How come there is no Official AOKP Thread in the Development Section? - AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II

I see they just released Milestone 1 for t0lte (that is our phone, correct?)
I plan on flashing it when I get home tonight to see how stable it is.
http://aokp.co/supported-devices/?id=63&device=t0lte

We have a thread for it here in the general section.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2180990
No sense in making a thread in the development section unless one of the AOKP Devs opens it. You may only post a ROM in the development section if you developed it, ported it with permission, or have permission to do so.
Sent from The Bacon Pope's Galaxy Note 2

Related

[Q]AOKP ROM for A100?

Saw this on AOKP Github. This means we might get AOKP port to the A100 in the near future? I'm using AOKP ROM on my NS and I love it. Would be awesome if it's ported to the A100.
https://github.com/AOKP/android_device_acer_a100
Should have posted this in the Q&A but there is no Q&A sub-forum for this device. Sorry mods.

The Aeroevan [ROM] Unofficial CM9 for vivow (2012-09-05) Community Support Thread

Since Aeroevan's CM9 thread was closed, I felt the forum members might want a thread to continue community support for the ROM. Feel free to create community support threads such as this for all the other ROM threads which were closed because of lack of dev support.
To continue with the last post in the original thread found here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1561816&page=240
therreid said:
Also.....no Netflix with this one either....it just won't load.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? I haven't had any Netflix issues. Are you on the latest build?
Without any new developments this is more appropriate for the general section. If in the future you wish to start maintaining the ROM feel free to PM me and I can move this back for you.

Why are there 2 development threads?

This maybe a stupid question but back in the day the development threads were only one. There were no "original" development section, I'm wondering when did this happen and what's the difference between either thread? (Same thing with my previous phone the gnex) Thanks.
As far as I can tell, "original" section is for ROMs created entirely by the devs based on the official Android sources.
The "regular" dev section is for cooked ROMs based on existing ROMs like Samsung's releases.
HiKsFiles said:
As far as I can tell, "original" section is for ROMs created entirely by the devs based on the official Android sources.
The "regular" dev section is for cooked ROMs based on existing ROMs like Samsung's releases.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh that makes sense the original section is all AOSP and the other is based off Samsung GS3 official builds.

PACman Rom for Toro

I'm probably going to get hazed for posting in the dev section but I figured my question has to do with development. Well on the question. I just wanted to know if someone could point me in the direction of porting PACman rom from the maguro to the toro device? I used to love the features of the PACman on my Inc2 and would love to see this on my Nexus. If anybody knows of any tutorials or where I can get the source I would love to try building myself. If the mods feel this is in the wrong section go ahead and move to the right thread thanks.
dirtsky said:
I'm probably going to get hazed for posting in the dev section but I figured my question has to do with development. Well on the question. I just wanted to know if someone could point me in the direction of porting PACman rom from the maguro to the toro device? I used to love the features of the PACman on my Inc2 and would love to see this on my Nexus. If anybody knows of any tutorials or where I can get the source I would love to try building myself. If the mods feel this is in the wrong section go ahead and move to the right thread thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ill have this moved to Q&A.
Moved to Q&A. ALL questions belong in Q&A. Development forums are for development.
Found this if you didn't already: http://rootzwiki.com/topic/36532-rom11182012-pac-man-v161-unofficial/
I tried it, but needed the 4.2.2
This is based on 4.1.2
https://github.com/PAC-man
You may have to do a little bit of work to get it to build for toro, as it doesn't look like it is setup to officially support the toro.

[Q] Quick Question regarding Official CM10.2

I have done a couple of searches both on Google and within the forum without success. Maybe my search strings were to specific or not specific enough, but I do know that we don't have an 'Official' CM10.2 flo thread in the Original Android Dev section, while we have several 'unofficial' ones in the regular Android Dev section (I do love DJ's Kang ROM.)
Point is, why isn't there one? Are we still waiting for team CM to designate a person to head up project Flo/Razor? Just curious as to why it is still missing from our forum? And new flash addicts may not be aware of the get.cm link.
There is an official Nightly. There is no official stable release.

Categories

Resources