please help me ... anyone have device & vendor for CM7 ancora?
I was dizzy ... to fix this error
Thanks before
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
http://pastebin.com/RBvmD0yE
are you using 32bit ubuntu? if so. you can not use it. You must use a 64bit ubuntu.
wekidev said:
are you using 32bit ubuntu? if so. you can not use it. You must use a 64bit ubuntu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i use ubuntu 10.04 64bit... camera now fix
vpart_aeip said:
i use ubuntu 10.04 64bit... camera now fix
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nice work. I think the error you overlay.cpp
:good:
wekidev said:
are you using 32bit ubuntu? if so. you can not use it. You must use a 64bit ubuntu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where you got this from?
vpart_aeip said:
i use ubuntu 10.04 64bit... camera now fix
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
camera fixed??? woaa :laugh::victory:
honeyx said:
Where you got this from?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
of all the articles I have ever read. all suggest to use 64bit ubuntu. CMIIW
for example chek link
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1863547
wekidev said:
of all the articles I have ever read. all suggest to use 64bit ubuntu. CMIIW
for example chek link
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1863547
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I build a gt-s5360 kernel with 32bit linux mint and I not found any problem. Linux mint based from ubuntu.. cmiiw
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
hizzzzzz said:
I build a gt-s5360 kernel with 32bit linux mint and I not found any problem. Linux mint based from ubuntu.. cmiiw
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey u .. This is talking about building ROM instead of building the kernel
do you understand? LOL
wekidev said:
hey u .. This is talking about building ROM instead of building the kernel
do you understand? LOL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in my opinion building rom and kernel is the same action but differeng branch, just try it yourself
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
wekidev said:
of all the articles I have ever read. all suggest to use 64bit ubuntu. CMIIW
for example chek link
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1863547
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wekidev said:
hey u .. This is talking about building ROM instead of building the kernel
do you understand? LOL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you want to build a ROM without a kernel? How you will make it work then?
Building ROMs and Kernels is the same procedure. You are just using different toolchains and this might be the only reason you need a 64 bit Linux. There are some CPU optimized toolchains for Kernel building which require a 64 bit Linux because they are precompiled in 64 bit.
However you can still use the generic toolchains to build the ROM and Kernel because they are aviable for both ( 32 and 64 bit), or you can take the optimized toolchain sources and compile your own ones for 32 bit.
It simply doesn´t matter you are using 32 or 64 bit. It only matters if you require the 64 bit toolchains to use some specific optimizations and can´t compile them yourself for some reason.
So I wounder why in the link you gave me I can´t finde anything about toolchains and cross compiling.
honeyx said:
So you want to build a ROM without a kernel? How you will make it work then?
Building ROMs and Kernels is the same procedure. You are just using different toolchains and this might be the only reason you need a 64 bit Linux. There are some CPU optimized toolchains for Kernel building which require a 64 bit Linux because they are precompiled in 64 bit.
However you can still use the generic toolchains to build the ROM and Kernel because they are aviable for both ( 32 and 64 bit), or you can take the optimized toolchain sources and compile your own ones for 32 bit.
It simply doesn´t matter you are using 32 or 64 bit. It only matters if you require the 64 bit toolchains to use some specific optimizations and can´t compile them yourse lf for some reason.
So I wounder why in the link you gave me I can´t finde anything about toolchains and cross compiling.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's what I mean thanks sir honeyx :thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
honeyx said:
So you want to build a ROM without a kernel? How you will make it work then?
Building ROMs and Kernels is the same procedure. You are just using different toolchains and this might be the only reason you need a 64 bit Linux. There are some CPU optimized toolchains for Kernel building which require a 64 bit Linux because they are precompiled in 64 bit.
However you can still use the generic toolchains to build the ROM and Kernel because they are aviable for both ( 32 and 64 bit), or you can take the optimized toolchain sources and compile your own ones for 32 bit.
It simply doesn´t matter you are using 32 or 64 bit. It only matters if you require the 64 bit toolchains to use some specific optimizations and can´t compile them yourself for some reason.
So I wounder why in the link you gave me I can´t finde anything about toolchains and cross compiling.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks in advance, which is very good information. sorry I only know a little about the ROM and KERNEL
I agree with @hurtsky
and I suggest 64 bit when you want to build rom ... because there are some lib that require 64-bit .... and when you want to build the kernel, no matter you want to use 64 bit or 32 bit.I use 64bit for build rom and kernel.
now i have problems in recovery ... and I think this problem exists in device / samsung / ancora ... but I have not been able to find, which one should I edit ...
Related
First thing - made the new thread just because i felt the kernel port was hijacking the CyanogenMod threads.
This thread to collaborate all efforts towards porting linux kernel 3.x. If any developers wish to help then please let us know, the more the merrier.
Do not ask for an ETA. If you do or try to cleverly disguise it by asking how long it takes on average or anything along these lines, your post will be reported to a moderator, and you'll probably go on a vacation from xda.
Source :
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_kernel_samsung_p1/tree/android-samsung-3.0 [aries tree atm]
http://review.cyanogenmod.org/25524 [current p1 patch]
Developers :
cdesai
humberos
koxudaxi
Why Do We Need Kernel 3.x
Easier updating the kernel to add security and performance boosts from mainline Linux kernels.
More support for new versions of Android.
No moar Samsung code.
Because it's just better.
Status:
Most of the code needed for gsm variants has been ported over, it doesn't boot yet though.
Without any way to debug it currently, we're sort of stuck here.
More info later.
For interested developers:
Initialize CyanogenMod source (https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android/blob/jellybean/README.mkdn#getting-started)
In the source directory, run
Code:
. build/envsetup.sh
cd kernel/samsung/p1
git checkout github/android-samsung-3.0
Next, get the latest patch from http://review.cyanogenmod.com/25524, and apply it to the tree using any method you prefer.
Compile the kernel with:
Code:
mka bootimage
If the kernel build fails, run:
Code:
make -j1 bootimage
Use pastebin for logs.
Flash the compiled boot.img with heimdall.
Code:
heimdall flash --kernel $OUT/boot.img
^after booting the tab into download mode, and successful compilation.
P.S. Please keep this thread clean, and i'll be editing the other posts to include the stuff mentioned.
Oooooooooooooooooooooooo
Power management and battery life should get better with a 3.x kernel correct?
Sent from my GT-P1000 using xda premium
U boot like the nook color?
slimdizzy said:
Oooooooooooooooooooooooo
Power management and battery life should get better with a 3.x kernel correct?
Sent from my GT-P1000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not a big improvement, but yea it'll be better.
YoshiFan501 said:
U boot like the nook color?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really, B&N had their own fork of u-boot and they posted sources, while this is a port from the DAS U-Boot sources.
Anyone got one of this?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1010314
I'ld make one but the solder points on the cable are really tiny, and i have to admit, it(soldering) is something i'm not at all good at.
If anyone has one, and would like to help me test, it'ld be nice.
Or if someone can send me one, it'ld be awesome!
i just compiled and flash kernel 3.0 following the instruccions but Kernel Version is still showing 2.6.35.13. Cheers.
bravokylee said:
I failed to install it: status 7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You sir are awesome!
juanpirulo said:
i just compiled and flash kernel 3.0 following the instruccions but Kernel Version is still showing 2.6.35.13. Cheers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope you didn't.
It doesn't boot yet, and you probably missed the checking out the 3.0 branch part.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using xda app-developers app
yep i missed that part. Thank you sir
3.x Kernel was released for Galaxy S devices. Could this help to force developement on 3.x Kernel for Galaxy Tab?
Heard no news for month at this thread...
elvitas said:
3.x Kernel was released for Galaxy S devices. Could this help to force developement on 3.x Kernel for Galaxy Tab?
Heard no news for month at this thread...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wasn't it released for Galaxy S Plus ? Then again I could be wrong
elvitas said:
3.x Kernel was released for Galaxy S devices. Could this help to force developement on 3.x Kernel for Galaxy Tab?
Heard no news for month at this thread...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3.x kernel will be able to work on Galaxy Tab... but , we must write a few code for only Galaxy Tab.
I and other developers are trying to port for 3.x kernel.
Please wait ...
S Plus kernel won't help, Galaxy S kernel has helped us though, that's what the current port is based on.
I've recently merged the aries tree, and done some cleanup of the code.
But , it's not booting yet. and without a serial cable there's no way we can debug it currently.
So, if anyone has one [ http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1010314 ], do let us know.
We'ld be happy to send you kernels to test, and you can get us logs.
cdesai said:
S Plus kernel won't help, Galaxy S kernel has helped us though, that's what the current port is based on.
I've recently merged the aries tree, and done some cleanup of the code.
But , it's not booting yet. and without a serial cable there's no way we can debug it currently.
So, if anyone has one [ http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1010314 ], do let us know.
We'ld be happy to send you kernels to test, and you can get us logs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i just made dock-to-serial adapter for debugging the kernel !!
i can watch boot loader messages by the adapter
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
koxudaxi said:
i just made dock-to-serial adapter for debugging the kernel !!
i can watch boot loader messages by the adapter
View attachment 1453572
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's great
I have some changes to mach-p1 to bring it inline with aries which I'll upload later today.
Btw, Ping me on gtalk when you're online.
Sent from my GT-P1000
EDIT: updated, http://review.cyanogenmod.org/25524
Could this be made to work pin the WiFi model
Sent from my GT-P1010 using Tapatalk 2
cdesai said:
That's great
I have some changes to mach-p1 to bring it inline with aries which I'll upload later today.
Btw, Ping me on gtalk when you're online.
Sent from my GT-P1000
EDIT: updated, http://review.cyanogenmod.org/25524
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so.. is debug started?
there is now a real hope to see 3.x kernel run on our p1000?
Franzferdinan51 said:
Could this be made to work pin the WiFi model
Sent from my GT-P1010 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi, Franzferdinan51
I don't know that the adapter can work with the wifi model .
but, if the wifi model can use an accessory for GT-P1000 (Dock station, video adopter....) then it will work
the best is to find the specifications for pins.
daevoq said:
so.. is debug started?
there is now a real hope to see 3.x kernel run on our p1000?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi, daevoq
the debug is started!!
I can access to the prompt of boot loader by the debug adapter.
And Only watch 3.x kernel debug messages.
3.x kernel is frozen while booting
you can see the kernel messages before the kernel freezes http://pastie.org/5190940
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This is a kernel that contains features that may make you think you are trained in ninjutsu, karate, taekwondo, muay thai and jeet kune do. If you choose to attack(flash this kernel), I cannot guarantee that you will not be injured(brick your phone).
Linux 3.4.104
268Mhz CPU step
Fastcharge
GPU overclock
CPU overclock
Powersuspend
Arch Power
Gentle Fair Sleepers
Intelli Thermal
Intelli Plug
LCD KCAL
Undervolt to 600mv
Extra TCP Congestion Controls
Extra IO schedulers
Extra CPU governors
Downloads: https://www.androidfilehost.com/?w=files&flid=21184
https://github.com/RIPng/
CyanogenMod
@f100cleveland for helping revive the sensei
@TheShoxter for the logo
Builds will have a naming convention that follows this pattern.
Kernel Name-Device Name.Build Number-Kernel Source Base(If more than one)
Example: SENSEI-FIND7.R2
ROM Compatibility:
Working
CyanogenMod
Paranoid Android
Mokee
Commotio
AICP
AOKP
Gummy
MIUI(CM base)
PAC
Not Working
OmniROM
Dirty Unicorns
teamEOS
Color OS
Nameless(WiFi broken)
Flashing Steps:
1. Reboot into custom recovery
2. Flash kernel zip
3. Reboot and rejoice
wow. Great to finally see a [KERNEL] thread! Thanks.
But i am not able to flash the kernel. Are there any steps to be followed?
suraj.das said:
wow. Great to finally see a [KERNEL] thread! Thanks.
But i am not able to flash the kernel. Are there any steps to be followed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you trying to flash exactly? I have to correct the download link, I am currently uploading the first build I don't have the device so I need owners to help me with bug reports and I will slowly merge(each build will have a couple new ones), but there may be several builds a day until we get to where I want this to be.
EDIT: It's up now, first build is R2, I have changed the download link to the correct folder
RIPng said:
What are you trying to flash exactly? I have to correct the download link, I am currently uploading the first build I don't have the device so I need owners to help me with bug reports and I will slowly merge(each build will have a couple new ones), but there may be several builds a day until we get to where I want this to be.
EDIT: It's up now, first build is R2, I have changed the download link to the correct folder
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great. I was trying to flash the file named with "find7op"
I am about to flash the first build now. I should just flash it through TWRP recovery right?
suraj.das said:
Great. I was trying to flash the file named with "find7op"
I am about to flash the first build now. I should just flash it through TWRP recovery right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, sir.
RIPng said:
Yes, sir.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool. My device is Find7a x9006. And I am on Nameless (Unified) I'll get back to you asap
---------- Post added at 10:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:46 AM ----------
Cant download the file!
suraj.das said:
Cool. My device is Find7a x9006. And I am on Nameless (Unified) I'll get back to you asap
---------- Post added at 10:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:46 AM ----------
Cant download the file!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Talk to me on hangouts if you can so I can troubleshoot the issue you are running into. [email protected]
is this only work with custom rom?
can it work with ColorOS KitKat?
Sent from my X9076 using xda premium
OldClass said:
is this only work with custom rom?
can it work with ColorOS KitKat?
Sent from my X9076 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it can't I am sorry, if you give me some time I may be willing and able to support it, I would also need the kernel source for it.
edit: deleted
RIPng said:
No it can't I am sorry, if you give me some time I may be willing and able to support it, I would also need the kernel source for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok... no problem
I hope you can make this kernel support for ColorOS too
OldClass said:
Ok... no problem
I hope you can make this kernel support for ColorOS too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If I had the kernel source it would be possible
Wow this is really happening!!! Thank you @RIPng and other people that help with the kernel porting
By the way, if we encounter any bug, what is the best way (or what kind of log file) to show you the error in order for you to debug it?
Doomboss said:
Wow this is really happening!!! Thank you @RIPng and other people that help with the kernel porting
By the way, if we encounter any bug, what is the best way (or what kind of log file) to show you the error in order for you to debug it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was all me for coding, there were a couple people testing for me Any bugs either need instructions to replicate or a last_kmsg for reboots. I do also sometimes honor reports of stuff just not working properly, but I need a proper description of what it occurring.
This is so great, first custom kernel for oppo
I'm on qhd #76 and flashed r5 zip, it flashed ok, but just blank screen! !!
Thx a lot for your efforts
Edit: forgot, I'm o cos 2.02
spoonymoon said:
This is so great, first custom kernel for oppo
I'm on qhd #76 and flashed r5 zip, it flashed ok, but just blank screen! !!
Thx a lot for your efforts
Edit: forgot, I'm o cos 2.02
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It wont work on ColorOs cuz this is a cm based kernel. Refer the dev's previous posts
Awesome!!! This is exciting! Will this work for x9006 as well?.
Thanks in advance!
nifear4 said:
Awesome!!! This is exciting! Will this work for x9006 as well?.
Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it should.
Is NetHunter (Android Kali) available to OnePlus3? will it be ported or is anyone already working on it?
I don't want to be rude asking for people to do it, if I could and I knew I would do it myself
only asking because in the offensive security github there is folder for OnePlus3 modules
thank you for your help and time
Port of Nethunter :: One Plus 3
I made some progress here but alas, kernel compilation failed.
I customized the kernel options as per off-sec's documentation, using the gtk-based menuconfig on a Kali (Sana) box , and attempted to compile (the kernel source cloned from OnePlus's msm8996 github repo). I powered through some run-of-the mill build problems and then encountered one that was a bit discouraging...failure to find Qualcomm drivers for their hardware cryptographic device... the Qualcomm "qce" driver package consisting of qcrypto and qcedev modules from...there's a google git repo...easy to find... I unfortunately cannot post the link due to less than ten posts.
I lost interest at that point. Maybe someone can shed more light on this? Has anyone else made significant progress here? Howabout bypassing this all together and disabling this module in the kernel options? It sounds important but the qce packages are also very old so perhaps some of the native ARM hardware cryptographic engines are superior and we can bypass it without loosing functionality? If they are necessary... how about using adb to pull these libraries from the device (OnePlus git repos contain a pull_library.sh script, perhaps that could grab the drivers and libraries over adb?)
I'm an experienced systems engineer and will be happy to do the technical work if someone (hopefully from OnePlus or Offensive Security) can assure me it's possible, feasible and there's no proprietary libraries/drivers that are going to squash the effort mid-way through. Will try outreach to Offensive Security as well.
For posterity: Nethunter is not a ROM. It is a ROM overlay that uses a custom kernel to adapt the device to the needs of the Nethunter app. This distinction is important as compiling a full ROM takes much, much longer (and many more headaches) than compiling the kernel alone. Compiling the kernel alone, however, is all that is required for Nethunter and this is feasible to do on a virtual machine in a matter of hours if you know what you're doing.
Happpy hacking,
$pecul0r
1) you need latest twrp recovery
2)first flash kernel and wipe charche
3) flash nethunter zip
4)you ara done
works with any freedom os, oxygen os (everythig works great just can't make duckhunter work)
Downloads:
kernel: https://build.nethunter.com/nightly/3.15.2-20161104-0105/kernel-nethunter-oneplus3-marshmallow-3.15.2-20161104-0105.zip
nethunter: https://build.nethunter.com/nightly/3.15.2-20161104-0105/nethunter-generic-armhf-kalifs-full-rolling-3.15.2-20161104-0105.zip
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
trongio said:
1) you need latest twrp recovery
2)first flash kernel and wipe charche
3) flash nethunter zip
4)you ara done
works with any freedom os, oxygen os (everythig works great just can't make duckhunter work)
Downloads:
kernel: https://build.nethunter.com/nightly...oneplus3-marshmallow-3.15.2-20161104-0105.zip
nethunter: https://build.nethunter.com/nightly...-kalifs-full-rolling-3.15.2-20161104-0105.zip
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you sure for this zip:-https://build.nethunter.com/nightly/3.15.2-20161104-0105/nethunter-generic-armhf-kalifs-full-rolling-3.15.2-20161104-0105.zip
not this?? :-https://build.nethunter.com/nightly/3.15.2-20161104-0105/nethunter-generic-arm64-kalifs-full-rolling-3.15.2-20161104-0105.zip
as our OP3 is arm64...i'm sure my guesses on above zip are wrong..also can you advise if it's gonna work with MultiROM>
does oneplus 3 wifi card support packet injection? can you hack a wifi without external wifi?
deeplyyoung said:
are you sure for this zip:-https://build.nethunter.com/nightly/3.15.2-20161104-0105/nethunter-generic-armhf-kalifs-full-rolling-3.15.2-20161104-0105.zip
not this?? :-https://build.nethunter.com/nightly/3.15.2-20161104-0105/nethunter-generic-arm64-kalifs-full-rolling-3.15.2-20161104-0105.zip
as our OP3 is arm64...i'm sure my guesses on above zip are wrong..also can you advise if it's gonna work with MultiROM>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't tried arm64 because armhf worked great. (but that may be the reason for Duckhunter not working on my op3)
if you will try please inform me
trongio said:
I haven't tried arm64 because armhf worked great. (but that may be the reason for Duckhunter not working on my op3)
if you will try please inform me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My main question :- is it gonna work as secondary ROM using multiROM?
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
deeplyyoung said:
My main question :- is it gonna work as secondary ROM using multiROM?
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it should work if you are going to install freedom os or oxygen os for secondary rom and than flash this kernel and rom over it (but Ihave not tested it)
---------- Post added at 01:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:49 PM ----------
sidhg said:
does oneplus 3 wifi card support packet injection? can you hack a wifi without external wifi?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no I tried.. you will need external wifi
I have flashed the latest kernel but my versione is elemntalx 0.22
scorpion90 said:
I have flashed the latest kernel but my versione is elemntalx 0.22
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which One you flashed buddy? Armhf or arm64 and duckhunter working for you?
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
deeplyyoung said:
Which One you flashed buddy? Armhf or arm64 and duckhunter working for you?
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have flashed armhf and duckhunter seems is not working.
Inviato dal mio ONEPLUS A3003 utilizzando Tapatalk
scorpion90 said:
I have flashed armhf and duckhunter seems is not working.
Inviato dal mio ONEPLUS A3003 utilizzando Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Won't you think arm64 is perfect for OP3
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
have you already flashed the 64bit version? A lot of people say to flash the armhf version not the arm64 version. I know that OPO3 has 64bit architecture.
Hello.
Is this a new ROM based on android? Or is it like sailfish os?
Pls put some light on this dumb fellow
Flashed arm64... But seems wifi broke now...
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
deeplyyoung said:
Flashed arm64... But seems wifi broke now...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and you have stock kernel.
have you flashed the stock rom before flashing the arm64 version?
scorpion90 said:
and you have stock kernel.
have you flashed the stock rom before flashing the arm64 version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flashed OP3 LITE 2.4.2 as secondary booted, configured with stock kernel.flashed nethunter kernel then arm64
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
Anyone else had issues getting this to work with the TL-WN722N external wifi adapter? The only way I can get it working is with OOS 3.2.4. If I go any newer the internal wifi stops working. Also is Drivedroid working? If I change the USB mode it causes a kernel crash and reboot. Other than that everything else is working fine.
Just noticed that the latest Nethunter nightly has some wifi fixes so it might now be fixed. I'll update when I get a chance and try again.
Hey,
I just bought a Op3. I want to use Nethunter for the first tkme, what is the best rom to use this with ?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Version 13 for the Xiaomi Mi5
This builds are based on https://github.com/CyanogenMod and the Mi5 Device Tree from https://github.com/Mi5Devs/android_device_xiaomi_gemini
Active Developer of the DeviceTree is here bgcngm
ROM Status: Beta (Prebuild Xiaomi Kernel)
Current Build: 20160906
Download Main: https://store.shade.sh/mi5/
Download Mirror: https://mirror.shade.sh/mi5/
OTA Updates: Available, weekly.
Known Issues: Ambient Display and Capacitive Home Button
Keyboard Layout: If you want the original Xiaomi Layout back: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=68440544&postcount=353 & http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=68410880&postcount=319
Disclammer: I'm not a developer of this Rom! I'm just using the Device Tree and the Cyanogenmod to build this Roms.
Are you using it for yourself as well so you're not building in the blind ?
Sent from my MI 5 using XDA Premium HD app
Anyone else having a problem with the fluidity of animations after updating to 20160726?
shade.sh said:
As there is no official Cyanogenmod nor i'm a developer, i'm only created this thread for those who uses my builds.
This builds are based on https://github.com/CyanogenMod and the Mi5 Device Tree from https://github.com/Mi5Devs/android_device_xiaomi_gemini
Normally my builds are created daily, it can be that there are no or not important changes in Device Tree or Cyanogenmod, then there is no new build created. To view changes, please visit the Mi5Devs Commits
Current Build: cm-13.0-20160726-UNOFFICIAL-gemini
URL: https://store.shade.sh/mi5/
Disclammer: I'm not a developer of this Rom! I'm just using the Device Tree and the Cyanogenmod to build this Roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any updates for the finger print issue ?
marcel112 said:
Are you using it for yourself as well so you're not building in the blind ?
Sent from my MI 5 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes
Ramshu97 said:
Any updates for the finger print issue ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe this?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=67874556&postcount=577
shade.sh said:
Maybe this?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=67874556&postcount=577
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello,
I did the same fastboot commands and fingerprint start working, but actually now I'm facing another issue, my screen doesn't turn on for a while, when I received any notifications while the screen is locked. However, it works fine when the screen is just turned off, but not locked.
Sent from my MI 5 using XDA-Developers mobile app
thanks for creating a new thread, it was getting a bit confusing.. danke !
is it safe to dirty flash from CM - 20160521 ?
leighaus said:
thanks for creating a new thread, it was getting a bit confusing.. danke !
is it safe to dirty flash from CM - 20160521 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I came from the same version, did'nt hurt me
Great rom, been using the 20-Jul build for a week now and it works flawlessly.. only had trouble with the fingerprint sensor, at first it was completely missing, but got it back and working by flashing MIUI8 before flashing this rom.. it seems that it needs some files from MIUI so avoid wiping system, although this may be fixed already in new builds, I can't say..
Anyway great rom great work, updating to latest build.. thanks again developers and builder!
nono.zz said:
Great rom, been using the 20-Jul build for a week now and it works flawlessly.. only had trouble with the fingerprint sensor, at first it was completely missing, but got it back and working by flashing MIUI8 before flashing this rom.. it seems that it needs some files from MIUI so avoid wiping system, although this may be fixed already in new builds, I can't say..
Anyway great rom great work, updating to latest build.. thanks again developers and builder!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes this issue should be fixed by the Devs of the Device Tree already.
You're welcome.
shade.sh said:
Yes this issue should be fixed by the Devs of the Device Tree already.
You're welcome.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is! I wiped the system partition and it worked flawlessly!
Thanks a million for providing new builds!
BTW @shade, is it possibl to compile this with UBERTC https://plus.google.com/+ChetKener/posts/YzMJEkzPQgp
Here is info how to compile with a specific toolchain http://forum.xda-developers.com/chef-central/android/guide-switching-to-custom-toolchain-t2927662
I know you're probably busy but if you find it interesting or fun to add UBER Toolchain to your build i would gladly buy you are beer or two
In return i could give a tip about my app called Auto Flasher. It was featured in XDA Developers TV
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4IABWtuihU
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=se.davison.autoflasher
richardddd said:
BTW @shade, is it possibl to compile this with UBERTC https://plus.google.com/+ChetKener/posts/YzMJEkzPQgp
Here is info how to compile with a specific toolchain http://forum.xda-developers.com/chef-central/android/guide-switching-to-custom-toolchain-t2927662
I know you're probably busy but if you find it interesting or fun to add UBER Toolchain to your build i would gladly buy you are beer or two
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll look into it, its always fun to try something new / different!
But don't expect it the next hours or days. Indeed i'm a bit busy at the moment (Self study CCNA is only a small part of it :fingers-crossed
How is the picture quality compared to stock? I know from the Sony cm builds that they are much worse compared to stock firmware...
peddarson said:
How is the picture quality compared to stock? I know from the Sony cm builds that they are much worse compared to stock firmware...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I feel that the picture quality is the same. Actually I kind of prefer the cm camera app since it has more options and is easier to configure. I experienced some lag on one of the builds but it seems to be fixed now.
The reason why the difference is massive on Sony phones is because of the bravia engine which is proprietary and cannot be integrated into CM or AOSP. This should not be an issue on the Mi 5.
blacklord9 said:
I feel that the picture quality is the same. Actually I kind of prefer the cm camera app since it has more options and is easier to configure. I experienced some lag on one of the builds but it seems to be fixed now.
The reason why the difference is massive on Sony phones is because of the bravia engine which is proprietary and cannot be integrated into CM or AOSP. This should not be an issue on the Mi 5.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the reply. Hopefully I will receive my mi5 pro within the next two weeks so I can try.
richardddd said:
It is! I wiped the system partition and it worked flawlessly!
Thanks a million for providing new builds!
BTW @shade, is it possibl to compile this with UBERTC https://plus.google.com/+ChetKener/posts/YzMJEkzPQgp
Here is info how to compile with a specific toolchain http://forum.xda-developers.com/chef-central/android/guide-switching-to-custom-toolchain-t2927662
I know you're probably busy but if you find it interesting or fun to add UBER Toolchain to your build i would gladly buy you are beer or two
In return i could give a tip about my app called Auto Flasher. It was featured in XDA Developers TV
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4IABWtuihU
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=se.davison.autoflasher
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not getting through,the builds is coming up with the gcc google tc 4.9.x itself shade.sh any progress here?
droid.riz said:
Its not getting through the buils is coming up with the gcc google tc 4.9.x itself shade.sh any progress here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Had no chance today to try it, had some trouble with iwStack...
I'll try it for sure on the weekend.
Dear shade.sh,
Thanks for the great ROM. It is like oases in the deserts.
I am having a problems with wifi mac address which keep on changing every time I reboot the phone. I tried to use the apps to use my old mac address number which is registered to the office network but it fails to connect.
Please advice how to overcome the random wifi mac address.
Thanks.
aatjitra said:
Dear shade.sh,
Thanks for the great ROM. It is like oases in the deserts.
I am having a problems with wifi mac address which keep on changing every time I reboot the phone. I tried to use the apps to use my old mac address number which is registered to the office network but it fails to connect.
Please advice how to overcome the random wifi mac address.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What version have you flashed? Did you already tried to flash the updated firmware files (See here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=67874556&postcount=577)
Hi xda community, I'm here to call for help. This phone is infernal to mod, it rejects kernels, there is no custom rom, building recovery is the "easiest" thing to do (it took me at least 5 hours) but today after hours and hours trying and googling, i cant make it alone but togheter it can work, i'am calling help for building a custom kernel, any help is accepted, if anyone wants to help direct source fork and pull request after changes to this github repo: https://github.com/malikh0206/kernel-test-a32 but you can also help in the thread. I explain the situation here:
-The build crashes "randomly" (I think I can fix it, but I really dont know) FIXED ! I just had to add "apt install xz-utils" in the entrypoint.sh
-We need to mod it (I can mod a little bit but after i dont know)
-The phone rejects all self-built kernel (I really need help for that). edit: OH MA GAD THANK YOU SO MUCH @Captain_cookie_200 for fixing this, now it's working and I can disable SElinux (Im gonna attach the file just flash it) It's a very big step, yesssssss so happy it's been weeks and weeks. We can say this is a first release.
I will make updates after time. Thank you very much if you can help me, hoping it works.
The kernel can be better but I think it can be in a few time a real custom kernel, so I think I will convert the thread, but it will in constant developement.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Features :
- SElinux permissive now possible
- Interactive CPU gouvernor
- KVM (need testing)
- Disable kernel panic?
Release on github !
(One sentence: We need a name, don't hesitate to put an idea)
Just passing by, hoping for the best!
RadicalTeletubby said:
Just passing by, hoping for the best!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks
i think i can help you but i dont know very much about kernels
Why the custom kernel? The stock one does not work correctly or you need more horsepower? As of that there is no custom ROM you can actually make one yourself using this thing.
uluruman said:
Why the custom kernel? The stock one does not work correctly or you need more horsepower? As of that there is no custom ROM you can actually make one yourself using this thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I want to make a custom kernel because some peoples ask for it (permissive mode, etc) and making a custom from scratch (only for SM-A325F) but just pack a GSI on a super.img is a little bit useless when you can use TWRP for like any GSI
musatbz said:
i think i can help you but i dont know very much about kernels
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you know why the phone is bootlooping with a custom kernel it would be awesome
kilam9900 said:
If you know why the phone is bootlooping with a custom kernel it would be awesome
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong arch? Are you sure you're cross-compiling it correctly for arm64?
Here is some info: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/657882/how-do-i-cross-compile-the-linux-kernel
uluruman said:
Wrong arch? Are you sure you're cross-compiling it correctly for arm64?
Here is some info: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/657882/how-do-i-cross-compile-the-linux-kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
euhm ill check
someone actually built a kernel for this phone. i am daily driving it on android 11 fw with android 13 gsi. It broke on android 13 firmware and i expirienced a bootloop on gsi. Also i noticed something. try to flash something on top like a gsi. Even tho the logs said it booted completely my phone remained on the boot screen. flashing a gsi fixed it!
Captain_cookie_200 said:
someone actually built a kernel for this phone. i am daily driving it on android 11 fw with android 13 gsi. It broke on android 13 firmware and i expirienced a bootloop on gsi. Also i noticed something. try to flash something on top like a gsi. Even tho the logs said it booted completely my phone remained on the boot screen. flashing a gsi fixed it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I requested samsung to release source for the latest android 11 firmware for this phone and they did so! the kernel i am using was compiled with that source. you can go to samsung opensource and maybe use that.
Captain_cookie_200 said:
I requested samsung to release source for the latest android 11 firmware for this phone and they did so! the kernel i am using was compiled with that source. you can go to samsung opensource and maybe use that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you, that's good info, I was already using the open source Samsung SWA kernel, i gonna try to flash GSI on top and who or where did you get the kernel (compiled) ?
kilam9900 said:
Merci, c'est de bonne info, juttilisais deja le kernel SWA de open source Samsung, i gonna try to flash GSI on top and who or where did you get the kernel (compiled) ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
someone did it for me. and used anykernel to flash it. samsung also released the sources for A325FXXU2AVB6 after me begging them. You could try building it from that. it worked fine on android 11 firmware. although it refuses to boot on android 13. android 12 kernels still work but i still requested samsung to release sources for android 13 as well.
Captain_cookie_200 said:
someone did it for me. and used anykernel to flash it. samsung also released the sources for A325FXXU2AVB6 after me begging them. You could try building it from that. it worked fine on android 11 firmware. although it refuses to boot on android 13. android 12 kernels still work but i still requested samsung to release sources for android 13 as well.
View attachment 5784869
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ohh I didnt see that, i will try Rn
kilam9900 said:
Ohh I didnt see that, i will try Rn
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
okay! i hope it works. Also make sure to use a gsi. one ui doesnt like custom kernels for some reason.
will this work with A325M ?
applesucksLmao said:
will this work with A325M ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Humm I dont see why not, save your boot img by TWRP and try, if its not working just restore boot img
kilam9900 said:
Hi xda community, I'm here to call for help. This phone is infernal to mod, it rejects kernels, there is no custom rom, building recovery is the "easiest" thing to do (it took me at least 5 hours) but today after hours and hours trying and googling, i cant make it alone but togheter it can work, i'am calling help for building a custom kernel, any help is accepted, if anyone wants to help direct source fork and pull request after changes to this github repo: github.com/malikh0206/kernel-test-a32 but you can also help in the thread. I explain the situation here:
-The build crashes "randomly" (I think I can fix it, but I really dont know) FIXED ! I just had to add "apt install xz-utils" in the entrypoint.sh
-We need to mod it (I can mod a little bit but after i dont know)
-The phone rejects all self-built kernel (I really need help for that). edit: OH MA GAD THANK YOU SO MUCH @Captain_cookie_200 for fixing this, now it's working and I can disable SElinux (Im gonna attach the file just flash it) It's a very big step, yesssssss so happy it's been weeks and weeks. We can say this is a first release.
I will make updates after time. Thank you very much if you can help me, hoping it works.
The kernel can be better but I think it can be in a few time a real custom kernel, so I think I will convert the thread, but it will in constant developement.
View attachment 5786767View attachment 5786769
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey kilam,
I have been scouring the internet for a long time to find a custom kernal for my A325F/DS with external ralink wifi adapter drivers. But could not find a trace. Can you help me build one. I can help you with your project.
checksum.Burhan_Arif said:
Hey kilam,
I have been scouring the internet for a long time to find a custom kernal for my A325F/DS with external ralink wifi adapter drivers. But could not find a trace. Can you help me build one. I can help you with your project.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course I will help you !, there is a github for the driver? prebuilt .ko module, or other methode to implement it to the kernel?