Develop Bugs

To those O/Ced a Q for you.

Im stone stock right now. Do you see an actual improvement in apps that need the extra O/C HP? I have one game I bought that seems to be a little choppy at times, 9mm HD, and Im not sure if its the games coding, the fact that it maybe having a problem with ICS, or just not enough hardware HP to be fluid.

I OC'ed when I first got the phone but quickly dropped it back to 1200. This phone doesn't need overclocking and if you are noticing lag in games it is most likely due to poor coding by the dev for either ICS or dual core phones or both. If it is lagging on a 1.2 GHz dual core and it is our hardware think about people running it on the Inc 2 with a 1 GHz single core processor and basically last years tech. Our phones should be fine to run most if not all games for about a half year or maybe a year before OCing will really be needed.

Why don't you just do it and find out? It's really hard to tell because no kernel is a stock kernel with 1.35 GHz / 1.4 GHz.
All these kernels featuring OC have additional features which means that it could be the features/tweaks that are fixing it rather than the OC itself.

zephiK said:
Why don't you just do it and find out? It's really hard to tell because no kernel is a stock kernel with 1.35 GHz / 1.4 GHz.
All these kernels featuring OC have additional features which means that it could be the features/tweaks that are fixing it rather than the OC itself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well,...Im just pretty content with how it performs in every other aspect, except for this one game bugs me a little. Ive been ROMed and O/Ced on this not too long ago, and TBH, theres always some sort of little thig that turns me off about it. A spontaneous reboot here, a F/C there, and I find myself going stock again. I would do it in a heart beat if it didnt mean having to set every last detail back up again when I unlock the phone.

And yes, being virtually OCD about this phone sucks, lol.

I have a question as well!
For those under-clocking or using UV kernels, do you see a noticeable improvement in battery life? I have a GSM sock GNex and the battery life is atrocious.

stevessvt said:
Well,...Im just pretty content with how it performs in every other aspect, except for this one game bugs me a little. Ive been ROMed and O/Ced on this not too long ago, and TBH, theres always some sort of little thig that turns me off about it. A spontaneous reboot here, a F/C there, and I find myself going stock again. I would do it in a heart beat if it didnt mean having to set every last detail back up again when I unlock the phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Should of unlocked the bootloader day one before playing with the phone your phone still remains stock. Just the bootloader is unlocked, you'll virtually feel no difference. Except the fact that you have to relock for warranty purposes later but you'll wipe everything so that is always good because you don't want to exchange a phone with all of your passwords.
@andythefan: Yes there is a huge battery difference. Visit the Franco Kernel thread in GSM forums for people's images of battery history.

Flash the James Bond kernel so your gpu will be upped to 384mhz. It is in the development section.
My grandma beat me down and took my nexus. Sent from a jitterbug with beats by dre.

@rbiter said:
Flash the James Bond kernel so your gpu will be upped to 384mhz. It is in the development section.
My grandma beat me down and took my nexus. Sent from a jitterbug with beats by dre.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Other kernels also have this feature. A lot of them do.

@stevessvt: In the myriad different combo's I've flashed (ARHD, Franco kernel, APex Kernel, bigxie ROM, AOKP rom, stock kernel, OC/No OC, Unvervolting, and 1 other kernel I can't even remember) I've yet to encounter a single random reboot, FC, or battery pull. I've also flashed countless different mods and basebands, etc.
It's all about doing your homework and really reading through threads before flashing and making sure different stuff is compatible and doing nandroids.
I can honestly say running a non-stock rom/kernel makes a noticeable difference in response and performance in daily use. Its really all the Kernel IMO, ROM's just give you features. I've however never noticed anything from OCing.
@andyfan: what build are you on? 4.0.2 has the hands down best battery life, and 4.0.3 with the Franco Kernel is nearly as good as 4.0.2 was (4.0.2 for me meant ~3% drain in 8 hours)

andythefan said:
I have a question as well!
For those under-clocking or using UV kernels, do you see a noticeable improvement in battery life? I have a GSM sock GNex and the battery life is atrocious.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For now any phone usage will give you terrible battery life due to the high power consumption of the screen especially if when it displays white onscreen content. Average CPU usage is very low unless you're running benchmarks consistently. Therefore UV tweaks have low impact on usage battery life.
With that said if your battery is irregularly draining while idle something may be active in the background.
Franco has made many tweaks to his kernel to reduce idle power consumption. He's gotten it down to about less than 1% drain per hour which can give you over 2 days of idle battery life. Just for ****s and giggles I have achieved that with less than 30 minutes of screen time with LTE enabled.
Franco's kernel is the best I've used in terms of overall battery life but none of the OC/UV kernels have significantly increased my usage battery life.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

Lean kernel vs Franco kernel

Which one do u perfer guys ? Both are awesone and cant make a decision Battery life ? Hotplug efficiency? Performance ?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

I'm getting crazy good battery life and performance on lean kernel and AOKP. Franco is good too, but I think I'm getting much better battery life on lean.

Each phone is different find out your preference on your own
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus

James Bond kernel.

I've seen what franco has done with the nexus s kernel, realiable, smooth, and constant updates, it was always my choice. So as soon as i get my GN its the first kernel i'm going to flash and hopefully it won't ever disappoint

same for me. I have a freaking good battery life on lean but better performance with Franco
cvbcbcmv said:
I've tried both for a great while. Battery life with interactivex on lean and hotplug on franco lean is definitely better, on my phone Lean runs a little bit better. on my phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

I found a few kernels in the dev section but couldnt find the lean one. Can you guys posts the link or more info on it. Nothing i found says lean on it. Please and thank you

GeLopez said:
I found a few kernels in the dev section but couldnt find the lean one. Can you guys posts the link or more info on it. Nothing i found says lean on it. Please and thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its Imoseyon kernel on Rootzwiki. btw, Ive tried both Lean and Franco kernel, I still prefer Ezekeel Glados kernel though. amazing smooth and friendly battery life.

I was using franco's kernel, but with all the hourly updates lately, it spooked me a little, so now Im on trinity inferno512 kernel, and wow games run fluid with the GPU at 512mhz.

im still debating... im jumping back and forth but i need to stick to one for a week and try it out!
leankernel has updates just as much as franco... i say thats a good thing
i say take a week long test and run some benchmarks with each of those kernels, take a screenshot, and come back with what you like.
Im working on that now.

GLaDOS is by far the best kernel for my phone. No lags whatsoever and four hours of screen on time with the stock battery

I'm starting to lean toward glados myself. I've had a lot of issues with Franco's 14.x kernels.
I've also found lean kernel to be a bit choppy. Shadow gun runs really choppy w lean kernel, but ultra smooth w either Franco and glados. It could be that I'm not using the correct governor though.

I have tried both back and forth. AS of last update I've tried franco 14.4 (deep sleep ~50%) which is good but has a much better battery life (deep sleep at 91%) on hotplug of lean 1.8.0.
+1 for lean

I have used lean kernel for a while now. I used to get lots of lock screen lag with Franco. Which I don't with lean.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Im on Leankernel 1.7.3 right now. Used Francos way before, but after Version 13.1 i started to get battery drain issues. So i switched over to Glados which seemed to have a good battery life to me, but was very choppy overall on Wheatley Gov'.
Lean is the best for me at the moment, almost 4 Hours Screen on time isnt a problem for me, i use the build in InteractiveX Governour, with some heavy undervolting. Data, Sync, Wifi , ... everything enabled. Screen Brightness ~ 35%
I gonna try Lean 1.8.0 Later that day. But i have to admit that Franco's next upcoming with Turtle Governor might be an interessting choice either.
For me, both devs are doing a really great job, both Kernels are good.

I've used three different Franco kernels and had freezing and reboot issues with all three of them. Never had an issue with Lean Kernel.

I don't care what kernel I have. If:
1.At the end of the day on my normal usage phone has less than 60% of battery left it means that the next day I won't manage
2. I have less than 60% I have to recharge overnight
3. Phone can get me throughout the day on heavy usage ...
Don't need any fancy kernels if they don't tick the first box
Edit:
Just tried lean kernel and its way to slow. Scrolling in text app or anywhere really isn't even half as smooth as Franco ....
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

After trying many kernels... I always come back to Faux123's kernel (Currently 011b10u). It's just such great battery life... idle battery drain is just a horizontal line on the battery graph for hours. LOVE IT. (P.S. Ultra-liquid-smoothness too). http://rootzwiki.com/topic/12512-kernelgn-lte3017ics4023uvgpucpu-occifsslqbotgfiopsv010jan-17/page__st__930

MattSkeet said:
Just tried lean kernel and its way to slow. Scrolling in text app or anywhere really isn't even half as smooth as Franco ....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which text app are you referring to that us siow? I'm using the LeanKernel and not really noticed anything.

jhericurls said:
Which text app are you referring to that us siow? I'm using the LeanKernel and not really noticed anything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock.... smooth as butter on Franco's. Lean even on home screen wash stuttering ...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

AOKP with franco kernel

So I've been using aokp for months now and franco's kernel even longer. both amazing pieces of work. franco's kernel has been 99 percent stable for me, with an occasional sod with a few builds here and there (nothing a full wipe can't fix). However after my last sod, I kept getting forced reboots upon startup so I just flashed the newest version of aokp and it's been working fine as expected.
my question is, can you guys tell me exactly all the advantages of using franco's kernel with this rom as opposed to the stock? even after using it all this time (since early December) I guess I haven't noticed any significant differences. maybe I haven't paid enough attention because so far this stock kernel in aokp seems to be handling everything just fine. thanks in advance
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Ok..., let's give it a try:
Franco's latest (nightly) kernel has (in contrary to stock AOKP kernel):
Sound Control (in latest builds from Ezeechiel (is that the correct way you write his name?))
GPU overclock
HotPlug for disabeling 1 CPU whith screen lock
USB Fast Charge enabeled
Wifi Power Management for better WiFi reception on screen lock
Color control.
I'm sure I forgot some settings.
Right now I get about 1% of battery usage in 2 hours when idle with data on (not Wifi), maybe 10 - 20 % with screen on (depending reception, what I do etc.) and I never have reached such figures with stock. I would for sure recommend Franco's kernel but a lot depends on your preferences. For me long lasting battery is important so I go easy on the clock speeds of the CPU.

thanks. that's the kind of information I was looking for. I don't feel the need to overclock but if there really is a good improvement in battery life, that's reason enough
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Is stock ROM less battery drain??

Which rom is the best [for battery life] between these one??
- cyanogenmod
- miui
- stock ics
All with the ultima kernel from riyal.

xperiap said:
Which rom is the best [for battery life] between these one??
- cyanogenmod
- miui
- stock ics
All with the ultima kernel from riyal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me its KA21 with Arcknight 3.3 Stock Kernel.
Really smooth, better battery than i experienced stockwise...

try ICS_anzu_KTG tuned_V1.41: governor interactiv

actually battery drain more depends on the kernels..for best battery life stock kernel is the best

Guys note that lad has Pro not Arc. Stock is usually the worst, or better - default gauge for custom ROMs. I've been watching cyanogenmod discussion for a while, usually users feedback on battery life varied from version to version; for tweaked versions can be said that battery life is the same as in stock while the performance is 20% better. I don't know about MIUI.
(Out of your question, the best for battery life are Ultima ROM and Buttermilk ROM which are optimized for battery life and battery life is notably better there; with Buttermilk and low usage you can do as much as 4 days without charging - worth for outdoor trips. Ultima ROM when idle eats like 0,6% per hour.)

Stock rom with stock kernal had the best battery life... but also lags the most.
I recomend arconium ICS with stock kernal for a balaced experiance...!!!

arpith.fbi said:
actually battery drain more depends on the kernels
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And how you use your Phone.

XperienceD said:
And how you use your Phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i dint get you..

arpith.fbi said:
i dint get you..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well if you game a lot compared to someone who doesn't then obviously ones battery will last longer than the other, so there's a few factors that can be taken into account in regards to battery life.

XperienceD said:
Well if you game a lot compared to someone who doesn't then obviously ones battery will last longer than the other, so there's a few factors that can be taken into account in regards to battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well my method of testing battery drain(i guess everybody tests the same way) is only on standby..how much time does it take to move 1% down when the phone is not touched for an hr or 2...in exceptional cases battery will drain fast while using 3G in one kernel but lil slow on other kernel..
again my point is kernel is more responsible for battery life of the phone rather than a ROM..

arpith.fbi said:
how much time does it take to move 1% down when the phone is not touched for an hr or 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then you need to take syncing into account, if yours is on and mine is off on the same kernel then yours may drian a bit quicker than mine, which goes back to my point of how a user uses their Phone. I don't think it's a black and white issue.

XperienceD said:
Then you need to take syncing into account, if yours is on and mine is off on the same kernel then yours may drian a bit quicker than mine, which goes back to my point of how a user uses their Phone. I don't think it's a black and white issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea dude.. i get it..my point was simple..people were talking about best roms for battery life.. i just said kernel plays an important role in deciding that..that was my only point..i wasnt arguing with anyone..and testing of battery drain at standby means with data off,bluetooth off, gps off..hence syncing of account wont come into picture

I'm not arguing, just trying to make a point also.

tigermess said:
(Out of your question, the best for battery life are Ultima ROM and Buttermilk ROM which are optimized for battery life and battery life is notably better there; with Buttermilk and low usage you can do as much as 4 days without charging - worth for outdoor trips. Ultima ROM when idle eats like 0,6% per hour.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As u can see [in my signature] im using ultima KERNEL. Is there also a ROM [for ICS}?? And is it possible to downgrade like on the iPhone??
arpith.fbi said:
well my method of testing battery drain(i guess everybody tests the same way) is only on standby..how much time does it take to move 1% down when the phone is not touched for an hr or 2...in exceptional cases battery will drain fast while using 3G in one kernel but lil slow on other kernel..
again my point is kernel is more responsible for battery life of the phone rather than a ROM..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, do u think my kernel is better for battery?
Srry for these annoying questions that are thousands of but I just wanna have enough when im not at home

xperiap said:
As u can see [in my signature] im using ultima KERNEL. Is there also a ROM [for ICS}?? And is it possible to downgrade like on the iPhone??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I know and sorry, the last two ROMs I was refering to are GB. However, Riyal is working on Ultima ICS ROM and it already exists in alpha version! See this post with download link Hopefully the ROM will have similar advantages as has GB Ultima ROM over GB stock ROM, which means better battery life, better wi-fi reception, improved camera and so on.

tigermess said:
....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, and is it also possible to DOWNGRADE from ICS to GB??
I did that when I had iPhone 4.

im using cm7.2 latest release alvays, i also have an app set cpu and i set my governor to scary, min freq 145 mhz, and max 1024, and im using profiles for apps that im using most of time (underclock cpu while using that apps)
with that i have at least 40% better battery life
and, yes, u can downgrade using flashtool
LINK:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1000012

So far Arcknight kernel has quite the reputation for good battery life. IMO, for roms i find CM9 from FreeXperia project quite awesome but then there's an issue with the battery stats and brightness for now so wait for the next release i guess. for GB try arconium 8.2. still mostly its based on kernel and also the governor.

Marchello1 said:
im using cm7.2 latest release alvays, i also have an app set cpu and i set my governor to scary, min freq 145 mhz, and max 1024, and im using profiles for apps that im using most of time (underclock cpu while using that apps)
with that i have at least 40% better battery life
and, yes, u can downgrade using flashtool
LINK:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1000012
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey friend, how do you do that? I dont ahve that option.
I remember i had on my other phone.
Im running the newest version. Should I change my device??

What option are you referring to?

2.3.6 or 4.0 ROM for the best battery life? (Wonder)

I used rebel rom and it's great (2-4 days).Even if overuse it it lasts 35-40 hours.But it's touch sensitivity sucks. (for example : When i touch the screen to go to another part of the menu it seems like i'm trying to run an application.I mean it looks like it's highlighted)
So what are suggestions for good battery life and touch sensitivity? (except rebel rom)

burak9393 said:
I used rebel rom and it's great (2-4 days).Even if overuse it it lasts 35-40 hours.But it's touch sensitivity sucks. (for example : When i touch the screen to go to another part of the menu it seems like i'm trying to run an application.I mean it looks like it's highlighted)
So what are suggestions for good battery life and touch sensitivity? (except rebel rom)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I never got 2-4 days with any ROM. Stock ROM (2.3.6) usually lasted full day and a half of use and I had to charge it accordingly. With CM10 I get pretty much the same battery life I got from STOCK rom. (Of course I am using Deep Sleep Battery Saver and Greenify). But I am not a heavy gamer (dont play games at all, may sudoku once in a while )
So they are the same to me.. But feature wise, I prefer CM10 of course..

thearif said:
Well I never got 2-4 days with any ROM. Stock ROM (2.3.6) usually lasted full day and a half of use and I had to charge it accordingly. With CM10 I get pretty much the same battery life I got from STOCK rom. (Of course I am using Deep Sleep Battery Saver and Greenify). But I am not a heavy gamer (dont play games at all, may sudoku once in a while )
So they are the same to me.. But feature wise, I prefer CM10 of course..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Stock Samsung ROM also for me only lasted 1, 1/2 up to 2 days. Now I´m Using Arcos CM9 RC2 and have to recharge it somwhere between 3 and 5 days. (depending on my usage)
I found Arcos 2.6.35 Kernel to be the most stable and battery friendly Kernel unlike the new 3.0 Kernel, where people are still reporting stability issues and some of us are having a high battery drain issue. So if you decide to try Arcos latest CM9 or CM10 and will get about the same battery life or worse than Samsungs Stock ROM, I would suggest to try CM9 RC2.
By using Arcos surces I even compiled my own 2.6.35 Kernel by just adding OC features and software Voltage control. With this Kernel I´m even able to run my phone at Extreme Undervolting settings rock solid.
There are even other custom Kernels you can use with RC2 or RC3, but for me they all didn´t run stable even at stock voltages due to all the tweaks in there. My SGW doesn´t like the additional tweaks. Especially the memory tweaks, though for others they seem to run stable.
That´s why I´m using now my own Kernel with OC and UV options but leaving the rest untouched. By undervolting the CPU it doesn´t last longer than I would keep the phone the whole time in DeepSleep, but it reduces the battery drain significantly when in use.

Wow 3 to 5 days is amazing. But I don't think I can give up CM10 . One and a half day is good enough for me. I had stability issues with CM9 RC5 and 6 with kernel 3 but those issues are not there in CM10 alphas I tried. I am on alpha 7 now and everything is in great working order.
And for a smartphone one and a half day is acceptable for my standards.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

honeyx said:
The Stock Samsung ROM also for me only lasted 1, 1/2 up to 2 days. Now I´m Using Arcos CM9 RC2 and have to recharge it somwhere between 3 and 5 days. (depending on my usage)
I found Arcos 2.6.35 Kernel to be the most stable and battery friendly Kernel unlike the new 3.0 Kernel, where people are still reporting stability issues and some of us are having a high battery drain issue. So if you decide to try Arcos latest CM9 or CM10 and will get about the same battery life or worse than Samsungs Stock ROM, I would suggest to try CM9 RC2.
By using Arcos surces I even compiled my own 2.6.35 Kernel by just adding OC features and software Voltage control. With this Kernel I´m even able to run my phone at Extreme Undervolting settings rock solid.
There are even other custom Kernels you can use with RC2 or RC3, but for me they all didn´t run stable even at stock voltages due to all the tweaks in there. My SGW doesn´t like the additional tweaks. Especially the memory tweaks, though for others they seem to run stable.
That´s why I´m using now my own Kernel with OC and UV options but leaving the rest untouched. By undervolting the CPU it doesn´t last longer than I would keep the phone the whole time in DeepSleep, but it reduces the battery drain significantly when in use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You would do this community a favour if you could present your modified rom to all people here

thearif said:
Wow 3 to 5 days is amazing. But I don't think I can give up CM10 . One and a half day is good enough for me. I had stability issues with CM9 RC5 and 6 with kernel 3 but those issues are not there in CM10 alphas I tried. I am on alpha 7 now and everything is in great working order.
And for a smartphone one and a half day is acceptable for my standards.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
slimbean 4.1.2 may last more than 5 days too but the old version with 2.6 kernel

5days ? slimbean ? really ? can give me the link of that rom that ur using with our Wonder ? please ?

gdonanthony said:
5days ? slimbean ? really ? can give me the link of that rom that ur using with our Wonder ? please ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think 5 days is about the max you can reach. But to reach this your phone need to be all the time in DeepSleep. So no calls, no WiFi, no MobileData, simply nothing. But in that case you also do not need a phone at all.
That´s also why I said somwhere between 3-5 days depending on my habbits.
For me the battery drain drops at night to somwhere between 5-8mA. Sometimes even to 2mA. I doubt the Slimbeam ROM can beat this as it also uses either Arcos 2.6 or 3.0 Kernel.
All the custom ROMs out there are basing on Arcos Kernels and work. Simply said they are still Arcos ROM´s with a modified or a different User Interface. Some are more battery freindly and some are less because of the background processes that are keeping the phone unnecessary active. But regarding DeepSleep the battery drain is depending on Arcos Kernel and how well the DeepSleep mode is tuned in this Kernel.

gdonanthony said:
5days ? slimbean ? really ? can give me the link of that rom that ur using with our Wonder ? please ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2034647
but use this Slim-3.1.0 Ancora 12/06/12 Unoffical
if you want more battery life
---------- Post added at 04:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:55 PM ----------
honeyx said:
I think 5 days is about the max you can reach. But to reach this your phone need to be all the time in DeepSleep. So no calls, no WiFi, no MobileData, simply nothing. But in that case you also do not need a phone at all.
That´s also why I said somwhere between 3-5 days depending on my habbits.
For me the battery drain drops at night to somwhere between 5-8mA. Sometimes even to 2mA. I doubt the Slimbeam ROM can beat this as it also uses either Arcos 2.6 or 3.0 Kernel.
All the custom ROMs out there are basing on Arcos Kernels and work. Simply said they are still Arcos ROM´s with a modified or a different User Interface. Some are more battery freindly and some are less because of the background processes that are keeping the phone unnecessary active. But regarding DeepSleep the battery drain is depending on Arcos Kernel and how well the DeepSleep mode is tuned in this Kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I spent 25 Hrs and most of it was in stand by mode and my battery was 88 % with slimbean rom 2.6 kernel

Ahmed.ragab said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2034647
but use this Slim-3.1.0 Ancora 12/06/12 Unoffical
if you want more battery life
---------- Post added at 04:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:55 PM ----------
I spent 25 Hrs and most of it was in stand by mode and my battery was 88 % with slimbean rom 2.6 kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So pretty much the same like with Arcos RC2 and it´s 2.6 Kernel.
This below is another 18 hours later while not just in StandBy all the time, but making calls, checking Mails and a few other things:

hhhmmm ill w8 for the updates for that ROM for now just observing CM10 by arco ... just want to reinstall everything to fix battery drain

honeyx said:
So pretty much the same like with Arcos RC2 and it´s 2.6 Kernel.
This below is another 18 hours later while not just in StandBy all the time, but making calls, checking Mails and a few other things:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you even have apps installed? thats awsum battery life. What else besides UV did you perform to obtain this? i didnt even have that battery life with stock

vklexer said:
Do you even have apps installed? thats awsum battery life. What else besides UV did you perform to obtain this? i didnt even have that battery life with stock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It comes even better. :silly:
SlimBean on k2.6 used as clock in the morning. (smartassV2, 368-1200Mhz)

heross said:
It comes even better. :silly:
SlimBean on k2.6 used as clock in the morning. (smartassV2, 368-1200Mhz)
View attachment 1842890
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what mockery is this?????!
What is so special about slimbean that others rom dont have? there must be a drawback?

vklexer said:
what mockery is this?????!
What is so special about slimbean that others rom dont have? there must be a drawback?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
look to it's size and you will know

the reason i stayed at CM10RC7 is that messaging is awesome
does this slimbean http://www32.zippyshare.com/v/78276962/file.html have the same messaging ? please can someone give a SS of the message interface

gdonanthony said:
please can someone give a SS of the message interface
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean a SS from this screen?

heross said:
It comes even better. :silly:
SlimBean on k2.6 used as clock in the morning. (smartassV2, 368-1200Mhz)
View attachment 1842890
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you mentioned smartassv2 kernel on K2.6. Where can i get it? i've flashed Slimbean, but i can't undervolt and can't choose any other kernel

You can get the Kernel here. download "kernel-JB-V2-NORMALMEM-2.6.35-06-12-12" and flash in recovery.

Thanks. Btw, is this my imagination or is the camera quality compared to CM9 poor on Slimbean?