Develop Bugs

[Q] Whats Your A100 & A500 Benchmark Score?

After rooting, unlocking bootloader, flashing Flex http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1589034 my score is 2729. Runs real nice now.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Here is mine with flexreapers with his a100 tweaked kernal (so i can control the cpu max feq for power saving)
Only setting out of the ordinary i have enabled is Force GPU rendering (just experimenting with things to see how well it all works0
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

very nice, what app are u using to tweak the cpu? if you wouldnt mind posting what runs smoothest with no crash. basically a limit threshold. with crossix sd mod i only got up to 2744

I got up to 2830 using set cpu and performance governor with flex rf1. On my usual interactive it got a hair lower, 2790-2800 over 4 runs. Overall I seem to pull about 2750 averaged out. Rf1 isn't any faster then my 3.1 but I was already using the kernel in rf1 ( i think anyways, it was the second kernel he released for 3.1) on it, which did boost the score up about 300 points.
Edit: my bad I used antutu cpu master not set CPU
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2

How do you turn on force GPU? No option like that in the menus. And does it cause any problems?

Its under developer towards the bottom of user interface. None that I've noticed so far, but I've only had it enabled for about 3 hours of use.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2

That's mine.
Send from my A100

core control, system tuner, setcpu, no frills.. none working

Hi,
The title says it all.. they are not working.. I am using ARHD with stock kernel.. each of them reset the values to default on waking up, reboot, or randomly, or an app pushes the on demand limit..
What I want to do is to limit the clocks to 640 ( or 10000 at least) on daily use..

_delice_doluca_ said:
Hi,
The title says it all.. they are not working.. I am using ARHD with stock kernel.. each of them reset the values to default on waking up, reboot, or randomly, or an app pushes the on demand limit..
What I want to do is to limit the clocks to 640 ( or 10000 at least) on daily use..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a known issue with Tegra 3. At some low level, those values are governed by the CPU. Whatever you set them to, doesn't stick. Only governor and IO Scheduler sticks.
However, this doesn't mean that your CPUs work at the maximum possible frequency all the time. The Tegra architecture manages the CPU frequencies and you see a distribution of times at different frequencies.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
.
EDIT: There is one thing you can do. Using SetCPU, under Advanced tab, you will see Powersave Bias (0-1000). Set to 0 on mine. If you set it to 400, your CPU will never go above 1000-1100 depending on how many CPUs are online. I am not sure if this will stick though. If you test it, let us know.

NFS-MW fps drop and a noticeable drop in performance

I recently installed "Need for Speed : Most Wanted" on my Xperia Ion . The first 1-2 mins are fine then the game becomes laggy and so unplayable.
After I close the game the cpu doesn't go higher clock than 810mhz (even while benchmarking) which causes a huge drop in performance and the device becomes a little bit slow.
My phone is not rooted so I can't change governer any idea ?
ScreenShots:
Before : After
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

The board has an auto downlocking feature that turns the clock down to 810 Mhz when it heats too much. Safety vault, so the chip doesn't burn.

Felimenta97 said:
The board has an auto downlocking feature that turns the clock down to 810 Mhz when it heats too much. Safety vault, so the chip doesn't burn.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, That explains alot . btw I saw nfs most wanted on adreno 205 it was way better then on my adreno 220 why ?

justsayin' said:
Well, That explains alot . btw I saw nfs most wanted on adreno 205 it was way better then on my adreno 220 why ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because the system might be less loaded, or less RAM used. Dunno. In JB on S it runs almost without any problem
Sent from my LT26i using Tapatalk HD

Felimenta97 said:
Because the system might be less loaded, or less RAM used. Dunno. In JB on S it runs almost without any problem
Sent from my LT26i using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks alot .guess I'll just wait for JB update

Unbelievable Score !!! Is this possible on our Z2?

https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/7018273
Please check this score and tell me is this really possible?
Then clearly Our 820 is equivalent to an 835.

Shinichi Kudo said:
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/7018273
Please check this score and tell me is this really possible?
Then clearly Our 820 is equivalent to an 835.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
which android oreo gave these results ?

The single core is even higher than 845, I highly doubt it is real or the test was done while highly overclocked and inside a refrigerator which is not practical for daily use.

Hey i got 212225 score
In antutu new version
ROM :AEX 5.4
KERNEL:A R BEAST
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

rehankumar said:
The single core is even higher than 845, I highly doubt it is real or the test was done while highly overclocked and inside a refrigerator which is not practical for daily use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even overclocking wouldn't produce that result..... that's a completely different cpu... probably a Desktop CPU.

Ru1718 said:
Hey i got 212225 score
In antutu new version
ROM :AEX 5.3
KERNEL:A R BEAST
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL
If true please present a screenshot.

Guys even the second highest score is baffling. A multicore of 5k.
And isn't the cheapest desktop CPU supposed to give higher scores than that.

S9 (Snapdragon) Thermal Throttling behaviour...

Howdy...
I've been wondering how the Samsung S9 with Snapdragon behaves when throttling.
it's very easy to test... just run this app called CPU throttling Test and take a look at Temperature, Clock and Performance.
This is a Screenshot from my Sony Xperia XZ2:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
You can clearly see the Temperature reaching a critical point and the Performance dropping, while Frequency stays at the same 2.8ghz.
Here we have a OP 6 which does show the same behaviour... no Frequency Limit!
Looking at the SD835 Essential Phone:
or the even older SD820 HTC 10:
We do see a CPU Frequency Limit on both devices.
So... is this Max Frequency yet still reduced Performance a Snapdragon 845 thingy?
Simply do the Test for 2-5 minutes (until throttling becomes obvious) and we will know.
P.S going to Options and chaging Threads from 20 to 7 might totally change the behaviour of this test!
P.P.S Go into Options and correctly set Thermal Zones! If you don't know which nr is what... Terminal / ADB shell "for file in sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone*/type; do echo "$file"; cat "$file"; done"
Greetings,
Haldi

Somebody made a video with 3 SD 845 phones, but he got higher performance, did you change number of threads from default 20 and where phones cold when you begin testing?
I can't post a link, just search "OnePlus 6 vs Sony XZ2 vs Xiaomi Black Shark" on youtube.