Hey guys, I'm just wondering what settings do you have on your setcpu for the best performance and battery life? I'm totally new to this lol
Sanks
kazemagic said:
Hey guys, I'm just wondering what settings do you have on your setcpu for the best performance and battery life? I'm totally new to this lol
Sanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i i think that ondemand is the best for daily using... i'm using cm10 rom and i have some music problem so i'm using interactive and it's ok. if you don't use games or heavy apps, you can underclock it to 1ghz or even less and put on powersave.. but you have to try and find the best for you
My setup is a little complicated. I use the ondemand governor, then for the profiles I make it use powersave and under 760mhz between 1am and 8:30am which seems to really help during the night. Also set it to use 760mhz max when the screen is off.
When charging or above 40% battery I allow it to run full speed, but only when the screen is on, therefore helping charge times. On charge or above 80% I set the governor to performance.
In call I set the clock to max 1000mhz and conservative to try and allow calls on low-battery to work properly without lag but also without killing the battery.
I have a couple of other options set for very low battery ( < 12% ) too, but those are only to extend the battery if it's dying.
I wouldn't say all this is necessary... but I need my phone to keep working at all times as I use it for receiving business calls.
It's just a matter of playing around really... depends what you use the phone for. For the most part tell it to use lower clock speeds when you don't need them so much (when phone is off, during the night, during call etc) but you will really notice the speed difference if it's underclocked while you use it, so I tend to allow it to use full whack when screen is on, unless the battery is low.
I also set up profiles to make things like Bloons TD4 run in performance mode and min of 1000mhz, to keep them smooth . Drains the battery though!
lol setcpu does a really good job at battery saving. When using ondemand, my phone can last more than 2 days (if it's on standby)
Have you guys tried under-vaulting? What does it rlly do?
kazemagic said:
lol setcpu does a really good job at battery saving. When using ondemand, my phone can last more than 2 days (if it's on standby)
Have you guys tried under-vaulting? What does it rlly do?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you mean decreasing the voltage on the CPU, no I haven't. From my experience in desktop PCs however, if the CPU voltage is too low it can lead to hardware issues and instability.
If something needs a certain amount of power, and you give it less, it will either try and draw more amps which increases heat and can fry components, or won't work properly. You could probably "under-volt" the CPU at the same time as reducing the clock speed however, but your performance will suffer. When the processor is set to be ondemand it underclocks itself when not in use anyway
The biggest battery drain is screen and radios, concentrate on using them less. Underclocking the CPU will make the phone last longer when in use, but usability will suffer and turn your super fast smart phone into a sluggish one. I only make mine stay underclocked when the screen is off, during a call, or on low battery. During general use I let it do its thing .
UV(Under volt) is actually not to bad. Don't ever set those values at boot, else when they are too low, it will cause BOOTLOOPS. It just reduces the amount of power allowed for the cpu to use, thus it won't use more than required. You can't really ask a person for his/her uv values, as no 2 chips are created equal.
People stating that they UC(underclock) their device is not quite right. We don't have much control over our cpu's to be honest. If you run tegra stats whilst using you're phone, you'll see what I mean. It will sometimes(happens quite often) just bump up to higher frequencies to which you UC them. Also as soon as the screen is locked and unlocked the max cpu frequency set by the governor will just return(for example: say stock is 1500mhz, and you set it to 1400mhz, it will return to 1500mhz after an unlock). Ondemand is very very good for battery and performance. But remember you have to tweak those values individually in order to optain the best possible performace for the given task you want. Whether it is for battery or performance.
It's actually also a lot better to just tweak those values as to TRY and uc. Uv will stick, UC not!
Here is a small example as to battery saving and performance values for ondemand governor:
sampling rate:---------60 000 ----- 30 000
up threshold:--------------95 ----- 60
sampling down factor:-------2 ----- 8
powersave bios: ------------3 ----- 0
ignore nice load:------------0 ----- 0
io is busy:------------------0 ----- 0
Related
Heya,
I've heard of this SetCPU program, and figured it has some solid potential of saving battery power.
My question is - does it work? I've read several post claiming that SetCPU doesn't work on HTC phones.
If it does - will using the "Mix \ Max frequency" mode will save battery during stand by and normal usage, or just slow down the phone?
Using Rooted Desire, LeeDroid 2.2d.
Its primary use is to overclock the CPU, its secondary use is to create profiles and reduce the clock or change the governor. This will improve battery life slightly but also decrease responsiveness, depending on how far you go.
You'll need root if you want to use it.
To really increase battery life you have to use a custom ROM with an undervolted kernel.
So you're saying that the saving in battery life is insignificant considering the slowdown in performance?
yes, you use LeeDroid which is undervolted, thus perfect conditions.
It also uses a custom governor 'Smartass' which gives you best performance while using it and limits the max. clock while sleeping. That's the most common method to increase battery life with SetCPU while maintaining performance. So no, you don't need SetCPU, LeeDroid handles everything perfectly already.
However, the Desire has a very powerful CPU, compared with other Smartphones. So you can use SetCPU to limit the clock to maybe 700MHz or 800MHz. This will increase the battery life but also reduce the processing power. If you don't play games, don't do a lot of simultaneous things or browsing huge websites, don't use heavy loaded homescreens, it's possible that you don't notice the reduced processing power.
Thanks again
I guess there is no damage to the SnapDragon if I lower clock speeds a bit...
But, if I want to do some overclocking - how far is it safe to go?
When I OC'ed my Q6600 CPU I used the TheremalRight Extreme 120 with two Slip Stream fans to cool it off.. So, will heat damage be a constant threat to an overclocked Desire?
I currently live in Israel, and it's hot as hell even on stock speeds
CoreOxide said:
Thanks again
I guess there is no damage to the SnapDragon if I lower clock speeds a bit...
But, if I want to do some overclocking - how far is it safe to go?
When I OC'ed my Q6600 CPU I used the TheremalRight Extreme 120 with two Slip Stream fans to cool it off.. So, will heat damage be a constant threat to an overclocked Desire?
I currently live in Israel, and it's hot as hell even on stock speeds
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I for one has chosen to disable the default powersave in Auraxt sense, and then using SetCPU to control it, i get a day of power easily, and still goes to bed wit 50% power, that is with stock clocks on normal usage, but with minimum power (245) on screen off
Re overclocking:
To reach high clock speeds you also increase the voltage on your PC, else you can't increase the frequency that drastically.
Because you can't improve the cooling on the desire you have to keep stock voltages but also can't overclock that much.
The overclocking methods on the desire keep the voltage at stock values or even lower (defrost rom).
I don't know the voltage values for LeeDroid.
I it shouldn't get warmer. In the worst case it will crash and reboot until you reduce the clock speed.
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
I want to over clock my HTC Desire using Set CPU
What should my max over clocking be , and what temperature should my CPU run at to be safe ?
I'm currently using the RCMixHD kernel.
Depends on your kernel.
Also, li-ion batteries are designed for use around 20c-60c, but as it goes past 40c, I think it has higher discharge rate.
Depends on your phone & kernel combo - 1113 Mhz is stable for the most of the people.
I suggest playing around with and test it - 1113+ is OK for some, but if you'll get reboots and the phone gets hot, then it is not recommended.
Also if you are OCing, you'll get more power, but worse battery life.
wont it consume more battery ??
I have Coutts 2.6.38 kernel and it allows me to underclock to 128MHz and 1190MHz overclock and I use ondemand since games don't like other governers. The underclock is bloody great to have as it consumes bugger all battery life and kind of balances out the overclock. However, as nagypapi said, you might not be able to get these speeds since your phone might get hot or reboot. I think people fail to realise that not all devices are the same and what works for one person, might not work for another.
Max. clock should depend on kernel support(if the kernel supports it, then that's your maximum clock). As for temperature, I have a profile on SetCPU which down-clocks the CPU when the temperature reading goes above 36 degree celsius. All other times it works between 806MHz-245MHz OnDemand.
Walter1115 said:
I want to over clock my HTC Desire using Set CPU
What should my max over clocking be , and what temperature should my CPU run at to be safe ?
I'm currently using the RCMixHD kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sort of goes without saying that the higher the CPU cycles the more battery juice your phone will consume and the quicker your battery will drain. I use GingerVillain which supports speeds 128Mhz - 1113mhz and using Richard Trips 2.0b OC kernel (based 2.6.37.4) seems to keep battery alive for a good 24hrs. If it's any help my SetCPU profiles are as follows :
On Charge : 128-1113 performance govenor
Sleep/Standby : 128-576 conservative
Battery < 100% : 128-998 performance
Battery < 75% : 128-883 ondemand
Battery < 30% : 128-652 ondemand
Failsafe Temp > 45.1c : 128-768 conservative
Seems to give me a good balance of speed and battery life, but would be interested to hear from anyone else that thinks my settings are wrong, always looking to improve my phone!
bono2804 said:
Sort of goes without saying that the higher the CPU cycles the more battery juice your phone will consume and the quicker your battery will drain. I use GingerVillain which supports speeds 128Mhz - 1113mhz and using Richard Trips 2.0b OC kernel (based 2.6.37.4) seems to keep battery alive for a good 24hrs. If it's any help my SetCPU profiles are as follows :
On Charge : 128-1113 performance govenor
Sleep/Standby : 128-576 conservative
Battery < 100% : 128-998 performance
Battery < 75% : 128-883 ondemand
Battery < 30% : 128-652 ondemand
Failsafe Temp > 45.1c : 128-768 conservative
Seems to give me a good balance of speed and battery life, but would be interested to hear from anyone else that thinks my settings are wrong, always looking to improve my phone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would like to try this settings, but could you please also add priorities for each setting?
Also what is your main governor? (when you startup SetCPU)
Other thing i dont understand why people use such high cpu freq for battery charging (when its charging and im never using phone then, isnt it better to put some low freq. and power saving profile?)
Same about Standy/Screen off.
128 is too low, it makes my phone slow, 245 is better IMO.
Sordep said:
128 is too low, it makes my phone slow, 245 is better IMO.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
set 245 for screen off only ... Its not meant to make your phone quick its meant to conserve battery lol
BigMrB said:
set 245 for screen off only ... Its not meant to make your phone quick its meant to conserve battery lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know it, but weird, when I set the lowest value to 128, my phone's reaction become laggy, but 245 has no such problem. Maybe it's affected by kernel or rom.
sorry for my poor english
I know some roms/kernels have issues with dropping to 128 but my rom seems quite happy with it. I use higher CPU on charge and with battery above 75% to give me the performance when I have the most charge. When my phone boots it will adjust CPU according to battery life or charging profile. The settings seems to work fine for me although battery does drain quicker when I have it fully charged but that's my own fault for setting the performance govenor when I have high charge!
bono2804 said:
Sort of goes without saying that the higher the CPU cycles the more battery juice your phone will consume and the quicker your battery will drain. I use GingerVillain which supports speeds 128Mhz - 1113mhz and using Richard Trips 2.0b OC kernel (based 2.6.37.4) seems to keep battery alive for a good 24hrs. If it's any help my SetCPU profiles are as follows :
On Charge : 128-1113 performance govenor
Sleep/Standby : 128-576 conservative
Battery < 100% : 128-998 performance
Battery < 75% : 128-883 ondemand
Battery < 30% : 128-652 ondemand
Failsafe Temp > 45.1c : 128-768 conservative
Seems to give me a good balance of speed and battery life, but would be interested to hear from anyone else that thinks my settings are wrong, always looking to improve my phone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using your way! thanks!
No!
Using any CPU frequency that is not default ( underclocked or overclocked ) requires testing and manipulating the various variables. The CPU needs to be in sync with the GPU and the other parameters. Needs modifications in the kernel itself. The device is not made to run at those frequencies. You will burn your device, sooner or later.
I'm wondering if anyone's undervolted and to what values.
I'm also wondering waht the deafult values are and if they change per kernel.
Is there a way to disable SetCPUs undervolting settings?
Has anyone improved battery life with profiles? On the Eris this was the only way to get usable battery life.
Or not. I gave up undervolting after I actually compared battery life at stock values vs undervolted (on my old phone, sgs4g) and discovered it does nothing for battery life.
Edit: undervolting "might" marginally increase standby battery life, but considering how good this phone already does... it certainly won't increase actual screen on usage.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Depends how low you under volt. Got more battery life, maybe about an hour, after finding optimal battery life on my gfs Gnex.
If you don't under volt correctly, of course it won't improve battery life.
From my sexy white, Nocturnaled HTC One X
If you're not overly comfortable with undervolting, then using one of the many kernels with Smart Reflex will do a mild undervolt for you. If you are comfortable, then the only way to find numbers good for your phone is to try and test. I tweaked mine down to the point that I was occasionally getting hot boots when the screen was off and media was playing. Tweaking the numbers back up added the needed stability. Even little things like kernel or ROM revisions can change what voltage is or isn't stable. Another example is that when I updated my Jellybro CM10 version the other night, along with updating leankernel from 4.1.0exp3 to 4.2.0, I had to increase a few of my voltages to avoid hot boots.
Just for example numbers, here are mine:
Code:
1350MHz -- 1200mV
1200MHz -- 1150mV
920MHz -- 1050mV
700MHz -- 950mV
350MHz -- 825mV
These numbers will vary from device to device and even between ROM/kernel combinations, so don't use them as hard fact.
Thanks. On a phone like this it might not make a huge difference but on the Eris (Where stock battery life could sometimes be 6 hours if you actually used your phone) an undervolted kernel with setcpu could turn those 6 ours into 48.
Thanks Cilraaz, I'll try those voltages out and benchmark a bit to see if they're stable for my system.
Two things I can say for sure:
1. you will have very limit battery gain by undervolting with Gnex, no matter how low you try.
2. undervolting will bring some stable issue if you get too low, like lose signal and reboot.
I am using Kernel Franco GPU 384 Stock rom on my 4.1.1 and did undervolting
Current configuration:
384Mhz
950mv
------------
729Mhz
1050mv
-----------
1036mhz
1125mv
----------
1228mhz
1275mv
-------------
I did not change the frequencies of overclocking, because I'm not using them.
I felt an improvement in battery consumption unless the unit is heating up.
Just curious - what kind of profiles are you using? I have a "Screen off" that's 350min and 700max. I figure that's fast enough f someone calls me.
I've read many times undervolting isn't worth it.
Hungry Man said:
Just curious - what kind of profiles are you using? I have a "Screen off" that's 350min and 700max. I figure that's fast enough f someone calls me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using the following with SetCPU: default (1350MHz-350MHz), charging, CPU temp > 64, and battery < 35%.
If you're using a kernel and governor that support hotplug, then you likely don't want to use a screen off profile. The combination of the two can tend to cause sleep-of-death or hot boots.
I Am Marino said:
I've read many times undervolting isn't worth it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most people don't want to spend the time to do it right.
I'm actually not used to the new kernels. I haven't messed with my eris in about a year and back them there was "smartass, on demand, performance," and some other one that clocked down instead of up
Can you explain th escreen off profile causing issues? I don't even know what hotplug is lol I've been out of Android for a long time.
Hungry Man said:
Can you explain th escreen off profile causing issues? I don't even know what hotplug is lol I've been out of Android for a long time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hotplug disables one of the CPU cores when the screen is off. Some governors, like hotplugx, will also attempt to disable a CPU core during periods of low CPU usage. For some reason, this combined with a screen off profile can cause some problems. I assume it's because of the "screen-off-max-freq" that Imoseyon mentions in the quote below.
Personally, I prefer the interactivex governor with leankernel by Imoseyon. From his kernel thread:
With interactiveX V2 (for gnexus), things are a bit different, since gnexus has built-in support for screen-off-max-freq for all its governors. I took the new interactive code in gnexus, added early_suspend support (screen off/on trigger), and then added logic to the code so the governor uses the phone's built-in hotplugging capability to turn off cpu1 when screen is off (and then turn it back on when screen comes back on). Cpu1 goes offline entirely - no idle, no sleep.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think undervolting helps - my phone is running 728 - 1228 using the interactive governor, with voltages of 600 mV, 700 mV, and 800 mV (728 MHz, 1036 MHz, 1228 MHz respectively) and I haven't had any issues so far. I know there are some reports that say undervolting doesn't help much, but those are when people undervolt by like 50 mV, whereas here I'm going like 400 mV under lol. (Yes, smart reflex is off).
Thanks Cilraaz. Good to know.
So turning the screen-off profile could improve things? Honestly, my system does fine at 350mhz with screen off. Turning a core entirely off would probably help though.
If I use hotplugx governor that would disable one core when the screens off, right?
Hungry Man said:
If I use hotplugx governor that would disable one core when the screens off, right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hotplugx will disable a core when the screen is off or when there is low system load. Depending on your kernel/governor choice, other governors may do it also. On leankernel, for instance, interactivex will disable a core when the screen is off, but not on low system load.
Ok, thank you.
I haven't done any comparisons of before/ after since I undervolted/ underclocked first thing. But I was browsing for hours while listening to music while talking to a friend with GTalk. talked for about 1.5 hours with someone, Left it on overnight (10 hours), woke up, used it to talk (voice to text) to someone via GTalk, and it's 3:25PM right now and I still have a fair amount of battery life left.
I'd heard mixed things about the battery on this so I'm happy.
My voltages:
1650: 1300
1520: 1250
1350: 1175:
1200: 1125
920: 1000
700: 925
350: 900
I stress tested each one without a crash.
A couple weeks ago, I installed SetCPU to help with battery life. It did great! But, I didn't see the amazing improvement that I thought I would.
So, I did some research and found out about Profiles. Profiles are settings that you can make that will be applied when certain conditions are met.
Below are the profiles that I have created on my Nitro. I have seen 11 to 12 hours of medium use from my phone with these settings. If you have any suggestions on changes, please let me know. I'd like to find the absolute best settings and share them for everybody.
Profile Name: Screen Off
Conditions: Screen Off
CPU Max: 384Mhz
CPU Min: 192Mhz
Governor: powersave
Priority: 90, Exclusive
Profile Name: Charging Any
Conditions: Charging Any
CPU Max: 1512Mhz
CPU Min: 192Mhz
Governor: ondemand
Priority: 85, Exclusive
Profile Name: In Call
Conditions: In Call
CPU Max: 810Mhz
CPU Min: 192Mhz
Governor: ondemand
Priority: 80, Exclusive
Profile Name: Battery <= 10%
Conditions: Battery <= 10%
CPU Max: 594Mhz
CPU Min: 192Mhz
Governor: conservative
Priority: 75, Exclusive
Profile Name: Battery <= 25%
Conditions: Battery <= 25%
CPU Max: 972Mhz
CPU Min: 192Mhz
Governor: conservative
Priority: 70, Exclusive
Profile Name: Battery <= 50%
Conditions: Battery <= 50%
CPU Max: 1242Mhz
CPU Min: 192Mhz
Governor: ondemand
Priority: 65, Exclusive
Profile Name: Battery <= 75%
Conditions: Battery <= 75%
CPU Max: 1350Mhz
CPU Min: 192Mhz
Governor: ondemand
Priority: 60, Exclusive
By setting the profiles base on battery percentage like that, you are sacrificing the speed to improve battery life. It works in some cases but has side-effect in many other cases:
- Firstly, for some tasks that requires high CPU, apparently you need more time at lower speed, so power consumption for CPU is the same but more power needed for longer screen on -> worse battery life
- Secondly, the more profiles you use, the longer it takes for SetCPU to decide and change CPU speed, so the responsiveness is lower
For you screen off profile, if you use powersave governor, your CPU always runs at min speed, so setting the max speed at 384 MHz is meaningless.
For me, the only profile I use is the screen off profile with min = 192MHz, max = 432MHz, governor = ondemand, so that my phone will wake up faster when there's a call (otherwise you will have to wait a little bit before you can sliding Answer/Reject)
noemtfj said:
By setting the profiles base on battery percentage like that, you are sacrificing the speed to improve battery life. It works in some cases but has side-effect in many other cases:
- Firstly, for some tasks that requires high CPU, apparently you need more time at lower speed, so power consumption for CPU is the same but more power needed for longer screen on -> worse battery life
- Secondly, the more profiles you use, the longer it takes for SetCPU to decide and change CPU speed, so the responsiveness is lower
For you screen off profile, if you use powersave governor, your CPU always runs at min speed, so setting the max speed at 384 MHz is meaningless.
For me, the only profile I use is the screen off profile with min = 192MHz, max = 432MHz, governor = ondemand, so that my phone will wake up faster when there's a call (otherwise you will have to wait a little bit before you can sliding Answer/Reject)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't seen any responsiveness problems... And I'd actually like having a phone that I don't have to charge ever 3 hours over one that is unnecessarily fast.
mattman86 said:
I haven't seen any responsiveness problems... And I'd actually like having a phone that I don't have to charge ever 3 hours over one that is unnecessarily fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
His point was that scaling your CPU back so significantly isn't necessarily going to give you better battery life, and may even make it worse. When the phone is running at a slower speed, it takes longer to do certain things, which means your CPU/screen will be turned on for longer. Of course it entirely depends on what you're doing on the phone.
I think you might get just as good battery life by using interactive 1.2GHz all the time. People assume governors like interactive will destroy their battery but you'd be surprised.
mattman86 said:
I haven't seen any responsiveness problems... And I'd actually like having a phone that I don't have to charge ever 3 hours over one that is unnecessarily fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you have to charge your phone every 3 hours without SetCPU then I suggest you buy a new phone or new battery rather than playing with SetCPU
drumist said:
His point was that scaling your CPU back so significantly isn't necessarily going to give you better battery life, and may even make it worse. When the phone is running at a slower speed, it takes longer to do certain things, which means your CPU/screen will be turned on for longer. Of course it entirely depends on what you're doing on the phone.
I think you might get just as good battery life by using interactive 1.2GHz all the time. People assume governors like interactive will destroy their battery but you'd be surprised.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't do much with my phone in the way of heavy gaming or video watching. I am going off of the last couple days of having SetCPU enabled and getting almost 15 hours of medium use out of my phone.
noemtfj said:
If you have to charge your phone every 3 hours without SetCPU then I suggest you buy a new phone or new battery rather than playing with SetCPU
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was an arbitrary number.
Does anybody find this kind of post meant to make peoples phones better helpful? It seems like every time I post something that I personally have found to make the Nitro even more awesome gets a tone of comments basically telling me that none of it will ever work. I'm sure that if people would just try the things I post, they would be happy.
my setcpu setting-> uninstall
i found it did more harm than good. jd ultimate handling screen dimming&wifi with simple ondemand gov works much better for me.
scott0 said:
my setcpu setting-> uninstall
i found it did more harm than good. jd ultimate handling screen dimming&wifi with simple ondemand gov works much better for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That what I've heard also... But I found that JD ran my battery down in about 6 hours without me even touching it one day.
If you have any suggestions on settings for it, I'd love to give them a try.
mattman86 said:
That what I've heard also... But I found that JD ran my battery down in about 6 hours without me even touching it one day.
If you have any suggestions on settings for it, I'd love to give them a try.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, i guess it's diff for everybody, just like the roms eh, some get great batt perf on 1 and sucky on another and someone has exactly opposite.
anyhoo, my jd ultimate settings are
Status
advanced profile
graphical notification->quickbox
Controls
wifi enabled->wifi preferred
brightness min 20% mid 45% max 150% (gotta get the most of this screen in the sunlight!)
light sensor fast
cpu min 192 mid 918 max 1512
governor ondemand
schedules
none, i also turned off night schedule as i have the phone plugged in during those hours.
triggers
Apps enabled
Configure->configure apps allow on during screen off->pandora
Location enabled
****************i find it makes a world of difference to give jd =>3 days to get it all right.
make sure setcpu is out of the way as well.
hi,
I am running stock jellybean with franco kernel. just wondering what is the optimal CPU setup that doesnt sacrifice too much performance while increasing battery life. Im not too concerned about games as I rarely play them. I ussualy use the phone for music, calls, text, email, and webbrowsing.
I am using the Franco updater app. I have 1228 max, 230 min
and screen off max is 384.
I also noticed in cpu spy that my highest two frequencies 1036, 1228 are combined less than 10%.
with all that information, what do you suggest?
hshaikh said:
hi,
I am running stock jellybean with franco kernel. just wondering what is the optimal CPU setup that doesnt sacrifice too much performance while increasing battery life. Im not too concerned about games as I rarely play them. I ussualy use the phone for music, calls, text, email, and webbrowsing.
I am using the Franco updater app. I have 1228 max, 230 min
and screen off max is 384.
I also noticed in cpu spy that my highest two frequencies 1036, 1228 are combined less than 10%.
with all that information, what do you suggest?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suggest to decrease your max CPU until you feel it affects performance too much. You can also try switching to a governor less aggressive than interactive (try ondemand).
Don't expect magic though. I've played with decreasing max CPU clock, max CPU screen off, governor settings etc with three different kernels. Gathered stats for at least one week each time. Never noticed a difference large enough to actually matter to me. For maximizing battery life, you can gain more by hunting apps that cause a lot of (partial) wakelocks and alarms, and use low screen brightness.
hshaikh said:
and screen off max is 384.
with all that information, what do you suggest?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
don't limit screen off cpu speed to 384. it will take longer to perform operations under wakelock, thus killing of more battery than it actually saves.
it would be nice if listening to music, since it's not an intensive task and it requires constant cpu usage. still, you'll most likely have stuff syncing in the background so i don't think you're doing any good by limiting it to 384 on screen off.
power isnt going to be conserved with lower clock speed. lower clock speed means it takes longer to finish the task. to conserve power, your phone has to do less. for example, lower brightness, no sound, less/no syncing.
Darunion said:
power isnt going to be conserved with lower clock speed. lower clock speed means it takes longer to finish the task. to conserve power, your phone has to do less. for example, lower brightness, no sound, less/no syncing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, there is an optimum somewhere. Higher CPU speed means tasks are executed more quickly, but higher clock speeds also draw more current from the battery. I agree that tweaking this has little effect on battery life though.
Petrovski80 said:
Well, there is an optimum somewhere. Higher CPU speed means tasks are executed more quickly, but higher clock speeds also draw more current from the battery. I agree that tweaking this has little effect on battery life though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you are correct. there is a magic middle ground because power consumption doesnt scale in a linear way. but finding that spot would take massive testing and even getting to the center, would still probably only gain about 10-15mins average use on a battery charge :/
bk201doesntexist said:
don't limit screen off cpu speed to 384. it will take longer to perform operations under wakelock, thus killing of more battery than it actually saves.
it would be nice if listening to music, since it's not an intensive task and it requires constant cpu usage. still, you'll most likely have stuff syncing in the background so i don't think you're doing any good by limiting it to 384 on screen off.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what speed show i set to max when screen is off.
did you read anything that Darunion and Petrovski80 wrote? I keep mine at it's max, i don't care, i don't live in the woods with no electricity.
thanks for your inputs. i have experimented and I found out that changing the cpu speeds has minimal effect of battery life. the clock speed is not killing the battery the screen is. no matter what cpu settings i use i get 3-4 hours screen on time.
if i dont use the phone alot that day (like 1 hour screen on time) the battery will still be 40% after a day.
hshaikh said:
thanks for your inputs. i have experimented and I found out that changing the cpu speeds has minimal effect of battery life. the clock speed is not killing the battery the screen is. no matter what cpu settings i use i get 3-4 hours screen on time.
if i dont use the phone alot that day (like 1 hour screen on time) the battery will still be 40% after a day.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly. I get similar performance.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2