Develop Bugs

Galaxy Nexus LTE Roms

Hello, im thinking about flashing a new rom on my phone but just wanted to get some input on which is the fastest / stable rom for galaxy nexus LTE version.. any input would be great thanks

I'm using the latest ARHD and love it. I haven't tried anything else so can't compare but I have no reason to flash anything different considering this is pretty perfect.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

I'm running GummyNex 0.2.9. It has great support (updated every night that I've been running it so far) and includes a few minor tweaks that add to the experience. Probably my favorite thing about it is that it includes an OC/UV kernel (that is kept updated, as well), so it makes installation of everything even easier.

I'm running zygotes 1.9 . Tried gummynex and arhd both excellent roms as well. Bench marked highest with zygotes so I am sticking with this for now. If you want stability #1 I'd say arhd.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

Which ROM is has great battery life and is the most stable/fast. I do like mods too and stuff I just don't know which to flash to get the SMOOTHEST and fastest experience plus better battery life. I'm on a 4.0.2 right now I should probably go to a 4.0.3?
Sent from this GN on 4GLTE!

Personally, I'd go with ARHD. I've used it on my Transformer, and once I finally get around to flashing my device, that'll be the first (and most likely) only rom I put on it. Mike does a great job with his ROM's, and I haven't found one (especially on my Transformer) that I like more.
That's just my opinion. As usual, YMMV, but it's what I'd use.

mild7intl said:
I'm running zygotes 1.9 . Tried gummynex and arhd both excellent roms as well. Bench marked highest with zygotes so I am sticking with this for now. If you want stability #1 I'd say arhd.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what I'm about to flash. Looked through all the roms on xda and rootwiki and this seems to be the best

maha1o said:
Hello, im thinking about flashing a new rom on my phone but just wanted to get some input on which is the fastest / stable rom for galaxy nexus LTE version.. any input would be great thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can't go wrong with Peter Alfonso's Bugless Beast 4.0.3. His roms are always stable, he has a lot of experience. His roms are also on Rom Manager, which makes it easy too. He also has 4.0.2 & 4.0.1 builds
Galaxy Nexus Bugless Beast 4.0.3 cdma

What's the best overall? I'm on arhd and its pretty good just want to really know what's best. Arhd needs a 4.0.3.
Sent from this GN on 4GLTE!

ceredics said:
What's the best overall? I'm on arhd and its pretty good just want to really know what's best. Arhd needs a 4.0.3.
Sent from this GN on 4GLTE!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The best IMO is Zygot3 v2.0 its really smooth and great on battery life. 2nd runner up is Android Revolution HD v2.1.2. I chose Zygot3 because battery, life the T9 dialer, notification toggles, advanced power menu and modded launcher that has a settings button.

I was using RootzBoat v4 from and it was great. I got the urge and flashed a CM9 kang.
IMO the CM9 kang is iffy. Works well but getting issues where apps just randomly close. Maybe a memory issue. It comes with notification toggles and the CM9 T9 dialer which is sweet.
Rootzboat was pretty smooth. I have a backup of it. I had a battery percentage mod and CM9 T9 Dialer. No notification toggles though.
Widgetsoid toggles are flaky. They work better in CM9.
Honestly just backup your current from and start going hog wild. Almost all rooms work with 100% functionality except MIUI. Some are just more stable then others.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

arhd gets my vote

ROM
maha1o said:
Hello, im thinking about flashing a new rom on my phone but just wanted to get some input on which is the fastest / stable rom for galaxy nexus LTE version.. any input would be great thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I installed Android Revolution HD yesterday and I'm liking it, I'm noticing a bit less lag when scrolling between screens than I was on stock. I'm also seeing a little better battery life, I'm guessing 10-12 hours, where I was seeing 5-8 hours before. This ROM is worth checking out as there aren't a ton of options at the moment. This should hold me over until CM9!

Is it worth switching to JB from ICS yet?

I've been on CM9 RC1 for a while, but I want to switch to the CM10 kang; I'm worried that it'll suffer in battery life and stability though. Should I just wait for official or is it worth using as a daily now?

shadowlink217 said:
I've been on CM9 RC1 for a while, but I want to switch to the CM10 kang; I'm worried that it'll suffer in battery life and stability though. Should I just wait for official or is it worth using as a daily now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't necessarily wait til its official, but wait until it's a bit less laggy.

xboxfanj said:
Don't necessarily wait til its official, but wait until it's a bit less laggy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, also, CM9 is now up to RC2

All of my phones are running stock...
Epic - FC09 debloated
GS3 - LG2 debloated
GNex - 4.1.1 AOSP build
IMO, just keep the epic on stock or a stock based ROM... even though it is outdated, it runs best on the hardware.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

The 7/26 paranoid build of 4.1.1 runs fine, but nothing I have tried runs like cm9 rc2 yet.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2

brandon489 said:
The 7/26 paranoid build of 4.1.1 runs fine, but nothing I have tried runs like cm9 rc2 yet.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd reply in the development forum, but xda-developers hate their users and I can't...
The main problem with the kang CM10 rom right now is the same problem they fixed in CM9, found here: epiccm.blogspot.com/2012/01/cm9-longterm-testing-is-showing-android.html (again, if xda-developers didn't hate their users, I could post a link).
If you can find a way to not use any RAM, its great! Once you open 2 or more apps, the system chugs for ~5 minutes each time you need a bit more RAM.

No. They just don't want any idiot or spammer posting in development. You need 10 contributing posts.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium

As others have said, I would wait. I tried the CM10 kang from the other day (not paranoid android version) and it just didn't feel "complete," likely because it isn't. Oddly enough I figured while I was wiping I would go back to TPR and am now enjoying superb battery life that I forgot I ever had while using ICS.

shadowlink217 said:
I've been on CM9 RC1 for a while, but I want to switch to the CM10 kang; I'm worried that it'll suffer in battery life and stability though. Should I just wait for official or is it worth using as a daily now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you have to ask, probably not. It lacks a lot of polish and should only be used a step between proof of concept and daily driver. Or just to show off to others.

In my experience jellybean seems really smooth. But I was on aokp m6 previously so I was happy to be back on a cm build.
Sent from my SPH-D700 running jellybean

DCRocks said:
Agreed, also, CM9 is now up to RC2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but right on the top of epiccm.blogspot.com it says not to use RC2 because it has issues they are working on.

gfdos.sys said:
Yeah but right on the top of epiccm.blogspot.com it says not to use RC2 because it has issues they are working on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, they warn you that you'll have to re-flash gapps and/or visual voicemail. RC2 is still on my old Epic. It runs fine aside from the known bugs of RC1.
Sent from my AOSP Android 4.1.1 Galaxy Nexus

gfdos.sys said:
Yeah but right on the top of epiccm.blogspot.com it says not to use RC2 because it has issues they are working on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You gots a free thanks! :thumbup:

This is just my opinion.... But CM9 RC2....is by far the best yet.. And i mean that because it is flawlessly, no bugs whatsoever or fc... Just a little fyi... I always Odin back to stock before I flash anything... And RC2 is snappy, stable, and has great battery life...... I can wait for jb
UNTOUCHABLE CM9 RC2

jctello1 said:
This is just my opinion.... But CM9 RC2....is by far the best yet.. And i mean that because it is flawlessly, no bugs whatsoever or fc... Just a little fyi... I always Odin back to stock before I flash anything... And RC2 is snappy, stable, and has great battery life...... I can wait for jb
UNTOUCHABLE CM9 RC2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Note quite "flawless" I'd say... there's still the camera focus problem, bluetooth problem, etc.

RC2 bugs follow.
Auto flash only works if you toggle flash on/auto after each reboot, no LED for video, video MMS messages do not work, slideshows for MMS do not work, Bluetooth will not connect or end calls with screen off and will often disconnect/reconnect at random times, WiFi sleeps regardless of set policy.
Everything else works fine.
Sent from my AOSP Android 4.1.1 Galaxy Nexus

I really can't talk for anybody else.... But i have no focus problem on my camera or blue tooth........... Like I said before... I always Odin back to stock and then reroot and then install the latest update of the rom I like...... And CM9 RC2 has been great with me.... I am not saying that using Odin to go back to stock and re flashing will fix all the problems..... But i don't have any complaints...
UNTOUCHABLE CM9 RC2

jctello1 said:
I really can't talk for anybody else.... But i have no focus problem on my camera or blue tooth........... Like I said before... I always Odin back to stock and then reroot and then install the latest update of the rom I like...... And CM9 RC2 has been great with me.... I am not saying that using Odin to go back to stock and re flashing will fix all the problems..... But i don't have any complaints...
UNTOUCHABLE CM9 RC2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bottom line, there are still some bugs... not huge ones, but the rom isn't 100% yet.... just sayin

I will agree with that.... The rom is not %100...... My point was that in my opinion.. This is rom is the most stable as of now...... And i have tried them all.... The water I look at it.... The build of a rom I can be as snappy or as fastest.... But for me stability is counts more.... What's the point of having a fast ui if it keeps fc on you..... You get my drift?
UNTOUCHABLE CM9 RC2

Sorry for my misspelling.... Have not had my coffee yet.......!!
UNTOUCHABLE CM9 RC2

Jelly Bean AOKP vs Cyanogenmod 10

Hey guys. I was wondering if anyone has thoroughly tested both Cyanogenmod 10 and AOKP with Jelly Bean. If you have, what are the performance differences, as well as the default theming, and most importantly, battery life. I'm currently on Bugless Beast which has no modifications, so I'm not really interested in which has more features, because I'm sure they're both full of them. Currently I get around 2 hours of screen on time (CDMA Nexus), which I consider good, so If you've experienced more than that on either of these roms, please let me know. I plan on switching to one of them when I receive some good reviews. Thanks

dsass600 said:
Hey guys. I was wondering if anyone has thoroughly tested both Cyanogenmod 10 and AOKP with Jelly Bean. If you have, what are the performance differences, as well as the default theming, and most importantly, battery life. I'm currently on Bugless Beast which has no modifications, so I'm not really interested in which has more features, because I'm sure they're both full of them. Currently I get around 2 hours of screen on time (CDMA Nexus), which I consider good, so If you've experienced more than that on either of these roms, please let me know. I plan on switching to one of them when I receive some good reviews. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1) Make a backup of your current ROM
2) Flash either AOKP or CM10
3) Try said ROM out for ~1 week
4) Make backup of that ROM
5) Flash next ROM and try it out
*** NO ONE can tell YOU what ROM is going to run best on YOUR phone. You use your phone different then other people and their experience may not be the same as yours***
This is not meant to be rude, but just the dead honest truth.

Seriously, if you're not into customizing, stock. Stock ROM, stock kernel, just stock. Unless you have Verizon since there's no JB update I don't think
If you really want either of them, here's my "short comparison"
AOKP: AOKP is probably one of the most customizable ROM out there. It has all the settings that I personally care for and use a lot. On top of that, faux kernel helps this ROM run like a boss! Not a smoothest ROM though to be honest. Also not all the features from ICS is in JB yet, so keep that in mind.
CM10: This also has a lot of customization, but not as customizable as AOKP. (That's only by few features though). CM is known for how stable it is. I personally had no issue with CM when running it on my GSM phone. However, there isn't stable version yet.

kyokeun1234 said:
Seriously, if you're not into customizing, stock. Stock ROM, stock kernel, just stock. Unless you have Verizon since there's no JB update I don't think
If you really want either of them, here's my "short comparison"
AOKP: AOKP is probably one of the most customizable ROM out there. It has all the settings that I personally care for and use a lot. On top of that, faux kernel helps this ROM run like a boss! Not a smoothest ROM though to be honest. Also not all the features from ICS is in JB yet, so keep that in mind.
CM10: This also has a lot of customization, but not as customizable as AOKP. (That's only by few features though). CM is known for how stable it is. I personally had no issue with CM when running it on my GSM phone. However, there isn't stable version yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What gives better battery life and a faster phone overall. Faux or Franco?

dsass600 said:
What gives better battery life and a faster phone overall. Faux or Franco?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That again you need to decide. Every device is different. I personally had better experience with Faux (Maybe because it is stock for AOKP? I dunno)

kyokeun1234 said:
Seriously, if you're not into customizing, stock. Stock ROM, stock kernel, just stock. Unless you have Verizon since there's no JB update I don't think
If you really want either of them, here's my "short comparison"
AOKP: AOKP is probably one of the most customizable ROM out there. It has all the settings that I personally care for and use a lot. On top of that, faux kernel helps this ROM run like a boss! Not a smoothest ROM though to be honest. Also not all the features from ICS is in JB yet, so keep that in mind.
CM10: This also has a lot of customization, but not as customizable as AOKP. (That's only by few features though). CM is known for how stable it is. I personally had no issue with CM when running it on my GSM phone. However, there isn't stable version yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What features has AOKP that CM9 doesnt? What kind of customizables? Thanks

dsass600 said:
What gives better battery life and a faster phone overall. Faux or Franco?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Faux, franco kernel makes my phone act up every now and then.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus on AOKP

CM10 for a stable, less buggy ROM. AOKP for customization. End of story.
Also, Faux kernel is my preferred kernel.

juanmaper said:
What features has AOKP that CM9 doesnt? What kind of customizables? Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never tried CM9, but if it's anything like CM10 M1, AOKP Jelly Bean latest build has a bit more features. But I could personally care less for. You should just backup your ROM and try AOKP if you ask me. If you don't like it, you can simply restore.

Cm10 to stable ROM and cleaner ROM aokp is a hacked rom
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

miketoasty said:
CM10 for a stable, less buggy ROM. AOKP for customization. End of story.
Also, Faux kernel is my preferred kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your joking right? Right?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

Dsmforlife92 said:
Cm10 to stable ROM and cleaner ROM aokp is a hacked rom
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What kind of biased comment is this?
Swyped on my Galaxy Nexus running Black Bean with Franco Kernel

kyokeun1234 said:
What kind of biased comment is this?
Swyped on my Galaxy Nexus running Black Bean with Franco Kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its just not as clean as cm10 I don't mean it sucks. Its just the way they get all those custom settings are a little more dirty coding that's all I'm saying relax, people are too sensitive on this forum.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

I really like AOKP ICS. But I'm on CM10 and CNA now, the current builds from AOKP are too buggy and unstable for me.

Dsmforlife92 said:
Its just not as clean as cm10 I don't mean it sucks. Its just the way they get all those custom settings are a little more dirty coding that's all I'm saying relax, people are too sensitive on this forum.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At least explain your "findings".
Saying it's just hacked up and dirty coding is a little naive.

z7nz said:
I really like AOKP ICS. But I'm on CM10 and CNA now, the current builds from AOKP are too buggy and unstable for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't know what you're talking about. AOKP is very stable.
Sent from my Nexus 7 on AOKP, Trinity Kernel

JBSourcery - download it, flash it, mod it, like it, love it...

Both are great, although I'd recommend CNA. Now where's the lock?

Dsmforlife92 said:
Its just not as clean as cm10 I don't mean it sucks. Its just the way they get all those custom settings are a little more dirty coding that's all I'm saying relax, people are too sensitive on this forum.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, that's all I'm asking for. You shouldn't just put negative comment like this without any good reason. I really don't think it's necessarily to say AOKP is "hacked" you know?
---------- Post added at 06:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:15 PM ----------
Soldier-2Point0 said:
You don't know what you're talking about. AOKP is very stable.
Sent from my Nexus 7 on AOKP, Trinity Kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, but CM is a bit more stable in my taste. But nothing to write a book about AOKP is very stable, like you said.

You can't judge a rom if it isn't labeled as "stable" by the dev.
I am using AOKP since the
early ICS builds and i am using their JB versions now. They have tons of customization (and much more to come) and although they are considered nightlies (actually they are weeklies or so ) they are pretty stable and fast.
I have always used franco kernel with it and it is just great.
I currently use AOKP build 4 with franco r281, a black wallpaper, black theme and auto brightness. I get 4 hours of on screen time using the extended 2000mah battery. Besides the on screen time the rom is very battery friendly, with no random wakelocks.
Sent from my AOKP Nexus using xda Premium

Jelly bean kernel?

So I've seen a few sigs talking about custom kernels on there et4g while running some version of aosp jellybean. Just wondering if anyone had info on this
Sent from my SCH-R760 using xda app-developers app

If i am not mistaken, there are no custom JB kernels yet. Unless someone has gotten a good source recently.
(Taken from the AOSP JB Thread)
"Originally Posted by wraith404
http://e4gtcm.blogspot.com/2012/05/t...-emmc.html?m=1
Follow these instructions. You have to flash the specific kernel. Forget the ICS version, it only works right with cm9.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2"
If you are talking about this post... this is about Mutliboot (Allows you to temporarily reboot into a completely stock TW Rom to update PRL, Profile, and things like that) Once you reboot, it will restore your original rom. (Quite the handy tool)
If there is a true JB kernel developed, I stand corrected. But to my knowledge as of this morning, there isn't. (Devs feel free to chime in on this if you will)

No other JB kernels except for sbrissens, which technically is a custom kernel since there isn't a stock kernel for the et4g his had to be written from scratch on top of the ICS source
We are legion, for we are many.
Sent from the DarkSide of the GalaXy with a MEK device

-EViL-KoNCEPTz- said:
No other JB kernels except for sbrissens, which technically is a custom kernel since there isn't a stock kernel for the et4g his had to be written from scratch on top of the ICS source
We are legion, for we are many.
Sent from the DarkSide of the GalaXy with a MEK device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I haven't been running JB lately and haven't seen any buzz about it yet. I may have to check that out later and see how it runs.

milky1112 said:
Thanks, I haven't been running JB lately and haven't seen any buzz about it yet. I may have to check that out later and see how it runs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you are a power user may not be a good choice battery levels are not on par yet but most of the builds are very stable

charlie81 said:
if you are a power user may not be a good choice battery levels are not on par yet but most of the builds are very stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worse than any aosp ICS build honestly. The builds take a few days to stabilize and if u calibrate your battery they easily get u through a day
Sent from my SCH-R760 using xda app-developers app

tweakymattman said:
No worse than any aosp ICS build honestly. The builds take a few days to stabilize and if u calibrate your battery they easily get u through a day
Sent from my SCH-R760 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not in my experience. It's not absolutely awful on the JB ROMs, but it's not equal to CM9 in my opinion. Also, there is no battery calibration on this phone, other than using it and letting the fuel gauge converge to accuracy.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

charlie81 said:
if you are a power user may not be a good choice battery levels are not on par yet but most of the builds are very stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Meh, battery life isn't really an issue... I have my phone tethered directly to a motorcycle battery in my backpack.. I can get atleast an hour and a half screen on time before it dies running JB.... But honestly, i'm always trying them to see how things go. But I use the typical conservation methods.. (Juice Defender(Data on screen on), Screen dim, 15 sec timeout, and all the other goodies to help make the juice last), If all else fails.. I do internet support for a cable company, i'm sitting at a computer all day so i've got power to recharge if needed LOL..

milky1112 said:
Thanks, I haven't been running JB lately and haven't seen any buzz about it yet. I may have to check that out later and see how it runs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its the kernel included in every JB build available for out phone. Its the only JB kernel available right now because there are no leaked JB kernels and no source so sbrissen had to rewrite the ICS kernel to run JB for us
We are legion, for we are many.
Sent from the DarkSide of the GalaXy with a MEK device

Dchibro said:
Not in my experience. It's not absolutely awful on the JB ROMs, but it's not equal to CM9 in my opinion. Also, there is no battery calibration on this phone, other than using it and letting the fuel gauge converge to accuracy.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By calibrate, I think he means charging to full and deleting battery stats.
Can be done in recovery (under advanced) or with an app from the store.
______________________________
Sent from my Epic 4G Touch
ROM : ¶ÀräN0|d ÀnD®ÖïD 2.16
Modem: fi25
pegasusq governor
noop i/o scheduler
underclocked : 800 mHz
_______________________________

Dchibro said:
Not in my experience. It's not absolutely awful on the JB ROMs, but it's not equal to CM9 in my opinion. Also, there is no battery calibration on this phone, other than using it and letting the fuel gauge converge to accuracy.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with this, I can't go all day with normal use and no charging on jb but its no issue on various ics roms. The jb roms are all very nice though and definitely stable enough for daily use.

Which Rom is your DailyDriver and why?

I've tried almost every rom out there but just keep coming back to Blazer or Kyan for my daily satisfactions without frustrations
ATT GS3

White Hot! GS3.

Tried several, AOKP e.g. but none had the full functionality of Diet ICS where literally everything works. It has been my DD for months now, practically the longest I've ever had a rom. Though I'm still waiting for a truly stable JB.

bdbx18 said:
Tried several, AOKP e.g. but none had the full functionality of Diet ICS where literally everything works. It has been my DD for months now, practically the longest I've ever had a rom. Though I'm still waiting for a truly stable JB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What company do you have with your gs3?
White Hot! GS3.

I use ParanoidAndroid. It's CM10 based and it has nice hybrid/tablet modes. It's smooth fast.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium

Apocalypse487 said:
I use ParanoidAndroid. It's CM10 based and it has nice hybrid/tablet modes. It's smooth fast.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I love that rom but every cm10 rom I flash I get low volume on recorded video:banghead:
White Hot! GS3.

I personally love nottach's ROM Ariel after being on kyan, blazers, paranoid, year of dragon, and now my favorite Ariel.
Its fast, smooth, everything is working, great mods, and stable.
Plus I get to pick what's in the ROM with the aroma installer.
Sent from my SGSIII with the XDA Premium App

How is th battery life on ariel ?

skwon said:
How is th battery life on ariel ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2

Was running blazer rom bit switched to Ariel as dev is on hold for a bit. Then after 2.09 Ariel I went stock and rooted. I tried AOKP and a dozen other roms but none were super stable or offered the functionality that stock did. So waiting it out for official jb and hoping for something better. I really wish we had a team perfection rom like I had on the note. That was my dd
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2

Bruce Lee said:
Awesome.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey there,
Is Ariel for i747?

enomi said:
Hey there,
Is Ariel for i747?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes
there you go
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1846701&highlight=ariel
looks good to me

Has anyone tried wanam vs Ariel ? Which is more stable and smooth ?

What : AOKP 10-13-3012 paired with ktoonez KT747 kernel
Why : smooth as silk, nothing i've tried to do hasn't not worked (yes thats a double negative, thats how awesome it is) and paired with the undervolting capabilities of KT747 the battery life is amazing
What more could you ask for in a rom/kernel combo.....other than maybe a sammich

I've used PA, CM10 and AOKP, but im on SlimBean for now. Use to use CM10 as DD but its been very buggy lately. Tried PA for a few weeks but hybrid mode is nothing special, and AOKP had bad battery life for me. SlimBean is ok, not the best but good enough to be a DD. Battery Life is decent. Never tried Baked rom yet but it looks interesting...

I don't really feel like I have a DD just yet. I'm still going thru the searching process for one. For a while, I was using Blazer, then I switched to a couple different JB leaks. I ran a couple different versions of Drew Garen's JB Roms: Milestones 2, 3 & 3.5. They weren't stable enough for me to use daily because of too many force closes and random re-boots. Then I switched to Graffixnyc's BlackJelly: Versions 0.6, 0.7 & 0.8.
I like the theming done in BlackJelly. But lately in V0.8, I've been getting random re-boots. I'm going to test drive Serinity next (probably flash it later today).
I'm really just hopping around sampling everyone elses theming until the official JB is released, then I will probably flock to the one I liked best with a stable ROM. By the way, I don't use any touchwiz, I prefer to use Nova Launcher.
I haven't tried any CM10 or AOKP yet. I'll probably do that when it moves away from nightlies (not that the JB leaks are more stable by any means).

I use liquid rc5, tried switching to pa 2.21, and aokp build 4, but nothing seems to work as well as liquid. New play store installed and working, and as well as jb flash player. Battery is good, but and i never had strong 4G where I'm at, and but I get 5 bars consistently here with liquid. I love it as a daily.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

I'm on Ariel 2.10 since last night and I get awful battery life. Unplugged and within 10 min I used 8% battery just looking at Facebook.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app

ryan1977 said:
I use liquid rc5, tried switching to pa 2.21, and aokp build 4, but nothing seems to work as well as liquid. New play store installed and working, and as well as jb flash player. Battery is good, but and i never had strong 4G where I'm at, and but I get 5 bars consistently here with liquid. I love it as a daily.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I might flash Liquid this afternoon instead of Serenity.

dntesinfrno said:
What : AOKP 10-13-3012 paired with ktoonez KT747 kernel
Why : smooth as silk, nothing i've tried to do hasn't not worked (yes thats a double negative, thats how awesome it is) and paired with the undervolting capabilities of KT747 the battery life is amazing
What more could you ask for in a rom/kernel combo.....other than maybe a sammich
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry, undervolting capabilities? Hwo can I do this? I have AOKP as well.