Develop Bugs

Quadrant results

What is
1) free Ram when you turn the device on
2) quadrant score?
I played with a phone from the store, I closed all apps and the phone felt slow to me
I appreciate your responses
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

234MB RAM available when booting up. Settles around 270MB if I kill junk w/ATK.
2140, after running it a few times in a row:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Stock speeds. I get to around 2700 on my 1.4GHz OC'ed TF101 (Tegra2, 1800 stock), and could hit ~2500 on my stock-speed G2X on occasion.
-bZj

I generally get between 2500 -3000 for quadrant.
Franco's Nightly#5 with Bigxie's rom.
I have about 293mbs of ram used after boot up. 402mbs of free ram.

420 free RAM, IML74K 4.0.3, stock kernel, 2320 pts first run.

rafarataneneces said:
What is
1) free Ram when you turn the device on
2) quadrant score?
I played with a phone from the store, I closed all apps and the phone felt slow to me
I appreciate your responses
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see you are coming from a Galaxy S 2 version.
I'll clear up a few thing for you:
nr. 1 : 4.0.1 lags, 4.0.3 is faster than anything else on the market. There is a huge difference. Check if the store phone has 4.0.1 on it.
nr. 2 : Quadrant is a meaningless benchmark, and you should use antutu or CF Bench instead.
There are no good 3D benchmarks that take advantage of the Galaxy Nexus hardware yet, but GLBench is your best bet when it comes to 3D benchmarks.
nr. 3: almost always more than 350mb free, multitasking is sick on this phone, no worries there.

[Q] Whats Your A100 & A500 Benchmark Score?

After rooting, unlocking bootloader, flashing Flex http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1589034 my score is 2729. Runs real nice now.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Here is mine with flexreapers with his a100 tweaked kernal (so i can control the cpu max feq for power saving)
Only setting out of the ordinary i have enabled is Force GPU rendering (just experimenting with things to see how well it all works0
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

very nice, what app are u using to tweak the cpu? if you wouldnt mind posting what runs smoothest with no crash. basically a limit threshold. with crossix sd mod i only got up to 2744

I got up to 2830 using set cpu and performance governor with flex rf1. On my usual interactive it got a hair lower, 2790-2800 over 4 runs. Overall I seem to pull about 2750 averaged out. Rf1 isn't any faster then my 3.1 but I was already using the kernel in rf1 ( i think anyways, it was the second kernel he released for 3.1) on it, which did boost the score up about 300 points.
Edit: my bad I used antutu cpu master not set CPU
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2

How do you turn on force GPU? No option like that in the menus. And does it cause any problems?

Its under developer towards the bottom of user interface. None that I've noticed so far, but I've only had it enabled for about 3 hours of use.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2

That's mine.
Send from my A100

Some useless GNex benchmarking scores compared.

Some useless benchmarks score for the Galaxy Nexus GSM.
All tests were made from a clean install of stock JB and Android Revolution HD. I used stock kernel, Glados and franco's latest nightly (r268/384mhz). Keep in mind that franco's kernel is clocked at a slightly higher frequency by default compared to Glados.
I used 4 benchmarking apps :
Benchmark & Tuning
Cf-Bench
Antutu
Quadrant
NUMBERS!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The point here is not telling you what's best or what. Keep in mind that there is a lot of inconsistencies in these results and that the user experience was great across the board regardless of the rom/kernel combination. Benchmarks have to be taken with a grain of salt, they don't really mean anything in terms of real world experience.

Battery life bench marks would be much more interesting
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

With my Galaxy Nexus running stock (Google Developers images) Jelly Bean I got roughly 4000 - 4500 points in Antutu. I'm surprised you got more than 6000.

PURE odin jelly bean:

With controls for CPU frequency, voltage, and (most important) temperature, the chart would be much more meaningful. In my experience, benchmarks are a better test of your air-conditioner than your phone.
My guess is that Antutu is more consistent than Quadrant because it heats your CPU up a lot more than Quadrant. That makes Quadrant results more dependent on environmental temperature.

Post here antutu benchmark scores

In this topic give out antutu benchmark results. In addition to the results give the name of the rom and the kernel.
Example :
Screenshot from antutu:
Rom:
Kernel:

Screenshot:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Rom: jellybro nightly
Kernel: Trinity alpha 11 1344-384
With this rom and kernel i don't have lags in games, and It's very good to daily use
Sorry for my bad English

ROM: XYLON 14-1 BETA
KERNEL:FRANCO R356
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Stock deodexed 4.2.1
Franco kernel 348 @ 1.5ghz cpu & 512mhz gpu
Feels smooth enough for me with minimal to no lag at all during gaming
P/s: its over 9000!
delivered by FedEx

Xenon HD
Air Kernel
236-1350 CPU 384 GPU
Really proud of the results but i got an issue, whenever i go over those frequencies, i get lower scores. I´ve seen it throttling on dmesg but gpu does not throttle and if i put gpu at 512 or whatever it is, i get like 68-7400. Anyone know why?
In either case im happy cuz this gives awsome battery life and 0 lag.:laugh:

Try this thread instead. Much more matured with way more results.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1443343

CyanogenMod
Franco Kernel

Paranoid Android
Fancy kernel, no OC

Not sure how to take a screen capture, but my score: 10312 (running Vanir 4.3 on toroplus)

NFS-MW fps drop and a noticeable drop in performance

I recently installed "Need for Speed : Most Wanted" on my Xperia Ion . The first 1-2 mins are fine then the game becomes laggy and so unplayable.
After I close the game the cpu doesn't go higher clock than 810mhz (even while benchmarking) which causes a huge drop in performance and the device becomes a little bit slow.
My phone is not rooted so I can't change governer any idea ?
ScreenShots:
Before : After
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

The board has an auto downlocking feature that turns the clock down to 810 Mhz when it heats too much. Safety vault, so the chip doesn't burn.

Felimenta97 said:
The board has an auto downlocking feature that turns the clock down to 810 Mhz when it heats too much. Safety vault, so the chip doesn't burn.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, That explains alot . btw I saw nfs most wanted on adreno 205 it was way better then on my adreno 220 why ?

justsayin' said:
Well, That explains alot . btw I saw nfs most wanted on adreno 205 it was way better then on my adreno 220 why ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because the system might be less loaded, or less RAM used. Dunno. In JB on S it runs almost without any problem
Sent from my LT26i using Tapatalk HD

Felimenta97 said:
Because the system might be less loaded, or less RAM used. Dunno. In JB on S it runs almost without any problem
Sent from my LT26i using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks alot .guess I'll just wait for JB update