OK, the long and short of it is - this GNexus is unstable even at stock clock speeds. It reboots periodically (this is true on stock JB and CM10).
On CM10, I've managed to get logcats (which reveal nothing consistent), but more usefully (maybe) is last_kmesg. It tells me:
Unhandled fault: imprecise external abort
So - can somebody tell me a way to make this device more stable? I am pondering underclocking. Or changing the governor. Or changing the voltage (although, I don't know which way to go: up or down!).
I guess I'm looking for whatever tricks overclockers would use to increase stability - except, leaving it at the stock clock speed
JeremyNT said:
OK, the long and short of it is - this GNexus is unstable even at stock clock speeds. It reboots periodically (this is true on stock JB and CM10).
On CM10, I've managed to get logcats (which reveal nothing consistent), but more usefully (maybe) is last_kmesg. It tells me:
Unhandled fault: imprecise external abort
So - can somebody tell me a way to make this device more stable? I am pondering underclocking. Or changing the governor. Or changing the voltage (although, I don't know which way to go: up or down!).
I guess I'm looking for whatever tricks overclockers would use to increase stability - except, leaving it at the stock clock speed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well. If you get reboots , increase the voltages by 25 mv. See if that helps.
Sent from my trasbeaned Galaxy Nexus.
The lower voltages allow less use of battery, but if they are too low (reboot, freeze), you should increase it a little
If you're having reboot issues even on stock, it sounds like a hardware issue and needs to be replaced.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
geoffcorey said:
If you're having reboot issues even on stock, it sounds like a hardware issue and needs to be replaced.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have 400 bucks lying around, hence my desire for a way to make this one just suck less
I'll try the voltage increase to see if that improves anything. Is there a recommended app for doing this?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Cm10 has the option in "performance" settings to change your voltages
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Switch to the Team EOS rom (nightly or stable) , use the latest Franco Kernel(latest) with gpu at 384 and finally underclock to 1ghz instead of the stock 1.2. I am currently using the dyninteractive governor.
I experience less heat, way fewer reboots, better 4g, things are still snappy and you can still speed up animations to .5x the speed in developer options. Oh and the extra battery life is nice.
Someone also recommended using only one band with WiFi. I use 2.4 only. It can be found in the advanced setting in wireless.
GNex + Team EOS JB + Franco Kernel + @1Ghz = Stable Goodness
JeremyNT said:
I don't have 400 bucks lying around, hence my desire for a way to make this one just suck less
I'll try the voltage increase to see if that improves anything. Is there a recommended app for doing this?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It still should be covered under the manufacturer warranty.
Allons-y
.
Allons-y[/QUOTE said:
It's not Allons-y, it's Alonso Bistrot :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Manufacturer warranty, insurance. Your carrier should be willing to swap the phones out especially if you just got it. Running jbsourcery 2.3.6 and Franco milestone. I've had a total of 4 reboot period on this device since it was debuted.
runhopskipjump said:
Switch to the Team EOS rom (nightly or stable) , use the latest Franco Kernel(latest) with gpu at 384 and finally underclock to 1ghz instead of the stock 1.2. I am currently using the dyninteractive governor.
I experience less heat, way fewer reboots, better 4g, things are still snappy and you can still speed up animations to .5x the speed in developer options. Oh and the extra battery life is nice.
Someone also recommended using only one band with WiFi. I use 2.4 only. It can be found in the advanced setting in wireless.
GNex + Team EOS JB + Franco Kernel + @1Ghz = Stable Goodness
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol @ fewer reboots. Seriously? Can't remember the last time I had a reboot.
...
malaroth said:
Manufacturer warranty, insurance. Your carrier should be willing to swap the phones out especially if you just got it. Running jbsourcery 2.3.6 and Franco milestone. I've had a total of 4 reboot period on this device since it was debuted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the unlocked international gsm phone which has no US warranty. Obviously if I could get it fixed for free I would.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
@rbiter said:
Lol @ fewer reboots. Seriously? Can't remember the last time I had a reboot.
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would reboot by itself when it became too warm. Franco's lastest 282 kernel seems to have solve this heat/self reboot issue for me. I can use 1.3 ghz without a problem. I couldn't do the stock 1.2ghz on the stock kernel without it rebooting by itself. It is also super smooth and fast.
GNex + Team EOS JB + Franco Kernel + @1Ghz = Stable Goodness
Related
Ever since i flashed francos kernel for the first time i failed to see any difference whatsoever in batterylife or performance. 4 versions of franco kernel later and still no change. Even bought his app and tried undervolting. I accidentaly uv'd by 100 in the 700 category and none of the side effects were happening so i tried undervolting all by 200 and even setting on boot. Nothing happened. I then flashed jame bond kernel and nothing happened. When i tried flashing glados kernel it just froze on boot. I experimented with all of them for at least a day and except glados which didn't work they all showed no difference than stock regarding battery life or performance. What could be the cause of this?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Kernels don't have the profound effect you might think on this phone. Not nearly as much as devices I have had in the past.
I'm aware of that, but still. No difference whatsoever? Even when i intentionally try and break it by undervolting by 200?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
What did you undervolt by 200? Some speed steps can get away with that.
What ROM are you using?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
adrynalyne said:
Kernels don't have the profound effect you might think on this phone. Not nearly as much as devices I have had in the past.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Adrynalyne! Its good to see you here!
Yeah, on the Fascinate, Kernels had much more of a profound effect. I can't say the same for this phone. But the OP said that he purposely tried to Bork his phone to see if it worked and it didn't even touch it. That's really strange. I can purposely try to Bork mine and do a pretty damn good job of it.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Some kernels had broken UV interfaces that wouldn't undervolt the kernel and would allow you to undervolt by absurd amounts. (though it wasn't actually doing anything)
joshnichols189 said:
Some kernels had broken UV interfaces that wouldn't undervolt the kernel and would allow you to undervolt by absurd amounts. (though it wasn't actually doing anything)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, are all the most popular kernels broken? Franco, glados, jame bond? I'm more inclined to think the problem is localized (either me or my phone).
And i'm running aokp 20, btw. Had 19 and milestone2 before those, which were all installed after full wipes (before anyone suggests that).
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Your not the only one with this problem as I too have seen no change in battery performance on my gnex. I'm also using aokp 20 and Franco's (14.4). What I don't get however is that my buddy seems to see significant improvement in his phone while running the same rom/kernel combo
I've had some friends do some tests for me and run stock kernels for a while.
The differences in performance and battery life were menial between custom and stock.
What about all those people that claim seeing improved battery life? Not to mention those impresive screenshots of battery stats that show numbers i have yet to even come close to.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Many of those screenshots are sleep time.
Also, never underestimate the power of placebo.
adrynalyne said:
Many of those screenshots are sleep time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
naturally. also, data calls are a huge battery drainer, even with excellent reception, when actually using the phone. the same with wifi.
to give the op an example, this last night i forgot wifi on. connected to my home network. the phone slept well (something woke it up in the middle but for a very short period of time, probably gmail), and i only lost 3%. i normally loose 1% in 7hrs approx., so it wasnt so bad.
on the other hand, if screenOn is true, it will obviously drain faster..
adrynalyne said:
Many of those screenshots are sleep time.
Also, never underestimate the power of placebo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 on that.
Btw adryn, what kernel/rom do you use in your gnex?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Tried a lot of combinations, but at the time of writing the original post i had been using aokp 20 with franco 14.4 for a while. I am currently trying aokp20 with trinity 384mhz gpu.
Also i lost about 2%/hour with franco in standby. I had mobile data connected and autosync only for google account + yahoo mail, all set to sync each hour.
Waiting on trinity now. Curious if i notice any difference besides the lack of franco's blueish tint.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
adrynalyne said:
Many of those screenshots are sleep time.
Also, never underestimate the power of placebo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This.
However, the GPU overclock is noticeable on games like Shadow and GTA.
yondercomesthetrain said:
+1 on that.
Btw adryn, what kernel/rom do you use in your gnex?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My own or stock. I experiment a lot. Currently I am running a custom with a tweaked deadline scheduler, and a slightly different oc method for gpu and cpu than everyone is using to 1.35ghz. Stock voltages, tweaked ramdisk for filesystem mounts. Stock sleep profile of 350/700 on Interactive. Not using Setcpu to overclock at all. I set the power profile in fw-res to include the extra speed step.
So far so good, but its too early to tell. I went to bed and work up 9 hours off battery with 99% remaining. So its definitely deep sleeping fine I won't know for a couple days on whether it sucks battery dry or not.
ericc191 said:
This.
However, the GPU overclock is noticeable on games like Shadow and GTA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't play a lot of games but 307mhz to 384, nets me 3fps in Nenamark2. Not exactly mind blowing.
adrynalyne said:
Many of those screenshots are sleep time.
Also, never underestimate the power of placebo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly. I used to go crazy doing this and that, disabling this and that to try to get 20+ hours that people were getting on stock battery. Then I came to realize that the screenshots are probably mostly sleep time. Me being a very social person (text, IM, Facebook, and Tweet a lot) there is no way I was ever gonna get anywhere near 20 hours on stock. So I bought a couple of spare batteries, turned stuff back on, turn the screen back on brightly and enjoyed the phone and its great screen without worrying about battery life
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Ill be as honest as I can. I just had two nexus and installed two different roms and and two different kernels....I believe they don't do anything as well..And I thinks its placebo effect when people are saying there battery's are better or the screen is smoother....I see not much of a difference even in stock...yes the benchmark may go up but that's means nothing really....
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
So I've been using aokp for months now and franco's kernel even longer. both amazing pieces of work. franco's kernel has been 99 percent stable for me, with an occasional sod with a few builds here and there (nothing a full wipe can't fix). However after my last sod, I kept getting forced reboots upon startup so I just flashed the newest version of aokp and it's been working fine as expected.
my question is, can you guys tell me exactly all the advantages of using franco's kernel with this rom as opposed to the stock? even after using it all this time (since early December) I guess I haven't noticed any significant differences. maybe I haven't paid enough attention because so far this stock kernel in aokp seems to be handling everything just fine. thanks in advance
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Ok..., let's give it a try:
Franco's latest (nightly) kernel has (in contrary to stock AOKP kernel):
Sound Control (in latest builds from Ezeechiel (is that the correct way you write his name?))
GPU overclock
HotPlug for disabeling 1 CPU whith screen lock
USB Fast Charge enabeled
Wifi Power Management for better WiFi reception on screen lock
Color control.
I'm sure I forgot some settings.
Right now I get about 1% of battery usage in 2 hours when idle with data on (not Wifi), maybe 10 - 20 % with screen on (depending reception, what I do etc.) and I never have reached such figures with stock. I would for sure recommend Franco's kernel but a lot depends on your preferences. For me long lasting battery is important so I go easy on the clock speeds of the CPU.
thanks. that's the kind of information I was looking for. I don't feel the need to overclock but if there really is a good improvement in battery life, that's reason enough
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Wanna save some battery?
Have a look at this, my experience on undervolting my Nexus using Franco kernel:
Red - system not stable
Green - system stable and runs without any crash
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ah8PsMa_NqfedC1sZjhWUkNCRHJHeWNOS1RzU1NUNEE
Only tested 3 minutes? Let us know after you have more time under your belt.
sent with 3g courage. better recognize. 4g courage coming soon. stock up on diapers.
@rbiter said:
Only tested 3 minutes? Let us know after you have more time under your belt.
sent with 3g courage. better recognize. 4g courage coming soon. stock up on diapers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the 3 minutes were tested under heavy duty - frequent task switching, video streaming and file system stressing. I'll update the document once I find any unstable voltages, so please come back for updates if you wish.
btw, everyone's phone is different, so the voltage settings may not work on all phones.
Here's what I've been using
Two words..
Smart reflex
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
ChongoDroid said:
Two words..
Smart reflex
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you wanna take the time to play with the voltages, you will get better battery life than using SR. I watched SR and it was running a good 75+mv higher across the board than when I underclocked it. Its been just as stable and smooth manually undervolting.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
I was reading about few people showing undervoltages and stuff but I get really lost I dont want to mess up my phone.
I am running the lean kernel or imoseyon and I flashed it via the franco kernel app it has his kernel and the one I said.
Now I have no idea which settings to choose and which are safe... can anybody help me out?
-viperboy- said:
If you wanna take the time to play with the voltages, you will get better battery life than using SR. I watched SR and it was running a good 75+mv higher across the board than when I underclocked it. Its been just as stable and smooth manually undervolting.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some people should only use SR, since they do not know how to uv, and troubleshoot that by themselves.
Sent from my i9250 using Forum Runner
So, what's the point OP? Wonderful chart for your own use, but does little for everyone else.
miketoasty said:
So, what's the point OP? Wonderful chart for your own use, but does little for everyone else.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its a reference for others, not a "guaranteed to be the best voltages" chart.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
I've used these as a good reference.
The voltages have been stable on my Galaxy Nexus. They are good to reference. In most cases the most I could undervolt from these settings was 25mV. So far, I've had pretty good battery life. I'll definitely vouch for houzuoguo's spreadsheet.
Anyone have real statistics and battery readings that prove undervolting is even worth the effort?
where is the test? i dont see any testing
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
nomisunrider said:
Anyone have real statistics and battery readings that prove undervolting is even worth the effort?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll try to do some identical real world testing with my normal usage with Smart Reflex on then with my undervolt settings. I should be able to report back in a day or two.
The Results
Okay, so here are my results:
ROM: AOKP build 36
Kernel: Franco 166
Governor: Interactive
SmartReflex enabled
CPU: 192MHz to 1036MHz
Battery: Stock 1850mAh
3G on when screen is on with occasional LTE usage. Never used WiFi.
The first 3 attachments are without undervolting.
Attachments 4-6 show my undervolting settings.
The last 3 attachments are with my undervolting settings enabled. FYI, I used the saved values for the last 3 attachments.
If anyone wants anymore information on app usage just let me know. I have a few more screenshots, but didn't feel like uploading a ton of files.
I'm not sure if these results are sound, but I just updated to AOKP build 38 and Franco Milestone 4 kernel. I'll continue to test and see if these results are consistent.
Doesn't look much of a difference with doesn't it? according to CPU Spy and screen on time, as well as looking at 384MHz and 1036MHz CPU.
Thanks for the suggestions Houzuoguo. I am running LiquidSmooth-ICS-v1.5mr1 and Franco Kernel Milestone4
I took your settings and raised them all by 25.
I used Set CPU to set them and i also set the CPU to ondemand and dropped the CPU speed to 1036.
Are you using Set CPU to do this?
My Results
Thanks you very much BrandT90!! I tried some of you settings and changed some values. It's incredible. 11 hours!!! :good:
Look at the screenshots
ROM: Paranoid Rom 2.16
Kernel: Franco Milestone 5
Governor: Ondemand
SmartReflex enabled
CPU: 230MHz to 729MHz (but I use the schedule feature in SetCPU for Apps which need more CPU)
Battery: Stock 1850mAh
I set my brightness to automatic and tweaked the settings in cm10.
3G/Wifi: Juice Defender manages them.
Without undervolting I had the same results like BrandT90. (Look at his first 3 screenshots)
View attachment 1365310 View attachment 1365309 View attachment 1365311 View attachment 1365312
BrandT90 said:
Okay, so here are my results:
ROM: AOKP build 36
Kernel: Franco 166
Governor: Interactive
SmartReflex enabled
CPU: 192MHz to 1036MHz
Battery: Stock 1850mAh
3G on when screen is on with occasional LTE usage. Never used WiFi.
The first 3 attachments are without undervolting.
Attachments 4-6 show my undervolting settings.
The last 3 attachments are with my undervolting settings enabled. FYI, I used the saved values for the last 3 attachments.
If anyone wants anymore information on app usage just let me know. I have a few more screenshots, but didn't feel like uploading a ton of files.
I'm not sure if these results are sound, but I just updated to AOKP build 38 and Franco Milestone 4 kernel. I'll continue to test and see if these results are consistent.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3hrs 55min on stock battery? That's awesome
--------
Sent from my Nexus Galaxy
Thanks for these settings! I'm hoping this continues to get updated.
Ever since I had my nexus I only flashed AOKP and Faux's kernel. But the annoying part is that when Im using interactive or ondemand and the phone go to a higher speed, the phone gets too hots, and when it reaches 1200Mhz it gets too hot to the fact that I cant touch the top of the screen or the back cover on the camera side. Only way out of it is me using conservative and UC to 920Mhz and the phone wont reach that speed anyway. Any help please?
::No more than whatsapp and Gtalk are installed::
::Heat only happens when the screen is on. when its off it goes into deep sleep without wake ups::
::I have a GSM Nexus with WiFi only on and 2G connected without data::
Try a different kernel?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus running Slim ICS
theking_13 said:
Try a different kernel?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus running Slim ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried Franocs, Popcorn, CMPlus, Trinity and more. still the heat occurs when it reaches high speeds
How about stock?
adrynalyne said:
How about stock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I unlocked and flashed AOKP as soon as I got the device haha. So I have no idea.
How hot exactly? What temperature?
What brightness is your screen set to?
adrynalyne said:
How about stock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would follow adrynalyne suggestion on this. flash stock, see if it still behavs like that, and, if it does, I would suggest returning it.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201
Try flashing Faux's reset kernel followed by his latest release.
nodstuff said:
How hot exactly? What temperature?
What brightness is your screen set to?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont know how much but it burns! its just way too hot. I had a phone call when it was that hot and when I put the phone on my ear I almost threw it away because of the heat!! My screen brightness is at its lowest but I have the color multiplier from faux kernel on.
bk201doesntexist said:
I would follow adrynalyne suggestion on this. flash stock, see if it still behavs like that, and, if it does, I would suggest returning it.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just love AOKP and Faux's kernel I cant leave those!!
tibere86 said:
Try flashing Faux's reset kernel followed by his latest release.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried it and I still had the same issue.
Dude, temporarly. *facepalm*
sent from my i9250
Hi,
Temperature is subjective,I mean if you just touch your phone and say "it's hot"...
If I wash my hands with cold water then I take my phone...I find it hot...
Cools your hands (in the fridge ) and use your phone 5 mins, you will find it very hot...
There are already many threads about this...Arrrrgh,can't use the search function ,but for sure for the last week there is about 2 threads about that...
Try a fresh install,starts from scratch with full wipe etc,just your current ROM and if it continues flash another kernel...
Monitor your CPU temp with an app,not just your feeling,it may be biased (System Tuner for example or maybe an app like cpu temp,on the Play Store),for their respective (if you test anothers) kernel try Franco kernel updater or Glados control to monitor the CPU temp.
Also see if there isn't an app,a script,etc...that could fully or almost load your CPU...
iKarido said:
I just love AOKP and Faux's kernel I cant leave those!!
Tried it and I still had the same issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After that...If your phone is burning but you don't want change your config for see if it helps...Bah...What else?
viking37 said:
Hi,
Temperature is subjective,I mean if you just touch your phone and say "it's hot"...
If I wash my hands with cold water then I take my phone...I find it hot...
Cools your hands (in the fridge ) and use your phone 5 mins, you will find it very hot...
There are already many threads about this...Arrrrgh,can't use the search function ,but for sure for the last week there is about 2 threads about that...
Try a fresh install,starts from scratch with full wipe etc,just your current ROM and if it continues flash another kernel...
Monitor your CPU temp with an app,not just your feeling,it may be biased (System Tuner for example or maybe an app like cpu temp,on the Play Store),for their respective (if you test anothers) kernel try Franco kernel updater or Glados control to monitor the CPU temp.
Also see if there isn't an app,a script,etc...that could fully or almost load your CPU...
After that...If your phone is burning but you don't want change your config for see if it helps...Bah...What else?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks alot. I running Gummy now with another kernel and the heat issue decreased in a big way.
Been running CM10.2 M1 on my G Nex with 4.3.1 for 3 days now and the experience as a daily driver is FANTASTIC !! It's a complete overhaul for the G Nex with it's aging dual core Ti OMAP and 1 Gb RAM. The customisation and tweakings are stellar, so much so that I've revived my old love for my G Nex. Perhasp, I've started to neglet my brand new Nexus 5 as it has been sitting on my desk, powered off for 3 days already. lol...
The N5 is a monster when it comes to performance, nothing can touch it ! Even the fluidity of the CM10.2 on my G Nex is no match. But the customisability of the mod is what wins my heart. Not going to root my N5 anytime soon as it's still brand new as hell hehehe...
Have any of you guys felt the same as me ?
kensim781 said:
Been running CM10.2 M1 on my G Nex with 4.3.1 for 3 days now and the experience as a daily driver is FANTASTIC !! It's a complete overhaul for the G Nex with it's aging dual core Ti OMAP and 1 Gb RAM. The customisation and tweakings are stellar, so much so that I've revived my old love for my G Nex. Perhasp, I've started to neglet my brand new Nexus 5 as it has been sitting on my desk, powered off for 3 days already. lol...
The N5 is a monster when it comes to performance, nothing can touch it ! Even the fluidity of the CM10.2 on my G Nex is no match. But the customisability of the mod is what wins my heart. Not going to root my N5 anytime soon as it's still brand new as hell hehehe...
Have any of you guys felt the same as me ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course the Nexus 5 feels/is faster.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium HD app
kensim781 said:
Been running CM10.2 M1 on my G Nex with 4.3.1 for 3 days now and the experience as a daily driver is FANTASTIC !! It's a complete overhaul for the G Nex with it's aging dual core Ti OMAP and 1 Gb RAM. The customisation and tweakings are stellar, so much so that I've revived my old love for my G Nex. Perhasp, I've started to neglet my brand new Nexus 5 as it has been sitting on my desk, powered off for 3 days already. lol...
The N5 is a monster when it comes to performance, nothing can touch it ! Even the fluidity of the CM10.2 on my G Nex is no match. But the customisability of the mod is what wins my heart. Not going to root my N5 anytime soon as it's still brand new as hell hehehe...
Have any of you guys felt the same as me ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And?
Btw what speed and did you guys set for the CPU, mine is 700 - 1200 mhz, Interactive. Not sure is it a good choice ?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
kensim781 said:
Btw what speed and did you guys set for the CPU, mine is 700 - 1200 mhz, Interactive. Not sure is it a good choice ?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
700 is very high. I bet your battery wont last long. Mine is 192-1228
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium HD app
mrgnex said:
700 is very high. I bet your battery wont last long. Mine is 192-1228
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will try 192 out...
I've always had mines set on 384-1228, it's what the ROM came with.
BTW
In trickster mod under "max screen off" its set to 576, will that also be okay to set to 192?
There's issues with 192mhz
Beamed from my Maguro
Mach3.2 said:
There's issues with 192mhz
Beamed from my Maguro
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What specifically are your issues?
Cause when I first set it to 192 the battery section under settings wasn't displaying correctly, but a simple reboot fixed that issue.
Running 4.1.2 PA ROM, zen 10 kernel.
Also previously CPU governor was set to interactiveX and I noticed a some lag/delay in certain apps but then(now) set it to performance and no lag more.
To early to tell if battery life has improved.
isajoo said:
What specifically are your issues?
Cause when I first set it to 192 the battery section under settings wasn't displaying correctly, but a simple reboot fixed that issue.
Running 4.1.2 PA ROM, zen 10 kernel.
Also previously CPU governor was set to interactiveX and I noticed a some lag/delay in certain apps but then(now) set it to performance and no lag more.
To early to tell if battery life has improved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's something about losing mobile data iirc, it's been ages since anyone last talked about it. It dates back to the late ICS era I think..
Beamed from my Maguro
Mach3.2 said:
It's something about losing mobile data iirc, it's been ages since anyone last talked about it. It dates back to the late ICS era I think..
Beamed from my Maguro
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks like your right, cause before push email notifications worked fine, even with the screen off and now it seems to be broken.
Will be back to confirm after restoring an older backup of ROM.
Edit:
Push email seems to be working again even with 192.
LOL