[Q] 3G Battery consumption - Samsung Galaxy Nexus

Hey,
when I use 3G I get about 2H of screen time,
and when I use WiFi I get about 4H (max).
My usage is WhatsApp, Browser etc..
Is it normal that I'm getting half of the time with 3G?
Can it be fixed with another baseband?

Any help?

3G uses more battery since it's also searching for better connection all the time(unless you choose 2G only in mobile network options, then you get better battery but speed is not so fast anymore).

I can confirm that a weak 3G connection gobbles up battery charge very quickly. This is a flaw in the radio firmware or perhaps somewhere else. Of course the phone should switch to 2G automatically when 3G is not used intensively, but uses excessive amounts of electricity, but the designers apparently overlooked this.
Your main option is, as already mentioned, to do the thing manually that your phone fails to do automatically—force 2G only.
If you do that, don't forget to disable the force-2G option again when (a) you need the higher speed and the connection is good enough for that, or (b) if you moved into an area with better reception, like 3 or 4 bars.
Alternatively, leave the settings untouched, i.e. 3G enabled, and keep charging the phone if you are stationary and have electricity nearby. You can charge from a computer, albeit at half speed.

I almost always have 3/4 bars, so I don't think I have a connection problem.

Related

3G Battery Consumption v WIFI

Am i right in thinking the main culprit for wasting battery is 3G? when i use WIFI and am at home, the phones goes easy 2 days and im watching youtube, playing angry bird, chatting on gtalk.
with 3G, lucky to get a full day, normally dies towards the end,
so how come 3G kills the battery so hard is there a remedy to it lol
thanks
3g could be trouble when you have weak or unstable signal. In normal cases wifi uses more juice.
for me, 3g doubles the consumption compared to wifi. (t-mobile uk)
Similar issues here on 3 in the UK using official HTC unbranded ROM with radio 32.44.00.32U_5.09.05.30_2. I can get well over a day with as much use as I wanton WiFi but if I switch it off and move to 3G (HSDPA) I completely flatten a battery in anywhere from 3 to 8 hours, sometimes with minimal actual usage!
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
yh on t-mob too, it could be the signal as iv read weak signals can drain battery, its strange, normally its wifi that drains the battery, but i have it on all day , dont have any inactivity settings on, its full blast all day and the battery stays 70-80% by round 1am when i sleep,
3g, it will be around 20% at that time, it is a strange one
While idle 3G uses more power than WiFi.
While active WiFi uses more power than 3G.
While that may like it seem like WiFi can use more when actively using it. It also finishes quicker and goes back to idling. Which uses less power in the end.
Both use more if the reception/signal is weak, as it's constantly trying to (re)connect.

Post Your Radio Observations and Experiences

So I recently decided to try out different radios to see what they have to offer. I will post my observations here. For reference I have a G2 on T-Mobile in upstate NY area.
I started with the stock T-Mobile OTA radio, 26.03.02.26 on stock froyo rooted. I had no particular complaints about this combo, though I thought idle power consumption was way too high. I would lose over 35% idling over night on wifi calling.
I flashed CM7 stable and heard that the latest radio was required for full functionality. I tried flashing without updating the radio first, and GPS was non-functional. So I flashed the latest gingerbread test radio, 26.08.04.16 and GPS was working again. Now I am extremely pleased with battery life. Max idle power consumption I have seen so far was 8% overnight on wifi calling. If I charge to full right before going to bed, it still say 100% when I wake up in the morning.
In addition to the increase in battery life, data speeds were much improved. At home, with only two bars of H, I used to get just above 1Mbps down. The new radio easily and consistently hits over 2Mbps in the same location with the same reception.
I do think there are some trade offs with this radio though. I noticed a higher rate of wifi disconnects. Every now and then when I look at my phone, wifi calling has dropped and I have no data. Takes a few seconds to come back. I'm still not entirely sure if this is radio related or if it is my specific wifi environment.
I also noticed my phone bouncing between 3G and H a lot more frequently with the newer radio. In areas where I used to get very solid H, it will now bounce between 3G and H. Connectivity is not affected and I hope this is not bad for battery life. I suspect reception is slightly worse with this radio, maybe the tradeoff for better speeds.
I recently flashed back to the T-Mobile OTA radio to test it with CM7 and I was horrified at the battery drain. I lost 25% in less than 2 hours. Granted, the phone was active for half that time, but even still, that is terrible battery life. Needless to say, I am back to the 26.08.04.16 radio.
What have you noticed about the various radios you have tried so far? Any preferences? Post your experiences.
--MrAnt--
Just got off the phone using 26.08.04.16 and my call quality is extremely clear.
With the stock radio and the stock ROM I had terrible cell coverage in general, I would routinely not have usable cell signal let along data in my house even when my old G1 or two MyTouch 4G devices would work fine.
Specific symptoms would be the phone randomly cycling between 2-3 bars of 3G/HSPA+ and 2-3 bars of EDGE and then no bars of anything, even if it reported 2-3 bars when you went to use it almost invariably you would lose all bars and would be unable to make a call or use data. Could not identify any sort of pattern, it looked like the phone was having a hard time negotiating with one or more cell sites, I'd guess that there are two that have OK but not great coverage in range of my house and the phone could not figure out which one it wanted to connect to.
While still on the stock ROM I loaded radio 26.04.02.17, it did seem to help some but not significantly.'
After I switched to CM7 final there wasn't much if any change to my cell coverage (still sucks) but my GPS was ridiculously unreliable/unstable. I am a Foursquare users and use GPS every day several times a day and my phone would not turn on GPS consistently and would not turn it off consistently when I exited the application. A couple times I could not turn off GPS even if I disabled it in settings and would need to reboot to get GPS to turn off. Sometimes I would have to try several times (by exiting/restarting my GPS enabled application) to get it to turn on and sometimes it would just randomly turn off while in use (had this happen twice while using navigation). I would need to exit the GPS enabled app (exit navigation if I was using it) and then relaunch (sometimes more than once) to get GPS back up and running again)
I tried using the wipe the EFS data fix but that didn't fix my GPS problems
I have since upgraded my radio to 26.08.04.16 which has made my GPS better (but not as reliable as it was before CM7), I think my cell coverage/data is better but honestly the GPS is a much higher visibility problem for me so I haven't been paying as much attention to that.
Interesting, my GPS reception seemed to improve a lot with the new radio and CM7. Used to take well over a minute for a GPS lock, now its around 10-20 seconds.
I also have no cell reception problems, just power consumption complaints.
I just flashed the new test radio that was leaked, 26.8.04.30. I'm hoping this will solve my flaky wifi issues and, if I'm lucky, reduce cell radio power consumption to something more reasonable/manageable. I will update once I have a chance to try it out and see how battery performance is.
So far the wifi appears more stable, and cell bandwidth is about the same as the 26.8.04.16 radio, maybe even a little better.
--MrAnt--
mrant said:
Interesting, my GPS reception seemed to improve a lot with the new radio and CM7. Used to take well over a minute for a GPS lock, now its around 10-20 seconds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have noticed when GPS works it is much faster than stock, GPS locks, when I can get them are lightning fast (usually less than 5 seconds if I'm outdoors in a remotely clear area).
Interesting problem I had yesterday, I would fire up my GPS app (tried both Foursquare and Google Maps) and the GPS icon would activate then turn off after 1 second, usually if I exit my app and relaunch it a few times I'm able to get it working again but yesterday I needed to disable and re-enable GPS to fix the problem. These problems are very strange.
Just tested GPS lock in a location where it used to take forever, so long I never waited for a lock before moving to a window. Sitting on my couch, a good 15 feet from the nearest window, I got a lock in 10s flat. Impressive.
Battery life does not seem to have changed in the latest radio, .30, and things seem more stable and faster. Battery consumption is about 2%/hr on wifi calling, and a little under 4%/hr for cell radio. These are idle consumption rates.
Additionally, my HSPA+ speeds have reached rates I have never seen with my phone before. I just clocked in a hair under 5Mbps down and almost 2Mbps up. I used to see only 1-1.5 down and .25-.5 up.
I am very pleased with the performance and power consumption improvements this radio brings.
--MrAnt--

[Q] Desire Z : Really Inconsistent Speeds + Battery Issues

Friend has a new Desire Z (bell, unlocked). Using it on AT&T network.
When at a house, and we use WiFI (30Mbps DL, 25Mbps UL), the speeds are VERY inconsistent. With my iPhone 4 using speedtest.net, it shows up as 20/15 each time. (WiFi is a little slower than the modem).
With the Desire Z, we get 15/10 (which is fine/acceptable). Then 3 minutes later we do it, we get 5/2. Without even moving the phone or touching the modem connection (not downloading anything on the computer), the connection just gets slower. Then it might be fast or slow, basically it's a toss-up.
The first time we noticed the issue is because when we are outside, we get HSPA speeds of 2.5/1.0, then randomly decreases to 0.1/0.05. HUGE difference. And VERY inconsistent. He is using a microSIM from iPhone 4, with an adapter, so we figured maybe the SIM card is getting loose at certain points? However, the WiFi is also inconsistent in addition to the HSPA, so it's probably not that.
What should I do? Is this the situation where I have to flash a new radio or something? (Please suggest others if I am wrong).
Thanks!
---
Also, his battery is kinda weak. The battery health is apparently clean/healthy. He came from an iPhone 4, where he would have 3G, WiFi, and GPS on at night but not actually using them. Wake up, and 3% battery loss, maybe 5. WITHOUT using them, just having them on.
Now, with the Desire Z, we have the WiFi + 3G on, but NOT the GPS. He is losing 20%-25% in 8 hours without even using the phone.
Information about battery shows a high Cell standby (25%) and Phone idle (25%) percentage. When going into Spare Parts > Partial Wake usage, we didn't find anything really fishy. BUT we had rebooted so perhaps some info may have been lossed. Should he just go to sleep tonight and report the Partial Wake Usage statistics again?
We have a feeling it may be some apps refreshing at night.. But he clears all the apps with Advanced Task Manager except for like Facebook (2 hour interval refresh), GMail, and Google Voice.
I highly doubt a 20% battery decrease overnight is normal.. My mom's Atrix only loses about 5% overnight, with the same parameters I gave before.
I thought it may be a bad battery, BUT the phone idle + cell standby are abnormally high.
Thanks!
Does anyone have an answer? I was wondering this
I have been running CM 6 since November and just recently flashed CM 7. On both ROMs, Cell Standby and Phone Idle have been very high on my list of things that are 'draining' the battery.
For example, today Cell Standby shows as 37% and Phone Idle as 30% for me.
In fact, its very rare that these two things aren't at the top of the list of things that are using the battery for me.... I've seen cell standby as high as 47% before.
I can't speak for the drainage overnight. Definitely doesn't sound normal to me, but my phone is usually on the charger overnight (have enough trouble making it through the day with the stock battery).
Have you tried using Watchdog to monitor CPU usage of apps that run in the background? You could set the notification threshold very low and see what it spits out... Good luck!
gbarayah, thanks for the post, that was helpful.
If anyone can help with the inconsistent data speeds, that'd be very helpful.
And any additional info on the battery would be great too. I recently calibrated it, and will post any additional stats.
Damn it, I forgot to try Watchdog. However, I re-calibrated the battery, let it die, charged it up, let it die, charged it up. I followed the instructions to the letter and all that.
It was at 100% when I went to sleep. Woke up 8 hours later, 74%.
Settings > Battery shows nothing high 40% for cell standby and phone idle. Everything else (Facebook, etc.) REALLY low.
Then I went to Spare Parts > Battery Usage, Partial wake usage, everything incredibly low as well..
I will try Watchdog, but could it just be a bad battery? Or maybe should I try a different ROM?
Thanks!
Not sure if 26% drain over 8 hours is normal or not... Maybe someone else can shed some light on that. My phone is usually on the charger overnight.
The only other thing I can think of that would drain the battery is if you have a bad/weak cell signal in your area. I've experienced that with some job sites where my cell signal is very bad and my battery suffers excessive drain from trying to get a better signal or connect to 3G coming from Edge.
On my week old desire Z running virtuous unity sense3.0 rom and streamlined kernal i very rarely see phone idle and radio burning battery lik you say. Radio occasionaly gets high but only wen in bad coverage areas other than thats its ok.
Battery is still rubbish though due to fact even on 2nd lowest brightness setting screen seems to burn 80%-90% battery
Just checked: phone idle:2%
Cell stanby:8%
Screen (lowest setting):70%
Not this isnt a great example as its taken over a short period of havy use but it still reflects the relative proportion of the battery draining elements in question.
Also a question, if you have a live wallpaper set where is its battery drain shown? Screen, or launcher?
Not sure what to say about the high variable speeds.
Sticking to just GSM(2G) rather than AUTO will in some cases increase the signal and battery life at the expense of slower connection speeds. As mentioned when the phone struggles to get signal the battery gets drained alot faster.
Lower the refresh intervals of all the apps to the maximum period of time or a reasonable amount like 12 hours for FB for Sense, HTC Sense and Weather and 4 hours or Never (to make it on-demand) for Facebook.
Setting the Wi-fi sleep policy to "Never when connected" may make it on-demand too - when an app needs to update Wi-fi gets turned on again
If they have "Use wireless networks" checked to allow the clock-weathers mini-widget to update then they should try removing said clock and re-adding it, but search for the city when doing so. It'll provide them with a general outlook for their entire city and not force it to download and update the information for wherever they are whilst out and about. E.g if you were in London and went from Westminster to Peckham, it may update as you pass through each borough.
Live wallpapers and masses of widgets that need to constantly update are nice and everything but they can also drain the battery.
Think of these suggestions as ways to cycle the battery as well as save it.
I can't think of anything else to add.
I'm using Cyanogenmod 7 and it's pretty damn good. What do you think is the best ROM with Gingerbread if it's more lightweight and easier on the battery? (I honestly don't think the ROM accounts for the 25% battery loss but we'll see)
MIUI or mexiDroid for me?
By the way, could it just be a bad battery? I was thinking about picking one of these up:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=940263
$8 and people said it's okay.. What do you think?
Thanks, and I JUST calibrated recently, so once again I will leave phone off overnight and report.
-----------------------
As for the network issues, I FIGURED IT OUT!!!
I believe it was the Speedtest app itself that was messed up. Like I said earlier, I don't have live wallpapers (just info) on, and also NO GPS unless using Navigation.
Well, Speedtest was connecting to WICHITA, KANSAS. I AM IN NEW JERSEY. WTH??!!
Anyway, so I'm going to keep GPS (satellites) on, it connects to NJ, and Voila, GREAT SPEEDS!
HSPA about 3.5/1.0 DL/UL
HOORAY! Network problem fixed!!!
Only issue is battery still D:
Honestly, I think it may be a bad battery. Partial wake usage doesn't show any app going nuts.. Every refresh interval is like 4 hours. And I use Advanced Task Killer to kill all apps before going to bed. I downloaded "Watchdog," let's see
gyromanx55 said:
Friend has a new Desire Z (bell, unlocked). Using it on AT&T network.
When at a house, and we use WiFI (30Mbps DL, 25Mbps UL), the speeds are VERY inconsistent. With my iPhone 4 using speedtest.net, it shows up as 20/15 each time. (WiFi is a little slower than the modem).
With the Desire Z, we get 15/10 (which is fine/acceptable). Then 3 minutes later we do it, we get 5/2. Without even moving the phone or touching the modem connection (not downloading anything on the computer), the connection just gets slower. Then it might be fast or slow, basically it's a toss-up.
The first time we noticed the issue is because when we are outside, we get HSPA speeds of 2.5/1.0, then randomly decreases to 0.1/0.05. HUGE difference. And VERY inconsistent. He is using a microSIM from iPhone 4, with an adapter, so we figured maybe the SIM card is getting loose at certain points? However, the WiFi is also inconsistent in addition to the HSPA, so it's probably not that.
What should I do? Is this the situation where I have to flash a new radio or something? (Please suggest others if I am wrong).
Thanks!
---
Also, his battery is kinda weak. The battery health is apparently clean/healthy. He came from an iPhone 4, where he would have 3G, WiFi, and GPS on at night but not actually using them. Wake up, and 3% battery loss, maybe 5. WITHOUT using them, just having them on.
Now, with the Desire Z, we have the WiFi + 3G on, but NOT the GPS. He is losing 20%-25% in 8 hours without even using the phone.
Information about battery shows a high Cell standby (25%) and Phone idle (25%) percentage. When going into Spare Parts > Partial Wake usage, we didn't find anything really fishy. BUT we had rebooted so perhaps some info may have been lossed. Should he just go to sleep tonight and report the Partial Wake Usage statistics again?
We have a feeling it may be some apps refreshing at night.. But he clears all the apps with Advanced Task Manager except for like Facebook (2 hour interval refresh), GMail, and Google Voice.
I highly doubt a 20% battery decrease overnight is normal.. My mom's Atrix only loses about 5% overnight, with the same parameters I gave before.
I thought it may be a bad battery, BUT the phone idle + cell standby are abnormally high.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well... can't be that odd. Mine are
cell standby: 8%
Phone idle 6%
display 51% (highest)
dialer 11%
wifi 10%
....
about conn. speed. I haven't used speedtest yet but downloading speed on the phone is slower than on PC remarkably using the same internet connection
barclays said:
well... can't be that odd. Mine are
cell standby: 8%
Phone idle 6%
display 51% (highest)
dialer 11%
wifi 10%
....
about conn. speed. I haven't used speedtest yet but downloading speed on the phone is slower than on PC remarkably using the same internet connection
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WiFi will always be slower than wired connection, probably about 50% if not more.
Also, what setting do you have your display on and how much would you say you use your phone/have the screen on and how often do you talk (hrs/day)
noneabove said:
WiFi will always be slower than wired connection, probably about 50% if not more.
Also, what setting do you have your display on and how much would you say you use your phone/have the screen on and how often do you talk (hrs/day)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have auto brightness but I stay in office and not turn it on much (have to work though ) so the display isn't on much (when i said HIGHEST, it means highest in the list )
I have to phone connected to wifi all day but rarely use it
Mainly use the phone to text and talk less and 1/hr/day
Just try left the phone unused (stand by - airplane mode) for one day, drop about 20% or so
Its seems like its getting a little better.. only lost 10% overnight. Guess its calibrating
Sent from my HTC Desire Z using XDA Premium App

Just gotta email from sprint

They were sayn that wifi saves batt up to 50%. Ive always been told the exact oppisite. Wifi kills batt life. Wtf
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
harley1rocker said:
They were sayn that wifi saves batt up to 50%. Ive always been told the exact oppisite. Wifi kills batt life. Wtf
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on distance/strength of wifi signal...
It's a good way for them convince you to not use your data connection for a while and slow down the network.
Sent from my Super Galaxy'd SPH-D710
I got an email/text or statement insert saying the exact same thing. Funny thing is ever since that statement I have always made sure to have wifi on when home.
I know it sorta turns off when disconnected but then it scans and picks up wifi networks so I just turn it off when I leave the house.
On my OG Evo I did not notice any change in battery life with wifi on.
Searching for WiFi is what really kills the battery which is why I turn mine off and on manually rather than leaving it on. If I'm in an area with WiFi available and my 3G signal is low, then I'll turn on my WiFi, also when I'm at work or home my WiFi is always on but if I'm out and about then I keep WiFi off rather than have it drain my battery constantly looking for signal.
Technically, I think Wifi takes up less battery than, say 3G when actively used.
Just a guess o-0
MochaCharok said:
Technically, I think Wifi takes up less battery than, say 3G when actively used.
Just a guess o-0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would think this is true, especially if you're sitting close to the router like at home or work rather than pinging off a cell tower however far away.
It goes both way guys. When idle, wifi consumes more battery than an active cellular data connection.
By virtue of simply being more efficient, wifi consumes "less" when actively using it. This is, however, because of the generally increased data speeds: it takes less time to accomplish a task (I.e. downloading a file), thus providing battery savings. In this regards, even 4g consumes less battery, even though it technically takes more juice to run 4g.
The way to really look at it so it becomes clear is say, hypothetically, you had a wifi connection whose internet side connection was very slow. In this regards, wifi doesn't save you any battery, and will probably end up consuming more, simply because its gain in efficiency is now gone.
Of course sprint wants us to get off cell data as much as possible, but in a lot of real world situations, it will save someone battery. Take my typical work day for example:
I wake up at home, drive to work, stay at work all day, then go home and probably stay there. I have good wifi connections both at home and work. Now, if I was the kind of user that didn't auto sync anything, I would probably end up using more battery life than I need to if I left wifi on all day, simply because I'm pumping juice into a radio that isn't being used.
However, I DO use a lot of auto sync functions, which means that my phone is actively using data a lot throughout the day. In this case, the battery drain due to the time in which wifi is left idle is out-weighed by the gain in battery life I get by the times my wifi is now being used instead a cell connection.
In a nutshell, as I said at the beginning, cellular data connection is more efficient at being idle than wifi (provided it's a good connection), and wifi is more efficient at being actively used (again, provided it's a good connection and the internet-side speed is sufficient).
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
My battery last far longer on wifi than 4g, not even close in my book.
Since I have wi-fi at work and home I can say there is a HUGE difference - especially since at home and work the 3G/4G signals are so weak that the phone burns quite a bit of battery just searching for a signal. Hoping that this will change as NV completes in the area but it might be the frequency that we're on is not too friendly with the newer building materials.
Yes, using wifi will save you more battery life than using your 3g/4g
Pastie13 said:
My battery last far longer on wifi than 4g, not even close in my book.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4g is a completely different animal than 3g when it comes to battery drain. So far when on 4g your battery life is sucked out of your phone. The email Sprint sends out I would safely say is comparing 3g to wifi.
That same tip is on Sprints website when you log into your account. It is on the right hand side.
As for battery life my findings have been WIFI uses less juice when the signal is good. 3G uses less juice when the throughput is good. So when I am on 3G in an area that has good speeds I can hit near 30 hours of battery.
I can do the same on WIFI when the WIFI signal is good, but if the WIFI signal is on the lower end the throughput slows since the quality has been lowered.
So in essence the better the throughput the better the battery, because when the phone wakes to check on any sync items setup the longer it takes to make that check the longer the CPU is at max and the more battery drain occurs. And I'm not talking signal strength for 3G since you'll get more drain on the battery in lesser areas because the phone is naturally going to have to boost the transmitter power. I'm talking best signal and crappy 3G network throughput. That is where the drain comes from.
I have tested this in my house with my WIFI and my Airave. On WIFI if I go outside my WIFI range is really bad and my battery drains a lot quicker. If I turn off the WIFI and use the Airave, which has a much higher transmitter power, I can get great battery. I have also seen this in over night testing. My WIFI is in the living room which is 5 walls away and the signal is pretty poor. If I leave my WIFI on over night and not charge my phone I loose 50% battery and when trying to use my phone for internet I get super bad throughput since I am on the edge of the signal. But turn off my WIFI and ride on the Airave I only loose 15% over night and the internet is great, but limited to 1.5m since it is 3G. So if you download a 1meg attachment. 3G takes 2 min and WIFI take 4 min then 3G will use less battery. This also goes vis versa. Whoever is maxing the CPU the longest is your battery killer because both are always on and always ready when they are selected.
Hope I didn't go into to much detail, but transmit power is not the big thing here it is throughput quality of the signal. The worst the throughput the more time it takes to transmit and thus more battery as the CPU is maxed till the job is complete.

Question Adaptive Connectivity

By default, the Adaptive Connectivity option is on to sense and handoff between connections to supposedly improve battery life. That said, I've noticed with the feature on, the Pixel 6 Pro stays on LTE, instead of 5G a lot more often than Samsung devices. I also noticed that Wi-Fi signal would trail off a bit when not actively in use (maybe a low power sleep mode?). I'm testing it with that feature turned off now to see if it makes much difference. Granted, 5G quality varies heavily, so there are times when 4G would be better. What are your experiences with this feature?
Battery life has been outstanding on the Pixel 6 Pro by the way.
It's going to be somewhat subjective people's carrier and location. I'm in Tampa on T-Mobile and pretty much 5G everywhere with and okay amount of 5G UC.
There's lots of discussion that turning off adaptive connectivity would help people's battery life especially in poor 5G reception areas.
I'm wondering if this "adaptive connectivity" setting also sends the network to sleep altogether when the device is idle long enough. I've lately had issues with some smart home app (smartlife/tuya) not executing scheduled tasks while the phone is idle. The app itself reports to check the network, which is always fine when i do (when the device is awake). That got me to check all the power and network related controls and this adaptive connectivity is the only really new control where Google also doesn't give any insight on how it actually works. It would be helpful to get an idea of that. Just there's basically no real information on the net.
Oh and besides, i feel the battery life of the Pixel 6 pro is pretty lame actually. I guess that also pretty much depends on network availability - i work in a rural area where the network isn't great (Mobile and WiFi both not great). As long as the device is off, battery drops at an acceptable, yet not great rate. But when i activate the phone, already the screen burns down the battery so fast it's annoying me (I've already set it to 60Hz permanently). Videos, navigating, even music - all that really chews away capacity really fast. That's one reason I'd rather keep Adaptive Connectivity on. I don't want even more drain.
Sneakyghost said:
I'm wondering if this "adaptive connectivity" setting also sends the network to sleep altogether when the device is idle long enough. I've lately had issues with some smart home app (smartlife/tuya) not executing scheduled tasks while the phone is idle. The app itself reports to check the network, which is always fine when i do (when the device is awake). That got me to check all the power and network related controls and this adaptive connectivity is the only really new control where Google also doesn't give any insight on how it actually works. It would be helpful to get an idea of that. Just there's basically no real information on the net.
Oh and besides, i feel the battery life of the Pixel 6 pro is pretty lame actually. I guess that also pretty much depends on network availability - i work in a rural area where the network isn't great (Mobile and WiFi both not great). As long as the device is off, battery drops at an acceptable, yet not great rate. But when i activate the phone, already the screen burns down the battery so fast it's annoying me (I've already set it to 60Hz permanently). Videos, navigating, even music - all that really chews away capacity really fast. That's one reason I'd rather keep Adaptive Connectivity on. I don't want even more drain.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My 6 pro lasts me pretty much the entire day with heavy usage. Before I charge it which is at around 9ish, I still have 17% left.
When I had it on I had lots of issues with the handoff from 5g/LTE and vice versa. Been turned off for the last 3 weeks and I just use LTE as preferred network with no issues. I do some gig work on the side and I can't be caught in the No Data limbo cuz the phone doesn't know what to do.
this is irrelevant but im comparing my wifi signal to my s21 ultra and it is pretty much the same. Same goes with my network speed
I played with adaptive connectivity and power and network settings a little more and got my SmartLife/Tuya to execute in background. It wasn't killed by adaptive connectivity, that does not seem to interfere with apps in this way at least. Seems to really rather deal with better handoffs between networks and not much more.

Categories

Resources