[CWM] Perm. CWM included in Stock boot.img - Galaxy Y GT-S5360 General

Hello everybody,
I don't know if this has been done already, but I couln't find it so I thought why not make a version of my own.
Next to WhiteXP i'm also working on a version of CyanogenMOD 7.2, but with a different approach.
In my oppinion before even trying to release something it's important to have a permanent and working version of instead of the stock recovery.
The difference between this phone and many other phones is the fact that the recovery is included in the boot.img file.
My own phone for example, a Samsung Galaxy S Plus, has a seperate standalone recovery.img.
Because I don't own this phone myself I hope another developer can test if this is working properly.
I didn't change the kernel or important boot files other than the recovery itself, so booting into android shouldn't be a problem and remember it's build upon the stock kernel for now.
Here is the downloadable boot.img: http://depositfiles.com/files/90ye57wtm
The kernel should be flashable through the existing CWM which is already posted in the forums with this file:
http://depositfiles.com/files/e21qacxo9
Hopefully somebody is willing to give me some feedback.
Greetings PsychoGame

Hello
Here I am again with a little update.
This version doesn't seem to work okay, it gets into a bootloop.
I will try to fix these problems at a later time.
Greetings
Psycho Game

Thanks...for your work merge CWM into stock kernel...:thumbup:
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app

Here's a little update of the work i'm doing right now.
As I already said I'm also working on a version of CyanogenMod myself.
The problem is not anymore the availability of the drivers, because BroadCom released their drivers to the public.
In my opinion the next bottleneck is the Kernel. I didn't own a Galaxy Y at first, but I recently bought one to make it easier to test different configurations.
My main phone is a Samsung Galaxy S Plus which already has a realy stable CM9 version, but also the kernel is already updated to version 3 from 2.6.35.14.
This is also my goal ultimatly, but the Galaxy Y uses RFS filesystem in combination with FSR. These are closed source modules from Samsung, which make it difficult to update kernels.
There is a known hack that you can alter the version in the make file of the kernel to 2.6.35.7 while it realy is patched up to 2.6.35.14, but i'm not very fond of such hacks.
I'm a daily linux user already since the year 2000 or so, and build many kernels for Linux computers from source. I can say I have good knowledge of the compilation proces and what's going on in the kernel.
Now back to what i'm doing at the moment:
I already converted the complete galaxy y to EXT4 file system, incl. the EFS partition, and yes I still have my IMEI data etc. so this is considered done [status: complete]
Next step is getting rid of the RFS & FSR kernel modules, which are proprietary [status: complete]
At the moment I'm busy updating the kernel to version 2.6.35.14 the proper way, so I have a stable base kernel to build CM on [status: WIP]
After this I will add CWM recovery to the updated kernel, and make sure everything works as it should, like ADB in recovery mode, formatting, and all these things. [Status: Planned]
When CWM recovery functions as it should work, the proces of building CWM into the Galaxy Y can begin [Status: WIP -> Stalled until kernel stable].
This is a little update on the things I have in mind.
If you like it, please post a comment, that also lifts my spirit in the lots of things that have to be done.
Greetings
Psycho Game

Related

[APP][ABANDONED] z4mod

Alright, here is the z4mod app at long last! This release needs a lot of testing for different devices still, so make sure you check the compatibility table below unless you know how to use Odin to flash back your original kernel. Thanks for helping to test this!
[size=+1]This is still in beta! If you know how to flash with Odin, please help test so all bugs can be found and fixed to allow for wider release![/size]
What is this?
Another lagfix. This one is a bit different from existing lagfixes though:
- Differences from OCLF: Uses native EXT/JFS instead of loopback mounts. Loopback mounts in linux can be a bit flakey at times, especially when they're on RFS. So this is generally better.
- Differences from lagfix kernels such as voodoo or sztupy's: These types of lagfixes are kernels compiled from GPL sources for specific devices. This can cause a number of issues, such as losing out on bug fixes in later Samsung kernels released after the GPL code, or differences in devices such as the I9000B, etc. z4mod also has (imo) a nicer design, in that it uses /etc/fstab for filesystem mounting, as well as keeping the convert scripts outside the kernel. It should also work across ALL (or many?) Samsung devices without changes!
How do I use this?
Install the app. Click the buttons. It should all just work. Let me know of any issues or complications! This is still in testing!
Device/firmware compatibility table
Samsung Galaxy S Devices
Stock Samsung
I9000 Stock Samsung 2.2 : WORKING
I9000 Stock Samsung 2.1 : NOT TESTED
I9000B Stock Samsung 2.2 : NOT TESTED
I9000B Stock Samsung 2.1 : NOT TESTED
I9000T Stock Samsung 2.2 : NOT TESTED
I9000T Stock Samsung 2.1 : NOT TESTED
I9000M Stock Samsung 2.2 : NOT TESTED
I9000M Stock Samsung 2.1 : NOT TESTED
Captivate Stock Samsung 2.2 : NOT TESTED
Captivate Stock Samsung 2.1 : NOT TESTED
Vibrant Stock Samsung 2.2 : NOT TESTED
Vibrant Stock Samsung 2.1 : NOT TESTED
Epic Stock Samsung 2.2 : NOT TESTED
Epic Stock Samsung 2.1 : NOT TESTED
Fascinate Stock Samsung 2.2 : NOT TESTED
Fascinate Stock Samsung 2.1 : NOT TESTED
Stock Japanese Docomo Galaxy S (SC-02B) : WORKING
Stock SHW-M110S (Korean SGS) : WORKING
Custom Firmwares
Any custom firmware that uses a stock kernel works as the stock kernel in the table above
Custom kernels that make use of changed filesystems or boot up scripts are unlikely to work at this time. Emphasis is on stock kernels currently.
Custom Kernels
BLN (backlight notification) custom kernel for GT-I9000 works
Voodoo kernels do not work
Kernels with heavily modified boot procedures such as rooted Vibrant kernels do not work
CFRoot kernel does not work.
DamianGto's kernels work
Other Samsung Devices
NOT TESTED
More info on z4mod
http://www.sgscompilebox.dreamhosters.com/about.html
Source Code
http://github.com/z4/z4mod
V0.9.2 Changelog
Fix for EXT2->RFS Conversion. Please update to this app version before using this conversion.
Other small bug fixes.
Conversion page now has scrolling text informing you of progress and any errors.
V0.9.3 Changelog
Critical: Upload kernel now passes binary MIME type to prevent corrupt kernels
Fixes for text in conversion screen.
Fix for 'mmcblk0p2' always being chosen for /data, even on devices that use 'mmcblk0p1'
Bug fixes for UI
Donations
Donate link is available at https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webs...=PP-DonationsBF:btn_donateCC_LG.gif:NonHosted
quick question I need to disable vodoo before using this right ?
anyways im running vibrant rom ( axura ) on my rogers captivate ( i896 )
testing now
DAGr8 said:
quick question I need to disable vodoo before using this right ?
anyways im running vibrant rom ( axura ) on my rogers captivate ( i896 )
testing now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This probably won't work if you have a Voodoo kernel installed. The Voodoo kernel is unlikely to be patchable, since it's not native RFS, and does not use /etc/fstab.
RyanZA said:
- Differences from OCLF: Uses native EXT/JFS instead of loopback mounts. Loopback mounts in linux can be a bit flakey at times, especially when they're on RFS. So this is generally better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a Vibrant and this is why I have avoided using the OCLF in the past. Many ROMs don't even need a lag fix. However, with that issue gone, I'll at least try it and report back on it.
RyanZA said:
This probably won't work if you have a Voodoo kernel installed. The Voodoo kernel is unlikely to be patchable, since it's not native RFS, and does not use /etc/fstab.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey I forgot to mention I had flashed setiron's reoriented kernel on it , so yea result is could not patch kernel ..
I guess i have more test to do. But right now Im stuck with 0.12 problem.
I did test it
I knew it would not work.;-)
The thing i was testing was if you could do this on a kernel that has note been patched. Well you can press the button and the phone restart. I guess it try but failed and restart again.
Can you do a check on the kernel so you know its patched?
I thinking of ways happens if people try every kernel without the patch. It should point them to the website.
Instead of restarting the phone.
Sent from GT-I9000 jpo. My own kernel for z4mod and with 342MB Ram
can i use this with speedmod kernel?
DamianGto said:
I guess i have more test to do. But right now Im stuck with 0.12 problem.
I did test it
I knew it would not work.;-)
The thing i was testing was if you could do this on a kernel that has note been patched. Well you can press the button and the phone restart. I guess it try but failed and restart again.
Can you do a check on the kernel so you know its patched?
I thinking of ways happens if people try every kernel without the patch. It should point them to the website.
Instead of restarting the phone.
Sent from GT-I9000 jpo. My own kernel for z4mod and with 342MB Ram
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It checks for a /z4mod/z4version file to determine if it's been patched already. If you are using an earlier patched z4mod kernel that doesn't have that file, then it won't work right. If you start with a stock samsung kernel then it should work fine.
specialex said:
can i use this with speedmod kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Feel free to give it a shot, but the current emphasis in this 0.9 app release is on patching and lagfixing the stock samsung kernels. Once that is all working and bugfree across devices, then I will look more at supporting custom kernels. At present, any custom kernel that does not change the initramfs (in particular, the /init binary and init.rc mount options) too heavily should work fine.
Hey Ryan,
I patched the stock Vibrant JK2 kernel and it patched successful, however the conversion to ext2 did not work. Said it worked, rebooted, but I was still on RFS.
Whitehawkx said:
Hey Ryan,
I patched the stock Vibrant JK2 kernel and it patched successful, however the conversion to ext2 did not work. Said it worked, rebooted, but I was still on RFS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for testing!
Could you upload the z4mod.log file in your sdcard? /sdcard/z4mod.log
Okay. Then its just because the bug in the latest z4build then.
That's why it tried to apply the change.
Z4ziggy is working on that problem
Hope he will solve that soon. Right know Im on stock filsystem with my new kernel. Lol.
Kind of fun to compare them.
Sent from GT-I9000 jpo. My own kernel for z4mod and with 342MB Ram
RyanZA said:
Thanks for testing!
Could you upload the z4mod.log file in your sdcard? /sdcard/z4mod.log
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just looked and there isn't one there.
Whitehawkx said:
I just looked and there isn't one there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hah... Okay that's pretty strange. What method did you use to root btw? Perhaps it's a busybox conflict of some type.
RyanZA said:
Hah... Okay that's pretty strange. What method did you use to root btw? Perhaps it's a busybox conflict of some type.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm the rom/kernel I flashed came pre-rooted. Now that I think about it, I was using the stock JK2 kernel but it has a custom init script to allow the use custom boot animations. Could this be effecting the conversion process by chance? Anytime I manually root though I use OCLF from the market.
Hey RyanZA,
I see that there is a list of devices in the first post but I dont see a listing for the GT-i9000M specifically. I see the i9000, i9000B and i9000T but no "M". Is there a reason for this? Is the i9000M considered in the generic i9000 family? Also...
A bit off topic here but I am curious to know if I root using z4root and need to unroot for warranty purposes, will it remove ALL traces that it had been rooted including Busybox and Superuser app?
I know that Samsung has issued a memo stating that if a phone shows up rooted to a service center that the warranty will be voided and Id really like to try this rooting method.
Also, as you are probably aware, the i9000M here in Canada has issues with internal sd card failures and I am curious to know if just rooting with z4root will possibly kill my internal sd?
Thanks...
Flashed my Epic using the DK05 2.2 Rom, ran Z4mod, get error: zimage test failed when i try and patch the kernal.
RyanZA said:
Feel free to give it a shot, but the current emphasis in this 0.9 app release is on patching and lagfixing the stock samsung kernels. Once that is all working and bugfree across devices, then I will look more at supporting custom kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
should probably put this on OP , less hassle probably .
if nobody else test it on the cappy ill flash to stock just to test ..
@DamianGto:
The problem is with CWM recovery - it's busybox-tar is not working properly.
I think I found a way to overcome this and I updated the git, so now CWM option should be working again.
Whitehawkx said:
Hey Ryan,
I patched the stock Vibrant JK2 kernel and it patched successful, however the conversion to ext2 did not work. Said it worked, rebooted, but I was still on RFS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you could paste the contents of the following 2 files we might learn more:
/z4mod/log/init
/sdcard/z4mod.log
Just installed on my device (GT-I9000 with official JPA just released today in Thailand)
It worked fine. I got 1730 from quadrant.
Thanks for your excellent job. ^__^

[DEV][4.4] CM11 Development - DEVELOPERS ONLY

As a proof of concept I compiled Kit Kat for our Acer Inconia. It needs a new build of CWM in order to flash. I have not been able to boot up CWM that I compiled so anyone here that has built recovery on here before try to build latest CWM and/or TWRP then we can try out this KitKat build to see if it boots or not. It may need some kernel patches. It's using pio_maski's jb-mr2 trees that I modified for 4.4 for a100 (note: I haven't uploaded yet and won't unless it boots).
Download: http://d-h.st/aKr
What you can do to help:
1. Compile the latest TWRP or CWM and post if it boots. Only do this if you've done it before; I'm not going to teach because it is out of my knowledge why CWM won't boot. If you come across any errors and don't know how to fix PM me or post here I'll help you fix it.
2. NOTHING can be done until we have a working (latest) recovery.
Sources:
Device: https://github.com/awid777/android_device_acer_a100 (cm10.2 branch)
Note for the sources: This isn't the source I used to compile the initial build. However, they are almost identical. The credits for the sources for the ROM go to @pio-masaki for his device and commons trees and prebuilt kernel. I would post the sources I used but I never uploaded them because I ended up deleting them early on as I prefer to use a single device tree. All my commits will now be posted to the listed source.
awidawad said:
As a proof of concept I compiled Kit Kat for our Acer Inconia. It needs a new build of CWM in order to flash. I have not been able to boot up CWM that I compiled so anyone here that has built recovery on here before try to build latest CWM and/or TWRP then we can try out this KitKat build to see if it boots or not. It may need some kernel patches. It's using pio_maski's jb-mr2 trees that I modified for 4.4 for a100 (note: I haven't uploaded yet and won't unless it boots).
Download: Pending upload.
What you can do to help:
1. Compile the latest TWRP or CWM and post if it boots. Only do this if you've done it before; I'm not going to teach because it is out of my knowledge why CWM won't boot. If you come across any errors and don't know how to fix PM me or post here I'll help you fix it.
2. NOTHING can be done until we have a working (latest) recovery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am not a "DEV", however I have a good amount of talent with photoshop and have some self taught coding experience with linux and html5. I also am willing to learn/eager to learn. I know you mentioned you don't want to teach. Just know if you point me in the direction I am willing to do the work on my end to get the knowledge and apply it. I have been playing with this tablet and working on a hybrid kitkat look alike using 4.1.2 as my base. I tried using 4.3 and applying 4.4 goodies to it. Didn't work that well. The 4.3 Jellytime was a bit quirky at times and didn't seem stable as a daily driver. I have put together a couple new boot animations to compliment kitkat already. I have also modified Arora installer with a very good kitkat theme. I have used it several times to verify it works correctly. I can provide that if wanted. I am waiting for a stable build and willing to help where I can. I plan on installing this tablet into my dash in the very near future. Once that is done, unfortunately I will only be able to help with themes and basic items that don't require the tablet all the time. I have contemplated having the ability to remove the tablet whenever I leave the car so I guess we will see when I get there. Apologize for the long post.
po8pimp said:
I am not a "DEV", however I have a good amount of talent with photoshop and have some self taught coding experience with linux and html5. I also am willing to learn/eager to learn. I know you mentioned you don't want to teach. Just know if you point me in the direction I am willing to do the work on my end to get the knowledge and apply it. I have been playing with this tablet and working on a hybrid kitkat look alike using 4.1.2 as my base. I tried using 4.3 and applying 4.4 goodies to it. Didn't work that well. The 4.3 Jellytime was a bit quirky at times and didn't seem stable as a daily driver. I have put together a couple new boot animations to compliment kitkat already. I have also modified Arora installer with a very good kitkat theme. I have used it several times to verify it works correctly. I can provide that if wanted. I am waiting for a stable build and willing to help where I can. I plan on installing this tablet into my dash in the very near future. Once that is done, unfortunately I will only be able to help with themes and basic items that don't require the tablet all the time. I have contemplated having the ability to remove the tablet whenever I leave the car so I guess we will see when I get there. Apologize for the long post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is not a port, thus doesn't need modification. It is compiled (built) from source and the work that needs to be done is in the source code so it can be compiled properly and work without modification
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Development
awidawad said:
As a proof of concept I compiled Kit Kat for our Acer Inconia. It needs a new build of CWM in order to flash. I have not been able to boot up CWM that I compiled so anyone here that has built recovery on here before try to build latest CWM and/or TWRP then we can try out this KitKat build to see if it boots or not. It may need some kernel patches. It's using pio_maski's jb-mr2 trees that I modified for 4.4 for a100 (note: I haven't uploaded yet and won't unless it boots).
Download: [url]http://d-h.st/aKr[/url]
What you can do to help:
1. Compile the latest TWRP or CWM and post if it boots. Only do this if you've done it before; I'm not going to teach because it is out of my knowledge why CWM won't boot. If you come across any errors and don't know how to fix PM me or post here I'll help you fix it.
2. NOTHING can be done until we have a working (latest) recovery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the link and quick response, will take a look through some of that stuff and see if there is anything I can do to help. Also I noticed while I was typing the first one you put up a download... Did you get it to boot. I downloaded and tried using TWRP and was unsuccessful. I tried a couple times to make sure it copied over from the computer correctly. Still the same result.
4.4 updates different. Latest cwn will flash it. Maybe there's an easy way to do this
Sent from my SPH-L710 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Ok so I am stuck right now. I spent a couple hours building an environment and started compiling from source. I am stuck at this point:
$ source build/envsetup.sh
$ breakfast a700
Where a700 is, should be a100. I get errors when doing this because CyanogenMod does not have the device in it's file system. Whoever has successfully done this, please advise. I am over half way with this and would like to complete the build. I have about 20gbs of data sitting on my cpu waiting to compile this so the sooner we can find the solution the better. Thanks in advance.
Need help solving this to move further... There might be a work around, however I have never done this and I am stuck.
Wait till tonight. I'll post my code.
Sent from my One SV using Tapatalk
awidawad said:
Wait till tonight. I'll post my code.
Sent from my One SV using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds good. I spent a good part of 3 hours compiling a master build of Kitkat which was complete prior to me leaving for work this morning, however my daughter kicked the power strip under the desk and shut everything down. I will try and find a little time tonight to recompile.
Am I missing something?
Sent from my SPH-L710 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
TWRP Version?
Is this TWRP new enough for your needs if not what is the newest version you are aware of
a100 TWRP 2.6.1.0 windows installer: as far as I can tell the Twrp image is based of linuxsociety's/GodMachine's work I know for sure the installer is his
http://d-h.st/Rfm
I have flashed this and all seems to work well
I also took the 2.6.1.0 from the above linked installer and put it into a flashable.zip that originaly contained GM's 2.2.2.1 TWRP
I updated the script to show the proper version as well attatched below
AngryManMLS Is responsible for both 2.6.1.0 and 2.6.3.0, "if I am not mistaken"?
His windows/Linux installers can be found here: http://www.androidfilehost.com/?a=show&w=files&flid=9577
and Here:http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=47555451&postcount=109 For 2.6.3.0
I also invited AngryManMLS to build the TWRP needed for this project So We'll have to wait and see if he can help "Break US OFF A PEICE OF SOME KIT-KAT---- Iconia???!!!!!!"
I just want to correct something. The only thing I have done was updating the Windows and Linux installers for TWRP. I have no responsibility with the compiling of TWRP itself. At this point we're waiting for the TWRP folks themselves to fix whatever issues that lie with Kit Kat 4.4. I don't know what to say beyond that. Sorry.
AngryManMLS said:
I just want to correct something. The only thing I have done was updating the Windows and Linux installers for TWRP. I have no responsibility with the compiling of TWRP itself. At this point we're waiting for the TWRP folks themselves to fix whatever issues that lie with Kit Kat 4.4. I don't know what to say beyond that. Sorry.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Bad I shouldn't have assumed do you know who is doing the compiling?
I'm going to go ahead and compile TWRP. I've educated myself on the a100 (I've never done programming on this device or any other Tegra based device... Used to Qualcomm and HTC) hopefully it will work. Current TWRP branch on GitHub is twrp2.7 and has all KitKat changes in it. I'll have a build tomorrow morning. Tonight I have to finish my essays and other homework. I'll let you all know if recovery boots or not. If it does boot, I'll go ahead and attempt installing and booting KitKat
hello! I wonder if owners will share files as well as the vendor, I've wanted to compile pacman for this tablet but can not find the source code! Thanks in advance!
josegalre said:
hello! I wonder if owners will share files as well as the vendor, I've wanted to compile pacman for this tablet but can not find the source code! Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Once I have time, which won't be until later tonight. You could use www.github.com/pio-masaki too. Use the jb-mr2 branch for 4.3
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=41990263&postcount=1
awidawad said:
Once I have time, which won't be until later tonight. You could use www.github.com/pio-masaki too. Use the jb-mr2 branch for 4.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hardslog said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=41990263&postcount=1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you! I have to have fun these days!
Well I compiled latest TWRP it didn't work it has same errors. I'll take this up with Dees_Troy. Because when I place the same trees and TWRP into the cm-11 source it won't compile, whereas it compiles fine in cm-10 source. When I manually fix compilation errors it compiles but when flashed it doesn't boot. Same story with CWM
Sent from my One SV using Tapatalk
awidawad said:
Well I compiled latest TWRP it didn't work it has same errors. I'll take this up with Dees_Troy. Because when I place the same trees and TWRP into the cm-11 source it won't compile, whereas it compiles fine in cm-10 source. When I manually fix compilation errors it compiles but when flashed it doesn't boot. Same story with CWM
Sent from my One SV using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try compiling cwm then.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

[Q] SELinux custom kernel for SM-T900 (pro 12.2)

Hi,
I've successfully rooted my UK galaxy tab pro 12.2 SM-T900 (using a P900 img as the T900 one bricked it), I'd like to try running linux via chroot but I think I need a custom kernel to set SELinux to permissive.
Since there don't seem to be any in existence I think I need to build one from source as described here (I can't post links):
graemehill.ca/compiling-permissive-android-kernel/
The build # on my device is T900XXUANI1
however on the Samsung open source site this particular version is not listed.
opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=sub&sub=F&searchValue=T900
I'm not sure if they're supposed to be the same thing - Should these versions match? Will I break something if I download the source for T900XXUANB5 and compile that or is that the right version to download?
Thanks
RealZogger said:
Hi,
I've successfully rooted my UK galaxy tab pro 12.2 SM-T900 (using a P900 img as the T900 one bricked it), I'd like to try running linux via chroot but I think I need a custom kernel to set SELinux to permissive.
Since there don't seem to be any in existence I think I need to build one from source as described here (I can't post links):
graemehill.ca/compiling-permissive-android-kernel/
The build # on my device is T900XXUANI1
however on the Samsung open source site this particular version is not listed.
opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=sub&sub=F&searchValue=T900
I'm not sure if they're supposed to be the same thing - Should these versions match? Will I break something if I download the source for T900XXUANB5 and compile that or is that the right version to download?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can use bonuzzz's Custom PRO-VTFB. But if you really want to create your own, you can use the B5 kernel. However, that kernel has been followed by two firmware upgrades.
Thanks, so there's no problem using the p900 kernel on the t900? It's not something I've ever done before and I don't really know how much difference there is between various kernels
RealZogger said:
Thanks, so there's no problem using the p900 kernel on the t900? It's not something I've ever done before and I don't really know how much difference there is between various kernels
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You might loose the automatic screen rotation, but that's the only difference. I use it as an alternative to cm-11, together with bonuzzz's Custom ROM 1.01 the most debloated TW ROM available. There is also a cm-11 kernel with enabled VT, but same thing here you will most likely loose the auto rotation.
If anyone is interested, i sent a request to samsung via their open source website on the day I posted this thread, asking for the XXUANI1 source. Got an email back today to say it's now available on the website. I haven't tried doing anything with it yet though!

WorkAround: MultiRom + Kernel Panic on Secondary Rom

Not sure if im posting in correct area,
If Posted in wrong area, my Bad..
Ever since MultiRom come out for D851, People have been experiencing Kernel panics with the latest updates from the CM Sources. (Not everyone, But Most)
The method I used below has worked with no problems with me. I cant say it will work with everyone. But it worked for me..
I know installing a Full Kernel ZIP file on secondary rom can either take 45 mins or longer, or not even work at all. (My Experience.)
But the method listed below, only took 5 secs and worked perfectly..
Now I just wanted to post a work around for the people that are experiencing Kernel Panics when using MultiRom..
Example: you install CM-12 as a secondary rom, Reboot and it crashes with Kernel Panic,
Work around: This awesome Kernel: Optimized SM-4.9.3 Kernel V2.2 for D855/D851/D850/LS990 http://forum.xda-developers.com/lg-g3/development/kernel-optimized-sm-4-9-3-kernel-t2976049
Take that kernel and unzip file. Then in Multi rom settings in TWRP-MultiRom goto list roms.. Pick the Rom with the kernel panic and Then remove Boot image..
click on the add boot image now.. and then goto the unziped kernel from above, Find the boot.img and click on it.. it will add it.. takes only a few secs.
Reboot.. Kernel panic is now gone..... (Becides, that Kernel works great)..
Note: that above example is for Lollipop only.. I havent tested it with any other kernels.. Most kernels that I unziped had that bump stuff listed for the locked bootloaders.
and no correctly listed boot.img So.. it wouldnt work...
You can also Make a Backup of your current working boot image and then flash that into it, Havent testing it like that, but should work the same.
The other work around I heard posted is:
Install to primary ROM then move to secondary rom.
Thank you for this. I have been flashing RIN kernel after any cm12 I've installed since installing MultiROM. Seems to work too, but the hour long wait to flash a 7mb kernel really bugs me.
Next time I flash a cm12 as secondary I'll give this a go.
Eliminater74 said:
Not sure if im posting in correct area,
If Posted in wrong area, my Bad..
Ever since MultiRom come out for D851, People have been experiencing Kernel panics with the latest updates from the CM Sources. (Not everyone, But Most)
The method I used below has worked with no problems with me. I cant say it will work with everyone. But it worked for me..
I know installing a Full Kernel ZIP file on secondary rom can either take 45 mins or longer, or not even work at all. (My Experience.)
But the method listed below, only took 5 secs and worked perfectly..
Now I just wanted to post a work around for the people that are experiencing Kernel Panics when using MultiRom..
Example: you install CM-12 as a secondary rom, Reboot and it crashes with Kernel Panic,
Work around: This awesome Kernel: Optimized SM-4.9.3 Kernel V2.2 for D855/D851/D850/LS990 http://forum.xda-developers.com/lg-g3/development/kernel-optimized-sm-4-9-3-kernel-t2976049
Take that kernel and unzip file. Then in Multi rom settings in TWRP-MultiRom goto list roms.. Pick the Rom with the kernel panic and Then remove Boot image..
click on the add boot image now.. and then goto the unziped kernel from above, Find the boot.img and click on it.. it will add it.. takes only a few secs.
Reboot.. Kernel panic is now gone..... (Becides, that Kernel works great)..
Note: that above example is for Lollipop only.. I havent tested it with any other kernels.. Most kernels that I unziped had that bump stuff listed for the locked bootloaders.
and no correctly listed boot.img So.. it wouldnt work...
You can also Make a Backup of your current working boot image and then flash that into it, Havent testing it like that, but should work the same.
The other work around I heard posted is:
Install to primary ROM then move to secondary rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or you can try the tootsie-pop test kernel. I implemented the multirom patch into it tonight. If everything works fine it'll be been bumped into the stable kernel and be included with bliss pop and Resurrection remix ROMs.
aclegg2011 said:
Or you can try the tootsie-pop test kernel. I implemented the multirom patch into it tonight. If everything works fine it'll be been bumped into the stable kernel and be included with bliss pop and Resurrection remix ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes from what I have tested it works with any Compatible flashable Kernel that unzips and has a boot.img..
The above kernel that I listed on post #1 is Stable but is overclockable, If you dont want that.. Then dont use that one, It was only listed as an Example.
I use that kernel with no problems.. I dont OC my phone, but its nice to have the option to do so.
Ill test out the tootie-pop kernel the next time I feel like messing with my phone.
Now isnt a good time, Im sick, and I have already messed up my linux system and my windows system (windows 10 Enterprise build 9926).. Had to do a fresh install on windows.. my linux doesnt want to let me mount my own drives in gnome.. Says I dont have access do to some error, But I am running Ubuntu Vivid 15.04.. so thats to be expected..
So touching my phone isnt a good idea right now.. I might just end up blowing it up the way my luck is going.
Thanks to the OP. This was a quick and simple fix to a frustrating issue.
Sent from my LG-D851
After doing a little research, and finding out that the MultiRom is pretty much dead. I decided to delete it all together and stick with the one rom that seemed
very stable and likable for me. I wont say what rom that was as to respect all developers on this forum.. So I stopped all testing and experiments dealing with MultiRom..
If the Developer once again decides to post updates and fixes. I will again. try it.. but for now.. I will no longer post any workarounds or help with this MultiRom section anymore...
As you know that thread was closed in the ROM Development section..

[ROM][AOSP][7.1/8.1 EXP][K3.4][Repartition] Unlegacy Android Project

The Unlegacy Android Project
TF201 | TF300T/TG/TL | TF700T​
Introduction
Unlegacy Android started out as the OMAP4-AOSP Project. It was created in late 2015 in order to maintain a clean and organized place for pure AOSP support for various OMAP4 devices, such as the Galaxy Nexus and the Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 series. Over time this evolved to support more than just these devices, but still maintains its roots of supporting "legacy" devices that no longer receive "official" updates: hence Unlegacy Android was born. In our opinion, these ROMs are how the official updates would look.
On top of AOSP, we only include changes which are necessary to support the hardware, be secure, and get acceptable performance. Current features for the Asus Transformer Series include:
- Linux kernel 3.4.y (currently 3.4.113)
- BFQ IO scheduler (official kernel 3.4 release), set up so GUI processes have the highest priority
- F2FS support from kernel 4.9 (for /data and /cache)
Installation
You must have NvFlash backup. It is MANDATORY!
You need to use modified TWRP recovery that works with updated F2FS. If you're planning to install GApps, be sure to read the second post!
Problems
Non working/Known bugs:
- GPS; - need a device owner to configure!
- Camera (both);
- Dock special keys (top row);
- Modem on TG and TL;
- GUI crashes; - occure less often
Currently, no one from Unlegacy Team, has TF300T/TG/TL device. Help in developing or device donation would be highly appreciated.
Downloads
See: http://builds.unlegacy-android.org. Our automated builds ensure that we always have the latest Android security patches merged in, without having to manually start and upload builds Else is enclosed in downloads.
Features?
There isn't much to say here - this is AOSP, if you install GApps, you pretty much get the same thing that's running on the Nexus devices (see the second post). The aim of this project is to create a fast and stable ROM - although, one could use Xposed (or similar) to add extra features.
As usual, feedback is appreciated
Contacts
You may join Telegram development group, where all fresh staff is published and tests are made.
XDA:DevDB Information
Unlegacy Android Project, ROM for the Asus Transformer TF300T
Contributors
Clamor, Ziyan
Source Code: https://github.com/Unlegacy-Android
ROM OS Version: 7.x Nougat
ROM Kernel: Linux 3.4.x
ROM Firmware Required: Bootloader 4.2 JB
Based On: AOSP
Version Information
Status: Beta
Created 2018-02-18
Last Updated 2018-10-17
Installation gide (for those who uses F2FS)
Before installing ROM you need to update your current recovery with this TWRP, else you will get a bootloop with next format from fastboot. Install zip from your current recovery and reboot into your current system. Than boot into new recovery and install ROM (with factory reset).
Currently 3.4 kernel isn't stable enough for daily use. You may use updated 3.1 _that16 kernel, it works fine with this ROM. To make wifi work with _that16 kernel just move nvram_nh615.txt from system/etc to data/misc/wifi and rename to nvram.txt
You may use KatKiss 7.1 if you want, but you must flash a _that16 kernel every time after flashing KatKiss ROM. Else you will get a bootloop with next format from fastboot.
If you want to go back to ordinary TWRP, you need to make a format from fastboot, flash TWRP and make formats from there as well.
REPARTITION and TREBLE
I worked on this for few last weeks to make it stable and simple enough to any user to install this update. As usual NvFlash is MANDATORY! TF300TG/TL users shouldn't use this as it can harm your tablet.
So, UA_Bootloader.zip includes latest JB4.2 10.6.1.27.5 bootloader, modified TWRP [email protected] from Downloads section and my new partition table. It's main benefits are /system partition increased to 1GB and /vendor partition. This means that we may install bigger gapps packages and support of TF's may be extended plus having /vendor partition gives us at least hardware support for Project Treble, even if there is no 8.1 builds currently.
Before installation copy everything from tablet on PC, else all you data will be lost! To install this update just install it via TWPR and when flashing is finished press reboot into system. Than wait till blue line gets to the end and tablet reboots. Tablet will than stuck into ASUS screen with Device is Unlocked sign in top left corner. Than reboot manually into recovery and format /system to ext4; /cache to ext4 or f2fs; /data to ext4 or f2fs and you are good to go.
New partition table is compatible with all existing ROMs for TF's. If you flash ROM with system in .img file you need after flash into recovery do Wipe -> System -> Advanced Wipe -> Change or resize partition -> Resize filesystem. If you want to restore 4.2 state you can flash Stock or Bootloader 4.2 attached in Downloads section.
How is this project going? and why you choose android 7.1? instead of the new android 8.0? because i would definitely want to help with a android 8.0/8.1 rom
androidjel said:
How is this project going? and why you choose android 7.1? instead of the new android 8.0? because i would definitely want to help with a android 8.0/8.1 rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
8.1 is my next step, it'll be easy to reach. But to have good experience with 8.1 we need a stable fully functional 7.1 build.
Clamor said:
8.1 is my next step, it'll be easy to reach. But to have good experience with 8.1 we need a stable fully functional 7.1 build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah okay thats clear, a other question i want to try this rom but there are no downloads.
I want to test for you if you want? :good:
androidjel said:
Ah okay thats clear, a other question i want to try this rom but there are no downloads.
I want to test for you if you want? :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All needed files you can find in Downloads tab on top of this thread
Clamor said:
8.1 is my next step, it'll be easy to reach. But to have good experience with 8.1 we need a stable fully functional 7.1 build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Clamor said:
All needed files you can find in Downloads tab on top of this thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see tnx, what do you want to know or what do you want to have tested to help you?
and Btw which TWRP is that? i have the last one already installed.
androidjel said:
I see tnx, what do you want to know or what do you want to have tested to help you?
and Btw which TWRP is that? i have the last one already installed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing, you may install Rom to see current project progress (If you have TF300T there will be no sound). For further developement test device is needed, or a developer with TF300T(better solution). Mostly all major functions are fixed, see buglist, and 3.4 works on all transformers on Tegra 3.
That is KANG TWRP with support of updated F2FS
TF300T users, if you are interested in further developement, please help me with debuging sound driver. I need a tester, with TF300T and some free time.
Clamor said:
TF300T users, if you are interested in further developement, please help me with debuging sound driver. I need a tester, with TF300T and some free time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am more than willing to be a tester if you want. Heck, I will even find a cheap TF300T to load only this on. My mornings are relatively free as my business doesn't pick up till noon or so. Just PM me specifics of what you need. Any more development for our tablets is a blessing as far as I am concerned
I would love to help debugging, testing and developing. I'm currently in possession of a tf300t with dock and an me301t. Do you think it will be possible to port this to the ME301t?
@gs-crash-24-7 please write me in PM. Actually ME301t was supported at early stages of 3.4 bringup. I fully excluded it from board since I couldn't test it and Memopad parts made transformers board really messy. I had enough problems with TF stuff at that moment.
3.4 kernel porting and repartitioning before were just a dream, but now they are real. Memopad bringup depends only on your interest in it.
Oreo 8.1
Yesterday I have quickly build 8.1 ROM for transformers. There doesn't work almost anything and I won't have excess to my TF201 for a while to fix stuff Rom can be booted with same requirements as N roms. Here is first build. Please don't post any issues/logs here from O for now. I know already about all major issues.
I have some good news. Here is mostly working Oreo build with issues from N + non working bt. I'm still working on fixing staff so this isn't last build.
P.S. Remove system/lib/hw/bluetooth.default.so to avoid constant bt crash
Any possibility of sharing the 3.4 kernel supporting the ME301t...I have that little bugger and the latest software updates from my TV provider and Netflis like programs are all KK dead for the most part. Having unlegacy on the Me301t would be a dream come true and would avoid trashing this one and getting a new one just because I want to see some shows or TV. Thank you for your work. I will assist to the best of my knowledge.
@AlphaDivxMovies nothing impossible, but first of all, I have no MemoPad and it's hardware isn't that close as my Prime is with TF300T. Second is that I put huge amount of my time and afforts in porting transformer board so I have no desire at all to do this once more time, I can help with suggestions but actual development will lie on your shoulders.
P.S. To just boot rom atm you would need only a kernel port, ROM is mostly compatible. Almost all drivers memopad uses are already included. You may contact @gs-crash-24-7 as well, he has memopad and if he agrees, than work in pair is much more simple.
@Clamor , Where is the oreo version? https://builds.unlegacy-android.org/ here i could only find the 7.1.2 version.
The other downloads in this post dont work anymore (oreo).
@androidjel sure, since there are no stable enough builds on O and even N builds aren't for everyday use with 3.4 kernel. I didn't launch O builds for a long time.
Clamor said:
@androidjel sure, since there are no stable enough builds on O and even N builds aren't for everyday use with 3.4 kernel. I didn't launch O builds for a long time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@Clamor But could you launch a O build again? maybe i could try to help, I have some time to do that at the moment.

Categories

Resources