Related
Hi, I've installed GProfile on my phone twice - it works well enough, but each time I've had massive battery drain - is there anything I can change/anyone else had a similar experience?
Thanks.
Are you using the latest version? I read this was fixed on a later version. Also do you use anything like SEVEN or any data intensive applications?
Thanks for replying.
Not sure about which version I'm using, I THINK it's 6.2? Not running any intensive apps though.
How can I add some ringTones to GProfile???
Hi friends...
I would like to add some new RingTones from my PC to my Pocket PC.
I can copy them to /documents/ringtones and it's working for WM6.5 to add new ringtones to windows...
but I can't add them to my Gprofile (G Profile) menu and I can't choose my favorite ringtone in Gprofile.
I'm using Gprofile 1.1 built 1123 (the last version until now)
help me plz, where can I add new ringtones for my Gprofile???
Hey guys,
take it easy and go to the developers website with forum. There will get help for all quesyions and you can read so many stuff.
main page = www.ageye.de
forum = forum.ageye.de
Today on sunday at 08:43 european time the website is under Maintenance Service...
EDIT:
Since 19:00 european time the website is back (the moment where i have this tested, possible the site was back much earlier)
Hi!
I've also had the massive battery drain issue with G-Profile. According to the developer it's ROM related, so I guess it works on some ROMs and not on others. Maybe it has something to do with which WinMo build it's running. Also it can be related to what kind of profiles you're using. Those which are network dependent (auto switch on location for example) naturally draws more battery.
The latest G-Profile version is build 0401 (1st of april 2010). I've tried it on two Energy ROMs, one with WinMo 21905 and MaxSense back in June and one recently with WinMo 21682 and CHT 2 beta. I guess it's not a CHT/MaxSense issue since both of them had the massive battery drain even with no network activated profiles or auto switching (about 40-50% less battery in the morning after just lying in standby mode overnight with all radios except phone turned off).
So, all you people using it please tell me which ROM you're using and if it works or not. And also what kind of profiles you're using. I really like this app and will use any ROM to get it to work.
Cheers,
Tummen
Hi,
I'm running the Virtuous Unity 2.3.9.0 ROM on my Desire HD. So appreciate this question would be better placed in that ROM's own thread but the forum won't let me post there yet.
Please can someone tell me why when I use any app or widget (with exactly two exceptions) to lower (decrease) the brightness, the brightness dims slowly, taking a few seconds to be lowered to the requested value?
Those two exceptions are:
The built in Power Control widget (not HTC's brightness widget(s) which are affected by the issue); and
- The Quick Settings brightness slider.
The problem doesn't occur when increasing the brightness.
I want to use my preferred apps and widgets to be able to alter the brightness without having to wait. I don't like auto-brightness.
So unless I use those two exceptions, which aren't convenient for me, I have to wait a few seconds to see if the amount I've lowered the brightness to is okay or still too low or high. This is annoying. For example, this problem occurs using any other brightness widget, such as the HTC Sense one or third party ones; or using an app with user-adjustable brightness control built in, such as the e-reader Moon+ Reader.
I've worked out this happens whether I use the Sense launcher or my preferred launcher, Launcher Pro. I've tried reinstalling the ROM from a full system and cache wipe too but to no avail. The problem seems to occur whether auto-brightness is on or off.
Will be sure to thank any responses. And thanks in advance too!
I use an app called MySettings to control brightness. Works well on ARHD and LeeDrOiD although never tried Virtuous.
https://market.android.com/details?id=jqsoft.apps.mysettings
Thanks CitizenLee, but unfortunately it has the same issue. So it does appear to be either a bug or 'feature' with this version of the ROM. I wonder if anyone knows of a way to patch it somehow?
Hi folks,
Hope it's okay to bump this as the issue in my initial post is driving me nuts. Please can someone help?
The issue was solved by me by moving from the Virtuous Unity ROM to the Android Revolution HD 6 ROM.
However, I have the issue with my girlfriend's HTC Desire S. It seems that whatever customer ROM we flash (we've tried several) the issue remains. The fact the issue was resolved for my HTC Desire HD by switching ROMS suggests this is something to do with kernels, not phones or widgets.
I've Googled like you wouldn't believe, and can't believe we're the only people that find it annoying and unproductive that you get slow brightness reaction when using a brightness widget or in an app.
Any thoughts? I'm happy to pay a fiver (pounds!) to anyone who can solve this for her Desire S in a way that means she can continue to use a good customer ROM!
Regards
Bump away As long as they are 24 hours apart I have no problem with it.
I've never come across this before. I don't use Sense based ROMs so I'm probably not best suited to answer this, but....
Have you tried the app Tasker? I'm pretty sure that you can change the brightness and assign that to a widget. Not sure it that will still be "delayed" as such.
EDIT: Yes you can make a widget that instantly changes the brightness, there is a toggle under "Display Brightness" called "Immediate Effect" and with this on there isn't the 1-2 second delay. This is on CM7 so your use may vary on HTC Sense.
Also if you buy Tasker direct from the devs, not from the Market you get a 7 day trial. Give it a shot! -->http://tasker.dinglisch.net/
There are some things I can't get my head around.
From the screenshots of all the cool user ROMs and themes available it's clear they've been designed by clever people who use their phones a lot. So why does it appear from these shots they use the Sense launcher, and their default home screen has a big Sense clock and hardly any apps?
Presumably, like me, these people are pulling their phones out their pocket and putting them back there many times a day. Presumably also, like me, these people use a number of apps and widgets in a day that hits two figures. With this in mind, I want to be able to get to those apps and widgets easily and quickly. I.e., with as few swipes/clicks/screen presses as possible. I'm sure these people do too, right?
So that rules out the Sense launcher doesn't it, with its 4x4 grid limitation and non-resizeable widgets. Not to mention its time-consuming spin-in carousel effect every time the phone's security screen is unlocked. I haven't found anything useful the Sense launcher does that another launcher can't, at least after downloading other apps.
Furthermore, who really keeps that big clock on their home screen, when 1. you probably wear a watch; and 2. you can see the time on the top right. It seems like a silly amount of screen 'estate' to use.
Or is it that these people in fact have a more practical default home screen and it's just tradition to post the screenshots they show?
Finally, why do so many of these otherwise brilliant ROMs not mod the battery icon to show how much battery is remaining, percentage-wise? Appreciate this can be modded using the kitchen website. But surely everyone wants this info from the off, so is it not included?
Well, I'd never call myself a hardcore user - although I believe that term should be defined too, because I'm not sure it's interpreted the same way by everyone. That aside though, here's what I think on tinkering with the launchers. You buy an Android phone - be it of any manufacturer. In general, and especially considering the top level models, it can be said that there isn't much diversity hardware-wise. What does make a difference is the UI, the services integrated and how the phone handles them. (And let's exclude synthetic benchmarks for now, I don't believe they represent real-life scenarios.) So, someone knowledgeable going for an HTC device (meaning it's not chosen because of price or because of how "pretty" it is), imo, means they're attracted to Sense: those little nuances that do make the difference. Ditch the launcher and you've pretty much ditched at least about half of what Sense - of what HTC is about. But then, why did you go for HTC in the first place? And the same can be said with Samsung and SE as well, those who quite heavily modify the Android UI. Sure, you can do it, you can dump the whole customized everything...but can doesn't mean that you should: if you're a "hardcore user", however we define the rest of it, you know you'll have an easier life with a phone that runs stock Android, there's no point in choosing something customized (read: more complicated), with risk of locked bootloaders and whatnots.
And you're right: you can get the puzzle pieces from the Market (or elsewhere) to create a Sense-like experience. That's because Sense offers so many good things in one package that ppl are aiming at re-creating it, but ask this: if you want to re-create it, why not spare yourself the hassle and use the real thing right out of the box?
As for the clock: I haven't even owned, much less worn a watch for at least about ten years, nor do I feel the need. Actually they seem pretty redundant now that mobiles have become as complex as they are and being carried everywhere. But as for the battery percentage - I couldn't agree more, I wish I knew why HTC itself doesn't make it available at least as an option.
In addition to the great points made by breathlesstao, I'll add the following:
Many devs concentrate on performance, stability and removing bloat when developing their ROMs, so if you want UI mods like battery percentage etc then the option is there for you to do it yourself. It would be nice if HTC could add percentage but they do have a battery widget that shows it.
As for on screen icons, I suppose many people like a sleek looking interace with not a lot of clutter. Plus, the more you have on the homescreens the more likely you are to experience lag when scrolling between the screens. Personally I have every app I use often on one of the 7 screens and if I need anything else it's only a few presses away in the all apps menu. I like it to be set up with each page having similar types of app, so on one I have music / media related stuff, another tools / settings type stuff... etc. See my helicopter view screenshot below for an example. My screen aren't crammed, but then they're not too sparse either.
I actually like the flipclock as it integrates local weather and just generally looks cool... I also haven't had a watch since the 1990s.
Choice and the ability to customise things are part of the many joys of Android, you set it up your way and use it your way.
The replies are right in. As for the launcher I have people coming to me all the time cause their phone is slow and lagging and whenbi unlock screen they have dozens of shortcuts all over the screen. Of course its gonna be slow when it need to reload a the launcher and all those Widgets. I swear some look so much like an icrap with all the shorcuts when I see it I have to double check. Lmao
As for the battery icon, you have to edit the coding for the file to add the extra 150 images that make up the % battery and charging icons and the bigger the file......
Now the clock well to be honest I remove the clock from the top bar any chance I get as I see it as pointless. We have Widgets for that.
As for sense it has its pluses like everything is prebuilt in. Social networking (not sure as I don't use FB at all) built into contacts and all the other handy apps that it comes with. I mostly run a senseless Tom my self but that is only due to it be long a resource hog. But the contacts and dialer work so well together that I have not found a better dialer/contact combo. The sense 3 lockscreen is just too good. I have widget locker but prefer the sense lock screen
Some very good replies, and here is my take, i've been modding my phone(s) now for a few years now (Since the Windows Mobile 5 Genre) and I would say function is not the only thing i look for. I want "coolness", "graphics"... I love the way the flip happens when you unlock a Sense ROM ..I strive to make it smoother !
Having said that I do resort to simplicity at times however, and you can too. have a look at Cyanogenmod and get Launcher Pro.. Ain't nothing simpler than that with the most "Function".
The ROM above will satisfy anyone who loves Function over Heavyness and also it has the option of showing percentage battery amongst plethora of other customizations neatly laid out in the settings menu.
But sometimes that just isn't enough for me..I want a ROM with More......Sense framework is probably the best Integration of everything I've ever seen. Yes its huge ! But then...this phone ain't that weak either...It is a beast
That is why you have an "option" my friend...an option to choose non-sense ROM or a Sense ROM. You could go for a Sense ROM (if you like all the integration of sense) and get yourself a different launcher from the market if you choose..customize it with the battery percentage mod.... yourself... The Dev's like to leave the option customize some aspects of their ROM's to the users... mostly because its personal preference.
The Sense Rom cooks, mostly, give u the most basic thing... A highly optimized ROM with a stock-like UI. You can choose to customize it the way you like ! After all thats what XDA is all about ..do it youself modding..
Hi all,
Your responses are appreciated and it's nice to have a polite conversation about this!
You're right breathlesstao, what the hell's a hardcore user. I just meant anyone who'd flash a ROM, root their phone, perhaps mod some element themself.
So I guess many of you - suprisingly for me - are happy to swipe between screens to get to their apps or widgets. You like what less clutter for doing this. Can see your point of view! I don't experience any lag though, zelendel, for packing my homescreens.
I suppose it was assumed that if you're more knowledgeable you'd be aware of apps and widgets with more options and functionality than the Sense launcher and its own widgets, and choose to use the former instead.
To be clear, I do like using other HTC features such as their contacts and dialler. It's just the homescreen layout I'm ranting about.
In particular for me, a good GUI, as well as looking pleasant, is as simple and quick to to use as possible. So when, for example, I'm going for a lunchbreak at work it's satisfying to be able to put my music or podcast-player on in a second without having to hunt it down.
i keep meaning to try a non sense rom but i like virtuous unity 2.39 sense 3.0 rom so much i´m loathe to part with it.
i know it only takes twenty minutes to go back to it but i just find it does everything in such a pleasant manner.. its smooth fast responsive and most of all it looks the buisness. plus as others have said you dont have to use all that sense stuff if you dont want to.
for music i do tend to use the stock player but i have been playing with other ones of late same with video but things like the clock and weather widgets for me are much more polished on the sense versions than anything comparible available from the market. plus i´ve not had any problem running low on ram or anything, the dhd is more than capable of handling sense 3.0 and whatever else one cares to throw at it without any hiccups
Circle launcher 1x1 widgets are the best
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda premium
killersloth, thanks for the heads up - it looks very useful.
ponk2k, you know I also use VU (2.39) but with Launcher Pro - have uninstalled the Sense widgets that aren't connected to anything else. You probably think what's the point! To answer my own question, I wanted a custom ROM for things like battery life optimisation, and the VU team's branding has seemed more user-friendly to me than the non-Sense ROMs. Though maybe I'll try one soon. While I've got you though, can I ask if you have a problem with the brightness dimmng slowly on command in most scenarios with that ROM version? More info in my question here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1292894
Capys runny 1.5 is perfection
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda premium
killersloth said:
Capys runny 1.5 is perfection
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
100% bug free? I was thinking of trying it.
CitizenLee said:
100% bug free? I was thinking of trying it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just a fair warning man. No rom will be 100% bug free. That is what the stock roms are for. The roms here are for learning and trying new things. So there will always be bugs that need to be fixed. Plus some things that one person may see something a a bug while another sees it as a feature.
zelendel said:
Just a fair warning man. No rom will be 100% bug free. That is what the stock roms are for. The roms here are for learning and trying new things. So there will always be bugs that need to be fixed. Plus some things that one person may see something a a bug while another sees it as a feature.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks lol.
&by 'perfection' I definitely don't mean bugfree but it is everything I expect in a good rom. From the improvements to audio, the good battery life, and now decent skins too...
If it was bugfree what would be the fun in developing with it ?
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda premium
zelendel said:
Just a fair warning man. No rom will be 100% bug free. That is what the stock roms are for. The roms here are for learning and trying new things. So there will always be bugs that need to be fixed. Plus some things that one person may see something a a bug while another sees it as a feature.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I meant with the basic day to day phone functions and stuff like WiFi, video playback etc. To me that's an expected level of functionality for any non beta ROM. I've flashed and tested many over the last 2.5 years of owning Android handsets so my standards are quite high
CitizenLee said:
I meant with the basic day to day phone functions and stuff like WiFi, video playback etc. To me that's an expected level of functionality for any non beta ROM. I've flashed and tested many over the last 2.5 years of owning Android handsets so my standards are quite high
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is fully functional. I believe there is the bug in camcorder still where you have to watch play.the video in the same orientation you recorded it.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda premium
I haven't had any problems with vu dimming slowly no. I do find that the dimming settings on the ROM are a bit brighter than on the stock ROM though but with no noticeable battery drain incurred.
Thanks will have to investigate further.
zelendel said:
Just a fair warning man. No rom will be 100% bug free. That is what the stock roms are for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...aaaand potentially not even those. I mean, they're made by humans as well, and humans are bound to make mistakes, aye? It happens.
The most productive thread i ever encountered !!! Thanks to OP
Hi,
I had an old desire and a car head unit that didn't support BT streaming via ad2p, so when I got my new OneX, I quickly sold the old head unit on ebay and replaced it with a newer model that supported streaming. I am now able to stream over BT which is fantastic as my plays are now recorded on the phone (i use player pro & mediamonkey desktop pc to organise my collection). Plus now I can also scrobble to last.fm, which is something i've not been able to do since time began (in the car).
but now there's one thing that's quite annoying, the lack of info being sent to the head unit (track ID, etc). I did a bit of research and it turns out that the BT stack used in base android doesn't support AVRCP 1.3, which is the version of the protocol that supports track ID. Then I found that cyanogen started supporting this....
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_vendor_cyanogen/blob/gingerbread/CHANGELOG.mkdn
Is it possible for this to be included in the custom roms? I'm asking this in general first before asking a specific ROM dev to attempt to implement. Will this need an entire cyanogen base?
I'd love to see this implemented if at all possible
EDIT: oops, i think i've posted this in the wrong place as it's a question?
did u manage to find more info about this? Anybody else knows some more details? 10q
zombiefly said:
Hi,
I had an old desire and a car head unit that didn't support BT streaming via ad2p, so when I got my new OneX, I quickly sold the old head unit on ebay and replaced it with a newer model that supported streaming. I am now able to stream over BT which is fantastic as my plays are now recorded on the phone (i use player pro & mediamonkey desktop pc to organise my collection). Plus now I can also scrobble to last.fm, which is something i've not been able to do since time began (in the car).
but now there's one thing that's quite annoying, the lack of info being sent to the head unit (track ID, etc). I did a bit of research and it turns out that the BT stack used in base android doesn't support AVRCP 1.3, which is the version of the protocol that supports track ID. Then I found that cyanogen started supporting this....
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_vendor_cyanogen/blob/gingerbread/CHANGELOG.mkdn
Is it possible for this to be included in the custom roms? I'm asking this in general first before asking a specific ROM dev to attempt to implement. Will this need an entire cyanogen base?
I'd love to see this implemented if at all possible
EDIT: oops, i think i've posted this in the wrong place as it's a question?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll have a quick go at answering, If anything is wrong then please correct me
HTC have written their own Bluetooth stack that doesn't support AVRCP 1.3 (stupid really if you ask me). This stack will be found in the stock rom, as well as all sensed based custom rom's and possibly in some unofficial AOSP roms.
The Official CM roms should have the standard BT stack with AVRCP 1.3 drafted into it, meaning that it should push the track ID's to all receivers that support it.
To answer your question: Unless HTC's BT stack can be dissected and modded to support AVRCP 1.3, or the CM BT stack can be ported over to sensed based roms (both highly un-likely as HTC's BT stack is closed, and CM's BT stack wont work on sensed based roms) then this is not possible, unless you flash a CM rom on your One X
teky.co.uk has it covered above.
the htc BT stack is (as you would expect) half complete and doesn't support anything but basic connectivity and streaming. The cyanogen mod team added this functionality around cm7 (i think). so for phones that are supported by CM, you can flash a rom built around Cyanogen and you will have track ID.
Because we cant get S-OFF, we cant flash a pure CM mod, which presumably explains why there isn't one available. There is a port in the works by TripNRaver, however the last time I checked the BT streaming was on the issues list as not working, so regardless of it using AVRCP 1.3 or not, it wouldn't work anyway.
I'm quite frustrated by this. I bought the One X thinking it would be the best (and most up to date) Android phone available. Instead i'm stuck half way to removing the HTC crap from the phone for the first 3 months of owning it. I was able to get this functionality on my ageing HTC Desire (with custom rom)...
If you can get something to work, the music player pro application has recently added support for AVRCP 1.3 on phones that support it. So when we eventually get someone to implement a new BT stack in a custom ROM, or when HTC decide to support 1.3, we can actually use the feature!
This has been bothering me for some time; I actually sent an email technical support request to HTC for followup regarding this issue.
Maybe this will be fixed by the time Jelly Bean comes out? Or possibly that could be too adventurous.
I will reply back to this thread when I hear anything from the other side. I actually submitted a link to teky's great informative post in the ticket.
This is the response from HTC when I contacted them about it.
Thanks for your patience.
I can sadly confirm, after a long discussion with a senior technical agent, that Google have not yet implimented AVRCP in there Android O/S. It would seem to be avaiable for Windows based devices, possibly due to the amount of time Microsoft have been in the mobile firmware market. But, sorry to say, it is not yet part of Android.
The only advice I can offer, would be to post on the Google official forums about this as I'm sure you will not be alone with your requirement.
Thanks for your time and for contacting HTC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
help us cm9, you are are only hope.... bzzzzzzt
maybe a ROM developer could help re: porting the BT stack to a custom rom?
Here's what HTC sent to me, I have since followed up.
Thank you for contacting HTC.
With reference to your query, currenty we AVRCP 1.3 is not supported by One X. If you see that some of the function on your bluetooth is not working its because of the compatibilty of the phone and the bluetooth.
Sincerely,
Sammy
HTC
This is the best I could get out of them.
Thank you for contacting HTC.
With reference to your query, yes, HTC is looking forward to this. However, we cannot provide any definite detail at this time when will this be available to the phone. That is the reason why as well we are creating new and improve phone here for our customer. Plese refer to our website for any update to our product and service and we do apologize for the inconvinience.
So, anyone know how to porting the BT stack to stock rom? or any package to do that feature?
Tks All!
trungvn1790us said:
So, anyone know how to porting the BT stack to stock rom? or any package to do that feature?
Tks All!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if someone created a universal zip file to flash to any android phone, that would be awesome. How in the world did cyanogenmod do it? maybe if someone asks, they can tell you how to code it into any device's rom.
some further info on this.
tbalden's CM9 port works with avrcp 1.3
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1706001 this rom is reasonably stable (battery drain is quite bad so far, the worst rom i've tried) BUT! it works fully with ACRCP 1.3
the CM10 port by tbalden does not work. I've posted many times in the thread and even messaged him directly, but nobody ever responds to my questions.
Given that Cyanogen mod supports 1.3, i'd expect this functionality to be added soon as the rom develops. I hope so as it's a fantastic rom but it's a bit flaky at the moment (as it's alpha)... if you really need avrcp 1.3, the the above linked CM9 is a decent compromise.
I'd still like an answer on how this works? is it a driver? can it be packaged and added to any rom? I think not to be honest but would still like to know.
Really can't wait for this feature!
zombiefly said:
some further info on this.
tbalden's CM9 port works with avrcp 1.3
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1706001 this rom is reasonably stable (battery drain is quite bad so far, the worst rom i've tried) BUT! it works fully with ACRCP 1.3
the CM10 port by tbalden does not work. I've posted many times in the thread and even messaged him directly, but nobody ever responds to my questions.
Given that Cyanogen mod supports 1.3, i'd expect this functionality to be added soon as the rom develops. I hope so as it's a fantastic rom but it's a bit flaky at the moment (as it's alpha)... if you really need avrcp 1.3, the the above linked CM9 is a decent compromise.
I'd still like an answer on how this works? is it a driver? can it be packaged and added to any rom? I think not to be honest but would still like to know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, agree with u guys and really need a package that supported to install to stock ROM
Tks and appreciate for any Hero help to do this!
this functionality is now in CM10. i dont think it can be ported to other roms as i think it has some dependency on the kernel? (but what do i know?)
I've been running tbaldens CM10 for some weeks now and it's very stable
I also would like to have AVCRP 1.3.
As far as i understood the bluetooth stack must be compiled with the kernel. The blueZ stack does support AVCRP 1.3.
But we need a custom kernel compiled with it?
I now also wrote a support inquery to HTC. Perhaps they will implement the complete bluetooth stack if enough customers ask for it.
Regards
Kai
+1
need this feature, please...
makes2068 said:
+1
need this feature, please...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its in the main CM10 roms now.
Sorry to dig such an old topic. But has anybody been able to find some patch to get this feature on sense 5. I feel sense 5 is awesome, (sorry to sound selfish) cannot switch over to CM10.. is there anyway I can get it .
on ARHD 31.2
If HTC has been blaming google due to this feature not being available in android itself, I feel cheated.. because have seen this same feature on all other android devices.
Also this feature is there in HTC one , the current flagship with sense 5.. One of my friend has it. If only some dev can compare files and bring out some patch for OneX.
Great ROM but battery time is low.love to see version 3 implementing kat kat into Rom,plus solve battery drainage problem and slim down size of weather widget.Best camera for zooming.also like to see camera released separate and updated in Rom. maybe remove unnecessary widgets included as well.
fingers crossed x
Very pleased
Fantastic ROM.
Smooth install and (from what I can tell) perfect functionality.
I'd be very interested to see some lightweight transparent widgets.
Perhaps it's time I start learning to develop something myself...
Thank you to the devs!
(I can't cash you up, but if you ever have questions about playing the guitar, writing, or recording music, feel free to PM me!)
martinnotts said:
Great ROM but battery time is low... maybe remove unnecessary widgets included as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After using it for a few days now, I agree that the battery time is rather low. I'm trying to work out a systematic way to see if I can stretch it.
The only other issue I've had is that Google Maps (downloaded from Google Apps store) does not function properly. The graphics are all messed up when I try to zoom in/zoom out, and it causes the system to hang, although it doesn't crash.
I haven't retested it, but switching off "shake to report" (I think that's what it was called) improved the situation, but the problem still occurred.
Otherwise, I'm quite happy with the appearance, performance, and function of this ROM.