Exynos exploits but the 9505 is a Snapdragon 600 device.
Sent from my SGH-T999
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bbobarino said:
What??
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is also a very nice woman told
but I do not have money to take them
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_HdFLYH1Vg
What?
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
bbobarino said:
What?
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
choto what ?
What do you think caused by continuous:cyclops:
Can we get on topic please?
This is worrisome stuff - it may not affect those of you with a device right now but if it ends up being enacted across the board, you better hope that you never break it.
This is the first time I've seen this implemented on the kernel level. It is by far the most effective way to prevent root as it keeps you from being able to switch to the root user. Without the ability to do that, all software exploits are worthless. And good luck exploiting the kernel itself.
Sent from my SGH-T999
EtherealRemnant said:
Can we get on topic please?
This is worrisome stuff - it may not affect those of you with a device right now but if it ends up being enacted across the board, you better hope that you never break it.
This is the first time I've seen this implemented on the kernel level. It is by far the most effective way to prevent root as it keeps you from being able to switch to the root user. Without the ability to do that, all software exploits are worthless. And good luck exploiting the kernel itself.
Sent from my SGH-T999
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do they do this with a firmware upgrade? If so, would avoiding any OTA updates and only flashing Modded ROM's be a way to avoid it?
gaww said:
Do they do this with a firmware upgrade? If so, would avoiding any OTA updates and only flashing Modded ROM's be a way to avoid it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would assume yes.. and once youre rooted, you dont gotta worry about OTAs anyways....
OP suggested in another thread that this can be an issue if god forbid you need a replacement device..
I then stated that if we saved the backtostock file for the current firmware, this could possibly be avoided by flashing it through odin on a new device, but if samsung doesnt allow that by some means, were screwed
They're barring root at the kernel level on the i9500/i9505, but the difference with those models is that they have unlocked bootloaders and custom recovery with kernel source. It's possible to just install a custom recovery with ODIN and make a modified kernel (both of which are common practice in rooting anyway). They're just making it so that if you want to obtain root, you have to have physical access to the device to flash through ODIN, which is a lot safer in the long run. All this means is that Sally can't be exploited by running an APK or a malicious file to get root without her consent. (It also means that her "techy" boyfriend will have to understand ODIN to get root from now on,)
Are the phones shipping now locked?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
nitrogen618 said:
Are the phones shipping now locked?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The T-Mo S4 has an unlocked bootloader. This is much ado about nothing. Read the last few pages of the thread.
i think we are flipping out over nothing. this is probably just for government phones. I think samsung is smart enough to know the heat they will get if they implement this across the board.
Worse comes to worse, carriers start to implement this, and tmobile doesnt seem interested in doing anything of the sort. the verizon and at&t guys are the ones that should be worried then.
but like i said before. making a mountain out of a molehill
It's for security reasons. You will still be able to install a custom kernel and have root. One minute people complain about an exploit the next they complain about not being secure.. it really isnt a big deal. Well I'm not a dev so I can't really say it's not a big deal but it is what it is and you'll still be able to have root.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app
Mr. bird said:
I'm not a dev so I can't really say it's not a big deal
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am, I can, and I did. Truly nothing to see here folks. Mr. bird here read the thread and gets it right.
s4 is the best
For rooting purpose, not S4 but Sony Z1.
Send from my C6903 using TapatalkPro
my device: Sony Z1C6903
Samsung I9506
xxhorseriderxxx said:
They're barring root at the kernel level on the i9500/i9505, but the difference with those models is that they have unlocked bootloaders and custom recovery with kernel source. It's possible to just install a custom recovery with ODIN and make a modified kernel (both of which are common practice in rooting anyway). They're just making it so that if you want to obtain root, you have to have physical access to the device to flash through ODIN, which is a lot safer in the long run. All this means is that Sally can't be exploited by running an APK or a malicious file to get root without her consent. (It also means that her "techy" boyfriend will have to understand ODIN to get root from now on,)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Come on now. How tech savvy does one have to be to use ODIN. Honestly, my MyTouch 3G was more difficult to root than this thing with ODIN. Point, click, profit. I'm sure all those "techy" boyfriends will be rooting Sammy phones just as easily as they do now. At some point someone will figure out a one click solution anyway.
I agree 100% though, this really is nothing to worry about. I welcome it honestly. Its a great bump for security. Given the current state of things with the NSA and whatever else trying to siphon data like damn vampires and hack everything in sight like Jason. Though I'd say this is more for businesses, we need all we can get. As it sits, we're about as bad off as Windows 95 would be on today's internet surfing warez sites.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app
Odin Is pretty easy. I'm not that tech savvy with phones but when I had to use Odin I caught on quick.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
its a better discussion for all.....Samsung is locking out root at the kernel level
This is the first time I've seen this implemented on the kernel level. It is by far the most effective way
to prevent root as it keeps you from being able to switch to the root user. Without the ability to do that,
all software exploits are worthless. And good luck exploiting the kernel itself.
This is worrisome stuff - it may not affect those of you with a device right now but if it ends up being enacted
across the board, you better hope that you never break it.

What the google s4 means for us?

Will the release of this device mean that the the "samsung" s4 will be able to get official google updates without having to wait on samsung (provided that you root the phone and install the google factory image)?:highfive:
It'll be a good thing, but the tmobile s4 is hands down the "it phone" in America-town already. Just wait til a few more devs get the phone
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app
goft20 said:
Will the release of this device mean that the the "samsung" s4 will be able to get official google updates without having to wait on samsung (provided that you root the phone and install the google factory image)?:highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No after reading a few posts the updates will be sent to Samsung and they will have a time frame to release it for the google version.
Wayne Tech Nexus
Since they will have identical hardware, the G.E. rom can be dumped and turned into a custom rom with ease I assume. S4 will have 100% stable TouchWiz and AOSP (so to speak). I'm speculating as I haven't looked too much into this though.
Would WiFi Calling work if this were to happen?
Idkwts said:
Would WiFi Calling work if this were to happen?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No Wi-fi calling wont work on a AOSP based rom.
zelendel said:
No Wi-fi calling wont work on a AOSP based rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh okay, thanks. Guess I can't flash any AOSP roms until I move.
zelendel said:
No Wi-fi calling wont work on a AOSP based rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so what, I take it they interlace wifi calling in with Sense, TouchWiz, LG UI, Motoblur, etc?
adventure_of_link said:
so what, I take it they interlace wifi calling in with Sense, TouchWiz, LG UI, Motoblur, etc?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is a closed sourced feature. So it won't make it into any open source OS version.
Wayne Tech Nexus
Android_Monsters said:
It'll be a good thing, but the tmobile s4 is hands down the "it phone" in America-town already. Just wait til a few more devs get the phone
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why??
Sent from my SPH-L300 using Tapatalk 2
I don't see what the big deal is. You xan get aosp roms on our phones right now. I never used touchwiz before owning this phone, but I do have to admit I like it. I flashed the few aosp roms floating around and immediately missed the features tw offers (remote control, air gestures, etc).
Ive come from all AOSP devices and I have to say it doesn't compliment the hardware on this phone imo.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda premium
I see pros and cons with the google s4. While it will be great that the device will be up to date with the latest android, the vanilla android won't be able to make use of all the hardware features the device has to offer. But a big con with google s4 is that it only comes with 16GB internal storage.
nbeebe24 said:
I don't see what the big deal is. You xan get aosp roms on our phones right now. I never used touchwiz before owning this phone, but I do have to admit I like it. I flashed the few aosp roms floating around and immediately missed the features tw offers (remote control, air gestures, etc).
Ive come from all AOSP devices and I have to say it doesn't compliment the hardware on this phone imo.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The obvious difference will be that everything will function properly.
There is ALWAYS something broke or not quite right with AOSP/CM Ports. Bluetooth, tethering, camera... you name it.
So...its obviously a little different than... "why not just flash CM or AOSP now!?"... Official Google support for the S4 is a HUGE deal.
This means nothing for me. I'm not about to pay for a device that I can do the same thing with my already owned sgs4. Flash an aosp rom. But maybe it's more than that I would assume
---------- Post added at 08:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:36 PM ----------
jrccomputer said:
Why??
Sent from my SPH-L300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hoggles said:
The obvious difference will be that everything will function properly.
There is ALWAYS something broke or not quite right with AOSP/CM Ports. Bluetooth, tethering, camera... you name it.
So...its obviously a little different than... "why not just flash CM or AOSP now!?"... Official Google support for the S4 is a HUGE deal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HTML:
Whose to say this device something won't be broken. And it's quite obvious stuff will be broken but that's okay with me for any rom. I know I can expect a fix a lot faster.
For me, it's an overpriced and enlarged Nexus 4.
It lacks all the Samsung features (I know some people don't like that). It only has the vanilla Android on it which will have the same features as the Nexus 4.
Why do I need to pay $649.99 for the phone which has the same features as the one that only cost $299.99 (Nexus 4)? I know S4 is bigger, faster, blah blah blah but it's $350 different.
On the other hand, with AOSP rom available, for sure we will have better 3rd party ROM such as CM, AOKP, etc. I am actually happy to see that.
P.S. I am just sharing my opinion. No offense. =]
macaumen said:
For me, it's an overpriced and enlarged Nexus 4.
It lacks all the Samsung features (I know some people don't like that). It only has the vanilla Android on it which will have the same features as the Nexus 4.
Why do I need to pay $649.99 for the phone which has the same features as the one that only cost $299.99 (Nexus 4)? I know S4 is bigger, faster, blah blah blah but it's $350 different.
On the other hand, with AOSP rom available, for sure we will have better 3rd party ROM such as CM, AOKP, etc. I am actually happy to see that.
P.S. I am just sharing my opinion. No offense. =]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im thinking its because they know that devs will make it possible to odin stock touchwiz to the nexus s4 and activate the sensors which is one of the big highlights of the phone.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
krew760 said:
Im thinking its because they know that devs will make it possible to odin stock touchwiz to the nexus s4 and activate the sensors which is one of the big highlights of the phone.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you're saying people are going to buy the nexus S4 just to flash to stock tw? Makes sense
Sent from Flip's Galaxy S4
No more like samsung is trying to protect their investment. Imagine if they sold at the price of a nexus and you could odin stock rom. People would be saving 300+ bucks while others paid 640 and up. Its just a matter of being fair.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
krew760 said:
No more like samsung is trying to protect their investment. Imagine if they sold at the price of a nexus and you could odin stock rom. People would be saving 300+ bucks while others paid 640 and up. Its just a matter of being fair.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh ok, now that makes sense.
Sent from Flip's Galaxy S4
Hoggles said:
The obvious difference will be that everything will function properly.
There is ALWAYS something broke or not quite right with AOSP/CM Ports. Bluetooth, tethering, camera... you name it.
So...its obviously a little different than... "why not just flash CM or AOSP now!?"... Official Google support for the S4 is a HUGE deal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The aosp roms I've used have all been very stable for the most part. Just because Google will be releasing it does not mean it'll be completely bug free. I just don't find it exciting if it's not utilizing all the new tech Samsung has added.
No one really knows what's in store, but losing the ir blaster and the other sensors' functionality seems like a step backwards imo. I've owned all the nexus devices and have flashed aosp ROMs on every phone I have owned. It just doesn't excite me on this S4.
I actually like touch wiz this time around (minus the cartoon ui and bloatware).
Sent from my SGH-M919 using xda premium

Note II - the 4.4.2 update - discussion thread

http://www.intomobile.com/2014/02/18/samsung-begins-rollout-android-44-kitkat-14-devices/
Aww man I cant wait im not sure if this thread has already been made but thank god they have not forgot about us. :victory:
Woohoo...Samsung finally gets around to publishing their own bloated take on something we've had for months.
If tw still look the same with nothing extra that's useful I won't Bother. I use to like Samsung but once you get to the top there's only one way to go. Hope I'm wrong and they give us something nice, if not I'll stay on stock Android.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Already have it with CM11.. minus all the bloatware too.
Xtraordinair said:
Already have it with CM11.. minus all the bloatware too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you give me the link for that thread?
TIA
na_tra said:
can you give me the link for that thread?
TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SPRINT GALAXY NOTE II ONLY:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2524130
The good thing about this will be the new customization with all the KK ROM's we do have available once the developers get the KK source from the official release right?, most of them are pretty stock without as many options as my PACman 4.3.1 JB ROM has right now.
Wonder if I'll still get the ota if Knox is removed from otherwise stock 4.3 setup.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
The official kit kat tw Rom actually isn't coming with much bloat at all.. and Samsung has revamped tw to be more streamlined. I'm actually looking forward to it since I use the spen alot and upgrading to a Note 3 is really a waste of money.. I can wait for the Note 4
-End Transmission NERV HQ-
johndillinger1932 said:
The official kit kat tw Rom actually isn't coming with much bloat at all.. and Samsung has revamped tw to be more streamlined. I'm actually looking forward to it since I use the spen alot and upgrading to a Note 3 is really a waste of money.. I can wait for the Note 4
-End Transmission NERV HQ-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you uninstall all the utterly useless Samsung apps? Does the OS image weigh any less than 1GB? If not they may have made it run better, but they didn't debloat it.
And I *highly* doubt that Samsung got rid of their own useless apps they spent money developing.
Hopefully Google comes out with a phablet form device. Then I'm done with Samsung. Might go to an LG next. Screw Knox and Samsung.
Skripka said:
Can you uninstall all the utterly useless Samsung apps? Does the OS image weigh any less than 1GB? If not they may have made it run better, but they didn't debloat it.
And I *highly* doubt that Samsung got rid of their own useless apps they spent money developing.
Hopefully Google comes out with a phablet form device. Then I'm done with Samsung. Might go to an LG next. Screw Knox and Samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have had only a few android devices (kyocera zio, og evo, evo 3d, note 2, and kyocera torque) and samsung has been the easiest to work with. As far as knox is concerned (on note 2) it is nothing to worry about. The first day 4.3 was out we (me and lorjay) already had knox nullified and on day 2 root was working. While the same may not be true with new samsung devices. Point is knox means nothing to xda users/devs since there will always be a way around it.
4.4 on the note 3 looks okay and should be a better upgrade than 4.3 although we will have to wait and see. For myself i like aosp better since i found most of the things i like from samsung in 3rd party apps. Only thing I miss and can't get is a feature from note 3 mods (air command).
Sent from my SPH-L900 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
You've always been able to uninstall bloat.. it's one of the main reasons for having Titanium Backup. And a simple Google search will confirm my above statement. It's still gonna have bloat, just not nearly as much.
end transmission NERV HQ
johndillinger1932 said:
You've always been able to uninstall bloat.. it's one of the main reasons for having Titanium Backup. And a simple Google search will confirm my above statement. It's still gonna have bloat, just not nearly as much.
end transmission NERV HQ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Always...so long as you are rooted...
Skripka said:
Always...so long as you are rooted...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, but who would even be on XDA if they weren't rooting...
end transmission NERV HQ
Anyone heard any updates about our release yet? I keep seeing it for so many other phones.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Should be ready by the end of 2015
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk
johndillinger1932 said:
The official kit kat tw Rom actually isn't coming with much bloat at all.. and Samsung has revamped tw to be more streamlined. I'm actually looking forward to it since I use the spen alot and upgrading to a Note 3 is really a waste of money.. I can wait for the Note 4
-End Transmission NERV HQ-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm excited to see what it's like if this is indeed the case.
sliverr7x said:
Should be ready by the end of 2015
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By then i'm pretty sure most of us will have upgraded to a new phone but for those who keep their phones for 2+ years it will be nice to not be left out of KK update. Who knows I might keep my Note 2 for a while longer... I have no problems with it and it works just fine and does everything I need and then some.
I guess we either going to get 4.4 in April or May
http://www.ibtimes.com/android-44-k...axy-note-2-galaxy-s3-rollout-surfaces-1561321
Tha_Dynasty2049 said:
I guess we either going to get 4.4 in April or May
http://www.ibtimes.com/android-44-k...axy-note-2-galaxy-s3-rollout-surfaces-1561321
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably on the later side. US carriers never update to the "latest" version of Android...Google always gets another release out before carriers choose to finally re-write their ROMs to get up-to-date.

Why is the development on this phone so slow

I'm just confused why. Did we lose some assist or did Samsung beef up there security?
xEVILFREDx said:
I'm just confused why. Did we lose some assist or did Samsung beef up there security?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Beefed up security that bricks the phone, devs are having trouble getting past it.
if it ever gets sorted out maybe will see some development.
Pp.
It isn't about security, it's all about Exynos and the fact we have zero source code for it because Samsung won't hand it over for obvious reasons, without that source code it's relatively difficult to build roms. Some devs have done it but with the cost of it being painstakingly time consuming and with the resulting Roms being still buggy and relatively unstable. Which brings me to the assumption that because the s5 had development or other Samsung devices had good development you assumed this one would follow suit however most of Samsungs previous devices were using Qualcomms Snapdragon processors which Qualcomms been known to be good with supplying it's source code.
Critical Detox said:
It isn't about security, it's all about Exynos and the fact we have zero source code for it because Samsung won't hand it over for obvious reasons, without that source code it's relatively difficult to build roms. Some devs have done it but with the cost of it being painstakingly time consuming and with the resulting Roms being still buggy and relatively unstable. Which brings me to the assumption that because the s5 had development or other Samsung devices had good development you assumed this one would follow suit however most of Samsungs previous devices were using Qualcomms Snapdragon processors which Qualcomms been known to be good with supplying it's source code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fudge... this phone is feeling super slow without customer kernels and overclockin. I moved over back to android ditchin the 6 in hopes of rooting and going all sorts of crazy. Plus the multitasking is a joke in that it kills apps so fast
Im running the 5.1 OF8 leak with unikernel and my **** working fast
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk
raw2000j said:
Im running the 5.1 OF8 leak with unikernel and my **** working fast
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I though unikernel broke audio call?
raundown said:
In any case you should be bringing the keyboard back to BestBuy. Can't believe you would use a salesman's words as reliable source tho.
Sent from my SM-P905 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ntborg said:
Guess that's why Apple has a reputation of just working.. Now I know why Samsung sales are slipping. I was told hope you didn't listen to the salesman, really? Does your elders listen to salesman when looking for a gift? Since Samsung is aware of it how hard it it to put a banner before the upgrade warning the new user? Now back to Apple there products work, sounds like a hit a forum that thinks bugs and bad QA is fine.. Keep your wallets open sheep, samsung loves you.
Sent from my SM-N900V using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ballu84 said:
I though unikernel broke audio call?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whats the audio call? If u mean i cant hear or talk on phone i can do both with no problems.im using v5 002 v4 made mine lag.are you on the g925t because I am I seen somewhere a zip for audio call but I believe unikernel has it already.
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk
raw2000j said:
Whats the audio call? If u mean i cant hear or talk on phone i can do both with no problems.im using v5 002 v4 made mine lag.are you on the g925t because I am I seen somewhere a zip for audio call but I believe unikernel has it already.
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do I install the of8? I'm bone stock
ballu84 said:
How do I install the of8? I'm bone stock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Follow these instructions to install 0F6
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3135500
Then follow these instructions to install 0F8 update
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3145990
And then install unikernel,stock didnt work for me http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...d-development/kernel-stockmod-kernel-t3100395
Make sure you install OF6 first then OF8 instructions are there do in order I placed.Unikernel has root built in.
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk
raw2000j said:
Follow these instructions to install 0F6
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3135500
Then follow these instructions to install 0F8 update
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3145990
And then install unikernel,stock didnt work for me http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...d-development/kernel-stockmod-kernel-t3100395
Make sure you install OF6 first then OF8 instructions are there do in order I placed.Unikernel has root built in.
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks a lot...but i don't see any instructions there...i'm on 5.1.1 stock through ota at the moment so that's of6 i belive.
ballu84 said:
thanks a lot...but i don't see any instructions there...i'm on 5.1.1 stock through ota at the moment so that's of6 i belive.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok cool so diregard first one just do the update 0F8 and then unikernel dont forget to get twrp recovery if you want that
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk
raw2000j said:
Ok cool so diregard first one just do the update 0F8 and then unikernel dont forget to get twrp recovery if you want that
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, i found instructions on how to upgrade with odin..will this trip knox?
ballu84 said:
ok, i found instructions on how to upgrade with odin..will this trip knox?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you put unikernel yes if you flash stock no but i couldnt boot with stock kernel so i went with unikernel and you have to flash a kernel before you reboot or it wont boot up.I had twrp so i flashed right after i flashed the rom
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk
raw2000j said:
Im running the 5.1 OF8 leak with unikernel and my **** working fast
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same here with my husband and i
lrmdaddy said:
same here with my husband and i
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep way better
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk
Is there still an issue with the fingerprint reader?
gunslingerfry said:
Is there still an issue with the fingerprint reader?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup

Note 5 AT&T marshmallow release update confirmed!

Guys I got the release update information!! According to an AT&T rep the release date is.......... MID July! I know so exciting right??
We've already established the AT&T reps don't know wth they are talking about..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using XDA-Developers mobile app
Another thread for the same sh1t?
Well there's nothing else to discuss except make fun of the reps who are lying to us. No root, no roms, no anything
austinalexan said:
Well there's nothing else to discuss except make fun of the reps who are lying to us. No root, no roms, no anything
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he is referring to the fact there is already a thread for jokes.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
ToxicDev said:
I think he is referring to the fact there is already a thread for jokes.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who cares how many threads there are in this forum? It's not like there is much to do with this device that XDA can even be helpful with.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using XDA-Developers mobile app
whmgreen said:
Who cares how many threads there are in this forum? It's not like there is much to do with this device that XDA can even be helpful with.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At least root is making progress
Sooo miss my Nexus. Will now only purchase Nexus. Sick of being held hostage by ATT and Sammy. Att mostly. Hate iPhones (iOS) but at least Apple doesn't let carriers take advantage of them or their customers.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using XDA-Developers mobile app
Nexus
android.gt said:
Sooo miss my Nexus. Will now only purchase Nexus. Sick of being held hostage by ATT and Sammy. Att mostly. Hate iPhones (iOS) but at least Apple doesn't let carriers take advantage of them or their customers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hear you android.gt, it's ridiculous that we have to wait months for Samsung/ATT to deliver a simple update. Not to mention all the bloatware that comes with these ATT phones.
darktrancer said:
I hear you android.gt, it's ridiculous that we have to wait months for Samsung/ATT to deliver a simple update. Not to mention all the bloatware that comes with these ATT phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It has nothing to do Samsung. Get that part straight as Samsung has released the MM version to all carriers. It's up to the carriers to release their bloated version.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using XDA-Developers mobile app
It will be early June
bogdi1988 said:
It will be early June
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You were able to confirm?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
Wonder if I'm the only one avoiding the side load method because I don't want to lose everything.
austinalexan said:
Wonder if I'm the only one avoiding the side load method because I don't want to lose everything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No U not lol
jake1702 said:
You were able to confirm?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's just say - early June
austinalexan said:
Wonder if I'm the only one avoiding the side load method because I don't want to lose everything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did it, made a smart switch backup, update via side load, restore backup. There was some re doing of a lot of stuff but I'm running MM.
Honestly, in my opinion MM is better in every regards. I miss weather on the lockscreen and the lock screen swipe effects, but those are a small price to pay for the battery life and performance improvements
Russ77 said:
I did it, made a smart switch backup, update via side load, restore backup. There was some re doing of a lot of stuff but I'm running MM.
Honestly, in my opinion MM is better in every regards. I miss weather on the lockscreen and the lock screen swipe effects, but those are a small price to pay for the battery life and performance improvements
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
amen
Russ77 said:
I did it, made a smart switch backup, update via side load, restore backup. There was some re doing of a lot of stuff but I'm running MM.
Honestly, in my opinion MM is better in every regards. I miss weather on the lockscreen and the lock screen swipe effects, but those are a small price to pay for the battery life and performance improvements
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually got so impatient that I did a smartswitch backup on the computer and sideloaded marshmallow then restored from the backup. It couldn't have gone smoother.
What is a side load? Sorry guys. New to this.
Paradog79 said:
What is a side load? Sorry guys. New to this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Installing an update via the recovery menu on the phone, and using ADB on a desktop computer with the phone connected to it.

Categories

Resources