I believe it's possible to mod the Note 3 camera.apk or use Focal to record at 4096x2160 which is 4k, what they advertise is Quad HD but they say it's 4k but It's not the case.
tichs said:
I believe it's possible to mod the Note 3 camera.apk or use Focal to record at 4096x2160 which is 4k, what they advertise is Quad HD but they say it's 4k but It's not the case.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ultra HD 4K is defined as 3840 × 2160, which is what the Note 3 records at. You're referring to Digital Cinema 4K, which is what's shown at movie theaters. 3840 x 2160 is still 4x the pixels of 1080p, which is what 4k means anyway.
Related
What resolution is the TV connected to your Fire TV running at?
720p
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
720p
1080 but I had to scale it a bit because the edges were getting cropped.
I use it on a 1080p tv, but have also a 720p television. I think that 720p should be more compatible that 1080p.
Sc0rp10 said:
1080 but I had to scale it a bit because the edges were getting cropped.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's normal with tv's.
1080, works awesome.
1080p,had to scale it a bit,like Sc0rp10 did.
1080, only because it's a challenge to find a good 720 at 40+ inches - once I set the fire tv up, I looked and realized that the time for new large sets at 720 looks as if it ended in a war of pixel counts five years or so back.
Thanks everyone. Looks like some people are still on 720p. I'll try to support both.
Since we can only vote once I have a 1080 and 720. I have an awesome older 720 JVC DLP that I plan to use until it melts because of the awesome picture.
1080 also had to scale.
Found out on my box it's got big bold 42" screen size on it, then in smaller print below it, it says "41.9 actual size"
1080p
Hello guys,
help me to sort something out.
I made a UHD video and FHD video. Both fps are 30. My PC monitor is 1920x1080.
How can it be, that UHD video quality is much much better then FHD? I say so, because my monitor is with FHD resolution (so it cannot reproduce UHD fully) and frame rate is 30 on both videos, so the quality should be the same, right?
Or I do understand something wrong here ?
Thanks!
An UHD downscaled to FHD video will probably appear sharper than a native FHD video when being displayed on an FHD monitor.
That's not very strange, imho.
Because FULL HD has only 17Mbps bitrate whereas 4K in Marshmallow has 46Mpbs, in Lollipop 30Mpbs.
hi, i found a deal on an s9 and wanted to know if the phone records 1080p 60fps video with stabilization enabled coz my current mate 9 doesn't and lately i record a lot of videos and at 30 fps the videos isn't up to my taste
Video stabilization isn't available in UHD (60 fps) and 1:1 resolutions. It is available in FHD (60 fps). UHD being 3840x2160 and FHD being 1920x1080.
Tel864 said:
Video stabilization isn't available in UHD (60 fps) and 1:1 resolutions. It is available in FHD (60 fps). UHD being 3840x2160 and FHD being 1920x1080.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you
Sent from my MHA-L29 using Tapatalk
Today I was trying Redmi Note 8 Pro (Global Edition) in the electronic shop, and since I'm planning to shot a lot of video with the device so I tried recording video at different resolutions and frame rates to look at the file size. Following is what I found out:
1. 4K 30fps h.264: 380MB / Minute
2. 4K 30fps h.265: 290MB / Minute
3. 1080p 60fps h.264: 152MB / Minute
4. 1080p 60fps h.265: 117MB / Minute
5. 1080p 30fps h.264: 153MB / Minute
6. 1080p 30fps h.265: 117MB / Minute
Results 1 & 2 seems fine and within the expected. result 3 came way less than I expected for 60fps video, but the shock was when results 5 & 6 came! how come both are the exact same size even the first is double number of frames! I'm used to the size of 150MB / Minute when record with my older Android phone at 1080p 30fps h.264 so that make results 5 & 6 acceptable. But what is wrong with 3 & 4!? there is something fundamentally wrong here. By the way how come iPhone can record 1080p 60fps and produce only 90MB / Minute, and on the other hand my future phone record same video using the same codec 2.265 for 117 MB /minute!? is Apple able rely more on it's powerful cpu to produce compress the video at real-time. Also I've noticed that 1080p 60fps recorded bt Redmi Note 8 Pro isn't as smooth as iPhone or Galaxy during play back!!!!
Its a budget phone. 60fps is working fine for me.
This phone is far cheaper compared to iPhone
Indeed it must not be compared to iPhone as a complete package, but 60fps still 60fps regardless which device record it. 1080p 60fps from galaxy 10 is as smooth as iPhone but both still far smoother than Redmi Note 8 Pro! I'm really suspicious about how Xiaomi is handling these files, if feel it's more or less 30fps with some tweaks. I'll get my hands on my phone in few days and I'll analyze 1080p 60fps more carefully even if it's required to go frame by frame.
I've just checked the following mobiles for 1080p 60fps and 30fps h.265:
Honor 9X
1080p 60fps H. 265: 160MB
1080p 30fps H. 265: 90MB
Samsung A70
1080p 60fps H. 265: 116MB
1080p 30fps H. 265: 74MB
iPhone XR
1080p 60fps H. 265: 90MB
1080p 30fps H. 265: 60MB
Mi 8
1080p 60fps H. 265: 119MB
1080p 30fps H. 265: 118MB
Mi 9T
1080p 60fps H. 265: 118MB
1080p 30fps H. 265: 102MB
It's clear now that 60fps in Note 8 pro is ok comparing to other phones, but seems the compression isn't working right in 30fps since 30fps and 60fps are the same size. 30fps must be around 80MB not 117MB. Anyone have explanation for this phenomena?
Hey everyone, I noticed this while zooming using the 4K vs the 1080p quality (30fps both, 60fps setting both are the same with 4K being slightly better) the 4K is genuinely worse by a mile than the 1080p when you zoom in, I've provided screenshots and they're respectively 10x (extreme, i know, but a good demonstration) and you can notice the massive differences! i don't know why this is like this.
generally speaking the 4k camera is WAY better in comparison than 1080p when NOT zooming in.
RelicUser said:
Hey everyone, I noticed this while zooming using the 4K vs the 1080p quality (30fps both, 60fps setting both are the same with 4K being slightly better) the 4K is genuinely worse by a mile than the 1080p when you zoom in, I've provided screenshots and they're respectively 10x (extreme, i know, but a good demonstration) and you can notice the massive differences! i don't know why this is like this.
generally speaking the 4k camera is WAY better in comparison than 1080p when NOT zooming in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only the main camera in the middle is capable of recording at 4K. The wide angle and telephoto camera are maxing out at 1080p.
If you zoom in at 4K it will be digital. Only 1080p30 will allow you to use the the two additional lenses.
If you zoom in 10 times while on 1080p30, it will be the telephoto camera with 5x digital zoom. Hence, the better quality.
Macusercom said:
Only the main camera in the middle is capable of recording at 4K. The wide angle and telephoto camera are maxing out at 1080p.
If you zoom in at 4K it will be digital. Only 1080p30 will allow you to use the the two additional lenses.
If you zoom in 10 times while on 1080p30, it will be the telephoto camera with 5x digital zoom. Hence, the better quality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the explanation