Develop Bugs

CM7.1 vs DoomKernel

Hi
I had CM7.1 installed for a couple of weeks now and I find it more reliable and a lot faster than DoomKernel (last installed was v10)
Has anyone got the same experience?
Has anyone tried FX044? Is it worth it?
Cheers
Alex

CM7 = ROM. Doomkernel = kernel. Or do you mean the kernel provided with cyanogen?
Sent from my LT15i using Tapatalk

Yes Stock Rom with DoomKernel vs CM7.1 (and it's Kernel)
Is it worth using DoomKernel for CM7?

SandroV1972 said:
Yes Stock Rom with DoomKernel vs CM7.1 (and it's Kernel)
Is it worth using DoomKernel for CM7?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It might be different with different users, DoomKernel offers lot more goverors and I/O Schedulers and CM7 is limited in that aspect. CM is just optimized for better battery performance no need for tweaking where DoomKernel you can tweak from low to extreme (i.e. Upto 2Ghz )

[Q] Kernel for cm10????

Fusion Kernel v3.4 or Fusion Kernel v3.5 or LuPuS-JBv2 or which kernel is the best for CM10? Thx

Fusion kernel 3.4 Non OC is the best for FXP CM10 latest version.
Look at my signature for the link to the CM10 fixes.

KartzXDA said:
Fusion kernel 3.4 Non OC is the best for FXP CM10 latest version.
Look at my signature for the link to the CM10 fixes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why??...for performance or battery save or what?....
anyone have try with Lupus?

I've tried lupus kernel... It's great regarding performance and tweaking cpu speeds... But battery life is lesser than stock....
Just my experience
Sent from my ultimate Arc S improved by jader

sakthi444 said:
I've tried lupus kernel... It's great regarding performance and tweaking cpu speeds... But battery life is lesser than stock....
Just my experience
Sent from my ultimate Arc S improved by jader
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have try and it's true...battery life is lesser than stock...but it's very good performance kernel

I have used lupus and fusion 3.5 with paranoid android jb rom and aokp jb rom. and i agree with most above for battery/performance issue. if you want battery go fusion also it is no less in performance as compared to lupus (IMHO). :good:

it's better Fusion v3.4 or 3.5???
...and why?

from what users say on forum fusion 3.4 is stable for youtube issues while 3.5 has some issues with youtube. rest i havent encountered problems with fusion 3.5 . i think you should try both yourself for better experiance .:good:

Try Lupus v2 with Supremacy Script v2, battery should be better.

Arc Fusion + Supremacy Script v1 is smooth and has good battery (3 days on mine)

is arc fusion 3.4 can use for the upcoming fxp cm10 release or only current release ?
is the battery in this kernel good ?

[Q][ARC] Overclocking kernel for stock ICS 4.0.4

Currently I'm using the stock ICS 4.0.4 (4.1.B.0.431) on my Xperia ARC LT15i with unlocked bootloader and thinking about overclock it, however, I couldn't find a custom kernel that gives me that possibility.
I've researched about DoomLord, Mesa and other ones but I only see custom works for ICS 4.0.3.
In case of anybody knows some good kernel for LT15 running ICS 4.0.4 I'd really apreciate if could tell me more about or indicate any research's source.
Thank you folks and sorry if this question is inappropriate.
Regards.

Hi,
There are many kernels for ICS in the development section. Most of them provides overclocking feature. You can try Arcknight, Xarc, Anzu and Lupus kernel. But based on experience with my arc, most of them have battery drain issues.
right now Im on advanced stock kernel

I always using doomkernel v5 or sega stock kernel without overclock. I dont want my arc blows up.
But it's up to you.
Sent from my LT18i using xda app-developers app

Thanks

[Q] question about kernel

about fxp 204, on arc s, is better lupus v6 kernel or fusion 4.3?

riku-dark said:
about fxp 204, on arc s, is better lupus v6 kernel or fusion 4.3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try them, maybe the following kernel is better

what kernel do you prefer, Lupus v8 or Turbo kernel?

I am trying to decide witch kernel i need out of these two. turbo kernel 3.1 or lupus v8
both have pros and cons
Turbo kernel 3.1 (PROS) can install mostly all android versions (GB and up) both stock and aokp
Turbo kernel 3.1 (CONS) has a small but annoying glitch, in stock ics based rom screen animations are broken
lupus v8 (PROS) does all its supposed to.
lupus v8 (CONS) Can only install akop roms, ALS is disabled

xdarkmario said:
I am trying to decide witch kernel i need out of these two. turbo kernel 3.1 or lupus v8
both have pros and cons
Turbo kernel 3.1 (PROS) can install mostly all android versions (GB and up) both stock and aokp
Turbo kernel 3.1 (CONS) has a small but annoying glitch, in stock ics based rom screen animations are broken
lupus v8 (PROS) does all its supposed to.
lupus v8 (CONS) Can only install akop roms, ALS is disabled
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Id say turbo has more pros and it's only con is in stock ics while lupus can't even use stock ics. But I think lupus has a little better performance though it'd hard to tell with jelly bean
Sent from my Xperia Play (r800x)

depends...
if you want performance and speed(which most jb and ics roms don't have)you should use the Turbo kernel.
but if you want android's features,such as voice typing(offline)and other things you can use both,but i recommend turbo again(it's my favorite kernel,i manged to have all of JB features on it,but unfortunately i deleted the JB rom(slimbean) by accident)

abdel12345 said:
Id say turbo has more pros and it's only con is in stock ics while lupus can't even use stock ics. But I think lupus has a little better performance though it'd hard to tell with jelly bean
Sent from my Xperia Play (r800x)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i ll say turbo kernel 3.1 its better overall..and its newer than lupus jbV8..performance wise its very similar..in some JB roms i have more antutu score with lupus,others with turbo..little difference in each case..but just for more options, i d go with turbo 3.1.