I googled IPv6 and WP7 and found that mango is suppose to offer this to WP7.
My Nokia Lumia 800 however is blissfully ignorant when it comes to IPv6, it simply doesn't get an address and is therefore unable to connect to any IPv6 host.
Now I don't have any other handsets, so I cannot determine if this is a Nokia special, or that Mango doesn't offer any IPv6 support, contrary to the articles that claim it does offer IPv6 support.
Can anyone chime in here ?
Does your Lumia receive an IPv6 assigned by your carrier? I guess if your carrier dosn't assign IPv6 adresses you can do nothing about this...
I have IPv6 configured on my local network and I can confirm that Lumia actually gets an IPv6 address (public, routable one, not only link-local) and I can also ping it over IPv6.
It doesn't, however, seem to open any IPv6 web pages and all the pages with both v4 and v6 fallback to v4.
Hmm, how did you find out it got an IPv6 address ? Whireshark ?
As far as I know, there is no way of checking on the device itself, in any case, sites like test-ipv6 com report that the Lumia doesn't have any IPv6 address.
It is strange, as I have a dhcpv6 server for statefull configuration (mainly pc's) and I also have two IPv6 routers that advertise RA's to devices. My Nokia N82 and E72 and the IPAD2 all get global addresses and are happily surfing to IPv6 sites.
I presume you are on Mango or 7740 ?
I've first checked ARP table on my computer, found IPv4 of my phone and matched its MAC with a list of IPv6 neighbors (netsh -> interface ipv6 -> show neighbors).
And yes, it is Mango.
ChrisKringel said:
Does your Lumia receive an IPv6 assigned by your carrier? I guess if your carrier dosn't assign IPv6 adresses you can do nothing about this...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry should have mentioned, my home network is fully IPv6 enabled for about two years now. I run one native IPv6 connection, where I get a :/48 prefix. My main line (in speed) is a tunnel connection over Ipv4 with a different :/48 prefix from the tunnelbroker.
The setup is such, that my Servers all get a fixed IPv6 address in the first available :/64 and are routed over the tunnel. My Windows PC's get routed over the same tunnel using a DHCPv6 server, all other devices either go over one or the other, depending on which RA (route advertisement) gets to them first, as both IPv6 routers also advertise their routes (pc's are setup not to listen to ra's in any case).
This works fine for my two Symbian powered Nokia's, as well as for the IPAD2, they only device in my house who seems to be unaware of IPv6 is the Lumia.
sjaak327 said:
Hmm, how did you find out it got an IPv6 address ? Whireshark ?
As far as I know, there is no way of checking on the device itself, in any case, sites like test-ipv6 com report that the Lumia doesn't have any IPv6 address.
It is strange, as I have a dhcpv6 server for statefull configuration (mainly pc's) and I also have two IPv6 routers that advertise RA's to devices. My Nokia N82 and E72 and the IPAD2 all get global addresses and are happily surfing to IPv6 sites.
I presume you are on Mango or 7740 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are there websites that you use that are only accessible through IPv6?
http://test-ipv6.com tells me that I don't have access to IPv6 from work.
Your IPv4 address on the public Internet appears to be xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
No IPv6 address detected [more info]
You appear to be able to browse the IPv4 Internet only. You will not be able to reach IPv6-only sites.
Your DNS server (possibly run by your ISP) appears to have IPv6 Internet access
My iPhone through 3G on AT&T gives the same result, expect the last one, which says:
Your DNS server (possibly run by your ISP) appears to have no access to the IPv6 Internet, or is not configured to use it. This may in the future restrict your ability to reach IPv6-only sites.
This is not even using Wi-Fi. So, major carriers aren't even supporting IPv6 browsing yet. It's not iPhone specific. Just being on AT&T 3G in Minnesota means no IPv6.
I'd like to know of even 1 real site that this prevents you from accessing.
----
Just read your post above.
What problem are you experiencing on your network by the device not having an IPv6 address?
Why not also support IPv4 in your internal network?
It's pretty unlikely that you would need that many addresses internally.
Yes, IPv6 on 3G (cellular network in general) support is really limited and it is much harder for both operators and mobile phones to support it.
It would be, however, about time, that WP starts supporting IPv6 over wifi.
N37-L0RD said:
I've first checked ARP table on my computer, found IPv4 of my phone and matched its MAC with a list of IPv6 neighbors (netsh -> interface ipv6 -> show neighbors).
And yes, it is Mango.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, Using Netsh int ipv6 show neighbors, I see my server, a few other clients, the Ipad, but not the Lumia. If you go to test-ipv6.com, does it show the global unicast IPv6 address ?
If it matters:
OS: 7.10.7740.16
FW: 1600.2479.7740.11451
HW: 112.1402.2.3
JVH3 said:
Are there websites that you use that are only accessible through IPv6?
http://test-ipv6.com tells me that I don't have access to IPv6 from work.
Your IPv4 address on the public Internet appears to be xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
No IPv6 address detected [more info]
You appear to be able to browse the IPv4 Internet only. You will not be able to reach IPv6-only sites.
Your DNS server (possibly run by your ISP) appears to have IPv6 Internet access
My iPhone through 3G on AT&T gives the same result, expect the last one, which says:
Your DNS server (possibly run by your ISP) appears to have no access to the IPv6 Internet, or is not configured to use it. This may in the future restrict your ability to reach IPv6-only sites.
This is not even using Wi-Fi. So, major carriers aren't even supporting IPv6 browsing yet. It's not iPhone specific. Just being on AT&T 3G in Minnesota means no IPv6.
I'd like to know of even 1 real site that this prevents you from accessing.
----
Just read your post above.
What problem are you experiencing on your network by the device not having an IPv6 address?
Why not also support IPv4 in your internal network?
It's pretty unlikely that you would need that many addresses internally.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do support IPv4 on my internal network as well, that is not the point. It is 2012, all my devices run dual stack, and I think it is time that a Nokia released in November 2011 should also be able to handle dual stack and connect using either IPv4 or IPv6, I mean come on, even a Nokia N82 which is over three years old can do it !
And yes, if I go with a pc, or the ipad or the N82 to that Ipv6 test site, they all report a global IPv6 address and pass with flying colors, the Lumia only has a IPv4 address.
Oh and to make myself clear, (if it isn't obvious from previous posts) I am not talking about 3g, I am talking about my home network over wifi.
sjaak327 said:
I do support IPv4 on my internal network as well, that is not the point. It is 2012, all my devices run dual stack, and I think it is time that a Nokia released in November 2011 should also be able to handle dual stack and connect using either IPv4 or IPv6, I mean come on, even a Nokia N82 which is over three years old can do it !
And yes, if I go with a pc, or the ipad or the N82 to that Ipv6 test site, they all report a global IPv6 address and pass with flying colors, the Lumia only has a IPv4 address.
Oh and to make myself clear, (if it isn't obvious from previous posts) I am not talking about 3g, I am talking about my home network over wifi.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understood that you were talking about your local network with WiFi. I only mentioned the 3G, to show that the carriers are not yet even giving access to IPv6 only Internet sites.
Is the reason you need this to get to IPv6 only internet sites from home?
Or do you restrict access to some machines on your network to machines with IPv6 addresses for the security advantages?
Or is the reason strictly because the number of IP address under IPv4 is running out and at some point new sites will be forced into being IPv6 only? At that point the phone will not be able to access the new sites.
I don't see a reason for Nokia not supporting IPv6. It's been around for a long time. We've know it was needed for a long time.
The only thing I can think is that most phones are only used for about 2 years and you aren't going to see alot, if any, major sites switching to IPv6 only in that period of time. Realistically all major sites will support IPv4 for at least 5 years or longer.
Yes, Nokia should support it. But, phones not supporting it today are not going to cause typical users any problems.
JVH3 said:
I understood that you were talking about your local network with WiFi. I only mentioned the 3G, to show that the carriers are not yet even giving access to IPv6 only Internet sites.
Is the reason you need this to get to IPv6 only internet sites from home?
Or do you restrict access to some machines on your network to machines with IPv6 addresses for the security advantages?
Or is the reason strictly because the number of IP address under IPv4 is running out and at some point new sites will be forced into being IPv6 only? At that point the phone will not be able to access the new sites.
I don't see a reason for Nokia not supporting IPv6. It's been around for a long time. We've know it was needed for a long time.
The only thing I can think is that most phones are only used for about 2 years and you aren't going to see alot, if any, major sites switching to IPv6 only in that period of time. Realistically all major sites will support IPv4 for at least 5 years or longer.
Yes, Nokia should support it. But, phones not supporting it today are not going to cause typical users any problems.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All you say is true, yes there is no problem now, the phone supports IPv4 just fine, however, since it is 2012, and since IPv6 is around for > 10 years, I am utterly disappointed by either WP or Nokia not fully supporting IPv6, and this should really be rectified asap,regardless of all the things you said. Not to mention the fact that in Asia things are quickly going to IPv6, simply because they did already run out of IPv4 addresses.
The sooner we get rid of IPv4 the better, the stack has run it course and is redundant.
sjaak327 said:
Hmm, Using Netsh int ipv6 show neighbors, I see my server, a few other clients, the Ipad, but not the Lumia. If you go to test-ipv6.com, does it show the global unicast IPv6 address ?
If it matters:
OS: 7.10.7740.16
FW: 1600.2479.7740.11451
HW: 112.1402.2.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, I made a big mistake by making false assumptions. It appears that the IPv6 enabled Nokia was actually Nokia E52 (I've only checked MAC vendor and forgot about the other phone having wireless enabled).
It seems Lumia doesn't get IPv6 after all.
Hello all,
I am new to the Android family and have just bought my first Android phone the AT&T Note 2. At home and about town in the states the phone is phenomenal, so far I am loving Android, except for the minor flaw of it not having global proxy permissions for all apps.
I am on a corporate network which uses a proxy with authentication, and also has some sites blocked of course, facebook, pandora, etc. I know that you probably tire of the endless comparisons of iphone to Android, but by setting up my iphone and hitting a proxy app I could use the facebook app, magic jack, pandora, or whatever.
I have rooted the Note 2 running JB 4.1.2, and have installed ProxyDroid and BusyBox. I assumed by putting in the settings of the proxy into ProxyDroid would connect it automatically. I have had some success some apps would work intermittently like skype and whatsapp, but the playstore and most of the other apps will not connect, and I have be changing settings without properly recording the working settings so much for good troubleshooting..... I can surf the web, under restrictions of course, with Opera Mobile because I entered the proxy info directly into the app.
Now to the meat of things:
The WiFi settings are as follows:
EAP: PEAP
PHASE 2: MSCHAPV2
No Certificates
Correct Identity
No Anonymous Identity
Correct Password
Proxy settings Manual
blahblahproxy800.corp.company.com
Proxy Port: 80
No Bypass
IP: DHCP
the security is 802.1x EAP
ProxyDroid Settings:
Host: blahblahproxy800.corp.company.com
Port: 80
Proxy type: HTTPS
Auto Connect ON
BOUND to network SSID
Authentication on
Correct User
Correct PW
NTLM Authentication ON
Domain: corp.company.com
Global Proxy ON
DNS Proxy ON
I know that rubbish up there is a lot of information, but I am a complete noob in the world of Android. I can give the settings that I have in the Iphone to connect if you need them, but if you have any experience with it you know that it is extremely easy to set up. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Is there something missing in my setup? Do I need to add anything else, app or settings wise? Or do I just have to accept it and leave my shiny new note as a paper weight until I go on days off, and use the Iphone while I am here?
Thank you all in advance for you help on this and the help that you unknowingly gave me while I was stalking / searching the boards getting info on how to root.
Cheers
I'm trying to run some network services (servers listening for incoming connections) on my LG G3 phone. Its rooted, though all the services that I want to run do not require root to function (they use unpriviliged ports).
Some network services work, while others do not. For example, Ice Cold Apps SSH server does not work, while droid VNC server does.
From what I'm able to see, services that bind to "0.0.0.0" as the listen IP address work fine and are accessible from everywhere (NAT not withstanding), while services that bind to ":::" (IPv6) are only available from the phone itself (I test using ConnectBot's "telnet" mode). Such a service will respond to the phone's IPv4 address - when called from a local app - but will not respond to incoming connections from other devices on the network.
I don't have an IPv6 network that I can access, so I'm not sure if the problem is only for IPv4 devices or for all access.
I didn't have this problem with my previous phone - a Galaxy S2 running TouchWiz 4.1.2 or Cyanogenmod 11.
From looking at the output of iptables, I see there are many firewall rules, but I didn't see anything that should actually block content. I can paste the output of iptables if you guys want to take a look.
Any help will be much appreciated.
guss77 said:
I'm trying to run some network services (servers listening for incoming connections) on my LG G3 phone. Its rooted, though all the services that I want to run do not require root to function (they use unpriviliged ports).
Some network services work, while others do not. For example, Ice Cold Apps SSH server does not work, while droid VNC server does.
From what I'm able to see, services that bind to "0.0.0.0" as the listen IP address work fine and are accessible from everywhere (NAT not withstanding), while services that bind to ":::" (IPv6) are only available from the phone itself (I test using ConnectBot's "telnet" mode). Such a service will respond to the phone's IPv4 address - when called from a local app - but will not respond to incoming connections from other devices on the network.
I don't have an IPv6 network that I can access, so I'm not sure if the problem is only for IPv4 devices or for all access.
I didn't have this problem with my previous phone - a Galaxy S2 running TouchWiz 4.1.2 or Cyanogenmod 11.
From looking at the output of iptables, I see there are many firewall rules, but I didn't see anything that should actually block content. I can paste the output of iptables if you guys want to take a look.
Any help will be much appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which G3 do you have? I have a T-Mobile version and have noticed that the phones do not have IPV4 support on mobile networks, they instead do 6to4 to get IPV4 for apps. This does not happen on WiFi though. I'm trying to figure out if the G3 defaults to IPV6 only and even WiFi IPV4 services might be secondary to IPV6, so any app on the phone that is IPV6 ready will bind to the IPV6 interface and not listen on IPV4 for incoming connections.
You could try disabling IPV6 globally to see if this solves your problem. Not sure how to do it though.
I have the international G3 (LG-D855). I don't think my mobile network is using IPv6 (not that advanced - the IPv6 for rmnet0 is a zeroconf address).
Also, the situation is only interesting on WiFi, and I don't have an IPv6 wifi - so all traffic coming in should be IPv4 by definition.